Predictor Of Long-term Functional Outcome Research Articles

The Pattern of Leptomeningeal Collaterals on CT Angiography Is a Strong Predictor of Long-Term Functional Outcome in Stroke Patients With Large Vessel Intracranial Occlusion

The role of noninvasive methods in the evaluation of collateral circulation has yet to be defined. We hypothesized that a favorable pattern of leptomeningeal collaterals, as identified by CT angiography, correlates with improved outcomes. Data from a prospective cohort study at 2 university-based hospitals where CT angiography was systematically performed in the acute phase of ischemic stroke were analyzed. Patients with complete occlusion of the intracranial internal carotid artery and/or the middle cerebral artery (M1 or M2 segments) were selected. The leptomeningeal collateral pattern was graded as a 3-category ordinal variable (less, equal, or greater than the unaffected contralateral hemisphere). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to define the independent predictors of good outcome at 6 months (modified Rankin Scale score ≤2). One hundred ninety-six patients were selected. The mean age was 69±17 years and the median National Institute of Health Stroke Scale score was 13 (interquartile range, 6 to 17). In the univariate analysis, age, baseline National Institute of Health Stroke Scale score, prestroke modified Rankin Scale score, Alberta Stroke Programme Early CT score, admission blood glucose, history of hypertension, coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, atrial fibrillation, site of occlusion, and collateral pattern were predictors of outcome. In the multivariate analysis, age (OR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.93 to 0.98; P=0.001), baseline National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (OR, 0.75; 0.69 to 0.83; P<0.001), prestroke modified Rankin Scale score (OR, 0.41; 0.22 to 0.76; P=0.01), intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (OR, 4.92; 1.83 to 13.25; P=0.01), diabetes (OR, 0.31; 0.01 to 0.98; P=0.046), and leptomeningeal collaterals (OR, 1.93; 1.06 to 3.34; P=0.03) were identified as independent predictors of good outcome. Consistent with angiographic studies, leptomeningeal collaterals on CT angiography are also a reliable marker of good outcome in ischemic stroke.

Clinical and neurocognitive predictors of functional outcome in bipolar euthymic patients: A long-term, follow-up study

Objective To identify clinical and neurocognitive predictors of long-term functional outcome in patients with bipolar disorder Methods A total of 32 subjects who met criteria for bipolar I or II disorder were recruited from the Barcelona Bipolar Disorder Program and were assessed clinically and neuropsychologically at baseline. After an average 4-year follow-up, they were interviewed with the Functioning Assessment Short Test (FAST) to assess functional outcome. Multivariate analyses were applied to identify clinical and neurocognitive predictors of functional outcome. Results The main regression model for predictors of overall psychosocial functioning identified subclinical depressive symptoms ( ß = 0.516, t = 3.51, p = 0.002), and free delayed recall in a verbal memory task ( ß = − 0.314, t = − 2.144, p = 0.041), accounting for 36% of the variance. Specific predictors of occupational functioning were, again, subthreshold depression ( ß = 0.435, t = 2.8, p = 0.009) and a measure of executive function, digits backwards ( ß = − 0.347, t = − 2.23, p = 0.034). This model explained around 28% of the variance (corrected R 2 = 0.28; F = 6.38, gl = 2, p = 0.004). Conclusions Subdepressive symptomatology together with neurocognitive impairments related to verbal memory and executive functions are predictor variables of long-term functional outcome in bipolar disorder.

Good performance status of long-term disease-free survivors of intracranial gliomas

Purpose : To determine the long-term impact on function of treatment for primary cerebral gliomas, Karnofsky Performance Status, employment history, and memory function were used to evaluate the status of adults who are alive and disease-free more than 1 year after cranial irradiation. Methods and Materials : Of 30 eligible adult patients, seventeen patients had anaplastic astrocytoma, seven had a glioblastoma, four had low grade astrocytoma, one had a mixed glioma, and one had an anaplastic oligodendroglioma. Sixteen patients received partial brain irradiation only, 12 had whole brain irradiation with a partial brain boost, and two had whole brain irradiation only. The total dose ranged from 54–66 Gy, with a fraction size of 1.7–2.0 Gy. Median follow-up was 3.5 years. Eighty-three percent of patients also received adjuvant chemotherapy. Results : Karnofsky Performance Status generally remained stable after the completion of irradiation. Mean Performance status was 84 at the end of irradiation and was unchanged at the time of last follow-up. The actuarial freedom from performance status decline after irradiation was 93% at 5 years. The performance status increased in two patients, both within several months of completing irradiation. Most patients (68%) returned to work after irradiation. Sixty-two percent remained at work 1 year later, and 58% were working at the time of last follow-up. No patient who did not return to work within 4 months of completing irradiation was able to work at a later date. All working patients were employed in a capacity similar to their pre-morbid position. Only one patient, with an intercurrent lung cancer, eventually developed deficits that limited self care. Conclusions : Contrary to previously published reports, long-term glioma survivors maintained a relatively good performance status in the absence of recurrence and did not experience a progressive decline in neuropsychologic function after completion of cranial irradiation. A patient's functional state at the completion of irradiation is a reliable predictor of long-term functional outcome in the absence of recurrence. Although the number of patients in each subgroup is small and no significant differences could be detected, patients treated with partial brain irradiation had a higher and more stable performance status, better memory function, and superior employment history.