Preoperative Speech Research Articles

Cochlea implantation in patients with superficial hemosiderosis

IntroductionSuperficial hemosiderosis is a sub-form of hemosiderosis in which the deposits of hemosiderin in the central nervous system damage the nerve cells. This form of siderosis is caused by chronic cerebral hemorrhages, especially subarachnoid hemorrhages. The diversity of symptoms depends on the respective damage to the brain, but in most of the cases it shows up as incipient unilateral or bilateral hearing loss, ataxia and signs of pyramidal tracts. We are investigating the question of whether cochlear implantation is a treatment option for patients with superficial hemosiderosis and which strategy of diagnostic procedure has to be ruled out preoperatively.Materials and methodsIn a tertiary hospital between 2009 and 2018, we examined (N = 5) patients with radiologically confirmed central hemosiderosis who suffered from profound hearing loss to deafness were treated with a cochlear implant (CI). We compared pre- and postoperative speech comprehension (Freiburg speech intelligibility test for monosyllables and HSM sentence test).ResultsSpeech understanding improved on average by 20% (monosyllabic test in the Freiburg speech intelligibility test) and by 40% in noise (HSM sentence test) compared to preoperative speech understanding with optimized hearing aids.DiscussionThe results show that patients with superficial siderosis benefit from CI with better speech understanding. The results are below the average for all postlingual deaf CI patients. Superficial siderosis causes neural damages, which explains the reduced speech understanding based on central hearing loss. It is important to correctly weigh the patient's expectations preoperatively and to include neurologists within the therapy procedure.

The impact of cochlear implantation on speech and language outcomes in children with asymmetric sensorineural hearing loss

IntroductionCochlear implantation (CI) is considered in children with asymmetric sensorineural hearing loss (ASHL), or severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss in one ear, and better hearing contralaterally. The benefits of a CI in these children are not well established. This study investigated the impact of unilateral CI on speech and language outcomes in pediatric patients with ASHL. MethodsThe retrospective chart review identified pediatric patients who underwent cochlear implantation for ASHL at a tertiary single center institution between 2014 and 2017. Children who underwent cochlear implantation in the poorer ear and maintained a hearing aid in the better ear were included, while children with cognitive impairment or prior cochlear nerve deficiency and auditory neuropathy were excluded. Speech and language measures were evaluated prior to implantation and at regular six-month intervals postoperatively. Ear specific Audiometry was evaluated at every visit and varied developmentally appropriate speech recognition tasks, including questionnaires, closed-set, and open-set measures, accounted for advancing childhood milestones. Specific measures of speech articulation, expressive and receptive language, and vocabulary were assessed including: Goldman Fristoe Test of Articulation (GFTA-3), Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals (CELF-P2 or CELF-5), Receptive One-Word Picture Vocabulary Test (ROWPVT) and Expressive One Word Picture Vocabulary Test (EOWPVT). The mean difference and standard deviation of speech and language outcomes at preoperative and postoperative evaluations were calculated. The change in outcomes were further assessed over each post-operative time point. ResultsTwenty-six children with asymmetric sensorineural hearing loss were included in the analysis, with 11 (42%) having bilateral enlarged vestibular aqueducts (EVA). At time of CI, unaided mean Pure Tone Average (PTA-4) for the better ear was 62Db HL, and worse ear was 92Db HL. There was an improvement in speech recognition in the implanted ear as expected. All preoperative speech and language evaluations were conducted within 7 months of cochlear implantation. Twenty-three patients had at least 1 postoperative re-evaluation. Fourteen children had preoperative and postoperative assessments with the same tool, with 13 patients (93%) showing improvement in at least 1 domain. For patients with repeated assessment within 12 months of surgery, we observed an average improvement in standard scores of: GFTA-3 (+11.2), CELF-P2 Core Language (+10.3), CELF-5 Core Language (+7.0), ROWPVT (+2.8) and EOWPVT (+4.5). Individual results are described. ConclusionImprovement in speech and language measures can be demonstrated in children undergoing unilateral cochlear implantation for asymmetric sensorineural hearing losses. These children, who are not typical CI candidates, can benefit from a CI in the poorer ear.

MicroRNA Profiling in the Perilymph of Cochlear Implant Patients: Identifying Markers that Correlate to Audiological Outcomes.

MicroRNA (miRNA) expression profiles from human perilymph correlate to post cochlear implantation (CI) hearing outcomes. The high inter-individual variability in speech perception among cochlear implant recipients is still poorly understood. MiRNA expression in perilymph can be used to characterize the molecular processes underlying inner ear disease and to predict performance with a cochlear implant. Perilymph collected during CI from 17 patients was analyzed using microarrays. MiRNAs were identified and multivariable analysis using consonant-nucleus-consonant testing at 6 and 18 months post implant activation was performed. Variables analyzed included age, gender, preoperative pure tone average (PTA), and preoperative speech discrimination (word recognition [WR]). Gene ontology analysis was performed to identify potential functional implications of changes in the identified miRNAs. Distinct miRNA profiles correlated to preoperative PTA and WR. Patients classified as poor performers showed downregulation of six miRNAs that potentially regulate pathways related to neuronal function and cell survival. Individual miRNA profiles can be identified in microvolumes of perilymph. Distinct non-coding RNA expression profiles correlate to preoperative hearing and postoperative cochlear implant outcomes.

Through-and-Through Dissection of the Soft Palate for Pharyngeal Flap Inset: A "Good-Fast-Cheap" Technique for Any Etiology of Velopharyngeal Incompetence.

Objective:To determine the efficacy and resource utilization of through-and-through dissection of the soft palate for pharyngeal flap inset for velopharyngeal incompetence (VPI) of any indication.Design:Retrospective review.Setting:Tertiary care center.Patients:Thirty patients were included. Inclusion criteria were diagnosis of severe VPI based on perceptual speech assessment, confirmed by nasoendoscopy or videofluoroscopy; VPI managed surgically with modified pharyngeal flap with through-and-through dissection of the soft palate; and minimum 6 months follow-up. Patients with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome were excluded.Intervention:Modified pharyngeal flap with through-and-through dissection of the soft palate.Main Outcome Measure(s):Velopharyngeal competence and speech assessed using the Speech-Language Pathologist 3 scale.Results:The median preoperative speech score was 11 of 13 (range, 7 to 13), which improved significantly to a median postoperative score of 1 of 13 (range 0-7; P < .001). Velopharyngeal competence was restored in 25 (83%) patients, borderline competence in 3 (10%), and VPI persisted in 2 (7%) patients. Complications included 1 palatal fistula that required elective revision and 1 mild obstructive sleep apnea that did not require flap takedown. Median skin-to-skin operative time was 73.5 minutes, and median length of stay (LOS) was 50.3 hours.Conclusions:This technique allows direct visualization of flap placement and largely restores velopharyngeal competence irrespective of VPI etiology, with low complication rates. Short operative time and LOS extend the value proposition, making this technique not only efficacious but also a resource-efficient option for surgical management of severe VPI.

Cochlear implant in prelingually hearing-impaired adults: prognostic factors and results.

SUMMARYObjectivesThe aim of present study is to evaluate the impact of prognostic factors on the outcome in a group of prelingually hearing-impaired patients submitted to cochlear implantation (CI) at an adult age.MethodsThis is a retrospective study on a cohort of prelingually severe-to-profound hearing-impaired patients cochlear implanted in adulthood and followed by a single audiology centre. We correlated post-CI results in term of speech perception with patients’ speech perception with hearing aids before implantation, history of progression of hearing loss (HL), and levels of education and cognition. The study group was composed of 49 patients.ResultsPost-CI open-set recognition score in silence and noise was significantly correlated with pre-CI open-set recognition score in silence and with background noise. Patients with a history of progression of HL gained significantly better results. Furthermore, we found higher improvements in patients with a higher level of education.ConclusionsPrelingually deafened patients implanted in adulthood achieved satisfactory results. Significantly better results were achieved by patients with better pre-operative speech perception scores, progressive HL and higher level of education.

Factors Influencing Speech Perception in Adults With a Cochlear Implant.

The primary objective of this study is to identify the biographic, audiologic, and electrode position factors that influence speech perception performance in adult cochlear implant (CI) recipients implanted with a device from a single manufacturer. The secondary objective is to investigate the independent association of the type of electrode (precurved or straight) with speech perception. In a cross-sectional study design, speech perception measures and ultrahigh-resolution computed tomography scans were performed in 129 experienced CI recipients with a postlingual onset of hearing loss. Data were collected between December 2016 and January 2018 in the Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. The participants received either a precurved electrode (N = 85) or a straight electrode (N = 44), all from the same manufacturer. The biographic variables evaluated were age at implantation, level of education, and years of hearing loss. The audiometric factors explored were preoperative and postoperative pure-tone average residual hearing and preoperative speech perception score. The electrode position factors analyzed, as measured from images obtained with the ultrahigh-resolution computed tomography scan, were the scalar location, angular insertion depth of the basal and apical electrode contacts, and the wrapping factor (i.e., electrode-to-modiolus distance), as well as the type of electrode used. These 11 variables were tested for their effect on three speech perception outcomes: consonant-vowel-consonant words in quiet tests at 50 dB SPL (CVC50) and 65 dB SPL (CVC65), and the digits-in-noise test. A lower age at implantation was correlated with a higher CVC50 phoneme score in the straight electrode group. Other biographic variables did not correlate with speech perception. Furthermore, participants implanted with a precurved electrode and who had poor preoperative hearing thresholds performed better in all speech perception outcomes than the participants implanted with a straight electrode and relatively better preoperative hearing thresholds. After correcting for biographic factors, audiometric variables, and scalar location, we showed that the precurved electrode led to an 11.8 percentage points (95% confidence interval: 1.4-20.4%; p = 0.03) higher perception score for the CVC50 phonemes compared with the straight electrode. Furthermore, contrary to our initial expectations, the preservation of residual hearing with the straight electrode was poor, as the median preoperative and the postoperative residual hearing thresholds for the straight electrode were 88 and 122 dB, respectively. Cochlear implantation with a precurved electrode results in a significantly higher speech perception outcome, independent of biographic factors, audiometric factors, and scalar location.

Isolated Incudostapedial Cholesteatomas: Unique Radiologic and Surgical Features

Congenital cholesteatomas originate from epithelial tissue present within the middle ear in patients with an intact tympanic membrane, no history of otologic surgery, otorrhea, or tympanic membrane perforation. They are diagnosed by a pearl-like lesion on otoscopy and computed tomography (CT) scan showing an expansile soft-tissue mass. We describe a series of patients with no prior otologic history presenting with progressive unilateral conductive hearing loss and normal otoscopy. The CT scans showed ossicular erosion without obvious soft-tissue mass. Surgery confirmed incudostapedial erosion found to be cholesteatoma. In this study, we characterize the clinical course of patients diagnosed with isolated incudostapedial cholesteatoma (IIC) and review possible pathologic mechanisms. Retrospective review of IIC cases treated by the Department of Pediatric Otolaryngology, Rady Children's Hospital, San Diego, 2014 to 2020. Data included patient demographics, clinical features, imaging, surgical findings, and audiologic data. Five patients were diagnosed with IIC (3 [60%] female; mean age at presentation 10.7 years [range 5.5-16.0]). All patients presented with postlingual unilateral conductive hearing loss and normal otoscopy without any past otologic history; delay in diagnosis ranged from 4 months to several years. The CT scans showed ossicular chain erosion with an absent long process of the incus and/or stapes superstructure. All patients underwent middle ear exploration, revealing a thin layer of cholesteatoma in the incudostapedial region, confirmed by histopathology. Mean preoperative speech reception threshold was 55 dB and improved to a mean of 31 dB in the 4 patients who underwent ossicular chain reconstruction. Isolated incudostapedial cholesteatoma should be included as a possible etiology in pediatric patients with insidious onset of unilateral conductive hearing loss with normal otoscopy, unremarkable otologic history, and a CT scan showing ossicular abnormality/disruption without notable middle ear mass. These patients should be counseled preoperatively regarding the possibility of cholesteatoma and should undergo middle ear exploration with possible ossiculoplasty.

Systematic Review on Late Cochlear Implantation in Early-Deafened Adults and Adolescents: Predictors of Performance.

Early-deafened, late-implanted adolescents and adults constitute a unique group of cochlear implant (CI) users, showing a large variability in outcomes. The current systematic review aimed to determine which preimplantation factors are relevant in predicting postoperative outcomes in this patient group. A systematic search for studies published between 2000 and September 2017 was performed in five electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane library, CINAHL, and PsycInfo). Prognostic studies that assessed the relation between patient-related factors and CI outcomes in early-deafened but late-implanted adolescent and adult CI users were included. Study quality was assessed with the Quality In Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool. The systematic search and subsequent full-text evaluation identified 13 studies that had a clear prognostic study goal. Eight out of these 13 studies had a high risk of bias for at least one of the five QUIPS domains. Analysis of the outcomes identified that communication mode (in childhood), preoperative speech intelligibility, and preoperative speech recognition scores were significantly related to speech perception outcomes for this group of CI users. A number of additional factors considered worth for further investigation were also identified. The analysis of the studies assessing the effect of a number of patient-related factors on outcome with CI in early-deafened adolescents and adults identified three potential prognostic factors and a number of additional factors to be incorporated in future research. More high-quality prognosis studies in the investigated patient population are still needed.

Benefits of a Hearing Registry: Cochlear Implant Candidacy in Quiet Versus Noise in 1,611 Patients.

Purpose This retrospective study used a cochlear implant registry to determine how performing speech recognition candidacy testing in quiet versus noise influenced patient selection, speech recognition, and self-report outcomes. Method Database queries identified 1,611 cochlear implant recipients who were divided into three implant candidacy qualifying groups based on preoperative speech perception scores (≤ 40% correct) on the AzBio sentence test: quiet qualifying group, +10 dB SNR qualifying group, and +5 dB SNR qualifying group. These groups were evaluated for demographic and preoperative hearing characteristics. Repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to compare pre- and postoperative performance on the AzBio in quiet and noise with qualifying group as a between-subjects factor. For a subset of recipients, pre- to postoperative changes on the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale were also evaluated. Results Of the 1,611 patients identified as cochlear implant candidates, 63% of recipients qualified in quiet, 10% qualified in a +10 dB SNR, and 27% qualified in a +5 dB SNR. Postoperative speech perception scores in quiet and noise significantly improved for all qualifying groups. Across qualifying groups, the greatest speech perception improvements were observed when tested in the same qualifying listening condition. For a subset of patients, the total Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale ratings improved significantly as well. Conclusion Patients who qualified for cochlear implantation in quiet or background noise test conditions showed significant improvement in speech perception and quality of life scores, especially when the qualifying noise condition was used to track performance.

Primary Pharyngeal Flap With Palate Repair Improves Speech Outcome in Older Children and Adults: A Comparative Study.

Repair of cleft palate after 6 years of age is controversial in regard to the surgical procedure and the speech outcome. Primary repair alone may not be considered sufficient to achieve intelligible speech. The authors consider addition of pharyngeal flap at the time of primary repair to be a significant factor in improving speech. Prospectively maintained data of all cleft palate patients operated from 2013 to 2017 (5 years) was analyzed to identify patients older than 6 years. Complete cleft palate, incomplete cleft palate, and cleft of the soft palate were further stratified according to different Randall types. They were divided into 2 main types: primary palate repair only and primary palate repair with pharyngeal flap. Speech was assessed preoperatively and 12 months postoperatively by Pittsburgh weighted speech scale. A total of 139 patients were analyzed. There were 78 males and 61 females. Their ages ranged from 6 to 60 years (mean age, 12.5 years). The overall preoperative speech score in palate repair-only group was 12.15, whereas the postoperative score was 7.32. In patients who underwent primary pharyngeal flap along with palate repair, the preoperative speech score was 11.3, and the postoperative score was 3.76. In select group of patients who report late for palate repair, addition of pharyngeal flap along with the primary palate repair improves the speech outcome in all Randall groups.

Audiological Research Methods in the Diagnosis of Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction

Introduction. faring loss may be a predictor or a kind of catalyst for cognitive disorders. This may indicate that audiological research methods can take their place in the diagnosis of cognitive impairments or in assessing the risk of their occurrence. The aim is to determine the sensitivity and specificity of audiological methods for the diagnosis of postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD). Material and methods . The study involved 40 patients (17 women and 23 men) aged 22 to 77 years. All patients underwent planned abdominal surgery or reconstructive operations on the vessels of the lower extremities using different types of anesthesia. Before and after the operation, all patients underwent neuropsychological assessment of their cognitive status and audiological examination (otoscopy, tonal threshold audiometry, speech tests). Results. The hearing thresholds in a tonal audiometry in all young patients were within normal limits. Peripheral hearing loss was detected in 11,8% of middle-aged patients and 81,8% of the elderly. Initial cognitive impairment based on the results of the MoCA test was also most often observed in a group of elderly patients. POCD was diagnosed in 63,6% of elderly patients, 35,3% of middle-aged and 8,3% of young patients. The results of preoperative speech testing revealed pronounced signs of a deficit in central processing of acoustic information in patients of all age groups. In all elderly patients, there were deviations in at least one of the speech tests, and in 63,6% ofpatients — in both tests (dichotic, RuMatrix). The high sensitivity of speech tests to the assessment of the probability of occurrence of POCD was revealed: for the dichotic test, the sensitivity was 85,7%, for the RuMatrix test 78,6%. Conclusions. Speech audiological tests are highly sensitive, which makes it appropriate to use them at the stage of preoperative diagnosis. Identify deviations from the norm in both speech tests at the preoperative stage may indicate a high probability of development of POCD.

Late Primary Palatoplasty in Skeletally Mature Patients: Obstacles and Outcomes

As the performance of late primary palatoplasty for skeletally mature patients remains controversial, there is little data available regarding speech outcomes for this patient population. The purpose of this study therefore is to identify and evaluate the impact of speech outcomes following late palate repair on skeletally mature patients. A retrospective study was performed on 19 consecutive skeletally mature patients who underwent late primary palate repair between 2010 and 2018. Speech assessment was performed preoperatively, between 3 and 6 months postoperatively, and then after 6 months postoperatively. Levels for hypernasality, oral pressure, and audible nasal air emission were scored and recorded.Patients were stratified by age, gender, presence of postoperative fistula, and Veau cleft type, in order to determine the impact of each variable on final speech outcomes. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare the preoperative speech assessment with the postoperative speech outcomes, and the Mann-Whitney test was used to analyze the impact of the above variables on final speech outcomes. Our data showed overall postoperative speech improvement for all tested variables. Patients without postoperative fistula presented better results in oral pressure than those patients with postoperative fistula (P < 0.05). None of the other tested variables presented a significant negative impact on speech outcomes. Late primary palatoplasty significantly improves speech outcomes for skeletally mature patients. Fistula has a negative impact on oral pressure.

The effects of thalamic and posterior subthalamic deep brain stimulation on speech in patients with essential tremor – A prospective, randomized, doubleblind crossover study

ObjectiveTo prospectively evaluate the effect of PSA- and VIM DBS on speech in ET patients. MethodsLeads were implanted bilaterally with contacts placed in both VIM and PSA. Thirteen patients were analyzed pre- and postoperatively. Preoperative speech of ET patients was compared to healthy controls. PSA- and VIM-DBS were evaluated in a randomized, double-blind crossover phase. ResultsAt preoperative baseline, we found reduced intelligibility. Differences in acoustic and VAS data (‘ability to speak’) compared to controls were gradient. Articulation rate could be predicted by disease duration. Decreased articulation rate, spirantization and voicing were found for PSA- and VIM-DBS. Targets did not differ in terms of speech deterioration. ConclusionSpeech in ET patients without DBS can be impaired, dependent on patient’s individual characteristics. Both PSA- and VIM-DBS affect speech in a comparable way. Thus, the PSA can be considered an alternative DBS target in ET without higher risk of dysarthria.

Endoscopic tympanoplasty with inlay cartilage graft in an university hospital

IntroductionTympanoplasty is the surgical procedure aimed at the reconstruction of the tympanic membrane and restoration of the sound conducting mechanism. It can be performed with several types of access and grafts and is considered successful when it achieves complete closure of the tympanic perforation and sound conduction improvement. ObjectiveTo describe the prevalence of successful closure of tympanic perforations and auditory results of endoscopic tympanoplasty with an inlay tragus cartilage graft. MethodsRetrospective study developed at a tertiary referral hospital. Patients with central tympanic perforations and intact ossicular chains operated with endoscopic tympanoplasty with inlay tragus cartilage graft were included. The neo-tympanum integrity index was evaluated, and the preoperative and postoperative auditory parameters were compared using the paired Student's t-test. ResultsWe identified 83 endoscopic tympanoplasties with inlay cartilage, of which 63 (76 %) had an intact neo-tympanum and 20 (24 %) had residual perforations. The preoperative air-bone gap was, on average, 18 ± 8.9 dBHL, and the postoperative 11 ± 10 dBHL (p = 0.0005), showing reduction in 71 % and complete recovery in 27 %. The mean preoperative speech recognition threshold was 35 ± 13.5 and the postoperative SRT was 27 ± 14.4 (p = 0.0002). The preoperative tritonal mean was 34 ± 14.3 and the postoperative was 24 ± 15 (p = 0.0002). ConclusionIn this series, endoscopic tympanoplasties with inlay tragus cartilage graft showed a 76 % prevalence of complete closure of the tympanic perforation, with significant improvement in the auditory parameters.

Surgical Outcomes for the Treatment of Velopharyngeal Insufficiency in 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome.

This study aimed to compare outcomes of concomitant palatoplasty and sphincter pharyngoplasty with pharyngeal flap and sphincter pharyngoplasty alone for the treatment of velopharyngeal insufficiency in patients with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. Thirty-one cases were identified for inclusion in the study. Patients were separated into 3 surgical groups: combined palatoplasty and sphincter pharyngoplasty (n = 11), pharyngeal flap (n = 7), and sphincter pharyngoplasty (n = 13). Outcome measures included perceptual speech analyses, surgical complications, and revision rates. There were no differences in preoperative speech analysis scores (P = .31). The combined palatoplasty and sphincter pharyngoplasty procedure had similar speech outcomes compared to pharyngeal flap, and both were significantly better than sphincter pharyngoplasty alone. Complication rates (P = .61) and the need for revision surgery (P = .25) were similar among all 3 groups. Concomitant palatoplasty and sphincter pharyngoplasty may be an alternative treatment for velopharyngeal insufficiency in children with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome.

Speech intelligibility in patients with oral cancer: An objective baseline evaluation of pretreatment function and impairment.

This study seeks to identify those factors that influence the pre-therapeutic speech intelligibility in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). A group of 172 patients (125 males, 47 females, mean age = 61 ± 11 a) with different OSCC stages ranging from T1 to T4 and N0 to N2 was examined for their speech intelligibility using a computerized measuring tool, and compared to a healthy reference group (30 males, 10 females, mean age = 59 ± 12 a). It was found that the pre-therapeutic speech intelligibility in patients with OSCC is decreased when compared to a healthy collective. Two demographic factors that influence speech intelligibility could be identified: sex and age. It was determined that the only disease-related factor that influences speech intelligibility before therapy is the location of the tumor. The results of this study reveal that a preoperative speech intelligibility impairment in patients suffering from OSCC occurs independent of tumor stage, size of the tumor and infiltration status.

Neurocognitive Factors Contributing to Cochlear Implant Candidacy

Clinical adult cochlear implant (CI) candidacy evaluations rely heavily on measures of sentence recognition under the best-aided listening conditions. The hypothesis tested in this study was that nonauditory measures of neurocognitive processes would contribute to scores on preoperative sentence recognition for CI candidates, above and beyond hearing ability as assessed using pure-tone average (PTA). Support for this hypothesis would suggest that best-aided sentence recognition is not simply a measure of hearing ability; rather, neurocognitive functions contribute to performance and should be considered while counseling patients during CI candidacy evaluation about postoperative rehabilitative and outcome expectations. Neurocognitive functions, such as working memory capacity, inhibition-concentration, information processing speed, and nonverbal reasoning contribute to aided speech recognition outcomes in adults with hearing loss. This study examined the roles of these neurocognitive factors on preoperative speech recognition performance in adults evaluated for CI candidacy. Thirty-one postlingually deafened adult CI candidates were enrolled. Participants were assessed using nonauditory measures of working memory capacity, inhibition-concentration, information processing speed, and nonverbal reasoning. Measures of sentence recognition in quiet and in multitalker babble (AzBio sentences) as well as sentences from the City University of New York in quiet were collected under best-aided conditions. AzBio sentence recognition scores in babble were predicted significantly by scores of working memory capacity after accounting for PTA. Similarly, the City University of New York sentence recognition scores were predicted significantly by nonverbal reasoning after accounting for PTA. Findings support the idea that clinical measures of sentence recognition may be affected to varying degrees by neurocognitive functions, and these functions should be considered during evaluation for CI candidacy.

Successful hearing improvement with direct acoustic stimulation in a patient with schizophrenia

A direct acoustic cochlear implant provides its power directly to the inner ear by vibrating the perilymph via a conventional stapes prosthesis. Our experience with a patient with severe mixed hearing loss due to otosclerosis is described.Case reportThe patient, a 47-year-old male, had a pre-operative speech recognition score of 10 per cent and had been treated for many years for schizophrenia, both of which made him a poor candidate for a direct acoustic stimulation device. Nevertheless, the surgery was performed, which preserved the pre-operative bone conduction level and significantly improved hearing. His speech recognition score rose to 100 per cent. He uses the device all day and his auditory hallucinations have subsided. Improvement of schizophrenia symptoms has enabled the patient to reduce his psychiatric medications intake. Hearing restoration was the main reason for the reduction of auditory hallucinations in our patient. Hearing loss is a potentially reversible risk factor for psychosis, but this association is often overlooked.

Evidence-Based Inclusion Criteria for Cochlear Implantation in Patients With Postlingual Deafness.

This study determined the relationship between preoperative phoneme and word scores and the gain in speech perception after cochlear implantation in a large cohort of patients. The authors aimed to define evidence-based selection criteria for cochlear implantations in adults with postlingual deafness. This retrospective study included 364 adults with postlingual deafness who received a cochlear implant between 2000 and 2013 at the Leiden University Medical Center. The gain in speech perception observed postimplantation was compared with preoperative-aided/binaural speech perception scores, measured at 65 dB SPL in quiet. Patients who showed preoperative phoneme scores on monosyllabic words above 50% were also tested for speech perception in the presence of speech-shaped background noise, at a +5 dB signal to noise ratio. Speech perception in quiet improved after implantation in all except 7 patients. Average scores in quiet continued to improve, up to approximately 1 year after implantation. When participants were divided into five groups, based on preoperative speech perception scores, all groups showed gains in speech perception, except for the group with aided preoperative phoneme scores above 80%. However, all patients who were tested preoperatively with the addition of background noise showed improvements in speech perception in noise after the cochlear implantation. Although the decision to implant should consider individual ear differences and other factors that might apply to a particular case, based on our data, all patients with preoperative scores of either 80% (phonemes correct) or 60% (words correct) and lower in an optimal-aided situation are potential candidates for a cochlear implant, provided that their preoperative speech perception score decreases below 50% (phonemes correct) or 20% (words correct), when background noise is added at a +5 dB signal to noise ratio.

Cochlear implantation and early outcomes in children with incompletely partition type Ⅲ malformation

Objective:To analyze the early effect of the cochlear implantation (CI) in children with cochlear incompletely partition type Ⅲ malformation (IP-Ⅲ). Method:Ten children with IP-Ⅲ malformation who underwent CI were recruited in this study. The hearing characteristics, preoperative speech performance and surgery were analyzed retrospectively. The aided hearing threshold with CI, the categories of auditory performance (CAP) score, speech intelligibility rating (SIR) score and speech perception were designed to access the benefits of CI. Ten children with normal cochlea were also enrolled as the control group. Demographic information of children in the control group including hearing loss and speech level before implantation, age at implantation, hearing aids using history, duration with CI were matched with those in the IP-Ⅲ group. The hearing threshold, CAP score and SIR score in the IP-Ⅲ group were compared with the control group using the SPSS 20.0 software. Result:The computed tomography of temporal bones showed typical IP-Ⅲ malformation in all patients. The electrode arrays were properly and totally implanted in all children. Cerebrospinal fluid gusher occurred intra-operatively, and no other complications in all patients. The pure tone average (PTA) threshold at the 3rd, 6th, 9th and 12th month after implantation were (40.8±8.5) dB HL, (36.1±9.1) dB HL, (32.5±6.8) dB HL and (33.0±7.3) dB HL, respectively. The PTA thresholds in the IP-Ⅲ group were similar to those in the control group at all tested time points (P>0.05). At the 3rd, 6th, 9th and 12th month after implantation, the CAP scores in the IP-Ⅲ group were lower than those in the control group, but there was no significantly difference (P>0.05). Furthermore, the SIR scores were lower than those in the control group, and there were significantly difference at the 6 th, 9 th and 12 th month after implantation (P<0.05). Conclusion:CI was an effective treatment for children with IP-Ⅲ malformation. Surgery on IP-Ⅲ was challenging, however, seldom complication would occur with excellent surgical skills. Though the CI was benefit for IP-Ⅲ, the development of hearing and speech ability were slower than children with normal cochlea.