Prescription Of Β-blockers Research Articles

Beta-blocker could show the prognostic impact in heart failure patients even on the regular hemodialysis

Abstract Background β-blockers are recommended as standard medications for patients with heart failure (HF) and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). However, this favorable prognostic effect of β-blockers has not been fully validated in patients receiving regular hemodialysis. Indeed, prior clinical trials have generally excluded such very high-risk population for adverse cardiovascular events. Main reasons for that are the limited number of regular hemodialysis patients in the Western nations, and too high rates of clinical events. Purpose This study aimed to clarify the prognostic benefit of β-blocker in patients on regular hemodialysis who were hospitalized due to HF. Methods This observational study included 1,930 consecutive patients who were hospitalized for worsening of HF and discharged alive from 2013 to 2019. Of them, 151 patients who underwent regular hemodialysis were ultimately analyzed. They were divided into 2 groups depending on the prescription of β-blocker at the discharge; β-blocker group (n=115) and No-β-blocker group (n=36). The primary endpoint of this study was a composite of death from any cause and rehospitalization due to HF. Results During the observation period with 501 days of median follow-up (IQR: 197–954 days), the primary endpoint was occurred in 45 patients (39%) who were receiving β-blockers, while in 24 patients (67%) who were not. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a significantly lower rate of the primary endpoint in patients in the β-blocker group (Log-rank, p<0.001, Figure). After the adjustment for age, sex, LVEF, systolic blood pressure, heart rate and atrial fibrillation, the administration of β-blocker was still an independent predictor for the primary endpoint in patients who underwent regular hemodialysis (hazard ratio; 0.46, 95% confidence interval; 0.26–0.82). Further analysis each for the population with reduced LVEF (<45%) and preserved LVEF (>45%) showed that the main result of the current study was consistent with that in the reduced LVEF group (Log-rank, p=0.005), but was diminished in the preserved LVEF group (p=0.13). Conclusion The prescription of β-blocker at discharge in HF patients with regular hemodialysis was associated with lower risk of adverse cardiovascular events, mainly in the patients with reduced LVEF. From the findings of our study, we should consider the administration of β-blockers in HF patients, even they are on the regular hemodialysis. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None. Figure 1

Rationale and design of the pragmatic clinical trial tREatment with Beta-blockers after myOcardial infarction withOut reduced ejection fracTion (REBOOT).

There is a lack of evidence regarding the benefits of β-blocker treatment after invasively managed acute myocardial infarction (MI) without reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). The tREatment with Beta-blockers after myOcardial infarction withOut reduced ejection fracTion (REBOOT) trial is a pragmatic, controlled, prospective, randomized, open-label blinded endpoint (PROBE design) clinical trial testing the benefits of β-blocker maintenance therapy in patients discharged after MI with or without ST-segment elevation. Patients eligible for participation are those managed invasively during index hospitalization (coronary angiography), with LVEF >40%, and no history of heart failure (HF). At discharge, patients will be randomized 1:1 to β-blocker therapy (agent and dose according to treating physician) or no β-blocker therapy. The primary endpoint is a composite of all-cause death, non-fatal reinfarction, or HF hospitalization over a median follow-up period of 2.75 years (minimum 2 years, maximum 3 years). Key secondary endpoints include the incidence of the individual components of the primary composite endpoint, the incidence of cardiac death, and incidence of malignant ventricular arrhythmias or resuscitated cardiac arrest. The primary endpoint will be analysed according to the intention-to-treat principle. The REBOOT trial will provide robust evidence to guide the prescription of β-blockers to patients discharged after MI without reduced LVEF.

Association of Dual Eligibility for Medicare and Medicaid With Heart Failure Quality and Outcomes Among Get With The Guidelines–Heart Failure Hospitals

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services uses a new peer group-based payment system to compare hospital performance as part of its Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program, which classifies hospitals into quintiles based on their share of dual-eligible beneficiaries for Medicare and Medicaid. However, little is known about the association of a hospital's share of dual-eligible beneficiaries with the quality of care and outcomes for patients with heart failure (HF). To evaluate the association between a hospital's proportion of patients with dual eligibility for Medicare and Medicaid and HF quality of care and outcomes. This retrospective cohort study evaluated 436 196 patients hospitalized for HF using the Get With The Guidelines-Heart Failure registry from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2017. The analysis included patients 65 years or older with available data on dual-eligibility status. Hospitals were divided into quintiles based on their share of dual-eligible patients. Quality and outcomes were analyzed using unadjusted and adjusted multivariable logistic regression models. Data analysis was performed from April 1, 2020, to January 1, 2021. The primary outcome was 30-day all-cause readmission. The secondary outcomes included in-hospital mortality, 30-day HF readmissions, 30-day all-cause mortality, and HF process of care measures. A total of 436 196 hospitalized HF patients 65 years or older from 535 hospital sites were identified, with 258 995 hospitalized patients (median age, 81 years; interquartile range, 74-87 years) at 455 sites meeting the study criteria and included in the primary analysis. A total of 258 995 HF hospitalizations from 455 sites were included in the primary analysis of the study. Hospitals in the highest dual-eligibility quintile (quintile 5) tended to care for patients who were younger, were more likely to be female, belonged to racial minority groups, or were located in rural areas compared with quintile 1 sites. After multivariable adjustment, hospitals with the highest quintile of dual eligibility were associated with lower rates of key process measures, including evidence-based β-blocker prescription, measure of left ventricular function, and anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter. Differences in clinical outcomes were seen with higher 30-day all-cause (adjusted odds ratio, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.14-1.35) and HF (adjusted odds ratio, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.03-1.27) readmissions in higher dual-eligible quintile 5 sites compared with quintile 1 sites. Risk-adjusted in-hospital and 30-day mortality did not significantly differ in quintile 1 vs quintile 5 hospitals. In this cohort study, hospitals with a higher share of dual-eligible patients provided care with lower rates of some of the key HF quality of care process measures and with higher 30-day all-cause or HF readmissions compared with lower dual-eligibility quintile hospitals.

The Affordability of Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy: Cost Sharing is a Critical Barrier to Therapy Adoption.

The Affordability of Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy: Cost Sharing is a Critical Barrier to Therapy Adoption.

β-blocker prescription is associated with lower cumulative risk of knee osteoarthritis and knee pain consultations in primary care: a propensity score-matched cohort study.

ObjectivesTo examine the association between β-blocker prescription and first primary-care consultation for knee OA, hip OA, knee pain and hip pain.MethodsData source: Clinical Practice Research Datalink. Participants aged ≥40 years in receipt of new oral β-blocker prescriptions were propensity score (PS) matched to an unexposed control. Cox proportional hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs were calculated, and adjusted for non-osteoporotic fractures, number of primary-care consultations for knee or hip injury, and, the number of primary-care consultations, out-patient referrals and hospitalizations in the 12 months preceding cohort entry. Analysis was stratified according to β-blocker class and for commonly prescribed drugs. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.ResultsA total of 111 718 β-blocker–exposed participants were 1:1 PS matched to unexposed controls. β-blocker prescription was associated with reduced cumulative risk of knee OA, knee pain, and hip pain consultations [with a HR (95% CI) of 0.90 (0.83, 0.98), 0.88 (0.83, 0.92) and 0.85 (0.79, 0.90), respectively]. Propranolol and atenolol were associated with a lower incidence of knee OA and knee pain consultations with a HR of between 0.78 and 0.91. β-blockers were associated with reduced incidence of consultation for large-joint lower-limb OA/pain as a composite outcome, defined as the earliest of knee OA, knee pain, hip OA or a hip pain consultation [with a HR (95% CI) of 0.87 (0.84, 0.90)].ConclusionCommonly used β-blockers have analgesic properties for musculoskeletal pain. Atenolol might be a therapeutic option for OA and cardiovascular co-morbidities in which β-blockers are indicated, while propranolol may be suitable for people with co-morbid anxiety. A confirmatory randomized controlled trial is needed before clinical practice is changed.

Cardiovascular disease history and β-blocker prescription patterns among Japanese and American patients with CKD: a cross-sectional study of the CRIC and CKD-JAC studies.

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a major complication in individuals with chronic kidney disease (CKD). In Japan, the incidence of CVD among persons with CKD is lower than that in the United States. Although various classes of antihypertensive agents are prescribed to prevent CVD, the proportion varies between the United States and Japan. Until now, few studies have compared clinical practices and CVD prevalence among patients with CKD in the United States vs. Japan. In this study, we performed a cross-sectional comparison of the prevalence of CVD and the prescription of β-blockers at study entry to the Chronic Kidney Disease Japan Cohort (CKD-JAC) Study and the Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort (CRIC) Study. The mean patient age was 58.2 and 60.3 years, the mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was 42.8 and 28.9 (mL/min/1.73 m2), and the median urinary albumin:creatinine ratio was 51.9 and 485.9 (mg/g) among 3939 participants in the CRIC Study and 2966 participants in the CKD-JAC Study, respectively. The prevalence of any CVD according to a self-report (CRIC Study) was 33%, while that according to a medical chart review (CKD-JAC Study) was 24%. These findings were consistent across eGFR levels. Prescriptions for β-blockers differed between the CRIC and CKD-JAC Studies (49% and 20%, respectively). The odds ratios for the association of any history of CVD and β-blocker prescription were 3.0 [2.6-3.5] in the CRIC Study and 2.0 [1.6-2.5] in the CKD-JAC Study (P < 0.001 for the interaction). In conclusion, the prevalence of CVD and treatment with β-blockers were higher in the CRIC Study across eGFR levels.

Effect of Beta-Blocker Cardioselectivity on Vascular Refilling in Hemodialysis Patients

Background: β-Blockers are the most frequently prescribed cardioprotective drugs in hemodialysis (HD) patients, despite their weak evidence. We sought to evaluate the effects of β-blockers on vascular refilling during HD treatments and examine whether carvedilol, for being noncardioselective and poorly dialyzable, associates more impact than others. Methods: The study was performed in a cohort of maintenance HD patients from a tertiary center. All patients had previous β-blocker prescription. We conducted a prospective crossover study and measured vascular refilling volume (V_ref) and vascular refilling fraction (F_ref) in 2 circumstances: under β-blocker treatment (βb profile) and without β-blocker effect (non-βb profile). Results: Twenty patients were included, 10 of whom were treated with carvedilol. Predialysis values were comparable between the 2 profiles. Although the βb profile showed lower V_ref and higher ABV drop, these differences did not reach statistical significance. Data showed an increase in F_ref in the non-βb profile (70.01 ± 6.80% vs. 63.14 ± 11.65%; p = 0.015). The βb profile associated a significantly higher risk of intradialytic hypotension (IDH) (risk ratio 2.40; 95% CI: 1.04–5.55). When analyzing separately the carvedilol group, patients dialyzed under drug effect experienced a significant impairment in V_ref, F_ref, and refilling rate. Conclusions: Administering β-blockers before HD associated a higher risk of IDH and a decrease in F_ref. Patients dialyzed under carvedilol effect showed an impaired refilling, probably related to its noncardioselectivity and lower dializability.

Heart Failure Prescribing Quality at Discharge from a Critical Care Unit in Egypt: The Impact of Multidisciplinary Care.

Discharge prescriptions for heart failure (HF) patients may not adhere to the clinical practice guidelines. This study aimed to assess the impact of the clinical pharmacist as a member of a multidisciplinary team on the quality of prescribing to HF patients at discharge from a Critical Care Unit (CCU) in Egypt. This was a retrospective cohort study of HF patients discharged from the CCU between January 2013 and December 2017. Guideline Adherence Index (GAI-3) was used to assess guideline-directed prescribing at discharge. Multidisciplinary care was introduced to the CCU on 1 January 2016. The study included 284 HF patients, mean (±SD) age 66.7 ± 11.5 years, 53.2% male. Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction affected 100 patients (35.2%). At discharge, loop diuretics were prescribed to 85.2% of patients; mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists to 54.9%; angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers to 51.4%; and β-blockers to 29.9%. Population Guideline Adherence Index (GAI-3) was 45.5%. High-GAI was prescribed to 136 patients (47.9%). Patients with High-GAI were younger; less affected by chronic kidney disease and had fewer comorbidities than those without High-GAI. Prescription of β-blocker increased (24.1% vs. 38.6%, p < 0.001) and digoxin utilization decreased (34.7% vs. 23.7%, p < 0.049) after the introduction of the multidisciplinary care. The inclusion of a clinical pharmacist in the multidisciplinary care team may have a role in optimizing the prescribing of HF guideline-directed therapies at discharge from this setting.

Optimal Medical Therapy Prescription in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome in the Netherlands: A Multicenter Pilot Registry.

BackgroundUnlike neighboring countries, the Netherlands does not have a national acute coronary syndrome (ACS) registry to evaluate quality of care.ObjectiveWe conducted a pilot registry in two hospitals to assess the prescription of guideline-recommended therapies in Dutch patients with ACS.MethodsWe included all consecutive patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-STEMI (NSTEMI) (n = 1309) admitted to two Dutch percutaneous coronary intervention centers between March 2015 and February 2016. We collected follow-up medication use and reasons for discontinuation at discharge and 1, 6, and 12 months post-discharge. We assessed the use of optimal medical therapy (OMT), defined as the combined prescription of aspirin, P2Y12 inhibitors, statins, β-blockers, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin-receptor blockers.ResultsOMT prescription was 43.2% at discharge, 60.1% at 1 month, and 28.7% at 12 months. At 1 month, OMT prescription was significantly lower in patients with NSTEMI (51.8 vs. 65.7% for STEMI; p < 0.001). OMT prescription was lower in women (6 months: 55.4 vs. 62.0%, p = 0.036) and in elderly patients.ConclusionIn this pilot study that aimed to extend a national Dutch ACS registry to patients with STEMI and NSTEMI, OMT prescription was comparable to that in other local registries, was lower in women and patients with NSTEMI, and decreased with increasing age.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1007/s40256-020-00427-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Comparative overview of ST-elevation myocardial infarction epidemiology, demographics, management, and outcomes in five Asia-Pacific countries: a meta-analysis.

The aim of this study is to gain insight into the differences in demographics of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients in Asia-Pacific, as well as inter-country variation in treatment and mortality outcomes. Systematic review of published studies and reports from known registries in Australia, Japan, Korea, Singapore, and Malaysia that began data collection after the year 2000. Supplementary self-report survey questionnaire on public health data answered by representative cardiologists working in these countries. Twenty studies comprising of 158 420 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The mean age was 61.6 years. Chronic kidney disease prevalence was higher in Japan, while dyslipidaemia was low in Korea. Use of aspirin, P2Y12 inhibitors, and statins were high throughout, but ACEi/ARB and β-blocker prescriptions were lower in Japan and Malaysia. Reperfusion strategies varied greatly, with high rates of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) in Korea (91.6%), whilst Malaysia relies far more on fibrinolysis (72.6%) than pPCI (9.6%). Similarly, mortality differed, with 1-year mortality from STEMI was considerably greater in Malaysia (17.9%) and Singapore (11.2%) than in Korea (8.1%), Australia (7.8%), and Japan (6.2%). The countries were broadly similar in development and public health indices. Singapore has the highest gross national income and total healthcare expenditure per capita, whilst Malaysia has the lowest. Primary PCI is available in all countries 24/7/365. Despite broadly comparable public health systems, differences exist in patient profile, in-hospital treatment, and mortality outcomes in these five countries. Our study reveals areas for improvements. The authors advocate further registry-based multi-country comparative studies focused on the Asia-Pacific region.

Long-term β-blocker therapy and clinical outcomes after acute myocardial infarction in patients without heart failure: nationwide cohort study.

To investigate the association between long-term β-blocker therapy and clinical outcomes in patients without heart failure (HF) after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Between 2010 and 2015, a total of 28970 patients who underwent coronary revascularization for AMI with β-blocker prescription at hospital discharge and were event-free from death, recurrent myocardial infarction (MI), or HF for 1 year were enrolled from Korean nationwide medical insurance data. The primary outcome was all-cause death. The secondary outcomes were recurrent MI, hospitalization for new HF, and a composite of all-cause death, recurrent MI, or hospitalization for new HF. Outcomes were compared between β-blocker therapy for ≥1 year (N = 22707) and β-blocker therapy for <1 year (N = 6263) using landmark analysis at 1 year after index MI. Compared with patients receiving β-blocker therapy for <1 year, those receiving β-blocker therapy for ≥1 year had significantly lower risks of all-cause death [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.81; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.72-0.91] and composite of all-cause death, recurrent MI, or hospitalization for new HF (adjusted HR 0.82; 95% CI 0.75-0.89), but not the risks of recurrent MI or hospitalization for new HF. The lower risk of all-cause death associated with persistent β-blocker therapy was observed beyond 2 years (adjusted HR 0.86; 95% CI 0.75-0.99) but not beyond 3 years (adjusted HR 0.87; 95% CI 0.73-1.03) after MI. In this nationwide cohort, β-blocker therapy for ≥1 year after MI was associated with reduced all-cause death among patients with AMI without HF.

Investigating the impact of medical comorbidities in patients taking beta blockers and treated with immunotherapy for metastatic melanoma.

e15162 Background: Combined administration of β-adrenergic antagonist with IL-2, anti-PD-1, and/or anti-CTLA-4 immunotherapy was associated with a better overall survival in metastatic melanoma patients. This result was also reinforced by the significant reduction in tumor growth in a murine melanoma model when a β2-selective antagonist was combined with anti-PD1/IL-2 immunotherapy. Here we sought to elucidate the impact of the various comorbidities behind the indications of β-blockers, and how they might have influenced the patients’ immunotherapy treatment response. Methods: A single-institution retrospective chart review was performed to examine the medical comorbidities with indications for β-blockers in the melanoma patients who received IL-2, αPD-1 and/or αCTLA-4 immunotherapy between January 2000 and March 2015. Two groups were identified: one that took a selective β-1 blocker (N = 41), and another that took a nonselective pan β-blocker (N = 17). The primary analysis compared the distribution of different comorbidity types between two groups, using the Fisher’s exact test. A secondary analysis examined the association of overall survival and the β-blocker groups by further controlling for comorbid conditions, using the multivariate Cox Proportional-Hazard regression model. Results: Seven different comorbidities with indications for β-blocker usage were identified. Of those comorbidities, only the presence of ischemic heart disease was marginally different between the two groups (β-1 group 19.5% vs. pan-β group 47.1%, p-value = 0.0697). There was no difference for overall survival between each of the comorbidity conditions. When performing the multivariate Cox Proportional-Hazard regression model, β-blocker usage still remained statistically significant for the overall survival (HR 0.27, CI 0.0966-0.768, p = 0.0139), even after controlling for the comorbid conditions. Conclusions: Immunotherapy with pan β-adrenergic blockade was associated with a significantly improved overall survival rate for metastatic melanoma. Furthermore, having a comorbid condition that indicated for the prescription of β-blockers was not a factor in establishing this survival rate.

Association of β-Blocker Therapy at Discharge with Clinical Outcomes after Acute Coronary Syndrome in Patients without Heart Failure.

Aim To evaluate the clinical impact of β-blocker in patients with adequate left ventricular ejection function (LVEF) who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Methods A total of 10,724 consecutive patients who underwent PCI throughout 2013 were prospectively enrolled in the study. Among these, we analyzed 5,631 ACS patients who were discharged with LVEF ≥ 40%. Patients were then compared according to the β-blocker prescription at discharge. Results During a 2-year follow-up, no significant association was observed of β-blocker use with all-cause mortality (with β-blockers 47/5,043 (0.9%) vs. without β-blocker use 8/588 (1.4%); hazard ratio (HR) 0.762, 95% confidence interval 0.36 to 1.64; P = 0.485), cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), or major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that the β-blocker use at discharge reduced the 2-year mortality in patients with unstable angina (UA) (HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.94, P = 0.034). Landmark analysis at 1 year showed that patients with UA who were discharged with β-blockers had lower mortality (HR 0.17, 95% CI 0.04-0.65, P = 0.010) and cardiac death (HR 0.12, 95% CI 0.01-0.99, P = 0.049) than those discharged without β-blockers. However, the benefit was lost beyond 1 year. No differences in outcomes were recorded in the AMI or overall population. Conclusions We present that β-blocker significantly lowers the rate of all-cause death up to 1 year, in UA patients who have undergone PCI and have adequate LVEF. Its role in patients with AMI also deserves further exploration.

Metoprolol Versus Carvedilol in Patients With Heart Failure, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Diabetes Mellitus, and Renal Failure

This study compared the survival and the risk of heart failure (HF), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), diabetes mellitus (DM), hypoglycemia, and renal failure (RF) hospitalizations in geriatric patients exposed to carvedilol or metoprolol. Data sources were Danish administrative registers. Patients aged ≥65 and having HF, COPD, and DM were followed for 1 year from the first β-blocker prescription redemption. Patients' characteristics were used to 1:1 propensity score match carvedilol and metoprolol users. A Cox regression model was used to compute the hazard ratio (HR) of study outcomes. For statistically significant associations, a conditional inference tree was used to assess predictors most associated with the outcome. In total, 1,424 patients were included. No statistically significant differences were observed for survival (HR 0.86; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67 to 1.11, p = 0.240) between carvedilol/metoprolol users. The same applied to COPD (HR 0.88; 95% CI 0.75 to 1.05, p = 0.177), DM (HR 0.95; 95% CI 0.82 to 1.10, p = 0.485), hypoglycemia (HR 0.88; 95% CI 0.47 to 1.67, p = 0.707), and RF (HR 1.25; 95% CI 0.93 to 1.69, p = 0.142) hospitalizations. Carvedilol users had a 38% higher hazard then metoprolol users of HF hospitalization during the follow-up period (HR 1.38; 95% CI 1.19 to 1.60, p <0.001). Artificial intelligence identified carvedilol exposure as the most important predictor for HF hospitalization. In conclusion, we found an increased risk of HF hospitalization for carvedilol users with this triad of diseases but no statistically significant differences in survival or risk of COPD, DM, hypoglycemia, and RF hospitalizations.

Treatment of COPD and COPD-heart failure comorbidity in primary care in different stages of the disease.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a chronic respiratory disease that may have a negative impact on both patients' quality of life and survival. Patients with COPD frequently suffer from heart failure (HF), likely owing to several shared risk factors. To evaluate the differences in treatment of COPD with and without HF comorbidity according to COPD severity in the general practitioner setting. We conducted an observational, retrospective study using data obtained from the Italian Health Search Database, which collects information generated by the routine activity of general practitioners. The study sample included 225 patients with COPD, alone or combined with HF. It has been found that the prevalence of some comorbidities such as diabetes and HF significantly increases with the severity of COPD. Regarding pharmacological treatment, a reduction in the prescription of individually administered long-acting β 2-agonists (LABAs) and long-acting anticholinergics (LAMAs) has been observed with increasing severity of the disease. Moreover, an increase in the prescription of both the combination of the two bronchodilators (LABA + LAMA) and their association with inhaled corticosteroids has been observed with increasing severity of COPD. The prescription of β-blockers in patients with COPD suffering from HF comorbidity decreases from 100% in stage I to less than 50% in the other stages of COPD. This study shows that general practitioners do not follow the guidelines recommendations for the management of patients with COPD in the different stages of the disease, with and without HF comorbidity, as well as in the management of HF. Further efforts must be made to ensure adequate treatment for these patients.

P259 Adherence to optimal medical therapy in Asian patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with PCI

Abstract On Behalf SingCLOUD collaborators Background Notable regional differences have been observed worldwide in clinical characteristics and outcomes in patients experiencing acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Asian patients present younger and report higher adverse outcomes rates compared to Western cohorts. The reasons are multifactorial, but adherence to medication prescription guidelines is one of the modifiable factors. Purpose Our aim was to study the effect of physician adherence to Optimal Medical Therapy (OMT) prescription guidelines on a MACE outcome in a high-risk group of Asian AMI patients over 1 year following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Method Data for this retrospective study was from the Singapore Cardiac Longitudinal Outcomes Database (SingCLOUD) pilot study involving AMI patients surviving primary PCI at two tertiary centers from 2012 to 2013. Guideline-directed OMT adherence was defined as concurrent prescription of at least one statin plus dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT – aspirin plus P2Y12-I). Prescription of β-blockers and ACE-i/ARBs was also recorded. Prescription status and MACE (repeat MI, stroke, death) was recorded at discharge, 3, 6 and 9 months, and 1 year following the index discharge. The cumulative effect of OMT adherence at 3, 6, 9 months and 1 year post-discharge was studied by comparing risk of first MACE among patient groups with complete, partial and non-adherence to OMT prescription guidelines. Results 2,478 patients, 80.3% males, mean age 60.3 ± 11.7 years were studied. 1094 (44.1%) underwent primary PCI for STEMI. Single drug prescription at discharge for aspirin, P2Y12-I, and statins was 95, 97 and 95.8%, while prescription of β -blockers and ACE-inhibitors was 86.5 and 75.7%. Prescription of statins and aspirin declined gradually while P2Y12-I fell to 67.9% at 6mo and 47.6% at 1 year. Adherence to OMT declined from 92.3% at discharge to 82.1, 58.5, 56.1 and 40.3% at 3, 6, 9 months and 1 year, respectively. Of 342 (13.8%) occurrences of first MACE, 48.5% occurred within 3mo post-discharge. Complete adherence to OMT upon discharge significantly decreased risk of MACE at 3mo (OR = 0.066; 95% CI: 0.054-0.080; p &amp;lt; 0.001) and 12mo (OR = 0.017; 95% CI: 0.010-0.028; p &amp;lt; 0.001) relative to non-adherence. Conclusion Over the course of a year in this high-risk group of PCI-treated AMI patients, there was a reduction in prescription adherence to the minimally essential OMT. Complete OMT adherence is beneficial in reducing MACE. Interventions targeting reasons for non-adherence are important in improving patient outcomes. Abstract P259 Figure 1 - Medication over 1 year

Development of additive systemic effects when taking β-blockers in patients with glaucoma and concurrent chronic diseases

To assess the frequency and extent of adverse reactions at simultaneous local and systemic prescription of β-blockers to patients with glaucoma and systemic vascular pathology. The study included 112 patients that have been taking β-blockers for at least 6 months. The main group consisted of 39 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) in combination with cardiovascular disease; the first comparison group - 36 patients with POAG without systemic vascular pathology; the second comparison group - 37 patients with systemic vascular pathology without glaucoma. In the main and first comparison groups, double instillations of 0.5% timolol or 0.5% betaxolol were used as monotherapy. Adverse reactions to the long-term usage of β-blockers were found in 82% of the main group patients with cardiovascular diseases. They manifested as bradycardia or bronchospasm (38% patients), combination of bradycardia and vascular hypotension or bronchospasm (18%), or combination of 3-4 types of adverse reactions (26%); in the first and second comparison groups - in 36% and 30%, respectively (p<0.05). The most severe multifactorial adverse reactions developed due to long-term use of combinations of systemic and local β-blockers: 100 mg metoprolol or 10 mg bisoprolol with 0.5% timolol.

Low-Value Transthoracic Echocardiography, Healthcare Utilization, and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease.

The relationship between ordering frequency of rarely appropriate transthoracic echocardiograms on healthcare utilization and patient outcomes in coronary artery disease (CAD) is not known. Our objective was to investigate practice patterns of cardiologists who order a high frequency of low-value transthoracic echocardiograms in patients with CAD and whether practice behavior influences patient outcomes. A retrospective cohort of outpatient CAD patients was accrued by identifying patients with at least 1 visit to 1 of 35 Ontario-based cardiologists in the EchoWISELY randomized clinical trial (Will Inappropriate Scenarios for Echocardiography Lessen Significantly) control group. The main outcomes of interest were patient-level receipt of diagnostic tests, physician visits, medication prescriptions, and clinical outcomes at 1 year. Our cohort consisted of 3966 patients with CAD (mean [SD] age, 67.8 [12.0] years; 72% men), with an outpatient visit to 1 of 35 eligible cardiologists, stratified into 3 ordering tertiles. Patients of cardiologists in the top ordering tertile of rarely appropriate transthoracic echocardiograms had significantly lower odds of receiving the following services at 1 year compared with patients in the low ordering group: cholesterol assessment (odds ratio [OR], 0.77 [95% CI, 0.65-0.91]); hemoglobin A1c assessment (OR, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.66-0.94]); β-blocker prescription (OR, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.55-0.90]); and aldosterone receptor antagonist prescription (OR, 0.46 [95% CI, 0.22-0.98]). Patients of high ordering cardiologists had greater odds of all-cause mortality at 1 year (OR, 1.54 [95% CI, 1.04-2.28]), although all other outcomes were similar. Patients with CAD seen by cardiologist who ordered a high rate of rarely appropriate transthoracic echocardiograms were less likely to receive potentially high-value screening tests and evidence-based medications than low ordering cardiologists. URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02038101.

Beta-blocker use and mortality following ovarian cancer diagnosis: a population-based study

BackgroundPreclinical studies suggest that β-blockers could exhibit anticancer properties in ovarian cancer. Similar effects have also been reported in observational studies, but their results remain inconsistent and could be impaired by methodological limitations. This study aimed to investigate whether β-blocker use is associated with improved survival in ovarian cancer patients at the Belgian population level. MethodsWe conducted a population-based study by linking data of the Belgian Cancer Registry with medical claims data of the health insurance companies for patients diagnosed with ovarian cancer between 2004 and 2014. Information on ovarian-cancer-specific deaths was retrieved from mortality records collected by regional governments. Use of β-blockers was modelled as a time-varying covariate in Cox regression models to calculate adjusted hazards ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs) for the association between postdiagnostic β-blocker exposure and overall or cancer-specific survival (OS and CSS, respectively). Adjustments were made for age at diagnosis, year of diagnosis, comorbidities, cancer stage, and cancer treatments. ResultsIn our population of 6197 patients, 2373 patients (38%) had at least one prescription of β-blockers in the 5 years following diagnosis. Postdiagnostic exposure to β-blockers was associated with a significant decrease in OS (adjusted HR, 1.21; 95%CI 1.12;1.30; p < 0.001) and CSS (adjusted HR, 1.17; 95%CI 1.07;1.29; p < 0.001). Moreover, this association remained similar in dose–response analyses, in subgroup analyses (including by β-blocker selectivity types), and in sensitivity analyses. ConclusionIn this large nationwide cohort of ovarian cancer patients, β-blocker users had reduced survival.

Do β-adrenoreceptor blocking drugs associate with reduced risk of symptomatic osteoarthritis and total joint replacement in the general population? A primary care-based, prospective cohort study using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink

IntroductionTo investigate if β-adrenoreceptor blocking drug (β-blocker) prescription reduces the risk of knee or hip osteoarthritis, total joint replacement and analgesic prescription.SettingPrimary care.Methods and analysisThis is a cohort study using...