Pressure Guidewire Research Articles

Assessment with intracoronary pressure and flow guidewire, at baseline and after intracoronary adenosine infusion, in a patient with Takotsubo syndrome

Assessment with intracoronary pressure and flow guidewire, at baseline and after intracoronary adenosine infusion, in a patient with Takotsubo syndrome

Highlights From the Circulation Family of Journals.

Highlights From the Circulation Family of Journals.

Evaluate the Performance and Safety of Comet Pressure Guidewire in the Measurement of FFR

Evaluate the Performance and Safety of Comet Pressure Guidewire in the Measurement of FFR

TCT-589 Role of the Position of the Pressure Guidewire Sensor Distal to the Coronary Artery Stenosis on Fractional Flow Reserve Measurements

TCT-589 Role of the Position of the Pressure Guidewire Sensor Distal to the Coronary Artery Stenosis on Fractional Flow Reserve Measurements

Intracoronary pressure increase due to contrast injection for optical coherence tomography imaging

BackgroundOptical coherence tomography (OCT) requires intracoronary injection of contrast media to remove blood from the field of view during image acquisition. Contrast injection may cause a temporal increase in intracoronary pressure. The aim of this study was to compare the intracoronary pressure during contrast injection between OCT and coronary angiography. MethodsWe measured intracoronary pressure by using a pressure guidewire during contrast injection for OCT and angiography in 30 coronary arteries (mean fractional flow reserve = 0.90 ± 0.03). Contrast media was injected into coronary artery through the guiding catheter by using a mechanical injector pump. ResultsIntracoronary pressure before contrast injection was similar between OCT and angiography (systolic pressure: 123 ± 18 mmHg vs. 122 ± 19 mmHg, p = 0.863). Intracoronary pressure was increased due to contrast injection in both OCT (systolic pressure: 123 ± 18 mmHg to 132 ± 18 mmHg, p < 0.001) and angiography (systolic pressure: 122 ± 19 mmHg to 128 ± 19 mmHg, p < 0.001). The increase in intracoronary pressure was slightly greater in OCT compared with angiography (absolute increase of systolic pressure: 9 ± 2 mmHg vs. 6 ± 1 mmHg, p < 0.001; and relative increase of systolic pressure: 8 ± 2% vs. 5 ± 1%, p < 0.001). Intracoronary pressure during contrast injection was not significantly different between OCT and angiography (systolic pressure: 132 ± 18 mmHg vs. 128 ± 19 mmHg, p = 0.831). ConclusionsContrast injection for OCT induced significant but small increase in intracoronary pressure compared with that for angiography.

Quantification of Myocardial Mass Subtended by a Coronary Stenosis Using Intracoronary Physiology.

In patients with stable coronary artery disease, the amount of myocardium subtended by coronary stenoses constitutes a major determinant of prognosis, as well as of the benefit of coronary revascularization. We devised a novel method to estimate partial myocardial mass (PMM; ie, the amount of myocardium subtended by a stenosis) during physiological stenosis interrogation. Subsequently, we validated the index against equivalent PMM values derived from applying the Voronoi algorithm on coronary computed tomography angiography. Based on the myocardial metabolic demand and blood supply, PMM was calculated as follows: PMM (g)=APV×D2×π/(1.24×10-3×HR×sBP+1.6), where APV indicates average peak blood flow velocity; D, vessel diameter; HR, heart rate; and sBP, systolic blood pressure. We calculated PMM to 43 coronary vessels (32 patients) interrogated with pressure and Doppler guidewires, and compared it with computed tomography-based PMM. Median PMM was 15.8 g (Q1, Q3: 11.7, 28.4 g) for physiology-based PMM, and 17.0 g (Q1, Q3: 12.5, 25.9 g) for computed tomography-based PMM (P=0.84). Spearman rank correlation coefficient was 0.916 (P<0.001), and Passing-Bablok analysis revealed absence of both constant and proportional differences (coefficient A: -0.9; 95% CI, -4.5 to 0.9; and coefficient B, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.91 to 1.25]. Bland-Altman analysis documented a mean bias of 0.5 g (limit of agreement: -9.1 to 10.2 g). Physiology-based calculation of PMM in the catheterization laboratory is feasible and can be accurately performed as part of functional stenosis assessment.

Impact of pulmonary endarterectomy on pulmonary arterial wave propagation and reservoir function.

High wave speed and large wave reflection in the pulmonary artery have previously been reported in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). We assessed the impact of pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) on pulmonary arterial wave propagation and reservoir function in patients with CTEPH. Right heart catheterization was performed using a combined pressure and Doppler flow sensor-tipped guidewire to obtain simultaneous pressure and flow velocity measurements in the pulmonary artery in eight patients with CTEPH before and 3 mo after PEA. Wave intensity and reservoir-excess pressure analyses were then performed. Following PEA, mean pulmonary arterial pressure (PAPm; ∼49 vs. ∼32 mmHg), pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR; ∼11.1 vs. ∼5.1 Wood units), and wave speed (∼16.5 vs. ∼8.1 m/s), i.e., local arterial stiffness, markedly decreased. The changes in the intensity of the reflected arterial wave and wave reflection index (pre: ∼28%; post: ∼22%) were small, and patients post-PEA with and without residual pulmonary hypertension (i.e., PAPm ≥ 25 mmHg) had similar wave reflection index (∼20 vs. ∼23%). The reservoir and excess pressure decreased post-PEA, and the changes were associated with improved right ventricular afterload, function, and size. In conclusion, although PVR and arterial stiffness decreased substantially following PEA, large wave reflection persisted, even in patients without residual pulmonary hypertension, indicating lack of improvement in vascular impedance mismatch. This may continue to affect the optimal ventriculoarterial interaction, and further studies are warranted to determine whether this contributes to persistent symptoms in some patients.NEW & NOTEWORTHY We performed wave intensity analysis in the pulmonary artery in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension before and 3 mo after pulmonary endarterectomy. Despite substantial reduction in pulmonary arterial pressures, vascular resistance, and arterial stiffness, large pulmonary arterial wave reflection persisted 3 mo postsurgery, even in patients without residual pulmonary hypertension, suggestive of lack of improvement in vascular impedance mismatch.

Clinical use of physiological lesion assessment using pressure guidewires: an expert consensus document of the Japanese Association of Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics.

In this document, the background, concept, and current evidence are briefly summarized. The focus is on the clinical application of physiological lesion assessment from a practical standpoint for facilities that do not have ample experience. Finally, the characteristics of new resting indexes are summarized.

Safety of the Deferral of Coronary Revascularization on the Basis of Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio and Fractional Flow Reserve Measurements in Stable Coronary Artery Disease and Acute Coronary Syndromes

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to investigate the clinical outcomes of patients deferred from coronary revascularization on the basis of instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) or fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurements in stable angina pectoris (SAP) and acute coronary syndromes (ACS). BackgroundAssessment of coronary stenosis severity with pressure guidewires is recommended to determine the need for myocardial revascularization. MethodsThe safety of deferral of coronary revascularization in the pooled per-protocol population (n = 4,486) of the DEFINE-FLAIR (Functional Lesion Assessment of Intermediate Stenosis to Guide Revascularisation) and iFR-SWEDEHEART (Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio Versus Fractional Flow Reserve in Patients With Stable Angina Pectoris or Acute Coronary Syndrome) randomized clinical trials was investigated. Patients were stratified according to revascularization decision making on the basis of iFR or FFR and to clinical presentation (SAP or ACS). The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as the composite of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or unplanned revascularization at 1 year. ResultsCoronary revascularization was deferred in 2,130 patients. Deferral was performed in 1,117 patients (50%) in the iFR group and 1,013 patients (45%) in the FFR group (p < 0.01). At 1 year, the MACE rate in the deferred population was similar between the iFR and FFR groups (4.12% vs. 4.05%; fully adjusted hazard ratio: 1.13; 95% confidence interval: 0.72 to 1.79; p = 0.60). A clinical presentation with ACS was associated with a higher MACE rate compared with SAP in deferred patients (5.91% vs. 3.64% in ACS and SAP, respectively; fully adjusted hazard ratio: 0.61 in favor of SAP; 95% confidence interval: 0.38 to 0.99; p = 0.04). ConclusionsOverall, deferral of revascularization is equally safe with both iFR and FFR, with a low MACE rate of about 4%. Lesions were more frequently deferred when iFR was used to assess physiological significance. In deferred patients presenting with ACS, the event rate was significantly increased compared with SAP at 1 year.

Intracranial atherosclerosis: From anatomy to pathophysiology.

Background Intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis is an important etiology subtype of ischemic stroke. Stenosis severity was thought to be the main reference index for clinical treatment and research. However, stenosis could not reflect the ischemia risk completely, instead the hemodynamic state across the lesion, the extent of collateral circulation, and perfusion impairment downstream the stenosis are more important. Aims We write this review aimed to summarize novel angiographic methods applied in the evaluation of functional severity of ICAS, and commented on their limitations and prospects in future research. Summary of review The main methods to estimate cerebral blood flow including fractional flow assessed by signal intensity ratio, computational fluid dynamics analysis or pressure wire, quantitative magnetic resonance angiography. Fractional flow as a series cerebral hemodynamic parameters may reflect the status of collateral circulation and cerebral blood flow. But the accuracy of the methods was not validated. The method to calculate fractional flow reserve in cardiovascular disease cannot duplicate in cerebrovascular disease. Fractional flow measurement by floating a pressure guidewire across the intracranial stenosis was technically feasible and safe. In the future researches, a non-invasive method should be established to identify high-risk intracranial lesions and may help in decision-making. Conclusions The relationship between stenosis and cerebral blood flow was individualized. Cerebral hemodynamic criteria should be used to screen patients to endovascular treatment, which will optimize the diagnosis and treatment strategies for patients with symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis.

Visualization of the improvement of myocardial perfusion after coronary intervention using motorized fractional flow reserve pullback curve

This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and utility of using motorized pullback of the pressure guidewire to provide a graphic assessment and prediction of the benefits of coronary intervention. Fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurements were performed with motorized pullback imaging in 20 patients who underwent successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the left anterior descending artery. Physiological lesion length (PLL) was calculated using frame counts to determine stent length. FFR area was calculated by integrating the FFR values recorded during pullback tracing (FFRarea). The percentage increase in FFR area (%FFRarea) was defined as the ratio of the difference between the pre- and post-intervention FFRarea to the total frame count. The average FFR values were enhanced following PCI, from 0.64 to 0.82, and the median value of the difference between pre- and post-interventional FFR values (D-FFR) and %FFRarea were 0.13 and 10.6%, respectively. The %FFRarea demonstrated a significant positive correlation with D-FFR (R2, 0.61; p < 0.01). PLL tended to be longer and the %FFRarea was smaller in lesions with a gradual pressure-drop pattern than those with an abrupt pressure-drop pattern (35.37 vs. 20.40 mm, p = 0.07; 5.78 vs. 16.21%, p < 0.05, respectively). Motorized pullback tracing was able to identify the extent and location of stenosis and help in appropriate stent implantation, in addition to visualizing and quantifying the improvement in FFR following PCI.

Impact of functional focal versus diffuse coronary artery disease on bypass graft patency

BackgroundPressure guidewire pullback recording can differentiate between functional focal and diffuse disease types in coronary artery disease. The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) patency between patients with functional focal versus diffuse disease types in recipient coronary arteries. Methods and resultsWe investigated 89 patients who underwent pressure guidewire pullback in the left anterior descending (LAD) artery before CABG using internal mammary artery (IMA). Based on the pressure guidewire pullback data, the LAD lesions were classified into functional focal disease (abrupt pressure step-up; n=58) or functional diffuse disease (gradual pressure increase; n=31). Follow-up computed tomography (CT) angiography was conducted within 1year after CABG to assess the bypass graft patency. Pre CABG, LAD angiographic percent diameter stenosis (57±10% vs. 54±12%, p=0.228) and fractional flow reserve (FFR) (0.68±0.07 vs. 0.69±0.07, p=0.244) were not different between the functional focal and diffuse disease groups. The CABG procedure characteristics were similarly comparable between the two groups. In the follow-up CT angiography after CABG, occlusion or string sign of the IMA graft to LAD was more frequently observed in the functional diffuse disease group than in the functional focal disease group (26% vs. 7%, p=0.021). ConclusionIn CABG, functional diffuse disease in the recipient coronary artery was associated with an increased risk of the graft failure in comparison with functional focal disease.

Fractional Flow Assessment for the Evaluation of Intracranial Atherosclerosis: A Feasibility Study

Purpose: Current studies on endovascular intervention for intracranial atherosclerosis select patients based on luminal stenosis. Coronary studies demonstrated that fractional flow measurements assess ischemia better than anatomical stenosis and can guide patient selection for intervention. We similarly postulated that fractional flow can be used to assess ischemic stroke risk. Methods: This was a feasibility study to assess the technical use and safety of applying a pressure guidewire to measure fractional flow across intracranial stenoses. Twenty patients with severe intracranial stenosis were recruited. The percentage of luminal stenosis, distal to proximal pressure ratios (fractional flow) and the fractional flow gradients across the stenosis were measured. Procedural success rate and safety outcomes were documented. Results: All 20 patients had successful crossing of stenosis by the pressure guidewire. Ten patients underwent angioplasty, and 5 had stenting performed. There was one perforator stroke, but not related to the use of the pressure wire. For the 13 patients with complete pre- and postintervention data, the mean preintervention stenosis, fractional flow and translesional pressure gradient were 76.2%, 0.66 and 29.9 mm Hg, whilst the corresponding postintervention measurements were 24.7%, 0.88 and 10.9 mm Hg, respectively. Fractional flow (r = -0.530, p = 0.001) and the translesional pressure gradient (r = 0.501, p = 0.002) only had a modest correlation with the luminal stenosis. Conclusion: Fractional flow measurement by floating a pressure guidewire across the intracranial stenosis was technically feasible and safe in this study. Further studies are needed to validate its use for ischemic stroke risk assessment.

Kidney microcirculation response to adenosine stimulation in renal artery stenosis

The purpose of this study was to assess the vasoconstrictive effects of adenosine in the kidney microcirculation in hypertensive patients with renal artery stenosis (RAS). Twelve patients with resistant hypertension and moderate RAS were selected for the study. In all patients, systolic, diastolic and mean translesional pressure gradients, distal pressure (Pd), aortic pressure (Pa) and Pd/Pa ratio were measured using a pressure guidewire at baseline and after intrarenal bolus administration of 400 μg adenosine. We observed significant changes in mean translesional pressure gradient and systolic Pd after pharmacological stimulation. The results suggest that in hypertensive patients with RAS, vasomotor activity of the kidney microcirculation may be preserved.

Safety and efficacy of a novel technique in the use of fractional flow reserve in complex coronary artery lesions.

Background:Fractional flow reserve (FFR) has become an increasingly important index when making decisions with respect to revascularization of coronary artery stenosis. However, the pressure guidewire used in obtaining FFR measurements is difficult to control and manipulate in certain complex coronary artery lesions, resulting in increased fluoroscopy time and contrast dye usage. This study examined a novel (NOV) technique for obtaining FFR measurements in hope of easing the difficulties associated with evaluating and treating complex coronary artery lesions.Methods:Fifty-six patients with complex coronary artery lesions were assigned to a conventional (CON) FFR technique group or a NOV FFR technique group. The NOV technique involved the use of a balloon and wire exchange within the coronary artery. The fluoroscopy time, contrast dye usage, and FFR-related complications were assessed after completing the FFR measurement procedure for each patient.Results:The median time required for fluoroscopy in the NOV technique group was significantly less than that in the CON technique group; additionally, lesser amounts of contrast dye were used in the NOV technique group (both P < 0.05). The NOV technique was successfully performed in thirty patients, without any FFR-related complications. However, the CON technique failed in three patients, including two who experienced coronary artery spasms (P > 0.05).Conclusions:Compared to the CON technique used for measuring FFR, the new technique reduced the fluoroscopy time and amount of contrast dye used when evaluating complex coronary artery lesions. The new technique did not increase the risk of operation or decrease the success rate.

Abstract 16054: Ventricular-Arterial Coupling Biphasically Correlates to Ventricular Diastolic Chamber Stiffness in Children–Association With Aldosterone Activation

Introduction: Left ventricular–arterial coupling (LVAC), the ratio of end–systolic to effective arterial elastance (Ees/Ea), determines end–systolic pressure and stroke volume in a given preload. LV diastolic chamber stiffness (LV–K) is an important diastolic property to affect LV filling. However, the relationship between Ees/Ea and LV–K in children remains unestablished. Aldosterone (ALD) accelerates LV and arterial stiffening. Hypothesis: This study was undertaken to test the hypothesis that Ees/Ea may affect LV–K through ALD regulation in children. Methods: During catheterizations for children with biventricular circulation (N=75, median 2.5 years), blood samples for ALD were collected, and LV pressure and area relationships (PAR) were recorded using high-fidelity pressure–guidewire and echocardiographic AQ method during steady state and transient IVC occlusion. LV–K was obtained by dividing the pressure difference between LV minimal and end-diastolic pressure (EDP) by stroke volume. ALD levels were transformed into common logarithm. Results: Ees/Ea biphasically correlated to LV–K, which was approximated by downward convex parabola with a minimum at 0.9 of Ees/Ea (R=0.61, P&lt;0.0001). Ees/Ea also bipahsically correlated to log ALD, which was approximated by downward convex parabola with a minimum at 0.8 of Ees/Ea (R=0.45, P&lt;0.005). Moreover, LV–K linearly correlated to log ALD (R=0.38, P&lt;0.005). There was no significant relationship between LV–K and relative wall thickness. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate that Ees/Ea bipahsically correlated to LV–K and ALD. Dilated LV with low Ees/Ea accompanies elevated filling pressure and shows restrictive physiology with higher LV–K. On the other hand, when Ees/Ea is higher than normal range, this study indicates that there should be an increased LV diastolic stiffness which is not always associated with wall hypertrophy. Because LVAC abnormality may induce LV stiffening associated with ALD activation, chronic inhibition therapy of renin–angiotensin system to keep Ees/Ea within appropriate range may inhibit LV stiffening directly and through LVAC &amp; LV–K interaction.

Acceleration Time of Systolic Coronary Flow Velocity to Diagnose Coronary Stenosis in Patients with Microvascular Dysfunction

The aim of this study was to test whether acceleration time of systolic coronary flow velocity could contribute to the diagnosis of coronary stenosis in patients with microvascular dysfunction, on the basis of the hypothesis that systolic coronary flow is less influenced by microvascular function because of compressed myocardium. Coronary flow velocity was assessed in the left anterior descending coronary artery during hyperemia with intravenous adenosine by echocardiography in 502 patients who were scheduled for coronary angiography because of coronary artery disease and significant valvular disease. Coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) and the percentage acceleration time (%AT), as the percentage of the time from the beginning to the peak of systolic coronary flow over systolic time during hyperemia, were calculated. The diagnostic ability of CFVR and %AT for angiographic coronary artery stenosis was then analyzed. As invasive substudies, fractional flow reserve and %AT by a dual-sensor (pressure and Doppler velocity) guidewire were measured simultaneously with %AT on transthoracic echocardiography (n= 14). Patients with coronary stenosis had significantly lower CFVR (1.7 ± 0.4) and greater %AT (65 ± 9%) compared with those without stenosis (2.6 ± 0.6 and 50 ± 13%, respectively). Percentage acceleration time by Doppler echocardiography was in good agreement with %AT (r= 0.98) and fractional flow reserve (r= 0.74) invasively measured by dual-sensor guidewire. Cutoff values of CFVR and %AT were determined as 2.0 and 60% in receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of CFVR to detect coronary stenosis were 71.1%, 77.3%, and 75.4%, while those of %AT were 83.4%, 71.8%, and 75.4%, respectively. In addition, %AT provided high accuracy to detect coronary stenosis, especially in patients with previous myocardial infarctions, valvular disease, and left ventricular hypertrophy (81.1%, 84.1%, and 73.4%, respectively). The %AT of systolic coronary flow velocity is a promising marker to diagnose coronary stenosis in patients with microvascular dysfunction.

Accuracy of Computational Cerebral Aneurysm Hemodynamics Using Patient-Specific Endovascular Measurements

Computational hemodynamic simulations of cerebral aneurysms have traditionally relied on stereotypical boundary conditions (such as blood flow velocity and blood pressure) derived from published values as patient-specific measurements are unavailable or difficult to collect. However, controversy persists over the necessity of incorporating such patient-specific conditions into computational analyses. We perform simulations using both endovascularly-derived patient-specific and typical literature-derived inflow and outflow boundary conditions. Detailed three-dimensional anatomical models of the cerebral vasculature are developed from rotational angiography data, and blood flow velocity and pressure are measured in situ by a dual-sensor pressure and velocity endovascular guidewire at multiple peri-aneurysmal locations in 10 unruptured cerebral aneurysms. These measurements are used to define inflow and outflow boundary conditions for computational hemodynamic models of the aneurysms. The additional in situ measurements which are not prescribed in the simulation are then used to assess the accuracy of the simulated flow velocity and pressure drop. Simulated velocities using patient-specific boundary conditions show good agreement with the guidewire measurements at measurement locations inside the domain, with no bias in the agreement and a random scatter of ≈25%. Simulated velocities using the simplified, literature-derived values show a systematic bias and over-predicted velocity by ≈30% with a random scatter of ≈40%. Computational hemodynamics using endovascularly measured patient-specific boundary conditions have the potential to improve treatment predictions as they provide more accurate and precise results of the aneurysmal hemodynamics than those based on commonly accepted reference values for boundary conditions.

Renal Artery Stenosis in Patients With Resistant Hypertension

The aim of the study was to assess the significance of renal translesional pressure gradients in predicting improvement in resistant hypertension after stenting for moderate renal artery stenosis (RAS). In 37 patients with RAS and resistant hypertension subjected to renal stenting, translesional pressure gradients both at rest and hyperemic were measured using a pressure guidewire. Twenty-four-hour ambulatory blood pressure measurements were performed in all patients on admission and 3 months after the intervention. Angioplasty was successful in all patients, with reduction of artery diameter stenosis from 60 ± 12% to 10 ± 6% (p <0.0001). At 3 months, with maintained hypotensive agents (4.0 ± 1.4 vs 4.0 ± 1.6), significant reductions in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure were noted (-5 and -2 mm Hg, respectively). In multivariate analysis, the mean baseline gradient (MBG) was the only independent predictor of improvement in SBP (regression coefficient 0.292; standard error 0.11; p value 0.014). In the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, MBG had a larger area under the curve than other parameters, and the MBG >22 mm Hg had the highest sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy (50%, 95%, and 0.74%, respectively) in predicting hypertension improvement after stenting. In patients with MBG >22 mm Hg, SBP decreased by 12 versus 3 mm Hg (p <0.01) in patients with MBG ≤22 mm Hg, whereas diastolic blood pressure in both groups decreased by 3 versus 1 mm Hg, respectively (NS). In conclusion, MBG value of >22 mm Hg provides the highest accuracy in predicting hypertension improvement after stenting for moderate RAS in patients with resistant hypertension.

Fractional Flow–Guided Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

The traditional basis for all forms of coronary artery revascularization has been the percent stenosis resulting from an atherosclerotic plaque or thrombotic occlusion based on coronary angiography. With the introduction of fractional flow reserve (FFR) technology, a new gold standard has been developed to assess the severity of a coronary artery stenosis that takes into account the physiology of that stenosis. Article see p 1405 FFR is defined as the ratio of maximal blood flow across a stenotic lesion compared with normal maximal flow. It is measured with a coronary pressure guidewire and is compared with the aortic pressure measured simultaneously with the guide catheter during maximum hyperemia. An FFR value of 90%.1 The FFR technique requires some extra manipulation during the catheterization, and a central line may be necessary if intravenous adenosine is used to elicit the maximal hyperemic response. Although there is potential for trauma to the coronary vessel, this complication is rarely reported. Initially, FFR was used to determine the applicability of stenting for patients with single-vessel disease. In a study involving 67 patients with multivessel disease, Melikian and coworkers2 showed that FFR measurements were not influenced by either the presence or absence of stenosis in other adjacent vessels and could be used to assess coronary stenosis in patients with multivessel disease. The Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography in Multivessel Evaluation (FAME) I trial used FFR to determine the need for stent deployment in 1005 patients with ≥2 diseased coronary arteries compared with decisions based on angiography alone.3 The primary end point, a combination of death, myocardial infarction, and the need for repeat revascularization, occurred in 18.3% of patients in the angiography group compared with 13.2% in the FFR group ( P …