The paper from Iacoangeli and his colleagues from Ancona and Rome in this issue of Acta Neurochirurgica is timely given the continuing controversy on best treatment options for vestibular schwannomas. Their report is on the preliminary experience with an old approach integrated with the endoscope. The case material includes ten cases of small and medium sized sporadic acoustic neuromas (five cases of 8 and 10 mm, five cases of 11–25 mm), selected on the basis of a favourable anatomy of the temporal bone. It is noteworthy, and rather exceptional in comparison to other’s experiences, that only three cases out of ten had a preoperative normal facial nerve function, while four cases of 11–25 mm had a House-Brackmann (HB) grade 3 and three cases of 10 and 20 mm had a HB grade 2, which makes 70 % of preoperative facial dysfunction in small and medium-size tumors. The surgical outcome was outstanding, with unchanged postoperative facial function (with the exception of the case with preoperative radiotherapy), only one case experiencing a hearing loss from AAORLHNS class B to C, and no instances of deafness. The removal of tumors from the internal auditory canal without a drill meatotomy in this series might have been favoured by a limited extension into the canal. The results on the hearing and facial nerve are superior to the results reported in the literature.