The Risks of Knowledge: Investigations into the Death of the Hon. Minister John Robert Ouko in Kenya, 1990. By David William Cohen and E. S. Atieno Odhiambo. Athens: Ohio University Press, 2004. Pp. vi, 344. $59.95 cloth, $26.95 paper. In 1990, Kenya's foreign minister Robert Ouko was brutally murdered. His burned body was found, with a bullet in his head, near his farm in Koru. Ouko's killing followed an unofficial trip to Washington, D.C., by Kenya's head of state, Daniel arap Moi. At taxpayers' expense, Moi traveled in a leased Concorde jet, joined by an entourage of eighty-four ministers, including Ouko. Kenya at that time was engulfed in high-level state looting and human rights' abuse. The first President Bush snubbed President Moi and refused to meet with him, when Moi had come to the U.S. uninvited after having been hammered in the press and by human rights organizations. While in the United States, Kenya's former minister of energy and consummate Moi insider Nicholas Biwott apparently accused Ouko of upstaging the president, conspiring to unseat him, and spilling the beans to outsiders about corruption in Kenya. Biwott was also working to undermine a deal Ouko was trying to put through with a Swiss company to revive the molasses plant in Kisumu. After his return to Kenya, Ouko was relieved of his passport and told by the president to go home and rest. He was killed about nine days later, some say by Moi or Biwott, after being taken away in a white car seen at a distance by Ouko's house servant, Selena Were. The study does not seek to answer such questions as how Ouko died, who killed him, or why. Using a postmodernist approach instead, David Cohen and Atieno Odhiambo look at the process involved in the production of (p. 221) about the case. Thus their book examines what is known about Ouko's death from the standpoint of many different individuals and sources: family members, friends, colleagues, government officials, house servants, hangers-on, and others, views mostly culled from official transcripts, reports, inquiries, newspaper articles, and books by some of the principals. For those not of the postmodernist bent, the rendition of similar points by different actors easily descends into tedious repetition and rabid empiricism. How many times does one need to hear about the white car that came to take Ouko away in the middle of the night, or Ouko's statement to his sister that these are the things that are killing me? Or to read such unenlightening details as the plot number of Ouko's farm, his Kisumu and Koru telephone numbers, or the license number of his Datsun pickup. The study would have been stronger if the authors had sorted facts from gossip and provided more analysis about what Ouko's murder can tell us broadly and systematically about the state and politics in Kenya at the time. The postmodernist approach taken by the authors does not seek to reveal truths or to analyze them, but rather to present a set of narratives surrounding the murder. As the authors note in an opaque and jargon-laden introduction and conclusion, they see their task as providing the social history of knowledge in formation rather than discussing objective conditions (p. 28). This perspective is cumbersome, as there is a factual answer to the question of who killed Ouko and what this tells us about the politics of the time. Consequently, the study is a bit like stepping into the unsorted files of a police inquiry midstream; it is messy and inconclusive, and needs more facts, analysis, refinement, and editing. The book could also have benefited from the application of more traditional historical methods, including going back to reconstruct the period now and interviewing individuals whose earlier official testimonies might have been distorted by a climate of suspicion and fear. Instead, without such fieldwork, the study engages in a number of contorted speculations, using postmodernist terminology (e. …