Preoperative Axillary Research Articles

Are Clinically Node-Negative Patients with a Positive Preoperative Axillary Lymph Node Biopsy Appropriate Candidates for Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy?

Whether cN0 patients with image-detected nodal metastases are appropriate for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) or should proceed directly to axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) or neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is controversial. We sought to determine how often ALND is needed with upfront surgery and to identify factors associated with ≥ 3 positive SLNs after a positive preoperative lymph node (LN) biopsy. Patients with cT1-2N0 breast cancer and a positive LN biopsy treated from 2014 to 2022 were identified from a prospective database. Patients who received NAC were excluded. Clinicopathologic characteristics were compared between women with 1-2 positive SLNs and ≥ 3 positive SLNs. Of 90 eligible patients, 66 (73%) had 1-2 positive SLNs and 24 (27%) had ≥ 3 positive SLNs. The median patient age was 62 years, median tumor size was 2.2 cm, and 16 women (18%) received a mastectomy. There was no difference in body mass index, tumor size, histology, grade, multifocality, presence of lymphovascular invasion, and receptor status between groups. On multivariable analysis, having ≥ 3 positive SLNs was associated with > 1 abnormal LN on preoperative imaging (odds ratio [OR] 4.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.47-14.0; p = 0.01), microscopic extracapsular extension in the SLNs (OR 3.83, 95% CI 1.25-13.7; p = 0.025), and a higher median number of SLNs removed (OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.10-1.88; p = 0.01). More than 70% of women with cT1-2 breast cancer with image-detected nodal metastases had < 3 positive SLNs and did not require ALND. To avoid multiple trips to the operating room, frozen section can be considered in women with multiple abnormal LNs on imaging.

Axilla View of Mammography in Preoperative Axillary Lymph Node Evaluation of Breast Cancer Patients: A Pilot Study

PurposeThis study aimed to explore a novel position of mammography named axilla view in axillary lymph node (ALN) evaluation in breast cancer. Patients and MethodsPatients were prospectively enrolled and scheduled for mammography before surgery. Investigated imaging patterns included mediolateral oblique (2D-MLO) and axilla view (2D-axilla) of mammography, and axilla view of digital breast tomosynthesis (3D-axilla). The correlation of ALN numbers between imaging and pathology was analyzed. Diagnostic performance was analyzed via AUC. Results75 patients were included. A larger and clearer axillary region was displayed in axilla view. The total number of ALNs detected under 2D/3D-axilla view was significantly higher than that under 2D-MLO view (4.6 vs. 2.5, P < .001; 5.6 vs. 4.6, P = .034). Correlations between number of positive ALNs detected under 2D/3D-axilla view and pathologically confirmed metastatic ALNs were stronger than 2D-MLO view (Pearson correlation coefficients: 0.7084,0.7044 and 0.4744). The proportion of cases with ≥5 positive ALNs detected under 3D-axilla view was significantly higher than that under 2D-MLO (38.2% vs. 14.7%, P = .028). The overweight and obese group showed a higher AUC value than the underweight and lean group in ALN evaluation, although not significantly (2D-MLO: 0.7643 vs. 0.6458, P = .2656; 2D-axilla: 0.8083 vs. 0.6586, P = .1522; 3D-axilla: 0.8045 vs. 0.6615, P = .1874). This difference was more pronounced in axilla view. ConclusionAxilla view exhibited advantages over conventional MLO view in the extent of axilla displayed by mammography in breast cancer. Further studies with larger sample sizes are needed.

89 (PB-089) Poster - Accuracy of pre-operative axillary US and biopsy in breast cancer patients

Background: Axillary lymph node status is an important factor in prognosis and treatment decision making of breast cancer. Ultrasound scan (US) is a useful tool in pre operative assessment axilla in patients with breast cancer and plays a pivotal role in the surgical management of axilla, sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) vs axillary lymph node clearance (ALNC). The sensitivity of pre operative axillary US varies widely among centres, however the standard for the identification of metastatic axillary lymph nodes on pre-operative ultrasound and biopsy is 40–50% as per NICE Guidelines.

Preoperative Axillary Ultrasound-guided Wire Localization and Lymphoscintigraphy for Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Breast Cancer Patients

Background: Breast cancer has the highest incidence and mortality among female malignant tumors. Breast cancer with negative axillary lymph nodes has been diag- nosed mainly at an early stage. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is a standard screening technique for patients with early-stage breast cancer and clinically nega- tive lymph nodes. Lymphoscintigraphy (sentinel lymph node mapping) has been reg- ularly used as the standard method for SLNB. Today, ultrasound-guided wire locali- zation (USGWL) is a well-established technique with superior outcomes. Therefore, we attempted to determine whether preoperative UGWL and lymphoscintigraphy (blue dye and isotope injection) improve SLN detection and false-negative rate in breast cancer patients undergoing SLNB and identify clinical factors that may affect the diagnostic accuracy of axillary ultrasound (AUS). Methods: Between December 2018 and June 2019, 55 patients with clinical T1- 3N0 breast cancer eligible for an SLNB at Imam Khomeini Hospital in Tehran were included in our study. Tumor characteristics and demographic data were collect- ed by reviewing medical records and questionnaires prepared by our surgical team. The day before SLNB, all patients underwent ultrasound-guided wire localization of SLN. Lymphoscintigraphy was performed with an unfiltered 99mTc-labelled sulfur colloid peritumoral injection followed by methylene blue dye injection. The results were analyzed based on the permanent pathology report. Results: Among the 55 patients, 71.8% of SLNs were detected by wire localization, while 57.8% were found by methylene blue mapping and 59.6% by gamma probe detection. Compared with wire localization and isotope injection, the methylene blue dye technique had a low sensitivity (72.2%), while both wire localization and isotope injection reached 77.8%. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of UGWL were 77.8%, 42.1%, and 65.4%, respectively. Otherwise, methylene blue dye and isotope injection accuracy was 47.3% and 50.1%, respectively. Furthermore, there was a significant relationship between BMI, tumor size, laterality, reactive ALN, and the accuracy of preoperative AUS. But there was no significant correlation between age, weight, height, tumor biopsy, tumor location, the time interval between methylene blue dye and isotope injection to surgery, and also the type of surgery to the accuracy of preoperative AUS. Conclusion: Preoperative UGWL can effectively identify SLNs compared to lym- phoscintigraphy (blue dye and isotope injection) in early breast cancer patients un- dergoing SLNB.

Accuracy of Preoperative Ultrasound-Guided Axillary Lymph Node Core Needle Biopsy to Predict Axillary Lymph Node Involvement in Breast Cancer

Background: Breast cancer operative management consists of breast surgery and axillary lymph node (ALN) assessment. ALN status is an important prognostic factor and determinant of breast cancer treatment. Objective: To investigate preoperative ultrasound-guided axillary lymph node core needle biopsy (USACNB) accuracy in predicting ALN involvement for breast cancer. Materials and Methods: This retrospective cohort study took place between February 2014 and May 2019. One hundred nine consecutive operable breast cancer patients with suspicious ALN involvement were assessed using preoperative USACNB and subsequent breast cancer surgery. Exclusion criteria were insufficient ALN tissue from USACNB for interpretation, previous breast or axillary surgery on the same side. Patients with preoperative histopathology results proving of metastasis underwent ALN dissection (ALND) while those with negative results had sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). When SLNB was positive, ALND was then performed. Preoperative USACNB accuracy was analyzed using SLNB or ALND pathological results as standard tests. Results: The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of preoperative USACNB in evaluating ALN involvement was 87.5%, 100%, 100%, and 80.4%, respectively, with an accuracy of 91.7%. Conclusion: Preoperative USACNB shows high diagnostic accuracy in ALN metastasis, but its NPV remains too low to completely rule out ALN involvement. Standard SLNB is still necessary in cases of negative USACNB. Keywords: Breast cancer; Ultrasound guided core needle biopsy; Axillary lymph node

Impact of BMI on Preoperative Axillary Ultrasound Assessment in Patients With Early Breast Cancer.

The accuracy of axillary ultrasound (AUS) with fine-needle aspiration with varying patient body mass index (BMI) is still unclear. The aim of our study was to evaluate whether the US features of axillary lymph nodes changes with BMI of patients. A retrospective review was performed involving 144 out of 270 patients with early breast cancer who underwent breast surgery with sentinel lymph node biopsy. Diagnostic efficacy of AUS in preoperative axillary nodal staging was assessed in relation to BMI. Negative predictive values of AUS for the overweight and obese groups were statistically significantly lower compared to the normal/underweight group (p=0.02 and p=0.003, respectively). Additionally, Spearman's correlation coefficient R between BMI and positive sentinel lymph node biopsy was 0.257, suggesting a significantly positive linear relationship between the two variables in the cohort overall. Our results demonstrate how in our cohort the negative predictive value of AUS was significantly influenced by adipose tissue and that the selection of the most suitable instrumental diagnostic technique might contribute to improving heterogeneous results.

Preoperative Axillary Ultrasound Helps in the Identification of a Limited Nodal Burden in Breast Cancer Patients.

Since the Z0011 trial, the clinical evaluation of axillary status has been redirected to predicting nodal tumor burden rather than nodal metastases. Our study aimed to evaluate the value of clinicopathological factors and axillary ultrasound (US) for the prediction of a high nodal burden (≥3 metastatic lymph nodes) in breast cancer patients. A total of 532 consecutive patients who underwent preoperative axillary US and subsequent surgery for clinical T1-2 breast cancer with a final pathologic analysis were included. Clinical and pathologic variables were retrospectively evaluated. Univariate and multivariate statistical analyses were performed to identify the variables that were associated with a high nodal burden. Among the 532 patients, 110 (20.7%) had a high axillary nodal burden and 422 (79.3%) had a limited nodal burden. The multivariate analysis showed that suspicious axillary US findings (P < 0.001), clinical T2 stage (P = 0.011), the presence of lymphovascular invasion (P < 0.001), and estrogen receptor positivity (P < 0.001) were significantly associated with a high nodal burden. Patients with negative axillary US findings seldom had a high nodal burden, with a negative predictive value of 93.0% (294/316). Patients with suspicious axillary US findings, clinical T2 stage, lymphovascular invasion, and estrogen receptor positivity are more likely to have a high nodal burden, which may provide additional information for the treatment plan of breast cancer patients. Preoperative axillary US helps identify a limited nodal burden in breast cancer patients and has implications for axillary lymph node dissection and adjuvant treatment.

The Accuracy of Preoperative Axillary Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Lymph Node Involvement at Motamed Cancer Institute, Iran

Background: Axillary lymph node (LN) status plays an important role in the local and systemic treatment of patients with breast cancer. Preoperative axillary ultrasound (AUS) is routinely used for the evaluation of axillary lymph nodes as a non-invasive method. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of axillary ultrasound in comparison with pathology in a referral breast center. Methods: During a cross-sectional study all patients with breast cancer presenting to the imaging department between September 2015 and August 2016 were evaluated for axillary lymph node status by ultrasound. After comparing these results with the pathology of LNs, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the ultrasound in the diagnosis of axillary lymph node involvement were measured. Results: Overall 140 patients were enrolled in the study. The mean age of patients was 48.87 (± 10.46) years with an age range between 25 - 81 years. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the ultrasound were reported as 56%, 88%, and 76%, respectively. The highest sensitivity rate was related to AUS + Physical examination (PE) with 70%. The best specificity was for AUS, about 88%, and the accuracy of AUS+PE was the highest about 80%. Conclusions: The sensitivity of the AUS in the diagnosis of axillary involvement in the Motamed Cancer Institute was moderate and the specificity was good. The combination of physical examination and ultrasound could improve the sensitivity in comparison to each one alone. If both are suspicious, axillary dissection could be considered when fine needle aspiration (FNA) or core needle biopsy (CNB) of the lymph node is not available.

Preoperative Axillary Ultrasound versus Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Patients with Early Breast Cancer.

Background and objectives: With improved diagnostic means of early breast cancer, the percentage of cases with metastasis in axillary lymph nodes has decreased from 50–75% to 15–30%. Lymphadenectomy and sentinel lymph node biopsy are not treatment procedures, as they aim at axillary nodal staging in breast cancer. Being surgical interventions, they can lead to various complications. Therefore, recently much attention has been paid to the identification of non-invasive methods for axillary nodal staging. In many countries, ultrasound is a first-line method to evaluate axillary lymph node status. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of ultrasound in detecting intact axillary lymph nodes and to assess the accuracy of ultrasound in detecting a heavy nodal disease burden. The additional objective was to evaluate patients’ and tumor characteristics leading to false-negative results. Materials and Methods: A total of 227 women with newly diagnosed pT1 breast cancer were included to this prospective study conducted at the Breast Surgery Unit, Clinic of Surgery, Hospital of Lithuanian University of Health Sciences Kauno Klinikos, between May 1, 2016, and May 31, 2018. All patients underwent preoperative axillary ultrasound examination. Ultrasound data were compared with the results of histological examination. The accuracy and true-negative rate of ultrasound were calculated. The reasons of false-negative results were analyzed. Results: Of the 189 patients who had normally appearing axillary lymph nodes on preoperative ultrasound (PAUS-negative), 173 (91.5%) patients were also confirmed to have intact axillary lymph nodes (node-negative) by histological examination after surgery. The accuracy and the negative predictive value of ultrasound examination were 84.1% and 91.5%, respectively. In ≥3 node-positive cases, the accuracy and the negative predictive value increased to 88.7% and 98.3%, respectively. In total, false-negative results were found in 8.5% of the cases (n = 16); in the PAUS-negative group, false-negative results were recorded only in 1.6% of the cases (n = 3). The results of PAUS and pathological examination differed significantly between patients without and with lymphovascular invasion (LV0 vs. LV1, p < 0.001) as well as those showing no human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression and patients with weakly or strongly expressed HER2 (HER2(0) vs. HER2(1), p = 0.024). Paired comparisons revealed that the true-negative rate was significantly different between the LV0 and LV1 groups (91% vs. 66.7%, p < 0.05), and the false-negative rate was statistically significant different between the HER2(0) and HER2(1) groups (10.5% vs. 1.2%, p < 0.05). Evaluation of other characteristics showed both the groups to be homogenous. Conclusions: Negative axillary ultrasound excluded axillary metastatic disease in 91.5% of the patients. PAUS had an accuracy of 88.7% in detecting a heavy nodal disease burden. With the absence of lymphovascular invasion (LV0), we can rely on PAUS examination that axillary lymph nodes are intact (PAUS-negative), and this patients’ group could avoid sentinel lymph node biopsy. Patients without HER2 expression are at a greater likelihood of false-negative results; therefore, the findings of ultrasound that axillary lymph nodes are intact (PAUS-negative results) should be interpreted with caution.

Abstract P4-02-11: Can preoperative axillary staging replace sentinel node biopsy? Comparison of preoperative axillary and final histologic nodal findings in 2108 patients with primary breast cancer

Abstract Background Axillary staging is an integral part of the preoperative work-up in patients with breast cancer. Given the increasing number of patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NC) and current guidelines to perform sentinel-node biopsy after the completion of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, axillary staging has gained more importance. Beside the prediction of nodal involvement, correct prediction of nodal stage is crucial in order to select respective treatment for the patients. Materials and Methods Patients treated for primary breast cancer from 01/2013 to 01/2018 and received preoperative sonografic axillary staging and surgery were identified from the breast databases of two large volume hospitals. In case of sonografic suspicion of nodal involvement an axillary biopsy was performed. Accuracy of axillary staging was examined regarding the concordance between prediction of nodal involvement and nodal (N) stage with final pathology. A multivariate model was used to identify factors associated with a high accuracy of axillary sonografic staging. Results Among 2220 patients, 112 were excluded due to incomplete clinical data or axillary surgery after completion of neoadjuvant chemotherapy leaving 2108 patients for final analysis. 1535 (73 %) showed a N0 stage on final pathology. Accuracy of axillary staging regarding prediction of nodal involvement was 92 % (1929/2108) with a sensitivity of 80 % and a specificity of 96 %, a positive predictive value of 88 % and a negative predictive of 93 %. Prediction of nodal stage was correct in 1894 of 2018 cases (90 %). Concordance between sonografic prediction of N stage and final pathology decreased with higher nodal stages (N0 - 91 %, N1 84 %, N2 81 %, N3 68 %) and was higher in node negative patients (91 %) compared to node positive patients (86 %; p ≤ 0.05). On multivariate analysis the presence of nodal involvement was the only factor associated with concordance of axillary staging and pathologic nodal stage (OR 0.11 (95 %CI 0.08 - 0.16) p ≤ 0.01). Conclusion In this large population of patients with primary breast cancer, we showed a high accuracy of preoperative axillary staging with respect to nodal involvement and prediction of respective N stage. With a negative predictive value of 93 % regarding node negativity, axillary staging showed accurate outcomes but improvements in sensitivity are necessary in oder to compete with sentinel node biopsy. Citation Format: Julia Caroline Radosa, Martin Deeken, Lisa Stotz, Sarah Huwer, Carolin Müller, Rosemarie Weinmann, Christoph G Radosa, Marc P Radosa, Stefan Wagenpfeil, Erich-Franz Solomayer. Can preoperative axillary staging replace sentinel node biopsy? Comparison of preoperative axillary and final histologic nodal findings in 2108 patients with primary breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-02-11.

Correlation of Preoperative Axillary Lymph Node Status to Final Histology After Axillary Surgery for Breast Cancer

Correlation of Preoperative Axillary Lymph Node Status to Final Histology After Axillary Surgery for Breast Cancer

Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology and Ultrasound-Guided Core Biopsy in Preoperative Axillary Staging for Early Breast Cancer

Current national guidance supports the use of either ultrasound-guided core biopsy (USCB) or ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology (USFNAC) to detect preoperatively axillary lymph node involvement in early breast cancer but does not support one over the other. To compare the accuracy of USFNAC to USCB in diagnosing axillary lymph node metastasis in early-stage breast cancer in our symptomatic breast care unit. Historical case series data for patients from November 2007 to May 2012 was analysed. Our study included newly diagnosed, symptomatic, clinically node-negative breast cancers. Women with screen-detected breast cancer, those who had breast staging by magnetic resonance imaging, those unfit for surgery and those with locally advanced cancers were excluded. GE Logic E9 and Philips ultrasound machines were used for the study. A total of 1213 axillary ultrasound scans were performed during the period of the study. Four hundred eighty-eight women were eligible for the study with a mean age of 57.8 years. Eighty-three (17%) had USFNAC, 116 (23.7%) had USCB and 289 (59.2%) had normal/benign US features. The sensitivity and specificity of USFNAC were 58% and 100%, respectively. For USCB, sensitivity and specificity were 82% and 100%, respectively, and for US alone, sensitivity and specificity were 50% and 77%, respectively. We support the routine use of USCB over USFNAC for women who have breast cancer with indeterminate or suspicious axillary involvement on ultrasound, due to its greater accuracy.

Can We Identify or Exclude Extensive Axillary Nodal Involvement in Breast Cancer Patients Preoperatively?

Background Breast cancer treatment has rapidly changed in the last few years. Particularly, treatment of patients with axillary nodal involvement has evolved after publication of several randomized clinical trials. Omitting axillary lymph node dissection in selected early breast cancer patients with one or two positive sentinel nodes did not compromise overall survival nor regional disease control in these trials. Hence, either excluding or identifying extensive axillary nodal involvement becomes increasingly important. Purpose To evaluate whether the current diagnostic modalities can accurately identify or exclude extensive axillary nodal involvement. Evaluated modalities were axillary ultrasound, ultrasound-guided needle biopsy, MRI, and PET/CT. Methods A literature search was performed in the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and PubMed databases up to June 2019. The search strategy included terms for breast cancer, lymph nodes, and the different imaging modalities. Only articles that reported pathological N-stage or the total number of positive axillary lymph nodes were considered for inclusion. Studies with patients undergoing neoadjuvant systemic therapy were excluded. Conclusion There is no evidence that any of the current preoperative axillary imaging modalities can accurately exclude or identify breast cancer patients with extensive nodal involvement. Both negative PET/CT and negative MRI scans (with gadolinium-based contrast agents) are promising in excluding extensive nodal involvement. Larger studies should be performed to strengthen this conclusion. False-negative rates of axillary ultrasound and ultrasound-guided needle biopsy are too high to rely on negative results of these modalities in excluding extensive nodal involvement.

The Accuracy of the Preoperative Axillary Ultrasound Examination in Predicting the Status of the Sentinel Lymph Node Involvement in Patients with Infiltrating Breast Carcinoma.

Background: we aimed to determine the accuracy of preoperative axillary ultrasound (US) in predicting the presence of sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis in breast cancer patients. Methods and Results: out of 54 cases, visible nodes on US were identified in 35 cases of which, 15 had metastasis. In 19 cases no axillary lymph nodes were visible on US. Of these, only 3 had metastasis. Moreover, our results demonstrated that neither the maximum diameter (p=0.738 Fisher exact test) nor the ratio between the longitudinal and transverse axes (p=0.728 Fisher exact test) can predict the positivity of the SLN. Conclusion: US cannot predict the positivity of the SLN.

Preoperative Axillary US in Early-Stage Breast Cancer: Potential to Prevent Unnecessary Axillary Lymph Node Dissection.

Purpose To evaluate the value of preoperative axillary ultrasonography (US) for preventing unnecessary axillary lymph node dissection after sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy in a large series of patients with early-stage breast cancers treated with both breast-conserving surgery and SLN biopsy. Materials and Methods From March 2009 to February 2013, 1802 patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery for clinical T1-2/N0 cancers and SLN biopsy with or without axillary lymph node dissection were included. Preoperative axillary US results and clinical-pathologic variables were compared according to the status of non-SLN metastasis. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to find factors associated with non-SLN metastasis. Results Of 1802 patients, 397 (22.0%) underwent axillary lymph node dissection due to positive SLN biopsy and 76 (4.2%) had non-SLN metastasis at final histopathologic examination. Patients with non-SLN metastasis were younger and showed positive axilla at US and clinical T2 stage more frequently (P < .05). At multivariate analysis, positive axilla at US (P = .001), clinical T2 stage (P = .005), and lymphovascular invasion (P < .001) were significantly associated with non-SLN metastasis. Among 1284 patients with negative axilla at US and clinical T1 stage cancer, 1254 (97.7%) did not have non-SLN metastasis and 30 (2.3%) had non-SLN metastasis. Conclusion Preoperative axillary US results and clinical T stage are associated with the status of non-SLN metastasis in patients with early breast cancer. The results of this study suggest that preoperative axillary US can help select patients at minimal risk of non-SLN metastasis, for whom axillary lymph node dissection can be omitted. © RSNA, 2018 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Preoperative Axillary Ultrasound in the Selection of Patients With a Heavy Axillary Tumor Burden in Early-Stage Breast Cancer: What Leads to False-Positive Results?

To determine whether imaging and clinicopathologic features could predict false-positive axillary ultrasound (US) results in the selection of patients with breast cancer who had a heavy axillary tumor burden (≥3 tumor-involved nodes). Among 788 patients with histologically confirmed invasive breast cancer at Ruijin Hospital from October 2014 to September 2015, 162 patients (cT1-T2, cN0) with 167 axillae had suspicious axillary US findings. Ultrasound findings were considered suspicious for metastasis if cortical thickening of greater than 3 mm or effacement of the fatty hilum was present. The false-positive rate of suspicious axillary US results for identifying 3 or more positive lymph nodes in the final pathologic examination was calculated. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to evaluate imaging and clinicopathologic factors related to the false-positive results. Axillary US showed a false-positive rate of 60.5% (101 of 167) in the patients with breast cancer and a heavy nodal burden. By logistic regression analyses, we found false-positive axillary US results more frequently in patients who had a T1 stage tumor (P = .005), an estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor-negative tumor (P < .001), solitary suspicious nodes identified on axillary US (P < .001), and a cortical thickness of the most suspicious lymph node of 3.5 mm or less (P = .015). Imaging and clinicopathologic features can be used to identify axillae with less than 3 metastatic nodes in patients with early-stage breast cancer who have positive axillary US results. In the post-American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 trial era, conducting a secondary evaluation either clinically or by axillary imaging before the use of a US-guided biopsy of suspicious nodes can potentially avoid the additional morbidity of axillary lymph node dissection and reduce the preoperative workload.

Preoperative Axillary Lymph Node Marking in Patients with Breast Cancer

Axillary dissection (AD) is an integral part of the surgical staging of breast cancer. This operation can be source of major long term complications, e. g., lymphedema. Reducing the radicality of these operations has been the subject of many clinical trials, especially those addressing the metastatic infiltration of axillary lymph nodes uncovered either by clinical staging or by sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy (when the clinical staging was negative). Exact clinical (mainly ultrasonographic) staging and marking of the lymph nodes detected by staging plays a key role in deciding the optimum clinical regimen. Three possibilities were tested in clinical trials: The possibility of replacing the AD by radiotherapy in the case of tumorous infiltration of SLN, when clinical staging was negative; the possibility of omitting AD (in patients with positive clinical axillary staging) and replacing it with SLN biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy; and the possibility of marking lymph nodes in axilla that were suspected of infiltration at the time of clinical staging. The studies showed clear evidence that avoiding AD was safe in oncology patients who showed infiltration of axillary SLN and negative clinical staging. Despite the high false negativity of using SLN biopsies in patients with a positive clinical staging after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, this false negativity could be reduced by using lymph node marking. By implementing these methods, it should be possible to define exactly the group of patients in whom complete pathological remission occurs after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.Key words: breast neoplasms - axilla - lymph nodes The authors declare they have no potential conflicts of interest concerning drugs, products, or services used in the study. The Editorial Board declares that the manuscript met the ICMJE recommendation for biomedical papers.Submitted: 17. 4. 2017Accepted: 2. 7. 2017.

Pre-operative Axillary Ultrasound-Guided Needle Sampling in Breast Cancer: Comparing the Sensitivity of Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology and Core Needle Biopsy

Pre-operative ultrasound-guided needle sampling (UNS) of abnormal axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer can identify patients with axillary metastases and therefore rationalize patient care and inform decision-making. To obtain tissue diagnosis, UNS can be performed by either fine needle aspiration (FNA) or core needle biopsy (CNB). However, few studies have compared the sensitivity of these techniques and the majority show no difference. All node-positive patients (those with micro- and macrometastases but not isolated tumor cells) treated at a tertiary referral center between January 2012 and December 2015 were retrospectively identified from pathology records. The result of the first axillary UNS performed on each patient was compared with postoperative histopathology results. The UNS method used was according to individual radiologist preference. A total of 215 patients underwent FNA (1 patient had bilateral breast cancer and underwent bilateral FNA), and 92 underwent CNB. Sensitivity of CNB was significantly higher than FNA (83.7 vs. 69.0%, P=0.008). The false-negative rate in the FNA group was therefore higher than in the CNB group by a factor of 2.5. There was no difference in inadequacy rate between the two techniques. There were no complications in the FNA group, and only one hematoma (which did not require operative intervention) in the CNB group. CNB is safe and should be the preferred technique for UNS to improve sensitivity.

Feasibility of Preoperative Axillary Lymph Node Marking with a Clip in Breast Cancer Patients Before Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Preliminary Study

The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility of image-guided marker-clip placement in axillary lymph nodes (ALNs) for breast cancer upon initial presentation and to assess the reliability of this method with sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for axillary restaging after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Between June 2015 and August 2016, a marker clip was placed at a clinically positive ALN under ultrasonography (US) guidance before initiation of NAC in 20 patients. Preoperative localization of marker-clipped LNs was performed, and the localized LNs were removed by SLNB. We compared the postoperative results of the marker-clipped LNs, SLNs and ALNs. Image-guided marker-clip placements and localization of marker-clipped LNs were performed successfully in 20 patients. A total of 24 marker clips were inserted, and 23 marker-clipped LNs were successfully retrieved during surgery (identification rate, 23/24, 95.8%). In the 11 patients with pathologically confirmed metastatic marker-clipped LNs, four became negative after NAC, and seven maintained metastatic residues on the marker-clipped LNs. Three of the seven patients had metastatic residues on the ALNs, and two of the three patients also had negative SLNs. Marker-clipped nodes accurately predicted the axillary nodal status in these two patients compared with SLNs alone. Image-guided marker-clip placement on positive ALNs before NAC and removal with SLNB is technically feasible. This technique can improve the accuracy of the residual disease evaluation on the axilla, especially in patients with negative SLNB results, and can identify candidates for limited axillary surgery after NAC.

(P007) Treatment Changes Associated With Pre-Operative Axillary Ultrasound on Breast Cancer

(P007) Treatment Changes Associated With Pre-Operative Axillary Ultrasound on Breast Cancer