Preliminary Efficacy Data Research Articles

PRE-ISPY phase I/Ib oncology platform program (PRE-I-SPY-P1).

e12641 Background: Many promising agents or combinations regimens relevant to breast cancer lack sufficient clinical information for use in the neoadjuvant setting. To enable acceleration of drug development by reducing time and cost of clinical trial planning and conduct, the Phase I initiative PRE-ISPY Program was created. Methods: The PRE-ISPY Program is built within the I-SPY network, with the overall aim to streamline the regulatory pathway and the processes of trial design, contracting, activation, enrollment, execution, data gathering and analysis, as well as reporting of new therapeutic agents or combinations of relevance to breast cancer. Results: The PRE-ISPY trial is an open-label platform phase IB study designed to evaluate compelling single agent or combination regimens with the overall goal of moving promising drug regimens into I-SPY2 Trial and/or into other oncology-based trials in a timely manner. Graduation of a PRE-ISPY regimen to I-SPY2 is not mandatory. The primary objectives in each study Arm are to determine safety and to obtain preliminary efficacy data of the new regimen in patients with metastatic cancer, including a cohort of breast cancer patients. Each Arm may contain a Part 1 (dose finding) and a Part 2 (dose expansion). The new treatment can be tested also in patients with other solid malignancies than breast cancer, in which the treatment may be applicable, as specified in the design of the Arm. A breast cancer specific cohort is required in Part 2. Candidate treatment regimens are selected with advice from the I-SPY2 Agent Selection Working Group. The PRE-ISPY/Phase IB trial has multiple ongoing drug regimen Arms subsequently added as new protocol appendices through amendments to a Master protocol. There is no randomization; participants are enrolled, and treatment selected according to the relevance of therapy to their disease. Prospective companion biomarkers are evaluated. The current arms under study are PRE1: ALX-148 combined with trastuzumab deruxtecan; PRE2: tucatinib combined with zanidatamab; and PRE3: vidutolimod combined with cemiplimab. Selected agents or therapeutic combinations are tested through this protocol in the I-SPY Network Centers that participate in the PRE-ISPY Program. Toxicities are graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). Clinical responses are evaluated based on RECIST v1.1 criteria. Conclusions: Once safety is established, promising regimens can be rapidly transitioned to I-SPY 2.2 or other phase 2/3 trials. The first patient was enrolled on 2/1/2023. Clinical trial information: NCT05868226 .

Safety and immunological effects of ablative radiotherapy followed by pembrolizumab in patients with advanced adrenocortical carcinoma.

TPS4630 Background: Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare and aggressive cancer with poor prognosis. While pembrolizumab is a NCCN recommended treatment, our prior study showed no benefit in patients with liver metastases (NCT02673333).1 Preclinical evidence suggests combining liver-directed radiation therapy (RT) with pembrolizumab might enhance anti-tumor immunity.2 Our current study will assess the safety and describe preliminary efficacy data for ablative RT to symptomatic liver metastases followed by treatment with pembrolizumab in patients with advanced ACC. Methods: This is a single-center pilot study. Main inclusion criteria include: adult patients with metastatic ACC with symptomatic liver metastases, presence of extrahepatic metastases, ECOG 0-1. Ablative RT in 5 or 10 once daily fractions will be delivered over 1 to 2 weeks; pembrolizumab treatment (200mg Q3W) will begin one week after RT completion. The primary objective is to evaluate the safety of treatment with ablative RT followed by pembrolizumab. The study will include a 6 patient safety lead-in, with 10 to 12 patients enrolled in total. The secondary endpoint, efficacy, is defined as the objective response (partial and complete response) according to RECIST v1.1, in the hepatic and extrahepatic disease. Correlative objectives include evaluation of the innate and adaptive immune response during treatment through analysis of pre- and on-treatment blood and tumor tissue samples, circulating tumor (ct) DNA analyses, and PD-L1 and next-generation sequencing testing in pre-treatment tumor tissue samples to evaluate for biomarkers of response and resistance. This trial began enrollment in 9/27/2023, with 3 patients enrolled to date.

Elacestrant in combination with abemaciclib in patients (pts) with brain metastasis from estrogen receptor-positive (ER+), HER2-negative (HER2-) breast cancer: Preliminary data from ELECTRA, an open-label, multicenter, phase 1b/2 study.

1064 Background: Endocrine therapy plus a CDK4/6 inhibitor (ET+CDK4/6i) is the mainstay in first-line ER+, HER2- mBC; however, tumors develop resistance to ET. In EMERALD, single-agent elacestrant was associated with significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and a manageable safety profile vs standard-of-care (SOC) ET in pts with ER+, HER2-, estrogen receptor 1 mutated ( ESR1-mut) mBC previously treated with ET+CDK4/6i, resulting in the first oral SERD approved. Pts in the elacestrant arm had a 45% reduction in the risk of progression or death vs SOC ET (HR = 0.55; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.77; p = 0.0005) (1). In those pts with ≥12 months’ prior ET+CDK4/6i, median PFS with elacestrant was 8.6 mo vs 1.9 mo with SOC ET (SABCS 2022). To address additional resistance mechanisms and enable an oral-oral combination, ELECTRA (NCT05386108) phase 1b is evaluating the safety of elacestrant + abemaciclib in pts regardless of metastases site and ESR1 status. Phase 2 will evaluate efficacy and safety of the combination in pts with brain metastases since both compounds cross the blood-brain barrier (2,3). Methods: Eligible pts have ER+, HER2- mBC. For phase 1b, brain metastases are not required for eligibility. For phase 2, presence of ≥1 active and measurable brain metastases per RECIST v1.1 is required. In the mBC setting, pts must have previously received ≥1 ET, ≤2 chemotherapy regimens, and 0-2 prior CDK4/6i (excluding abemaciclib). The phase 1b primary objective is to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of elacestrant + abemaciclib. For this analysis, RP2D, updated adverse events (AEs) and preliminary efficacy for the combination from the phase 1b portion will be presented. Results: As of January 2024, 26 pts were enrolled in the phase 1b elacestrant + abemaciclib cohorts, none with brain metastases. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed. RP2D of elacestrant with abemaciclib will be reported. The most common all-grade (Gr) AEs were diarrhea (n=21, 81%; 0 Gr3), nausea (n=16, 62%; 0 Gr3), and decreased neutrophils/neutropenia (n=13, 50%; n=10, 38% Gr 3). No Gr4 AEs or Gr3 diarrhea were observed. In 21 evaluable pts, 6 had partial response (1 unconfirmed) and 9 had stable disease (2 unconfirmed) as best tumor response. To date, up to 11 cycles of the combination have been administered. Updated safety, PK, and preliminary efficacy will be reported. Conclusions: The RP2D for elacestrant + abemaciclib will be reported; the combinationdemonstrated a manageable and predictable safety profile. Preliminary efficacy data showed encouraging antitumor activity. Elacestrant has the potential to become the ET backbone for combination regimens. 1. Bidard, 2022. 2.Conlan, 2020. 3.Tolaney, 2020. Clinical trial information: NCT05386108 .

Tucatinib-trastuzumab-capecitabine for treatment of leptomeningeal metastasis in HER2+ breast cancer: TBCRC049 phase 2 study results.

2018 Background: Treatment options for patients with leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) are limited and prognosis is poor. Tucatinib is a potent, highly selective HER2-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor. The combination of tucatinib-trastuzumab-capecitabine is approved for patients with metastatic HER2+ breast cancer, with or without brain metastases, who have received ≥ 1 prior HER2-based regimens in the metastatic setting. Patients with LM were excluded from HER2CLIMB (NCT02614794). The aim of this study was to determine the benefit of this regimen in patients with HER2+ breast cancer and LM. We previously reported preliminary efficacy data, with a median OS of 10 months and a median time to CNS progression of 6.9 months. Here, we present additional data on LM objective response, provider-rated neurologic clinical exam, and patient-reported outcomes (PRO). Methods: TBCRC049 (NCT03501979) is an investigator-initiated phase 2 study evaluating a tucatinib-trastuzumab-capecitabine regimen in adults with HER2+ breast cancer and newly diagnosed LM. Eligible patients had a Karnofsky performance status > 50 and untreated LM (defined as positive CSF cytology and/or radiographic evidence of LM plus clinical signs/symptoms). In 21-day cycles, patients received PO tucatinib, PO capecitabine, and IV trastuzumab. The primary endpoint was OS. LM objective response was assessed using a composite of neuroaxis imaging, neurologic clinical exam, and CSF cytology, derived from RANO-LM. The clinical exam incorporated the NANO scoring tool and symptom evaluation using MDASI-BT. Up to 4 provider-rated baseline target neuro deficits were monitored. An imaging scorecard was used. PROs were assessed using the LASA and MDASI-BT tools. Results: Enrollment was planned for 30 patients but closed at 17 patients following FDA approval of tucatinib (April 2020). All patients (median age 53 years) had MRI evidence of LM, 15 (88%) were symptomatic, and 8 (47%) had abnormal CSF cytology. At data cutoff (7/20/21), 5 (38%) of 13 response-eligible patients achieved LM objective response per the composite criteria at first response assessment, and all 13 (100%) achieved clinical benefit (SD, PR, or CR). Notably, 7 (58%) of 12 evaluable patients with target neurologic deficits at baseline experienced improvement of deficits. All 17 completed ≥ 75% of LASA and MDASI-BT PRO questionnaires at pre-specified timepoints. The mean improvement in LASA score was 13.5, indicating improved QOL and the mean improvement in MDASI-BT score was 32, indicating improved symptom burden. Conclusions: This is the first prospective evidence of clinically meaningful benefit including objective responses, symptom improvement, and quality of life, along with extended survival, with a systemic regimen for LM from HER2+ BC. These data support the trend toward using systemic therapy as an initial approach in CNS metastases. Clinical trial information: NCT03501979 .

A phase 1, first-in-human study of CUSP06, a cadherin-6 (CDH6) -directed antibody-drug conjugate, in patients with platinum-refractory/resistant ovarian cancer and other advanced solid tumors.

TPS3166 Background: Cadherin-6 (CDH6) is a transmembrane glycoprotein involved in cancer metastasis and invasion expressed in various tumor types including ovarian cancer (OC), renal cell carcinoma (RCC), papillary thyroid cancer, cholangiocarcinoma, hepatocellular cancer, glioma, uterine serous carcinoma and non-small cell lung cancer. CUSP06 is an antibody-drug conjugate composed of a human IgG1 monoclonal antibody against CDH6 conjugated with a protease-cleavable linker, T1000, to exatecan, a topoisomerase I inhibitor payload. In preclinical studies, CUSP06 showed CDH6-dependent cell growth inhibition in ovarian cancer cell lines. High CDH6-expressing ovarian and renal CDX and PDX models demonstrated tumor regression after treatment with CUSP06, as did low CDH6-expressing PDX models of other solid tumors. Methods: This is a Phase 1a/1b, open-label, multicenter dose escalation and expansion study to evaluate safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D), and preliminary efficacy of CUSP06 in patients with platinum-refractory/resistant ovarian cancer (PRROC), advanced RCC and other advanced CDH6-positive solid tumors. Patients with advanced solid tumors previously treated with standard of care systemic therapy, or for whom no standard therapy is available are eligible for enrollment. Prescreening for CDH6 expression will be required for those patients with solid tumors other than PRROC or RCC. CUSP06 will be administered intravenously every 21 days. Phase 1a will follow a standard 3+3 dose escalation design. Phase 1a also includes up to 3 dose enrichment cohorts at doses that have demonstrated safety, each with a maximum of 18 patients, to generate additional safety, PK, PD, and preliminary efficacy data to support an optimized dose for expansion. Phase 1b consists of several dose expansion cohorts including PRROC, RCC, and other CDH6-positive solid tumors, to be enrolled according to Simon's 2-stage design. Mandatory pre- and on-study biopsies in dose expansion cohorts will support a robust exploratory biomarker plan that may include correlation of CDH6 levels with response, and other RNA and protein markers of sensitivity and resistance. The study is currently enrolling in Phase 1a dose-escalation. Clinical trial information: NCT06234423 .

Appropriate Treatment Intensity for Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma in the Older Population: A Review of the Literature.

Most patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) are >65 years of age, with the number of patients expected to increase in the coming years. A comprehensive geriatric assessment that carefully evaluates fitness status and comorbidities is essential for selecting the appropriate treatment intensity. Although generally healthy patients or those <80 years of age may benefit from standard immunochemotherapy, unfit/frail patients or patients >80 years old may require reduced-intensity chemotherapy or less-toxic drugs. Some new drugs are currently being tested as single or combined agents for first-line treatment, aiming to improve the outcomes of conventional chemotherapy. This review systematically collates and discusses the outcomes associated with the use of immunochemotherapy in older patients with DLBCL, as well as considering the impact of full-dose immunochemotherapy on quality of life in older and frail patients, summarizing the rationale for reduced dosing in the older population, and presenting recommendations for selecting patients likely to benefit from reduced dosing. If preliminary efficacy and safety data are confirmed in future clinical trials, non-chemotherapy-based immunotherapy approaches could become an alternative potentially curative option in frail patients and those >80 years of age with DLBCL.

REAL WORLD USAGE OF RANOLAZINE FOR ANTIARRHYTHMIC PURPOSES: SINGLE CENTER EXPERIENCE

Abstract Introduction Ranolazine is a late sodium current blocking drug developed as an antianginal agent, with good preliminary efficacy data even for antiarrhythmic purposes (both at atrial and at ventricular level). Objectives To evaluate patients’ clinical characteristics and antiarrhythmic efficacy of ranolazine in subjects with a history of atrial and/or ventricular arrhythmias, isolated or repetitive. Patients and methods we included patients who received a first prescription of ranolazine for antiarrhythmic purposes in our center from 1/2022 to 11/2023 and evaluated the survival free from major arrhythmic relapses/ablation. Results 93 patients were enrolled (66±13 years, 15% women): 59% with arterial hypertension, 26% diabetics, 46% with post–ischemic dilated heart disease, 32% with primary cardiomyopathy (including 11% with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, 10% with LMNA, 14% with TTN), 46% with implantable cardioverter defibrillator, 9% with pacemaker. The mean LV ejection fraction was 42 ± 15%, the mean serum creatinine 1 ± 0.3 mg/dL. Half (50%) had a history of atrial arrhythmias in the 6 months before starting the drug, mainly paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF), 67% of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs), mainly isolated and repetitive premature ventricular beats (PVB, 47% of the total), but also sustained or treated VAs (n=18, 19%). Overall, 18% of patients had already undergone AF ablation, 13% ventricular tachycardia ablation, 3% cardiac sympathetic denervation. Finally, 95% of patients were on beta–blocker therapy and 28% were on amiodarone. Ranolazine was prescribed at an average initial dose of 535± 150 mg. The majority (54%) of patients (n=50) had a follow–up longer than 3 months (median 9 months, IQR 6–14); in 6% the drug was stopped due to intolerance and the average dose at the last FU was 641 ± 150 mg. Twenty–eight percent of patients with paroxysmal/persistent atrial arrhythmias had relapses, requiring ablation in 6%. Among patients with major VAs, 57% suffered recurrences, but only 19% required ablation (invasive in 2 cases, non–invasive in 1 case). Finally, among the patients with PVBs, none suffered major VAs or required PVB/VA ablation. Conclusions This is the largest available case–series reporting about the real–world usage of ranolazine for antiarrhythmic purposes. Our single center experience supports ranolazine’s good safety and tolerability and shows encouraging efficacy results in terms of clinical stabilization of complex patients.

Pilot study with randomised control of dual site theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) for methamphetamine use disorder: a protocol for the TARTAN study

BackgroundTranscranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) (including the theta burst stimulation (TBS) form of TMS used in this study) is a non-invasive means to stimulate nerve cells in superficial areas of the brain. In recent years, there has been a growth in the application of TMS to investigate the modulation of neural networks involved in substance use disorders. This study examines the feasibility of novel TMS protocols for the treatment of methamphetamine (MA) use disorder in an ambulatory drug and alcohol treatment setting.MethodsThirty participants meeting the criteria for moderate to severe MA use disorder will be recruited in community drug and alcohol treatment settings and randomised to receive active TMS or sham (control) intervention. The treatment is intermittent TBS (iTBS) applied to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), then continuous TBS (cTBS) to the left orbitofrontal cortex (OFC). Twelve sessions are administered over 4 weeks with opt-in weekly standardized cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) counselling and a neuroimaging sub-study offered to participants. Primary outcomes are feasibility measures including recruitment, retention and acceptability of the intervention. Secondary outcomes include monitoring of safety and preliminary efficacy data including changes in substance use, cravings (cue reactivity) and cognition (response inhibition).DiscussionThis study examines shorter TBS protocols of TMS for MA use disorder in real-world drug and alcohol outpatient settings where withdrawal and abstinence from MA, or other substances, are not eligibility requirements. TMS is a relatively affordable treatment and staff of ambulatory health settings can be trained to administer TMS. It is a potentially scalable and translatable treatment for existing drug and alcohol clinical settings. TMS has the potential to provide a much-needed adjuvant treatment to existing psychosocial interventions for MA use disorder. A limitation of this protocol is that the feasibility of follow-up is only examined at the end of treatment (4 weeks).Trial registrationAustralia New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry ACTRN12622000762752. Registered on May 27, 2022, and retrospectively registered (first participant enrolled) on May 23, 2022, with protocol version 7 on February 24, 2023.

Abstract RF01-07: The efficacy and safety of tinengotinib in patients with advanced or metastatic HR+/HER2- breast cancer or TNBC

Abstract Background: Tinengotinib is a novel multiple kinase inhibitor that strongly inhibits Aurora A/B, FGFR1/2/3, VEGFRs, JAK1/2, and CSF1R. Here we present the preliminary safety, pharmacokinetic and efficacy data of tinengotinib in patients (pts) with hormone receptor positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-) breast cancer (BC) and triple-negative BC (TNBC) from Phase I TT420X2101 (NCT03654547) and Phase Ib/II TT420X1103 (NCT04742959) trials. Methods: Eligible pts with HR+/HER2- BC or TNBC who have no available standard therapeutic treatment options were enrolled to the TT420X2101 and TT420X1103 trials. Tinengotinib was given as monotherapy at different dose levels (5 mg QD, 10 mg QD and 12 mg QD); different dosing schedule (6 mg BID); and as combination (tinengotinib 8 mg QD and Abraxane 100 mg/m2). Recruitment spanned from January 2019 to March 2023. Results: As of June 2023, 36 pts with metastatic BC were treated: 30 with tinengotinib monotherapy at dose levels of 5 mg QD (n=1), 8 mg QD (n=4), 10 mg QD (n=5), 12 mg QD (n=18), 6 mg BID (n=2) and 6 with tinengotinib 8 mg QD in combination with nab-paclitaxel 100 mg/m2. Median age 51 years (range 24-75), ECOG PS 1 in 83.3% of pts, median lines of prior therapy were 5, and 77.8% of pts had prior taxanes. Of 30 pts receiving tinengotinib monotherapy, treatment related adverse events (TRAEs) were reported in 26 (86.7%) pts. 43.4% were Grade (G) 1-2, 43.3% were G3. No G4 or G5 TRAEs were reported. Common TRAEs (≥20%) of tinengotinib monotherapy were hypertension (60.0%), stomatitis (50.0%), palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome (46.7%) and diarrhea (20.0%). All six (100%) pts receiving tinengotinib in combination with nab-paclitaxel experienced TRAEs, 16.7% were G1, 66.7% were G3, no G4 TRAEs, and one pt had G5 (pulmonary hemorrhage). Common TRAEs (≥20%) of tinengotinib in combination with nab-paclitaxel were neutrophil count decreased/neutropenia (50.0%), stomatitis (50.0%), hypertension (33.3%), hyponatremia (33.3%), hypokalemia (33.3%), and nausea (33.3%). Twenty-eight pts receiving tinengotinib monotherapy were efficacy evaluable. 11 pts with HR+/HER2- BC achieved objective response rate (ORR) of 45.5%, clinical benefit rate (CBR, CR+PR+SD ≥ 24 weeks) of 54.5% and median progression-free survival (mPFS) of 5.55 (95% CI 1.97-6.18) months. Partial responses were seen in 3 pts with HER2-zero (n=5) and 2 pts with HER2 low (1+/2+) pts (n=6), respectively. 17 pts with TNBC had ORR of 23.5%, CBR of 29.4% and mPFS of 2.73 (95% CI 1.68-6.41) months. In 6 pts treated with tinengotinib in combination with nab-paclitaxel, one out of 2 pts with HR+/HER2- BC achieved PR for 13 weeks as of data cutoff; two out of 4 pts with TNBC had SD. No significant difference in exposure was observed between tinengotinib monotherapy and tinengotinib in combination with nab-paclitaxel. Conclusions: Tinengotinib for the treatment of HR+HER2- BC or TNBC, whether as monotherapy or in combination with nab-paclitaxel, had manageable side effects. Tinengotinib has shown promising clinical benefit in heavily pre-treated pts with refractory HR+HER2- BC or TNBC. Clinical benefit was similar across the subgroups of pts with HR+ HER2-zero and HR+ HER2 low disease. Citation Format: Piha-Paul Sarina, Binghe Xu, Ying Fan, Yuan Yuan, Sayeh Lavasani, Joanne Mortimer, Sanjay Goel, Apostolia Tsimberidou, Nuhad Ibrahim, Sausan Abouharb, Carlos Barcenas, Adaeze lheme, Daniel Karp, Jordi Rodon Ahnert, Ecaterina Dumbrava, Jean Fan, Peng Peng, Caixia Sun, Hui Wang, Katie Hennessy, Ximei Fu, Ruolan Xu, Shumao Ni, Frank Wu, Funda Meric-Bernstam. The efficacy and safety of tinengotinib in patients with advanced or metastatic HR+/HER2- breast cancer or TNBC [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr RF01-07.

Abstract PO1-24-04: Gedatolisib, a pan-PI3K/mTOR inhibitor, shows superior potency and efficacy relative to other PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway inhibitors in breast cancer models

Abstract Background: The PI3K, AKT, and mTOR (PAM) pathway is frequently activated in breast cancer (BC). Current standard-of-care therapy options for patients with advanced BC (ABC) include PAM inhibitors (PAMi), such as everolimus and alpelisib, and hormonal therapy, such as letrozole and fulvestrant. Most PAMi selectively inhibit one or only a few PAM pathway components, which can lead to drug resistance. To minimize drug resistance, a more comprehensive inhibition of the multiple PI3K isoforms and downstream mTOR complexes may be required. We hypothesized that gedatolisib, which potently inhibits all Class I PI3K isoforms, as well as mTORC1 and mTORC2, can be more effective in BC cells than a PAMi targeting single PAM pathway components. Methods: A panel of BC cell lines with mutated or non-mutated PAM pathway genes (PIK3CA, PTEN, AKT) were evaluated for their sensitivity to gedatolisib and other PAMi (PI3K-α: alpelisib; AKT: capivasertib; mTORC1: everolimus; pan-PI3K/mTOR: gedatolisib). Cell viability, growth rate inhibition, and cell death were evaluated by luciferase- and fluorescence-based assays, both in monolayer cultures and three-dimensional (3D) cultures on reconstituted basement membrane. Flow cytometry analytical assays were conducted to assess DNA synthesis (EdU incorporation), protein synthesis (OPP incorporation), and PAM pathway activity (RPS6 and 4EBP1 phosphorylation). BC xenograft studies evaluating gedatolisib in vivo were also performed. Results: Gedatolisib strongly inhibited PAM pathway activity and reduced cell viability and growth rate in the cell lines tested. Compared to the other PAMi, gedatolisib exhibited more potent and efficacious anti-proliferative and cytotoxic effects, regardless of the cell lines’ PI3K pathway mutational status. Gedatolisib effects were confirmed in 3D culture on reconstituted basement membrane, where gedatolisib inhibited tumor cell spheroid growth and induced regression. Mechanistically, gedatolisib decreased both DNA and protein synthesis more effectively than the other PAMi tested. Gedatolisib also exerted superior anti-proliferative and cytotoxic effects relative to the other PAMi tested in estrogen receptor-positive BC cell lines concomitantly treated with fulvestrant. BC xenografts confirmed growth inhibitory effects of gedatolisib in vivo. Conclusions: The pan-PI3K/mTOR inhibitor, gedatolisib, may more effectively address potential drug resistance mechanisms associated with narrowly targeted PAM inhibitors. Gedatolisib has previously demonstrated promising preliminary clinical efficacy and safety data in ABC in combination with hormonal therapy. A Phase 3 study (VIKTORIA-1) evaluating gedatolisib plus fulvestrant with and without palbociclib is underway in patients with ABC. Citation Format: Stefano Rossetti, Aaron Broege, Adrish Sen, Salmaan Khan, Ian MacNeil, Jhomary Molden, Igor Gorbatchevsky, Brian F. Sullivan, Lance Laing. Gedatolisib, a pan-PI3K/mTOR inhibitor, shows superior potency and efficacy relative to other PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway inhibitors in breast cancer models [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO1-24-04.

Occupation-Based Intervention for People With Multiple Sclerosis: A Feasibility Study.

This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of an occupation-based intervention (OBI) on dexterity and occupational performance for people with multiple sclerosis (MS) and to gather preliminary efficacy data. In this feasibility study, 2 women with MS participated in 12 OBI sessions that focused on increasing upper extremity function. The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure, 9-Hole Peg Test, Expanded Disability Status Scale, Montreal Cognitive Assessment, and Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) were used as outcome measures. The scores of these assessments are reported descriptively. According to preliminary data, both participants demonstrated improvements in dexterity, occupational performance, and occupational performance satisfaction. These data suggest that OBI may be implemented effectively in Iran. OBI improved the functional use of the participants' upper extremities as well as their occupational performance and satisfaction with their occupational performance in each of the 2 women with MS. This preliminary intervention program should be further tested using randomized controlled trials.

Improving executive functions at school. Integrating metacognitive exercise in class and computerized training at home to ensure training intensity and generalization. A feasibility pilot study

AbstractPrevious research has demonstrated the effectiveness of executive functions (EFs) training, both in computer‐based and school‐based formats. However, there is limited research on the combined effects of these training modalities. This study aims to assess the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of an EFs training programme for primary school children. The programme includes computerized training sessions for home use and school activities with metacognitive elements. The study included a sample of 53 second‐grade children, with 21 children in the training group and 32 children in the control group. Feasibility questionnaires were completed by children, parents and teachers. The children also underwent an EFs evaluation. The results indicate that the training was enjoyable for children and feasible for parents and teachers. Furthermore, preliminary efficacy analysis revealed significant improvements in working memory. These findings suggest that the training model holds promise for enhancing EFs in children in the school context. Practitioner notesWhat is already known about this topic Individual differences in executive functions influence acquisitions, behaviours and competencies in several specific domains from infancy to adulthood. Enhancing executive functions during school‐age years can contribute to reducing or preventing academic, behavioural and social difficulties. Among interventions targeting executive functions in school‐aged children, school‐based interventions have shown the highest effectiveness, followed by metacognitive interventions and computer‐based interventions. What this paper adds This paper presents the implementation of an innovative school‐based training programme designed to improve executive functions (EFs). The programme combines metacognitive sessions conducted at school with computer‐based sessions carried out at home. The goal was to enhance the effectiveness and generalizability of the training. The training programme was found to be enjoyable for children and feasible for both parents and teachers. Preliminary efficacy data indicate promising results, suggesting that the training programme is effective in achieving its intended goals. Implications for practice and/or policy Integrating school‐based metacognitive training with computerized sessions delivered at home can provide a high‐intensity training programme that may not be achievable in the school context alone. The school activities, conducted in group settings with teachers and peers, were found to be the most appreciated by the children, indicating that computer sessions alone cannot replace the value of metacognitive sessions at school, within a meaningful social context for the child. It is crucial to actively involve families in the training process to ensure good adherence. Additionally, the availability of technological resources in each family should be evaluated before implementing the training programme.

Preclinical evaluation and first-in-dog clinical trials of PBMC-expanded natural killer cells for adoptive immunotherapy in dogs with cancer

BackgroundNatural killer (NK) cells are cytotoxic cells capable of recognizing heterogeneous cancer targets without prior sensitization, making them promising prospects for use in cellular immunotherapy. Companion dogs develop spontaneous cancers...

Preliminary Efficacy and Safety Data from the Phase 2 Trial of Riliprubart (SAR445088), a Humanized Monoclonal Antibody Targeting Complement C1s, in Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy (CIDP) (S15.008)

Preliminary Efficacy and Safety Data from the Phase 2 Trial of Riliprubart (SAR445088), a Humanized Monoclonal Antibody Targeting Complement C1s, in Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy (CIDP) (S15.008)

Abstract CT224: Preliminary efficacy and safety results from the (TATCIST) trial: A PSMA-directed targeted alpha therapy with FPI-2265 (225Ac-PSMA-I&amp;T) for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)

Abstract INTRODUCTION: Targeted α therapy (TAT) in mCRPC is a rapidly advancing class of radiotherapeutics that can effectively deliver potent and local radiation selectively to cancer cells while sparing the surrounding normal cells. Retrospective studies of 225Ac PSMA-RLT (radioligand therapy), have shown promise in pts with mCRPC, where activity correlates with disease characteristics and prior therapies. FPI-2265 (225Ac-PSMA-I&amp;T) consists of a small-molecule PSMA-targeting ligand coupled with a 225Ac radionuclide. Here we present the initial results from TATCIST, an ongoing, open-label, single-arm study (NCT05219500) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FPI-2265 in pts with mCRPC that was initiated as an investigator-sponsored study then converted into an industry-sponsored trial with more stringent eligibility criteria. METHODS: Eligible pts are required to have progressive mCRPC with PSMA-positive PET. Prior radioligand therapy is permitted. Pts with skeletal metastases presenting as a superscan were excluded upon protocol amendment and excluded from this analysis. Four doses of FPI-2265 at 100 kBq/kg (±10%) are administered at 8-week intervals; de-escalation in cycle 2 and beyond is allowed. Proportion of pts with PSA ≤50%, maximum %PSA decrease, and safety and tolerability of FPI-2265 were assessed. RESULTS: At the time of the data cut (30Jan2024) 30 pts have received ≥1 dose FPI-2265, with 25 pts having ≥12 weeks follow up. For this analysis, 21 pts were evaluable for safety and 20 pts were evaluable for PSA response: 4 pts with superscan were excluded and 1 pt was excluded due to uninterpretable PSA data. In general, pts were heavily pretreated in terms of prior lines of therapy. Most pts (17/21 [81%]) had received a prior taxane, including 8 pts who received ≥2 lines of taxanes. Eight pts received prior 177Lu PSMA-RLT (Lu). PSA50 was achieved in 10/20 pts (50%); In a subset of pts with the baseline PSMA SUVmean &amp;gt;6 (n=13 overall; post-Lu, n=6), PSA50 was achieved in 9 pts (69%). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) included dry mouth (18/21 [86%]), fatigue (10/21 [48%]) dry eye (6/21 [28%]), and anemia (6/21 [28%]). All were Grade 1-2 in severity, expect anemia Grade 3 which was observed in (5/21 [24%]). Other Grade 3 TRAEs included decreased platelet count (3/21 [14%]). No Grade 4 or 5 TRAEs were reported. Dry mouth was primarily Grade 1 (13/21 [62%]) with only 5 patients (24%) experiencing Grade 2 dry mouth; there were no related discontinuations. CONCLUSION: Preliminary efficacy and safety data as of 30Jan24 suggest that FPI-2265 is active in heavily pretreated pts with progressive mCRPC, including pts who received prior Lu therapy. Higher PSMA SUVmean was associated with improved PSA responses, Safety and tolerability were consistent with other published studies of 225Ac-PSMA-RLTs. These initial results support further investigation of FPI-2265 and a new phase 2/3 trial will begin enrolling soon. Citation Format: Ebrahim S. Delpassand, Mohammad Jawed Hashmi, Julia Kazakin, Omer Nawaz, Gabriella Garufi, Joanne Schindler, Luke Nordquist. Preliminary efficacy and safety results from the (TATCIST) trial: A PSMA-directed targeted alpha therapy with FPI-2265 (225Ac-PSMA-I&amp;T) for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(7_Suppl):Abstract nr CT224.

Abstract CT118: Phase I dose escalation of ASKC202, a novel cMET tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors

Abstract Background ASKC202 is an oral and highly selective small molecule inhibitor which inhibits mesenchymal-epithelial transition. We report preliminary safety and efficacy data from an ongoing Phase I, FIH, dose-escalation study of ASKC202 in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors (NCT05306132). Methods A two-part study was initiated to evaluate MTD, safety and tolerability, pharmacokinetics and preliminary antitumor activity of ASKC202, including dose escalation study (Part A) and dose expansion study (Part B). Responses were assessed per RECIST 1.1 every 2 cycles (6 weeks). AEs were graded using CTCAE v5.0.In Part A, dose escalation followed the accelerated titration combined with the "3+3" design. Patients with heavily pre-treated solid tumors received ASKC202 orally at doses of 50, 150, 300, 450 and 600 mg/day once daily. The treatment continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or treatment termination. If the subject in the 50mg dose group developed DLT, the dose group was switched to a "3+3" design. Results As of November 30, 2023, 16 patients who are refractory or don’t respond to standard therapy were available received ASKC202 (50mg: N=1; 150mg: N=3; 300mg: N=6; 450mg: N=3; 600mg: N=3). 15/16 pts had pathological confirmation of non-small-cell lung cancer (except for 1 case of PSC). 8/16 pts had brain metastasis. 10/16 pts had cMET dysregulation including MET amplification (N=9; gene copy number 1.3-8.3) and MET missense mutation (N=1; p.S186L) with no patient having Exon 14 skipping mutation.ASKC202 was well-tolerated in all patients. No dose-limiting toxicity was observed in all dose levels (50 to 600 mg). The common TRAEs occurring in more than 20% of patients included: anemia (5/16), blood glucose elevation (5/16), ALT elevation (4/16), AST elevation (4/16) and peripheral edema (4/16). Grade 3 TRAEs were only observed in one patient (300mg QD), including anemia and hypokalemia. Among 14pts who had at least one post-baseline anti-tumor assessment, 5 pts achieved a confirmed partial response. The confirmed ORR is 35.7%. The median best percentage change in target lesion size from baseline (depth of response) was 51.8% and 3pts had duration of tumor response ≥ 6 months. ORR and DCR for patients with cMET alteration (N=8) was 62.5% (5/8) and 75.0% (6/8) respectively. One subject (150mg QD) with MET missense mutation (p.S186L) had a 67% tumor reduction in intracranial lesion from baseline. Exposure of ASKC202 increased dose-proportionally at dose range 50mg to 300mg, but less than dose-proportionally increased at 300mg to 600mg. Conclusions ASKC202 monotherapy was well-tolerated with manageable safety profile and showed anti-tumor signal and the central nervous system efficacy. Citation Format: Tingting Song, Caicun Zhou, Wei Li, Xingya Li, Lin Wu, Shan Zeng, Liyun Miao, Baogang Liu, Xuyu Wei, Jing Chen, Luwei Han. Phase I dose escalation of ASKC202, a novel cMET tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(7_Suppl):Abstract nr CT118.

Your Body Is Your Home: The feasibility of an intuitive eating intervention for early adolescents.

Intuitive eating (IE) is an emerging health promotion framework which has shown promise in the prevention and early intervention of disordered eating (DE) behavior in adults. This study sought to extend this work by assessing the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a 5-week IE intervention, "Your Body is Your Home," delivered in school classrooms for early adolescents aged 11-13. The present study utilized a quasi-experimental design. Eligibility criteria were defined a priori and published in a registered protocol. Four classrooms (n = 128 student participants) were recruited into two streams, and self-report questionnaires were administered at pre-test, post-test, and 4-week follow-up. The questionnaires included the Intuitive Eating Scale for Early Adolescents (IES-2-EA), the Body Appreciation Scale (BAS-2), and the WHO Wellbeing Index (WHO-5). Linear mixed models were used to conduct preliminary efficacy testing. The results indicate that a brief classroom-based IE intervention is feasible and acceptable for both students and teaching staff; retention, fidelity, and attendance targets were achieved. Students and teachers rated all five sessions of the intervention as a highly feasible method of health promotion. Further, preliminary efficacy data suggest IE interventions aimed at early adolescents may be a feasible way of improving certain aspects of IE (p < .001) in male and female participants, and body appreciation (p < .001) in male participants. The study provides preliminary support for the implementation and evaluation of an IE intervention as part of school-based health promotion and offers preliminary effect size estimates for a larger-scale randomized trial. Existing evidence suggests that IE may be a useful framework through which relationships with food and the body can be improved. The present study seeks to extend this work by adapting the framework for early adolescents (among whom the framework is not well understood) and examining feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary changes to several health and well-being metrics following a 5-week school-based intervention.

(112) Efficacy and Safety of Platelet-Rich Plasma Injections for Peyronie’s Disease: A Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Cross-Over Study

Abstract Introduction Peyronie's Disease (PD) is currently treated with intralesional collagenase injection, the only FDA-approved medical therapy. Platelet-derived therapies, such as autologous platelet rich plasma (PRP), have shown potential in tissue regeneration. We are investigating the safety and efficacy of PRP in PD with an ongoing randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study. Objective The objective of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) treatment in Peyronie's Disease (PD) through a randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover trial. Methods We analyzed data from an ongoing trial conducted between April 2021 and June 2023. Men with PD (write degrees/dorsal only etc) were randomly assigned to receive two 0.5 ml injections of PRP obtained using an autologous platelet separator (Arthrex Angel, Arthrex Inc.) or placebo directly into the dominant plaque, with a two-week interval between injections. Immediate post-procedure assessments included Visual Analogue Pain Scale, and follow-up evaluations focused on identifying complications. After three months, participants crossed over to the other treatment arm for two additional injections. Goniometer measurement assessments were performed prior to each crossover (NCT04512287). Related Samples Wilcoxon-Signed Rank test was used for dependent repeated groups, the serial measurements of degree of curvature at different time points for each patient within a specific group. Findings at p&amp;lt; 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results The analysis includes data from 29 men who completed all injections and the 6-month follow-up. No minor or major adverse events, such as penile bruising, swelling, edema, allergy, or penile fracture, were reported. Regarding efficacy, we observed a significant reduction in curvature after six months compared to baseline. The pretreatment median curvature was 40.0 (IQR: 15), the median post-treatment curvature 30.0 (IQR: 30) (p=0.014). Furthermore, we did not observe worsening of curvature in subsequent evaluations. Conclusions Our findings from our ongoing clinical trial suggest that PRP treatment for Peyronie's Disease is safe, with minimal adverse events reported. The preliminary efficacy data indicates a significant reduction in curvature after 2 injections each of placebo and PRP treatment compared to baseline. Nevertheless, study completion is necessary prior to reporting true efficacy data comparing PRP vs placebo. Disclosure No.

The efficacy and safety of tinengotinib in patients with heavily pretreated metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

133 Background: Tinengotinib is a spectrum-selective multi-kinase inhibitor that targets cell proliferation, angiogenesis, and immune-oncology pathways by inhibiting Aurora kinases A/B, Janus kinases (JAK), and receptor tyrosine kinases (FGFRs, VEGFRs). It has been reported that the activation of JAK/STAT and fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) signaling drives prostate tumor plasticity. Here we present the preliminary safety and efficacy data of tinengotinib in patients with mCRPC from three early phase clinical trials conducted in the US and China. Methods: Eligible mCRPC patients who have no available standard therapeutic treatment options were enrolled to the three studies. Tinengotinib was given as monotherapy at 8 mg QD, 10 mg QD and 12 mg QD. Efficacy tumor assessments were based on RECIST v1.1 for measurable disease and Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 criteria for non-measurable (bone) disease. PSA50 response was also evaluated. CTCAE v5.0 was used for safety assessments. Results: As of 28AUG2023, 30 patients with mCRPC were treated at dose levels of 8 mg QD (n=1), 10 mg QD (n=19) and 12 mg QD (n=10). Median age was 67 years (range 52-82) with ECOG performance status of 1 in 93% of patients. All patients had at least 2 prior therapies including 77% prior docetaxel, 87% prior abiraterone, and 30% prior enzalutamide. The median follow-up time is 5.4 months. Twenty-two (22) patients were efficacy evaluable, of which 13 were evaluable per RECIST v1.1. Fourteen (14) patients were PSA evaluable. The median radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) was 5.6 months (95% CI, 3.3-7.3). Overall response rate (ORR) was 46% (6/13) and the disease control rate (DCR) was 85% (11/13). Median duration of response (DoR) was 3.0 months. The PSA50 response rate was 50% (7/14). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 28 patients (93%). The most common TRAEs (≥20%) included blood thyroid stimulating hormone increase (43%), anemia (37%), hypertension (27%), aspartate aminotransferase increase (23%), electrocardiogram QT prolongation (20%) and white blood cell count decrease (20%). Conclusions: Tinengotinib safety profile was tolerable and manageable. The preliminary efficacy data showed promising clinical benefit of tinengotinib monotherapy in patients with heavily pretreated mCRPC. Further study of tinengotinib in this disease is warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT03654547 , NCT04742959 , NCT05253053 .

Phase Ib trial of erdafitinib (E) combined with enfortumab vedotin (EV) following platinum and PD-1/L1 inhibitors for metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) with FGFR2/3 genetic alterations (GAs).

625 Background: Erdafitinib (E) is a treatment option in mUCpatients with somatic FGFR2/3 GAs after progression on platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC). Enfortumab Vedotin (EV) is approved as a single agent to treat mUC patients following prior PBC and PD1/L1 inhibitors or as second-line therapy for cisplatin-ineligible patients. Retrospective studies suggest that the activity of EV is not compromised by FGFR2/3 GAs. E and EV have different mechanisms of activity, and toxicities are mostly non-overlapping. Hence, there is rationale to evaluate the feasibility of combination E + EV, to overcome the difficulties of resistance and sequencing agents in mUC patients with FGFR2/3 GAs. Methods: This is an ongoing, single arm, multicenter, dose-escalation and expansion study of combination E + EV evaluating the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and antitumor activity in patients with mUC harboring somatic FGFR2/3 GAs who have progressed after PBC and/or PD1/L1 inhibitor therapies. Dose escalation phase aims to identify the maximum tolerable dose and recommended phase 2 dose of EV at dose levels of 1 mg/kg and 1.25 mg/kg in combination with E at 8 mg/day as shown in the table. Preliminary safety, PK, and efficacy data for Dose Level (DL) 1 and 2 are presented in this abstract. Results: As of data cutoff, based on 3+3 design, total 8 patients are enrolled and finished dose limiting toxicity (DLT) period (1st cycle). Six patients were enrolled in DL1 with 1 DLT (skin rash) and 2 patients in DL2. The most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) included hyperphosphatemia (88%), mucositis (88%), hypercalcemia (75%), high AST (75%), hand foot syndrome (75%), peripheral neuropathy (75%), alopecia (63%), diarrhea (63%), hypoalbuminemia (63%) and hypomagnesemia (63%). Grade 3 TRAE included hand foot syndrome (50%), anemia (17%), rash (17%), anorexia (17%) and paronychia (17%). One patient developed grade 4 Stevens-Johnson syndrome related to EV which subsequently improved. PK data are available for all 6 subjects in DL1. The average steady-state Cmin of E and monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE) was 1430 ± 639 ng/mL and 1.4 ± 0.9 ng/mL, respectively, and the average Cmax of MMAE was 3.9 ± 0.9 ng/mL at DL1. All 8 patients are evaluable for response, and best response is partial response in all. Detailed safety and additional efficacy data will be presented. Conclusions: Combination E + EV is feasible and preliminarily exhibits antitumor activity. Dose escalation is ongoing to identify the MTD or recommended dose for expansion of the trial. Clinical trial information: NCT04963153 . [Table: see text]