Abstract Introduction Despite the prevalence and availability of HIV (Pre-exposure Prophylaxis i.e., PrEP), the number of new AIDS diagnoses continues to outpace treatment and prevention. Stigma, discrimination, lack of access continue to remain significant barriers in the prevention of new HIV infections, especially amongst vulnerable groups (i.e. LGBTQ, women, and minorities). We present a novel strategy to address a comprehensive approach to sexual health medicine through the partnership of Urology, Infectious Disease, and Pelvic Floor therapy. Objective Men who have sex with men (M2M) who either currently use or have an interests in use of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) continue to face barriers with respect to access to care, stigma, and or availability of effective partnerships to address and offer culturally competent care. The objective of this study is to assess attitudes and barriers to conventional and novel PrEP offerings as well as to present an innovative team approach between Urology, Infectious Disease (ID) Medicine and Pelvic Floor Therapy to offer a comprehensive multidisciplinary approach to treatment and care. Methods We enrolled 6 candidates (M2M) into our PrEP clinic which offers the Apretude (Cabotegivir 600 mg/3mL) injections. We conducted interviews, focused groups, and provided questionnaires to detail their experiences, beliefs, attitudes, barriers, and considerations for therapy. Results First, the preliminary results and findings of our study has shown that the needs, considerations, and beliefs of M2M is more varied, nuanced, and divergent with need to characterize, understand, and offer more specific culturally competent care in Sexual Health Medicine with respect to PrEP. Second, M2M designation does not exclude men from having sex with the opposite gender. These man preferred injectable PrEP option. Third, the partnership of Urology, Infectious Disease and Pelvic Floor Therapy reduced barriers, increased access to care, and decreased stigma as M2M felt more comfortable in the Urological setting. Conclusions M2M patients stated hesitancy, increased stigma and “shame” in going to ID for sexual health. Additionally, for M2M who have sexual partners of the opposite sex this would further increase stigma. Urology practices are accustomed to having discussions surrounding men’s sexual health with reduced stigma. The combination of Infectious Disease has presented an innovative partnership to discuss, prevent, and treat sexuallly transmited infections amongst M2M. Disclosure No.
Read full abstract