The purpose of this paper is to review both the empirical and conceptual literature concerning trainee preferences for feedback and evaluation in clinical supervision. This unique review is based upon several separate literatures including psychology, social work, counseling, speech pathology, business, and medical training. It will discuss the importance of feedback and evaluation, their effectiveness in producing change, related supervisee preferences, the characteristics of effective and ineffective feedback and evaluation, and a step-by-step plan for providing quality feedback. Finally, it will provide results from a pilot study conducted on these topics and suggest some areas for future research. It is hoped that this paper will be useful to supervision researchers, clinical supervisors and supervisees, and training directors alike.