Preoperative Lymph Node Staging Research Articles

EO6 Preoperative lymph node staging of intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer using whole body integrated PET/MR with a 68Gallium-labelled ligand of prostate-specific membrane antigen

EO6 Preoperative lymph node staging of intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer using whole body integrated PET/MR with a 68Gallium-labelled ligand of prostate-specific membrane antigen

Endobronchial Ultrasonography for Positron Emission Tomography and Computed Tomography–Negative Lymph Node Staging in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Integrated positron emission tomography (PET) with computed tomography (CT) is a useful modality to investigate lymph node metastases for non-small cell lung cancer, but is less sensitive for normal-sized lymph nodes. We sometimes encounter cases with radiologically normal lymph nodes and unsuspected mediastinal metastases detected by endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA). However, few studies have investigated staging in patients with radiologically normal mediastina, and the accuracy of EBUS-TBNA staging for radiologically normal mediastina and hila is unclear. This study was a retrospective, single-institution review of a prospectively maintained database at Chiba Cancer Center between May 1, 2008, and September 1, 2013. We analyzed 113 non-small cell lung cancer patients with both CT-negative and PET/CT-negative lymph nodes (N0) in preoperative nodal staging performed by EBUS-TBNA. After preoperative staging was performed, patients with either N0 or N1 clinical staging underwent surgery. Final N factors were determined by mediastinal lymphadenectomy. In our study, the overall rate of N2 disease was 17.6% (20 of 113). For nodal staging by EBUS-TBNA, the sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy were 35.0% (7 of 20), 100% (93 of 93), 87.7% (93 of 106), and 88.4% (100 of 113), respectively. There were no severe complications from EBUS-TBNA staging. The overall rate of unsuspected N2 was not low. EBUS-TBNA was accurate and feasible for preoperative mediastinal nodal staging of non-small cell lung cancer with both CT-negative and PET/CT-negative lymph nodes. The sensitivity of EBUS-TBNA for radiologically normal mediastina and hila was low. Further investigations are required.

Does BMI affect the accuracy of preoperative axillary ultrasound in breast cancer patients?

Obesity affects 36 % of American women and is a well-documented breast cancer risk factor. Preoperative axillary ultrasound (AUS) is used routinely for axillary staging in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients; However, the impact of obesity on the usefulness of AUS is unknown. Our aim was to evaluate the effect of body mass index (BMI) on the performance of AUS. From our prospective breast surgery database, we identified 1,510 consecutive invasive breast cancers in patients undergoing primary surgery, including axillary operation, from January 2010 to July 2013. Preoperative AUS was performed in 1,375 cases (91 %). We analyzed patient, pathology and imaging data. Median BMI was 27.4 and 479 patients (36 %) were classified as obese (BMI ≥ 30). Most tumors were T1 (71 %) and estrogen receptor-positive (87 %). AUS was suspicious in 401 (29 %) patients, of whom 374 had ultrasound-guided lymph node fine-needle aspiration (FNA). Overall, 124 patients (33.2 %) were FNA positive. FNA identified disease preoperatively in 35.8 % of node-positive obese patients. For all BMI categories (normal, overweight, obese), AUS was predictive of pathologic nodal status (p < 0.0001). AUS sensitivity did not differ across BMI categories, while specificity and accuracy were better for overweight (p = 0.001 and 0.008, respectively) and obese (p = 0.007 and 0.02, respectively) patients, than for normal-BMI patients. Despite theoretical concern regarding both potential technical challenges and obesity-related lymph node alterations, the sensitivity of preoperative AUS for detecting nodal metastasis was similar in obese and non-obese patients, while specificity was better in obese patients. Preoperative AUS is valuable for preoperative nodal staging of obese breast cancer patients.

Erratum to: Preoperative lymph node staging in patients with primary prostate cancer: comparison and correlation of quantitative imaging parameters in diffusion-weighted imaging and 11C-choline PET/CT

Erratum to: Preoperative lymph node staging in patients with primary prostate cancer: comparison and correlation of quantitative imaging parameters in diffusion-weighted imaging and 11C-choline PET/CT

Computerized analysis of enhancement kinetics for preoperative lymph node staging in rectal cancer using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging

For this feasibility study, dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (dceMRI) was performed preoperatively in 9 patients with histologically proven rectal carcinoma. A total of 41 lymph nodes detected were matched to histopathology. Their contrast enhancement patterns were evaluated using computer-aided analysis and categorized in persistent, plateau, and washout curve type. Highest diagnostic accuracy for detecting malignancy was observed, when less than 31.8% of the voxels within a lymph node demonstrated a washout curve (sensitivity/specificity of 81.8%/89.7%; area under the curve, AUC=0.87). In comparison, conventional size measurements revealed lower AUC of 0.81 (sensitivity/specificity of 75%/72.4%). We conclude that dceMRI might be of diagnostic value for preoperative lymph node staging.

Current Approaches to Surgical Management of Lung Cancer

Accurate clinical staging of patients with non—small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is essential to optimize treatment and outcomes. This article discusses current perspectives on the surgical treatment of lung cancer, including the revised European Society of Thoracic Surgeons guidelines for preoperative mediastinal lymph node staging for NSCLC. Also discussed are how improvements in imaging and the use of computed tomography imaging for diagnostic workup and screening have led to many small lung cancers being found.

Diagnostic Accuracy of 11C-Choline PET/CT in Preoperative Lymph Node Staging of Bladder Cancer

The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of C-choline PET/CT in the preoperative evaluation of the nodal involvement of patients with bladder carcinoma (BC) suitable for radical cystectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection in comparison with contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) using the pathologic specimen as reference standard. Twenty-six consecutive patients (69.5 ± 9.3 years; range, 49-84) with histologically proven transitional cell BC were treated with radical cystectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection and were enrolled from April 2011 to January 2013. In all patients, paravesical, internal, eternal, and common iliac nodes as well as obturatory, presacral, preaortic, and precaval lymph nodes (LNs) were dissected up to the origin of the inferior mesentery artery. The areas of the LN dissection were grouped as follow: region A included preaortic and precaval LNs; region B included paravesical, common, internal and external iliac, obturatory, and presacral LNs in the right pelvis; region C included paravesical, common, internal and external iliac, obturatory, and presacral LNs in the left pelvis. C-choline PET/CT and abdominal CECT were used to assess the presence of lymph node metastases on a per patient, region, and lesion analysis using the results of surgical specimens obtained at operation as criterion standard. Seven of 26 patients (26.9%) showed nodal metastases at pathologic analysis. Overall, 844 LNs were evaluated, and 38 of them (4.5%) showed metastatic involvement. On a patient-based analysis, C-choline PET/CT showed a sensitivity of 42% and specificity of 84%, whereas, CECT showed a sensitivity of 14% and specificity of 89%. On a region-based analysis, C-choline PET/CT showed a sensitivity of 11% and specificity of 82%, whereas CECT showed a sensitivity of 5% and specificity of 80%. On a lesion (LN)-based analysis, C-choline PET/CT showed a sensitivity of 10% and specificity of 64%, whereas CECT showed a sensitivity of 2% and specificity of 63%. C-choline PET/CT could provide additional diagnostic information in preoperative nodal staging of patients with invasive BC in comparison with CECT. A study with a larger population should determine if C-choline PET/CT could be recommended as a routine technique in high-risk patients with BC.

Prediction of Nodal Involvement in Primary Rectal Carcinoma without Invasion to Pelvic Structures: Accuracy of Preoperative CT, MR, and DWIBS Assessments Relative to Histopathologic Findings

ObjectiveTo investigate the accuracy of preoperative computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging with background body signal suppression (DWIBS) in the prediction of nodal involvement in primary rectal carcinoma patients in the absence of tumor invasion into pelvic structures.Methods and MaterialsFifty-two subjects with primary rectal cancer were preoperatively assessed by CT and MRI at 1.5 T with a phased-array coil. Preoperative lymph node staging with imaging modalities (CT, MRI, and DWIBS) were compared with the final histological findings.ResultsThe accuracy of CT, MRI, and DWIBS were 57.7%, 63.5%, and 40.4%. The accuracy of DWIBS with higher sensitivity and negative predictive value for evaluating primary rectal cancer patients was lower than that of CT and MRI. Nodal staging agreement between imaging and pathology was fairly strong for CT and MRI (Kappa value = 0.331 and 0.348, P<0.01) but was relatively weaker for DWIBS (Kappa value = 0.174, P<0.05). The accuracy was 57.7% and 59.6%, respectively, for CT and MRI when the lymph node border information was used as the criteria, and was 57.7% and 61.5%, respectively, for enhanced CT and MRI when the lymph node enhancement pattern was used as the criteria.ConclusionMRI is more accurate than CT in predicting nodal involvement in primary rectal carcinoma patients in the absence of tumor invasion into pelvic structures. DWIBS has a great diagnostic value in differentiating small malignant from benign lymph nodes.

Tc-99m depreotide SPECT/CT for lymph node staging of non-small-cell lung cancer

To investigate the potential role of Tc-99m depreotide (Tc-DEPR) in the preoperative lymph node (N) staging of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Sixty-one patients with NSCLC at the potentially operable stage were enrolled and underwent scintigraphy before surgery (n=56) or mediastinoscopy (n=5). Imaging was performed with a hybrid single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) system. Depreotide uptake in N stations was evaluated visually and semi-quantitatively and compared to histology. Quantification was carried out in attenuation-corrected SPECT slices. Different sites of normal uptake were used as a reference for comparison with lesional uptake. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was employed to identify the most preferable reference area and the cut-off best discriminating disease-free from disease-involved lymph nodes. With reference to 53 Ν1 hilar and 147 Ν2/Ν3 sampled stations, sensitivity of scintigraphy by visual interpretation was 100 and 94%, specificity 43 and 59% and accuracy 55 and 67%, respectively. No patient was down-staged, but 52% were incorrectly up-staged and 44% were misclassified as inoperable. Compared to scintigraphy, preoperative contrast-enhanced diagnostic CT demonstrated lower sensitivity (36% for hilar and 73% for N2/N3 stations), higher specificity (79 and 75%) and similar accuracy (70 and 75%). Regarding the ultimate N-stage and the prediction of surgical disease, diagnostic CT was wrong in 51 and 34% of cases. Dichotomy of quantitative scintigraphic data by the use of certain N-to-spine ratio cut-offs resulted in a significant increase of specificity (76% for hilar and 89% for N2/N3 stations), while sensitivity remained high (82% in both circumstances) and accuracy for Ν2/Ν3 stations was substantially improved (88%). By this quantitative approach, misclassifications as to the N-stage and patient operability (25 and 16%) were considerably less than that of visual Tc-DEPR and diagnostic CT interpretations. Tc-99m depreotide SPECT/CT seems to have a role in the N-staging of NSCLC, mainly because of its high sensitivity and negative predictive value. Quantification of uptake can improve specificity, at a low cost of sensitivity. If F-18 fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography is not available, this method may be used as a surrogate to conventional staging modalities.

Revised ESTS guidelines for preoperative mediastinal lymph node staging for non-small-cell lung cancer

Accurate preoperative staging and restaging of mediastinal lymph nodes in patients with potentially resectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is of paramount importance. In 2007, the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS) published an algorithm on preoperative mediastinal staging integrating imaging, endoscopic and surgical techniques. In 2009, the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) introduced a new lymph node map. Some changes in this map have an important impact on mediastinal staging. Moreover, more evidence of the different mediastinal staging technique has become available. Therefore, a revision of the ESTS guidelines was needed. In case of computed tomography (CT)-enlarged or positron emission tomography (PET)-positive mediastinal lymph nodes, tissue confirmation is indicated. Endosonography [endobronchial ultrasonography (EBUS)/esophageal ultrasonography (EUS)] with fine-needle aspiration (FNA) is the first choice (when available), since it is minimally invasive and has a high sensitivity to rule in mediastinal nodal disease. If negative, surgical staging with nodal dissection or biopsy is indicated. Video-assisted mediastinoscopy is preferred to mediastinoscopy. The combined use of endoscopic staging and surgical staging results in the highest accuracy. When there are no enlarged lymph nodes on CT and when there is no uptake in lymph nodes on PET or PET-CT, direct surgical resection with systematic nodal dissection is indicated for tumours ≤ 3 cm located in the outer third of the lung. In central tumours or N1 nodes, preoperative mediastinal staging is indicated. The choice between endoscopic staging with EBUS/EUS and FNA or video-assisted mediastinoscopy depends on local expertise to adhere to minimal requirements for staging. For tumours >3 cm, preoperative mediastinal staging is advised, mainly in adenocarcinoma with high standardized uptake value. For restaging, invasive techniques providing histological information are advisable. Both endoscopic techniques and surgical procedures are available, but their negative predictive value is lower compared with the results obtained in baseline staging. An integrated strategy using endoscopic staging techniques to prove mediastinal nodal disease and mediastinoscopy to assess nodal response after induction therapy needs further study.

Beyond conventional pathology: Towards preoperative and intraoperative lymph node staging

Accurate detection of lymph node metastases is critical for many solid tumours to guide treatment strategies and determine prognostic outcomes. The gold standard for detection of metastasis is by histological analysis of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) sections of removed lymph nodes; this analysis method has remained largely unchanged for decades. Recent studies have highlighted limitations in the sensitivity of this approach, at least in its current clinical use, to detect very small metastatic deposits. Importantly, the poor prognostic outcomes associated with the presence of such small tumour deposits are now well established in a number of cancers. In addition, histological analysis of FFPE sections cannot be used practically for intraoperative node assessment. Novel lymph node staging technologies are therefore actively being developed. This review critically presents the main advances in this field and discusses why these technologies have not been able to provide a better alternative to the current gold standard diagnostic technique.

Integrated positron emission tomography and computed tomography in preoperative lymph node staging of non-small cell lung cancer

Background Integrated positron emission tomography and computed tomography (PET/CT) is increasingly used for the preoperative nodal staging of non-smail cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of PET/CT in comparison with CT in detection of nodal metastasis and preoperative nodal staging in patients with NSCLC, and to analyze the causes of the PET/CT false-negative and false-positive results. Methods Consecutive patients with pathologically proven NSCLC who underwent staging using PET/CT from July 2008 to February 2012 were evaluated retrospectively. Nodal staging was pathologically confirmed on tissue specimens obtained at thoracotomy. The accuracy of PET/CT and CT in the assessment of intrathoracic nodal involvement was determined using histological results as the reference standard. Logistic regression was used to define the causes of the false-negative and false-positive results. Results A total of 528 lymph node stations were evaluated in 101 patients. Lymph nodes were positive for malignancy in 43 out of 101 patients (42.6%), and 101 out of 528 nodal stations (19.2%). PET/CT was significantly more accurate for nodal staging than CT. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy of PET/CT for detecting nodal metastasis were 51.5%, 95.8%, 74.3%, 89.3%, and 87.3% and the corresponding data by CT were 45.5%, 87.1%, 45.5%, 87.1%, and 79.2%, respectively. PET/CT confers significantly higher specificity, positive predictive value, and accuracy than CT in detecting nodal metastasis. False-negative results by PET/CT are significantly associated with smaller lymph node size, whereas false-positive results are related to a combination of inflammatory disorders and larger lymph node size. Conclusion PET/CT confers significantly higher accuracy than CT in nodal staging, and is more specific and accurate than CT in detecting nodal metastasis but has a low sensitivity and high false-negative rate.

Prospective comparison of computed tomography, diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and [11C]choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography for preoperative lymph node staging in prostate cancer patients

The aim of this study was to prospectively compare diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) and [(11)C]choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) with computed tomography (CT) for preoperative lymph node (LN) staging in prostate cancer (PCa) patients. Between June 2010 and May 2012, CT, DWI and [(11)C]choline PET/CT were performed preoperatively in 33 intermediate- and high-risk PCa patients undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) and extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) including obturator fossa and internal, external and common iliac fields. Patient- and field-based performance characteristics for all three imaging techniques based on histopathological results are reported. Imaging techniques were compared by means of the area under the curve (AUC). LN metastases were detected in 92 of 1,012 (9%) LNs from 14 of 33 (42%) patients. On patient-based analysis, sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for CT were 57, 68 and 64%, respectively, for DWI were 57, 79 and 70%, respectively, and for [(11)C]choline PET/CT were 57, 90 and 76%, respectively. On field-based analysis, these numbers for CT were 47, 94 and 88%, respectively, for DWI were 56, 97 and 92%, respectively, and for [(11)C]choline PET/CT were 62, 96 and 92%, respectively. Neither DWI nor [(11)C]choline PET/CT performed significantly better than CT on pairwise comparison of patient- and field-based results. All three imaging techniques exhibit a rather low sensitivity with less than two thirds of LN metastases being detected on patient- and field-based analysis. Overall diagnostic efficacy did not differ significantly between imaging techniques, whereas distinct performance characteristics, esp. patient-based specificity, were best for [(11)C]choline PET/CT followed by DWI and CT.

Endobronchial Ultrasonography-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration Biopsy for Preoperative Nodal Staging of Lung Cancer in a Veteran Population

Recently, preoperative lung cancer staging has evolved to include endobronchial ultrasonography-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) biopsies of the hilar and mediastinal lymph nodes, but the feasibility and usefulness of the procedure have not been well studied in the veteran population. To determine the safety and effectiveness of EBUS-TBNA as a key component of a preoperative staging algorithm for lung cancer in veterans. Review of a prospectively maintained thoracic surgery database that includes patients who underwent lung resection for lung cancer between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2012, at a single Veterans Affairs medical center among a consecutive cohort of 166 patients with clinically early-stage (I or II) lung cancer who underwent lobectomy with nodal dissection. Endobronchial ultrasonography-guided transbronchial needle aspiration mediastinal staging (EBUS group) in 62 patients (37.3%) was compared with noninvasive nodal staging plus integrated positron emission tomography-computed tomography only (PET/CT-only group) in 104 patients (62.7%). The accuracy of nodal staging was assessed by comparison with the final pathological staging after complete nodal dissection (the gold standard). Primary outcomes were feasibility, safety, accuracy, and negative predictive value of EBUS-TBNA for preoperative nodal staging. A secondary outcome was the rate of nontherapeutic lung resection for occult N2 disease, with comparison between the EBUS group and the PET/CT-only group. No significant complications were attributable to the EBUS-TBNA procedure. In the EBUS group, 258 lymph node stations were sampled. N1 hilar metastases were diagnosed in 8 patients (12.9%) before surgery, and the remainder were staged N0. Accuracy and negative predictive value of EBUS-TBNA were 93.5% (58 of 62) and 92.6% (50 of 54), respectively. The overall rate of nontherapeutic lung resection performed in patients with occult N2 disease was 10.8% (18 of 166) (8.1% in the EBUS group and 12.5% in the PET/CT-only group) (P = .37). A preoperative lung cancer staging strategy that includes EBUS-TBNA seems to be safe and effective in a veteran population, resulting in a low rate of nontherapeutic operations because of occult N2 nodal disease.

Axillary ultrasound for preoperative nodal staging in breast cancer patients: Is it of added value?

BackgroundNew insights show that an axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) may not always be indicated for metastases detected by ultrasound (pathologically proven). This study investigated whether axillary ultrasound accurately predicts pN0, pN1 and pN2–pN3 status. MethodsData were retrospectively collected from all consecutive patients with invasive breast cancer who underwent (primary) surgery between 2008 and 2012. False negative percentages and negative predictive values (NPVs) for sonographic nodal staging were calculated for all patients and again for cT1–2 patients treated by breast conserving therapy (BCT). ResultsA total of 577 axillary ultrasounds were included. After negative ultrasound findings (cN0), pathology showed pN2–pN3 disease in 4.4% of these cases, with an NPV of 95.5% (93.4–97.1%). When cN1 (1–3 suspicious nodes) was predicted, pathology showed pN2–pN3 disease in 41.2%, with an NPV of 58.5% (44.2–71.5%).In the subgroup of patients with cT1–2 breast cancer that were treated by BCT, pathology showed pN2–pN3 disease in 2.3% after negative ultrasound findings (cN0), with an NPV of 97.7% (94.9–99.0%). When cN1 was predicted (n = 12), pathology showed pN2–pN3 disease in 50.0%, with an NPV of 50.0% (22.3–77.9%). A direct ALND was performed in these 12 cN1 cases; pathology showed six patients with pN1 (three patients with one and three with two macrometastases) and six with pN2–pN3 disease (4, 5, 11, 13, 16 or 22 macrometastases, respectively). ConclusionIn conclusion, a negative axillary ultrasound generally excludes the presence of pN2–pN3 disease. An axillary ultrasound cannot accurately differentiate between pN1 and pN2–pN3. It could be argued that the standard performance of an axillary ultrasound in breast cancer patients is questionable; multidisciplinary discussion could guide decisions on the use of axillary ultrasound for the individual patient.

Second-look axillary ultrasound after breast MRI for enhanced preoperative nodal staging in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients.

98 Background: Concomitant with widespread adoption of axillary ultrasound (AUS) with ultrasound-guided needle biopsy (USNB) of suspicious lymph nodes (LN) for preoperative nodal staging of breast cancer patients, utilization of breast MRI, which includes axillary imaging, has increased. Little is known about the added value of MRI imaging of the axilla in this context. We undertook this study to assess the role of breast MRI in preoperative axillary nodal staging. Methods: We studied 988 consecutive invasive breast cancers in patients undergoing primary operation including axillary surgery, without neoadjuvant therapy, from 2010-2011. Results: 505 patients (51%) underwent MRI of which 168 (33%) demonstrated suspicious findings in the axilla. Abnormal axillary MRI findings included cortical thickening, edema, enhancement, hilar effacement, and/or altered shape and size. 114 patients had findings concordant with AUS. 54 patients had suspicious LNs on MRI either without a preceding AUS (33 cases) or after an initially negative AUS (21 cases). Second look AUS was performed in 29 of these cases and was abnormal in 3 (10%) in whom USNB confirmed metastatic adenopathy. Of the 54 cases with MRI-detected suspicious LNs 20 (37%) were node positive at operation with a pN stage of N0 (63%), N0i+ (5%), N1mic (4%), N1 (20%), N2 (6%), N3 (2%); extranodal extension was seen in 7 of 20 node-positive patients (35%). Conclusions: Second look AUS, when performed secondary to suspicious axillary MRI findings, identified LN metastasis preoperatively in 10% of patients. When MRI is done to evaluate the breast in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients, axillary findings can enhance the accuracy of preoperative nodal staging. We recommend second look AUS when MRI demonstrates suspicious axillary LN findings. [Table: see text]

Accuracy of axillary ultrasound in preoperative nodal staging of breast cancer - size of metastases as limiting factor

Since the performance of surgical procedures of the axilla in the treatment of early breast cancer is decreasing, the role of axillary ultrasound (AUS) as staging procedere has newly to be addressed. The aim of this study was to determine which patient or histopathological characteristics are related to false-negative AUS. In a retrospective study design data of 470 women with primary breast cancer were collected from patient charts and imaging and pathology records were reviewed. True positive and false negative axillary ultrasound groups were compared in terms of tumor size, histological subtype, grade, estrogen receptor (ER) and HER2 status, proliferation index, number and size of nodal metastases, extracapsular extension (ECE) and lymphovascular invasion (LVI). Of 470 patients, 166 (35%) were node positive, 79 of them with suspicious AUS. Factors associated with false negative AUS by univariate analysis were included in a multivariate model. By multivariate analysis, only size of nodal metastases was an independent factor for false negative AUS. In the sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) subgroup, 45% of patients had nodal metastasis size less than or equal to 5 mm. In conclusion, AUS in preoperative staging of early stage breast cancer is limited by small size of metastases in a substantial number of patients. Prospective studies have to show whether small metastatic deposits leaving in patients in case of no axillary surgery have no negative effect on disease free and overall survival.

Lymph node dissection during radical cystectomy for bladder cancer treatment: considerations on relevance and extent.

Despite advances in the surgical and medical treatment for urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB), there have only been limited improvements in disease-specific mortality rates over the past decades. Lymph node dissection (LND) during radical cystectomy is an integral part of the treatment for muscle-invasive and high-risk UCB. LND may detect and remove lymph node (LN) metastasis and thus guide patient counseling and decision making regarding additional treatment decisions. In addition, LND may improve survival in patients both with and without LN metastasis. In this non-systematic review article, we discuss benefits and risks of LND, the role of limited versus extended LND and the dilemma of preoperative LN staging.

FDG PET/CT for the preoperative nodal staging of non-small cell lung cancer in a tuberculosis-endemic country: Are maximum standardized uptake values useful?

The aim of this study was to determine an optimum standardized uptake value threshold for identifying nodal metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients using Fluorine-18 2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in Taiwan, a tuberculosis-endemic country. The variation in standardized uptake values of nodal metastasis among different NSCLC histological subtypes was also evaluated. We retrospectively reviewed 75 NSCLC patients who had received FDG PET/CT before surgery. The diagnostic accuracy of FDG PET/CT for the preoperative nodal staging was evaluated by histopathologic findings. A total of 316 nodal stations were evaluated. The sensitivity and specificity of FDG PET/CT for nodal staging were 58.6% and 81.8%, respectively, using an SUV cut-off of 2.6. With regard to the levels of mean SUVmax in true-positive and false-positive groups, there was no significant difference among different histological subtypes. The present study demonstrated that FDG PET/CT for pre-operative nodal staging using SUVmax > 2.6 is a useful tool (with a higher specificity and a higher negative predictive value) to rule out the possibility of metastatic lymphadenopathy in operable patients with NSCLC.

Is CT-based selective nodal irradiation safe for clinical stage N0-1 LD-SCLC patients?

e18551 Background: Radiotherapy plays an important role in the management of limited-disease small-cell lung cancer (LD-SCLC). However, volume of irradiation remains unanswered as well as optimal total dose, timing and sequencing of radiation. In this study, we compared the clinical lymph node staging with pathological staging, with the aim of investigating the safety of CT-based selective nodal irradiation for clinical stage N0-1 LD-SCLC patients. Methods: From July 2004 to March 2012, 20 potentially operable patients with clinical stage N0-1 LD-SCLC underwent contrast-enhanced CT scans and other routine initial staging procedures followed by radical resection of primary tumor and systemic intra-thoracic lymph node dissection. The results of reviewing clinical staging for the mediastinal lymph node metastases were compared with pathologic findings. Results: Preoperative nodal staging was compared with postoperative pathological staging, 35% (7 of 20) of patients were under staged by clinical staging. Of all the 7 patients with mediastinal lymph node metastases, 4 patients (57.1%) had subcrinal nodes (station 7) metastases, 1 had right upper paratracheal nodes (station 2R) metastases, 1 had left lower paratracheal nodes (station 4L) metastases, 1 had aortopulmonary nodes (station 5) metastases. Conclusions: CT-based selective nodal irradiation for LD-SCLC may result in geographical miss in clinical stage N0-1 patients. Mediastinal lymph node regions especially the subcrinal nodes should be contained in the clinical target volume for radiotherapy.