This study explored the preferences for different types of family forms of people who were not practicing alternative life styles. A Q sort of 10 family forms was given to 128 subjects. Each subject ranked in order the 10 family forms according to which family form he believed would afford him the maximum personal growth as an individual striving to live up to his full human potential. Then each subject ranked in order the 10 family forms according to which family form he believed he could most feasibly adopt in his present social context and with his present relationships. Subjects differed according to sex, marital status, university affiliation, and geographical region. Results indicated that the most important variable was university affiliation. Female, married, and nonuniversity subjects chose more traditional family forms, while male, single, and university‐ affiliated subjects chose more extreme family forms. The subjects' feasibility rankings of the 10 alternative family forms were more traditional than were their maximum growth rankings.