Preoperative Pancreatitis Research Articles

Long-term quality of life is better after laparoscopic compared to open pancreatoduodenectomy.

Three randomized controlled trials have reported improved functional recovery after Laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy (LPD), as compared to open pancreatoduodenectomy (OPD). Long-term results regarding quality of life (QoL) are lacking. The aim of this study was to compare long-term QoL of LPD versus OPD. A monocentric retrospective cross-sectional study was performed among patients < 75years old who underwent LPD or OPD for a benign or premalignant pathology in a high-volume center (2011-2021). An electronic three-part questionnaire was sent to eligible patients, including two diseases specific QoL questionnaires (the European Organization for Research and Treatment in Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for cancer (QLQ-C30) and a pancreatic cancer module (PAN26) and a body image questionnaire. Patient demographics and postoperative data were collected and compared between LPD and OPD. Among 948 patients who underwent PD (137 LPD, 811 OPD), 170 were eligible and 111 responded (58 LPD and 53 OPD). LPD versus OPD showed no difference in mean age (51 vs. 55years, p = 0.199) and female gender (40% vs. 45%, p = 0.631), but LPD showed lower BMI (24 vs 26; p = 0.028) and higher preoperative pancreatitis (29% vs 13%; p = 0.041). The postoperative outcome showed similar Clavien-Dindo ≥ III morbidity (19% vs. 23%; p = 0.343) and length of stay (24 vs. 21days, p = 0.963). After a similarmedian follow-up (3 vs. 3years; p = 0.122), LPD vs OPD patients reported higher QoL (QLQ-C30: 49.6 vs 56.3; p = 0.07), better pancreas specific health status score (PAN20: 50.5 vs 55.5; p = 0.002), physical functioning (p = 0.002), and activities limitations (p = 0.02). Scar scores were better after LPD regarding esthetics (p = 0.001), satisfaction (p = 0.04), chronic pain at rest (p = 0.036), moving (p = 0.011) or in daily activities (p = 0.02). There was no difference in digestive symptoms (p = 0.995). This monocentric study found improved long-term QoL in patients undergoing LPD, as compared to OPD, for benign and premalignant diseases. These results could be considered when choosing the surgical approach in these patients.

Comparison of robotic assistance and laparoscopy for pediatric choledochal cyst: advantages of robotic assistance.

Surgery for pediatric choledochal cyst (CC), complete excision (CE), and Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy anastomosis (HJA) can be performed using laparoscopy (Lap), robotic-assistance (Rob; da Vinci Xi/Si), or both (Lap/Rob). Lap was used exclusively between 2009 and 2021 (n = 31) and Rob was introduced in 2017 (n = 23). All subjects were matched for age, weight, BMI, and episodes of preoperative pancreatitis. For Rob, the first 15/23 were Lap-CE/Rob-HJA and the last 8/23 were Rob-CE/Rob-HJA. Total anastomotic time (TAT), TAT per suture during HJA, and time taken for dissection during CE were significantly shorter with less variance for Rob, although overall operative times were similar. Serum amylase on postoperative days 3, 5, and 7 were significantly higher for Lap. Times taken to ambulate, for return of bowel sounds, and discharge home were all significantly shorter for Rob. All postoperative complications occurred after Lap; HJA leak (n = 1; 3.2%), HJA stricture (n = 1; 3.2%), both treated by open re-HJA; and pancreatic fistula (n = 6; 19%), all treated conservatively. Dissection and recovery were faster with Rob while overcoming Lap-associated shortcomings to prevent complications associated with suturing. Both CE and HJA were safer and more reliable with Rob, a reflection of Rob's superiority.

Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration with primary closure is preferred for selected elderly individuals with choledocholithiasis.

Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration with primary closure (LCBDE-PC) exhibits more benefits than other surgeries for patients with choledocholithiasis. It remains unclear whether it is feasible for and beneficial to elderly individuals. This study aimed to clarify and stratify elderly patients who would benefit from LCBDE-PC. A retrospective study of 1240 patients with choledocholithiasis who underwent laparoscopic procedures between 2011 and 2019 was conducted. Patients were divided into the young group (<65 years old, n=708) and the elderly group (≥65 years old, n=532). Perioperative outcomes were compared between the two groups. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration with primary closure was successfully performed in 90.20% of the elderly and 94.20% of the young. No significant differences were observed between the two groups regarding reoperation, postoperative bile leakage, residual stones, drainage removal, and postoperative mortality. Compared with the young, the elderly had longer postoperative hospital stay (p=0.035) and delayed postoperative eating time (p=0.036) in the matched cohort. Independent risk factors for failed LCBDE-PC were preoperative pancreatitis (p=0.018), year of the surgeon's experience (p=0.008), preoperative C-reactive protein level (p=0.034), preoperative total bilirubin (p=0.021), impacted common bile duct (CBD) stones (p=0.006), blood loss (p=0.001), and edema of the CBD (p=0.001). A novel nomogram for predicting failed LCBDE-PC in elderly individuals exhibited a sufficient discriminative ability according to the estimated area under the curve (AUC) of 0.869 (95% CI: 0.817-0.921, p < 0.01). Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration with primary closure is safe, feasible, and effective for elderly individuals with choledocholithiasis. Elderly patients with a high risk of failed LCBDE-PC should be cautious of undergoing LCBDE-PC.

Splenic preservation versus splenectomy during laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for benign and low-grade malignant pancreatic tumor: A propensity score matching analysis

Previous studies showed the advantages of spleen preservation during laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) such as preventing overwhelming postsplenectomy infection, and early infectious complications, maintaining immune surveillance, less postoperative pancreatic fistula, less postpancreatectomy diabetes, and less gastric ileus. However, there were limitations of these results such as heterogenous population, and small number of patients. This study was aimed to compare clinical outcomes of patients with LDP with splenectomy (LDPS) and laparoscopic spleen preserving distal pancreatectomy (LSDP) using propensity score matching analysis from data of multi centers in Korea and Japan. The patients were identified who underwent LDPS and LSDP in Korea and Japan. Perioperative outcomes including postoperative infectious complication were compared between LDPS and LSDP before and after PSM. Matching variables were used such as nation, age, sex, BMI, ASA scores, underlying disease, previous abdominal surgery, preoperative pancreatitis, malignant disease and tumor locations. LDPS and LSDP were classified in 1,728 (39.6%), and 2,635 (60.4%), respectively. In the mean age and body mass index were 56.3 and 23.4. And 1,166 (26.7%) patients underwent previous abdominal surgery and tumor was located in body and tail in 2,041 (46.8%) and 2,290 (52.5%), respectively. Pancreas was transected at pancreas neck and tail level in 1,794 (41.1%) and 2,521 (57.8%), respectively. Splenic vessels were preserved in 1,244 (28.5%) of 2,635 patients with LSDP. Two hundred patients (4.6%) experienced conversion to open during surgery. Of patients, 1,303 (29.9%) patients experienced postoperative complications. Clinically related postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) and infectious complication rates were 693 (15.3%) and 760 (17.4%) patients, respectively. After PSM, 1,594 patients were selected in each group. The patients with LSDP showed comparable overall complication (35.7 % vs. 38.4 %, p = 0.094), however LSDP group showed lower infectious complications (15.2 % vs. 19.1 %, p = 0.036), CR-POPF (13.7 % vs. 18.7 %, p < 0.001), infected POPF (5.7 % vs. 9.7 %, p < 0.001), complicated fluid collection (0.94% vs. 2.82%, p < 0.001) compared with the patients with LDP. The results of this study showed that LSDP was related with lower infectious complication rate including lower infected POPF, and lower complicated fluid collection compared with LDPS, and this result is helpful to decide splenic preservation in patients who needs LDP for pancreatic body or tail lesions.

Comparison of metal stents versus plastic stents for preoperative biliary drainage: a meta-analysis of five randomized controlled trials.

Although routine preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) is generally not recommended for patients with malignant distal biliary obstruction (MDBO), it is still necessary in many cases. The objective of this study is to compare the effects of metal stents (MSs) and plastic stents (PSs) on PBD in patients with MDBO. All the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared MS with PS for PBD and published from the date of database establishment to September 2020 were identified by searching the PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane databases. Five RCTs involving 445 patients were included. There were 201 cases in the MS group, with 244 in the PS group. Re-interventions (relative risk (RR)=0.40, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.21-0.75, P= 0.004), stent occlusions (RR=0.36, 95% CI 0.18-0.75, P= 0.006), postoperative complications (RR=0.76, 95% CI 0.59-0.97, P= 0.03) and preoperative cholangitis (RR=0.19, 95% CI 0.05-0.78, P= 0.02) were lower in the MS group than in the PS group. Preoperative pancreatitis (RR=2.11, 95% CI 1.06-4.19, P= 0.03) was higher in the MS group than in the PS group. No significant difference was observed in the overall preoperative complications, postoperative pancreatic fistulas, delayed gastric emptying, wound infections and postoperative bleeding between these two groups. MS and PS exerted a similar effect on PBD, but PS had a higher risk of preoperative stent obstruction and postoperative complications, requiring more frequent interventions preoperatively. However, larger sample and higher quality RCTs are necessary for further verification.

Comparison of Curative Effect between Nasobiliary Drainage and Biliary Stenting in Malignant Biliary Obstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: To compare the efficacy of endoscopic nasobiliary drainage (ENBD) and endoscopic biliary stenting (EBS) in preoperative biliary drainage (PBD). Methods: ENBD and EBS related literature of patients with malignant biliary obstruction published before September 2019 were collected from PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library for comparison analysis. Revman 5.3 statistical software was used for analysis. Results: Nine studies were used for our comparative study. A total of 1435 patients were included, which consisted of 813 in the ENBD group and 622 in the EBS group. Meta-analysis showed that patients with malignant biliary obstruction who received ENBD had reductions in the rates of preoperative cholangitis (RR = 0.44, 95% CI = 0.34-0.58, P < 0.00001), preoperative pancreatitis (RR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.50-0.95, P =0.02), stent dysfunction (RR = 0.58, 95% CI = 0.43-0.80, P =0.0008), morbidity (RR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.64-0.93, P = 0.007) and postoperative pancreatic fistula (RR = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.45-0.92, P = 0.02) compared with patients who received EBS. Conclusions: The rates of preoperative cholangitis, preoperative pancreatitis, post-operative pancreatic fistula, stent dysfunction, and morbidity of ENBD patients were lower than those of EBS patients. In clinical practice, the physical condition of each patient and their tolerance should be fully considered. ENBD should be given priority. EBS should be replaced if stent dysfunction or intolerance occurs.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of factors associated with post-operative pancreatic fistula following pancreatoduodenectomy.

Many studies have explored factors relating to post-operative pancreatic fistula (POPF); however, the original definition (All-POPF) was revised to include only 'clinically relevant' (CR) POPF. This study identified variables associated with the two International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery definitions to identify which variables are more strongly associated with CR-POPF. A systematic review identified all studies reporting risk factors for POPF (using both International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula definitions) following pancreatoduodenectomy. The primary outcome was factors associated with CR-POPF. Meta-analyses (random effects models) of pre-, intra- and post-operative factors associated with POPF in more than two studies were included. Among 52 774 patients All-POPF (n=69 studies) and CR-POPF (n=53 studies) affected 27% (95% confidence interval (CI95% ) 23-30) and 19% (CI95% 17-22), respectively. Of the 176 factors, 24 and 17 were associated with All- and CR-POPF, respectively. Absence of pre-operative pancreatitis, presence of renal disease, no pre-operative neoadjuvant therapy, use of post-operative somatostatin analogues, absence of associated venous or arterial resection were associated with CR-POPF but not All-POPF. In conclusion this study demonstrates wide variation in reported rates of POPF and that several risk factors associated with CR-POPF are not used within risk prediction models. Data from this study can be used to shape future studies, research and audit across ethnic and geographic boundaries in POPF following pancreatoduodenectomy.

Pancreatic complications in pediatric choledochal cysts

Background/PurposeThe aim of this study is to clarify the clinical features and risk factors of pre- and postoperative pancreatic complications in pediatric choledochal cysts. MethodsA retrospective chart review was carried out on pediatric patients with choledochal cysts who underwent radical operation at our department. ResultsTwenty-one, 24, and 24 patients were classified into the Todani Ia, Ic, and IV-A choledochal cyst, respectively. Preoperative acute pancreatitis and protein plugs were observed in 31 (43.7%) and 11 (15.5%) patients, respectively. Patients with preoperative pancreatitis were more likely to have fusiform dilatation of choledochal cysts (79.3% vs. 35.0%) and a dilated common channel (53.9% vs. 23.1%) compared to those without preoperative pancreatitis. Compared to patients without preoperative protein plugs, those with protein plugs were more likely to have fusiform dilatation (90.9% vs. 46.5%) and pancreatic divisum with communicating ducts and a dilated ductal system (60.0% vs. 2.5%). Postoperatively, three patients (4.2%) experienced acute pancreatitis. One of these and all 3 had protein plugs and preoperative pancreatitis, respectively. ConclusionsFusiform-type choledochal cyst is a significant risk factor for preoperative pancreatic complications in choledochal cysts. While postoperative pancreatic complications were relatively rare, preoperative pancreatic complications might be risk factors for postoperative pancreatitis.

Laparoscopic Choledochal Cyst Excision: Lessons Learned in Our Experience

Choledochal cyst (CDC) is a rare biliary disorder. Surgical treatment consists of CDC excision and biliary-enteric reconstruction. Recently, some institutions have reported successful CDC excision by using minimally invasive techniques. In this study, we report our experience with the laparoscopic management of CDC, with a focus on key operative maneuvers that enhance the likelihood of successful excision. Following institutional review board approval, we performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent the laparoscopic excision of CDC and Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy. Between October 2003 and November 2007, we performed laparoscopic CDC excision in 9 patients (8 female and 1 male). Median age was 4 years (range, 8 months to 16 years). There were 7 type I and 2 type IV cysts, according to Todani's classification. Average cyst size was 4.4 cm (range, 1.3-8.5). The procedures were performed by utilizing four or five trochars. Six of 9 children presented with preoperative pancreatitis, 1 with abdominal pain, 1 with jaundice, and 1 was found incidentally. Three patients required the conversion to laparotomy due to dense adhesions, secondary to pancreatitis. Six patients underwent successful laparoscopic procedures, 5 had complete cyst excisions, and 1 underwent a proximal excision with distal mucosectomy. Of the 3 patients who required conversion, 2 underwent complete excisions; the other underwent a proximal excision, distal mucosectomy. There were no intraoperative complications. One patient had a postoperative bile leak that required an open hepaticojejunostomy revision. Eight patients had an uneventful recovery. Oral feedings were resumed within an average of 3.4 days (range, 2-9). Average time to discharge was 6.1 days (range, 5-12). Average follow-up time was 18 months (range, 4-48). No further laboratory abnormalities were detected in any of the patients. Laparoscopic resection of CDC and Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy in children is an excellent treatment option. Preoperative pancreatitis may cause increased technical difficulty, necessitating a conversion. Proximal excision with distal mucosectomy

Preoperative Acute Pancreatitis in Periampullary Tumors: Implications for Surgical Management

Background: Pancreatitis is the most serious complication of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), occurring in 2–20% of the patients. Currently there is no information about the impact of preoperative pancreatitis on the surgical management of periampullary tumors. Methods: Ten patients with periampullary tumors and preoperative acute pancreatitis were retrospectively analyzed. Four patients who underwent pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (group A) and 6 patients who underwent total pancreatectomy (group B) were compared with a matching control group (age, gender, stage, tumor and operation type) of 30 patients without pancreatitis (group C) who underwent an operation during the same period. Parameters analyzed were C-reactive protein (CRP), leukocytes, aminotransferases, amylase, lipase, operative time, blood loss, hospital stay, morbidity, and mortality. Results: In the study group, 5 patients had pancreatic adenocarcinoma, 3 had distal bile duct cancers, and 2 had ampullary tumors. None of the patients had severe acute necrotizing pancreatitis that necessitated intervention prior to tumor resection. Preoperative median CRP levels in group B were 8.4- and 5.6-fold higher than those of groups A and C, respectively. In contrast, leukocytes, aminotransferases, amylase, and lipase levels were not significantly different. The presence of acute pancreatitis slightly prolonged the duration of the operation (+15 min), increased morbidity (60 vs. 33%) and lengthened median hospital stay (19.5 vs. 14.5 days) in groups A and B vs. group C. All patients with preoperative pancreatitis were managed without mortality. Conclusion: Preoperative pancreatitis is more commonly seen in patients with non-pancreatic periampullary tumors, and considerably influences surgical management. High preoperative CRP levels indicate a more severe form of pancreatic damage that may necessitate a total pancreatectomy.

Pancreatitis After Biliary Tract Surgery

Pancreatitis associated with biliary tract operations continues to be an important clinical problem. The results of biliary tract operations performed on 1256 patients were carefully scrutinized for the presence of postoperative hyperamylasemia and pancreatitis persisting after 48 hours. Patients were evaluated in the context of the presence or absence of preoperative pancreatic dysfunction. Similarly, various operative risk factors were evaluated, including cholangiography, choledocholithiasis, common duct exploration, choledochoscopy, choledochoduodenostomy, and sphincteroplasty. Operative cholangiography did not induce postoperative pancreatitis. The incidence of postoperative pancreatitis following cholecystectomy was 0.6%, which was significantly greater than the incidence following common duct exploration (8.4%). Pancreatitis following biliary tract surgery seemed to be not directly related to the performance of choledochoscopy, sphincteroplasty, or choledochoduodenostomy, as it developed with similar frequency in patients undergoing common duct exploration alone. The timing of operative therapy in patients with biliary tract pancreatitis did not significantly alter the frequency with which pancreatitis persisted in the postoperative period. In 970 patients undergoing cholecystectomy, one patient who had preoperative pancreatitis died of postoperative pancreatitis. Of 286 patients undergoing common duct exploration, seven patients died with pancreatitis. In three of these patients there was no active preoperative pancreatitis, and in one of these patients pancreatitis was the cause of death. Four patients with preoperative pancreatitis eventually died of pancreatitis in the postoperative period. Pancreatitis is an important complication of biliary tract disease and operations, and all efforts should be extended to suppress its occurrence and development.

POSTOPERATIVE PANCREATITIS AS A COMPLICATION OF BILIARY SURGERY

Forty patients who underwent biliary surgery were investigated for postoperative pancreatic disturbance as measured by the amylase creatinine clearance ration (ACCR). Its relevance to preoperative pancreatitis, exploration of the common bile duct, and operative cholangiography were examined. The results suggested that a recent clinically proven episode of pancreatitis did not predispose to a postoperative recurrence following biliary surgery. Similarly, cholecystectomy alone did not produce a postoperative pancreatic disturbance. However, exploration of the common bile duct did frequently cause a postoperative elevated ACCR, and hence we recommend that duct exploration should be performed as carefully and as atraumatically as possible. The small number of patients who did not have operative cholangiograms prevented statistical evaluation of the effect of this procedure on the pancreas. However, information from elsewhere suggests that the plasma amylase level is not likely to be raised by cholangiography.