Pre-existing Autoimmune Disease Research Articles

Adalimumab induced CNS demyelination in a patient with multiple pre-existing autoimmune diseases; treatment contemplation.

Anti-TNF agents like Adalimumab are safe and effective for rheumatologic disorders, but they have been reported to cause demyelinating diseases like Multiple Sclerosis (MS). A 47-year-old woman with left hand weakness was evaluated. She had a previous medical history of Intermediate Uveitis (IU) and Rheumatoid arthritis (RA). anti-TNF-α treatment was initiated with adalimumab two years before this visit. MRI showed numerous T2-hyperintense lesions in bilateral periventricular, juxtacortical, and subcortical areas, which were absent in her scan before anti-TNF therapy. She was diagnosed with MS, and Adalimumab was discontinued. IV glucocorticoids (GCs) were administered with marked improvement. She was then started on anti-CD20 therapy with Rituximab. A year later, she was symptom-free, and her follow-up Brain MRI showed no new lesions. The link between MS and TNF-α inhibitors is poorly understood, but several hypotheses have been proposed. Discontinuing anti-TNF therapy alone may not be enough to prevent further demyelinating disease activity, and it is essential to consider the necessity of starting a disease-modifying treatment. Autoimmunity plays a significant role in rheumatologic and neurological diseases, and as personalized medicine advances, understanding genetic risk is crucial for selecting appropriate therapeutic targets. A thorough evaluation of a patient's family background is recommended before therapeutic decision-making, especially in patients with multiple autoimmune disorders, and the question of whether TNF-α is a suitable therapeutic target in patients with multiple autoimmune disorders is raised.

Endomyocardial biopsy in patients with myocarditis - still justified in the CMR era? A single-centre experience

Abstract Background Endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) is still considered the diagnostic gold standard for myocarditis. However, in the past decades, cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) was established as a non-invasive tool supporting the diagnosis of myocarditis. Furthermore, there is often reluctance in performing EMB due to rare but potentially severe complications. We therefore sought to identify patient subgroups that could potentially derive benefits from EMB. This involved a comprehensive analysis of the diagnostic and therapeutic outcomes resulting from the procedure at our centre. Methods In this retrospective single-centre study, data of all patients presenting with (peri-) myocarditis between 01/2016 and 06/2023 at our tertiary care centre were included. Frequency of histological confirmation of acute myocarditis and histology leading to immunosuppressive therapy were analysed according to patient risks. Prespecified risk factors were (i) LV-EF ≤30%, (ii) presence of severe arrhythmias (VF, VT, high grade AV-block) or (iii) pre-existing autoimmune disease. Furthermore, the subgroup of recurrent myocarditis cases was analysed separately. Results A total of 150 consecutive patients (36.7 ± 15.5 years, 77.3% male) were included in this study. 26/150 patients had a documented EF ≤30%, 13/150 an EF >30% with another risk factor and 111/150 an EF>30% without another risk factor. EMB was performed in 21/26 patients with EF ≤30% (80.7%), in 7/13 patients with EF >30% and another risk factors (53.8%) and in 16/111 (14%) patients without risk factors. EMB led to the initiation of immunosuppressive therapy in 11/28 patients with risk factors (39.3%) and in none of the patients without risk factors (0/16, 0%, p=0.003)(figure 1). With respect to the subgroup of patients presenting with recurrent myocarditis (n=10), no specific therapy was performed. Conclusion Due to a high therapeutic yield for initiation of immunosuppressive therapy in non-infectious myocarditis, performing EMB should be considered in all high-risk patients. In patients without clinical risk factors including cases of recurrent or relapsing myocarditis no specific therapy was initiated.

Development of an Educational Website for Patients With Cancer and Preexisting Autoimmune Diseases Considering Immune Checkpoint Blockers: Usability and Acceptability Study.

Patients with cancer and an underlying autoimmune disease who are considering immune checkpoint blockers (ICBs) need to know about the benefits and risks of severe immune-related adverse events and flares of the autoimmune condition. This study aims to develop and alpha test an educational website for patients with cancer. Learning topics, images, and website architecture (including flow and requirements) were developed and iteratively reviewed by members of a community scientist program, a patient advisory group, and content experts. Alpha testing was performed, measuring the site's usability using the Suitability Assessment of Materials and its acceptability using the Ottawa Acceptability Measure. The website included a home page; general information about ICBs; comprehensive modules on the benefits and risks of ICBs for patients with cancer and preexisting autoimmune diseases; general wellness information; and features such as a quiz, additional resources, and a glossary. For the alpha testing, 9 users assessed the newly developed website. Patient reviewers (n=5) had rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn disease, Sjogren syndrome, or vasculitis. Health care provider reviewers (n=4) were medical oncologists or rheumatologists. The median Suitability Assessment of Materials rating was 75 (IQR 70-79; range 0-100) for patients versus 66 (IQR 57-72; range 0-100) for providers (scores ≥70 indicate no substantial changes needed). Recommendations for improvement, mostly involving navigation and accessibility, were addressed. All participants expressed that the website was acceptable and balanced in terms of discussion of benefits and harms. Because half (2/4, 50%) of the providers suggested we increase the amount of information, we extended the content on the impact of having an autoimmune disease when considering ICB treatment, the probability of flares, and the management of flares in this context. The feedback led to minor revisions to enhance readability, navigation, and accessibility, ensuring the website's suitability as a decision-making aid. The newly developed website could become a supporting tool to facilitate patient-physician discussion regarding ICBs.

Histological analysis of the spleen of rats immunized with SARS-CoV-2 S protein

SARS-CoV-2 infection can lead to pathological disorders in various organs due to the ubiquitous of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), which serves as a receptor for SARS-CoV-2. However, tissue damage may not only be the result of viral infection. SARS-CoV-2 has been shown to induce the production of autoantibodies to ACE2, and their presence is associated with disease severity. The spleen is one of the targets for COVID-19. The presence of ACE2 in the red pulp sinus endothelium cells of the spleen and in tissue-resident CD169+ macrophages positioned in the splenic marginal zone makes these cells a potential target of autoimmune reactions to ACE2 triggered by SARS-CoV-2. In addition, antibodies to the SARS-CoV-2 S protein cross-react with a wide range of human tissue proteins and can cause tissue damage. The most common splenic pathologies in deceased COVID-19 patients are lymphocyte depletion and subsequent hemaphagocytosis. Since the spleen plays a fundamental role in the immune response regulation, splenic damage could be one of the causes of immune perturbations associated with severe COVID-19. To test the hypothesis of the autoimmune nature of COVID-19, we developed a non-infectious experimental model of autoimmune multiorgan damage caused by immunization with SARS-CoV-2 S protein. The purpose of this work was to study the spleen in rats with induced multiorgan damage caused by immunization with SARS-CoV-2 S protein, as well as the influence of pre-existing autoimmune disease on the severity of splenic damage caused by an immune response against S protein. Intact Wistar rats and Wistar rats with completed experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis were immunized with S protein in incomplete Freund’s adjuvant (IFA). Control rats received an injection of IFA. No changes were detected in the secondary follicles number in the spleen of rats immunized with the SARS-CoV-2 S protein. However, in the spleen of rats with previously induced autoimmune encephalomyelitis, immunization with SARS-CoV-2 S protein caused a significant decrease in the number of secondary follicles relative to the control group. Hemosiderin deposits and macrophage hyperplasia of the marginal zones of the white pulp were detected in both groups immunized with S protein. Thus, immunization with the S protein of SARS-CoV-2 causes changes in the spleen of rats similar to those detected in patients who died from COVID-19. Damage to the spleen is more varied and pronounced in rats with previous experimental encephalomyelitis.

The effect of the immune response to SARS-CoV-2 S protein on angiotensin II levels in rats

Autoantibodies against key molecules of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) are found in some patients infected with SARS-CoV-2. These autoantibodies include antibodies against angiotensin II and angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2). The presence of antibodies to the RAS-related molecules is associated with episodes of hypotension or hypertension. The aim of this work was to study the effect of antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 S protein and autoantibodies to ACE2 on angiotensin II levels in a model of induced multiple organ damage caused in rats by immunization with SARS-CoV-2 S protein. The effect of pre-existing autoimmune encephalomyelitis on change in angiotensin II level caused by immunization with S protein is also was studied. Wistar rats were immunized with S protein of SARS-CoV-2 emulsified in incomplete Freund’s adjuvant (IFA). At the time of injection of S protein 6 of the rats were intact (S group), in 4 of the rat experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis was previously induced by immunization with guinea pig myelin basic protein (EAE + S group). The control group of rats was injected with IFA. Antibodies to S protein, autoantibodies to ACE2, and angiotensin II level were determined in blood plasma by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay. It was found that immunization with S protein leads to a transient decrease in the blood level of angiotensin II. The blood angiotensin II level was lower than normal in 3 out of 6 rats (50%) in group S, and in 3 out of 4 (75%) in the EAE + S group at week 6 after immunization. The decrease in angiotensin II level was significant in the EAE + S group relative to the control group (ANOVA, p = 0.0423). A deeper decrease in the angiotensin II level in the blood of EAE + S group than in S group was associated with a higher level of antibodies to S protein: the level of antibodies to S protein was significantly higher in the EAE + S group for 1-6 weeks after immunization with S protein compared to the S group of rats. Immunization of rats with S protein did not cause the production of anti-ACE2 autoantibodies in the EAE + S group, and in the S group it was weak and was not accompanied by an increase in angiotensin II levels. Thus, in rats immunized with S protein, a transient decrease in the level of angiotensin II was detected at the peak of production of antibodies to S protein, which may indicate that antibodies to S protein may contribute to a decrease in angiotensin II level in SARS-CoV-2 infection. In addition, pre-existing autoimmune disease leads to a stronger response to S protein, accompanied by a stronger decrease in angiotensin II level.

Flap-Based Reconstruction in Patients with Autoimmune Disease: An Institutional Experience with the Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap and Review of the Literature.

Autoimmune diseases are associated with characteristic chronic inflammation, aberrations in tissue perfusion, and hypercoagulability, and thus have considerable implications for local and free-flap reconstruction. We seek to summarize the current evidence on outcomes of flap-based reconstruction in patients with pre-existing autoimmune disease and present our experience with autologous breast reconstruction in this population. PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science were searched for relevant articles, and pertinent data were presented qualitatively. Institutional data were queried for patients who underwent autologous breast reconstruction with deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps between 2015 and 2024. A retrospective review was conducted to identify DIEP patients with a history of autoimmune disease. Data on patient demographics, medication history, flap outcomes, and perioperative complications were collected. The majority of existing studies found no increased independent risk of flap complications. However, other complications, predominantly wound dehiscence, were independently associated with autoimmune disease. Regarding immunosuppressant therapy, the literature demonstrated that perioperative glucocorticoid use was consistently associated with all complications, including seroma, infection, wound disruption, and partial flap loss.Our 13-patient institutional experience identified no cases of total flap loss or microvascular thrombotic complications. There was one case of partial flap necrosis further complicated by abdominal site cellulitis, and one case of recipient-site dehiscence managed with local wound care. No patients required re-operation for flap or donor-site complications. The literature suggests that flap reconstruction can be performed safely in patients with autoimmune conditions, which was also supported by our institutional experience. While there is likely minimal risk of microsurgical complications in the context of free tissue transfer, donor-site morbidity and wound dehiscence remain major concerns for patients with a history of autoimmune disease. Limiting the use of immunosuppressive agents, especially corticosteroids, may potentially improve outcomes of flap reconstruction.

1389P Safety and effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in patients with lung cancer and pre-existing autoimmune disease

1389P Safety and effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in patients with lung cancer and pre-existing autoimmune disease

Anti-OJ antibody-positive anti-synthetase syndrome following SARS-CoV-2 infection: a case report and literature review

BackgroundCOVID-19 can induce a systemic inflammatory response with variable clinical manifestations. Similar to various viruses, COVID-19 has been implicated in the pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases. This article highlights the potential for infections including the SARS-CoV-2 virus to induce exacerbations of pre-existing autoimmune diseases or even potentially unmask de novo autoimmune diseases in particular anti-synthetase syndrome (ASSD) in predisposed individuals. Although there are other case reports of ASSD following SARS-CoV-2 infection, here we present the first reported case of a gentleman with a newly diagnosed anti-OJ positive anti-synthetase syndrome following SARS-CoV-2 infection.Case presentationDescribed is a case of a 70-year-old man presenting to the emergency department with worsening dyspnea in the context of a recent COVID-19 infection. CT-chest revealed changes suggestive of fibrotic lung disease, consistent with usual interstitial pneumonitis (UIP) pattern. Despite recovery from his COVID-19 illness, the patient subsequently developed proximal myopathy with cervical flexion weakness on further assessment with persistently elevated creatinine kinase (CK). Myositis autoantibodies found a strongly positive anti-OJ autoantibody with MRI-STIR and muscle biopsy performed to further confirm the diagnosis. The patient received pulse methylprednisolone 1 g for 3 days with a long oral prednisolone wean and in view of multiple end-organ manifestations, loading immunoglobulin at 2 g/kg administered over two days was given. In addition, he was then commenced and escalated to a full dose of azathioprine given a normal purine metabolism where he remains in clinical remission to this date. At least 267 cases of rheumatic diseases has been associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection as well as COVID-19 vaccination. A literature search on PubMed was made to determine the amount of case reports describing myositis associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection. We found 3 case reports that fit into our inclusion criteria. Further literature searches on diagnostic approach and treatment of ASSD were done.ConclusionAlthough SARS-CoV-2 infection itself can cause a directly mediated viral myositis, this case report highlights the possibility of developing virus-triggered inflammatory myositis through multiple aforementioned proposed mechanisms. Therefore, further studies are required to explore the relationship and pathophysiology of SARS-CoV-2 infection and the incidence of inflammatory myopathies.

Pregnancy complications and new-onset maternal autoimmune disease.

Autoimmune diseases disproportionately impact women and female-specific aspects of reproduction are thought to play a role. We investigated the time-varying association between pregnancy complications and new-onset autoimmune disease in females during the reproductive and midlife years. We conducted a population-based cohort study of 1704553 singleton births to 1072445 females in Ontario, Canada (2002-17) with no pre-existing autoimmune disease. Pregnancy complications were preeclampsia, stillbirth, spontaneous preterm birth and severe small for gestational age (SGA). Royston-Parmar models were used to estimate the time-varying association between pregnancy complications and a composite of 25 autoimmune diseases from date of delivery to date of autoimmune disease diagnosis or censoring at death, loss of health insurance, or 31 March 2021. Models were adjusted for baseline socio-demographics, parity and comorbidities. At 19 years (median = 10.9 years of follow-up), cumulative incidence of autoimmune disease was 3.1% in those with a pregnancy complication and 2.6% in those without complications. Adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) curves as a function of time since birth were generally L-shaped. Universally, risks were most elevated within the first 3 years after birth [at 1 year: preeclampsia AHR 1.22, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.09-1.36; stillbirth AHR 1.36, 95% CI 0.99-1.85; spontaneous preterm birth AHR 1.30, 95% CI 1.18-1.44; severe SGA AHR 1.14, 95% CI 0.99-1.31] and plateaued but remained elevated thereafter. Prior history of pregnancy complications may be an important female-specific risk factor to consider during clinical assessment of females for possible autoimmune disease to facilitate timely detection and treatment.

Does an Autoimmune Disorder Following Ovarian Cancer Diagnosis Affect Prognosis?

We investigated whether developing an autoimmune disorder (AID) following a high-grade epithelial ovarian cancer diagnosis improves overall survival. This retrospective study included data from women treated for high-grade serous, endometrioid, or transitional cell ovarian, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancer FIGO stage III or IV at a Swiss cantonal gynecological cancer center (2008-2023). We used Kaplan-Meier estimates and the Cox proportional hazards model using time-varying covariates for the survival function estimation. In all, 9 of 128 patients developed an AID following a cancer diagnosis. The median time from cancer diagnosis to AID was 2 years (IQR 2-5). These women survived for a median of 3031 days (IQR 1765-3963) versus 972 days (IQR 568-1819) for those who did not develop an AID (p = 0.001). The median overall survival of nine women with a pre-existing AID was 1093 days (IQR 716-1705), similar to those who never had an AID. The multivariate analyses showed older age (p = 0.003, HR 1.04, 95% CI 1.013-1.064) was associated with a poorer prognosis, and developing an AID after a cancer diagnosis was associated with longer survival (p = 0.033, HR 0.113, 95% CI 0.015-0.837). Clinical manifestations of autoimmune disorders following ovarian cancer diagnoses were associated with better overall survival (8 versus 2.7 years), indicating an overactive immune response may improve cancer control.

Checkpoint Inhibitor-Induced Autoimmune Diabetes: An Autoinflammatory Disease.

Immunomodulatory agents targeting immune checkpoints are now the state-of-the-art for the treatment of many cancers, but at the same time have led to autoimmune side effects, including autoimmune diabetes: immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced diabetes (CPI-DM). Emerging research shows the importance of preexisting autoimmune disease risk that has been identified through genetics, and autoantibodies. Key associated clinical findings also include increased levels of lipase before diagnosis suggesting that the inflammatory process in the pancreas extends beyond the islets of Langerhans. There is selectivity for the blockade of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) for this adverse event, consistent with the role of this checkpoint in maintaining tolerance to autoimmune diabetes.

Pre-existing autoimmune disease as a risk factor for immune-related adverse events in cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been widely used as standard therapies for various cancers. However, in 20-30% of cases, ICIs can lead to immune-related adverse events (irAEs), which sometimes require discontinuation of treatment. Due to the increased risk of irAEs, patients with pre-existing autoimmune diseases (AI) are often advised against receiving ICIs. However, there has not been sufficient objective risk assessment for AI. In our study, we conducted logistic regression analysis to assess the risk of irAEs by analyzing 478 cases that received anti-PD-(L)1 Ab and/or anti-CTLA4 Ab at our hospital between April 3, 2017, and May 24, 2022. Among these cases, 28 (5.9%) had pre-existing AI. We selected several independent factors for analysis: gender, age, performance status (PS), cancer type, type of ICI, type of combined anti-cancer agents, best overall response, and pre-existing AI. The adjusted odds ratio (OR) of AI for irAE occurrence was 2.52 [95% CI: 1.08-5.86] (p = 0.033), and the adjusted OR of AI for ICI discontinuation due to irAE was 3.32 [1.41-7.78] (p = 0.006). Patients with pre-existing AI experienced a significantly shorter irAE-free survival time compared to those without AI (median irAE-free survival: 5.7 months [95% CI: 3.5-7.8] vs 10.4 months [95% CI: 7.9-12.9], respectively, p = 0.035). Frequently observed irAEs in full ICI cohort, such as dermatologic issues (7.5%), pneumonitis (7.1%), hepatitis (4.6%), and hypothyroidism (4.2%), were often accompanied by pre-existing AI. Furthermore, pre-existing AI flared up in 6 cases (37.5% in AI-positive irAE-positive cases). The activity of AI was not related to the occurrence of irAEs. Grade 3 or higher irAEs were observed in 6 out of 20 (30.0%) cases in AI-accompanied patients complicated with irAEs. Although having a complicated AI increases the risk of irAEs, it may not necessarily be a contraindication for ICI treatment if closely monitored. (292<300 characters).

Patterns and risk factors of immune-related adverse events in a real-world cohort with lung cancer receiving immunotherapy.

12130 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have emerged as a core pillar of lung cancer (LC) therapy, but ICIs are commonly associated with a spectrum of immune-related adverse effects (irAEs). The real-world patterns and risk factors of irAEs in LC remain uncertain. Methods: Patients with LC newly started on ICIs between 10/01/2018 and 09/30/2021 were retrospectively collected from the Tufts Medical Center cancer registry and pharmacy records. irAEs occurring within 12 months after initiation of ICIs were identified. Univariable logistic regression was used to assess the risk factors of irAEs. Those with p-value&lt;0.20 were included in multivariable logistic regression analysis (MVA), along with clinically relevant factors. Results: Of 125 LC adult patients (median age: 70 years, 68 males), 104 had non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), 123 had advanced stages, and 16 had preexisting autoimmune diseases (ADs). Six patients were treated with dual-agent ICIs. Pembrolizumab was the most often used single agent (67.2%). In total 50 irAEs occurred in 39 patients. The most common irAEs were endocrinopathies (34%), pneumonitis (20%), dermatitis (14%), and gastrointestinal toxicity (14%) with the median onset time of 148, 136, 19, and 68 days, respectively. 70% of irAEs were grade 1 or 2. 44% of irAEs were treated with immunosuppression, 38% were referred to specialist care, and 30% required hospitalizations. 56% of irAEs resolved within 12 months and 67.9 % of those were rechallenged with ICIs. In exploratory univariable analyses among all the patients, age, small cell lung cancer (SCLC), PDL1 positivity (TPS≥1%), concurrent NSAIDs use, and radiation therapy had p&lt; 0.2. In MVA, SCLC remained significantly associated with irAEs (OR=4.14, 95% CI [1.50, 12.09], p=0.007). Among NSCLC subset (N=104), age, PDL1 positivity, concurrent NSAIDs, and acetaminophen use had p&lt;0.2. Age (OR=0.94, 95% CI [0.883, 0.990], p=0.026) and PDL1 positivity (OR=3.17, 95% CI [1.12, 9.87], p=0.036) remained significant in MVA (Table). Conclusions: Our study described the real-world patterns of irAEs in LC patients. SCLC was found to be an independent risk factor of irAEs in our cohort. In NSCLC, younger age and PDL1 positivity were associated with irAEs occurrence. Future studies are required to validate these findings in larger samples. [Table: see text]

Safety and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in patients (pts) with pre-existing neurologic autoimmune diseases (NAID) and Parkinson's disease.

2653 Background: Patients with pre-existing NAID often flare with ICIs; neurological (neuro) immune related adverse events (irAEs) are often morbid or fatal, and little is known about safety of ICI in pts with NAID and other neuro conditions (e.g. Parkinson’s). Thus, we aimed to determine their safety and efficacy in these contexts. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 71 pts from 5 institutions receiving ICIs with NAIDs and Parkinson’s disease. NAIDs included multiple sclerosis (MS), myasthenia gravis (MG), inflammatory neuropathy, transverse myelitis, Lambert-Eaton, myotonic dystrophy, and multifocal motor neuropathy. We collected demographics, cancer outcomes, NAID characteristics, and safety outcomes. We used descriptive statistics to analyze treatment outcomes, NAID flares, and irAEs. Results: We collected 71 pts, 40 with NAID and 31 with Parkinson’s. 24 had melanoma, 12 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), 3 small cell lung cancer (SCLC), 6 urothelial/bladder, 4 renal cell carcinoma, and 22 other; 60 had metastatic and 11 had localized disease. Median age at ICI start was 72 years (61% male, 39% female); 8 received combination ICI and 63 received monotherapy. Of 40 pts with NAID, 30% had either NAID flares or neurologic irAEs and 33% experienced other (non-neuro) irAEs (Table). Toxicities were particularly severe in MG; 70% (n=7) had MG flare/neuro irAE, 3 of which were fatal. In addition, 31 had Parkinson’s; of these, 12.9% (n=4) had Parkinson’s flares, 3% (n=1) had neuro-irAEs, and 42% (n=13) had other irAEs. One pt died of grade 5 myocarditis/myositis following combination ICI (Table). 5 MS patients responded to therapy (23%), but none were those with NAID flare/neuro irAE. Both MG patients who had non-neuro irAEs responded to treatment. Conclusions: In this cohort of ICI treated pts with prior neuro disorders, we demonstrated that MG pts have high rates of MG flare/neuro irAEs, hospitalizations, and fatalities, but low response rates. In contrast, other NAID (particularly MS) as well as Parkinson’s appeared to have modest risks of flares/neuro irAEs. Notably, Parkinson’s pts had high rates of non-neuro irAEs and response rates. [Table: see text]

Sex influence on cancer immunotherapy efficacy and safety in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): A Canadian institution real-world experience.

e20618 Background: Males and females differ in innate and adaptive immune responses. This difference may also be reflected in their response to cancer immunotherapies. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the treatment for advanced NSCLC, however the impact of sex on treatment outcomes in these patients remains unclear. The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to evaluate sex-related differences in immunotherapy outcome in a real-world population of NSCLC patients treated with ICIs. Methods: Demographics, clinical, pathological and treatment characteristics were assessed. Treatment-related variables were analyzed to understand the differences in efficacy and safety outcomes including response rates, PFS, OS and all-cause treatment discontinuation (TD) in relation to sex. Results: 152 advanced NSCLC patients receiving first-line immunotherapy, either alone or in conjunction with chemotherapy, were included in the study cohort. Females were younger age, were more likely to be non-smokers, have non-squamous tumors and had a higher prevalence of pre-existing autoimmune diseases compared to males. Disease control (CR/PR/SD) was achieved in 65.8% of patients. Median PFS was 12.0 mo in females and 14.1 mo in males. Median OS for all patients was 15.8 mo; 16.1 and 15.7 mo in females and males respectively. No statistical differences based on gender were observed in PFS and OS (P = 0.767 and P = 0.657). In regression analysis older age and presence of liver metastases were independent poor prognostic factors. Gender was not an independent prognostic factor in PFS and OS. Notably, 44 or 28.9% patients developed symptomatic immune-related adverse events (ir-AEs) that led to TD (Table 1). ir-AE-related TD occurred at a significantly higher rate in females compared with males (Table 1; 38.2% vs 19.7%, RR = 1.90; 95% CI: 1.12 to 3.26; p = 0.018). GI toxicity, including hepatitis and colitis was predominantly observed in females, whereas pneumonitis was the most frequent ir-AE leading to TD in males. Conclusions: Despite no significant differences based on gender were observed in PFS and OS, our study showed that female patients with advanced NSCLC receiving ICIs are at a substantially greater risk of severe symptomatic ir-AEs and TD. This finding indicates that broad-based sex differences in this context could potentially exist and emphasizes the need for further investigations into the role played by gender in immunity and cancer immunotherapy treatment.[Table: see text]

Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in patients with cancer and pre-existing systemic sclerosis

ObjectiveImmune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapies have dramatically improved outcomes in multiple cancers. ICI's mechanism of action involves immune system activation to augment anti-tumor immunity. Patients with pre-existing autoimmune diseases, such as systemic sclerosis (SSc), were excluded from initial ICI clinical trials due to concern that such immune system activation could precipitate an autoimmune disease flare or new, severe immune related adverse events (irAE). In the present study, we report our experience with ICIs in patients with pre-existing SSc. MethodsPatients with SSc who received ICI therapy for cancer were identified from the Johns Hopkins Scleroderma Center Research Registry. Through chart review and prespecified definitions, we identified whether patients experienced worsening SSc activity or new irAEs. SSc disease activity worsening was pre-defined as an increase in modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS), new scleroderma renal crisis, progression of interstitial lung disease (ILD) on CT scan, increased Raynaud's phenomenon frequency or severity, new pulmonary hypertension, or myositis flare. IrAEs also included active inflammatory arthritis and dermatitis. ResultsEight patients with SSc who received ICI therapy for cancer were included. Overall, SSc symptoms remained stable during and after ICI therapy. None of the patients with long-standing sine or limited cutaneous SSc (lcSSc) had progressive skin thickening after ICI therapy. One patient, who was early in his diffuse cutaneous SSc (dcSSc) disease course, experienced worsening skin thickening and renal crisis. Three patients (38 %) experienced a total of five irAEs (grade 2: diarrhea, mucositis and dermatitis; grade 3: pneumonitis, and grade 4: nephritis). The patient with grade 4 nephritis developed scleroderma renal crisis and immune checkpoint related nephritis simultaneously. There were no deaths due to irAEs. ConclusionIn this study, ICI therapy was well tolerated in patients with longstanding, sine or lcSSc. IrAE were common but generally manageable. Patients with early, active SSc may be at greater risk from ICI therapy, but more research is needed.

Herpes Simplex Virus Encephalitis in Patients With Autoimmune Conditions or Exposure to Immunomodulatory Medications.

Among infectious etiologies of encephalitis, herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) is most common, accounting for ∼15%-40% of adult encephalitis diagnoses. We aim to investigate the association between immune status and HSV encephalitis (HSVE). Using a US Medicaid database of 75.6 million persons, we evaluated the association between HSVE and autoimmune conditions, exposure to immunosuppressive and immunomodulatory medications, and other medical comorbidities. We used the US Medicaid Analytic eXtract data between 2007 and 2010 from the 29 most populated American states. We first examined the crude incidence of HSVE in the population. We then age and sex-matched adult cases of HSVE with a sufficient enrollment period (12 months before HSVE diagnosis) to a larger control population without HSVE. In a case-control analysis, we examined the association between HSVE and exposure to both autoimmune disease and immunosuppressive/immunomodulatory medications. Analyses were conducted with conditional logistic regression progressively adjusting for sociodemographic factors, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and non-autoimmune comorbidities. Incidence of HSVE was ∼3.01 per 105 person-years among adults. A total of 951 HSVE cases and 95,100 age and sex-matched controls were compared. The HSVE population had higher rates of medical comorbidities than the control population. The association of HSVE and autoimmune conditions was strong (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 2.6; 95% CI 2.2-3.2). The association of HSVE and immunomodulating medications had an OR of 2.2 (CI 1.9-2.6), also after covariate adjustment. When both exposures were included in regression models, the associations remained robust: OR 2.3 (CI 1.9-2.7) for autoimmune disease and 2.0 (CI 1.7-2.3) for immunosuppressive and immunomodulatory medications. In a large, national population, HSVE is strongly associated with preexisting autoimmune disease and exposure to immunosuppressive and immunomodulatory medications. The role of antecedent immune-related dysregulation may have been underestimated to date.

An underrecognized association: immune checkpoint inhibitor-related aortitis, a case report with the review of the literature.

Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are considered as the novel treatment modality in certain cancers. They may soon be used widely even as the first-line option for cancer treatment due to their remarkable efficacies and impacts on survival rates, particularly in cases of advanced metastatic cancer. Of note, these agents might unveil new autoimmune diseases as well as causing flare-ups of a pre-existing autoimmune disease. Data in this field have been accumulated during recent years. Early detection and a collaborative approach are, therefore, crucial in the management of a patient who presents with any of these conditions. Herein, we report a patient with a diagnosis of metastatic renal cell cancer presented with vasculitis involvement in the aorta during nivolumab treatment. Our aim with this case is to increase the awareness of ICI-related vasculitis involvement among rheumatologists in the light of literature.

Risk of severe immune-related adverse events in cancer patients with pre-existing autoimmunity receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy.

To evaluate the frequency and severity of irAEs in patients with pre-existing autoimmunity, including irAE-related morbidity and mortality, irAE-related management and resolution, and outcome of ICI rechallenge, to better understand the treatment options for this vulnerable patient population. We designed a retrospective, single-center, case-control study at a large, academic medical center to evaluate the incidence and severity of irAEs in patients with pre-existing autoimmunity compared to controls. Controls were matched 2:1 for age, sex, cancer histology, and ICI class. Patients were identified with ICD 9 and 10 codes followed by manual chart extraction. Cases were defined as patients with pre-existing, systemic autoimmunity. The primary outcome was severe irAE (Grade 3 or higher by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events) within 6 months of ICI therapy. Secondary outcomes included response to ICIs, resolution of the irAE, ICI rechallenge success, and survival. Statistical analyses were performed by Chi-square, Fishers exact, Mann-Whitney, and Log-rank tests. Of 3,130 patients treated with ICIs from 2015-2021, 28 cases with pre-existing autoimmune disease were identified and were matched with 56 controls. Pre-existing autoimmune conditions included antiphospholipid syndrome, inflammatory polyarthritis, juvenile rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis, psoriatic arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, and type I diabetes. Multiple cancer histologies, including genitourinary, gynecologic, head & neck, hepatobiliary, lung, melanoma, and pancreatic, were represented. Six of 28 cases (21.4%) experienced severe irAEs compared to 9/56 (16.1%) controls; the odds of developing a severe irAE were not significantly different (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.083-2.33, p = 0.627, ns). Moreover, there were no significant differences in overall survival or tumor response between the two groups. The majority of irAEs resolved without long-term sequelae (66.7% of cases, 55.6% of controls). The majority of patients who were rechallenged with ICIs were successful in continuing therapy (66.7% of cases, 100% of controls). Our study suggests that patients with pre-existing autoimmune disease can be treated with ICI cancer therapies and experience rates of severe irAEs and overall survival that are similar to those of the general population. These data can aid oncologists in discussing risks and benefits of ICIs when treating patients with pre-existing autoimmunity and solid tumors.

HLA inherence as a potential parameter in checkpoint inhibitor-associated autoimmune adverse event assessment.

The success of immunotherapy has made it a lifesaving treatment, but not without side effects. Currently, the risk factors for developing immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in patients who receive immunotherapy are poorly understood, and there is no risk-stratifying mechanism for potentially fatal irAEs. It is postulated that oncology patients with preexisting autoimmune diseases are likely to have flares on immunotherapy. However, some patients develop de novo autoimmune conditions on immunotherapy without a prior history. Literature reports have postulated that human leukocyte antigen (HLA) inherence may play a role in irAEs. However, this potential remains underexplored. The oncology patients who developed autoimmune adverse events on immunotherapy for whom the continuation of treatment was prudent or lifesaving were selected. Of note, all nine patients received checkpoint inhibitors (CIs). Of the nine selected patients, only one had a prior history of an autoimmune condition. None of the nine selected patients had an active autoimmune condition at the time of CI initiation. Their HLA was typed, and the results were cross-referenced with the literature reports in PubMed and Google search with the corresponding autoimmune condition of each patient. Herein, we report nine patients with irAEs for whom retrospective HLA typing revealed the inherence of multiple related HLA alleles that may correspond to the autoimmune condition that they had developed on immunotherapy. It is to be mentioned that the inherence of enriched disease-related HLA alleles was shared among patients with the same irAEs. These patients developed a range of irAEs including bullous pemphigoid, pemphigus foliaceus/vulgaris, thyroiditis, vitiligo, and hepatitis on immunotherapy. Although some combinations of disease-related HLA were well reported in otherwise idiopathic autoimmune diseases, a frequently repeated HLA allele combination in our patient population was found to be rarely seen in the general population. The authors suggest that an enriched inherence of disease-related HLA alleles may play a role in the genetic propensity for the development of irAEs in oncology patients, who receive immunotherapy, including CIs. Inherence of more than one or a cluster of particular autoimmune disease-related HLA alleles in patients who receive immunotherapy may unmask the corresponding autoimmune disease as the genotype inherence presents with the phenotype of the corresponding condition. It is suggested that enriched linked HLA genotypes, which are otherwise rare in the general population, may present as the corresponding phenotype of the autoimmune condition. Such clinical presentation, enhanced by immunotherapy, such as CIs, can play a role in risk stratifying patients for precision medicine and improve the outcome.