Premium Intraocular Lenses Research Articles

Belin/Ambrósio Enhanced Ectasia Display in cataract surgery and relation to final visual acuity

Objective To analyze and describe the coefficients found on maximum Ambrósio Relational Thickness-Maximum (ART-Max) and Belin/Ambrósio Enhanced Ectasia Display total deviation (BAD-D) in eyes with normal corneal topography subjected to cataract surgery with premium intraocular lens implantation and correlated these data with final visual acuity. Methods ART-Max and BAD-D data from 103 eyes of patients subjected to implantation of diffractive bifocal intraocular lens, with normal corneal topography who achieved visual acuity of 20/20 or 20/25 without correction after cataract [...]

Perfect refractive cataract surgery: still a long way to go

Refractive cataract surgery has evolved considerably in recent years owing to the rapid development in precise ocular biometry, surgical technique and instrumentation, and various astigmatism-correcting and multifocal intraocular lenses. However, inherent defects of these premium intraocular lenses should not be underestimated and neither should imperfections of measuring devices. Cataract surgery complications such as posterior capsular opacification and dry eye, which were originally infrequent or minor, are becoming increasingly prominent. Surgeons must properly understand and conduct refractive cataract surgery and there is still a long way to go before perfection.

Risk Factors Associated With Intraocular Lens Decentration After Cataract Surgery

To identify risk factors associated with intraocular lens (IOL) decentration after uneventful phacoemulsification with IOL implantation. A prospective cohort study. All patients underwent a general ophthalmologic examination. One month postoperatively, the magnitude and orientation of IOL decentration relative to the visual axis center were assessed using an OPD-Scan III aberrometer, and the vertical and horizontal decentration values were determined. Univariate and multivariate linear regression analyses were performed to evaluate the association between the IOL decentration and ocular biometric parameters. In total, 143 eyes of 143 patients were enrolled. The mean decentration magnitude was 0.27 ± 0.15 mm, and the decentration axis appeared at any orientation, with no orientation tendency. The horizontal and vertical decentration were -0.02 ± 0.22 mm and 0.01 ± 0.22 mm, respectively. Multivariate regression analysis showed that the white-to-white distance and the magnitude of angle α were positively associated with the decentration magnitude (P < .001, adj. R2=0.121), the horizontal angle κ and horizontal angle α were positively associated with the horizontal decentration (P < .001, adj. R2=0.209), and the anterior chamber depth and vertical angle κ were positively associated with the vertical decentration (P < .001, adj. R2=0.152). The IOL decentration magnitude was greater in patients with a larger white-to-white distance and a larger angle α, the horizontal decentration was greater in patients with a larger horizontal angle κ and a larger horizontal angle α, and the vertical decentration was greater in patients with a deeper anterior chamber depth and a larger vertical angle κ. In these patients, premium IOLs should be implanted cautiously.

Patient with cataract – observations after 2 years of the pandemic and future prospects

Cataract is a disease in which the natural lens becomes completely or partially cloudy. During the pandemic, there was a significant decrease in the number of cataract surgeries performed compared to previous years, due to fear of the disease and the safety of the procedures performed. Cataract surgery should be performed in patients whose visual acuity deterioration has an impact on the performance of life or work activities. Due to the pandemic, some patients report to a more advanced stage of cataract, which leads to a reduction in their quality of life. Such surgery can be associated with a higher risk of surgical complications and longer recovery time. The development of new intraocular lens technologies, increased life expectancy, as well as changing lifestyles and increased activity of the elderly contribute to the increasing choice of premium intraocular lenses by patients. These lenses enable patients to achieve satisfactory uncorrected visual acuity not only for distance, but also for near and intermediate distances.

Premium Monovision versus Bilateral Myopic Monovision, Hybrid Monovision and Bilateral Trifocal Implantation: A Comparative Study.

PurposeContemporary monovision techniques use premium intraocular lenses (IOLs), either in both eyes or at least in the non-dominant one. Primary objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of premium monovision (implantation of the trifocal diffractive Panoptix IOL in the non-dominant eye and the bifocal hybrid refractive-diffractive Restor IOL in the dominant eye), against bilateral myopic monovision (implantation of the monofocal SN60WF IOL targeting −0.50 D in the dominant eye and −1.25 D myopia in the non-dominant one), hybrid monovision (implantation of Panoptix in the non-dominant eye and SN60WF in the dominant eye) and bilateral trifocal implantation (with bilateral Panoptix implantation).MethodsThis is a prospective, comparative, clinic-based trial. Cataract patients populated four study groups: Monovision Group (MoG), Multifocal Lens Group (MfG), Hybrid Monovision Group (HmG) and Premium Monovision Group (PmG). Binocular Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity (UDVA), Uncorrected Reading Acuity and Critical Print Size at 60cm (UIRA, UICPS) and at 40cm (UNRA, UNCPS), contrast sensitivity, vision-related functional impairment, dysphotopsia symptoms and spectacle dependence were evaluated 6 months following the operation of the second eye. A mathematical model was constructed, which calculated the relative efficacy of each surgical intervention.ResultsA total of 120 participants were recruited and populated equally the study groups. Significant improvement of preoperative UDVA was observed in all study groups. No significant differences could be detected in postoperative UDVA and UIRA (p = 0.24) among study groups, while significant differences were noticed in UICPS (p = 0.04), UNRA (p = 0.02) and UNCPS (p = 0.01). Dysphotopic phenomena (glare and shadows) were significantly more in the MfG arm followed by the PmG group (p = 0.04 and p = 0.02, respectively), while perceived difficulty and spectacle independence rates were significantly better in PmG group. PmG presented the best overall relative efficacy.ConclusionAll surgical techniques present satisfactory outcomes. Premium monovision seems to demonstrate the best outcomes.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04618380. Registered 05 November 2020, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04618380.

Automatic detection of pupil reactions in cataract surgery videos.

In the light of an increased use of premium intraocular lenses (IOL), such as EDOF IOLs, multifocal IOLs or toric IOLs even minor intraoperative complications such as decentrations or an IOL tilt, will hamper the visual performance of these IOLs. Thus, the post-operative analysis of cataract surgeries to detect even minor intraoperative deviations that might explain a lack of a post-operative success becomes more and more important. Up-to-now surgical videos are evaluated by just looking at a very limited number of intraoperative data sets, or as done in studies evaluating the pupil changes that occur during surgeries, in a small number intraoperative picture only. A continuous measurement of pupil changes over the whole surgery, that would achieve clinically more relevant data, has not yet been described. Therefore, the automatic retrieval of such events may be a great support for a post-operative analysis. This would be especially true if large data files could be evaluated automatically. In this work, we automatically detect pupil reactions in cataract surgery videos. We employ a Mask R-CNN architecture as a segmentation algorithm to segment the pupil and iris with pixel-based accuracy and then track their sizes across the entire video. We can detect pupil reactions with a harmonic mean (H) of Recall, Precision, and Ground Truth Coverage Rate (GTCR) of 60.9% and average prediction length (PL) of 18.93 seconds. However, we consider the best configuration for practical use the one with the H value of 59.4% and PL of 10.2 seconds, which is much shorter. We further investigate the generalization ability of this method on a slightly different dataset without retraining the model. In this evaluation, we achieve the H value of 49.3% with the PL of 18.15 seconds.

Cataract inhibitors: Present needs and future challenges

Cataracts result from opacification of the ocular lens and represent the leading cause of blindness worldwide. After surgical removal of the diseased lens material and implantation of an artificial intraocular lens, up to 50% of cataract patients develop a secondary lens defect called posterior capsular opacification (PCO). While vision can be restored in PCO patients by a laser-mediated capsulotomy, novel therapies involving inhibition of aldose reductase are now being developed to prevent PCO development and complications of laser capsulotomy. A question we wished to address was whether cataract surgeons believe there is an unmet need for a preventative PCO therapy, whether they would prescribe such a therapy were it available, and to assess their perceptions regarding the benefits of and obstacles to adopting novel PCO therapies in the place of laser capsulotomy. We gathered perspectives from adult, pediatric, and veterinary cataract surgeons using an online questionnaire. From 161 surgeon responses, we found that the majority of adult, pediatric, and veterinary cataract surgeons (78% n = 35, 88% n = 37, and 96% n = 71 respectively) believed there is an unmet need for preventative PCO therapy, with more than 95% expressing interest in incorporating such therapy into surgical protocols. Perceived benefits included optimizing visual outcomes, avoiding the need for additional procedures, eliminating complications related to neodymium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser, preserving the posterior capsule particularly in patients receiving multifocal intraocular lens implants, providing a viable solution for PCO in animals, and using it in developing countries that lack access to neodymium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet lasers. Perceived obstacles included potential lack of reimbursement by insurance companies, and the need for strong efficacy and safety profiles. Among adult surgeons, 70% (n = 31) indicated that preventative PCO therapy could add value to premium intraocular lens packages. Our studies revealed that cataract surgeons overwhelmingly support the development of preventative PCO therapy, and that clinical trials will play a critical role to test the safety and efficacy of specific therapeutic agents.

Epiretinal membrane surgery challenges and results in patients with premium intraocular lens

Epiretinal membrane surgery challenges and results in patients with premium intraocular lens

Intraocular lens explantation following cataract surgery: Indications, techniques, and video demonstrations.

As techniques for modern cataract surgery have expanded and premium intraocular lens (IOL) use is now widespread, patient expectations are high. The need for IOL explantation, whilst still low, remains an ongoing issue. Intraocular lens explantation can be challenging for a number of reasons and as such we have introduced an additional technique to add to the surgeon's repertoire. Bimanual haptic stripping of fibrosis at the specific area where the haptic is adherent to the capsular bag is an effective strategy to aid in dissection of haptics without compromising the capsule or zonules. Given the challenges associated with IOL explantation, newly designed IOLs need to avoid these "sticking points" at which the IOLs interact with the fibrosed capsule. Techniques we have evolved and which are described below should assist anterior segment surgeons to facilitate IOL removal in an efficient and safe way.

Cataract Surgery Practice in the Republic of Korea: A Survey of the Korean Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery 2020.

PurposeTo describe current cataract surgery practice patterns and trends among Korean ophthalmologists.MethodsA survey was conducted among members of the Korean Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery in October 2020. Of the 998 questionnaires, 262 (26.3%) were received for analysis. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and compared with those of previous surveys.ResultsThe largest percentage of respondents (39%) had <5 years of practical experience, and 40% had >11 years of practical experience. The average, median, and mode monthly volumes of cataract surgeries performed by the Korean Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery members were 31, 20, and 10 cases, respectively. Topical anesthesia was administered by 85% of the respondents. For intraocular lens (IOL) calculations, 96% of the respondents used optical biometry. The proportion of surgeons providing femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery increased significantly from 5% in 2018 to 29% in 2020. This increase was accompanied by an increase in the multifocal IOLs. Those who implant multifocal IOL for >10% of their cases increased from 16% (2018) to 29% (2020). Topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were prescribed postoperatively by 76% of the respondents. Most respondents (70%) prescribed these anti-inflammatory drugs for 4 weeks.ConclusionsThis survey provided a comprehensive update on current cataract surgery practice in the Republic of Korea. The results highlighted the increasing use of premium IOLs, femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery, optical biometry, and topical anesthesia to better meet the patients’ needs.

Femtosecond Laser Assisted Cataract Surgery: A Review

ABSTRACT Femtosecond laser assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) offers a level of precision, accuracy and customization that is not possible with manual phacoemulsification (MP). With the increase of patient expectations and premium intraocular lens utilization in the era of refractive cataract surgery, predictability and accuracy has become of utmost importance. FLACS has four main functions: creation of a consistently sized round capsulotomy, treatment of keratometric astigmatism with arcuate incisions, construction of clear corneal incisions, and fragmentation and/or softening of the lens. However, FLACS may have limitations due to suction loss, incomplete capsulotomy or poor pupillary dilation. Patient selection and surgeon experience is critical. This review article will focus on the various platforms available for FLACS, the steps in cataract surgery it can perform, and overall advantages and limitations of the technology.

The evaluation of postoperative objective and subjective refraction for premium intraocular lenses

Abstract Purpose: To evaluate six different premium IOLs retrospectively in respect to both subjective and objective refraction after cataract operation. Methods: Five hundreds and seventy eyes of 285 patients with bilateral cataract who had undergone phacoemulsification and IOL implantation operation between February 2017 and September 2018 were enrolled in this study. The mean age of the patients was 57.78 ± 7.49 (41-71) years. Out of 285 patients 137 were male (48.07%) and 148 were female (51.93%). TheIOLsusedare: RayOne Trifocal (Rayner, Worthing, UK), Lucidis (Swiss Advanced Vision, Neuchâtel, Switzerland), PanOptix (Alcon, Fort Worth, USA), LentisMplus (Oculentis, Berlin, Germany), TecnisSymfony (Abbott, Illinois, USA) and Acriva Trinova (VSY Biotechnology, Istanbul, Turkey). Results: There were no significant differences among the groups regarding age, sex, axial length, the mean preoperative and postoperative uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), the mean preoperative spherical equivalent (SE) and the mean postoperative SE (subjective measurement) (P> .05). The postoperative refractions measured with autorefractometer were more myopic than subjective refractions in all patients except the patients who had PanOptix IOL. In postoperative twelfth month, the mean UCVA arrived 0.00 logMAR in 405 eyes (78.48%) , however, the mean autorefractometric measurement was -1.28 ± 1.02 (0.00_-2.75) D. Conclusion: The autorefractometer measurements of all patients who had premium IOLs except PanOptix IOL were not coherent with their visual acuities postoperatively. The ophthalmologists and/or optometrists should be careful while examining these types of patients.

Analysis of YAG Laser-Induced Damage in Intraocular Lenses: Characterization of Optical and Surface Properties of YAG Shots

Purpose: To assess differences in neodymium:yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG)-induced defects in hydrophilic and hydrophobic intraocular lenses (IOLs) and describe optical and surface properties of YAG shots/pitting. Describing and measuring the iatrogenic produced defects should achieve higher awareness on this topic and change the mindset of such a trivial procedure to be proceeded with more caution and calmness in the future. Materials: Twelve IOLs from different manufacturers made of hydrophilic and hydrophobic materials were evaluated before and after treatment with the Nd:YAG laser. Microscopy and environmental scanning electron microscopic (ESEM) images were used to visually analyze the defects. Additionally, wavefront measurements were taken for power mapping and Raman spectroscopy was performed. Vertical and horizontal dimensions of the defects were analyzed and compared, and Raman line scans assessed the changes in the chemical structure in the defect area of the IOL. Results: Microscopically, pitting of the surface could be observed in both lens types. Defects in hydrophobic lenses appeared bigger and were visible with less magnification than in hydrophilic lenses. Similar results were obtained with ESEM images where the defects in hydrophobic IOLs seemed to be frayed while defects in hydrophilic IOLs were of circular shape. Raman spectroscopy revealed deeper defects in hydrophobic lenses. Vertical dimensions of the defects were statistically significant (p = 0.036) and greater in hydrophobic materials while horizontal dimensions did not reach significance (p = 0.056). The area of chemical changes was greater than the visible defect area and smaller in hydrophilic than that in hydrophobic materials. Conclusion: Nd:YAG seems to have greater impact on hydrophobic IOL materials as that damage was greater and more frayed than that in hydrophilic materials. Moreover, there seems to be larger, distinctive damage area in IOLs (with chemical changes in the material) than that is visually recognizable. Therefore, a very cautious approach is recommended when performing capsulotomy, as defects in the surface structure can occur. This might come along with problems in quality of vision in monofocal and primarily premium IOLs (multifocal, enhanced depth of focus, and toric IOLs), dependent on the size, dimension, and position in the IOL. YAG capsulotomy should not be considered trivial but should be carried out with precision and without time pressure, just like surgery itself.

Corneal Topography for Intraocular Lens Selection in Refractive Cataract Surgery

The purpose of this review is to evaluate the usefulness of corneal topography to select premium intraocular lenses (IOLs), including aspherical IOLs, toric IOLs, and multifocal IOLs, in refractive cataract surgery. Corneal topography can detect corneal regular astigmatism, corneal irregular astigmatism (higher-order aberrations [HOAs]) including spherical aberration, and corneal shape abnormalities after corneal refractive surgery. Surgeons can explain to the patients with significant corneal HOAs about its effect on postoperative visual function before surgery. Multifocal IOLs should not be selected for such eyes. For eyes with abnormal corneal shape, appropriate IOL power calculation formulae can be applied. In the case of toric IOLs, regular astigmatism and corneal HOAs should be checked. Before implanting an aspheric IOL, it is ideal to confirm spherical aberration of the cornea is not below the normal range. Because corneal HOAs, abnormal corneal shape after corneal refractive surgery, corneal regular astigmatism, and corneal spherical aberration increase postoperative refractive errors and poor vision quality with premium IOLs, corneal topography before cataract surgery is helpful in screening patients who are not appropriate candidates for premium IOLs.

Comparison of central topographic maps from a swept-source OCT biometer and a Placido disk-dual Scheimpflug tomographer.

To compare central topography (CT) from IOLMaster 700 with predicate topographic (PT) maps from a Placido disk-dual Scheimpflug tomographer in detection of irregularities that would influence the decision-making for implanting premium intraocular lenses (IOLs) (toric, multifocal, or extended depth-of-focus). Cullen Eye Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas. Prospective comparative case series. Eyes with various corneal conditions were randomly selected: regular/irregular corneas, previous corneal refractive surgery, and keratoconus or pellucid marginal degeneration. Three observers compared the CT and PT maps and answered a questionnaire for each eye. The questionnaire focused on (1) overall shape similarity between CT and PT and (2) decision-making for premium IOL implantation based on CT and PT. Answers to the questionnaire and agreement in answers among observers were evaluated. The study included 105 eyes. Comparing CT and PT, similar shape was observed in 68.6% to 89.5% of cases, and comparable map symmetries were reported in 60.0% to 83.8%; the same decision regarding premium IOL implantation was made in 75.2% to 97.1% of cases. There were significant interobserver agreements among 3 observers for all questions, with Fleiss κ values ranging from 0.141 to 0.450 (all P < .05). Peripheral corneal steeping or flattening was the primary finding that was visible on PT but not on CT. Compared with the PT, CT provided similar overall shape and comparable symmetries in most cases. The same decision was made whether to recommend a premium IOL based on CT and PT in 75% to 97% of cases.

Prevention and management of refractive prediction errors following cataract surgery.

Patient satisfaction after modern day cataract surgery requires excellent surgical technique but increasingly demands superior refractive outcomes as well. In many cases, there exists an expectation from patients, as well as surgeons, to achieve emmetropia after cataract surgery. This is particularly true in patients electing premium intraocular lens technology to correct astigmatism and presbyopia to minimize spectacle dependence. Despite continued advances in preoperative and intraoperative diagnostics, refractive planning, and surgical technology, residual refractive error remains a primary source of dissatisfaction after cataract surgery. The need to enhance refractive outcomes and treat residual astigmatic or spherical refractive errors postoperatively becomes paramount to meeting the expectations of patients in their surgical outcome. This article reviews the potential preoperative and intraoperative pitfalls that can be the source of refractive error, the various options to enhance refractive outcomes, and potential future technologies to limit residual refractive error after cataract surgery.

Visual outcomes after bilateral implantation of a new generation diffractive trifocal intraocular lens

Cataract surgery today has become more of a refractive surgery with high patient expectations and demand of independence from glasses. Modern cataract surgery is characterized by obtaining precise postoperative target refraction with the premium intraocular lenses (IOLs) available today. The multifocal IOLs are designed to reduce the spectacle dependence after cataract surgery. Previously a variety of studies were performed that confirmed a significant improvement in uncorrected visual acuity after implantation of multifocal IOLs as compared to monofocal IOLs.1‒5 Initially multifocal IOLs that were designed were having a bifocal design which allowed the patient to have a good distance and near visual acuity post operatively, but near vision came at the expense of reduced contrast sensitivity.6‒8 Nowadays, due to increased use of computers the preference of spectacles has changed from near to intermediate distance. In this sense achieving an intermediate vision with an IOL is a good option. The IOL technologies in the latest times help in rehabilitating the distance and near visual acuities and also by incorporating a component of intermediate vision (ie, trifocal IOLs) to ensure spectacle independence.9‒11 The present study aims at assessing the performance of AT LISA tri 839MP trifocal diffractive IOL in terms of visual acuity and independence from spectacles. The other objectives are to assess changes in the distance, near and intermediate visual acuities, contrast sensitivity postoperatively and plotting the defocus curves.

Premium intraocular lens implantation in eyes with vitrectomy done.

Phacoemulsification with premium intraocular lens (IOL) implantation has been increasingly popular in the recent years. However, it is not commonly implanted in eyes who had underwent previous vitrectomy surgery as the contrast sensitivity is thought to be reduced and surgeons are worried about poor visualization of the posterior segment after implantation. Since cataract and vitreoretinal diseases often coexist, premium IOLs should be a considerable option for implantation in carefully selected cases. This study aims at reporting the postoperative near and distance visual acuity and subjective quality of vision in eyes with premium IOLs implantation and vitrectomy done. Twenty eyes with posterior vitrectomy and premium IOL implantation from 2006 to 2018 were included. Fourteen eyes were included in Group 1 with patients who underwent a combined phacovitrectomy surgery in the same setting, and six eyes were included in Group 2 with patients who received premium IOL implantation after previous posterior vitrectomy. Both the postoperative corrected distance and near visual acuity at 1month, 3month and 1year are improved in both groups. The subjective quality of vision as graded by the National Eye Institute Refractive Error Quality of Life Instrument-42 questionnaire also showed high patient satisfaction in both groups. We conclude that the presence of a multifocal IOL does not impede visualization of the posterior segment during vitrectomy surgery and surgical complications were not raised. With careful patient selection and preoperative assessment, premium IOLs can be a considerable option in patients requiring posterior vitrectomy. Retrospectively registered with the HKSH Medical Group Research Committee (Ref No. RC-2019-31, Date of registration: December 13, 2019).

Impact of Preoperative Video Education for Cataract Surgery on Patient Learning Outcomes.

PurposeTo assess the effect of an educational video on 1) patient knowledge about cataract surgery, 2) patient perception of preoperative assessment visit quality, 3) face-to-face time with the surgeon, and 4) choices regarding premium intraocular lenses (IOLs) or laser-assisted cataract surgery (LACS).SettingEye clinic in an academic medical center.DesignProspective survey of patients who randomly viewed or did not view an educational video.MethodsPatients of three cataract surgeons completed a survey during cataract surgery preoperative visits. One group viewed an educational video about cataract surgery, while the other did not. All patients received their surgeon’s typical preoperative counseling.ResultsA total of 101 patients were surveyed. Out of 101 patients, 58 viewed the educational video. Patients who viewed the video exhibited stronger learning outcomes; in particular, patients who viewed the video scored higher on cataract surgery educational assessments than those who did not (83% vs 76%, p=0.032), particularly on the assessment of postoperative visual expectations (98% vs 80%, p=0.003). Differences in educational assessment scores between groups were not affected by which surgeon patients saw (p=0.807). Patients who watched the video were more likely to agree their surgeon provided quality explanations (93% vs 74% strongly agreed, p=0.025) and trended toward greater perception the surgeon spent enough time with them (p=0.067). Video education did not affect face-to-face surgeon time with patients (p=0.212) or choices of multifocal IOLs (p=0.795), toric IOLs (p=0.321), or LACS (p=0.940).ConclusionVideo education during preoperative cataract surgery assessments improved patient understanding of cataract surgery and perception of preoperative visits. Video education is easily integrated into preoperative visits and can enhance the preoperative experience.

Cataract surgery in patients with left ventricular assist devices.

To determine the safety and efficacy of cataract surgery in patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs). Duke Eye Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA. Retrospective case series. Electronic medical records were used to collect patient demographics, preoperative planning, intraoperative details, and postoperative outcomes of patients with LVADs who underwent cataract surgery between March 2012 and August 2019. A total of 53 cataract surgeries were identified involving 31 patients. Most patients were men (n = 27) and white (n = 25) with a mean age of 69.5 years. Preoperative biometry was unchanged from standard protocol. Femtosecond laser, intraoperative aberrometry, and/or a premium IOL was used in 25 cases (47.2%) . Patients were on warfarin, warfarin plus aspirin, and warfarin plus clopidogrel in 51.6% (n = 16), 45.2% (n = 14), and 3.2% (n = 1) of cases, respectively. Patients underwent topical anesthesia with monitored anesthesia care from an experienced LVAD team as planned with no episodes of hemodynamic instability, respiratory compromise, or intraoperative adverse events related to the LVAD. All patients were discharged the same day as surgery. There were no hospitalizations or deaths within 30 days that were attributed to the cataract procedure. At 1 month postoperatively, 61.1% of eyes were ±0.5 diopter of their predicted spherical equivalent (n = 11/18), with a high proportion of patients returning to local providers for postoperative care. Cataract surgery was safe and feasible in patients with LVADs when performed with additional perioperative considerations and in conjunction of an experienced LVAD team. The presence of LVAD itself was not found to be a contraindication for cataract surgery.