Globally, HIV rates among adolescents are increasing and suggest that sexually active adolescents should be regarded as a high-risk group for prevention efforts. In the U.S., racial disparities in adolescent HIV diagnoses persist. Combination HIV prevention interventions, which includes behavioral and biomedical strategies, has the potential to address these disparities. Extending the availability of PrEP to adolescents may: increase HIV testing, contribute to addressing relationship power imbalances that make it challenging for adolescents to negotiate safer sex, and link PrEP services with complementary health and support services. Adolescent PrEP was recently approved by the FDA, yet little is known about the psychosocial factors influencing adolescents’ willingness to use daily oral PrEP or other PrEP modalities (e.g., injectable PrEP). Religiosity (religious and spiritual orientations, beliefs, involvement, and behaviors that may or may not be congruent with a specific faith tradition) can profoundly impact well-being and sexual health decision-making among Black and Latino adolescents. However, little is known about the extent to which religiosity influences Black and Latino adolescents’ willingness to use PrEP. Understanding the relationships between adolescent religiosity and PrEP willingness may reveal potential targets for HIV prevention and provide insight into tailoring community-based interventions for minority adolescents. Who’s on Board is a community-based study to determine strategies for implementing PrEP among Black and Latino adolescents ages 13-17 years. We collected focus group data from adolescents, parents, and medical providers (n=65, 10 groups) and survey data from HIV-negative or status unknown Black and Latino adolescents (n=200). The survey assessed sexual health, PrEP willingness and preferences, psychosocial factors, and demographics. Data collection is 90% complete and will be completed September 2018. Multivariate analyses were used to examine predictors of PrEP willingness. 49% of the sample identified as male. 47.8% of the sample had ever heard of PrEP. 34% of the sample said they prefer daily oral PrEP, 13% prefer PrEP injections, and 14.7% prefer a PrEP implant. Reasons for preferring daily oral PrEP over other modalities included: “not liking needles”, “already take a daily pill”, and “pills are easy to take”. Reasons for preferring PrEP injections over other modalities included: “long lasting” and “would not have to take a pill everyday”. Reasons for preferring PrEP implant over other modalities included: “easier to hide”, and “safer”. Participants who were older (OR=1.22), male (OR=1.21), or had an STI in the past 6 months (OR=1.45) had higher odds of being willing to take PrEP. Compared to those with low religiosity, those with high religiosity were more likely to be willing to use PrEP (OR=1.14). To our knowledge, this study is one of the first to use a systems level approach to examine willingness to use PrEP among a community-based sample of adolescents. While the majority of the sample had heard of daily oral PrEP, interests and preferences for other PrEP modalities were present. Findings for religiosity suggest that different value systems may influence adolescent PrEP decision-making. Findings offer insight into PrEP preferences which may inform implementation efforts with adolescents.