Aims: Colorectal perforation is an infrecuent complication of colonoscopy. Studies concerning possible factors which may facilitate endoscopic colon perforation are scant. The aim of this study is to review our iatrogenic perforations in order to determine risk factors, paying special attention to sedation. Material and Methods: We have analized perforations non directly caused by therapeutical manoeuvres in a series of 18781 consecutive colonoscopies, 6781 under concious sedation (Diazepam) and 12000 under deep sedation (Propofol IV). We compared colonoscopies with iatrogenic perforation with a control group, alleatorily selected, of 281 colonoscopies without complications. We considered as possible risk factors the following parameters: age and sex, inpatient/outpapient, colonoscopy indication, patient tolerance, bowel preparation, presence of diverticular disease, previous abdominal surgery, endoscopist expertise (staff or resident) and type of sedation. Univariate analysis was performed by means of Student, Fisher and Chi square tests. A logistic regression multivariate analysis was performed. We determined Odds ratio (95% C.I.) to calculate the increased perforation risk for the different variables. Results: 23 cases of perforation were registered (0.122%). Univariate analysis showed a higher perforation risk for age (perforated: 76.4 ± 8.5 years; controls: 57.4 ± 16.9, p < 0.01), inpatients: perforated 18/109; outpatients 5/191, p < 0.001, OR = 7.36 CI(2.5-20.45); diverticular disease: perforated 13/77; without diverticles: 10/224, p < 0.001, OR 0 4.35 CI(1.82-10.38); and previous abdominal surgery: perforated 15/36; without surgery: perforated 8/41, p < 0.05, OR = 2.95 CI(1.06-8.15). Multivariate analysis showed an independent prognostic value for age > 70 years (OR = 6.55, CI(1.76-24.32), p = 0.005; inpatients: OR = 4.69, CI(1.56-14.08) p = 0.006 and diverticular disease: OR = 2.64, CI(1.01-6.86), p = 0.047. Conclusions: 1. Perforation rate after colonoscopy performance was 0.122% in our series. 2. Age older than 70 years, inpatients and the presence of diverticular disease are risk factors with independent predictive value for perforation. 3. Deep sedation does not significantly increase perforation risk. Aims: Colorectal perforation is an infrecuent complication of colonoscopy. Studies concerning possible factors which may facilitate endoscopic colon perforation are scant. The aim of this study is to review our iatrogenic perforations in order to determine risk factors, paying special attention to sedation. Material and Methods: We have analized perforations non directly caused by therapeutical manoeuvres in a series of 18781 consecutive colonoscopies, 6781 under concious sedation (Diazepam) and 12000 under deep sedation (Propofol IV). We compared colonoscopies with iatrogenic perforation with a control group, alleatorily selected, of 281 colonoscopies without complications. We considered as possible risk factors the following parameters: age and sex, inpatient/outpapient, colonoscopy indication, patient tolerance, bowel preparation, presence of diverticular disease, previous abdominal surgery, endoscopist expertise (staff or resident) and type of sedation. Univariate analysis was performed by means of Student, Fisher and Chi square tests. A logistic regression multivariate analysis was performed. We determined Odds ratio (95% C.I.) to calculate the increased perforation risk for the different variables. Results: 23 cases of perforation were registered (0.122%). Univariate analysis showed a higher perforation risk for age (perforated: 76.4 ± 8.5 years; controls: 57.4 ± 16.9, p < 0.01), inpatients: perforated 18/109; outpatients 5/191, p < 0.001, OR = 7.36 CI(2.5-20.45); diverticular disease: perforated 13/77; without diverticles: 10/224, p < 0.001, OR 0 4.35 CI(1.82-10.38); and previous abdominal surgery: perforated 15/36; without surgery: perforated 8/41, p < 0.05, OR = 2.95 CI(1.06-8.15). Multivariate analysis showed an independent prognostic value for age > 70 years (OR = 6.55, CI(1.76-24.32), p = 0.005; inpatients: OR = 4.69, CI(1.56-14.08) p = 0.006 and diverticular disease: OR = 2.64, CI(1.01-6.86), p = 0.047. Conclusions: 1. Perforation rate after colonoscopy performance was 0.122% in our series. 2. Age older than 70 years, inpatients and the presence of diverticular disease are risk factors with independent predictive value for perforation. 3. Deep sedation does not significantly increase perforation risk.
Read full abstract