Terms Of Preferences Research Articles

A Retrospective Observational Study of Adverse Drug Reactions (ADR) Reported to ADR Monitoring Centre from 2010 to 2020.

Adverse Drug Reactions (ADR) are one of the essential causes of hospital admissions and pose a significant clinical and economic burden on the healthcare system. The Adverse Drug Reaction Monitoring Centre (AMC) in JIPMER functioning under the Pharmacovigilance Programme of India (PvPI) plays a vital role in ensuring medication safety by routinely detecting and monitoring ADRs. Hence, this study aimed to assess the characteristics of ADR reported from 2010 to 2020 in AMC JIPMER and to detect signals, if any. To study the characteristics of Adverse Drug Reactions (ADR) reported to a regional ADR monitoring center from 2010 to 2020 and to detect signals of disproportionate reporting (SDRs) if any from the reported ADRs. A total of 6007 ADR reports with a single suspect drug were included for analysis from 2010 to 2020. The characteristics of these reports, including patient's age and gender, Number and percentage of ADRs, the causality of ADR using WHO UMC (World Health Organization-Uppsala Monitoring Scale), the seriousness of the ADR, and outcome were collected from the ADR reports. MedDRA (Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities) Preferred Terms (PT) were used to classify adverse drug reactions. Causality analysis using the Naranjo Algorithm and Preventability using Modified Schumock and Thornton criteria were performed for the ADRs. The number and percentage of severe ADRs were analyzed. The System Organ class of all the ADRs was enumerated. ADRs not mentioned in the US FDA (United States Food and Drug Administration) product label (unlabelled reactions) were documented. Unlabeled reactions with ≥3 ADR reports were included for signal detection by disproportionality analysis. Antineoplastic drugs, followed by antimicrobials, anticonvulsants, Anti snake venom, and NSAID were the most common drugs implicated in ADRs. Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders were the most common System Organ Class (SOC) involved in the ADRs. Among the 6007 reports, 19.2% were serious ADRs. Most of the ADR reports were of possible causality followed by probable and certain as per WHO UMC and Naranjo causality scales. Only ten ADRs were preventable and one reaction (Tamoxifen-induced neuropathy) was eligible for signal detection. Disproportionality analysis using a 2x2 contingency table showed insignificant signal detection using the Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR) and Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR). Analysis of ADRs from an ADR Monitoring center functioning in a tertiary care hospital shows antineoplastic drugs to be the most common drugs associated with adverse drug reactions, with rash being the most common adverse effect. The majority of the ADRs were not preventable. No Signals of Disproportionate Reporting (SDR) were detected in our study.

Adverse events associated with herbal medicine products reported in the Korea Adverse Event Reporting System from 2012 to 2021.

Systematic collection of diverse adverse events during herbal medicine administration is crucial. The Korea Adverse Event Reporting System (KAERS) compiles spontaneously reported adverse event data for medicinal products including herbal medicines. This study focused on extracting and analyzing adverse event data specifically related to herbal medicine products from the KAERS database. Individual case safety reports (ICSRs) encompassing 84 types of herbal medicine products, identified by item codes from 2012 to 2021, were extracted from the KAERS database. Descriptive statistics were employed to analyze the characteristics of the extracted reports, and adverse event information was systematically categorized and analyzed based on the MedDRA System Organ Class and preferred term classification. In total, 1,054 ICSRs were extracted, with some documenting multiple adverse events in a single ICSR, resulting in 1,629 extracted adverse events. When categorized by the MedDRA System Organ Class, gastrointestinal disorders were the most prevalent (28.7%), followed by skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders (20.1%). Based on the preferred terms, the most frequently reported adverse events were diarrhea (5.8%), urticaria (5.3%), pruritus (4.7%), rash (4.4%), and abdominal discomfort (4.2%). The most frequently reported herbal medicines were Bangpungtongseong-san (297 cases), Kyeongok-go (144 cases), and Eunkyo-san (108 cases). Spontaneously reported adverse events associated with herbal medicine products were systematically documented using the KAERS database. This study, which focused on voluntarily reported adverse reactions, underscores the need for additional research to estimate the incidence rate of adverse events and assess causality.

Do the Special Education Regulations in States Requiring RtI for SLD Identification Include or Omit Intervention Fidelity?

This study examined intervention fidelity (IF) and the extent to which this essential feature of response to intervention (RtI) was included within artifacts (laws and guidance documents) for states requiring RtI for specific learning disability (SLD) identification. Intervention fidelity is defined as the degree to which an intervention is implemented as planned. Artifacts from all U.S. states were reviewed. Twelve states were identified as requiring RtI for SLD identification, and they comprised the sample for the study. Using state department of education websites, artifacts for the 12 states were found and reviewed for any information on preferred terms (fidelity or integrity), definition, IF dimensions (adherence, exposure, interventionist quality, and participant response), and methods for assessing, reporting, and evaluating IF. We found nine states used the term fidelity, four states provided explicit guidance on assessing IF, and two states provided explicit information on how often to collect IF data and what level (percent) of IF was required for intervention decision-making. Implications for state policies and practices, future directions for improving IF knowledge, application, and evaluation, and study limitations are discussed.

Mining and analysis of adverse event signals for alendronate based on the real-world data of FDA adverse event reporting system database

ABSTRACT Objective Our study aims to assess alendronate-related adverse events (AEs) from the US FDA adverse event reporting system database. Methods The AE data associated with alendronate between the first quarter of 2004 and the first quarter of 2024 were selected. Various signal quantification methods, including the ROR, PRR, BCPNN, and EBGM, were applied for analysis. Results In 34,943 reports where alendronate was the primary suspected drug for the AE, 24 affected system organ classes and 1046 significant preferred terms were identified in this study. Several significant AEs beyond drug instructions with strong signals were determined, including low turnover osteopathy, fracture delayed union, fracture nonunion, loss of anatomical alignment after fracture reduction, fracture malunion, periprosthetic fracture, carotid bruit, oral fibroma, traumatic occlusion, and phlebolith. The median time to onset of alendronate-related AEs was 306 days (interquartile range [IQR] 12–1,461 days), and the majority of cases occurred 2 years later (18.80%) and within 30 days (14.49%). Conclusions The current study detected multiple potential new AE signals for alendronate, and more clinical researches are required to further validate our results and clarify their associations.

Spanish Terms for Cleft Lip Within the United States.

To examine Spanish terms used for “cleft lip” within the United States. Perceived acceptability of these terms was also considered. An online survey was distributed to Spanish-speaking medical interpreters, clinicians, and parents of children with cleft lip. Survey questions probed demographics, language use, preferred term for “cleft lip,” and perceived acceptability of terms for cleft lip. There were 158 respondents. Significant differences were observed with profession ( P < .001) as 62.5% of medical providers used labio hendido, while 71.8% of interpreters preferred labio leporino. Perceived acceptability of terms was consistent with the term use patterns reported by respondent groups. Significant differences were also observed with geographical region ( P = .001) as 90% of respondents from the Northeast United States employed labio leporino, compared to 60% to 70% of respondents from other regions. Selection and perception of Spanish terms for “cleft lip” may differ across regions and professions. Cleft teams should invite stakeholders to discuss what terms best suit their community.

Credit where it’s due: Recognising lived experience in research authorship

ObjectiveTo identify current practice and preferences about whether and how to acknowledge authors’ lived experience when authors contribute their lived experience expertise to research outputs in the context of health and healthcare. MethodsSurveys to people with lived experience and to academic researchers who had conducted research together (via consultation, partnership or lived-experience-led). ResultsResponses from 40 academic researchers and 36 lived experience contributors were included. Most respondents (n = 23 lived experience, 63.9 %; n = 28 academic, 70 %) reported an author’s lived experience should be publicly recognised. Approximately half recommended that affiliations should highlight authors’ lived experiences (n = 24 lived experience, 66.7 %; n = 19 academic, 47.5 %).When people with lived experience had co-authored outputs, their lived experience was not always acknowledged (n = 13/20, 65 % lived experience; n = 17/32 academic, 53.1 %). ConclusionMost respondents reported that a person’s lived experience should be recognised on health-related research outputs, but this did not consistently occur in practice. Practice ImplicationsTeams planning health-related research outputs should seek input from relevant authors about their preferred practices and terms for recognising their lived experience. Unless preferred otherwise, we recommend that the lived experiences of relevant authors are acknowledged within the output and that lived experiences are presented in affiliations.

A real-world adverse events study of rimegepant from the FAERS database

ABSTRACT Background The primary objective of this research is to conduct an exhaustive evaluation of rimegepant with the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) repository. Research design and methods This study downloaded the reporting files related to rimegepant from the second quarter of 2020 to the first quarter of 2024. Disproportionality analysis was utilized to explore the relationship between rimegepant and adverse drug events (ADEs). Results This study analyzed 6659 ADE reports associated with rimegepant as the primary suspected (PS) drug. In the disproportionate analysis of system organ classes (SOCs), the significant signal for rimegepant was general disorders and administration site conditions. On the preferred terms level, 35 ADEs were identified following the exclusion. The top 5 ADEs with high signal strengths were medication overuse headache, nasal edema, tension headache, performance status decreased, and motion sickness. The most frequent ADEs were nausea, feeling abnormal, abdominal pain upper, somnolence, and hypersensitivity. In addition, we need to pay attention to the ADEs not mentioned in the instruction and clinically significant: vertigo, hyperacusis, somnolence, Raynaud’s phenomenon, motion sickness, panic attack, and fear. Conclusions This study highlights previously unrecognized safety concerns associated with the use of rimegepant. These novel safety aspects suggest that while these treatments can be effective, additional risks may need further exploration.

Real-world safety profile of zanubrutinib: a disproportionality analysis based on the FAERS database

ObjectiveZanubrutinib is a second-generation Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitor that has been approved for the treatment of several B cell malignancies. The aim of this study was to evaluate adverse events...

Language and terminology to describe transgender communities; Perspectives from people with lived experience

Background There is no consensus over the meaning of “transgender,” “trans and gender diverse,” and other terminology used to describe people with a gender different from the gender presumed or recorded for them at birth. We aimed to survey transgender (trans) individuals to understand lived experience perspectives on terminology. Methods An online cross-sectional survey of trans people currently living in Australia and aged ≥16 was conducted from June 2021 to April 2022. Demographic data and terminology preferences were ascertained through fixed-option and free-text questions. Results Of 1023 respondents with a median age of 30 years (IQR 24, 41), 37.1% were trans women, 34.9% were trans men, 27.6% were non-binary, and 0.4% had a culturally specific identity. There was no consensus regarding community-level terminology, with “trans/transgender and gender diverse” the most preferred term (21.9%), followed by “trans/transgender” (19.3%), and “gender diverse” (15.1%). The term “trans/transgender” was more preferred by trans women (27.9%), trans men (19.0%), respondents who had a history of or wanted gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT; 20.7%), and gender-affirming surgery (GAS; 20.9%), compared to non-binary respondents (8.2%), and respondents who did not want GAHT (4.9%) or GAS (13.9%). Three themes emerged from free-text responses regarding term preference: (1) Inclusivity, (2) Trans as a binary and medicalized experience, and (3) Societal understanding, accessibility, and destigmatization. Conclusion From Australian trans communities’ perspectives, the term “trans/transgender and gender diverse” was the most preferred community-level terminology to collectively describe people with a gender different from the gender presumed or recorded for them at birth. Further perspectives are needed from other cohorts internationally.

Exploring SGLT-2 inhibitors and sarcopenia in FAERS: a post-marketing surveillance study

ABSTRACT Background The sodium-dependent glucose transporters 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) is associated with body weight loss but the composition of the losing weight remains unclear. Research design and methods Disproportionality analyses, including the reporting odds ratio (ROR), the proportional reporting ratio (PRR), the Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN), and the multi- item gamma Poisson shrinker (MGPS) algorithms, were employed to quantify the signals of SGLT-2i-associated musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders AEs. Results The search retrieved a total of 3,206 cases of musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorder-related AEs during the reporting period. This included 1,061 cases for Canagliflozin, 1,052 cases for Dapagliflozin, 1,074 cases for Empagliflozin, and 19 cases for Ertugliflozin. Fifteen preferred terms (PTs) with significant disproportionality were retained. No musculoskeletal and connective tissue system-related AE signals were reported for Ertugliflozin. We identified a risk of muscle necrosis with Canagliflozin use, a risk of sarcopenia with Dapagliflozin use, and a chance of muscle atrophy with Dapagliflozin and Empagliflozin prescriptions. Most cases occurred within the first month after SGLT-2i initiation, and AEs can persist beyond 360 days of use. Conclusions Our study identified potential new musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorder-related AE signals associated with SGLT-2 inhibitors.

A real-world pharmacovigilance study using disproportionality analysis of United States Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System events for vinca alkaloids: comparing vinorelbine and Vincristine

ABSTRACT Background Vinca alkaloids are widely used in cancer treatment for their ability to target microtubule dynamics. While their efficacy in treating certain cancers is well-established, the full spectrum of their adverse event profiles remains an area of ongoing research. Methods We analyzed AEs related to vinorelbine and vincristine using a retrospective case/non-case approach with data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). We applied various algorithms to detect AE signals: the reporting odds ratio (ROR) and proportional reporting ratio (PRR) measured disproportionality and association strength; the Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN) calculated the Information Component (IC) for associations against background rates; and the multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker (MGPS) yielded empirical Bayes geometric mean (EBGM) values, accounting for reporting variability. Results Both medications significantly involve the blood and lymphatic systems, with vinorelbine reporting 401 cases in this System Organ Class (SOC), exhibiting a ROR of 17.4, PRR of 12.4, IC of 3.63, and EBGM of 12.38. An intersection analysis of Preferred Terms (PTs) has uncovered previously unreported AEs shared by both drugs, including posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome and inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion. Conclusions This analysis highlights the need for ongoing research of the risks associated with vinorelbine and vincristine.

Post-marketing safety of tralokinumab: a real-world pharmacovigilance study based on the FDA adverse event reporting system

ABSTRACT Background Tralokinumab is a fully human IgG4 monoclonal antibody targeting IL-13, used for treating atopic dermatitis. This study analyzed tralokinumab-related adverse drug events by mining the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database to provide a safety reference for clinical application. Methods Adverse drug event reports from Q1 2022 to Q2 2024 were extracted from the FAERS database. After standardizing the data, various signal detection methods were used for analysis, including ROR, PRR, BCPNN, and MGPS. Results A total of 1,820 reports of adverse events (AEs) with tralokinumab as the primary suspected drug were identified. 70 preferred terms (PTs) met the criteria across four signal detection methods, involving 11 system organ classes (SOCs). These included known adverse reactions like conjunctivitis and injection site reactions, and signals not previously reported in clinical trials, such as eye pruritus, dry eye, eye swelling, pneumonia pneumococcal, and cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Most AEs occurred within one month of initiating tralokinumab treatment. Conclusions Based on the FAERS database, this study comprehensively and systematically analyzed AE signals in tralokinumab treatment. The results enhance the understanding of tralokinumab’s safety and serve as valuable references for reducing the risk of adverse reactions during clinical use.

A Real-World Study on Adverse Reactions of Belimumab Based on the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System Database.

This investigation leverages data derived from the United States Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting (FAERS) to real-world adverse reactions associated with Belimumab, with the intention of providing guidance for safe clinical pharmacotherapy. Data encompassing adverse drug event (ADE) reports relating to Belimumab from Q1 2011 to Q4 2023 within the FAERS were extracted and analyzed using methodologies such as the reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and Multi-item Gamma Poisson Shrinker (MGPS). The study identified a total of 19 825 ADE reports where Belimumab was the primary suspect medication, with the United States constituting the majority of reporting countries (16 312 cases, or 82.28%). Patients aged 18 to 64.9 years accounted for the largest demographic (36.29%), while the proportion of female patients (77.91%) significantly surpassed that of male patients (5.03%). The analysis uncovered 184 unique Preferred Terms (PTs) across 21 System Organ Classes (SOCs). Following selection through ROR, the SOC signal strength was prioritized as follows: Systemic disorders and administration site conditions, infections and infestations, a variety of musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders, and conditions related to pregnancy, puerperium, and the perinatal period. The top five PTs for ADE reports not included in the product's labeling were hypersensitivity reactions, immunosuppression, non-vascular diseases, herpes virus infections, and Sjögren's syndrome. The top five PTs for ADE signal strength not included in the labeling were disseminated cutaneous herpes zoster, herpes zoster meningitis, onycholysis, cyclothymic disorder, and mixed connective tissue disease. Based on pharmacovigilance research utilizing the FAERS database, it is recommended that clinical monitoring of Bevacizumab should be intensified to support effective pharmaceutical care and ensure rational clinical medication use.

Adverse Event Assessment of Upadacitinib: A Pharmacovigilance Study Based on the FAERS Database.

Upadacitinib, a Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor, has been approved by the FDA to treat various autoimmune conditions. This study assessed its adverse events by analyzing reports from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). FAERS data from Q3 2019 to Q4 2023 were extracted, and disproportionality analyses were conducted using four statistical measures, reporting odds ratio, proportionate reporting ratio, Bayesian confidence propagation neural network, and empirical Bayesian geometric mean. A total of 6 879 398 adverse event reports were collected, with 37 700 reports identifying upadacitinib as the "primary suspected." These reports involved 24 system organ classes and 246 preferred terms that met the criteria across all four algorithms. The distribution of adverse events was assessed separately for female and male patients. Further analysis of the top 25 preferred terms revealed that, although the system organ classes were similar between sexes, the specific adverse events differed. The adverse events were analyzed by gender, showing musculoskeletal and skin disorders were prevalent and severe in male patients, while musculoskeletal issues, infections, and abnormal laboratory tests were common in female patients. Unexpected events like trigger finger, biliary sepsis, and serious events such as oral neoplasm were also identified. This study provides real-world evidence for the safety evaluation of upadacitinib and underscores the need to monitor sex-specific adverse events. Future prospective studies are necessary to confirm these pharmacovigilance findings.

Mining of adverse event signals associated with inclisiran: a post-marketing analysis based on FAERS

ABSTRACT Background This study analyzed adverse events (AE) associated with inclisiran using the FDA’s Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) to detect and characterize relevant safety signals. Methods We retrospectively extracted AE reports from the FAERS database spanning Q1 2022 to Q2 2024. Four disproportionality analysis algorithms were employed to identify AE signals for inclisiran, with subsequent comparisons made to PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies (alirocumab/evolocumab). Additionally, we examined the characteristics and onset timing of inclisiran-related AE Results A total of 4,122 reports of inclisiran as the ‘primary suspected.’ Compared with all other drugs, the most significant system organ classe (SOC) was ‘musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders’ (ROR = 3.64, PRR = 3.19) and the most common SOC was ‘general disorders and administration site conditions’ (n = 2,769). And these two SOCs were more strongly with inclisiran than evolocumab. At the preferred term (PT) level, strong signals were detected for cellulitis gangrenous (ROR 101.29, PRR 101.27, IC 6.54, EBGM 92.91), bladder discomfort (ROR 12.61, PRR 12.61, IC 3.64, EBGM 12.48). The median onset time for inclisiran-related AEs was 43 days (interquartile range: 7–99 days). Conclusions This study enhances our understanding of AEs to inclisiran. Future research on its long-term real-world use will offer further insights into its safety.

Drug-Drug Interactions of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors: A Pharmacovigilance Study on Real-World Evidence from the EudraVigilance Database.

As the most common psychiatric symptom, depression represents a subject of high interest for the medical community. Background/Objectives: International guidelines consider selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) the first-line treatment of depression. Although having better efficacy and tolerability in comparison to tricyclic antidepressants or monoamine oxidase inhibitors, the diversity and potential severity of adverse effects and interactions manifested by SSRIs, combined with the frequency of prescriptions, lead to the necessity of evaluating real-world data. The aim of this study was to identify and evaluate the drug interactions reported in EudraVigilance (EV) for the six SSRIs representatives that are authorized in Europe: fluoxetine (FXT), fluvoxamine (FVM), citalopram (CIT), escitalopram (ESC), paroxetine (PAR) and sertraline (SER). The entire class of SSRIs was examined as a comparator to identify whether one of the representatives was more prone to reporting. Methods: Descriptive analysis and disproportionality analysis were conducted on data extracted from the EV database. Results: A total of 326,450 adverse reactions (ADRs) were reported for the SSRIs group. Approximately a quarter of these (n = 83,201; 25.46%) were reported for SER and 22.37% (n = 73,131) for PAR. Of the total ADRs reported, 2.12% (n = 6925) represent preferred terms related to drug-drug interactions (DDIs): SER (n = 1474; 22.37%), CIT (n = 1272, 19.86), and FXT (n = 1309, 19.83%). Specific ADRs related to inhibitory activity represent 0.98%, and for potentiating activity, 1.89%. Conclusions: Although representing a small value of the total ADRs, DDIs may be related to severe outcomes. Awareness should be raised for this category of ADRs that can be reduced by the joined efforts of physicians and pharmacists.

Post-marketing safety profile of solriamfetol: A real-world disproportionality analysis using FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database

Solriamfetol is a selective dopamine and noradrenalin reuptake inhibitor applied in adult patients with excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) associated with narcolepsy or obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). However, the post-marketing safety profile of solriamfetol in large number of people was unrevealed. The purpose of our study is to unravel solriamfetol's adverse events (AEs) in real-world to refine medication safety using Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. We derived the data associated with solriamfetol from FAERS between 2019 and 2023, and removed the duplicated entries. We evaluated the disproportionality of solriamfetol's AEs by reporting odds ratio (ROR), the proportional reporting ratio (PRR), the Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN) and the multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker (MGPS). Among 8,846,085 AE reports, 1659 recorded solriamfetol as the ‘primary suspected (PS)’. 74 significant disproportionality preferred terms (PTs) were retained across 27 organ systems. Moreover, 16 unexpected AEs not mentioned in the FDA label of solriamfetol were identified. Our findings provided the post-marketing safety profile of solriamfetol, highlighting potential solriamfetol's AEs. Further researches are significant to define the causality between solriamfetol and newly identified AEs.

Mining and evaluation of adverse event signals for capmatinib based on the FAERS database.

To conduct a comprehensive data analysis based on the FDA's Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) to mine possible adverse event (AE) signals of Capmatinib, providing valuable references for its clinical application. Capmatinib was the primary suspected drug in the search of FAERS database from the second quarter of 2020 to the fourth quarter of 2023. Data processing, screening, and classification were performed using methods such as the Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and Multi-item Gamma Poisson Shrinker (MGPS). A total of 1,991 AE reports directly related to Capmatinib were screened, identifying 269 Preferred Terms (PTs) involving 26 System Organ Classes (SOCs). Besides the AEs recorded in the drug label (such as edema, nausea, fatigue, and dyspnea), the study unearthed other high-risk AEs not listed in the label, including Renal and urinary disorders, Vocal cord paralysis, and Ear and labyrinth disorders. Among these, renal and urinary disorders, and ear and labyrinth disorders had a higher frequency and intensity of signals, suggesting that their mechanisms of occurrence could be a future research direction. This study uncovered new potential AEs of Capmatinib based on the FAERS database, providing reference for its safe clinical use. Special attention should be given to the occurrence of ear and labyrinth disorders and renal and urinary disorders, primarily presenting as pseudo-acute kidney injury, during treatment.

Safety assessment of KRAS (G12C) inhibitors based on the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database: A real-world pharmacovigilance study

ObjectivesKRAS (G12C) inhibitors (sotorasib and adagrasib) have approved treatment in patients with KRAS (G12C)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The post-marketing data concerning KRAS (G12C) inhibitors remain limited, and the outcomes of relevant studies are yet to yield conclusive evidence supporting the long-term safety of KRAS (G12C) inhibitors. Materials and methodsThis investigation comprehensively assessed adverse events (AEs) attributed to KRAS (G12C) inhibitors by employing advanced data mining techniques, utilizing the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). The dataset encompasses the period from the first quarter of 2021 to the first quarter of 2024. A disproportionality analysis was conducted to quantify the correlation between KRAS (G12C) inhibitors and AEs. The metrics employed for the evaluation of disproportionality comprise the reporting odds ratio (ROR), the proportional reporting ratio (PRR), the information component (IC), and the empirical Bayesian geometric mean (EBGM). ResultsA total of 2,253 and 486 reports were identified as related to sotorasib and adagrasib, with the identification of 51 and 26 preferred terms, respectively. The most frequent AEs of sotorasib comprised diarrhoea (ROR 5.27), hepatotoxicity (ROR 38.09), alanine aminotransferase increased (ROR 17.41), aspartate aminotransferase increased (ROR 20.88), and hepatic function abnormal (ROR 19.88). The most common AEs of adagrasib included diarrhoea (ROR 4.21), nausea (ROR 3.84), vomiting (ROR 5.36), decreased appetite (ROR 4.79), and dehydration (ROR 7.00). A relatively reduced risk of hepatotoxicity but a increased risk of serious AEs in adagrasib compared to sotorasib (P < 0.001). ConclusionOur findings would provide valued evidence for healthcare professionals to recognize AEs associated with KRAS (G12C) inhibitors and differences between sotorasib and adagrasib, and guide their clinical practice.

Adverse event signal mining and severe adverse event influencing factor analysis of Lumateperone based on FAERS database.

Lumateperone has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of schizophrenia in adults since 2019, however, there is still a lack of data report on adverse reactions in real-world settings. Conducting data mining on adverse events (AEs) associated with Lumateperone and investigating the risk factors for serious AEs can provide valuable insights for its clinical practice. AE reports in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) from 2019 Q4 (FDA approval of Lumateperone) to 2024 Q1 were collected and analyzed. Disproportionality in Lumateperone-associated AEs was evaluated using the following parameters: Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and Multi-item Gamma Poisson Shrinker (MGPS). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify the risk factors for Lumateperone-induced severe AEs. A total of 2,644 reports defined Lumateperone as the primary suspected drug was collected, including 739 reports classified as severe AEs and 1905 reports as non-severe AEs. The analysis revealed that 130 preferred terms (PTs) with significant disproportionality were based on the four algorithms, 67 (51.53%) of which were not included in the product labeling, affecting 6 systems and organs. In addition, dizziness (81 cases) was the most reported Lumateperone-associated severe AEs, and tardive dyskinesia showed the strongest signal (ROR = 186.24). Logistic regression analysis indicated that gender, bipolar II disorder, and concomitant drug use are independent risk factors for Lumateperone-associated severe AEs. Specifically, female patients had a 1.811-fold increased risk compared with male patients (OR = 1.811 [1.302, 2.519], p = 0.000), while patients with bipolar II disorder had a 1.695-fold increased risk compared with patients diagnosed with bipolar disorder (OR = 1.695 [1.320, 2.178], p = 0.000). Conversely, concomitant use of CYP3A4 inhibitors or drugs metabolized by CYP3A4 was associated with a decreased risk of severe AEs (OR = 0.524 [0.434, 0.633], P = 0.000). Collectively, this study provides critical insights into the safety profile of Lumateperone. It highlights the need for cautious use in high-risk populations, such as females and individuals with bipolar II disorder, and emphasizes the importance of monitoring for AEs, including dizziness and tardive dyskinesia. Healthcare also should remain alert to potential AEs not listed in the prescribing information to ensure medical safety.