Stimulation Of Prefrontal Cortex Research Articles

Modulation of Alcohol Use Disorder by Brain Stimulation.

Currently available therapeutic modalities for alcohol use disorder (AUD) produce limited effect sizes or long-term compliance. Recent methods that were developed to modulate brain activity represent potential novel treatment options. Various methods of brain stimulation, when applied repeatedly, can induce long-term neurobiological, behavioral, and cognitive modifications. Recent studies in alcoholic subjects indicate the potential of brain stimulation methods to reduce alcohol craving, consumption, and relapse. Specifically, deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the nucleus accumbens or non-surgical stimulation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (PFC) or medial PFC and anterior cingulate cortex using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has shown clinical benefit. However, further preclinical and clinical research is needed to establish understanding of mechanisms and the treatment protocols of brain stimulation for AUD. While efforts to design comparable apparatus in rodents continue, preclinical studies can be used to examine targets for DBS protocols, or to administer temporal patterns of pulsus similar to those used for TMS, to more superficial targets through implanted electrodes. The clinical field will benefit from studies with larger sample sizes, higher numbers of stimulation sessions, maintenance sessions, and long follow-up periods. The effect of symptoms provocation before and during stimulation should be further studied. Larger studies may have the power to explore predictive factors for the clinical outcome and thereby to optimize patient selection and eventually even develop personalization of the stimulation parameters.

Good moments to stimulate the brain – A randomized controlled double-blinded study on anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the ventromedial prefrontal cortex on two different time points in a two-day fear conditioning paradigm

It is assumed that extinction learning is a suitable model for understanding the mechanisms underlying exposure therapy. Furthermore, there is evidence that non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) can elevate extinction learning by enhancing frontal brain activity and therefore NIBS can augment symptom reduction during exposure therapy in phobias. But, the underlying processes are still not well established. Open questions arise from NIBS time points and electrode placement, among others. Therefore, we investigated in a 2-day fear conditioning experiment, whether anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) modulates either fear memory consolidation or dampened fear reaction during fear extinction. Sixty-six healthy participants were randomly assigned either to a group that received tDCS after fear acquisition (and before fear memory consolidation), to a group that received tDCS directly before fear extinction, or to a control group that never received active stimulation (sham). Differential skin conductance response (SCR) to CS+ vs. CS- was significantly decreased in both tDCS-groups compared to sham group. Our region of interest, the vmPFC, was stimulated best focally with a lateral anode position and a cathode on the contralateral side. But this comes along with a slightly lateral stimulation of vmPFC depending on whether anode is placed left or right. To avoid unintended effects of stimulated sides the two electrode montages (anode left or right) were mirror-inverted which led to differential effects in SCR and electrocortical (mainly late positive potential [LPP]) data in our exploratory analyses. Results indicated that tDCS-timing is relevant for fear reactions via disturbed fear memory consolidation as well as fear expression, and this depends on whether vmPFC is stimulated with either left- or right-sided anode electrode montage. Electrocortical data can shed more light on the underlying neural correlates and exaggerated LPP seems to be associated with disturbed fear memory consolidation and dampened SCR to CS+ vs. CS-, but solely in the right anode electrode montage. Further open questions addressing where and when to stimulate the prefrontal brain in the course of augmenting fear extinction are raised.

P29: Prolonged Intermittent Theta-Burst Stimulation of the Left Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex for Older Adults with Treatment-Resistant Depression: Effectiveness and Safety

Objective:Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) is not uncommon in older people. Brain stimulation, such as 4-6 weeks of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) or theta burst stimulation (TBS) targeting the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, has been evidenced as an essential intervention for adult TRD and also documented in the current international treatment guideline. In 2018, Taiwan Food and Drug Administration cleared the rTMS as a treatment option for TRD and now rTMS is still a treatment at their own expense in Taiwan. Additionally, prolonged intermittent TBS (piTBS) protocol has been proven its similar antidepressant efficacy as standard 4-6 weeks rTMS/iTBS in adult TRD, but in a shorter treatment course of 2 weeks. For older adults with depression, 4-6 weeks of treatment course may burden their caregiver due to their limited ambulation and transportation ability. However, hitherto there was no study to investigate the antidepressant efficacy of left-sided prefrontal piTBS in treating older TRD.Methods:A chart review was performed at a single Taiwan hospital from 2018 to 2020. 17-items Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-17) was measured before and after the piTBS intervention. Maudsley Staging Method was used for the depression treatment refractoriness.Results:We identified 23 old adults with TRD (mean [SD] age, 66.0[5.2]; 78% female) who underwent 10-20 sessions of daily piTBS (1800 pulses/session; 10sessions, n=18, 15sessions,n=4, 20session,n=1). On continuous outcomes, mean(SD) HDRS-17 total scores improved from 20.5(6.62) to 11.8(7.7) after receiving piTBS intervention. The mean percent improvement of HDRS-17 was 46.0%±29.4%. Dichotomous outcomes showed response rate of 43.5% and remission rate of 34.8%. No seizures or other serious adverse events were noted, and no premature discontinuation was noted.Conclusion:This study is the largest study demonstrating the piTBS protocol provides a comparable reduction in depression symptoms in older adults with TRD, similar to the effectiveness in adult TRD and the efficacy of standard sequential bilateral rTMS/iTBS in older TRD in the FOUR-D trial. Regarding desirable efficiency and effectiveness, piTBS may be an optimal form of rTMS in treating older adults with TRD. Further large comparative effectiveness trials with standard iTBS or high-frequency rTMS in this population are warranted.

The role of transcranial direct current stimulation in improving learning and memory performances of patients with mild cognitive impairment and mild Alzheimer’s disease: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study

AbstractBackgroundTranscranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a safe non‐invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) procedure which helps to stimulate a particular region of interest by modulating the neuronal firing rate, thereby modulating the cognitive functioning. The tDCS intervention is known to show improvement on memory recall and recognition in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and mild Alzheimer’s Disease (mild AD)MethodWe investigated the effect of anodal stimulation at the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and cathodal stimulation at the right supra‐orbital area in patients with MCI (n = 18) and mild AD (n = 20) (Refer Table 1), after due approval from Institute Ethics Committee NIMHANS. Both baseline and post‐intervention assessments for a single patient were administered by the different assessors allocated randomly using NIMHANS neuropsychological battery for elderly (NNB‐E). Two resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rsfMRI) acquisitions, before and after the ten sessions of tDCS, each session lasting 20 minutes. A spherical mask of 5 mm diameter was chosen a priori on the left middle frontal gyrus (LMFG) as a seed for performing seed based functional connectivity (sbFC) analysis using default preprocessing pipeline and pre‐post analysis setup in CONN 18b toolbox.ResultThe combined sample of patients with MCI and mild AD showed significant improvement in word list learning trial 3 (pre tDCS 5.85 (1.59); post tDCS 6.63 (1.67); Z = 3.586, p<0.0001) and delayed recall (pre tDCS 1.50 (1.88); post tDCS 2.45 (2.33); Z = 3.656, p<0.0001) scores using NNB‐E. The sbFC analysis showed significantly reduced functional connectivity between left MFG (the region of anodal stimulation) and posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) as well as precuneus cortex (cluster‐level extent threshold p‐FDR <0.05) after tDCS. Post‐hoc tests showed that these reductions after tDCS intervention were also found to be significantly associated with attention and auditory verbal learning memory scores (Refer Figure 1 and Table 2).ConclusionThe tDCS intervention helped reducing the functional connectivity at rest, which was responsible for compensatory neuronal processes found in early AD. These findings unravel the therapeutic role of tDCS by enhancing auditory verbal memory performance and altering the functional connectivity at PCC and precuneus cortex in earlier stages of AD.

TMS disruption ofthe lateral prefrontal cortex increases neural activity inthe default mode network when naming facial expressions.

Recognizing facial expressions is dependent on multiple brain networks specialized for different cognitive functions. In the current study, participants (N = 20) were scanned using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), while they performed a covert facial expression naming task. Immediately prior to scanning thetaburst transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was delivered over the right lateral prefrontal cortex (PFC), or the vertex control site. A group whole-brain analysis revealed that TMS induced opposite effects in the neural responses across different brain networks. Stimulation of the right PFC (compared to stimulation of the vertex) decreased neural activity in the left lateral PFC but increased neural activity in three nodes of the default mode network (DMN): the right superior frontal gyrus, right angular gyrus and the bilateral middle cingulate gyrus. A region of interest analysis showed that TMS delivered over the right PFC reduced neural activity across all functionally localised face areas (including in the PFC) compared to TMS delivered over the vertex. These results suggest that visually recognizing facial expressions is dependent on the dynamic interaction of the face-processing network and the DMN. Our study also demonstrates the utility of combined TMS/fMRI studies for revealing the dynamic interactions between different functional brain networks.

Electrical stimulation of the ventromedial prefrontal cortex modulates muscle sympathetic nerve activity and blood pressure.

We recently showed that transcranial alternating current stimulation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex modulates spontaneous bursts of muscle sympathetic nerve activity, heart rate, and blood pressure (Sesa-Ashton G, Wong R, McCarthy B, Datta S, Henderson LA, Dawood T, Macefield VG. Stimulation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex modulates muscle sympathetic nerve activity and blood pressure in humans. Cereb Cortex Comm. 2022:3:2tgac017.). Stimulation was delivered between scalp electrodes placed over the nasion and electroencephalogram (EEG) electrode site F3 (left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex) or F4 (right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex), and therefore the current passed within the anatomical locations underlying the left and right ventromedial prefrontal cortices. Accordingly, we tested the hypothesis that stimulation of the left and right ventromedial prefrontal cortices would also modulate muscle sympathetic nerve activity, although we predicted that this would be weaker than that seen during dorsolateral prefrontal cortex stimulation. We further tested whether stimulation of the right ventromedial prefrontal cortices would cause greater modulation of muscle sympathetic nerve activity, than stimulation of the left ventromedial prefrontal cortices. In 11 individuals, muscle sympathetic nerve activity was recorded via microelectrodes inserted into the right common peroneal nerve, together with continuous blood pressure, electrocardiogram, and respiration. Stimulation was achieved using transcranial alternating current stimulation, +2 to -2mA, 0.08Hz, 100cycles, applied between electrodes placed over the nasion, and EEG electrode site FP1, (left ventromedial prefrontal cortices) or FP2 (right ventromedial prefrontal cortices); for comparison, stimulation was also applied over F4 (right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex). Stimulation of all three cortical sites caused partial entrainment of muscle sympathetic nerve activity to the sinusoidal stimulation, together with modulation of blood pressure and heart rate. We found a significant fall in mean blood pressure of ~6mmHg (P = 0.039) during stimulation of the left ventromedial prefrontal cortices, as compared with stimulation of the right. We have shown, for the first time, that transcranial alternating current stimulation of the ventromedial prefrontal cortices modulates muscle sympathetic nerve activity and blood pressure in awake humans at rest. However, it is unclear if this modulation occurred through the same brain pathways activated during transcranial alternating current stimulation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex.

Home-administered transcranial direct current stimulation with asynchronous remote supervision in the treatment of depression: feasibility, tolerability, and clinical effectiveness.

Depression is an often chronic condition, characterized by wide-ranging physical, cognitive and psychosocial symptoms that can lead to disability, premature mortality or suicide. It affects 350 million people globally, yet up to 30% do not respond to traditional treatment, creating an urgent need for novel non-pharmacological treatments. This open-label naturalistic study assesses the practical feasibility, tolerability, and clinical effectiveness of home-administered transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) with asynchronous remote supervision, in the treatment of depression. Over the course of 3 weeks, 40 patients with depression received psychotherapy and half of this group also received daily bi-frontal tDCS stimulation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. These patients received tDCS for 30 min per session with the anode placed over F3 and the cathode over F4, at an intensity of 2 mA for 21 consecutive days. We measured patients' level of depression symptoms at four time points using the Beck Depression Inventory, before treatment and at 1-week intervals throughout the treatment period. We monitored practical feasibility such as daily protocol compliance and tolerability including side effects, with the PlatoScience cloud-based remote supervision platform. Of the 20 patients in the tDCS group, 90% were able to comply with the protocol by not missing more than three of their assigned sessions, and none dropped out of the study. No serious adverse events were reported, with only 14 instances of mild to moderate side effects and two instances of scalp pain rated as severe, out of a total of 420 stimulation sessions. Patients in the tDCS group showed a significantly greater reduction in depression symptoms after 3 weeks of treatment, compared to the treatment as usual (TAU) group [t(57.2) = 2.268, p = 0.027]. The tDCS group also showed greater treatment response (50%) and depression remission rates (75%) compared to the TAU group (5 and 30%, respectively). These findings provide a possible indication of the clinical effectiveness of home-administered tDCS for the treatment of depression, and its feasibility and tolerability in combination with asynchronous supervision.

Predictive role of impulsivity, anxiety, and depression in the efficacy of intermittent theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation modalities for treating methamphetamine use disorder: A randomized clinical trial

IntroductionMethamphetamine use disorder (MUD) can cause impulsive behavior, anxiety, and depression. Stimulation of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in MUD patients by intermittent theta burst repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (iTBS-rTMS) is effective in reducing cravings, impulsive behavior, anxiety, and depression. The purpose of this study was to explore whether these psychological factors helped to predict MUD patients' responses to iTBS-rTMS treatment. MethodsFifty MUD patients and sixty healthy subjects matched for general conditions were used as study subjects. The study randomly divided MUD patients into iTBS-rTMS and sham stimulation groups and received 20 sessions of real or sham iTBS-rTMS treatment, and the study collected cue-related evoked craving data before and after treatment. All subjects completed the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS-11), Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), and Self-rating Depression Scale (SDS). ResultsThe MUD patients showed significantly higher levels of impulsivity, anxiety, and depression than the healthy subjects. The MUD patients who received the real treatment had significantly lower impulsivity, anxiety, and depression scores, and better treatment effects on cravings than the sham stimulation group. The Spearman rank correlation and stepwise multiple regression analyses showed that the baseline BIS-11 and the reduction rate (RR) of BIS-11 and RR of SDS were positively correlated with the decrease in cravings in the iTBS-rTMS group. ROC curve analysis showed that RR of SDS (AUC = 91.6 %; 95 % CI = 0.804–1.000) had predictive power to iTBS- rTMS therapeutic efficacy, the cutoff value is 15.102 %. ConclusionsiTBS-rTMS had a good therapeutic effect in MUD patients and the baseline impulsivity, the improved depression and impulsivity were associated with therapeutic effect of iTBS-rTMS. The improved depression had the potential to predict the efficacy of the iTBS-rTMS modality for MUD treatment.

Sex-specific prefrontal-hypothalamic control of behavior and stress responding

Depression and cardiovascular disease are both augmented by daily life stress. Yet, the biological mechanisms that translate psychological stress into affective and physiological outcomes are unknown. Previously, we demonstrated that stimulation of the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) has sexually divergent outcomes on behavior and physiology. Importantly, the vmPFC does not innervate the brain regions that initiate autonomic or neuroendocrine stress responses; thus, we hypothesized that intermediate synapses integrate cortical information to regulate stress responding. The posterior hypothalamus (PH) directly innervates stress-effector regions and receives substantial innervation from the vmPFC. In the current studies, circuit-specific approaches examined whether vmPFC synapses in the PH coordinate stress responding. Here we tested the effects of optogenetic vmPFC-PH circuit stimulation in male and female rats on social and motivational behaviors as well as physiological stress responses. Additionally, an intersectional genetic approach was used to knock down synaptobrevin in PH-projecting vmPFC neurons. Our collective results indicate that male vmPFC-PH circuitry promotes positive motivational valence and is both sufficient and necessary to reduce sympathetic-mediated stress responses. In females, the vmPFC-PH circuit does not affect social or preference behaviors but is sufficient and necessary to elevate neuroendocrine stress responses. Altogether, these data suggest cortical regulation of stress reactivity and behavior is mediated, in part, by projections to the hypothalamus that function in a sex-specific manner.

Higher-order comparative reward processing is affected by noninvasive stimulation of the ventromedial prefrontal cortex.

A crucial skill, especially in rapidly changing environments, is to be able to learn efficiently from prior rewards or losses and apply this acquired knowledge in upcoming situations. Often, we must weigh the risks of different options and decide whether an option is worth the risk or whether we should choose a safer option. The ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) is suggested as a major hub for basic but also higher-order reward processing. Dysfunction in this region has been linked to cognitive risk factors for depression and behavioral addictions, including reduced optimism and feedback learning. Here, we test whether modulations of vmPFC excitability via noninvasive transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) can alter reward anticipation and reward processing. In a financial gambling task, participants chose between a higher and a lower monetary risk option and eventually received feedback whether they won or lost. Simultaneously feedback on the unchosen option was presented as well. Behavioral and magnetoencephalographic correlates of reward processing were evaluated in direct succession of either excitatory or inhibitory tDCS of the vmPFC. We were able to show modulated reward approach behavior (expectancy of greater reward magnitudes) as well as altered reevaluation of received feedback by vmPFC tDCS as indicated by modified choice behavior following the feedback. Thereby, tDCS not only influenced early, rather basic reward processing, but it also modulated higher-order comparative feedback evaluation of gains and losses relative to alternative outcomes. The neural results underline this idea, as stimulation-driven modulations of the basic reward-related effect occurred at rather early time intervals and were followed by stimulation effects related to comparative reward processing. Importantly, behavioral ratings were correlated with neural activity in left frontal areas. Our results imply a dual function of the vmPFC consisting of approaching reward (as indicated by more risky choices) and elaborately evaluating outcomes. In addition, our data suggest that vmPFC activity is associated with adaptive decision-making in the future via modulated behavioral adaptation or reinforcement learning.

Theta burst stimulation add on to dialectical behavioral therapy in borderline-personality-disorder: methods and design of a randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled pilot trial

Specialized psychotherapeutic treatments like dialectical behavioral therapy (DBT) are recommended as first treatment for borderline personality disorder (BPD). In recent years, studies have emerged that focus on repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in BPD. Both have independently demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of BPD. Intermitted theta burst stimulation (iTBS), a modified design of rTMS, is thought to increase the excitability of neurons and could be a supplement to psychotherapy in addition to being a standalone treatment. However, no studies to date have investigated the combination of DBT and rTMS/iTBS. This study protocol describes the methods and design of a randomized, single-blinded, sham-controlled clinical pilot study in which BPD patients will be randomly assigned to either iTBS or sham during four consecutive weeks (20 sessions in total) in addition to standardized DBT treatment. The stimulation will focus on the unilateral stimulation of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), which plays an important role in the control of impulsivity and risk-taking. Primary outcome is the difference in borderline symptomatology, while secondary target criteria are depressive symptoms, general functional level, impulsivity and self-compassion. Statistical analysis of therapy response will be conducted by Mixed Model Repeated Measurement using a 2 × 2-factorial between-subjects design with the between-subject factor stimulation (TMS vs. Sham) and the within-subject factor time (T0 vs. T1). Furthermore, structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) will be conducted and analyzed. The study will provide evidence and insight on whether iTBS has an enhancing effect as add-on to DBT in BPD.Trial registration: drks.de (DRKS00020413) registered 13/01/2020.

The Neurological Rehabilitation of Adults With Coma and Disorders of Consciousness.

Severe quantitative disorders of consciousness (DoC) due to acute brain injury affect up to 47% of patients upon admission to intensive care and early rehabilitation units. Nevertheless, the rehabilitation of this vulnerable group of patients has not yet been addressed in any German-language guidelines and has only been studied in a small number of randomized clinical trials. In an S3 clinical practice guideline project, a systematic literature search was carried out for interventions that could improve consciousness in patients with coma, unresponsive wakefulness syndrome, or minimally conscious state after acute brain injury, and an evidence-based evaluation of these interventions was performed. Recommendations concerning diagnostic methods and medical ethics were issued by consensus. Misdiagnoses are common in patients with DoC, with minimal consciousness often going unrecognized. Patients with DoC should, therefore, be repeatedly assessed with standardized instruments, particularly the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised. The literature search yielded 54 clinical trials, mostly of low quality; there were two randomized controlled clinical trials providing level 1 evidence. The best available evidence for the improvement of impaired consciousness is for the administration of amantadine (4 studies) and for anodal transcranial direct-current stimulation of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in patients in the minimal conscious state (8 studies, 2 systematic reviews). Further important components of rehabilitation include positioning methods and sensory stimulation techniques such as music therapy. For the first time, evidence-based German-language clinical practice guidelines have now become available for the neurological rehabilitation of patients with DoC.

Facilitated lexical processing accuracy and reaction times following repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in dementia of the Alzheimer type: a case study

ABSTRACT We investigated the potential effects of high-frequency (10 Hz) repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) of the bilateral Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex (DLPFC) (30-sessions; 2-sessions/day) on improving lexical processing in one participant with mild – Alzheimer’s disease (hereafter dementia of the Alzheimer type-DAT). Increased accuracy and faster reaction times (RTs) were reported in a lexical-decision task (LDT) up to 2-months post-intervention. The current findings indicate that high-frequency stimulation of the DLPFC might be a potential therapeutic tool to improve lexical processing in mild-DAT.

Individual Differences in Decision Strategy Relate to Neurochemical Excitability and Cortical Thickness.

The speed-accuracy trade-off (SAT), whereby faster decisions increase the likelihood of an error, reflects a cognitive strategy humans must engage in during the performance of almost all daily tasks. To date, computational modeling has implicated the latent decision variable of response caution (thresholds), the amount of evidence required for a decision to be made, in the SAT. Previous imaging has associated frontal regions, notably the left prefrontal cortex and the presupplementary motor area (pre-SMA), with the setting of such caution levels. In addition, causal brain stimulation studies, using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), have indicated that while both of these regions are involved in the SAT, their role appears to be dissociable. tDCS efficacy to impact decision-making processes has previously been linked with neurochemical concentrations and cortical thickness of stimulated regions. However, to date, it is unknown whether these neurophysiological measures predict individual differences in the SAT, and brain stimulation effects on the SAT. Using ultra-high field (7T) imaging, here we report that instruction-based adjustments in caution are associated with both neurochemical excitability (the balance between GABA+ and glutamate) and cortical thickness across a range of frontal regions in both sexes. In addition, cortical thickness, but not neurochemical concentrations, was associated with the efficacy of left prefrontal and superior medial frontal cortex (SMFC) stimulation to modulate performance. Overall, our findings elucidate key neurophysiological predictors, frontal neural excitation, of individual differences in latent psychological processes and the efficacy of stimulation to modulate these.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT The speed-accuracy trade-off (SAT), faster decisions increase the likelihood of an error, reflects a cognitive strategy humans must engage in during most daily tasks. The SAT is often investigated by explicitly instructing participants to prioritize speed or accuracy when responding to stimuli. Using ultra-high field (7T) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), we found that individual differences in the extent to which participants adjust their decision strategies with instruction related to neurochemical excitability (ratio of GABA+ to glutamate) and cortical thickness in the frontal cortex. Moreover, brain stimulation to the left prefrontal cortex and the superior medial frontal cortex (SMFC) modulated performance, with the efficacy specifically related to cortical thickness. This work sheds new light on the neurophysiological basis of decision strategies and brain stimulation.

Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) in Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder: Study Protocol of a Nationwide Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial of Neuro-Enhanced Psychotherapy "TraumaStim".

The use of high-frequency Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (HF-rTMS) of the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) in treating Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) is currently regarded as a level B intervention (probable effectiveness). HF-rTMS has attracted interest as a neuromodulation therapeutic method for PTSD. Prolonged exposure and reactivation therapy are also regarded as first-line treatments for PTSD. Randomized controlled clinical studies examining the effectiveness of several HF-rTMS sessions coupled with psychotherapy have not yet been completed. In total, 102 patients with refractory PTSD will be randomly assigned (1:1) to reactivation therapy, in addition to either active HF-rTMS (20 Hz) or sham HF-rTMS, for 12 sessions in a nationwide, multicenter, double-blind controlled trial. The impact on PTSD symptoms and neurocognitive functioning will be assessed. The primary outcome is the PTSD severity score measured based on the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS-5) at one month. If this additional therapy is successful, it may strengthen the case for regulatory authorities to approve this additional technique of treating PTSD. Additionally, it expands the field of neurostimulation-assisted psychotherapy.

The Effect of Multi-Session Prefrontal Cortical Stimulation on Aggression: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group Trial.

Findings from brain imaging studies investigating the neural underpinnings of antisocial behavior have implicated the prefrontal cortex in the regulation of aggressive reactions. However, relatively few studies have examined the role of the prefrontal cortex on aggression in an experimental way. This study examines whether upregulating the prefrontal cortex using repeated transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) reduces aggressive behavior. In a double-blind, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial, 88 healthy adults (42 males, 46 females) were assigned to one session of anodal tDCS over the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (n = 47) or sham stimulation (n = 41) per day for three consecutive days and assessed using a behavioral measure of aggression. Levels of aggressive responses post-intervention did not significantly differ between the active and sham stimulation groups. However, a significant interaction effect between the stimulation group and gender was observed, whereby males, but not females, exhibited reduced aggression after prefrontal stimulation. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first study to examine the effect of multi-session prefrontal tDCS on aggressive behavior in healthy adults. Results highlight that there are differences in responsivity to tDCS in modifying aggressive behavior.

Transcranial random noise stimulation combined with cognitive training for treating ADHD: a randomized, sham-controlled clinical trial

Non-invasive brain stimulation has been suggested as a potential treatment for improving symptomology and cognitive deficits in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), the most common childhood neurodevelopmental disorder. Here, we examined whether a novel form of stimulation, high-frequency transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS), applied with cognitive training (CT), may impact symptoms and neural oscillations in children with ADHD. We conducted a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial in 23 unmedicated children with ADHD, who received either tRNS over the right inferior frontal gyrus (rIFG) and left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (lDLPFC) or sham stimulation for 2 weeks, combined with CT. tRNS + CT yielded significant clinical improvements (reduced parent-reported ADHD rating-scale scores) following treatment, compared to the control intervention. These improvements did not change significantly at a 3-week follow-up. Moreover, resting state (RS)-EEG periodic beta bandwidth of the extracted peaks was reduced in the experimental compared to control group immediately following treatment, with further reduction at follow-up. A lower aperiodic exponent, which reflects a higher cortical excitation/inhibition (E/I) balance and has been related to cognitive improvement, was seen in the experimental compared to control group. This replicates previous tRNS findings in adults without ADHD but was significant only when using a directional hypothesis. The experimental group further exhibited longer sleep onset latencies and more wake-up times following treatment compared to the control group. No significant group differences were seen in executive functions, nor in reported adverse events. We conclude that tRNS + CT has a lasting clinical effect on ADHD symptoms and on beta activity. These results provide a preliminary direction towards a novel intervention in pediatric ADHD.

The effects of transcranial electrical stimulation of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex on tactile spatial discrimination performance

The dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) plays a key role in tactile perceptual discrimination performance. Both transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) and anodal transcranial pulsed current stimulation (tPCS) have been shown to modulate neural activity in cortical regions. In this study, we aimed to determine whether tRNS and anodal tPCS over the left DLPFC would improve tactile perceptual discrimination performance of the right index finger in healthy neurological individuals. Subjects underwent a grating orientation task before, immediately after, and 30 min after applying tRNS in Experiment 1 or anodal tPCS in Experiment 2. tRNS application on the left DLPFC tended to enhance tactile perceptual discrimination performance. In contrast, the application of anodal tPCS over the left DLPFC did not affect tactile perceptual discrimination performance. These findings indicate that transcranial electrical stimulation to the left DLPFC may improve tactile perceptual discrimination performance, with effects that depend on stimulus modality.

Effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation of the rostromedial prefrontal cortex in obsessive–compulsive disorder: a randomized clinical trial

Effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation of the rostromedial prefrontal cortex in obsessive–compulsive disorder: a randomized clinical trial

Combining noninvasive brain stimulation with behavioral pharmacology methods to study mechanisms of substance use disorder.

Psychotropic drugs and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) are effective for treating certain psychiatric conditions. Drugs and TMS have also been used as tools to explore the relationship between brain function and behavior in humans. Combining centrally acting drugs and TMS has proven useful for characterizing the neural basis of movement. This combined intervention approach also holds promise for improving our understanding of the mechanisms underlying disordered behavior associated with psychiatric conditions, including addiction, though challenges exist. For example, altered neocortical function has been implicated in substance use disorder, but the relationship between acute neuromodulation of neocortex with TMS and direct effects on addiction-related behaviors is not well established. We propose that the combination of human behavioral pharmacology methods with TMS can be leveraged to help establish these links. This perspective article describes an ongoing study that combines the administration of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the main psychoactive compound in cannabis, with neuroimaging-guided TMS in individuals with problematic cannabis use. The study examines the impact of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) stimulation on cognitive outcomes impacted by THC intoxication, including the subjective response to THC and the impairing effects of THC on behavioral performance. A framework for integrating TMS with human behavioral pharmacology methods, along with key details of the study design, are presented. We also discuss challenges, alternatives, and future directions.