Preoperative Endoscopic Tattooing Research Articles

S442 The Effect of Preoperative Endoscopic Tattooing on Lymph Node Retrieval in Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

S442 The Effect of Preoperative Endoscopic Tattooing on Lymph Node Retrieval in Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The effect of preoperative endoscopic tattooing on lymph node retrieval in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

The effect of preoperative endoscopic tattooing (ET) on accurate colorectal cancer localization and resection has been well established. However, its effect on lymph node (LN) retrieval remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to systematically compare LN retrieval between patients with colorectal cancer who underwent preoperative ET and those who did not. A systematic search for relevant studies was conducted using the following databases: PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science. Studies that compared LN retrieval in patients with colorectal cancer with and without preoperative ET were included. Weighted pooled odds ratio (OR) and mean difference (MD) with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for all outcomes using the random-effects model were calculated. 10 studies, including 2231 patients with colorectal cancer were included. Six studies reported total LN yield and showed significantly higher LN yield in the tattooed group (MD:2.61; 95% CI:1.01-4.21, P=0.001). Seven studies reported the number of patients with adequate LN retrieval and showed a significantly higher number of patients with adequate LN retrieval in the tattooed group (OR:1.89, 95% CI:1.08-3.32, P=0.03). However, subgroup analysis revealed that both outcomes were only statistically significant in patients with rectal cancer, and not in patients with colon cancer. Our results suggest that preoperative ET is associated with increased LN retrieval in patients with rectal cancer, but not in colon cancer. Further large-scale randomized control trials are necessary to validate our findings.

The effect of preoperative endoscopic tattooing using India ink on lymph node yield in laparoscopic colectomy for stage I right-sided colon cancer.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of preoperative endoscopic tattooing using India ink (ETI) on the number of retrieved lymph nodes (LNs) dissected during laparoscopic surgery for stage I right-sided colon cancer (RCC). This single-center, retrospective study included stage I RCC patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery between January 2010 and December 2021. The clinicopathological background and number of LNs retrieved were compared between patients managed with and without ETI. A multiple linear regression analysis was used to examine the effect of independent variables on the LN yield. A total of 169 patients were enrolled. Of these, 89 patients (52.7%) were classified into the ETI group, and 80 (47.3%) were classified into the no-ETI group. There were no significant differences in age, sex, body mass index, or tumor progression between the two groups. A univariate analysis showed that the number of LNs retrieved was significantly higher in female (26 vs. 24, p = 0.026), with tumor localization in the ascending or transverse colon (20 in the cecum, 26 in the ascending colon, 27 in the transverse colon, p < 0.001), and with preoperative ETI (28 vs. 21, p < 0.001). In a multivariate linear regression analysis, female sex (p = 0.0011), D3 lymphadenectomy (p = 0.046), and preoperative ETI (p = 0.012) were independently associated with the LN yield. In laparoscopic surgery for stage I RCC, preoperative ETI increased the number of LNs retrieved and allowed for appropriate staging.

Preoperative endoscopic tattoo marking improves lymph node retrieval in laparoscopic rectal resection: a retrospective cohort study.

Harvesting at least 12 lymph nodes (LNs) is recommended for adequate tumor staging in colon surgery. Although preoperative endoscopic tattooing has been used for primary localization of tumors, its impact on LN retrieval in colorectal surgery remains controversial. We aimed to investigate the relationship between preoperative tattooing and LN retrieval after laparoscopic rectal resection. We reviewed the records of 92 patients with rectal cancer who underwent laparoscopic resection from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2019. Patients were categorized into 2 groups according to whether preoperative endoscopic tattooing was performed. The rate of adequate LN retrieval (≥12) was compared. The tattooed and non-tattooed groups comprised 49 and 43 patients, respectively. In the tattooed and non-tattooed groups, the rates of adequate LN retrieval were 75.5% and 55.8%, respectively (P=0.046). Univariate analysis revealed that female sex, tattooing, LN metastasis status, pathological pathological stage (p-stage), and LN dissection were predictive factors for adequate LN retrieval. In the multivariate analysis, female sex (odds ratio [OR], 3.34; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15-9.73; P=0.027), tattooing (OR, 2.87; 95% CI, 1.03-7.94; P=0.043), and p-stage (OR, 3.34; 95% CI, 1.04-10.75; P=0.043) were independent predictive factors for adequate LN retrieval after surgery. This study revealed that preoperative endoscopic tattooing was statistically significantly associated with adequate LN retrieval in patients with rectal cancer who underwent laparoscopic rectal resection. Preoperative endoscopic tattooing should be considered to improve disease assessment and avoid stage migration.

Preoperative Colonoscopic Tattooing Using a Direct Injection Method with Indocyanine Green for Localization of Colorectal Tumors: An Efficacy and Safety Comparison Study.

PurposeEndoscopic tattooing is used to mark colorectal lesions for subsequent surgery. As a tattooing agent, India ink has been widely used but is not currently available in Korea. Indocyanine green (ICG) can be applied as an alternative agent. However, studies on colonoscopic tattooing by the direct injection of indocyanine green are lacking. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety between an ICG direct injection method and an India ink saline test injection method.MethodsA total of 227 patients who underwent preoperative endoscopic tattooing for colorectal neoplasm (149 patients in the ICG direct injection group and 78 patients in the India ink saline test injection group) were included in the study. The efficacy of the two methods was compared by visualization and safety was compared by evaluating the perioperative tattooing complications.ResultsThe visualization of lesions in the ICG group was not different from that of the India ink group (p=0.42, 96.0% vs 98.7%, respectively). Only one patient in the ICG group had abdominal pain related to tattooing, but no complications developed in the India ink group.ConclusionConsidering the good visualization and low complication rate, the direct injection of ICG can be used as an alternative tattooing method.

Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy and Primary Anastomosis for Tubulovillous Polyp with Preoperative Endoscopic Tattooing as A Preventive Treatment in High Risk Colorectal Cancer Patient Case Report and Review

It is well established that colorectal cancer (CRC) develops from a series of precursor epithelial polyps [1], which include conventional adenomas, incorporating tubular adenomas and villous/tubulovillous adenomas...

Role of endoscopic tumor tattooing in improving lymph node retrieval of colorectal cancer

Background and study aims Adequate lymphadenectomy is crucial to ensure accuracy in staging and treatment of colorectal cancer. Endoscopic preoperative tattooing to mark the location of the tumor has recently been proposed to promote the recovery of lymph nodes in colorectal specimens. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the role of preoperative endoscopic tumor tattooing in improving the retrieval of lymph nodes in colorectal resections. Patients and methods The study was conducted on 100 candidates randomized into two groups. The first group included 50 patients who were injected with black eye dye by colonoscopy done 3–10 days before surgery (tattooed group), and the 50 other patients in the second group (control group) did not have preoperative tattooing. All patients underwent the standard resection under National Comprehensive Cancer Network Colorectal Cancers Guideline. Results The tattooed group showed higher number of lymph nodes retrieved compared with the control group in colon cases and rectum cases. In eight cases, among the patients included in our study, extra-anatomical lymph nodes (outside the standard resection margins) were detected stained. Of these eight cases, two showed malignant deposits. Conclusion Preoperative endoscopic tattooing of colorectal cancers is a safe and easy technique, which proved to have a benefit in improving lymph node retrieval for resected specimens of colorectal cancers either in obese or nonobese patients and also whether they had received or not a preoperative neoadjuvant therapy. There is a connection between lymphatics draining different parts of the colon, as proved by the presence of tattooed lymph nodes outside the standard resection margins. Its clinical significance needs more studies on a larger sample size.

Preoperative endoscopic tattooing using India ink to determine the resection margins during totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

This study was conducted to determine whether establishing the proximal resection line using India ink tattooing can ensure safe resection margins during totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy. This retrospective study included 81 patients who underwent totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer on the lower two-thirds of the stomach. The proximal resection margins were analyzed with respect to the macroscopic type and clinical T stage, and the intraoperative appearance of the stain on the serosa was classified by reviewing surgical videos. R0 resection was performed in all patients. The rates of the intended margins were 89.2% in patients without a frozen section diagnosis and 84.2% in patients with differentiated type lesions who underwent a frozen section diagnosis; however, most patients with undifferentiated advanced lesions failed to achieve the intended resection margins. Intraoperative appearance revealed that 85.2% of patients had localized type stains, whereas 11.1% had widespread-type stains. Our procedure to determine the proximal resection line in totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy is oncologically safe. However, careful observation of the resected specimen and a frozen section analysis should be performed for undifferentiated advanced lesions.

Preoperative Endoscopic Tattooing for Laparoscopic Subtotal Gastrectomy as a Conservative Approach in Type 1 Neuroendocrine Tumor: A Case Report and Review

Preoperative Endoscopic Tattooing for Laparoscopic Subtotal Gastrectomy as a Conservative Approach in Type 1 Neuroendocrine Tumor: A Case Report and Review

Preoperative endoscopic tattooing technique improved lymph node retrieval in rectal cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy

AimsTo describe the clinical utility of lymph node retrieval and prognostic value of tattooing in rectal cancer (RC) patients undergoing neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT).MethodsA total 97 RC patients underwent preoperative...

Preoperative endoscopic tattooing for colonic polyp localization: From blue to black.

When surgical polypectomy and not segmental resection is planned, preoperative endoscopic tattooing with high‐volume undiluted methylene blue should be avoided as it can result in colon perforation.

Endoscopic tattooing of colorectal neoplasms removed by laparoscopy: a proposal for selective marking.

Preoperative endoscopic tattooing is an effective procedure to identify small intraoperative neoplasms. However, there are no defined criteria with regard to the indications for endoscopic tattooing of these lesions at the time of diagnosis. The aim of this study was to establish endoscopic criteria that allow the selection of patients who will need a tattoo during the diagnostic colonoscopy. An ambispective study of patients undergoing laparoscopy due to a colorectal neoplasia who underwent endoscopic tattooing during the period from 2007-2013 and 2016-2017. According to the endoscopic description of the neoplasms, the classification was polypoid lesions, neoplasms occupying < 50% or ≥ 50% of the intestinal lumen and stenosing neoplasias. Tattooing of the lesion was performed in 120 patients and the same lesions were identified during surgery in 114 (95%) cases. Most of the neoplasias described as polypoids and neoplasias that occupied < 50% of the intestinal lumen were not visualized during surgery and therefore required a tattoo (33 of 42 and 18 of 26 respectively, p = 0.0001, X2). On the other hand, stenosing lesions or neoplasias occupying ≥ 50% of the intestinal lumen were mostly identified during surgery (15 of 15 and 36 of 37 respectively, p = 0.0001, X2) without the need for a tattoo. Overall, the identification of neoplasms according to established criteria was 98%. These results suggest that it is possible to establish endoscopic criteria that allow a successful selective tattooing during diagnostic endoscopy.

The Effects of Preoperative Endoscopic Tattooing on Distal Surgical Margin and Ileostomy Rates in Laparoscopic Rectal Cancer Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Study.

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of endoscopic marking on the distal surgical margin and ileostomy rates in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery. Forty patients, who underwent surgery between September 2012 and December 2013 for rectal cancer limited to or with invasion of the upper rectum, were included in the study. The distal tumor margin was marked with purified carbon particles by colonoscopy before surgery in one group (n=20); no marking was performed in the second group (n=20). Patients were assigned randomly to each group. Laparoscopic anterior or low-anterior resection was performed in all patients. Demographic and operative data, pathology results, morbidity, and ileostomy rates were measured. There was no statistically significant difference in the demographic data, the tumor size, the amount of bleeding, the specimen length, the harvested lymph node number, postoperative complications, the length of hospital stay, rehospitalization, and the operation duration between groups 1 and 2, respectively. The distal surgical margin was significantly shorter in the marked group. The protective ileostomy rates were also lower in the marked group; however, the difference did not reach statistical significance. Preoperative endoscopic tattooing decreases distal resection margins and may reduce protective ileostomy rates in laparoscopic rectal surgery.

Endoscopic tattooing of early colon carcinoma enhances detection of lymph nodes most prone to harbor tumor burden

BackgroundColorectal cancer (CRC) screening programs result in the detection of early-stage asymptomatic carcinomas suitable to be surgically cured. Lymph nodes (LN) from early CRC are usually small and may be difficult to collect. Still, at least 12 LNs should be analyzed from colectomies, to ensure a reliable pN0 stage. Presurgical endoscopic tattooing improves LN procurement. In addition, molecular detection of occult LN tumor burden in histologically pN0 CRC patients is associated with a decreased survival rate. We aimed to study the impact of presurgical endoscopic tattooing on the molecular detection of LN tumor burden in early colon neoplasms.MethodsA prospective cohort study from a CRC screening-based population was performed at a tertiary academic hospital. LNs from colectomies with and without preoperative endoscopic tattooing were assessed by two methods, hematoxylin and eosin (HE), and RT-LAMP, to detect tumor cytokeratin 19 (CK19) mRNA. We compared the amount of tumor burden and LN yields from tattooed and non-tattooed specimens.ResultsHE and RT-LAMP analyses of 936 LNs were performed from 71 colectomies containing early carcinomas and endoscopically unresectable adenomas (8 pT0, 17 pTis, 27 pT1, 19 pT2); 47 out of 71 (66.2 %) were tattooed. Molecular positivity correlated with the presence of tattoo in LN [p < 0.001; OR 3.1 (95 % CI 1.7–5.5)]. A significantly higher number of LNs were obtained in tattooed specimens (median 17 LN vs. 14.5 LN; p = 0.019).ConclusionsEndoscopic tattooing enables the analysis of those LNs most prone to harbor tumor cells and improves the number of LN harvested.

Preoperative endoscopic tattooing to mark the tumour site does not improve lymph node retrieval in colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study.

BackgroundA direct correlation between number of lymph nodes retrieved and evaluated after a colectomy for colorectal cancer and survival of the patient has been reported, and consensus guidelines recommend to assess at least 12 lymph nodes for adequate staging. Many factors (i.e., patients’ and tumour characteristics, surgeon, and pathologist) may influence the evaluation of the presence of neoplastic disease in lymph nodes as well as the total number of lymph nodes examined. Preoperative endoscopic tattooing to mark the site of the tumour has recently been suggested to facilitate the retrieval of lymph nodes in colorectal specimens. The aim of this study was to investigate its association with adequate lymphadenectomy (≥12 nodes) after colorectal resection for cancer.ResultsAll patients undergoing elective colorectal resection for cancer between 2009 and 2011 at the S. Anna University Hospital in Ferrara, Italy (N = 250) were retrospectively divided into two cohorts according to whether ink tattooing to mark the tumour site was performed during preoperative colonoscopy. The two cohorts were comparable regarding age, gender, body mass index, tumour location and size, TNM staging, and DNA microsatellite instability-high status. No difference between the tattoo (N = 107) and control (N = 143) groups could be detected in the rate of adequate lymphadenectomies performed (78% vs. 79%, p = 0.40). All factors known to influence lymph nodes retrieval from colorectal specimen were specifically evaluated. Rectal and colonic cancers were analysed together and separately. Full adjusted logistic regression analysis in patients who underwent colonic resection showed that right hemicolectomy (OR 4.72; CI95% 1.09-20.36) was the only factor associated to adequate lymphadenectomy. No association between ink tattooing performed preoperatively to mark the site of the tumour and adequate lymphadenectomy after colorectal resection was found with logistic regression analysis.ConclusionThis study shows that preoperative ink tattooing utilized to mark the site of the tumour does not improve adequate lymphadenectomy and lymph nodes yield from colorectal cancer specimens. Further studies are therefore needed to determine if preoperative colonoscopic tattooing to mark the tumour site can refine staging.

Preoperative endoscopic tattooing of pancreatic body and tail lesions decreases operative time for laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy

Precise and expedient localization of small pancreatic tumors during laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy can be difficult owing to the decreased tactile ability of laparoscopy and the homogenous appearance of the surrounding retroperitoneal fat. Precise localization of the lesion is critical to achieving adequate margins of resection while preserving as much healthy pancreas as possible. The objective in this study was to determine the effect of endoscopic tattooing of the distal pancreas on operative time. We reviewed retrospectively 36 consecutive patients who had a laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy at our institution over a 4-year period (2006-2009). Ten patients underwent preoperative tattooing via an endoscopic transgastric technique using ultrasound guidance. The tattoo was performed using 2-4 cc of sterile purified carbon particles injected immediately proximal and anterior to the pancreatic lesion. Operative times were compared according to the presence of a tattoo. The endoscopically placed tattoo was easily visible upon entering the lesser sac in all 10 patients at laparoscopy. Patients with a tattoo had a shorter operative time (median, 128.5 minutes; range, 53-180) compared with patients without a tattoo (median, 180 minutes; range, 120-240; P < .01). None of the tattoo group required repeat surgery, whereas 1 patient who was not tattooed required re-resection for a lesion missed in the initial specimen. There were no complications associated with the endoscopic ultrasound-guided tattoo. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tattooing of pancreas lesions before a laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy is safe and is associated with decreased operative time compared with nontattooed patients. This technique can allow for quick and precise localization of the lesion, allowing for optimal preservation of pancreas parenchyma and demarcating an appropriate line of resection.

The Lymph Node Yield of Neck Dissections – Is There a Difference Between Consultant Surgeons and Specialist Registrars?

The Lymph Node Yield of Neck Dissections – Is There a Difference Between Consultant Surgeons and Specialist Registrars?

The Frequency and Accuracy of Pre-Operative Endoscopic Tattooing of Colorectal Lesions

The Frequency and Accuracy of Pre-Operative Endoscopic Tattooing of Colorectal Lesions

Black Macular Patches on Parietal Peritoneum and Other Extraintestinal Sites from Intraperitoneal Spillage and Spread of India Ink from Preoperative Endoscopic Tattooing: An Endoscopic, Surgical, Gross Pathologic, and Microscopic Study

Three cases, including one case report and two clinical images, have been reported of extraintestinal or peritoneal black maculae detected at laparoscopy after colonoscopic tattooing, presumably from intraperitoneal spillage of India ink during tattooing. Report three cases of inadvertent extraintestinal tattooing from endoscopic tattooing of intestinal lesions, provide histologic evidence for the presumed pathophysiology, and promulgate recommendations to prevent this complication. Three patients underwent endoscopic tattooing of intestinal lesions using India ink, surgery for lesion removal, and pathologic analysis. Three patients had black macular patches or streaks identified intraoperatively at extraintestinal sites after endoscopic tattooing of intestinal lesions with India ink: (1) black patches on peritoneum 7 days after colonoscopic tattooing of cecal cancer, (2) black streaks on band connecting cecum to peritoneum 13 days after colonoscopic tattooing of cecal cancer, and (3) blackish band on jejunal mesentery 28 days after tattooing presumptive bleeding jejunal lesion. Pigmentation was detected at both injection and extraintestinal sites in all patients by (1) surgery, (2) gross pathology, and (3) microscopic examination demonstrating intracellular black pigmentation within mesothelial cells and macrophages. Special histologic stains were consistent with a carbon-based pigment, and inconsistent with iron or melanin as the pigment. The proposed mechanism is intraperitoneal India ink spillage from deep intestinal injection, as supported by histologic findings of subserosal pigment accumulation. An alternative histologic mechanism is migration of pigment-laden macrophages via lymphovascular channels. Endoscopic injection of India ink using standard sclerotherapy needles can inadvertently tattoo extraintestinal sites in addition to tattooing the primary lesion. Despite its striking appearance, this intraoperative, gross, and microscopic finding is likely not pathologically significant, given its proposed pathophysiology. Surgical recognition of this entity is important, however, to prevent misinterpretation of findings as peritoneal melanoma, endometrial implants, infarcted mesentery, or tattooed cancer. This complication may be prevented by proper tattooing technique.

Endoscopy-assisted gastric resection: a safe and reliable procedure for tumor clearance during laparoscopic high distal or proximal gastrectomy

Preoperative endoscopic tattooing or clipping is generally used to delineate the tumor-free margin in surgery for early gastric cancer. However, it is sometimes difficult to identify the line of resection during laparoscopic gastrectomy. Between June 2003 and February 2008, we performed a total of 12 endoscopy-assisted gastric resections during laparoscopic gastrectomy for cancer, including four cases of high distal gastrectomy and eight cases of proximal gastrectomy. In the laparoscopic high distal gastrectomy cases, a surgeon performed transduodenal endoscopy to identify the clips before gastric resection. For totally laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy, an endoscopist performed transoral endoscopy to identify the clips placed in the distal margin of the lesion and to facilitate intracorporeal anastomosis. In all cases, we were able to observe clips as well as the primary lesion. Gastric resection was successfully performed with no positive margin. In the high distal gastrectomy group (n = 4), proximal and distal margins were 19.5 +/- 2.1 (range, 10-35) mm and 1,185 +/- 190.9 (range, 850-1,320) mm, respectively. In the proximal gastrectomy group (n = 8), proximal and distal margins were 21.3 +/- 7.1 (range, 5-38) mm and 47.5 +/- 3.5 (range, 15-75) mm, respectively. The intracorporeal side-to-side anastomosis during proximal gastrectomy was successfully performed using an endolinear stapler. Endoscopy-assisted gastric resection is a safe and reliable procedure for tumor clearance during laparoscopic high distal or proximal gastrectomy.