Prenatal Care Delivery Research Articles

Balancing the scales? Evaluating the impact of results-based financing on maternal health outcomes and related inequality of opportunity in Zimbabwe

This study evaluates the impact of results-based financing (RBF) on maternal health outcomes and the inequality of opportunity (IOP) in these outcomes in Zimbabwe. We employ a difference-in-differences approach that leverages the staggered implementation of the programme across 60 districts, exploiting temporal variation in the introduction of RBF and individual-level variation in birth timing. Our analysis uses nationally representative, pooled cross-sectional data from the 2005/2006, 2010/2011, and 2015 Zimbabwe demographic and health surveys. Employing the extended two-way fixed effects (ETWFE) estimator to address biases associated with staggered rollouts, we find significant positive effects of RBF on maternal health outcomes. The programme is associated with an increase in the number of prenatal care visits by 0.185 units (p < 0.01), first-trimester care by 7.7 percentage points (pp) (p < 0.01), facility births by 8.6 pp (p < 0.01), and professional delivery assistance by 3.4 pp (p < 0.01), while reducing C-section rates by 1.3 pp (p < 0.01). Additionally, RBF is associated with reductions in IOP in prenatal care visits, early prenatal care, facility births, and professional delivery assistance by 3.8, 1.3, 8.4, and 4.9 pp (p < 0.01), respectively. These findings underscore the potential of RBF to enhance maternal health outcomes and promote health equity. Integrating equity considerations into health system strengthening initiatives is essential. Policymakers should ensure that health interventions improve access and balance opportunities across various socio-economic and demographic groups. This evidence suggests that RBF schemes can improve access to and equity in healthcare services, particularly in low-income settings such as Zimbabwe.

The Impact of Telehealth on Obstetrical Outcomes during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Nationwide, obstetric clinics modified prenatal care to include telehealth visits in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, enabling the opportunity to investigate its impact on patient outcomes. We hypothesized that use of prenatal telehealth visits would increase the number of prenatal visits, decrease the frequency of urgent triage/emergency department (ED) visits, and improve perinatal outcomes. To determine the impact of telehealth on number of obstetric prenatal visits and urgent triage/ED visits amidst the COVID-19 pandemic. This is a retrospective cohort of patients from a federally qualified health center (FQHC) in central Texas. Patients with a singleton gestation who delivered after 32 weeks were included. Comparison groups were made between those patients who delivered between May 2020 to December 2020 (presumed modified prenatal visit schedule with in-person and telehealth) and those patients delivering between June 2019 to February 2020 (the traditional care model with in-person visits only). Multivariable linear and logistic regression models were used to estimate differences in the number of prenatal visits and unscheduled triage/ED visits. A total of 1654 patients were identified with 801 (48.4%) patients undergoing modified prenatal care and 853 (51.6%) patients receiving traditional care during the study period. No significant differences were seen in overall prenatal attendance or triage/ED presentations. However, when stratified by parity, multiparous patients undergoing modified prenatal care were less likely to experience an urgent triage/ED presentation (8.7% vs. 12.7%; odds ratio, 1.69; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-2.61). When compared to a traditional prenatal visitation cohort pre-pandemic, patients who received modified telehealth prenatal care during the COVID-19 pandemic had similar prenatal attendance and unscheduled emergency presentations. However, multiparous patients experienced a decreased rate of unscheduled emergency presentations. Supplementing prenatal care with telehealth may provide overall comparable prenatal care delivery.

‘It’s not me, it’s them’ – a report describing the weight-related attitudes towards obesity in pregnancy among maternal healthcare providers

BackgroundOccurrences of weight stigma have been documented in prenatal clinical settings from the perspective of pregnant patients, however little is known from the viewpoint of healthcare providers themselves. Reported experiences of weight stigma caused by maternal healthcare providers may be due to negative attitudes towards obesity in pregnancy and a lack of obesity specific education. The objective of this study was to assess weight-related attitudes and assumptions towards obesity in pregnancy among maternal healthcare providers in order to inform future interventions to mitigate weight stigma in prenatal clinical settings.MethodsA cross-sectional survey was administered online for maternal healthcare providers in Canada that assessed weight-related attitudes and assumptions towards lifestyle behaviours in pregnancy for patients who have obesity. Participants indicated their level of agreement on a 5-point likert scale, and mean scores were calculated with higher scores indicating poorer attitudes. Participants reported whether they had observed weight stigma occur in clinical settings. Finally, participants were asked whether or not they had received obesity-specific training, and attitude scores were compared between the two groups.ResultsSeventy-two maternal healthcare providers (midwives, OBGYNs, residents, perinatal nurses, and family physicians) completed the survey, and 79.2% indicated that they had observed pregnant patients with obesity experience weight stigma in a clinical setting. Those who had obesity training perceived that their peers had poorer attitudes (3.7 ± 0.9) than those without training (3.1 ± 0.7; t(70) = 2.23, p = 0.029, Cohen’s d = 0.86).ConclusionsWeight stigma occurs in prenatal clinical environments, and this was confirmed by maternal healthcare providers themselves. These findings support advocacy efforts to integrate weight stigma related content and mitigation strategies in medical education for health professionals, including maternal healthcare providers. Future work should include prospective examination of weight related attitudes among maternal healthcare providers and implications of obesity specific education, including strategies on mitigating weight stigma in the delivery of prenatal care.

Geospatial Distribution of Prenatally and Postnatally Diagnosed Congenital Heart Disease: Implications for Equitable Care from a Fetal Heart Society Research Collaborative Study

To characterize patterns in the geospatial distribution of pre- and postnatally diagnosed congenital heart disease (CHD) across 6 surgical centers. A retrospective, multicenter case series from the Fetal Heart Society identified patients at 6 centers from 2012 through 2016 with prenatally (PrND) or postnatally (PoND) diagnosed hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS) or d-transposition of the great arteries (TGA). Geospatial analysis for clustering was done by the average nearest neighbor (ANN) tool or optimized hot spot tool, depending on spatial unit and data type. Both point location and county case rate per 10 000 live births were assessed for geographic clustering or dispersion. Of the 453 CHD cases, 26% were PoND (n=117), and 74% were PrND (n=336). PrND cases, in all but one center, displayed significant geographic clustering by the ANN. Conversely, PoND cases tended toward geographic dispersion. Dispersion of PoND HLHS occurred in 2 centers (ANN=1.59, P<.001; and 1.47, P=.016), and PoND TGA occurred in 2 centers (ANN=1.22, P<.05; and ANN=1.73, P<.001). Hot spot analysis of all CHD cases (TGA and HLHS combined) revealed clustering near areas of high population density and the tertiary surgical center. Hot spot analysis of county-level case rate, accounting for population density, found variable clustering patterns. Geographic dispersion among postnatally detected CHD highlights the need for a wider reach of prenatal cardiac diagnosis tailored to the specific needs of a community. Geospatial analysis can support centers in improving the equitable delivery of prenatal care.

Stakeholder Perspectives of the PATH (Plan for Appropriate Tailored Healthcare in Pregnancy) Targeted Visit Schedule Recommendation [ID 2683601

INTRODUCTION: Traditional prenatal care delivery guidelines recommend 12–14 in-person visits for all patients, although care can be safely delivered to average-risk patients with 8–9 targeted visits. These additional visits may result in oversurveillance and unnecessary interventions. The Plan for Appropriate Tailored Healthcare in Pregnancy (PATH), a consensus-based prenatal care recommendation developed by a multidisciplinary team of prenatal care experts, recommends tailoring care delivery to patients' needs by using targeted visit schedules for average-risk patients. A national listening tour was conducted to obtain stakeholder feedback for incorporating this care delivery model into practice. METHODS: We conducted nine, 120-minute virtual focus groups with more than 25 organizations including professional (8), patient advocacy (8), public health (5), and payer groups (4). Focus groups were transcribed and coded by recommendation, and analyzed with matrix coding across positive attitudes, negative attitudes, and implementation considerations. RESULTS: Focus groups included 110 participants. Positive attitudes included the belief that targeted visit schedules would improve visit attendance, care flexibility, and resource equity. Negative attitudes included concerns for inappropriate targeted visit schedule application, inadequate safety net systems for missed services, and reduced payer reimbursement. Providers were also concerned about decreased opportunities for relationship building and counseling in targeted visit schedules. Implementation considerations included the importance of shared decision-making, serial needs assessments, and clear risk stratification guidelines. Participants emphasized the need for multidisciplinary safety net processes to ensure timely, adequate care. CONCLUSION: Participants were receptive to incorporating targeted visit schedules for average-risk individuals into routine prenatal care. Greater infrastructure investment is needed to implement more flexible care models successfully.

Stakeholder Perspectives of PATH (Plan for Appropriate Tailored Healthcare in Pregnancy) Telemedicine Recommendations [ID 2683565

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic has propelled innovation in prenatal care delivery including use of telemedicine for routine prenatal visits. The Plan for Appropriate Tailored Healthcare in Pregnancy (PATH), a consensus-based prenatal care recommendation developed by a multidisciplinary panel of prenatal care experts, includes two recommendations regarding telemedicine: 1) telemedicine should be an option for all visits aside from four key in-person contacts requiring in-person visits; and 2) home monitoring is an appropriate option for most routine parameters during pregnancy. A national listening tour was conducted to elicit stakeholder feedback for incorporating telemedicine recommendations into practice. METHODS: We conducted nine, 120-minute virtual focus groups with more than 25 organizations including professional (8), patient advocacy (8), public health (5), and payer groups (4). Focus groups were transcribed, coded by recommendation. Data were next analyzed with matrix coding across positive attitudes, negative attitudes, and implementation considerations. RESULTS: Focus groups included 110 participants. Most participants supported telemedicine use as a care modality for routine prenatal care. Positive attitudes included the belief that telemedicine increased care flexibility, care access, and patients' health agency. Negative attitudes included concerns that poor digital literacy, insufficient access to devices, and high cost could perpetuate existing health disparities. Implementation considerations included the importance of relationship building with patients, technical support staff use, home monitoring device validation, and patient education on telehealth best practices. Participants also emphasized needed improvements to telehealth infrastructure and funding. CONCLUSION: Interprofessional stakeholders broadly support telemedicine use in routine prenatal care. Improvements in existing advocacy efforts, research, and infrastructure in underserved communities are needed to facilitate increased access to telemedicine.

Understanding the Awareness of Prenatal Genetic Screening Tests Among Pregnant Women in India: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Introduction Genetic disorders pose a significant health challenge in India, with chromosomal abnormalities ranking second only to congenital anomalies in terms of disease burden. Prenatal testing offers a crucial strategy for identifying and managing these disorders. However, the awareness and understanding of prenatal screening tests among pregnant women in India remain understudied. This study aims to fill this gap by investigating the awareness quotient of prenatal screening tests for genetic disorders among pregnant women in India. Methods A hospital-based cross-sectional study was conducted at the Genetics Unit, Department of Anatomy, and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Mangalagiri. Ethical clearance was obtained, and data were collected using a self-administered questionnaire covering demographic characteristics and awareness assessment. Descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and logistic regression analysis were employed for data analysis. Results Among the 200 pregnant women surveyed, the majority demonstrated inadequate awareness of prenatal screening tests for genetic disorders, with only 36.5% possessing adequate knowledge. Significant associations were found between awareness levels and factors such as age, trimester of pregnancy, and education level. Notably, awareness about non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) was notably low at 7%, indicating a need for targeted educational interventions. Comparison with international studies revealed varying levels of awareness across different populations, highlighting the influence of socio-cultural factors and healthcare systems. Conclusion This study underscores the need for improved awareness of prenatal screening tests among pregnant women in India. Addressing disparities in awareness, particularly among younger age groups and those with lower education levels, is crucial for informed decision-making in prenatal care. Targeted educational interventions can empower pregnant women to make informed choices, ultimately contributing to better maternal and child health outcomes. Further research should explore the effectiveness of such interventions in diverse settings to enhance prenatal care delivery.

“Beautiful Registrations”: Metrics and Prenatal Care in Rural Bahia, Brazil

ABSTRACT In Brazil, lack of quality in the delivery of prenatal care is a persistent concern. In this study, I analyze the dynamics taking place in the prenatal clinical encounter, and illuminate how the requirement to produce metrics through registration and monitoring endorses a form of bureaucratic care. This form of care develops in a context characterized by scarcity and a lack of medical resources, where healthcare professionals attempt to contain uncertainty. Ruled by notions of risk, centered in measuring practices, and saturated by an overvaluation of technology, bureaucratic care reinforces the disenfranchizement and stigmatization of Black rural women.

Implementing a clinical checklist for pregnant patients with opioid use disorder.

Opioid use disorder (OUD) has been increasing in pregnant patients over the past two decades. Best practice guidelines that are available for these patients, must now be implemented by health care teams. Clinical checklists have been used for other complex patient cohorts with good success and are a potentially viable tool for ensuring best practices with this patient population as well. Maine has seen a dramatic increase in the number of pregnant patients with OUD. Many of these patients seemed to "fall through the cracks" in the traditional prenatal care model. The obstetrical care team expressed feeling overwhelmed by the complex care needs of these patients and unsure of how to improve their care. To improve prenatal care delivery for patients with OUD, we implemented an evidence-based clinical checklist. This local, NP-led quality improvement project was done in partnership with a state-led initiative to improve perinatal care for patients with OUD. An evidence-based checklist provided by the state initiative was implemented for prenatal patients with diagnosed OUD. Use of a clinical checklist for patients with OUD increased the rate of several best practices during their prenatal care, including emergency naloxone prescription, tracking prescription monitoring reports, and contraceptive planning. Rates of completed prenatal screening for substance misuse, social determinants of health, and intimate partner violence also increased in our practice overall, as a result of this project. To further improve perinatal care coordination for patients with OUD, we recommend future evaluation of clinical checklists within various practice settings.

Sudden Shift to Telehealth in COVID-19: A Retrospective Cohort Study of Disparities in Use of Telehealth for Prenatal Care in a Large Midwifery Service.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic created disruption in health care delivery, including a sudden transition to telehealth use in mid-March 2020. The purpose of this study was to examine changes in the mode of prenatal care visits and predictors of telehealth use (provider-patient messaging, telephone visits, and video visits) during the COVID-19 pandemic among those receiving care in a large, academic nurse-midwifery service. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of those enrolled for prenatal care in 2 nurse-midwifery clinics between 2019 and 2021 (n = 3172). Use outcomes included number and type of encounter: in-person and telehealth (primary outcome). Comparisons were made in frequency and types of encounters before and during COVID-19. A negative binomial regression was fit on the outcome of telehealth encounter count, with race/ethnicity, age, language, parity, hypertension, diabetes, and depression as predictors. When comparing pre-COVID-19 (before March 2020) with during COVID-19 (after March 2020), overall encounters increased from 15.9 to 19.5 mean number of encounters per person (P < .001). The increase was driven by telehealth encounters; there were no significant differences for in-person prenatal visit counts before and during the pandemic period. Direct patient-provider messaging was the most common type of telehealth encounter. Predictors of telehealth encounters included English as primary language and diagnoses of diabetes or depression. No differences in the frequency of in-person prenatal care visits suggests that telehealth encounters led to more contact with midwives and did not replace in-person encounters. Spanish-speaking patients were least likely to use telehealth-delivered prenatal care during the pandemic; a small, but significant, proportion of patients had no or few telehealth encounters, and a significant proportion had high use of telehealth. Integration of telehealth in future delivery of prenatal care should consider questions of equity, patient and provider satisfaction, access, redundancies, and provider workload.

Demand for Maternal Health Inputs in Eastern States of India

Using NFHS-4 data, this study explores the determinants of maternal health care programmes for eastern states of India, which include prenatal care and hospital delivery. To reduce unobserved heterogeneity in the analysis, we employed the Full Information Likelihood Method, also known as the Joint Estimation Technique, in conjunction with individual probit models. Like other studies, we found place of residence, wealth, caste, religion and level of education as significant contributor for demand for both services. But, unlike earlier studies, we found that women’s age increases the use of prenatal care and hospital delivery, and the child’s birth order influences getting prenatal care. To increase the utilisation of maternal health care services, we recommend investing in health infrastructure, increasing the Janani Suraksha Yojana (JSY) subsidy amount and coverage of the Janani Shishu Suraksha Karyakram (JSSK) scheme, and promoting awareness about various government programmes among women through the Accredited Social Health Activists (ASHAs). JEL Codes: I140, I150, I180, O150

Landscape of Pregnancy Care in US Community Health Centers.

Community health centers (CHCs) provide critical health care access for people who experience high risks during and after pregnancy, however it is unclear to what extent they provide prenatal care. This study seeks to describe clinic and patient characteristics associated with longitudinal prenatal care delivery in CHC settings. This retrospective cohort study utilized electronic health record (EHR) data from the Accelerating Data Value Across a National Community Health Center Network (ADVANCE) between 2018 to 2019 to describe prenatal care provision among CHCs (n = 408), and pregnant CHC patients (n = 28,578) and compared characteristics of patients who received longitudinal prenatal care at CHCs versus those who did not. 41% of CHCs provided longitudinal prenatal care; these CHCs were more likely to be larger, have multidisciplinary teams, and serve higher proportions of nonwhite or non-English speaking patients. Patients who received longitudinal prenatal care at CHCs were racially and ethnically diverse and many had comorbidities. Patients who received longitudinal prenatal care at CHCs (compared with pregnant patients who did not) were more likely to be white or Latinx and more likely to have non-English language preference. Many CHCs in this national network provide prenatal care and serve pregnant patients at high risk of pregnancy-related complications, including people of color, those with low income, and those with comorbidities. CHCs provide critical access to care for vulnerable populations and will be an important partner in work addressing inequities in maternal morbidity and mortality.

Frequency of Prenatal Care Visits: Protocol to Develop a Core Outcome Set for Prenatal Care Schedules.

Prenatal care, one of the most common preventive care services in the United States, endeavors to improve pregnancy outcomes through evidence-based screenings and interventions. Despite the prevalence of prenatal care and its importance to maternal and infant health, there are several debates about the best methods of prenatal care delivery, including the most appropriate schedule frequency and content of prenatal visits. Current US national guidelines recommend that low-risk individuals receive a standard schedule of 12 to 14 in-office visits, a care delivery model that has remained unchanged for almost a century. In early 2020, to mitigate individuals' exposure to the SARS-CoV-2 virus, prenatal care providers implemented new paradigms that altered the schedule frequency, interval, and modality (eg, telemedicine) of how prenatal care services were offered. In this paper, we describe the development of a core outcome set (COS) that can be used to evaluate the effect of the frequency of prenatal care schedules on maternal and infant outcomes. We will systematically review the literature to identify previously reported outcomes important to individuals who receive prenatal care and the people who care for them. Stakeholders with expertise in prenatal care delivery (ie, patients or family members, health care providers, and public health professionals and policy makers) will rate the importance of identified outcomes in a web-based survey using a 3-round Delphi process. A digital consensus meeting will be held for a group of stakeholder representatives to discuss and vote on the outcomes to include in the final COS. The Delphi survey was initiated in July 2022 with invited 71 stakeholders. A digital consensus conference was conducted on October 11, 2022. Data are currently under analysis with plans to submit them in a subsequent manuscript. More research about the optimal schedule frequency and modality for prenatal care delivery is needed. Standardizing outcomes that are measured and reported in evaluations of the recommended prenatal care schedules will assist evidence synthesis and results reported in systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Overall, this COS will expand the consistency and patient-centeredness of reported outcomes for various prenatal care delivery schedules and modalities, hopefully improving the overall efficacy of recommended care delivery for pregnant people and their families. DERR1-10.2196/43962.

Magnitude and determinants of women's participation in household decision making among married women in Ethiopia, 2022: Based on Ethiopian demographic and health survey data

IntroductionWomen's strong decision-making abilities are essential to reducing maternal mortality rates. Because women's involvement in decision-making would increase uptake for healthcare services like maternal healthcare, which includes prenatal care (ANC), postnatal care (PNC), and facility delivery. Studies have revealed that women's decision-making autonomy is low, particularly in underdeveloped nations like Ethiopia. Investigating potential factors that may influence women's participation in household decision-making is the primary goal of this study project. MethodsSecondary data analysis was carried out using data from the 2016 Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey (EDHS). For the final analysis we used a weighted sample of 10,223 currently married women. All the frequencies and the percentages in the result section are weighted. The model's fitness was assessed using the Hosmer-Lemeshow test. It is the best fit (p value = 0.19). Variables with p values ≤ 0.2 in the bi-variable binary logistic regression analysis were included in the multivariable binary logistic regression analysis. The Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) was computed. Variables with a P-value of less than 0.05 in the multi variable binary logistic regression analysis were declared as statistically significant predictors of the outcome variable. ResultThe overall magnitude of women's participation in decision making among was 70.55% (CI: 69.65, 71.42). Residence (rural; AOR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.70, 0.980), educational status (None educated; AOR: 0.43, 95% CI: 0.30, 0.62, primary education AOR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.34, 0.69), religion (protestant AOR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.64, 0.81), Muslim; AOR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.78, 0.96, Others; AOR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.50, 0.87), wealth index (poor; AOR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.63, 0.79, middle; AOR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.66, 0.85), working status (Not working; AOR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.66, 0.80), husband working status (husband not working; AOR:1.69, 95% CI: 1.43, 2.0) and sex of household head (female heads; AOR: 1.29, 95% CI: 1.08, 1.54) were statistically significant factors. ConclusionGenerally women's participation in household decision making in our study was high (70.55%). It is highly affected by socio demographic and economic characteristics of women and husbands characteristics. This study indicates that educating women, improving their economic status through employment opportunities, empowering women to be head of household will enhance their participation on household decision making.

A Simulation Model of the Effects of Tailored Prenatal Care Delivery on Care Access [ID: 1377136

INTRODUCTION: The Michigan Plan for Appropriate Tailored Healthcare in pregnancy (PATH) recommends tailoring prenatal care delivery to patients’ risk factors for visit number (for low risk: 8–9 visits; for high-risk patients: 12–14 visits) and preferences for care modality (in-person only or hybrid with virtual visits). We used simulation to explore how tailored prenatal care recommendations affect care access. METHODS: A discrete event simulation was created in C++ to assess the operational effects of tailored recommendations in comparison to standard care. Patients enter the system and are divided into low-risk and high-risk categories based on medical conditions. The simulation models dynamic patient arrivals, varied patient classifications, tailored pathways, heterogeneous durations of total care, and patient flow until each patient's pathway ends (eg, childbirth). Metrics captured include patient delays, overbooked appointments, and unused capacity. The model was run with 1,000 replications during a 52-week period with a 10-year warm-up period to reach steady-state equilibrium within the simulation. The IRB designated this analysis of de-identified data exempt. RESULTS: Transitioning to the new prenatal care model reduced mean care delays per patient in all care modalities by 3.5 weeks for low-risk patients (9.79 weeks–6.37 weeks) and 0.4 weeks for high-risk patients (9.8 weeks–9.4 weeks). Tailoring care reduced the percentage of overbooked appointments by an average of 9.4% and the average unused capacity by 7.4%. CONCLUSION: Tailored prenatal care models including telemedicine result in improved operational efficiencies.

Evaluation of Patient Cost Savings in Tailored Prenatal Pathways [ID: 1375747

INTRODUCTION: The Plan for Appropriate Tailored Healthcare in pregnancy (PATH) recommends tailoring prenatal visit schedules and modality (eg, telemedicine visits) to patients' risk factors and preferences. We simulated PATH recommendations to explore financial implications from the patient perspective. METHODS: In this IRB-exempt study, a dataset of 4,992 patients from a single academic health system was used to establish key assumptions for financial modeling. The model was constructed using several key parameters: patient risk, travel, and employment variables. We report patient-perspective cost and time savings across three models: traditional care (all patients seen for 12–14 in-person visits), tailored prenatal care (visit number tailored to patient risk), and hybrid tailored care (tailored care with telemedicine and in-person visits). RESULTS: Implementation of tailored care resulted in substantial cost and time savings. In the traditional model, average travel time was 26 hours and average total cost per patient was $1,374 (time off cost, $1,310; travel cost, $64). In the tailored model, patients saved on average 5 hours of travel time and $172 (total cost, $1,201; time off cost, $1,145; travel cost, $56). In the hybrid tailored model, patients saved on average 18 hours of travel and $792 (total cost, $581; time-off cost, $525; travel cost, $21; at-home supplies, $35). Extrapolated across all patients who sought prenatal care in 2020, estimated national cost savings range from approximately $0.5B and $2B annually for the in-person tailored and hybrid tailored model, respectively. CONCLUSION: Tailored prenatal care delivery policies, particularly those that include telemedicine, result in significant time and cost savings for patients.

The Influence of Mediators on the Relationship Between Antenatal Opioid Agonist Exposure and the Severity of Neonatal Opioid Withdrawal Syndrome.

(1) To evaluate the direct (un-mediated) and indirect (mediated) relationship between antenatal exposure to opioid agonist medication as treatment for opioid use disorder (MOUD) and the severity of neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS), and (2) to understand the degree to which mediating factors influence the direct relationship between MOUD exposure and NOWS severity. This cross-sectional study includes data abstracted from the medical records of 1294 opioid-exposed infants (859 MOUD exposed and 435 non-MOUD exposed) born at or admitted to one of 30 US hospitals from July 1, 2016, to June 30, 2017. Regression models and mediation analyses were used to evaluate the relationship between MOUD exposure and NOWS severity (i.e., infant pharmacologic treatment and length of newborn hospital stay (LOS)) to identify potential mediators of this relationship in analyses adjusted for confounding factors. A direct (un-mediated) association was found between antenatal exposure to MOUD and both pharmacologic treatment for NOWS (aOR 2.34; 95%CI 1.74, 3.14) and an increase in LOS (1.73days; 95%CI 0.49, 2.98). Delivery of adequate prenatal care and a reduction in polysubstance exposure were mediators of the relationship between MOUD and NOWS severity and as thus, were indirectly associated with a decrease in both pharmacologic treatment for NOWS and LOS. MOUD exposure is directly associated with NOWS severity. Prenatal care and polysubstance exposure are potential mediators in this relationship. These mediating factors may be targeted to reduce the severity of NOWS while maintaining the important benefits of MOUD during pregnancy.

Patterns of Prenatal Care Delivery and Obstetric Outcomes before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Health care providers and health systems confronted new challenges to deliver timely, high-quality prenatal care during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic as the pandemic raised concerns that care would be delayed or substantively changed. This study describes trends in prenatal care delivery in 2020 compared with 2018 to 2019 in a large, commercially insured population and investigates changes in obstetric care processes and outcomes. This retrospective cohort study uses de-identified administrative claims for commercially insured patients. Patients whose entire pregnancy took place from March 1 to December 31 in years 2018, 2019, and 2020 were included. Trends in prenatal care, including in-person, virtual, and emergency department visits, were evaluated, as were prenatal ultrasounds. The primary outcome was severe maternal morbidity (SMM). Secondary outcomes included preterm birth and stillbirth. To determine whether COVID-19 pandemic-related changes in prenatal care had an impact on maternal outcomes, we compared the outcome rates during the pandemic period in 2020 to equivalent periods in 2018 and 2019. In total, 35,112 patients were included in the study. There was a significant increase in the prevalence of telehealth visits, from 1.1 to 1.2% prior to the pandemic to 17.2% in 2020, as well as a significant decrease in patients who had at least one emergency department visit during 2020. Overall prenatal care and ultrasound utilization were unchanged. The rate of SMM across this period was stable (2.3-2.8%) with a statistically significant decrease in the preterm birth rate in 2020 (7.4%) compared with previous years (8.2-8.6%; p < 0.05) and an unchanged stillbirth rate was observed. At a time when many fields of health care were reshaped during the pandemic, these observations reveal considerable resiliency in both the processes and outcomes of obstetric care. · Overall prenatal care and ultrasound were unchanged from 2018 to 2019 to 2020.. · There was a large increase in the prevalence of telehealth visits in 2020.. · There was no change in the rate of severe maternal morbidity or stillbirth in 2020 compared with 2018 to 2019..

Adequate Prenatal Care: An Integrative Review.

Prenatal care (PNC) is a core element of preventive care and is vital in identifying and managing conditions that can put the pregnant person and the fetus at risk. National and international guidelines differ in what is considered adequate or quality PNC. Indices of care adequacy rely only on number of attended PNC visits without regard to factors that affect a patient's ability to obtain care or the quality of the care received. This integrative review explored stakeholders' perceptions of adequate and quality PNC. Three electronic databases, CINAHL, PubMed, and Web of Science, were searched to identify original research articles published between 2012 and April 2022. Studies conducted in the United States, published in a peer-reviewed journal, and having a primary focus on the components of adequate or quality PNC were included. The quality of included studies was assessed via the Quality Assessment Tool for Studies with Diverse Designs. Thirteen articles met inclusion criteria. The concepts of adequate or quality PNC were not well defined in the literature. Studies revealed a variety of approaches to assessing individual components of PNC with at times conflicting results of what adequate or quality PNC is. Viewpoints regarding adequacy or quality of PNC were limited by the perceptions and interpretations of individual stakeholders, who included researchers, public health officials, insurers, health care providers, and patients. Ideas of how to redesign PNC were affected by study setting and stakeholders, as well as the emergence and integration of telehealth into PNC delivery. This review is a first step in identifying the gap in the research literature regarding how these concepts are defined and measured. Future research is needed to identify the relevant components of PNC that are necessary to reach consensus definitions of both adequacy and quality of PNC.

Impact of Telehealth on the Delivery of Prenatal Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Mixed Methods Study of the Barriers and Opportunities to Improve Health Care Communication in Discussions About Pregnancy and Prenatal Genetic Testing.

The COVID-19 pandemic brought significant changes in health care, specifically the accelerated use of telehealth. Given the unique aspects of prenatal care, it is important to understand the impact of telehealth on health care communication and quality, and patient satisfaction. This mixed methods study examined the challenges associated with the rapid and broad implementation of telehealth for prenatal care delivery during the pandemic. In this study, we examined patients' perspectives, preferences, and experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic, with the aim of supporting the development of successful models to serve the needs of pregnant patients, obstetric providers, and health care systems during this time. Pregnant patients who received outpatient prenatal care in Cleveland, Ohio participated in in-depth interviews and completed the Coronavirus Perinatal Experiences-Impact Survey (COPE-IS) between January and December 2021. Transcripts were coded using NVivo 12, and qualitative analysis was used, an approach consistent with the grounded theory. Quantitative data were summarized and integrated during analysis. Thematic saturation was achieved with 60 interviews. We learned that 58% (35/60) of women had telehealth experience prior to their current pregnancy. However, only 8% (5/60) of women had used both in-person and virtual visits during this pregnancy, while the majority (54/60, 90%) of women participated in only in-person visits. Among 59 women who responded to the COPE-IS, 59 (100%) felt very well supported by their provider, 31 (53%) were moderately to highly concerned about their child's health, and 17 (29%) reported that the single greatest stress of COVID-19 was its impact on their child. Lead themes focused on establishing patient-provider relationships that supported shared decision-making, accessing the information needed for shared decision-making, and using technology effectively to foster discussions during the COVID-19 pandemic. Key findings indicated that participants felt in-person visits were more personal, established greater rapport, and built better trust in the patient-provider relationship as compared to telehealth visits. Further, participants felt they could achieve a greater dialogue and ask more questions regarding time-sensitive information, including prenatal genetic testing information, through an in-person visit. Finally, privacy concerns arose if prenatal genetic testing or general pregnancy conversations were to take place outside of the health care facility. While telehealth was recognized as an option to ensure timely access to prenatal care during the COVID-19 pandemic, it also came with multiple challenges for the patient-provider relationship. These findings highlighted the barriers and opportunities to achieve effective and patient-centered communication with the continued integration of telehealth in prenatal care delivery. It is important to address the unique needs of this population during the pandemic and as health care increasingly adopts a telehealth model.