Prehabilitation Program Research Articles

STRIVE pilot trial: a protocol for a multicentre pragmatic internal pilot randomised controlled trial of Structured TRaining to Improve fitness in a Virtual Environment (STRIVE) before surgery

IntroductionHome-based, virtually-supported care models may represent the most efficient and scalable approach to delivering prehabilitation services. However, virtual approaches to prehabilitation are understudied. This manuscript describes the protocol for an...

Starting a surgical prehabilitation program: results from a pragmatic nonrandomized feasibility study.

We sought to assess the feasibility and estimate the effects on outcomes of a multimodal prehabilitation service implemented as an ancillary surgical service. We conducted a pragmatic, nonrandomized feasibility study of surgical prehabilitation. Patients were eligible if they were ≥ 18yr of age, fluent in English, and referred by a health professional for prehabilitation. Participants received an individualized program of preoperative exercise, nutrition, psychological, and/or smoking cessation support. The primary outcome was operational feasibility, including referral volume, enrolment rate, prehabilitation window, engagement, completion rate, and safety. Secondary outcomes included surgical complications, length of hospital stay, readmission, quality of life, and physical and mental health. Qualitative data related to intervention feasibility and acceptability. We compared intervention participants with patients who were referred for, but declined, prehabilitation. One hundred and sixteen patients were referred for prehabilitation. The mean age of referred patients was 71yr and 55% were male. Over 90% of referrals were from surgical oncology, and the most common indication for referral was frailty (46%). Of the 116 referred patients, 83 consented to participate in the study. Patient-reported and objectively measured outcomes improved by a clinically important margin from baseline to presurgery, and returned to presurgery levels by 90days postoperatively. Qualitative findings suggest that the prehabilitation intervention was well received. Multimodal surgical prehabilitation is feasible as an integrated clinical service and may be effective for improving physical and psychological outcomes. Further evaluations of clinically integrated prehabilitation programs in Canada are needed to confirm these findings.

Feasibility of a Multimodal Prehabilitation Program Before Elective Knee and Hip Arthroplasty in Older Adults

ObjectivesHip osteoarthritis and knee osteoarthritis cause significant disability and pain in older adults, often leading to hip or knee replacement surgery. Prehabilitation programs have been established for these surgeries, but there are few programs for orthogeriatrics. We evaluated the feasibility of a new multimodal prehabilitation program (MPP) for older adults before hip or knee replacement due to arthrosis: the Prehabilitation for Os (PRE4OS) study. DesignWe conducted a multicenter feasibility study in the Greater Paris area. Setting and ParticipantsEligible adults were ≥75 years old awaiting hip or knee replacement with at least a 6-week delay before surgery and able to participate in the MPP follow-up. The MPP included weekly hospital sessions providing nutritional, psychological, functional, and cognitive support, along with weekly home sessions featuring physiotherapist visits. MethodsThe primary outcome was at least 80% of 1-day hospital (ODH) sessions performed by 80% of participants. Secondary outcomes included intervention achievement, quality of life, and nutritional and functional status changes. Participant's satisfaction was qualitatively assessed via structured phone interviews presurgery and at 30 days postsurgery. ResultsFrom September 2021 to September 2023, a total of 27 individuals participated in the PRE4OS study. The mean (SD) age was 83 (4.3) years, with 7 males (26%) and median baseline Activities of Daily Living score 5.5 (interquartile range 5.5–6.0). Surgeries were for insertion of hip prosthesis in 17 participants (63%) and knee prosthesis in 10 (37%). The primary outcome was achieved in 89% of participants, with comparable rates for hip and knee prostheses. In total, 60% of participants rated the MPP as “excellent” presurgery and 100% at 30 days postsurgery, expressing a willingness to recommend the protocol to a friend or family. Conclusion and ImplicationsThe MPP was feasible for individuals before hip or knee replacement and was well received. Further randomized trials are needed to assess its clinical impact.

A prehabilitation programme is feasible and acceptable for mild-to-moderately frail patients undergoing cardiac surgeries

Abstract Background Preoperative frailty is a strong prognostication in cardiac surgical patients to predict poorer health outcomes. Intervening at the preoperative stage through prehabilitation is gaining increasing research attention. Previous studies tested a single frailty-reversing strategy, either nutritional or exercise, the exercise protocols were mainly aerobic-focused, which deviates from the exercise prescription principles suggested for frailty management, rendering an effective prehabilitation intervention is yet to be developed in cardiac surgical patients. Purpose This study aimed to examine the preliminary effects and explore the feasibility of a multi-component frailty-specific prehabilitation programme for mild-to-moderately frail patients undergoing cardiac surgeries/procedures. We hypothesised that compared with patients who receive usual care, patients awaiting cardiac surgeries who participate in the prehabilitation programme would have improved functional capacity, frailty status, quality of life and psychological outcomes, increased serum albumin and reduced C-reactive protein. Methods This study adopted a mixed-method design comprising a pilot randomised controlled trial and a qualitative study. Adult patients with a Clinical Frailty Scale score between 4 and 6, waiting for coronary artery bypass grafting surgery and/or valve repair/replacement, with at least 5 weeks of procedural waiting time and without contraindications for exercise were recruited. They were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive the prehabilitation programme or usual care. The programme comprised a structured preoperative education, nutritional optimization, stress management; and a multi-component exercise training with 3 sessions/week and 60 minutes/session. The exercise training lasted at least 4 weeks and maintained throughout the preoperative period. Results Twenty participants were randomized into the intervention (n = 11) or control (n = 9) group. The programme was feasible, acceptable and no severe adverse events were recorded. The lost to follow-up rate was 7.9%, and the overall attendance was 96%. The intervention group showed significantly greater improvement in functional capacity, frailty status and psychological outcomes than the control group at post-intervention. Participants gave positive comments about the programme and its delivery mode. They expressed that the one-on-one home-based practice enabled them greater confidence to overcome kinesiophobia. Two participants voiced out the preference for exclusive home-based training, rather than having hospital-based training in the first two weeks. Conclusion(s) The prehabilitation programme is feasible and acceptable for patients waiting for cardiac surgeries. It improves the functional performance, frailty status and psychological outcomes in these patients. A full-scale randomised controlled trial is warranted to investigate its longer-term and clinical effects.

Unveiling the intrinsic role of malnutrition in patients with Crohn's disease undergoing major surgery using entropy balancing weighting analysis.

The negative role of malnutrition in patients with Crohn's disease is known; however, many coexisting disease-related factors could cause misinterpretation of the real culprit. This study aimed to describe the role of malnutrition using a novel methodology, entropy balancing. This was a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients undergoing elective major surgery for Crohn's disease, preoperatively screened following the European Society for Clinical Nutrition guidelines. Two-step entropy balancing was applied to the group of malnourished patients to obtain an equal cohort having a null or low risk of malnutrition. The first reweighting homogenised the cohorts for non-modifiable confounding factors. The second reweighting matched the two groups for modifiable nutritional factors, assuming successful treatment of malnutrition. The entropy balancing was evaluated using the d-value. Postoperative results are reported as mean difference or OR, with a 95 % CI. Of the 183 patients, 69 (37·7 %) were at moderate/high risk for malnutrition. The malnourished patients had lower BMI (d = 1·000), Hb (d = 0·715), serum albumin (d = 0·981), a higher lymphocyte count (d = 0·124), Charlson Comorbidity Index (d = 0·257), American Society of Anaesthesiologists (d = 0·327) and Harvey-Bradshaw scores (d = 0·696). Protective loop ileostomy was more frequently performed (d = 0·648) in the malnourished group. After the first reweighting, malnourished patients experienced a prolonged length of stay (mean difference = 1·9; 0·11, 3·71, days), higher overall complication rate (OR 4·42; 1·39, 13·97) and higher comprehensive complication index score (mean difference = 8·9; 2·2 15·7). After thesecond reweighting, the postoperative course of the two groups was comparable. Entropy balancing showed the independent role of preoperative malnutrition and the possible advantages obtainable from a pre-habilitation programme in Crohn's disease patients awaiting surgery.

Prehabilitation for patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy prior to cancer resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

To determine the effectiveness of uni- or multimodal prehabilitation on several outcomes in patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy before cancer surgery. A systematic search was carried on May 1, 2023, using four major databases (SCOPUS, Web of Science, Medline (Ovid and Pubmed)) and updated monthly until February 2024. Inclusion criteria included (i) any original articles (any design), (ii) adult patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) prior to surgical resection, (iii) participation in uni- or multimodal prehabilitation programs during NAT, and (iv) reporting on any functional, treatment-related, or perioperative outcome. Two reviewers independently conducted the search and screened all records. Risk of bias was assessed using the Johanna Briggs Institute Appraisal Tools independently by two reviewers. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed for all outcomes with two or more studies. A total of 30 records met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. Studies showed that prehabilitation during NAT can be feasible in most settings and increase or prevent the loss of cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF), maintain or improve muscle mass, and improve pathological response and treatment completion compared to no prehabilitation, but the certainty of the evidence is low to moderate. However, according to our findings, prehabilitation has little to no effect on postoperative complications and length of hospital stay as well as in health-related quality of life. Prehabilitation during NAT might be feasible and associated with improvements in cardiorespiratory fitness, muscle mass, and treatment response/completion with low-to-moderate certainty of evidence. Insufficient data on safety is available at this stage.

Effectiveness of an Exercise and Educational-Based Prehabilitation Program in Patients with Breast Cancer Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy (PREOptimize) on Functional Outcomes: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

The study objective was to determine the effectiveness of a prehabilitation program to decrease postoperative musculoskeletal impairments in patients who have breast cancer and are receiving neoadjuvant therapy (NAT). Patients who had breast cancer and were receiving NAT before surgery were invited to participate in this randomized controlled trial. Patients randomized to the intervention group participated in a group-based prehabilitation program consisting of Nordic walking, resistance training, and therapeutic education from month 4 of NAT until before surgery. Patients in the control group received usual care (no prehabilitation). The main outcome was arm function measured with the short version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire 1month after surgery. Other measures included pain, range of motion, functional capacity, cancer-related fatigue, handgrip strength, physical activity, and arm circumferences. A total of 64 patients were randomized during the study period, and 61 completed all assessments. A significant difference in the main outcome (short version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire) was found before surgery as patients in the control group experienced worsening in arm function (mean difference = -9.84, 95% CI = -17.7 to -2). In addition, they also showed increased symptom frequency/severity according to the combined scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30) (mean difference = +6.7 points, 95% CI = 13.4 to 0.1) compared to the intervention group. Prehabilitation also improved functional capacity (mean difference = 67.6m, 95% CI = 37.4 to 97.7) and physical activity levels and decreased cancer-related fatigue (mean difference = -1.3, 95% CI = -0.29 to -2.4) compared to the control group but had no effect on other secondary outcomes. After surgery, patients receiving prehabilitation also exhibited greater functional capacity at both 1 and 3months. No other difference was observed. A prehabilitation program was able to maintain arm function and increase functional capacity while decreasing fatigue in patients with breast cancer receiving NAT. Prehabilitation programs should be offered to patients with breast cancer to maintain functionality and enhance physical performance before surgery. An exercise program combined with therapeutic education in patients with breast cancer who receive neoadjuvant therapy before surgery can improve functional capacity and prevent declines of arm mobility and function.

Head and Neck Cancer (HNC) Prehabilitation: Advantages and Limitations.

Cancer prehabilitation is the process between the time of cancer diagnosis and the beginning of the active acute treatment; prehabilitation consists of various need-based interventions, e.g., physical activity, a nutritional program, and psychological support. It can be delivered as unimodal or multimodal interventions. Physical activity, including resistant exercise and aerobic activities, has to be tailored according to the patient's characteristics; nutritional support is aimed at preventing malnutrition and sarcopenia; while psychological intervention intercepts the patient's distress and supports specific intervention to address it. In addition, multimodal prehabilitation could have a potential impact on the immune system, globally reducing the inflammatory processes and, as a consequence, influencing cancer progression. However, many challenges are still to be addressed, foremost among them the feasibility of prehabilitation programs, the lack of adequate facilities for these programs' implementation, and the fact that not all prehabilitation interventions are reimbursed by the national health system.

Multimodal prehabilitation improves functional capacity in patients with advanced ovarian cancer undergoing cytoreductive surgery

ObjectivePrehabilitation, defined as the preparatory intervention to increase patient preparedness in the lead-up to surgery, has shown a decrease in post-operative complications in various types of surgery. However, there is...

Nutritional intervention during a teleprehabilitation pilot study in high-risk patients with colorectal cancer: adherence, motivators, and barriers

PurposeThe preoperative period provides a window of opportunity to improve modifiable risk factors for treatment complications such as malnutrition, the so-called prehabilitation. Identifying factors related to adherence to nutritional interventions is essential for optimizing prehabilitation programs. The aim of this study is to evaluate a nutritional support module as part of a teleprehabilitation program in high-risk patients with colorectal cancer (CRC).MethodsA secondary analysis with a mixed method design of the nutritional support module of a pre-post teleprehabilitation pilot study was performed. Change in weight, complaints with intake, motivation, and subjective and objective adherence were evaluated.ResultsEleven patients were included. Subjectively, six patients (55%) were able to adhere to the nutritional advice. Despite that, nine of eleven (82%) patients experienced difficulties with the amount of food that was advised by the dietician. Six of eleven (55%) patients gained weight during the prehabilitation program. After prehabilitation, nine of eleven (82%) were able to reach 100% of their energy requirement and six of eleven (55%) were able to reach 100% of their protein requirement. Differences between patients in motivation and/or having complaints did not seem to be associated with protein and energy intake.ConclusionThis secondary analysis of a pilot study provides insights into understanding patients’ experiences with a nutritional support module as part of a teleprehabilitation program. With 82% of patients who were able to reach 100% of their energy requirement, teleprehabilitation seems to be feasible, while there is still room for improvement with respect to protein intake as only 55% of patients reached a sufficient intake.

Functional outcomes of prehabilitation programme for sarcopenic patients undergoing major colorectal cancer surgery

Functional outcomes of prehabilitation programme for sarcopenic patients undergoing major colorectal cancer surgery

Prehabilitation for delirium prevention in elderly patients with chronic limb threatening ischemia

Elderly patients with Chronic Limb Threatening Ischemia (CLTI) undergoing revascularization are prone to delirium and prolonged hospitalization. Preoperative prehabilitation may prevent delirium and reduce the length of stay. This study investigates the effect of multimodal prehabilitation on delirium incidence in elderly CLTI patients undergoing revascularization. A comparative observational cohort study conducted in a large teaching hospital (intervention cohort n=101, retrospective control cohort n=207) and a university hospital (prospective control cohort n=48) from 2020 to 2023. Patients aged ≥ 65 years undergoing revascularization were included, with acute treatment or severe cognitive impairment as exclusion criteria. The three-week prehabilitation program included screening of general health and presence of delirium risk factors by a vascular nurse practitioner, screening and provision of personalized, home-based exercises by a physiotherapist, provision of nutritional advice by a dietician, and if indicated comprehensive geriatric assessment by a geriatrician, assessment of self-reliance and home situation by a prearranged homecare nurse, guidance and support for smoking cessation by a quit smoking coach, and anaemia treatment. Primary outcome was 30-day delirium incidence, analysed using regression models adjusting for potential confounders (age, physical impairment, history of delirium, preoperative anaemia and revascularization type). Secondary outcomes were length of stay, postoperative complications, 30-day mortality, and patient experiences. Median age (IQR) was 76 years (71-82). Delirium incidence was lower in the prehabilitation cohort (n=2/101, 2%) compared to controls (n=23/255, 9%; OR=0.21, 95%CI 0.05-0.89, p=.04). Adjusted analysis showed a non-significant delirium reduction (OR=0.28, 95%CI 0.06-1.3, p=.097). The prehabilitation cohort had a significantly shorter length of stay (2 [1-5] vs 4 [2-9] days; p=<.001), and fewer minor complications (14% vs 26%, p=.01). No differences were present in major complications and 30-day mortality. Patients reported high compliance and satisfaction (median score 8/10, IQR 7-9). Prehabilitation among elderly CLTI patients is safe and has the potential to yield multiple beneficial effects on general outcomes following revascularization, while also achieving high levels of patient satisfaction. Further validation and considering implementation in surgical settings is recommended.

The role of prehabilitation in reducing the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery: Results from the Pre Surgery Check Team study.

Despite its importance, prehabilitation, has only been implemented in very few cardiac surgery centers. The Pre Surgery Check Team study was designed to evaluate the impact of comprehensive interdisciplinary assessment and implementation of the prehabilitation program on the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications after elective cardiac surgery. 725 adult patients (338 in the study group, 387 in the control group) were included in this single-center, prospective, observational study. Multimodal prehabilitation consisted of four elements: interdisciplinary medical assessment by cardiologist, anesthesiologist and cardiac surgeon, pulmonary assessment for patients at high risk of postoperative pulmonary complications, psychological assessment, and physiotherapeutic assessment and training. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of the postoperative pulmonary complications, and the secondary outcomes were: surgical site infection, rethoracotomy, ICU length of stay and hospital length of stay. Prehabilitation reduced the number of postoperative complications by 23%. Postoperative pneumonia was almost 3 times less common (5.33% vs 14.21%), and the surgical site infection - 1.4 times less common in the PreScheck group (8.28 vs 11.37%). In the logistic regression model, prehabilitation reduced the odds of postoperative pneumonia (by 0.346) and the odds of respiratory failure (by 0.479). Prehabilitation had no direct effect on ICU length of stay. Prehabilitation according to the Pre Surgery Check Team standard reduces the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications and the total number of postoperative complications in patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery. The main benefit of attending the PreScheck Team visit is the opportunity to perform supportive preoperative interventions.

Prehabilitation to Enhance Vascular Surgery Outcomes: A Narrative Review.

Prehabilitation, an emerging strategy, prepares patients for elective surgery by encouraging healthy behaviors, including physical exercise and healthy nutrition, while providing psychological support, to improve postoperative outcomes and foster healthier lifestyles. Despite growing interest, there is little research on prehabilitation. Specifically, studies involving prehabilitation in vascular surgery are heterogeneous with small sample sizes. This review aimed to investigate the reported positive impact of prehabilitation on vascular surgery patients, discuss prehabilitation models, highlight prehabilitation program-associated challenges, and suggest appropriate interventions. Prehabilitation improves physical fitness, reduces postoperative complications, and enhances overall recovery. Multimodal prehabilitation programs can positively impact vascular surgery patients, with benefits including improved cardiovascular fitness, reduced postoperative complications, shorter postoperative hospital stays, enhanced overall recovery, and improved quality of life. The currently reported prehabilitation programs are heterogeneous, with limitations regarding patient adherence and lack of long-term outcomes, posing challenges to their widespread adoption. Overall, prehabilitation shows promise for improving vascular surgery outcomes and fostering long-term healthy behaviors. The systematic implementation of prehabilitation in vascular surgery care pathways, overcoming reported limitations, and integrating multimodal prehabilitation into routine preoperative care holdpotential benefits. This review underscores the need for high-quality research to establish best practices in prehabilitation and integrate them into the standard of care for vascular surgery patients.

Role of sarcopenia in complex abdominal wall surgery: does it increase postoperative complications and mortality?

Sarcopenia is defined as the loss of skeletal muscle mass and is associated with an increased risk or morbidity and mortality in complex surgical patient populations. Its role in complex abdominal wall surgery (AWS) is yet to be determined. The aim of this study is to establish if sarcopenia has an impact on postoperative complications, mortality and hernia recurrence. Retrospective study of patients undergoing elective surgery for complex incisional hernias > 10cm (W3 of European Hernia Society classification) between 2014-2023. Sarcopenia was stablished as the skeletal muscle index (SMI), measured at L3 transversal section of a preoperative CT-scan. Previously defined literature-based SMI cutoff values were used: men ≤ 52.4cm2/m2, women ≤ 38.5cm2/m2. 135 patients undergoing complex AWS were included. Of them, 38 were sarcopenic (28.1%). The median follow-up time was 13months (IQR 12-25). In total, 11 patients died (8.1%). We found that sarcopenia was associated with a higher risk of mortality [HR 7.494 (95% CI 1.985-28.289); p 0.003]. There were no statistically significant differences in postoperative complications or hernia recurrence between both groups. Although sarcopenia does not seem to have an influence on hernia recurrence or the development of postoperative complications, whether local or systemic, in our study sarcopenia is associated with a higher risk of mortality after complex abdominal wall surgery. Nonetheless, with the results obtained in our study, we think that prehabilitation programs before complex AWS is advisable.

Financial implications of sarcopenia in colorectal cancer surgery: a cost analysis in an Australian public hospital.

Sarcopenia has a detrimental impact on patient outcomes following colorectal surgery, increasing financial strain on the healthcare system. Given the absence of specific Australian data, this study aimed to measure the cost of sarcopenia in the context of colorectal surgery in an Australian public hospital. A retrospective cost analysis, following CHEERS guidelines, was conducted on major elective colorectal cancer surgical cases at the Royal Adelaide Hospital between 2018 and 2022. The cross-sectional psoas area was measured through computed tomography (CT) imaging at the level of the third lumbar vertebrae, and sarcopenia was determined using gender-specific thresholds. Hospital billing data was used to gather costings (AU$). Out of 271 patients, 57 (21.0%) comprised the sarcopenic group (SG). SG patients were older (74 vs. 69 years, P < 0.001), had a higher American Society of Anaesthesiologists (>II, 71.9% vs. 53.7%, P = 0.014) and a lower median body mass index (24.8 vs. 28.7 kg/m2, P < 0.001). The SG exhibited a greater likelihood of complications (84.2 vs. 68.7%, P = 0.020) and prolonged hospital stay by 1 day (median 7 vs. 6 days, P = 0.027). Despite an increased mean total cost of hospital admission, no statistically significant difference was found (AU$37 712 vs. $34 845, P = 0.296). Multivariate analysis revealed hypoalbuminemia, prolonged operative time, postoperative ileus, return to theatre, Clavien-Dindo grade ≥3 complications, and prolonged stay increased overall cost (P < 0.05). Sarcopenia was not associated with a significantly increased cost of colorectal surgery in our institution. Future studies examining the cost-effectiveness of prehabilitation programmes targeting sarcopenia should be considered.

A Three-Day Prehabilitation Program is Cost-Effective for Preventing Pulmonary Complications after Heart Valve Surgery: A Health Economic Analysis of a Randomized Trial.

While prehabilitation (pre surgical exercise) effectively prevents postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs), its cost-effectiveness in valve heart disease (VHD) remains unexplored. This study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a three-day prehabilitation program for reducing PPCs and improving quality adjusted life years (QALYs) in Chinese VHD patients. A cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted alongside a randomized controlled trial featuring concealed allocation, blinded evaluators, and an intention-to-treat analysis. In total, 165 patients scheduled for elective heart valve surgery at West China Hospital were randomized into intervention and control groups. The intervention group participated in a three-day prehabilitation exercise program supervised by a physiotherapist while the control group received only standard preoperative education. Postoperative hospital costs were audited through the Hospital Information System, and the EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire was used to provide a 12-month estimation of QALY. Cost and effect differences were calculated through the bootstrapping method, with results presented in cost-effectiveness planes, alongside the associated cost-effectiveness acceptability curve (CEAC). All costs were denominated in Chinese Yuan (CNY) at an average exchange rate of 6.73 CNY per US dollar in 2022. There were no statistically significant differences in postoperative hospital costs (8484 versus 9615 CNY, 95% CI -2403 to 140) or in the estimated QALYs (0.909 versus 0.898, 95% CI -0.013 to 0.034) between the intervention and control groups. However, costs for antibiotics (339 versus 667 CNY, 95% CI -605 to -51), nursing (1021 versus 1200 CNY, 95% CI -330 to -28), and electrocardiograph monitoring (685 versus 929 CNY, 95% CI -421 to -67) were significantly lower in the intervention group than in the control group. The CEAC indicated that the prehabilitation program has a 92.6% and 93% probability of being cost-effective in preventing PPCs and improving QALYs without incurring additional costs. While the three-day prehabilitation program did not significantly improve health-related quality of life, it led to a reduction in postoperative hospital resource utilization. Furthermore, it showed a high probability of being cost-effective in both preventing PPCs and improving QALYs in Chinese patients undergoing valve surgery. This trial is registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (URL: https://www.chictr.org.cn/) with the registration identifier ChiCTR2000039671.

Preoperative nutritional support to tackle morbidity in multivisceral resection for retroperitoneal sarcoma. Early outcomes from a novel nutritional prehabilitation program in a prospective cohort

ObjectiveEvaluate the feasibility and outcomes of the implementation of a routinely prehabilitation nutritional program (PNP) in retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) patients. Summary background dataRate of preoperative malnutrition is scarcely evaluated in RPS patients and the efficacy of a PNP in detecting and reverting malnutrition has not been studied. MethodsProspective study in a high-volume reference center for RPS; adult patients with primary or persistent RPS deemed surgically resectable were enrolled in a PNP. Results119 patients underwent surgery for RPS at Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori in Milan, 73 (61.3 %) were enrolled in the PNP while the remaining served as control cohort. 43.8 % (32/73), 28.8 % (21/73), and 27.4 % (20/73) were classified as non-malnourished, moderately malnourished, and severely malnourished at diagnosis, respectively. Preoperative nutritional support was provided to 35 out of 73 patients (47.9 %). Among untreated patients 20 of 38 (52.6 %) experienced a preoperative worsening of their nutritional status, whereas among those in the prehabilitation program 16 of 35 (45.7 %) showed improvement.Surgical complications did not significantly differ between malnourished and non-malnourished patients, potentially due to increased use of diverting stomas in malnourished patients to prevent infectious complications. Reversal of initial malnutrition correlated with better postoperative outcomes, as evidenced by lower rates of severe complications (OR: 0.18, 95%CI 0.04–0.75, p = 0.02) and a lower Comprehensive Complication Index (OR: −0.28, 95%CI -0.51 to −0.06, p = 0.02) in multivariate analysis. ConclusionsThe implementation of a prehabilitation nutritional program brought relevant benefits in terms of postoperative morbidity.

No thanks and not for me: A qualitative study of barriers to prehabilitation participation

BackgroundPrehabilitation programs have been shown to improve functional status prior to surgery, postoperative recovery, and even long-term outcomes. However, these programs often lack participation, often by patients who seem to need it the most. This study aimed to identify the primary reasons for patients' declining enrollment or low adherence to a prehabilitation program. MethodsWe recruited adult patients who had undergone or planned to undergo major abdominal surgery for semistructured one-on-one audio-recorded interviews. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and iteratively coded deductively and inductively. Thematic analysis was performed. ResultsWe interviewed 11 patients, at which point we reached thematic saturation. The patients were on average 53 years old (range 38–75) and 27% were women and 73% were men. The pooled kappa score was 0.81, indicating concordance among the coding researchers. Seven potential barriers to prehabilitation participation and adherence were identified: poorly timed recruitment efforts, misconceptions about prehabilitation diet recommendations, competing priorities that made prehabilitation less feasible, lack of family alignment, belief that prehabilitation would not be helpful, concerns over specific prehabilitation program components, and belief that prehabilitation is helpful for others but not for themselves. ConclusionLow participation and adherence limit the success and reach of many prehabilitation programs. Improved timing and content of communication by the prehabilitation team is critical for improving recruitment of patients. Flexibility and customization may reframe prehabilitation as feasible rather than a difficult chore, increasing participation and adherence. Understanding patients' concerns and readiness to adopt new health behaviors is a necessary component of any behavioral intervention.

Prehabilitation for frail patients undergoing hip and knee replacement in the UK: Joint PREP feasibility study for a randomised controlled trial

ObjectiveTo determine the feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate a prehabilitation programme for frail patients undergoing total hip replacement (THR) or total knee replacement (TKR).DesignRandomised feasibility...