Preoperative Speech Research Articles

Unmet educational needs and expectations among tracheostomy recipients

ObjectiveThis study seeks to better understand unmet educational needs and treatment expectations in individuals with a tracheostomy. Study designRetrospective, cross-sectional survey. MethodsA survey was distributed to individuals who received a tracheostomy at a tertiary care center in the last five years as well as in Facebook support groups for tracheostomy and head and neck cancer patients. The survey focused on tracheostomy education, satisfaction with care, and gaps in treatment plan understanding. Primary outcome was rate of tracheostomy peri-operative experience being on-par with expectations. ResultsAmong 83 respondents, only report of pre-operative speech (p = 0.024) and swallow (p = 0.019) discussions were associated with peri-operative experience being on-par with expectations. Respondents were more likely to report importance of counseling regarding psychological well-being (p < 0.001) and post-operative social integration/interaction (p < 0.001) than they were to report receiving focused counseling about these topics. Qualitative analysis demonstrated the most frequently missing components of understanding of treatment plans included post-operative care and the post-operative experience (n = 19, 40.4 % each). Reasons for treatment not meeting expectations included lack of communication/education (n = 15, 39.5 %) and experience being worse than expected (n = 8, 21.1 %). Individuals frequently wanted more details of the experience of living with a tracheostomy (n = 25, 42.6 %) and details about tracheostomy care (n = 10, 16.4 %). ConclusionThis study demonstrates significant gaps in informational needs for individuals receiving a tracheostomy, emphasizing the importance of guideline-directed tracheostomy counseling. Specifically, more information is needed regarding expected post-surgical experience, tracheostomy care and maintenance, psychosocial wellbeing, and communication support.

EFFECTIVE APPROACHES TO ENHANCING CONNECTED SPEECH IN PREOPERATIVE CHILDREN WITH OPEN ORGANIC RHINOLALIA

Children with open organic rhinolalia, a condition often resulting from structural anomalies such as cleft palate, face unique challenges in speech development, particularly in the preoperative period. This article examines the methods, techniques, and strategies used to improve connected speech in these children before undergoing surgical intervention. Focusing on evidence-based practices, the article explores various speech therapy approaches, including breathing exercises, articulation drills, and resonance training, all tailored to address the specific needs of children with hypernasal speech. The goal of preoperative speech therapy is not only to prepare children for surgery but also to enhance their overall communication skills by developing more transparent and fluent speech. By reviewing current research and case studies, this article provides insights into effective treatment methods that can be applied in clinical settings to support children with open organic rhinolalia.

Reducing Length of Stay in Reconstructive Head and Neck Surgery Patients: A Quality Improvement Initiative.

To investigate whether a new preoperative education and discharge planning protocol reduced unexpected discharge delays for patients undergoing reconstructive surgery for head and neck cancer. A quality improvement (QI) intervention was implemented in January 2021 with several components to address historically prolonged observed lengths of stay (LOS) with head and neck cancer patients. The intervention added a preoperative educational visit with a head and neck cancer advanced practice provider, a standardized preoperative speech and swallow assessment, a personalized patient care plan document, discussion of inpatient hospital stay expectations, and early discharge planning. The intervention group included patients who underwent the preoperative education protocol from February to December 2021. For comparison, an age and sex-matched control group was constructed from inpatients who had been admitted for similar procedures in the 2 years prior to the QIintervention (2019-2020) and received standard of care counseling. Our study demonstrated a significant reduction in observed to expected LOSratio after implementation of the intervention (1.24 ± 0.74 control, 0.95 ± 0.52 intervention; P = .012). We discuss a preoperative education QI intervention at our institution. Our findings demonstrate that our intervention was associated with decreased LOS for patients undergoing head and neck reconstructive surgeries. This QI study shows the benefit of a new standardized preoperative education and discharge planning protocol for patients undergoing head and neck reconstructive surgeries.

Intraoperative Hearing Monitoring Using ABR and TT-ECochG and Hearing Preservation during Vestibular Schwannoma Resection.

Background: Quick and appropriate diagnostics and the use of intraoperative monitoring (IM) of hearing during vestibular schwannoma (VS) resection increase the likelihood of hearing preservation. During surgery, various methods of IM can be used, i.e., auditory brainstem responses (ABRs), transtympanic electrocochleography (TT-ECochG), and direct cochlear nerve action potentials. The aim of the study was to evaluate the prognostic values of IM of hearing using ABR and TT-ECochG in predicting postoperative hearing preservation and to evaluate relationships between them during various stages of surgery. Methods: This retrospective study presents the pre- and postoperative audiological test results and IM of hearing records (TT-ECochG and ABR) in 75 (43 women, 32 men, aged 18-69) patients with diagnosed VS. Results: The preoperative pure tone average hearing threshold was 25.02 dB HL, while after VS resection, it worsened on average by 30.03 dB HL. According to the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS) Hearing Classification, before and after (pre/post) surgery, there were 47/24 patients in hearing class A, 9/8 in B, 2/1 in C, and 17/42 in D. In speech audiometry, the average preoperative speech discrimination score at an intensity of 60 dB SPL was 70.93%, and after VS resection, it worsened to 38.93%. The analysis of electrophysiological tests showed that before the tumor removal the I-V ABR interlatencies was 5.06 ms, and after VS resection, it was 6.43 ms. Conclusions: The study revealed correlations between worse postoperative hearing and changes in intraoperatively measured ABR and TT-ECochG. IM of hearing is very useful in predicting postoperative hearing in VS patients and increases the chance of postoperative hearing preservation in these patients.

Factors influencing speech improvement following maxillary complete-arch implant-supported restorations: A retrospective study.

This study explored factors affecting speech improvement in patients with an edentulous maxilla after the delivery of a complete-arch implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis (IFDP). Patients who had received IFDP for edentulous maxilla were enrolled, and various potential speech improvement-related factors were considered, including patient demographics, anterior residual bone volume, preoperative facial features, preoperative acoustic parameters, and adaptation time. Acoustic analysis and perceptual ratings were used to assess three fricatives [s], [f], and [ɕ]. Correlation and regression analyses were conducted to assess the association between changes in fricatives and potential factors (α = .05). The study included 50 patients (18 females and 32 males, aged 50.62 ± 15.71 years, range 19-76). Significant correlations were found among the change in the center of gravity (ΔCoG) of [s] and anterior residual bone volume, zygomatic implants number and proportion (p < .05). These correlations were largely mirrored in the perceptual score (ΔPS) changes. After controlling for age, sex, preoperative acoustic parameters, and adaptation time, the ΔCoG and ΔPS of fricatives were mainly correlated with the anterior residual bone volume, preoperative acoustic parameters, and adaptation time. Speech improvements post-IFDP delivery are mainly related to preoperative speech characteristics, anterior residual bone volume, and adaptation time. The residual bone volume's impact on consonants varies with specific articulatory gestures. This study provides insights into forecasting speech outcomes following IFDP restoration and provides recommendations and methods for data collection in developing future prediction models.

Simultaneous versus Sequential Cochlear Implantation in Adults: Quantitative and Qualitative Outcomes.

To compare speech recognition and quality of life outcomes between bilateral sequentially and simultaneously implanted adult cochlear implant (CI) recipients who initially qualify for a CI in both ears. Retrospective chart review. Tertiary referral center. Retrospective chart review identified adults who underwent bilateral CI, either simultaneously or sequentially, at a high-volume center between 2012 and 2022. Sequentially implanted patients were only included if the second ear qualified for CI in quiet (defined as best-aided AzBio quiet testing <60%), at time of initial CI evaluation. Of 112 bilateral CI patients who qualified in both ears at initial evaluation, 95 underwent sequential implantation and 17 simultaneous. Age, duration, and etiology of hearing loss, and CI usage were similar between groups. Preoperatively, the sequential group had lower pure-tone average (PTA) in the 1st ear than the simultaneously implanted group (P = <.001) but, no difference in 2nd ear PTA (P = .657). Preoperative speech recognition scores were significantly higher for the sequential group; however, this was not true for postoperative scores. There was no difference in the proportion of patients showing significant CI-only or bilateral performance improvement between the groups. Both groups demonstrated similar benefit in quality of life measures. Our findings indicate both simultaneous and sequential cochlear implantation are effective in improving hearing performance and quality of life. Thus, bilateral versus simultaneous implantation should be discussed and tailored for each individual patient.

Clinical characteristics and hearing loss etiology of cochlear implantees undergoing surgery in their teens, 20s, and 30s

PurposeThis study aimed to investigate the etiology of hearing loss, including genetic variants, in individuals who underwent cochlear implantation (CI) in their teens to thirties. It also sought to analyze post-CI speech performance and identify prognostic factors affecting CI outcomes in this age group.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective review of 421 cochlear implant patients at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, focusing on 63 subjects aged 10–39 years who underwent their first CI by a single surgeon between July 2018 and June 2022. The study included audiologic evaluation, molecular genetic testing, and analysis of speech performance post-CI. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 25 and GraphPad Prism 7.ResultsAmong 63 participants (M:F, 24:39), nine underwent CI in their teens, 24 in their 20 s, and 30 in their 30 s. Most of them (40, 63.5%) had postlingual deafness. The study found that 65.2% (40/63) of subjects received a genetic diagnosis, with DFNB4 being the most common etiology (37.5%, 15/40). Post-CI speech evaluation showed an average sentence score of 80% across all subjects. Factors such as the onset of hearing loss, duration of deafness (DoD), and preoperative Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR) significantly influenced CI outcomes. Notably, longer DoD was associated with poorer CI outcomes, but this did not affect individuals with postlingual hearing loss as much.ConclusionThe study concludes that in individuals aged 10–39 undergoing CI, the onset of hearing loss and preoperative SIR are critical predictors of postoperative outcomes. CI is recommended for those with postlingual hearing loss in this age group, irrespective of the DoD. The study highlights the importance of genetic factors especially DFNB4 in hearing loss etiology and underscores the value of the relatively easy-to-evaluate factor, preoperative SIR in predicting CI outcomes.

Oval and round window reinforcement surgery leads to improvements in sound tolerance and quality of life for hyperacusis patients

PurposeHyperacusis is an audiological disorder in which patients become persistently sensitive and intolerant to everyday environmental sounds. For those patients that fail conservative options, a minimally invasive surgical procedure has been developed. Materials & methodsRetrospective case series of 73 adult patients with hyperacusis who underwent oval and round window reinforcement surgery between 1/2017–6/2023. Small pieces of temporalis fascia were used to reinforce the round and oval windows. Patients were separated into two groups based on their preoperative speech Loudness Discomfort Level (LDL). Patients with a preoperative speech LDL ≤ 70 dB were placed in the “low LDL group” whereas patients with a preoperative speech LDL >70 dB were placed in the “high LDL group.” Preoperative and one-week postoperative audiogram and speech LDLs were compared. Quality of life was assessed using the Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI) survey. Results73 patients met inclusion criteria - 21 patients in the low LDL group and 52 in the high LDL group. Patients in the high LDL group significantly improved their LDLs by an average of 3.5 dB (P < 0.0001). 42 patients (80.8 %) in the high LDL group had improvement and would recommend the surgery for hyperacusis. Patients in the low LDL group significantly improved their LDL by an average of 12.9 dB (P = 0.032). Ten patients (47.6 %) from the low LDL group experienced improvement and would recommend hyperacusis surgery. ConclusionMany patients with hyperacusis who undergo oval and round window reinforcement can receive significant improvement in sound tolerance and quality of life. Patients with a pre-op speech LDL > 70 dB have the greatest potential for improvement with surgery (80.8 %), probably because their hyperacusis was less severe. In the high LDL group(>70dB) the improvement in 1-10 scale went from 8.6 pre-op to 2.4 post op. In the low LDL group(<70dB) went from 9.2 pre-op to 6.8 post-op. These findings were consistent with the GBI results.

Evolving a Model for Cochlear Implant Outcome.

Cochlear implantation is an efficient treatment for postlingually deafened adults who do not benefit sufficiently from acoustic amplification. Implantation is indicated when it can be foreseen that speech recognition with a cochlear implant (CI) is superior to that with a hearing aid. Especially for subjects with residual speech recognition, it is desirable to predict CI outcome on the basis of preoperative audiological tests. The purpose of the study was to extend and refine a previously developed model for CI outcome prediction for subjects with preoperative word recognition to include subjects with no residual hearing by incorporating additional results of routine examinations. By introducing the duration of unaided hearing loss (DuHL), the median absolute error (MAE) of the prediction was reduced. While for subjects with preoperative speech recognition, the model modification did not change the MAE, for subjects with no residual speech recognition before surgery, the MAE decreased from 23.7% with the previous model to 17.2% with the extended model. Prediction of word recognition with CI is possible within clinically relevant limits. Outcome prediction is particularly important for preoperative counseling and in CI aftercare to support systematic monitoring of CI fitting.

Extended preoperative speech audiometric diagnostics for cochlear implant treatment

For severe hearing loss and even profound deafness, cochlear implants (CIs) have become the treatment of choice. For establishment of the CI indication, the preoperative Freiburger monosyllabic word recognition (EV) at 65 dB SPL in free field with ahearing aid (EVHG65) and the maximal understanding (mEV) without ahearing aid with headphones results are important. The goal of this retrospective study was to analyse the correlation of word recognition with ahearing aid at 80 dB SPL (EVHG80) and mEV. This represents an extension to measuring EVHG65 compared to mEV and to pure-tone audiometry (4FPTA). In this study, word recognition with and without ahearing aid was retrospectively analysed for 661ears. Inclusion criterium was CI implantation at alater date. During preoperative CI diagnostics, an mEV of 0% was found in334 ears. The EVHG65 for 485ears and the EVHG80 for 335ears were also 0%. The EV with hearing aid was found to worsen with increasing 4FPTA at both sound pressure levels, although this effect was smaller at 80 dB SPL than at 65 dB SPL. Including only ears with mEV > 0 % (N = 260 ears), astronger correlation between EVHG80 and mEV with adifference of (-4.0 ± 16.4%) in comparison to EVHG65 and mEV with adifference of (-18.3 ± 16.7%) is seen. This shows asignificant difference between mEV and EVHG80 compared to mEV and EVHG65. At asound pressure level of 65 dB SPL, EV with hearing aid often does not show the accordance with mEV specified by hearing aid and CI guidelines. The EVHG80 correlates better with mEV than EVHG65. For clinical diagnosis it is rational to measure speech discrimination with hearing aid at levels higher than 65 dB SPL.

Clinical performance, audiological outcomes, and quality of life of the Cochlear Osia ® system

ObjectiveThe Cochlear Osseointegrated Steady-State Implant Bone Anchored Hearing Device (Osia) is a surgically implanted titanium apparatus that utilizes a piezoelectric actuator under the skin to address conductive and mixed hearing loss as well as single-sided deafness. The purpose of this study is to examine the clinical, audiologic, and quality-of-life outcomes in patients who underwent Osia implantation. MethodsThis is a retrospective study analyzing 30 adult patients (age 27–86) with conductive healing loss (CHL), mixed hearing loss (MHL), or single-sided deafness (SSD) who were implanted with the Osia device from January 2020 to April 2023 at a single institution by the senior author. Preoperative speech score testing (CNC, AzBio in quiet, AzBio in noise) were performed in all subjects while unaided, wearing conventional air conduction hearing aids, and wearing a softband BAHA. These preoperative speech scores were then compared to post-implantation speech scores using paired t-test analysis to assess for degree of speech improvement. In order to analyze quality of life after Osia implantation, each patient filled out the Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI) survey. The GBI is a series of 18 questions answered using a five-point Likert scale that addresses the changes in general health status, physical health status, psychosocial health status, and social support after a medical intervention. ResultsCHL, MHL, and SSD patients had significant improvement in hearing and speech recognition scores after Osia implantation compared to preoperative unaided hearing: CNC (14 % vs 80 %, p < 0.0001), AzBio in Quiet (26 % vs 94 %, p < 0.0001), and AzBio in Noise (36 % vs 87 %, p = 0.0001). Preoperative speech scores using the softband BAHA were accurate predictors of post-implantation speech scores and can serve to determine surgical candidacy for the Osia. Post-implantation Glasgow Benefit Inventory patient surveys demonstrated significant improvement in quality of life with patients scoring an average increase of +54.1 points in heath satisfaction. ConclusionAdult patients with CHL, MHL, and SSD can receive significant improvement in speech recognition scores after implantation with the Osia device. This translates to improved quality of life, which was confirmed on the post-implantation Glasgow Benefit Inventory patient surveys.

Analysis of rehabilitation effects of cochlear implantation in elderly patients with prelingual deafness

Objective:The auditory and speech rehabilitation effects were assessed by the Categories of Auditory Performance（CAP） and the speech intelligibility rating scale（SIR） after cochlear implantation（CI） in prelingually elderly patients by telephone follow-up or face-to-face conversation. Methods:The clinical data of the prelingually deaf patients who underwent unilateral CI in the Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Shanxi People's Hospital, from December 2016 to December 2021 were collected. Thirty-eight patients were divided into Group A（SIR 1, 17 cases）, Group B（SIR 2, 10 cases） and Group C（SIR 3, 11 cases） according to the preoperative SIR Score. Nineteen patients with post-lingual hearing impairment were selected as the control group（Group D, 19 cases）. The effects of hearing and speech rehabilitation were evaluated using CAP and SIR Scores before surgery, 6 months after startup, and 1 year after startup. Results:There were no significant differences in CAP scores among the three groups of patients with prelingually deaf patients at 6 months and 1 year after startup（P>0.05）, but there were significant differences between group A and group D at 6 months and 1 year after startup（P<0.05）; the SIR Score of group A had statistical difference before surgery and 6 months after startup（P<0.05）, group B had statistical difference before surgery and 1 year after startup（P<0.05）, and group C and D had no statistical difference before surgery and 6 months and 1 year after startup, respectively（P>0.05）. Conclusion:For the prelingually deaf elderly patients, hearing will develop rapidly 6 months after startup, and the effect of postoperative auditory rehabilitation was positively correlated with the preoperative speech ability. In the aspect of speech, the prelingually dear elderly patients who have poor preoperative speech ability could benefit more from CI early after surgery. CI is not contraindicated in prelingually deaf elderly patients, even those with poor preoperative speech function.

Responsible Imputation of Missing Speech Perception Testing Data & Analysis of 4,739 Observations and Predictors of Performance.

To address outcome heterogeneity in cochlear implant (CI) research, we built imputation models using multiple imputation by chained equations (MICEs) and K-nearest neighbors (KNNs) to convert between four common open-set testing scenarios: Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant word (CNCw), Arizona Biomedical (AzBio) in quiet, AzBio +5, and AzBio +10. We then analyzed raw and imputed data sets to evaluate factors affecting CI outcome variability. Retrospective cohort study of a national CI database (HERMES) and a nonoverlapping single-institution CI database. Multi-institutional (32 CI centers). Adult CI recipients (n = 4,046 patients). Mean absolute error (MAE) between imputed and observed speech perception scores. Imputation models of preoperative speech perception measures demonstrate a MAE of less than 10% for feature triplets of CNCw/AzBio in quiet/AzBio +10 (MICE: MAE, 9.52%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 9.40-9.64; KNN: MAE, 8.93%; 95% CI, 8.83-9.03) and AzBio in quiet/AzBio +5/AzBio +10 (MICE: MAE, 8.85%; 95% CI, 8.68-9.02; KNN: MAE, 8.95%; 95% CI, 8.74-9.16) with one feature missing. Postoperative imputation can be safely performed with up to four of six features missing in a set of CNCw and AzBio in quiet at 3, 6, and 12 months postcochlear implantation using MICE (MAE, 9.69%; 95% CI, 9.63-9.76). For multivariable analysis of CI performance prediction, imputation increased sample size by 72%, from 2,756 to 4,739, with marginal change in adjusted R2 (0.13 raw, 0.14 imputed). Missing data across certain sets of common speech perception tests may be safely imputed, enabling multivariate analysis of one of the largest CI outcomes data sets to date.

Extended Preoperative Audiometry for Outcome Prediction and Risk Analysis in Patients Receiving Cochlear Implants.

The outcome of cochlear implantation has improved over the last decades, but there are still patients with less benefit. Despite numerous studies examining the cochlear implant (CI) outcome, variations in speech comprehension with CI remains incompletely explained. The aim of this study was therefore to examine preoperative pure-tone audiogram and speech comprehension as well as aetiology, to investigate their relationship with postoperative speech comprehension in CI recipients. A retrospective study with 664 ears of 530 adult patients was conducted. Correlations between the target variable postoperative word comprehension with the preoperative speech and sound comprehension as well as aetiology were investigated. Significant correlations were inserted into multivariate models. Speech comprehension measured as word recognition score at 70 dB with CI was analyzed as (i) a continuous and (ii) a dichotomous variable. All variables that tested preoperative hearing were significantly correlated with the dichotomous target; with the continuous target, all except word comprehension at 65 dB with hearing aid. The strongest correlation with postoperative speech comprehension was seen for monosyllabic words with hearing aid at 80 dB. The preoperative maximum word comprehension was reached or surpassed by 97.3% of CI patients. Meningitis and congenital diseases were strongly negatively associated with postoperative word comprehension. The multivariate model was able to explain 40% of postoperative variability. Speech comprehension with hearing aid at 80 dB can be used as a supplementary preoperative indicator of CI-aided speech comprehension and should be measured regularly in the clinical routine. Combining audiological and aetiological variables provides more insights into the variability of the CI outcome, allowing for better patient counselling.

Characteristics of the Summating Potential Measured Across a Cochlear Implant Array as an Indicator of Cochlear Function.

The underlying state of cochlear and neural tissue function is known to affect postoperative speech perception following cochlear implantation. The ability to assess these tissues in patients can be performed using intracochlear electrocochleography (IC ECochG). One component of ECochG is the summating potential (SP) that appears to be generated by multiple cochlear tissues. Its qualities may be able to detect the presence of functional inner hair cells, but evidence for this is limited in human cochleae. This study aimed to examine the IC SP characteristics in cochlear implantation recipients, its relationship to preoperative speech perception and audiometric thresholds, and to other IC ECochG components. This is a retrospective analysis of 113 patients' IC ECochG recordings across the array in response to a 500 Hz tone burst stimulus. Responses to condensation and rarefaction stimuli were then subtracted from one another to emphasize the cochlear microphonic and added to one another to emphasize the SP, auditory nerve neurophonic, and compound action potential. Patients were grouped based on their maximum SP deflection being large and positive (+SP), large and negative (-SP), or minimal (0 SP) to further investigate these relationships. Patients in the +SP group had better preoperative speech perception (mean consonant-vowel-consonant phoneme score 46%) compared to the -SP and 0 SP groups (consonant-vowel-consonant phoneme scores 34% and 36%, respectively, difference to +SP: p < 0.05). Audiometric thresholds were lowest for +SP (mean pure-tone average 50 dB HL), then -SP (65 dB HL), and highest for 0 SP patients (70 dB HL), but there was not a statistical significance between +SP and -SP groups (p > 0.1). There were also distinct differences between SP groups in the qualities of their other ECochG components. These included the +SP patients having larger cochlear microphonic maximum amplitude, more apical SP peak electrode locations, and a more spatially specific SP magnitude growth pattern across the array. Patients with large positive SP deflection in IC ECochG have preoperatively better speech perception and lower audiometric thresholds than those without. Patterns in other ECochG components suggest its positive deflection may be an indicator of cochlear function.

Sphincter Pharyngoplasty for Velopharyngeal Dysfunction: Impact of 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome.

Patients with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11DelS) often present with velopharyngeal dysfunction (VPD). VPD in patients with 22q11DelS is multifactorial beyond velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) alone, and differences in surgical outcomes are poorly understood. Our objective was to determine whether patients with 22q11DelS have an increased risk for persistent VPI after sphincter pharyngoplasty compared to patients without 22q11DelS. We completed a retrospective cohort study of patients with 22q11DelS undergoing sphincter pharyngoplasty between 1995 and 2019 using a VPD clinic database. Patients with 22q11DelS were compared to a cohort of 2:1 frequency-matched (age, degree of velopharyngeal closure) patients without 22q11DelS. Variables included patient characteristics, surgical history, perceptual speech evaluation, and degree of closure on nasopharyngoscopic evaluations. Primary outcomes included postoperative VPI severity and hypernasality. Speech and nasopharyngoscopic characteristics were compared using Fisher's exact test. Postoperative VPI severity and hypernasality were compared between groups via relative risks (RR) from mixed effects Poisson regression models, with random effects of age and velopharyngeal closure. 134 patients (51 22q11DelS, 83 matched) were included, with mean age of 7.3 years (standard deviation 3.0) and 50% male. Cohorts had similar preoperative speech characteristics and nasopharyngoscopic findings. Patients with 22q11DelS had similar postoperative VP function as patients without 22q11DelS (RR 0.85, CI 0.46-1.57 for VPI severity, RR 0.83, CI 0.45-1.53 for hypernasality). Even after adjusting by preoperative variables, no differences were seen between both groups. Matched for age and pre-operative velopharyngeal closure, patients with and without 22q11DelS and VPI had similar benefits after sphincter pharyngoplasty. Non-randomized controlled cohort study, 3 Laryngoscope, 133:2813-2820, 2023.

Association between lateral wall electrode array insertion parameters and audiological outcomes in bilateral cochlear implantation

PurposeThe aims of this study were to compare speech recognition at different postoperative times for both ears in bilaterally implanted patients and to assess the influence of the time of deafness, frequency-to-place mismatch, angular insertion depth (AID) and angular separation between neighbouring electrode contacts on audiometric outcomes.MethodsThis study was performed at an academic tertiary referral centre. A total of 19 adult patients (6 men, 13 women), who received sequential bilateral implantation with lateral wall electrode arrays, were analysed in retrospective. Statistical analysis was performed using two-sided t test, Wilcoxon test, median test, and Spearman’s correlation.ResultsPostlingually deafened patients (deafness after the age of 10) had a significantly better speech perception (WRS65[CI]) than the perilingually deafened subjects (deafness at the age of 1–10 years) (p < 0.001). Comparison of cochlear duct length between peri- and postlingually deafened subjects showed a slightly significantly smaller cochleae in perilingual patients (p = 0.045). No association between frequency-to-place mismatch as well as angular separation and speech perception could be detected. There was even no significant difference between the both ears in the intraindividual comparison, even if insertion parameters differed.ConclusionThe exact electrode position seems to have less influence on the speech comprehension of CI patients than already established parameters as preoperative speech recognition or duration of deafness.

Cochlear Implantation in Patients With Known Cognitive Impairment: What Are the Benefits?

To evaluate the outcomes of cochlear implantation (CI) in adults with preoperatively diagnosed cognitive impairment. Retrospective cohort study. Tertiary-care academic center. Adults undergoing CI with preexisting cognitive impairment. Cochlear implantation. 1) Hearing improvement after CI; 2) morbidity and mortality associated with surgery. Eight patients met inclusion criteria with mean age 77.8 years (SD, 9.6 y) at time of implantation; 7 were included in subsequent analysis as one did not have speech recognition scores. Average preoperative MoCA cognitive score of 22.6 (SD, 3.9, ≤25 demonstrates cognitive impairment). Average follow-up was 29.0 months (SD, 33.3 mo). Two patients passed away at an average 58.0 months (SD, 31.1 mo) after surgery. Median preoperative pure tone average was 86.3 dB HL ( interquartile range 31.3 dB HL) compared with 33.8 dB HL (IQR 5.0 dB HL) postoperatively ( p = <0.001). Median preoperative speech testing score (AzBio/HINT) was 21% (IQR, 24%) compared with 44% (IQR, 21%) postoperatively ( p = <0.001). There were no observed surgical complications during the follow-up period. This study demonstrates that patients with cognitive impairment before CI can experience improved hearing, no increased risk of complications, and good longevity after CI. Further prospective studies are needed to further define the utility of CI in patients with impaired cognition.

Criteria for early and late velopharyngoplasty in 61 children with cleft palate

BackgroundVelopharyngeal insufficiency persists in 15 to 30% of children with cleft palate, despite early velar surgery. Pharyngoplasty using a superior pedicle flap is the most common secondary surgery to treat velopharyngeal insufficiency. This study aims to identify the criteria leading to indicate velopharyngoplasty in 3 groups of age. Materials and methodswe conducted a retrospective single center study in the reference center for cleft palate in Paris from 2013 to 2016. We included 61 children with non-syndromic cleft operated on with a velopharyngoplasty for velopharyngeal insufficiency. Pre-operative speech and surgical assessments, as well as the operative reports of the children, were analyzed retrospectively using multivariate models. ResultsWe included 61 patients. The only criteria factor for an early velopharyngoplasty was the Pittsburgh Weighted Speech Scale (PWSS) score (OR 1.20, CI 95% 1.07 to 1.4 ; P=.006). Criteria for a late velopharyngoplasty were a degradation of the velopharyngeal function (OR 16.07, CI 95% 1.7 to 518.7 ; P=.041) and lost of follow-up (OR 5.78, CI 95% 3.9 to 4320 ; P=.017). ConclusionCriteria for early and late velopharyngoplasty were identified, and we demonstrated the insufficiency of Borel-Maisonny classification for scientific clinical study.

Алгоритм и методика количественной оценки схожести речевых сигналов

The paper proposes a method to solve the task of automated quantitative assessment of the syllable pronunciation. This quantitative assessment is used to evaluate the speech quality during speech rehabilitation. An algorithm for quantifying the similarity of two audio signals of different lengths is presented. The algorithm uses a hybrid match measure. The hybrid measure is based on calculation of three metrics (DTWdistance, correlation coefficient and Minkowski metric) and using a fuzzy classifier as a mechanism for combining the calculated values. The average number of coincidences of estimates by the proposed algorithm and estimates by the previously applied method is 83%. A method for quantifying the similarity of speech signals using several reference signals is proposed. The method allows to consider the variability of speech and the individual characteristics of the phoneme’s pronunciation. This is achieved by using records of the patient's preoperative speech as reference signals.