Preimplantation Genetic Testing For Aneuploidy Research Articles

Assessing the clinical value of day 7 blastocysts: a predictive model for preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) cycles.

To identify the benefit of extending embryo culture until day (D)7 based on patients and cycle characteristics. A retrospective cohort study was conducted including 25,120 blastocysts from 5278 PGT-A autologous cycles between 2017 and 2022. A theoretical cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) was calculated by binomial density function. An increase of ≥ 5% in theoretical CLBR was considered a tangible benefit when obtaining ≥ 1 euploid D7 blastocyst and ≤ 3 euploid blastocysts from D5/D6. A predictive model was built considering the number of embryos eligible for extended culture until D7, number of blastocysts already biopsied on D5/D6, and patient's age. Euploidy rates decreased for blastocysts biopsied on D5, D6, and D7 (55.6%, 39.7%, and 27.1%, P < 0.001, respectively). The probability of tangible benefit was increased with more embryos available for extended culture until D7, was decreased with higher D5/D6 blastocysts already biopsied and for older patients. The overall AUC of the final model in the validation sets was 0.75 (95% CI 0.72-0.78). Based on the predictive model, in poor cycles (< 1% tangible benefit), the benefit rate from extended culture was 0.3% and for moderate, good, and best cycles (1-10%, 10-20%, and ≥ 20% tangible benefit) were 4.4%, 14.0%, and 29.3%, respectively. An application of the predictive model is available online for external testing: https://artfertilityclinics.shinyapps.io/WET-D7/ . The predictive model provides a decision-making tool to objectively identify cycles that would benefit from extending embryo culture until D7.

Oocyte maturity rate is an age-independent predictor of blastocyst development and euploidy rates: a multicenter retrospective study

Research Question Can oocyte maturity rate predict blastocyst development and euploidy rates independently of patient age? Design A multicenter retrospective study including 1547 consecutive women undergoing first in-vitro fertilization cycle of oocyte retrieval-intracytoplasmic sperm injection with preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (IVF/ICSI/PGT-A). Both centers used the same PGT lab for PGT-A testing. Oocyte maturity rate as a predictor for cycle outcomes of blastocyst development and euploidy rates was analyzed by Poisson regression model, after controlling for other known confounders. Results Oocyte maturity rate is positively correlated with blastocyst development rate and euploidy rate after controlling for patient age at cycle start, BMI, AMH levels, total FSH dosage, number of days of ovarian stimulation, and peak estradiol level (p&lt;0.01). Conclusion This study demonstrated that oocyte maturity rate can predict blastocyst development and euploidy rates independently of other confounding factors including patient age. This finding suggests that oocyte maturity rate may serve as an important biomarker for oocyte quality. This can be used by physicians to evaluate and improve the efficacy of ovarian stimulation regimens for IVF. This may further enhance artificial intelligence (AI) capabilities in optimizing ovarian stimulation protocols and outcomes of Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART).

Comparative study on pregnancy complications: PGT-A vs. IVF-ET with gender-specific outcomes

The safety and clinical effectiveness of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) in improving pregnancy outcomes for sub-fertile patients remains controversial. Potential sex-based differences in the relationship between PGT-A and pregnancy complications have not been investigated, which could guide the appropriate clinical application of PGT-A. In this secondary analysis of data from a multicenter, randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial (NCT03118141), 940 women who achieved singleton live birth during the trial were included to estimate the between-group differences in pregnancy complications following PGT-A versus conventional in vitro fertilization (IVF) vary with fetal sex. Logistic regression analysis was used to adjust for possible confounders, and subgroup analysis was also performed. Among male fetuses, the risk of maternal preeclampsia was significantly lower after PGT-A compared to conventional IVF treatment (3.37% vs. 7.88%; adjusted OR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.17-0.92; P = 0.032). However, this protective effect was not observed in pregnancies with female fetuses (3.63% vs. 3.38%; adjusted OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.36-3.00; P = 0.937). In addition, no significant sex-dependent differences in the risks of other pregnancy complications or neonatal outcomes were detected between PGT-A and conventional IVF groups (P &amp;gt; 0.05). In summary, PGT-A was associated with a decreased risk of maternal preeclampsia in singleton pregnancies with male fetuses, highlighting its potential utility in preeclampsia prevention in addition to spontaneous abortion rate reduction.

Parental Balanced Translocation Carriers do not have Decreased Usable Blastulation Rates or Live Birth Rates Compared to Infertile Controls.

To determine if translocation carriers have a reduced number of usable blastocysts compared to infertile controls. Retrospective cohort study. All cycles of balanced translocation carriers undergoing IVF with preimplantation genetic testing (PGT-SR) for structural rearrangements at a single infertility center compared to an age-matched control cycles of infertile patients undergoing preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) from January 2012-August 2022. Balanced translocation carriers. Primary outcome measures were blastulation rate, usable blastulation rates and live birth rate. Secondary outcome measures were sustained implantation rate, fertilization rate, number of oocytes retrieved, number of metaphase II oocytes, total blastulation failure, number of 2 pronuclear embryos, and number of euploid embryos. Outcome measures were compared between male translocation carriers and controls, female translocation carriers and controls, and Robertsonian versus reciprocal translocation carriers. A total of 1,291 retrieval cycles from 993 patients were included, of which 255 patients were translocation carriers, while 738 were controls. Of those with translocations, 30 (11.5%) were Robertsonian and 231 (88.5%) were reciprocal carriers. There was a statistically significant difference in the blastulation rate between carriers and controls (59.5% versus 62.1%; p-value = 0.01). However, usable blastulation rates (47.2% versus 50.0%) were equivalent between groups. There were no differences in number of oocytes retrieved (18.5 versus 18.3), number of 2 pronuclear embryos (13.4 versus 12.5), sustained implantation rate (71.4% versus 75.1%) or live birth rate (63.0% versus 66.1%) between translocation carriers and controls. In both male and female translocation carriers versus controls, there were no differences in usable blastulation rates or live birth rates. When comparing Robertsonian with reciprocal translocation carriers, rates of blastulation, usable blastulation, sustained implantation, and live birth rate were equivalent. Despite fewer euploid embryos, there were no differences in rates of usable blastulation or live birth rates in balanced translocation carriers, regardless of sex of affected partner or type of rearrangement, compared to controls. Routine karyotyping for blastulation failure may not be necessary based on these findings.

Non-invasive prediction of human embryonic ploidy using artificial intelligence: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Embryonic ploidy is critical for the success of embryo transfer. Currently, preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) is the gold standard for detecting ploidy abnormalities. However, PGT-A has several inherent limitations, including invasive biopsy, high economic burden, and ethical constraints. This paper provides the first comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of the performance of artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms using embryonic images for non-invasive prediction of embryonic ploidy. Comprehensive searches of studies that developed or utilized AI algorithms to predict embryonic ploidy from embryonic imaging, published up until August 10, 2024, across PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, IEEE, SCOPUS, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were performed. Studies with prospective or retrospective designs were included without language restrictions. The summary receiver operating characteristic curve, along with pooled sensitivity and specificity, was estimated using a bivariate random-effects model. The risk of bias and study quality were evaluated using the QUADAS-AI tool. Heterogeneity was quantified using the inconsistency index (I 2 ), derived from Cochran's Q test. Predefined subgroup analyses and bivariate meta-regression were conducted to explore potential sources of heterogeneity. This study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024500409). Twenty eligible studies were identified, with twelve studies included in the meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve of AI for predicting embryonic euploidy were 0.71 (95% CI: 0.59-0.81), 0.75 (95% CI: 0.69-0.80), and 0.80 (95% CI: 0.76-0.83), respectively, based on a total of 6879 embryos (3110 euploid and 3769 aneuploid). Meta-regression and subgroup analyses identified the type of AI-driven decision support system, external validation, risk of bias, and year of publication as the primary contributors to the observed heterogeneity. There was no evidence of publication bias. Our findings indicate that AI algorithms exhibit promising performance in predicting embryonic euploidy based on embryonic imaging. Although the current AI models developed cannot entirely replace invasive methods for determining embryo ploidy, AI demonstrates promise as an auxiliary decision-making tool for embryo selection, particularly for individuals who are unable to undergo PGT-A. To enhance the quality of future research, it is essential to overcome the specific challenges and limitations associated with AI studies in reproductive medicine. This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2022YFC2702905), the Shengjing Freelance Researcher Plan of Shengjing Hospital and the 345 talent project of Shengjing Hospital.

Outcomes for Female Physicians Compared With Nonphysicians After Assisted Reproductive Technology.

To evaluate outcomes of female physicians after assisted reproductive technology (ART). We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from 248 physician patients and 3,470 nonphysician patients who underwent a total of 10,095 fresh or frozen ART cycles at a single academic center in an insurance-mandated state between January 2015 and March 2022. The primary outcome was live-birth rate. The secondary outcomes were implantation rate, early pregnancy loss rate, and time to pregnancy. Models were adjusted for confounders where appropriate. Both groups were similar in age (mean physician age 36.29 years; mean nonphysician age 35.96 years, P=.35). Physicians had lower body mass index (BMI) (mean physician BMI 23.51, mean nonphysician BMI 26.37, P<.01), and a higher proportion were diagnosed with unexplained infertility (physician 33.9%, nonphysician 25.9%, P<.01) and used preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (physician 21.5%, nonphysician 12.7%). Physicians and nonphysicians had similar live-birth rates (physician 39.3%, nonphysician 38.2%; adjusted relative risk [aRR] 1.01 95% CI, 0.91-1.13), implantation rates (physician 34.7%, nonphysician 33.7%; relative risk 1.03 95% CI, 0.94-1.14), and early pregnancy loss rates (physician 21.9%, nonphysician 19.8%; aRR 1.18 95% CI, 0.99-1.41) per transfer. Physicians had a shorter time from initial ART cycle to pregnancy (physician 21.82 weeks, nonphysician 25.16 weeks; aRR 0.86, 95% CI, 0.83-0.89). There was no difference between female physicians and nonphysicians in assisted reproduction cycle outcomes. Physicians become pregnant slightly faster than nonphysicians.

Two-year cumulative live-birth rates and maximum number of transfer cycles in women aged ≥ 40 years

This retrospective study aimed to clarify the cumulative live-birth rates (CLBRs) and cost per live-birth (LB) to evaluate the validity of frozen–thawed embryo transfer without preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) in women aged ≥ 40 years. The study included 1,011 patients aged ≥ 40 years who underwent their first oocyte retrieval at our hospital between January 2010 and September 2017. They were followed up for up to two years or until either treatment discontinuation or a pregnancy that resulted in a live birth. The 2-year CLBRs were 55.6%, 39.0%, 31.3%, 19.1%, 10.6%, 4.4%, and 0% for patients aged 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, and > 46 years, respectively. In approximately 80% of LB cases, patients aged 40–42 years and 43–44 years became pregnant by the fourth and second transfers, respectively. Costs per LB were $30,207, $49,034, $66,345, $102,759, and $195,862 for patients aged 40, 41, 42, 43, and 44, respectively. Cost per LB for each number of transfers reached $300,000 and $ 450,000 for the third transfer at 42 and 43 years of age, respectively. For cost-effectiveness, up to two ET cycles are recommended for patients aged 42–43, and none for patients aged ≥ 44 years.

Comparative Analysis of Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization and Next-Generation Sequencing in Sperm Evaluation: Implications for Preimplantation Genetic Testing and Male Infertility.

Pre-implantation genetic testing (PGT) is a crucial process for selecting embryos created through assisted reproductive technology (ART). Couples with chromosomal rearrangements, infertility, recurrent miscarriages, advanced maternal age, known single-gene disorders, a family history of genetic conditions, previously affected pregnancies, poor embryo quality, or congenital anomalies may be candidates for PGT. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A) enables the selection and transfer of euploid embryos, significantly enhancing implantation rates in assisted reproduction. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is the preferred method for analyzing biopsied cells to identify these abnormalities. While FISH is a well-established method for identifying sperm aneuploidy, NGS offers a more comprehensive assessment of genetic material, potentially enhancing our understanding of male infertility. Chromosomal abnormalities, arising during meiosis, can lead to aneuploid sperm, which may hinder embryo implantation and increase miscarriage rates. This review provides a comparative analysis of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and next-generation sequencing (NGS) in sperm evaluations, focusing on their implications for preimplantation genetic testing. This analysis explores the strengths and limitations of FISH and NGS, aiming to elucidate their roles in improving ART outcomes and reducing the risk of genetic disorders in offspring. Ultimately, the findings will inform best practices in sperm evaluations and preimplantation genetic testing strategies.

Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy (PGT-A) in In-Vitro Fertilisation (IVF) Treatment: Study Protocol for Pilot Phase of a Randomised Controlled Trial.

Introduction: Poor outcomes following IVF treatments are speculated to be due to the transfer of aneuploid embryos that cannot be identified based on morphological evaluation alone. This leads to patients requiring numerous embryo transfers and, consequently, a prolonged time interval before live birth. Embryo selection following preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) with next-generation sequencing (NGS) has been suggested as an intervention to shorten time to pregnancy in women undergoing in vitro fertilisation (IVF). Past studies assessing the clinical efficacy of PGT-A in improving clinical outcomes have been conflicting and the associated clinical pregnancy rates and live birth rates following the transfer of a mosaic embryos have yet to be determined. None of the existing studies solely included women of advanced reproductive age (ARA). The pilot study and proposed RCT will determine if, compared to morphological evaluation alone, the use of PGT-A through NGS is a more clinically effective, safer, and more cost-effective way to provide IVF treatment in women of advanced reproductive age. Method and Analysis: The proposed pilot study will aim to randomise 100 patients within a single-centre study to evaluate recruitment, randomisation, and adherence to study protocol and allocated trail arms by participating patients. The results of the pilot study will enable us to determine the sample size for a larger study to establish the effectiveness of PGT-A in ARA women. Ethics and Dissemination: The study (Integrated Research Application System Number 236067) received approval from the Health Research Authority and Health and Care Research Wales (HCRW) and the East Midlands-Leicester South Research Ethics Committee (20/EM/0290). The results will be made available to patients, the funders, the Reproductive Medicine societies, and other researchers. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05009745, n.

Multi-omics PGT: re-evaluation of euploid blastocysts for implantation potential based on RNA sequencing.

In addition to chromosomal euploidy, can the transcriptome of blastocysts be used as a novel predictor of embryo implantation potential? This retrospective analysis showed that based on differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between euploid blastocysts which resulted and did not result in a clinical pregnancy, machine learning models could help improve implantation rates by blastocyst optimization. Embryo implantation is a multifaceted process, with implantation loss and pregnancy failure related not only to blastocyst euploidy but also to the intricate dialog between blastocyst and endometrium. Although in vitro studies have revealed the characteristics of trophectoderm (TE) differentiation in implanted blastocysts and the function of TE placentation at the implantation site, the precise molecular mechanisms of embryo implantation and their clinical application remain to be fully elucidated. This study involved 102 patients who underwent 111 cycles for preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A) between March 2022 and July 2023. The study included 412 blastocysts biopsied at Day 5 [D5] or Day 6 [D6] for patients who underwent PGT-A. The biopsy lysates were split and subjected to DNA and RNA sequencing (DNA- and RNA-seq). One part was used for PGT-A to detect DNA copy number variations, whereas the other part was assessed simultaneously by RNA-seq to determine the transcriptome characteristics. To validate the reliability and accuracy of RNA-seq obtained from this strategy, we initially analyzed the transcriptome of blastocysts with chromosomal aneuploidies. Subsequently, we compared the transcriptomic features of blastocysts with different rates of formation (D5 vs D6) and investigated the network of interactions between key blastulation genes and the receptive endometrium. Then to evaluate the implantation potential of euploid blastocysts, we identified DEGs between euploid blastocysts that resulted in clinical pregnancy (defined as the presence of a gestational sac detected by ultrasound after 5 weeks) and those that did not. These DEGs were then employed to construct a predictive model for optimizing blastocyst selection. The successful detection rate of PGT-A was remarkably high at 99.8%. The RNA data may infer aneuploidy for both trisomy and monosomy. Between the euploid blastocysts that formed on D5 and D6, 187 DEGs were predominantly involved in cell differentiation for embryonic placenta development, the PPAR signaling pathway, and the Notch signaling pathway. These D5/D6 DEGs also exhibited a functional dialog with the receptive phase endometrium-specific genes through protein-protein interaction networks, indicating that the embryo undergoes further differentiation for post-implantation development. Furthermore, a modeling strategy using 280 DEGs between blastocysts leading to successful clinical pregnancies or failing to produce clinical pregnancies was implemented to refine the euploid embryo optimization, achieving areas under the curves of 0.88, 0.71, and 0.84 for the random forest (RF), support vector machine, and linear discriminant analysis models, respectively. Finally, a retrospective analysis of 83 transferred euploid blastocysts using the RF model identified three types of euploid embryos with a decreasing trend in implantation potential. Notably, the implantation rate of the good group was significantly higher than that of the moderate group (88.6% vs 50.0% P = 0.001) and that of the moderate group was higher than that of the poor group (50.0% vs 20.8%, P = 0.035). The sample size was insufficient; thus, a prospective study is needed to verify the clinical effectiveness of the above model. Because we did not analyze blastocysts that led only to biochemical pregnancies but failed clinical pregnancies separately, our classification system still must be modified to screen these embryos. Transcriptomic analysis of blastocysts offers a novel approach for predicting embryo implantation potential, which can be utilized to optimize clinical embryo selection. The ranking system may be effective in reducing the times and costs involved in achieving a clinical pregnancy. This study was funded by the "Pioneer" and "Leading Goose" R&D Program of Zhejiang (No. 2023C03034), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82101709), and the National Key Research and Development Program for Young Scientists of China (No. 2022YFC2702300). The authors state no competing interests. N/A.

Impact of autologous mitochondrial transfer on obstetric and neonatal health of offspring: A small single-center case series

IntroductionA pilot study was carried out to test the efficacy of the autologous mitochondrial transfer therapy (AUGMENT) technique. No improvements in pregnancy rate, development, or embryo quality were observed in the AUGMENT-treated group versus the Control group in this study. The main objective of this research is to analyze whether AUGMENT technology did have any impact on the obstetric and perinatal outcomes of pregnancies and children resulting from treated oocytes. MethodsFollow up study of women with a livebirth who participated in a pilot randomized controlled trial in which sibling MII oocytes were randomly allocated to AUGMENT + intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) (AUGMENT group) or ICSI alone (control group). Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy was performed in both groups. Pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of 14 women (15 pregnancies) and their 18 children were analyzed. The information was retrieved by reviewing the medical records or through questionnaires sent to the patients. ResultsNo differences were found in this small case series between the AUGMENT and control groups regarding the rate of gestational complications, birth defects, gestational age at delivery (271.4 ± 12.56 vs 278 ± 10.4 days), birthweight (3.1 ± 0.6 kg vs. 3.1 ± 0.4 kg) and neonatal outcome. DiscussionThe few pregnancies achieved using AUGMENT oocyte therapy had similar outcomes than controls in this very small series. Our very preliminary data need to be confirmed in larger samples. The long term follow up of these children also needs to be analyzed.

The kinetics of nucleolar precursor bodies clustering at the pronuclei interface: Positive correlations with the morphokinetic characteristics of cleaving embryos and euploidy in preimplantation genetic testing programs

Objective: This study investigated potential relationships between the kinetics of nucleolar precursor bodies (NPBs) in the pronucleus and developmental morphokinetics and euploidy in human preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) cycles.Methods: The morphokinetic analysis of 200 blastocysts obtained from 53 PGT-A cycles was performed retrospectively in a time-lapse incubator. At the time of pronuclear breakdown (PNBD), we categorized the blastocysts into two groups based on the kinetic degree of clustering NPBs at the interface of the two pronuclei: clustered NPBs (CL) and non-clustered NPBs (NCL). We then compared morphokinetic parameters, abnormal behavioral events, and the rate of aneuploidy between the two groups.Results: Pronuclear fading and the first cleavage occurred earlier in the NCL group than in the CL group. However, the initiation of blastocyst formation and blastocyst expansion was delayed in the NCL group relative to the CL group. No differences were found in the rate of abnormal cleavage events, such as multinucleation at the 2-cell stage, direct cleavage from one to three cells, and from two to five cells between the CL and NCL groups. However, the fragmentation rate at the 8-cell stage was higher in the NCL group than in the CL group (10.3% vs. 1.9%, p&lt;0.05). Additionally, the euploid rate in the CL group was significantly higher than in the NCL group (37.9% vs. 12.4%, p&lt;0.05).Conclusion: These results demonstrate the effectiveness of combining NPB clustering at PNBD with morphokinetics as a parameter for selecting embryos with higher developmental potential in in vitro fertilization.

Healthy live births achieved from embryos diagnosed as non-mosaic segmental aneuploid.

To investigate pregnancy outcomes resulting from transfer of embryos with non-mosaic (NM) segmental aneuploid (SA) results following preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A). All patients who underwent frozen embryo transfer (FET) of at least one embryo with a NM-SA between March 2021 and April 2024 were retrospectively reviewed. Primary outcomes included live birth rate (LBR) and results of prenatal diagnosis. Embryos with NM-SA results were also compared to those with NM whole chromosome aneuploid (WCA) and mosaic SA results. Out of 25 NM-SA embryos transferred, the LBR was 24%. Prenatal diagnosis by amniocentesis and/or chorionic villus sampling was performed in 3/6 pregnancies, and results were normal. Embryos with duplications produced more live births compared to those with deletions. NM-SA embryos had a significantly higher ongoing pregnancy (OP)/LBR compared to embryos with NM-WCA results and a significantly lower OP/LBR compared to embryos with mosaic SA results; however, when compared to embryos with high-level SA mosaicism > 40%, the OP/LBR was not significantly different. Embryos with NM-SAs can result in euploid live births, albeit at reduced rates compared to those with mosaic SAs. These data can be used to aid in patient counseling about PGT-A results and embryo transfer decisions.

Comparison of live birth rates following the transfer of day-6 blastocysts on the 6th versus 7th day of progesterone exposure in hormone replacement treatment–frozen embryo transfer cycles

Objective: The duration of progesterone exposure is critical for establishing and maintaining a pregnancy in hormone replacement treatment (HRT)–frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles. This study compared the live birth rates (LBRs) of patients undergoing day-6 warmed blastocyst transfer on either the 6th or 7th day of progesterone administration in HRT-FET cycles.Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from the central registry of Indira IVF Hospital Private Limited. In total, 2,633 patients who underwent day-6 blastocyst transfer cycles with HRT-FET were identified. The cycles were categorized based on the timing of the day-6 blastocysts transfer: P+6 vs. P+7 (initiation date: P+1). Propensity scores were calculated. The primary outcome measure was the LBR.Results: Following propensity score matching, a total of 1,401 patients were included in the final analysis (P+6: n=1,212; P+7: n=189). The number of previous attempts was significantly higher in the P+6 group, whereas the rate of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy was significantly higher in the P+7 group. The LBRs were 59.2% and 54.5% in the P+6 and P+7 groups, respectively (p=0.21). Multivariate regression analysis revealed that the number of previous in vitro fertilization attempts (odds ratio [OR], 3.246; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.429 to 4.337; p&lt;0.001), the number of blastocysts transferred (OR, 2.011; 95% CI, 1.461 to 2.768; p&lt;0.01), and endometrial thickness on the day of progesterone initiation (OR, 1.143; 95% CI, 1.022 to 1.28; p=0.02) were independent predictors of live birth.Conclusions: The LBRs were comparable in patients who underwent day-6 warmed blastocyst transfer on day 6 or 7 post-progesterone initiation in HRT-FET cycles.

Impacts of double biopsy and double vitrification on the clinical outcomes following euploid blastocyst transfer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Compared to the 'single biopsy + single vitrification' approach, do 'double biopsy + double vitrification' or 'single biopsy + double vitrification' arrangements compromise subsequent clinical outcomes following euploidy blastocyst transfer? Both 'double biopsy + double vitrification' and 'single biopsy + double vitrification' led to reduced live birth/ongoing pregnancy rates and clinical pregnancy rates. It is not uncommon to receive inconclusive results following blastocyst biopsy and preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A). Often these blastocysts are warmed for re-test after a second biopsy, experiencing 'double biopsy + double vitrification'. Furthermore, to achieve better workflow, IVF laboratories may choose to routinely vitrify all blastocysts and schedule biopsy at a preferred timing, involving 'single biopsy + double vitrification'. However, in the current literature, there is a lack of systematic evaluation of both arrangements regarding their potential clinical risks in reference to the most common 'single biopsy + single vitrification' approach. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed, with the protocol registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023469143). A search in PUBMED, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library for relevant studies was carried out on 30 August 2023, using the keywords 'biopsy' and 'vitrification' and associated variations respectively. Only studies involving frozen transfers of PGT-A tested euploid blastocysts were included, with those involving PGT-M or PGT-SR excluded. Study groups included blastocysts having undergone 'double biopsy + double vitrification' or 'single biopsy + double vitrification', with a 'single biopsy + single vitrification' group used as control. The primary outcome was clinical pregnancy, while secondary outcomes included live birth/ongoing pregnancy, miscarriage, and post-warming survival rates. Random effects meta-analysis was performed with risk ratios (RR) and 95% CIs were used to present outcome comparisons. A total of 607 records were identified through the initial search and nine studies (six full articles and three abstracts) were eventually included. Compared to 'single biopsy + single vitrification', 'double biopsy + double vitrification' was associated with reduced clinical pregnancy rates (six studies, n = 18754; RR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.71-0.89; I2 = 0%) and live birth/ongoing pregnancy rates (seven studies, n = 20964; RR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.63-0.82; I2 = 0%). However, no significant changes were seen in miscarriage rates (seven studies, n = 22332; RR = 1.40, 95% CI = 0.92-2.11; I2 = 53%) and post-warming survival rates (three studies, n = 13562; RR = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.99-1.01; I2 = 0%) following 'double biopsy + double vitrification'. Furthermore, 'single biopsy + double vitrification' was also linked with decreased clinical pregnancy rates (six studies, n = 13284; RR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.76-0.92; I2 = 39%) and live birth/ongoing pregnancy rates (seven studies, n = 16800; RR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.69-0.91; I2 = 70%), and increased miscarriage rates (five studies, n = 15781; RR = 1.48, 95% CI = 1.31-1.67; I2 = 0%), but post-warming survival rates were not affected (three studies, n = 12452; RR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.97-1.01; I2 = 71%) by 'single biopsy + double vitrification'. All studies included in this meta-analysis were retrospective with varying levels of heterogeneity for different outcomes. Not all studies had accounted for potential confounding factors. Only one study reported neonatal outcomes. Our data indicated adverse impacts of 'double biopsy + double vitrification' and 'single biopsy + double vitrification' on clinical outcomes following euploid blastocyst transfers. Patients should be carefully consulted about the risks when offered such approaches. The biopsy process should be carried out as carefully and competently as possible to minimize an inconclusive diagnosis. R.W. is supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council Emerging Leadership Investigator Grant (2009767). There is no other external funding to report. All authors report no conflict of interest. CRD42023469143.

Feasibility of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy on frozen-thawed embryos following conventional IVF insemination.

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) is commonly employed in preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) to minimize the risk of foreign sperm DNA contamination. Cryopreserved embryos from patients with recurrent miscarriage or repeated implantation failure, who have undergone conventional in vitro fertilization (IVF), can be thawed and biopsied for PGT. Therefore, we aimed to assess the accuracy and effectiveness of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) on frozen embryos using conventional IVF (c-IVF) insemination methods. From January 2021 to November 2023, our center conducted 107 thawed cryopreserved embryo biopsy cycles to screen for PGT-A. Among them, 58 cycles used c-IVF insemination, and 49 used ICSI insemination. Basic patient clinical information, laboratory data, PGT test results, and clinical outcome data were collected. To minimize the confounding effects of patient characteristics and embryo quality on PGT-A outcomes, clinical outcomes, and contamination assessment, these variables were included in the analysis. We then evaluated the blastocyst euploidy rate, clinical outcomes, and accuracy of PGT-A results between the two groups and analyzed potential contamination in the c-IVF insemination group. A total of 320 blastocysts underwent PGT-A testing, with 179 blastocysts from c-IVF insemination and 141 from ICSI insemination. Considering participants' baseline characteristics and embryological outcomes, no significant differences were found between the two groups regarding infertility type, average age, body mass index, percentage of PGT-A indications, or quality of embryonic development. Regarding PGT-A results, all 320 biopsy samples were successfully analyzed, showing no statistical variance in chromosomal euploidy, abnormality, or mosaicism rates between the two insemination methods. No parental contamination was detected in the c-IVF insemination group. When assessing clinical outcomes, parameters such as biochemical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, and miscarriage rates did not exhibit significant discrepancies between the two groups, and no misdiagnoses were reported during the study period. Embryo transfer and PGT-A results are not affected by potential parental contamination in frozen-thawed embryos conceived via c-IVF. PGT-A guided embryo transfer in thawed embryos conceived by c-IVF is a viable and clinically effective approach.

The influence of trophectoderm biopsy for preimplantation genetic testing in the serum level of first trimester biomarkers: PAPP-a, βhCG and PIGF

Research questionDoes trophectoderm biopsy for preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A) affect maternal serum first trimester pregnancy biomarkers (PAPP- A, free β-hCG, PlGF)? DesignRetrospective cohort study, including all singleton pregnancies (n=9794) following either spontaneous conceived (SC) (n=8005) in vitro fertilization and fresh embryo transfers (IVF) (n=478) or frozen embryo transfer of non PGT-A (FET)(n=963) or PGT-A tested embryos (FET+PGT-A) (n=348). In all women with a viable pregnancy at 8-13.6 weeks of pregnancy, we measured serum levels of free β-hCG and PAPP-A . PlGF was measured in 3784 patients. These biomarkers were converted to a multiple of the expected normal median (MoM) for a pregnancy of the same gestational day. We calculated the medians for the multiple of the median and compared them. ResultsFree β-hCG did not differ according to the mode of conception. PAPP-A concentrations were significantly lower in in vitro fertilization and fresh embryo transfers (-0,1 Log10 MoM raw PAPP-A) when comparing to FET+PGT-A (-0,04 Log 10 MoM raw PAPP-A) and SC (-0,0187 Log 10 MoM raw PAPP-A) (p<0,05). PlGF levels were significantly lower in the FET+PGTA group (p<0.05). The difference in means adjusted by CRL was 4.6 pg/ml 95%CI [2.7-6.6] for SC, 3.5 pg/ml 95%CI [0.34-6.6] for IVF and 2.2 pg/ml 95%CI [0.06-4.4] for FET. ConclusionThis study demonstrates that trophectoderm biopsy for PGT-A has a significant impact on first trimester maternal serum PAPP-A and PIGF. This needs to be further validated since it may mislead the estimation of the first trimester risk of aneuploidies and preeclampsia.

Do sperm factors influence embryonic aneuploidy? Long live the oocyte.

What is the impact of male age- and sperm-related factors on embryonic aneuploidy? Using a 3-fold analysis framework encompassing patient-level, embryo-level, and matching analysis, we found no clinically significant interactions between male age and sperm quality with embryo ploidy. While the effect of maternal age on embryo chromosomal aneuploidy is well-established, the impact of male age and sperm quality on ploidy is less well-defined. This retrospective cohort study analyzed autologous preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) and frozen embryo transfer cycles from December 2014 to June 2021. The study involved 11087 cycles from 8484 patients, with a total of 35797 embryos. The aneuploidy rate, calculated as the ratio of aneuploid blastocysts to the total number of blastocysts biopsied in a single treatment cycle, was evaluated. In the embryo-level analysis, the main outcome measure was the ploidy state of the embryos. The study employed a multifaceted analytical approach that included a patient-level analysis using generalized linear mixed models, an embryo-level analysis focusing on chromosomal ploidy, and a propensity score matching analysis contrasting groups with distinct ploidy rates (0% and 100%). There were no interventions as this was an observational study of PGT-A cycles. No clinically relevant factors influencing ploidy rate related to male and sperm quality were revealed. In contrast, female age (coefficient = -0.053), BMI (coefficient = 0.003), prior ART cycle (coefficient = -0.066), and number of oocytes retrieved (coefficient = -0.018) were identified at the patient level. Embryo analysis identified age (coefficient = -0.1244) and ICSI usage (coefficient = -0.0129) as significant factors. Despite these, no significant interactions between male and female assessed factors on the ploidy rate emerged. Propensity score matching between maximal (100% vs 0%) euploid rates did not reveal significant differences of influence by male age and sperm quality. The focus on patients having blastocyst biopsy for PGT-A may not reflect the broader IVF population. Other semen quality parameters like DNA fragmentation were not included. Exclusion of embryo mosaicism from the analysis could affect aneuploidy rate interpretations. There may also be unmeasured influences like lifestyle or environmental factors. Male age and sperm quality parameters were consistent across both maximal and minimal ploidy rate comparisons. No significant clinical characteristics related to the factors assessed for the male-influenced blastocyst ploidy status, confirming the dominancy of the oocyte and female age. The study was not funded. There are no competing interests. N/A.

Perinatal Outcomes of Women with Recurrent Pregnancy Loss Undergoing Frozen Embryo Transfer from the Society of Assisted Reproductive Technology Database

To assess whether infants born to women with a history of recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) have an increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes following frozen embryo transfer (FET) compared to women without a history of infertility or RPL. Retrospective cohort study utilizing the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcomes Reporting System (SART CORS) database between 2014 and 2020. Patients in the SART CORS database who underwent their first FET resulting in live birth either with a diagnosis of RPL (cases n=3,299) or without a history of RPL or infertility, the comparison population being tubal ligation (TL) only (n=1408). Recurrent pregnancy loss MAIN OUTCOME: Low birthweight (<2500g), additional outcomes included gestational age (continuous), birthweight (continuous), preterm delivery (< 37 weeks), mode of delivery, and neonatal death, defined as death prior to the completion of the 28th day of life. We observed no statistically significant difference in low birthweight, birthweight overall, mode of delivery or risk of neonatal death between patients with RPL compared to women with tubal ligation who underwent their first FET resulting in live birth. Patients with history of RPL compared to TL utilizing FET were more likely to have a later gestational age at delivery (p<0.001). Patients with RPL were also less likely to have a preterm delivery (imputed AOR 0.75 [0.64, 0.89]) than the TL patients. Furthermore, performing preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGTA) in both patients with recurrent pregnancy loss or tubal ligation did not impact perinatal outcomes compared to patients who did not undergo PGTA. Patients with history of recurrent pregnancy loss do not have an increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes when they undergo FET compared to patients without infertility or recurrent pregnancy loss. In addition, performing IVF/PGTA in patients with RPL does not adversely impact birth outcomes of their infants.

Blastocysts originated from oocytes with smooth endoplasmic reticulum aggregates have a reduced euploidy rate: a retrospective cohort study.

Does the presence of smooth endoplasmic reticulum aggregates (SERa) in oocytes adversely impact the euploidy rate of subsequent blastocysts? We performed a retrospective cohort study with 671 young patients (< 38 years) undergoing their first preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) between January 2019 and October 2022 at a reproductive medical center of university affiliated teaching hospitals in China. Cycles were categorized as either SERa(+) cycles (containing at least one SERa(+) oocyte) or SERa(-) cycles (all oocytes without SERa). In SERa(+) cycles, oocytes were further subdivided into the SERa(+) oocyte group and the sibling SERa(-) oocyte group, comprising oocytes with normal morphology. No significant differences were observed in the normal fertilization rate (72.9% vs. 75.4% vs. 72.6%, P=0.343), and cleavage rate (96.8% vs. 97.1% vs. 96.4%, P=0.839) among the SERa(-) cycle group, the SERa(-) oocyte group, and the SERa(+) oocyte group. Additionally, there were no statistically significant differences in the rates of good quality embryos (44.7% vs. 48.8% vs. 46.2%, P=0.177) or blastocyst formation (60.1% vs. 60.9% vs. 60.5%, P=0.893) among the groups. However, the euploidy rate of blastocysts derived from SERa(+) oocytes was significantly lower compared to those from SERa(-) oocytes in SERa(+) cycles and normal oocytes in SERa(-) cycles (39.3% vs. 51.2% vs. 54.5%, P=0.005). Despite this, there were no significant differences in pregnancy and neonatal outcomes after euploid embryo transfer among the three groups. Blastocysts derived from SERa(+) oocytes have a lower euploidy rate than those derived from SERa(-) oocytes. Nevertheless, comparable reproductive outcomes were achieved following euploid embryo transfer from both SERa(+) and SERa(-) oocytes.