Communication Preferences Research Articles

Ticks and lyme disease in natural areas: A segmentation analysis of visitor perceptions of risk and preferred communication strategies

Reported Lyme disease cases have been rapidly increasing globally in recent years. Despite this, few studies have explored how the public perceives health risks associated with ticks and Lyme disease, especially within the context of visitor experiences in natural areas. To address this knowledge gap, we conducted a survey of visitors to one of Ontario, Canada’s most visited provincial parks. Despite high perceptions of risk, few visitors feel sufficiently educated about ticks and Lyme disease. Further, only 51% of visitors would return to the park if future regional incidents of tick-borne illnesses increased by 10–30% (under climate change). Interestingly, no significant correlations were uncovered between home distance and tick-related risk perceptions or self-reported tick education levels. These results may be indicative of the normalization of tick-related risk throughout many of southern Ontario’s most populated regions. Finally, our results also revealed that there is no preferred “one-size-fits-all” risk communication strategy that can be used to support risk-reducing behaviour change in a natural areas context. We recommend a diversity of evidence-based, on-site, and off-site strategies, that can be considered by governing authorities not only in Canada but indeed globally to reduce tick-related health and safety risks and ultimately safeguard visitor experiences in natural areas subject to increasing tick prevalence. Management ImplicationsManagement Implications: The expanding range of ticks and increasing cases of Lyme disease are presenting significant risks to those who visit natural areas, requiring increasing management attention and action by governing authorities, including park managers and regional health units. Through a mixed-methods approach, we examined park visitor perceptions, behaviours, and preferred communication strategies regarding tick and Lyme disease risk. The results revealed a number of key findings, including:•While risk perceptions of tick bites are high, few visitors feel sufficiently educated about ticks and Lyme disease;•Only 51% of visitors would return to the park if future regional incidents of tick-borne illnesses increased by 10–30% (under climate change);•Visitors with further travel distances were significantly less likely to return to the park after experiencing an in-park tick bite; and,•There is no preferred “one-size-fits-all” risk communication strategy within a park visitor context.

Feeling phony online – The impostor phenomenon's link to online self-presentation, self-esteem, and social network site use

This study examined the relationship between the impostor phenomenon, self-esteem, online self-presentation, and social network site usage across Instagram, Facebook, TikTok, LinkedIn, and Tinder. The sample consisted of n = 541 individuals (46 % men; Mage = 27, SDage = 8.5). In addition to demographics, quantitative social network site use metrics, and self-esteem, the impostor expression emerged as an incremental predictor for the online self-presentation facets adaptable self (β = 0.26, p < .001), authentic self (β = −0.29, p < .001) and freedom of self online (β = 0.25, p < .001). Self-esteem partially mediated the impostor expression's effect on the authentic self. Findings suggest that a high impostor expression links to lower online authenticity, higher online self-adaption, and a preference for online communication and self-presentation.

"I found out about Zika virus after she was born." Women's experiences of risk communication during the Zika virus epidemic in Brazil, Colombia, and Puerto Rico.

Providing accurate, evidence-based information to women with Zika infection during pregnancy was problematic because of the high degree of uncertainty in the diagnosis of the infection and the associated risk. The 2015-17 Zika virus epidemic overwhelmingly affected women in countries with limited access to safe abortion. Understanding women's perspectives on risk communication during pregnancy in the context of an emerging pathogen can help inform risk communication in response to future outbreaks that affect fetal or child development. We conducted a cross-sectional qualitative interview study with 73 women from 7 locations in Brazil, Colombia, and Puerto Rico to understand women's experiences of Zika virus (ZIKV) test and outcome-related communication during the ZIKV pandemic. We used thematic analysis to analyze the in-depth interviews. Participants in Brazil and Colombia reported that the healthcare system's lack of preparation and organization in communicating ZIKV test results and associated adverse outcomes led to their feeling abandoned and alone in confronting the challenges of a ZIKV-affected pregnancy. In contrast, participants in Puerto Rico reported that the regular testing schedules and clear, well-planned communication between the care team and between providers and pregnant women helped them to feel they could prepare for a ZIKV-affected pregnancy. Communication of the risk associated with an emerging pathogen suspected to affect pregnancy and developmental outcomes is a fraught issue. Public health authorities and healthcare providers should work together in the interpandemic period to understand families' preferences for risk communication during pregnancy in the presence of uncertainty and develop a community-informed plan for risk communication.

Enhancing Employee Engagement Through Remote Work

This study investigates strategies to enhance employee engagement through remote work, with a focus on several critical areas such as gender diversity, targeted engagement strategies, equal support across different banks, onboarding and training for new remote workers, improving communication channels, utilizing preferred communication tools, combatting feelings of disconnection, enhancing managerial support, improving collaboration and teamwork, addressing comfortability with tools, recognizing and appreciating contributions, improving overall job satisfaction, and addressing common challenges. The research draws on data from employees at ICICI Bank and HDFC Bank to provide comprehensive recommendations for improving remote work experiences and outcomes. KEYWORDS - Employee Engagement, Remote Work, Telecommunication, Virtual Teams, Work from Home, Remote Work, Managerial Support.

Doctors' Personal Preference and Adoption of Mobile Apps to Communicate with Patients in China: Qualitative Study.

Different kinds of mobile apps are used to promote communications between patients and doctors. Studies have investigated patients' mobile app adoption behavior; however, they offer limited insights into doctors' personal preferences among a variety of choices of mobile apps. This study aimed to investigate the nuanced adoption behaviors among doctors in China, which has a robust adoption of mobile apps in health care, and to explore the constraints influencing their selection of specific mobile apps. This paper addressed 3 research questions: (1) Which doctors opt to adopt mobile apps to communicate with patients? (2) What types of mobile apps do they choose? (3) To what degree do they exercise personal choice in adopting specific mobile apps? We used thematic content analysis of qualitative data gathered from semistructured interviews with 11 doctors in Hangzhou, which has been recognized for its advanced adoption of mobile technology in social services, including health care services. The selection of participants was purposive, encompassing diverse departments and hospitals. In total, 5 themes emerged from the data analysis. First, the interviewees had a variety of options for communicating with patients via mobile apps, with the predominant ones being social networking apps (eg, WeChat) and medical platforms (eg, Haodf). Second, all interviewees used WeChat to facilitate communication with patients, although their willingness to share personal accounts varied (they are more likely to share with trusty intermediaries). Third, fewer than half of the doctors adopted medical platforms, and they were all from tertiary hospitals. Fourth, the preferences for in-person, WeChat, or medical platform communication reflected the interviewees' perceptions of different patient cohorts. Lastly, the selection of a particular kind of mobile app was significantly influenced by the doctors' affiliation with hospitals, driven by their professional obligations to fulfill multiple tasks assigned by the hospitals or the necessity of maintaining social connections with their colleagues. Our findings contribute to a nuanced understanding of doctors' adoption behavior regarding specific types of mobile apps for patient communication, instead of addressing such adoption behavior of a wide range of mobile apps as equal. Their choices of a particular kind of app were positioned within a social context where health care policies (eg, limited funding for public hospitals, dominance of public health care institutions, and absence of robust referral systems) and traditional culture (eg, trust based on social connections) largely shape their behavioral patterns.

The Role of Culturally Appropriate Mediated Communication Strategies to Reduce Hepatitis B and Liver Cancer Disparities

Asian, Pacific Islander, African, and Caribbean communities in the U.S. are heavily impacted by chronic hepatitis B (HBV) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Educating these groups about the link between the two diseases is imperative to improve screening rates and health outcomes. This study aims to identify and incorporate preferred mediated communication methods into community-specific educational campaigns which emphasize the connection between the conditions, to promote uptake of prevention and management behaviors for HBV and HCC. Fifteen focus groups and two key informant interviews were conducted with Micronesian, Chinese, Hmong, Nigerian, Ghanaian, Vietnamese, Korean, Somali, Ethiopian, Filipino, Haitian, and Francophone West African communities. Data were analyzed using thematic coding and analysis. Findings demonstrate that all communities preferred materials be offered in both English and native languages and requested that materials highlight the connection between HBV and HCC. Delivery channel preferences and messaging themes varied by group. This study provides insight into community-specific preferences for learning about HBV and HCC. The findings can be used to design culturally and linguistically tailored, multi-platform, health education campaigns to facilitate improved HBV screening and vaccination rates and increase knowledge about HCC risk among highly impacted communities in the U.S.

Computer-mediated Communication and Healthcare Satisfaction among Middle-aged Men Living with or without HIV

Introduction Computer-mediated communication has a multifaceted effect on health care satisfaction. This relationship has not been studied among middle-aged men living with HIV. The current study extracted data from the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study (MACS) to examine the association between computer-mediated communication and health care satisfaction. Methods The MACS is a prospective study of more than 7000 sexual minority men living with and without HIV. The Understanding Patterns of Healthy Aging Among Men Who Have Sex With Men was a substudy of the MACS. Current analyses use cross-sectional data on 1063 participants from this substudy with survey data between October 2017 and March 2018. Patients ranked their top 3 methods for communicating with someone they trust. Latent class analysis was used to create classes of health care satisfaction. Multinomial logistic regression was used to estimate the effect of primary communication method on health care satisfaction class membership. Covariates included age, HIV status, race and ethnicity, education, and comorbidities. Interaction was tested between HIV serostatus and primary communication method. Results Regardless of HIV status, participants preferred in-person communication over computer-mediated communication and were satisfied with the health care they received. Participants who preferred computer-mediated communication were more likely to have low health care satisfaction. There was a statistically nonsignificant association of HIV status with preferred communication method and health care satisfaction. Conclusions We postulated that in-person communication promoted high health care satisfaction due to the process of rewarding face-to-face communication through the exchange of both verbal and nonverbal cues. However, patients’ preference of communication mode may be moderated by the context of consultation.

“Let’s put it this way: you can’t really live without it” - digital technologies in routine palliative care delivery: an explorative qualitative study with patients and their family caregivers in Germany

BackgroundDespite ongoing efforts to integrate palliative care into the German healthcare system, challenges persist, particularly in areas where infrastructure does not fully support digital technologies (DT). The increasing importance of digital technology (DT) in palliative care delivery presents both opportunities and challenges.ObjectiveThis study aimed to explore the perspectives and preferences of palliative care patients and their family caregivers regarding the use of DT in care delivery.MethodsAn exploratory qualitative study was conducted using semi-structured interviews with palliative care patients and their family caregivers across various settings. Participants were selected through gatekeeper-supported purposive sampling. Interviews were analysed using structured qualitative content analysis.ResultsNineteen interviews were conducted.Three themes emerged: (1) Application of DTs in palliative care; (2) Potential of DTs; (3) Barriers to the use of DTs. Key findings highlighted the preference for real-time communication using DTs that participants are familiar with. Participants reported limited perceived value for digital transformation in the presence of in-person care. The study identified requirements for DT development and use in palliative care, including the need for direct and immediate functionality, efficiency in healthcare professional (HCP) work, and continuous access to services.ConclusionThe findings highlight a demonstrate the importance of familiarity with DTs and real-time access for patients and their families. While DT can enhance palliative care efficiency and accessibility, its integration must complement, not replace, in-person interaction in palliative care. As DTs continue to grow in scope and use in palliative care, maintaining continued user engagement is essential to optimise their adoption and ensure they benefit patients and their caregivers.

Zika Virus Infection Knowledge and Communication Preferences Among Women of Reproductive Age in Central Brooklyn, New York: A Thematic Analysis.

The 2016 outbreak of Zika virus (ZIKV) infected millions and resulted in thousands of infants born with malformations. Though the clusters of severe birth defects resulting from this outbreak have subsided, ZIKV continues to be a concern throughout much of Latin America and the Caribbean. Travel and sexual intercourse remain the dominant transmission risk factors for women of reproductive age and their partners. This is particularly true for communities in Brooklyn, New York, that comprise large immigrant and foreign-born populations. Practitioners of public health understand little about how women at risk for ZIKV are most likely to receive information about the virus or who they trust most to provide that information. In the context of five focus group discussions, this study explored the knowledge and communication preferences of 20 women of reproductive age in Central Brooklyn. Results derived from a thematic analysis suggest that while most women are familiar with mosquitos as ZIKV vectors, knowledge of sexual transmission is considerably lower. Many respondents believe that only women who are pregnant or trying to become pregnant are at risk, and public health agencies, such as the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, remain the most trusted sources of information. These findings can support more effective communication about the risks of ZIKV infection and other vector-borne diseases to women in New York City and similar urban communities.

Healthcare without borders: Creating a shared medical decision-making model to support global patients at Northwestern Memorial Hospital

Individuals from across the globe increasingly elect to travel to the USA for the primary purpose of receiving healthcare. These border crossings create opportunities for rich cultural exchange, as well as for direct conflict between the basic values and preferences of global patients and their healthcare team(s). A series of ethics cases at Northwestern Memorial Hospital, where clinicians were morally distressed by the request of families of global patients to withhold medical information about life-threatening disease from the patient, led to a new partnership between the International Health and Medical Ethics teams. This paper describes the development, implementation and outcome of that creative collaboration: an innovative upstream preventive ethics initiative that honours the primary obligation of Western healthcare providers to uphold informed consent and patient autonomy while honouring a wide scope of preferences in communication and decision making identified among this patient population.

Let Us Have the Conversation: Serious Illness Communication in Oncology: Definitions, Barriers, and Successful Approaches.

Serious illness communications are crucial elements of care delivery for patients with cancer. High-quality serious illness communications are composed of open, honest discussions between patients, caregivers, and clinicians regarding patient's communication preferences, expected illness trajectory, prognosis, and risks and benefits of any recommended care. High-quality communication ideally starts at the time of a patients' cancer diagnosis, allows space for and response to patient emotions, elicits patients' values and care preferences, and is iterative and longitudinal. When integrated into cancer care, such communication can result in improved patient experiences with their care, care that matches patients' goals, and reduced care intensity at the end of life. Despite national recommendations for routine integration of these communication into cancer care, a minority of patients with cancer receive such communication. In this chapter, we describe elements of high-quality serious illness communication, patient-, clinician-, institution-, and payer-level barriers, and successful strategies that can routinely integrate such communication into cancer care delivery.

Nonepisodic autobiographical memory details reflect attempts to tell a good story.

A persistent finding in the autobiographical memory (AM) literature is that older adults report more nonepisodic (or generalized/semantic) information than young adults. Since studies are usually focused on memory for episodic (or specific) autobiographical events, the reason for the age difference in nonepisodic AM remains understudied. This experiment investigated whether the higher rate of nonepisodic AM in older adults reflects (a) a difference incommunicative preferences or (b) cognitive decline, by way of either an inhibition deficit or as a means of compensating for a deficit in episodic AM. A sample of 54 young (N = 28, age range = 18-46) and older (N = 26, age range = 62-86) participants retrieved the same AM twice, under two different sets of instructions: to tell a good story for their autobiography, or to provide a detailed police witness statement. Both groups reported more general details when they were aiming to tell a good story. In addition, older adults also reported fewer specific details when the aim was to tell a good story. In a separate ranking task, young and older adults differed in their perceptions of what makes a good story; young adults ranked "detail," "grammar," and "full descriptions" more highly than older adults, whereas older ranked "linking ideas" and "explaining not just describing" more highly than young adults. The results suggest that age-related differences in nonepisodic AM might be explained by communicative preferences rather than cognitive decline. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Differences in politeness perception of irony and prosocial lies: Exploring the role of age, gender, and geographic location.

In daily interactions, individuals use irony and prosocial lies for various reasons, for example, to be humorous, to criticize, or to be polite. While some studies have examined individual differences in perceiving the politeness of such language, research using naturalistic, context-rich materials is lacking. To address this gap, we utilized short videos to assess politeness perception in literal, ironic, and prosocial lie scenarios while also exploring differences based on age, gender, and geographical location. Our sample included 288 participants from the United States and the United Kingdom. We focused on five different types of language: literal positive, blunt, sarcastic, teasing, and prosocial lies. Participants rated the politeness of these statements and completed surveys on communication preferences (Self-Reported Sarcasm Questionnaire and Conversational Indirectness Scale Questionnaire). While the demographic groups showed similarities, individual factors also shaped politeness perception. Older adults perceived teasing as less polite than middle-aged and younger adults, and male participants rated blunt and sarcastic statements as more polite. Geographical variations were found for prosocial lies, with U.K. participants rating them more polite than their U.S. counterparts. These findings underscore the importance of considering context-rich materials and individual factors in understanding the social functions of irony and prosocial lies. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Impact of a care delivery intervention for patients with socioeconomic disadvantages, in their preferred language of English or Spanish.

e13550 Background: Sinai Health System’s oncology program serves Chicago’s inner city patients with substantial needs for social and primary care, many of whom prefer communication in Spanish. Sinai has implemented a care delivery intervention to address these needs, using the 4R Oncology Model for patient-facing care planning and patient self-management. 4R (Right Info/Care/Patient/Time) has shown significant improvements in the timeliness of care cancer delivery and referrals to cancer care (1). Herein, we implemented the 4R intervention to improve the timeliness of care delivery and referrals to care, focusing on the social and primary care needs of Sinai patients. Methods: Evaluation was conducted by surveying historical control and intervention (4R) cohorts of patients in their preferred language of Spanish or English. The 4R cohort received care at a Sinai medical oncology clinic Apr 2023 - Jan 2024. Control cohort received care Jan 2023 – March 2023. Analyses were conducted using Fisher’s exact test. Results: Survey response: 76% (38/50) in control and 75% (33/44) in 4R cohorts. Participant characteristics were comparable between control and 4R cohorts, respectively: 55%, 58% Hispanic, 42%, 39% Black; 76%, 82% high school education or less; 87%, 97% &lt; $30k annual income; 50%, 55% preferred Spanish; 47%, 45% preferred English. For the total cohorts, all 5 metrics improved between control and 4R, and 4 of the 5 metrics improved significantly (Table). Among Spanish-preferred patients, 3 of the 5 metrics improved significantly, while improvements among English-preferred patients were not statistically significant. Both language groups saw numerical, but not statistically significant improvement in receiving referrals to primary care and meeting all their practical and family needs. Conclusions: The 4R Oncology intervention resulted in significant improvement in time to treatment and referrals to social and primary care in our population of socioeconomically disadvantaged patients with high needs for these services. Patients preferring Spanish benefited at a higher rate than English-preferring patients, indicating that 4R may be an effective method to address the needs of this important patient group. Future efforts will further optimize 4R to address remaining gaps for this group, as well as to improve the delivery of this care for the English-preferred patients. 1. Trosman JCOOP 2021. [Table: see text]

Preferences of financial discussion among cancer care physicians and patients with cancer at a government cancer center in Nepal.

e23204 Background: Good communication of disease status between treating physicians and cancer patients with shared decisions of treatment plan helps patients to choose most suitable management options which further improves their quality of care. Methods: A structured survey was conducted with all Cancer care physicians and 100 randomly selected cancer patients at Bhaktapur Cancer Hospital. Physicians were asked about their preferences for financial communication with the patients, especially before starting treatment. Patients were surveyed for their willingness and satisfaction of financial communication with cancer physicians. Frequencies and percentages were calculated. Results: 31.57% were female among responded 38 cancer physicians (95%). 44% were female among 100 selected cancer patients. Cancer physicians were from different disciplines including surgical oncology (39.47%), radiation oncology (10.52%), medical oncology (7.89%), radiology (10.52%), pathology (15.78%), anesthesia (7.89%), and others. Financial distress was the most common cause of treatment default (63.15%) followed by the prevalent cancer myth of cancer being an incurable disease (31.57%) according to the physicians. All physicians believed discussing finances improves patient compliance, but only 68.42% believed it also helps decrease patients' financial distress. 28.94% of physicians always discussed finances with all patients, 50% discussed with a few patients only, and 7.89% never discussed finances with patients. Among physicians who discussed finances with few patients only, the major reasons were queries initiated by patients (61.35%), discussion about expensive treatment options (47.36%) and discussion based on number of patients appointed per day (21.05%). The common reasons behind unwillingness of financial discussions were physicians' ignorance about the total estimated cost (34.2%), physicians' anxiousness that patients will not initiate treatment after knowing the estimated cost (22.72%), and unawareness of possible consequences of discussion (7%). During the financial discussion, the most common discussion were about the information on government subsidies (53.33%), followed by the total estimated cost (40%), and queries about the source of money for treatment (26.66%). On the other part, 91% patients were willing for good cost communication with cancer physicians but only 12% patients were satisfied with the cost communication they had with their treating physicians. 86% patients believed good cost communication help to manage finances during treatment and decrease their financial distress. Conclusions: Optimal financial discussion between cancer care physicians and patients is lacking in our setup, which may be the important contributory cause to financial distress for patients and their families leading to non compliance to treatment.

Patient-centered development and dissemination of MTCEducate.org, an online educational aid for patients with a rare cancer.

e13655 Background: Patients with rare cancers are subject to clinical vulnerability due to limited access to expert clinicians, equivocal treatment options, and a lack of accessible, reliable information. Medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) is a rare cancer often characterized by an advanced, progressive, chronic disease state for which there is clinical equipoise in treatment decisions. In a previous needs assessment, we learned from MTC patients, their caregivers, and treating physicians about the desire for education at each disease stage and strategies to convey patients' priorities to clinicians. Here, we report the patient-centered development of a novel online educational resource and decision aid, MTCEducate.org, its dissemination, and an analysis of its usability and acceptability. Methods: Working with a stakeholder group of MTC patients, caregivers, and clinicians, we used our prior needs assessment results to guide development and refinement of MTCEducate.org, including storyboarding and iterative patient feedback. The finalized site was strategically promoted through patient support organizations, a patient-run Facebook group, the American Thyroid Association, multiple conferences, and a robust MTC Registry listserv. Site metrics were assessed via Google Analytics, and site usability and acceptability were evaluated via an online survey with Likert scale questions. Results: MTCEducate.org underwent 5 rounds of patient feedback with 11 patients total to achieve saturation and finalization. Over its first 9 months, the site had 1878 unique visitors; of these, 65% used a mobile device to visit the site, and 35% used a desktop computer or tablet. Visitors accessed the site most often via direct emails or newsletters (49%) and Facebook (49%). Seventy-one visitors fully completed the site usability and acceptability survey. Most respondents identified as women (76%) and as non-Hispanic White (91%). The majority were ≥45 years old (87%) and had an associate’s degree or higher (93%). Most were MTC patients or survivors (91.8%), and most responded correctly to MTC knowledge–based questions about tumor markers (96%), lymph node dissection (94%), and FDA-approved medications (71%). Most found the site easy to use (88%) and well-integrated (84%), and most could learn to use it quickly (86%) and confidently (81%). Conclusions: Patients, especially those with rare tumors, need trustworthy educational and decision aids that provide evidence-based, reliable information and support shared decision-making. Using a patient-centered approach, we created a product whose multipronged deployment reached a unique audience. The site’s visitors’ lack of racial and ethnic diversity as well as their advanced educational status underscores the need to understand preferred access, communication, and educational resources desired by underrepresented populations.

Assessment of determinant factors responsible for divorce among divorcees in rural areas of Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria

The study assessed factors responsible for divorce among divorcees in rural areas of Ibadan by specifically focusing on sexual satisfaction, ethnicity/culture, and educational disparities. Divorce is related to marriage and family, and it has been used as an instrument to expose failure through marriage. In Nigeria, the high rate of divorce is mostly associated with urbanization and industrialization. The study employed a multi-stage sampling procedure using a well-structured and closed-ended questionnaire. Three out of six rural local government areas were randomly selected, representing 50%. 354 divorcees were randomly selected out of 3,064 divorce cases heard in the last 4 years using the Taro Yamane formula. The collected data were analysed through descriptive statistics (frequency and percentage) and inferential statistics (chi square). The study revealed that more than half of the respondents admitted that sexual intercourse brings peace to their family, while 52% disagreed that ethnicity has to do with divorce. Therefore, sexual activities between the couple must be set as a priority, with respect for one another's as well as unique cultural beliefs, customs, and communication preferences.

Social lack of communication and technological development

The development of today's society imposes the challenge of incorporating information and communication technologies (ICT), which has favored the productivity and efficiency of business processes, generally leading them to have better levels of profitability. This technological development can consider the media as an instrument of collective socialization, however, the process of digital virtualization is causing a fracture between the real and virtual world, a model of coexistence typical of globalized societies, characterized by extreme individualization and the virtualization of the communicative experience, we do not face the society of lack of communication, considering it as a process that prevents a fluid and healthy two-way interpersonal relationship. The article raises the hypothesis that we live in the century of individualization, of the loss of human relationships, caused by the spell caused by new technologies and that promotes detachment between people and the excessive preference for virtual communication.

Preferred sources of information on diabetes prevention programmes: a population-based cross-sectional study in Poland

ObjectiveThis study aimed to analyse preferred sources of information on diabetes prevention programmes and to identify sociodemographic determinants influencing these preferences among adults in Poland.DesignA cross-sectional survey was carried out...

Print Grades Prime: A quantitative analysis of producer communication preferences of U.S. beef breed association magazines through the lenses of uses, gratifications, and gatekeeping

Print Grades Prime: A quantitative analysis of producer communication preferences of U.S. beef breed association magazines through the lenses of uses, gratifications, and gatekeeping