Kefford, N. P., and P. L. Goldacre. (Division of Plant Industry, C.S.I.R.O., Canberra, Australia.) The changing concept of auxin. Amer. Jour. Bot. 48(7): 643–650. Illus. 1961.—Recent findings in auxin research are interpreted as follows: The concept of auxin as only a cell‐enlargement regulator can no longer accommodate the variety of growth phenomena controlled by auxin. In isolated tissues, auxin interacts with gibberellin in the control of cell enlargement, and auxin and kinin interact in initiating cell division. Some evidence suggests a single site of auxin action for both processes. It is proposed that auxin is not a determining agent but a predisposing agent, causing the production of something in limiting amount which is required in both processes —in the presence of kinin, cell division is activated; in the presence of gibberellin, cell enlargement is activated. In the presence of limiting amounts of auxin, there could be competition between the 2 processes, the outcome depending on the balance of kinin and gibberellin. The possibility of competition in the presence of supraoptimal auxin concentrations is also suggested. Difficulties arise in the application of this concept to observations on intact plants, where cause and effect relationships are not readily established; the use of excised plant parts shows the relationships more clearly. The role of auxin in cell and organ differentiation is also discussed. The primary auxin reaction is not yet known. The biological assay for auxins is discussed with reference to this and to natural auxins. The function of auxin in the correlation of tissue and organ growth through the auxin transport system is stressed, and it is pointed out that if transport is a necessary requirement of a native auxin, indole‐3‐acetic acid is at present the only substance known to qualify.
Read full abstract