Preoperative Prostate Volume Research Articles

Increased oscillation rate may improve morcellation efficiency in HoLEP

Introduction: Tissue morcellation has become increasingly efficient, yet remains a rate limiting step in holmium enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP). Limited data exists on how the rate of oscillation by the morcellator blades affects morcellation efficiency (ME). Methods: We undertook a retrospective review of HoLEP procedures performed by two surgeons from July 1, 2019 to August 25, 2022. All morcellation was performed with the Wolf Piranha device and enucleation was performed with Moses 2.0 technology. Surgeon 1 routinely uses 1500 oscillations/min (low rate [LR]) and Surgeon 2 uses a rate of 6000 oscillations/min (high rate [HR]). These rates were confirmed upon EMR review of each case. The primary endpoint was ME (g/minute). Secondary endpoints included enucleation efficiency (EE), mean tissue specimen weight, and preoperative prostate volume. Results: A total of 894 HoLEPs were analyzed, 592 by Surgeon 1 and 302 by Surgeon 2. Surgeon 1 had larger preoperative prostate volumes (126 vs. 101, p<0.001) and specimen tissue weights (86.0 vs, 61.1, p<0.001). EE was higher in the LR group (1.67 vs. 1.33 g/min, p<0.001). Morcellation time was longer in the LR group (11.3 vs. 6.09 min, p<0.001) and ME was lower in the LR group (9.26 vs. 12.1 g/min, p<0.001). The difference in ME was inversely proportional to specimen weight. Conclusions: Increased oscillation rate during morcellation may lead to decrease in morcellation time and increased ME during prostate enucleation. The primary limitation of this paper is the inclusion of only two surgeons. Future studies will serve to evaluate this finding across a larger number of institutions, and evaluate ways to increase ME in large prostate cohorts.

Does size matter? A single institution's comparison of Aquablation in prostates greater than or less than 150 mL.

Surgical management options for lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hypertension have remained limited in prostates of large volume. The advent of the Aquablation has created a potential minimally invasive option for treatment in prostates of all volumes. Thus, this study aims to evaluate outcomes and complications of Aquablation in clinical practice based on prostate volume. Collected variables included adverse events with Clavien-Dindo classifications, transfusion rates, surgical retreatment rates, continued medication use postoperatively, and International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) with Quality-of-Life indicator. Aquablations were stratified by preoperative prostate volume. One hundred seventy-four men were included in the study. The average postop decrease in IPSS was 10.28, with a 2.02 point decrease in Quality-of-Life at 1 year. Postop increase in peak urinary flow rate was 7.65 mL/s for an average of 16.44 mL/s. Hemoglobin drop average was 1.78 g/dL, but only 2.3% of patients required a transfusion. 12.9% of patients required surgical retreatment. Six months after Aquablation, 22.9% and 12.9% of patients continued taking Alpha-blockers and Androgen receptor inhibitors, respectively. Adverse events occurred in 33 patients (19.0%). Eighteen patients were excluded from secondary analysis due to unrecorded prostate volume, leaving 123 with volumes <150 mL and 33 with volumes ≥150 mL. Groups were comparable with respect to length of stay, adverse events, blood transfusion, IPSS with Quality-of-Life indicator preoperative and postoperative, postop peak urinary flow, and postop alpha-blocker use. Larger prostates had a higher rate of adverse events, retreatment, postop hemoglobin drop, and postop use of finasteride. Aquablation is a viable treatment option for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Efficacy, safety, subjective outcomes, and adverse event rates were not impacted by prostate volume. However, size does matter as prostates ≥150 mL had higher surgical retreatment rates and postop finasteride use.

Does concordance between preoperatively measured prostate volume and enucleated weight predict outcomes in endoscopic enucleation of the prostate? Results from the REAP database.

We aimed to determine if preoperative prostate volume-enucleated weight concordance predicts short-term anatomical endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (AEEP) outcomes using the REAP international database. 649 patients with data on both preoperative ultrasound-derived prostate volume and enucleated specimen weight were analyzed. Linear regression was used to investigate the effect of volume-weight concordance on postoperative outcomes. Model residuals were used to divide the cohort into 3 centiles: (1) less-than-expected enucleated specimen weight; (2) appropriate concordance between prostate volume and specimen weight; (3) more-than-expected specimen weight. Outcomes were also analyzed with only enucleated weight as a predictor (comparing ≤ 80g and > 80g). There was a trend towards more-than-expected enucleated specimen weight with increased age (p = 0.006). There was an increasing trend of operation time (p = 0.012) and enucleation time (p = 0.015) as specimen weight increased, and a decreasing trend of postoperative acute urinary retention (p = 0.005). Laser type, enucleation method, and early apical release were similar. In correlation analysis, greater-than-expected prostate weight was associated with greater Qmax improvement at 3 months. Prostate weight alone did not appear to be a significant predictor of outcomes. If enucleated specimen weight is more than expected according to preoperative ultrasound volume measurement, greater Qmax improvement and less postoperative acute urinary retention is expected. Although precision may be limited by ultrasound approximation and inexact specimen weight measurements, these shortcomings are similar in real-world clinical practice. Overall, preoperative prostate volume and actual enucleated specimen weight should be interpreted in the context of each other to predict clinical outcomes.

Real-world experience with the new pulsed solid-state Thulium: YAG laser (Thulio) for endoscopic enucleation of the prostate

PurposeThe solid-state Thulium laser (Tm: YAG) is a novel alternative to the widely used Holmium laser for endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (EEP) due to its relatively high peak power. The aim of this study was to examine the efficacy and safety of a new pulsed Tm: YAG laser in its first application in humans.MethodsData were retrospectively collected for the first 103 patients who underwent EEP with a new pulsed solid-state Tm: YAG laser (Thulio®, Dornier MedTech Systems GmbH, Weßling, Germany). Peri- and postoperative data were assessed. Procedure-specific complications were graded using Clavien-Dindo Classifications (CDC). Patients were interviewed 15 months after the surgery to evaluate functional and long-term outcomes. Statistical analysis was performed with Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS®).ResultsThe mean preoperative prostate volume was 105.6 ± 55.0 ml. Median enucleation speed was 4.1 g per minute (range 1.1–9.7). Short-term postoperative complications occurred in 21 patients (20.4%), but no high-grade complications (CDC ≥ IV) were observed. Five patients suffered gross haematuria and required reintervention (CDC IIIb; 4.9%). After 15 months, 76 patients (73.8%) participated in the follow-up interview, where seven patients (9.2%) reported complications, including two reinterventions for urethral strictures (CDC IIIb; 2.6%). Most patients reported an improvement in continence (54.0%) and urine stream (93.4%), but no difference in erectile function (81.6%). No persistent dysuria was reported. Patient satisfaction with the surgery results was very high (96.1%).ConclusionEndoscopic enucleation of the prostate with the new pulsed solid-state Tm: YAG laser is a safe and effective option for surgical BPH treatment.Trial registrationGerman Clinical Trials Register number: DRKS00031676. Registration date: 10 May 2023, retrospectively registered.

Delayed hematuria after prostatic photovaporization: risk factors to know.

characterize delayed hematuria (DH) after photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) and identify its associated risk factors. 1014 patients who underwent PVP at an expert center, from September 2005 through December 2021, were prospectively enrolled in a database registry. Risk factors of DH included age, prostate volume, ASA score, history of BPH surgery, history of prostate cancer, use of anticoagulation or 5ARIs, concomitant procedure, operative factors, and the duration of follow-up. The median operating time was 60 ± 11 min. The median specific applied energy was 318,500 Joules ± 101,347. After PVP, the mean catheterization duration was 1.6 days with a postoperative hospitalization time of 1.8 days. The median follow-up was 52 months (range 2-95months). Hematuria occurred in 206 patients (20.3%), with 10% requiring an ER visit and 8.3% requiring hospital admission, transfusion or endoscopic clot removal. Almost 80% of hematuria episodes occurred within the first 3months. The overall retreatment rate for clot retention was 3.7% after a mean time of 50months. Hematuria-free survival was 97.2% after 1year, and 89.3% after 4years. Delayed hematuria occurred in 32 patients (3.1%). In the multivariate analysis, age, preoperative prostate volume, anticoagulant use, total applied energy, lasing time and operative time were identified as risk factors for delayed hematuria after PVP. Larger prostate volume, longer operative time, longer lasing time, and use of oral anticoagulation increase the odds of delayed hematuria after PVP, while older age is protective.

Transurethral water vapour thermal therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia under local anaesthesia alone: initial experience in Chinese patients.

This study evaluated the perioperative and early postoperative outcomes of transurethral water vapour thermal therapy (WVTT) under local anaesthesia alone for benign prostatic enlargement in Chinese patients. This retrospective review of transurethral WVTT for benign prostatic enlargement focused on 50 Chinese patients who exhibited clinical indications (acute retention of urine or symptomatic lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic enlargement) for surgical treatment between June 2020 and December 2021 in Hong Kong. Exclusion criteria included active urinary tract problems and urological malignancies. Follow-up was conducted at 3 months postoperatively. The median patient age was 71.5 years. The mean preoperative prostatic volume was 56.7 mL. The mean operation time was 25.1 minutes. All procedures were performed under local anaesthesia alone. The mean pain scores for transrectal ultrasound probe insertion, transperineal local anaesthesia injection, and transurethral WVTT were 2, 5, and 4, respectively. Forty-nine patients (98%) were discharged on the same day with a urethral catheter. Forty-eight patients (96%) successfully completed a trial without catheter within 3 weeks postoperatively. Five patients (10%) had unplanned hospital admission within 30 days postoperatively due to surgical complications (Clavien-Dindo grade 1). Transurethral WVTT, an advanced surgical treatment for benign prostatic enlargement, is a safe procedure that relieves lower urinary tract symptoms with minimal hospital stay. It can be performed in an office-based setting under local anaesthesia, maximising utilisation of the surgical theatre.

Evaluation of the learning curve for Thulium laser enucleation of the prostate in a contemporary cohort.

To assess the learning curve of Thulium laser enucleation of the prostate (ThuLEP) of a single surgeon. Hundred patients suffering from benign prostatic hyperplasia were treated by the same surgeon. In all cases, a well-trained urologist was present in the operating room. Patients urinary function was assessed preoperatively using the International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS), maximum flow rate and Post-Void Residual volume. Preoperative prostate volume was recorded. Enucleation and morcellation efficiency and complication rate were evaluated. Patients were divided into 5 cohorts of 20 consecutive cases to assess changes in outcomes through time. Mean age of patients was 73.1years (SD 17.5) and mean prostate volume was 89.7ml (SD 55.1). Overall, mean enucleation and morcellation efficiency were 1.7 (SD 2.9) and 5.1 (SD 2.7) g/min. A statistically significant increase in enucleation efficiency was observed when comparing cohort 1 vs 2 (0.9 vs 1.3g/min, p = 0.03) and cohort 2 vs 3 (1.3 vs 1.7g/min, p = 0.02). A statistically significant increase in morcellation efficiency was observed when comparing cohort 1 vs 2 (2.8 vs 3.7g/min, p = 0.02) and cohort 2 vs 3 (3.7 vs 4.9g/min, p = 0.03). In both cases, no significant differences were observed when comparing the following cohorts. Complication rate showed no significant differences throughout the caseload. In our single-surgeon experience, we observed a learning curve of nearly 60 cases for the ThuLEP procedure in presence of a well-trained surgeon. Complication rate was low from the beginning of surgical experience.

Correlations Between Preoperative Indicators and Postoperative Histopathological Outcomes in Prostate Cancer Patients

Objective: Prostate cancer continues to pose a significant health challenge, with diverse prognoses influenced by preoperative and postoperative assessments. This study aims to elucidate the correlation between preoperative clinical indicators and postoperative histopathological outcomes to enhance prognostic models. The primary objective of this study is to investigate the predictive value of preoperative factors, such as age, Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) level, prostate volume (PV), and tumor volume (TV), on postoperative outcomes, specifically focusing on extracapsular invasion (ECI), seminal vesicle invasion (SVI), and positive surgical margins (PSM). Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the data of 63 patients with prostate cancer who underwent radical prostatectomy. Preoperative clinical data, including age, PSA level, PV, and TV, were collected. Postoperative histopathological data were gathered for ECI, SVI, and PSM. Statistical analyses, including correlation coefficients and median comparisons, were employed to identify significant predictors of postoperative outcomes. Results: The cohort had a mean age of 64.1 years, with PSA levels ranging from 3.65 to 112 ng/ml. Patients with ECI had a median PSA of 14.9 ng/ml, whereas those without had 8.2 ng/ml (p=0.001). Median PV and TV were significantly higher in patients with ECI (PV: 55 cc, TV: 8.07 cc) than in those without ECI (PV: 49 cc, TV: 4.25 cc, p=0.001). Similar significant differences were noted for SVI and PSM, with higher PSA, PV, and TV values in patients with these features (p≤0.042). Age did not significantly affect the outcomes. Conclusion: Preoperative PSA level, prostate volume, and tumor volume were significant predictors of adverse postoperative histopathological features in patients with prostate cancer. These findings highlight the need for a multifactorial approach in preoperative evaluation and advocate the development of enhanced predictive models for improved clinical decision-making and patient management.

Preoperative Frailty Scores Predict the Early Postoperative Complications of Holmium Laser Enucleation of Prostate.

Background: Frailty is a recent multidimensional concept of a contemporary growing interest for understanding the complex health status of elderly population. We aimed to assess the impact of frailty scores on the outcome and complication rate of holmium laser enucleation of prostate (HoLEP). Methods: A 7-year data of HoLEP patients in a single tertiary referral center were reviewed. The preoperative, operative, early, and late postoperative outcome data were collected and compared according to the preoperative frailty scores. Frailty was assessed preoperatively using the Modified Hopkins frailty score. Results: The study included 837 patients categorized into two groups: group I included 533 nonfrail patients (frailty score = 0), whereas group II included 304 frail patients (frailty score ≥1). The median (interquartile range) age was 70 (11) and 75 (11) years for groups I and II, respectively (<0.001). The 30-day perioperative complication rate (p = 0.005), blood transfusion (p = 0.013), failed voiding trial (p = 0.0015), and 30-day postoperative readmission (p = 0.0363) rates were significantly higher in frail patients of group II. The two groups were statistically comparable regarding postoperative international prostate symptom score (p = 0.6886, 0.6308, 0.9781), incontinence rate (p = 0.475, 0.592, 0.1546), postvoid residual (p = 0.5801, 0.1819, 0.593) at 6 weeks and 3 months, and 1-year follow-up intervals, respectively. Conclusion: In elderly patients undergoing HoLEP, the preoperative frailty scores strongly correlate with the risk of perioperative complications. Frail patients should be counseled regarding their relative higher risk of early perioperative complications although they gain the same functional profit of HoLEP as nonfrail patients.

A Phase I/II Dose-Escalation Study Evaluating the Safety of 21 Gy, 23 Gy, and 25 Gy for High Dose Rate (HDR) Prostate Brachytherapy: An Interim Toxicity Report.

Single-fraction high dose rate (HDR) prostate brachytherapy has shown improved actuarial biochemical control rates from 66% to 82% with dose escalation from 19 to 20.5 Gy, respectively, but is still inferior to the reported low dose rate brachytherapy control rates of over 90%. We aimed to identify whether dose escalation to 21, 23, and 25 Gy can be safely accomplished. Patients with previously untreated, pathologically confirmed, low-risk (cT1-T2a, Gleason ≤6, PSA <10 ng/mL) or favorable intermediate risk (Gleason 3+4, percentage of positive biopsy cores <50%, ≤1 NCCN intermediate risk factor) prostate adenocarcinoma were enrolled from a single institution. PSA and toxicity assessment were performed at baseline and at routine 6-month follow-ups. From May 9, 2018 to May 12, 2022, 18 patients were enrolled. None had received prior androgen deprivation therapy, 44% had low risk disease, and 61% were ECOG 0 at baseline. Median age was 68 years (total range: 43-79), and 83% were Caucasian. Eight patients received 21 Gy, nine patients received 23 Gy, and one patient received 25 Gy, with the 25 Gy cohort still accruing. The mean prostate size and range, determined by pre-operative prostate volume study on trans-rectal ultrasound, were as follows: 21Gy cohort (mean: 41.2cc; range: 21.9-63.1cc), 23Gy Cohort (mean: 41.2cc, range 28.3-71.7cc), 25Gy cohort (65.3cc). A median of 17 catheters (range: 16-20) were implanted. At a median follow-up of 35.7 months (range: IQR 4.4 - 50.2), only one grade 3 toxicity was reported, which was an ulcerative colitis (UC) flare noted in a patient whose UC was poorly controlled, requiring multiple courses of prednisone in the 6 months prior to his brachytherapy. Regarding toxicities attributable to therapy, fourteen and four patients experienced a grade 1 and 2 genitourinary toxicity respectively; four and four patients experienced a grade 1 and 2 reproductive system toxicity respectively; one patient experienced a grade 1 GI toxicity. Two patients needed foley catheters upon discharge, with neither requiring the foley long term. There were two treatment failures in the 21Gy cohort at 1.39 and 1.67 years from date of HDR brachytherapy; date of failure was defined by the first PSA 2.0ng/mL over nadir. Of these patients, one underwent focal salvage HDR, whilst the other underwent radical prostatectomy with only 1% of the volume involved by prostate cancer. Of note, there was seminal vesicle involvement on restaging prostate biopsy for the patient that underwent radical prostatectomy, however, this was not appreciated on the final prostatectomy specimen. Both patients have no evidence of disease currently. HDR brachytherapy appears well tolerated in patients with low to favorable intermediate risk prostate cancer at 21 and 23 Gy, with more accrual needed at 25Gy. Long-term follow-up needed to assess efficacy.

Open prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia: A critical analysis of patient presentation and surgical outcomes in a contemporary series.

Open prostatectomy (OP) is still a valid treatment option for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), but it needs to be constantly reevaluated in the context of minimally invasive treatments (MITs). Our purpose is to present contemporary data on patient presentation and surgical outcomes of OP with which other OP series and MITs can be compared. A retrospective study of all OP was carried out in our institution from January 2011 to December 2020. All patients had a thorough preoperative workup and optimization of comorbidities before surgery. Data were collected in a predesigned pro forma and analyzed. The mean age of the 148 patients studied was 66.2 (±7.9) yrs. The mean duration of symptoms before surgery was 32.2 (±33.7) mos. The mean preoperative prostate volume was 118.0 (±67.1) cm3. There was a 54.4% comorbidity rate with diabetes mellitus (DM) topping the list (16.0%). An incidental prostate cancer rate of 6.1% was found. The overall complication rate was 45.3%. Perioperative hemorrhage requiring blood transfusion (BT) was the most common complication (26.1%). There was no significant difference in age, duration of surgery, and prostrate volume between subjects with and without BT (P > 0.05). Wound infection was significantly associated with diabetes (P = 0.043, OR = 3.507, 95% CI = 1.042-11.805). The reoperation rate was 1.4%, and mortality rate was 0.7%. The International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality-of-life (QOL) score, and post-void residual urine (PVR) volume were significantly improved (P < 0.001). OP was found to be a safe and effective procedure for the relief of bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) secondary to BPH. However, it was associated with high morbidity and low reoperation rate.

Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate vs Transvesical Single-port Robotic Simple Prostatectomy for Large Prostatic Glands

To compare the perioperative outcomes of transvesical single-port robotic simple prostatectomy (SP-RASP) and holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP). A retrospective review was performed of patients undergoing SP-RASP and HoLEP from 2019 to 2022 with preoperative prostatic volume (PPV) >80cm3. Percent of prostate adenoma removed (%PAR) was estimated by specimen weight normalized by PPV. Univariate analysis was performed using chi-square, Fisher exact, and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. A subgroup analysis with 1:1 matching for PPV was also performed. A total of 50 SP-RASP and 90 HoLEP cases were analyzed. The median (interquartile range) PPV was 169 (128-244)cm3 for SP-RASP and 129 (100-150)cm3 for HoLEP, (P<.01). The median (interquartile range) %PAR was 57(44-68) for SP-RASP vs 51(42-62) for HoLEP (P=.10). Overall, 11(12%) HoLEP and 5(10%) SP-RASP patients experienced complications (P=.51). Same-day discharge occurred in 24(48%) SP-RASP vs 7(8%) HoLEP patients (P<.01). Median foley catheter duration was longer in SP-RASP (6 vs 1day, P<.01) and trial of void was successful at first attempt in >94% (P=.68). Transient de novo incontinence was reported in 24(28%) HoLEP vs 2(5%) SP-RASP (P<.01). No differences in voiding parameters were observed at latest follow up. Subgroup postmatched analysis revealed analogous findings. SP-RASP and HoLEP have similar favorable perioperative outcomes for management of large prostatic adenomas. SP-RASP may be considered in patients unwilling to accept the risk of transient incontinence and in those with unfavorable urethral access, large bladder stone burden, or diverticula.

The effect of acute urinary retention on the results of transurethral resection of the prostate.

Acute urinary retention (AUR) is one of the most severe symptoms of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH). There are some studies in the literature describing the risk factors for the development of AUR in BPH patients. However, the studies that summarize the effect of AUR on Transurethral resection of Prostate (TUR-P) surgery results are limited. The aim of this study is to assess the effect of AUR on TUR-P results. Between 2018 and 2020, patients who underwent TUR-P for AUR or lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) were included in the study. The inclusion criteria were, men over 50 years old with a BPH diagnosis and who underwent monopolar TUR-P by a single surgeon. The exclusion criteria were; patients who had prostate cancer, multiple sclerosis, or neurogenic bladder were diagnosed or had previous lower urinary tract surgeries such as TUR-P, TUR-Bladder, Urethrotomy, had a chronic indwelling catheter, and patients who did not accept immediate TUR-P and preferred trial without catheter (TWOC) protocol. The age, PSA, prostate volume, pre- and post-operative flow rates, duration of hospitalization, and complications were recorded. Two groups were constituted for comparison such as AUR and Elective Group and p values <0.05 were considered significant. There were 14 and 46 patients for AUR and Elective Groups respectively. The age, pre-operative prostate volume, free and total PSA values, postoperative complication rate, and re-hospitalization rate were significantly higher in the AUR-Group. However, there were no differences between groups in terms of pre-operative medication, duration of hospitalization, and post-operative uroflow maximum flow rate. Patients who underwent TUR-P after AUR have a higher risk for complications and re-hospitalization. Care should be taken in these patients and patients should be warned about the risks.

Correlation between body mass index and prostate volume in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia

Introduction. Obstruction due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a common condition in men over 40 years of age. This study determined the association between body mass index (BMI) and preoperative prostate volume (PV).The purpose of the study was to determine whether there is an association between obesity and prostate volume in men with BPH.Materials and methods. The medical records of 96 patients who underwent holmium enucleation of the prostate as a treatment for BPH and who met the inclusion criteria were retrospectively reviewed. The mean age of the patients was (70.6±8.5) years. Correlation analysis was performed to assess the relationship between BMI and prostatic volume.Results. A total of 96 patient charts were analyzed. When assessing the relationship between BMI and prostate volume, a statistically significant direct correlation of moderate strength was found (ρ = 0.456, p &lt; 0.001). Patients with prostate volume &gt; 75 mL were significantly more likely to have urinary retention (p &lt; 0.001; OR = 4.7; 95% CI: 1.9−11.4).Discussion Studies on larger patient samples are needed to verify the results against true population figures.Conclusion A positive correlation between BMI and prostate volume has been established.

Incidence and predictors of urinary incontinence rates post-holmium laser enucleation of prostate.

One of the main adverse outcomes following Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) is the development of transient de novo urinary incontinence (UI). We aimed to evaluate the correlation of multiple risk factors to UI rates post-HoLEP. A review of prospectively maintained 7 year database for HoLEP patients in a single center was performed. UI data at 6 week, 3 month, and 1 year follow-up intervals were assessed with bivariate and multivariate analysis of multiple potential risk factors. The study included 666 patients with median (IQR) age of 72 (66-78) years old and median (IQR) preoperative prostate volume of 89 (68-126) gm. UI was seen in 287 (43%), 100 (15%) and 26 (5.8%) at 6 week, 3 month, and 1 year follow up occasions respectively. At 6 weeks follow up, UI type was stress, urge and mixed in 121 (18.16%), 118 (17.72) and 48 (7.21%) patients respectively. Using a multivariate regression analysis, obesity and pre-operative UI were associated with postoperative UI rate at both 6 week (p = .0065, .031) and 3 month (p = .0261, .044) follow up encounters respectively. Also, larger specimen weight was another predictor for 6 week UI (p = .0399) while higher frailty score was a predictor for UI at 3 month occasion (p = .041). Patients with preoperative UI, obesity, frailty, and large prostate volume are at higher risk of short-term UI post-HoLEP up to 3 months. Patients with one or more of these risk factors should be counseled regarding the higher risk of UI.

The Impact of Prostate Volume in Open Radical Prostatectomy: A Single Centre Experience

BackgroundEven the most experienced surgeons experience technical difficulties and challenges when operating on very large prostates, regardless of surgical technique. Our goal was to determine whether preoperative prostate volume has an impact on functional and oncological outcomes after open radical prostatectomy. Materials and MethodsWe reviewed the records of 909 patients who underwent open radical prostatectomy by a single surgeon at our institution. Variables were compared across quartile distributions of prostate volume as defined by preoperative transrectal ultrasound examination, including group A with prostate volume < 30ccm 3, group B with prostate volume ≥ 30ccm 3 and < 50ccm 3, group C with prostate volume ≥ 50ccm 3 and < 70ccm 3 and group D with prostate volume ≥ 70ccm3. Factors assessed in this analysis were patient age, preoperative prostate specific antigen (p-PSA), Gleason score, pathological stage, margin status, operative time, cystography leakage, early continence, biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free, and overall-survival (OS). The complication rates were classified using Clavien Dindo classification. ResultsThere were no statistically relevant differences between the groups considering preoperative factors such as age, p-PSA, Gleason score, and tumor stadium. Patients with a very large prostate had slightly higher percentage of anastomosis leakage, severe Clavien Dindo complication rates (≥ 3), longer operation time and severe early incontinence (IV°) rates, simultaneously having lower positive margin rates. Nevertheless, the early continence rates, BCR-free and OS were similar regardless of the prostate size. Conclusionsopen radical prostatectomy for patients with very large prostate is a viable therapy option with slightly higher urinary leakage-, early incontinence- and complication-rates that takes slightly more operation time. However, the functional and oncological outcomes are similar when compared to smaller prostates.

"Double Grooves-Double Rings" technique of transurethral Thulium laser enucleation of the prostate: learning curve of single surgeon

Objective: To evaluate the learning curve of the "Double Grooves-Double Rings" (DGDR) technique of transurethral Thulium laser enucleation of the prostate (ThuLEP) for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) by a single surgeon. From June 2021 to July 2022, 84 patients mean age (69.0±8.0) years,preoperative prostate volume (90.9±40.3)ml with BPH underwent ThuLEP in the Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital.Performed by a single surgeon who had no experience of transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) and any laser surgeries. The case scatter plots with the best fitting line were drawn to analyze the learning curve. According to the date of the surgeries, the patients were equally divided into three learning stages (28 patients for each group). The T-PSA,prostate volume,operative time,enucleation time, enucleation efficiency,catheter indwelling time, hemoglobin drop and perioperative complications (including re-TURP, blood transfusion, stress incontinence≥3 months and urethral stricture) were compared among the groups. The learning curve was divided into three stages, and the cutting point was shown on the 14th case. Except the prostate volume [stage1 (75.7±30.7) ml, stage2 (93.40±39.6)ml, stage3 (103.5±46.2) ml, P<0.05], there was no significant difference of the baseline data between three groups (P>0.05). Compared with those of stage 1(100.6±24.7) min,(0.55±0.22) g/min, a statistically significant improvement was observed in both of the operative time and the enucleation efficiency among stage 2[(84.5±36.6) min, (0.87±0.33) g/min and stage 3 (71.2±26.3) min, (1.27±0.45) g/min, P<0.05]. The learning curve of the DGDR technique for ThuLEP can be divided into three stages. A ThuLEP beginner can preliminarily master this technique after completing 14 cases.

Pulsed-wave vs Continuous-wave Thulium Fiber Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (ThuFLEP): A Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes

To compare intra and early postoperative outcomes between pulsed-wave and continuous-wave Thulium Fiber Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (PW-ThuFLEP vs CW-ThuFLEP) for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. 238 patients with lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia underwent PW-ThuFLEP (118 patients) vs CW-ThuFLEP (120 patients). Preoperative prostate volume, adenoma volume, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and hemoglobin values were recorded. International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), maximum flow rate (Qmax), post-void residual volume, and International Index of Erectile Function-5 score (IIEF-5) were assessed. Operative time, enucleation time, enucleation efficiency, catheterization time, irrigation volume, hospital stay, hemoglobin drop, and postoperative complications were recorded. Micturition improvements and sexual outcomes were evaluated 3months after surgery. CW-ThuFLEP showed shorter operative time (61.5 vs 67.4minutes, P=.04). Enucleation time (50.2 vs 53.3minutes, P=.12), enucleation efficiency (0.8 vs 0.7g/min, P=.38), catheterization time (2.2 vs 2.1days, P=.29), irrigation volume (32.9 vs 32.8L, P=.71), hospital stay (2.8 vs 2.6days, P=.29) and hemoglobin drop (0.38 vs 0.39g/dL, P=.53) were comparable. No significant difference in complication rate was observed. At 3-month follow-up, the procedures did not show any significant difference in IPSS, Qmax, post-void residual volume, IIEF-5, and PSA value. PW-ThuFLEP and CW-ThuFLEP both relieve lower urinary tract symptoms equally, with high efficacy and safety. Operative time was significantly shorter with CW-ThuFLEP, but with a small difference with low clinical impact. Enucleation time, enucleation efficiency, catheterization time, irrigation volume, hospital stay, hemoglobin and PSA drop, complication rate, and sexual outcomes showed no differences.

Sphincter First HoLEP: A New Technique to Improve Continence

Introduction: Transurethral enucleation of the prostate has proven to be a safe, effective, and durable technique in treating benign prostatic hyperplasia. Despite this, rates of postoperative stress urinary incontinence (SUI) are still an issue. We have been using en bloc enucleation for the past 4 years and, after mastering this technique, we developed an enucleation technique that, upon initially releasing the external sphincter, avoids the lesion caused by stretching and keeps the sphincteric mucosa intact. Our objective is to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and effect in SUI of a new surgical technique: sphincter first HoLEP (sf-HoLEP). Materials and Methods: sf-HoLEP was performed in 50 subjects by a single surgeon. Demographic and clinical data were collected. The annexed video shows the enucleation technique in detail. Results: Mean age was 72.8 years. Preoperative mean international prostatic symptoms score (IPSS) was 23.3. Preoperative mean peak flow and postvoid volume were 8.4 mL/s and 129.8 mL, respectively. Preoperative mean prostatic specific antigen was 6.1 ng/mL. Mean preoperative prostate volume was 95.8 cc (range 40–170 cc). sf-HoLEP was performed in the 50 subjects. The mean resected tissue was 68.8 g. No major complications were reported. Immediate continence was achieved in 48% of patients. At 1 and 6 months, the rate of reported stress incontinence was 4% and 2%. Compared with preoperative, IPSS scores, quality of life score, peak flow, and postvoid volume showed significative improvement at 6 months. Conclusion: sf-HoLEP is an innovative, feasible, and safe technique. sf-HoLEP seems to improve continence rates. Patient Consent Statement: Authors have received and archived patient consent for video recording/publication in advance of video recording of procedure. We declare that all authors have no conflicts of interest. Runtime of video: 9 mins 00 secs

Risk factors for bladder neck contracture after transurethral resection of the prostate.

Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is the most frequently used treatment of benign prostate hyperplasia with a prostate volume of <80 mL. A long-term complication is bladder neck contracture (BNC). The aim of the present study was to identify the risk factors for BNC formation after TURP. We conducted a retrospective analysis of all TURP primary procedures which were performed at one academic institution between 2013 and 2018. All patients were analyzed and compared with regard to postoperative formation of a BNC requiring further therapy. Uni- and multivariable logistic regression analyses (MVAs) were performed to identify possible risk factors for BNC development. We included 1368 patients in this analysis. Out of these, 88 patients (6.4%) developed BNC requiring further surgical therapy. The following factors showed a statistically significant association with BNC development: smaller preoperative prostate volume (p = 0.001), lower resected prostate weight (p = 0.004), lower preoperative levels of prostate-specific antigen (PSA, p < 0.001), shorter duration of the surgery (p = 0.027), secondary transurethral intervention (due to urinary retention or gross hematuria) during inpatient stay (p = 0.018), positive (≥100 CFU/mL) preoperative urine culture (p = 0.010), and urethral stricture (US) formation requiring direct visual internal urethrotomy (DVIU) postoperatively after TURP (p < 0.001), in particular membranous (p = 0.046) and bulbar (p < 0.001) strictures. Preoperative antibiotic treatment showed a protective effect (p = 0.042). Histopathological findings of prostate cancer (PCA) in the resected prostate tissue were more frequent among patients who did not develop BNC (p = 0.049). On MVA, smaller preoperative prostate volume (p = 0.046), positive preoperative urine culture (p = 0.021), and US requiring DVIU after TURP (p < 0.001) were identified as independent predictors for BNC development. BNC is a relevant long-term complication after TURP. In particular, patients with a smaller prostate should be thoroughly informed about this complication.