Predictors Of Discordance Research Articles

Predictors of discordance in estimating the presence of chronic kidney disease among patients with atrial fibrillation and impact on prescription of anticoagulants and cardiovascular outcomes

Abstract Background In patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), the prevalence, predictors and clinical implications of a potential discordance in estimating the presence/absence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) according to Cockroft-Gault (CG) and CKD-EPI formulas remain unclear. Objective To examine patients characterized by discordance in evaluation of renal function, specifically with regard to the threshold for defining the presence of CKD according to an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 60 ml/min, in a large cohort of European AF patients, and to assess the association with prescriptions of oral anticoagulants (OAC) and the risks of adverse outcomes. Methods Data related to AF patients enrolled in a large European observational prospective registry with an average follow up of 645.2 days were analysed. We evaluated renal function for assessing the presence of CKD according to CG and CKD-EPI formulas and we categorized the population in four groups: eGFR ≥ 60 ml/min according both to CG and CKD-EPI (Concordant ≥ 60); < 60 ml/min according to both formulas (Concordant <60); CG <60 ml/min and CKD-EPI ≥60 ml/min (Discordant-CKD-EPI), CG ≥ 60 ml/min and CKD-EPI <60 ml/min (Discordant-CG). Logistic regression analyses were used to assess factors associated with a Discordant assessment of CKD and its association with OAC therapy. Cox regression analysis was used to determine association between categories and the risk of adverse outcome. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). Results 8.786 patients with AF (mean age 68.70, SD 11.58 years; 40.9% female) were included in the analysis. 1360 (15.5%) of them had Discordant CKD assessment: 577 (6.6%) with Discordant-CKD-EPI and 783 (8.9%) with Discordant-CG. Increasing age, female sex and coronary artery disease (CAD) were associated with Discordant-CKD-EPI, while BMI and heart failure (HF) showed an inverse association (Figure 1). Conversely, BMI and HF were factors significantly associated with Discordant-CG. Discordant-CKD-EPI patients showed lower odds of being prescribed with OAC therapy (odds ratio [OR] 0.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.54-0.95) with no significant differences regarding the type of OAC therapy (warfarin or direct oral anticoagulants). At Cox regression analysis, patients with Discordant-CKD-EPI showed a higher risk of composite endpoint events (Figure 2) and both Discordant-CKD-EPI and Discordant-CG patients were associated with a higher risk of all-cause death. Conclusions Age, BMI, female sex and comorbidities associated with AF (CAD and HF) significantly influenced the probability of having a discordant assessment of the presence of CKD, according to estimation of renal function impairment using CG or CKD-EPI formulas, respectively. A discordant assessment of CKD influenced the probability of being prescribed with OAC and was associated with a higher risk of adverse outcomes.Figure 1Figure2

Predictors of Discordance Between Dry Eye Symptoms and Signs: Insights From the Sjögren's International Collaborative Clinical Alliance.

The diagnosis and management of dry eye disease (DED) could be complicated by the discordance between DED-related symptoms and signs. We performed a cross-sectional study to investigate the factors of and develop predictive models for the discrepancy in DED symptomatology. We used data from 3455 participants, 21 to 89 years old, from the Sjögren's International Collaborative Clinical Alliance study. We performed a multivariable stepwise linear regression model with backward elimination and Bayesian information criteria to select predictors for the discordance in DES symptomatology, which was defined as the difference between the rank score of Ocular Surface Disease Index 6 (OSDI-6) and the rank score of ocular staining score (OSS). Ten predictors, such as "vitality," "immunomodulating drugs," sensory symptoms," and "ethnicity," remained in the final models, achieving an adjusted R2 (aR2) of 0.35 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.32-0.39). Specifically, medication use explained 19% (95% CI, 0.17-0.22) of the variance in the outcome, followed by medical history (aR2 = 0.18; 95% CI, 0.15-0.21). Health-related quality of life contributed 16% to the variance in the outcome (95% CI, 0.13-0.19), and, last, demographics contributed 11% (95% CI, 0.09-0.13). Our results suggest that individuals of Asian descent and those using immunomodulating medications often present with severe ocular signs that necessitate regular ophthalmological evaluations, even in the absence of proportionate ocular symptoms. Additionally, ocular symptoms, when accompanied by abnormal sensations in other parts of the body, could indicate systemic conditions that require further investigation and medical care.

Characteristics and correlation between FFR and RFR of non-culprit lesions in acute myocardial infarction

Background: While resting-full cycle ratio (RFR) is strongly correlated with fractional flow reserve (FFR), it has been extensively examined in stable coronary artery disease. However, there is a lack of evaluation regarding non-culprit lesions in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Objectives: To investigate the clinical characteristics and to identify the correlation and discordance between FFR and RFR among AMI patients with non-culprit lesions. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in 44 AMI patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for culprit lesions and > 90% stenosis non-culprit lesions. With non-culprit stenosis from 50 - 90%, 23 patients had simultaneous measurements of both FFR and RFR, and 17 patients underwent PCI based on FFR ≤ 0.8. Results: Approximately 79.5% of patients exhibited a presence of two or more risk factors associated with coronary artery disease. In 44 culprit lesions, 40.9% of cases located in the RCA branch, while in 46 nonculprit lesions, 61.4% of cases were found in the LAD branch. The average FFR among 44 patients was 0.82 ± 0.13. There was a significant improvement in FFR after PCI (0.89 ± 0.07) compared to pre-PCI (0.70 ± 0.11) in 17 patients with p < 0.001. The mean RFR among the 23 patients was 0.84 ± 0.12. Among 12 patients with positive RFR, RFR after PCI (0.95 ± 0.04) was higher than pre-PCI (0.78 ± 0.13) with p = 0.002. Furthermore, pre-PCI RFR showed a strong positive correlation with FFR (r = 0.662, p = 0.001). The discordant rate between RFR and FFR was 26.8%. The discordant rate of FFR and RFR measurements was 26.1%. Additionally, the left anterior descending artery (LAD) was assumed as a predictor of discordance in the high FFR group (FFR > 0.80) and low RFR group (RFR ≤ 0.89). Conclusion: The low discordance rate and strong correlation between FFR and RFR suggest their complementary roles in the assessment of intermediate non-culprit lesions in patients with AMI. Key words: fractional flow reserve, resting full-cycle ratio, non-culprit lesion, correlation, acute myocardial infarction.

Adjusting RFR by Predictors of Disagreement, "The Adjusted RFR": An Alternative Methodology to Improve the Diagnostic Capacity of Coronary Indices.

Cutoff thresholds for the "resting full-cycle ratio" (RFR) oscillate in different series, suggesting that population characteristics may influence them. Likewise, predictors of discordance between the RFR and fractional flow reserve (FFR) have been documented. The RECOPA Study showed that diagnostic capacity is reduced in the RFR "grey zone", requiring the performance of FFR to rule out or confirm ischemia. To determine predictors of discordance, integrate the information they provide in a clinical-physiological index, the "Adjusted RFR", and compare its agreement with the FFR. Using data from the RECOPA Study, predictors of discordance with respect to FFR were determined in the RFR "grey zone" (0.86 to 0.92) to construct an index ("Adjusted RFR") that would weigh RFR together with predictors of discordance and evaluate its agreement with FFR. A total of 156 lesions were evaluated in 141 patients. Predictors of discordance were: chronic kidney disease, previous ischemic heart disease, lesions not involving the anterior descending artery, and acute coronary syndrome. Though limited, the "Adjusted RFR" improved the diagnostic capacity compared to the RFR in the "grey zone" (AUC-RFR = 0.651 versus AUC-"Adjusted RFR" = 0.749), also showing an improvement in all diagnostic indices when optimal cutoff thresholds were established (sensitivity: 59% to 68%; specificity: 62% to 75%; diagnostic accuracy: 60% to 71%; positive likelihood ratio: 1.51 to 2.34; negative likelihood ratio: 0.64 to 0.37). Adjusting the RFR by integrating the information provided by predictors of discordance to obtain the "Adjusted RFR" improved the diagnostic capacity in our population. Further studies are required to evaluate whether clinical-physiological indices improve the diagnostic capacity of RFR or other coronary indices.

Guideline discordant care in patients with metastatic germ cell tumors.

Despite high curability, patients with metastatic germ cell tumors (GCT) in the United States general population persistently face inferior outcomes compared with those treated in specialty referral centers. We characterized guideline discordant management in patients with metastatic GCT who experienced relapse after first-line chemotherapy and compared those who were initially treated in community practices vs. academic referral centers. Retrospective analysis of 53 patients with relapsed GCT between 2005 and 2018. First-line GCT management was assessed against the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. Guideline discordant management, predictors of discordance, and associations with outcomes were assessed. Of 53 patients with relapsed GCT, 34% received guideline discordant care in the first-line setting. Guideline discordant care was more prevalent in patients initially treated in community practices (12/30, 40%) vs. those initially treated in academic centers (3/22, 14%), though in multivariate logistic regression, this difference was not statistically significant (odds ratio: 4.07, P = 0.08). Most patients in community settings who received guideline discordant care were undertreated (10/12, 83%). There were 3 major reasons for guideline discordant care: (1) failure to resect residual masses after chemotherapy (27%, 4/15), (2) mismanagement of chemotherapy-related adverse events (27%, 4/15), and (3) under staging at diagnosis, resulting either insufficient chemotherapy regimen intensity (13%, 2/15) and/or inappropriately receiving primary surgical resection for metastatic disease (20%, 3/15). Under treatment was identified in nearly half of patients initially treated in a community setting who later developed relapsed GCT. Referral to specialized centers for a second opinion should be considered for all metastatic GCT patients in the first-line setting and all patients with post-chemotherapy residual disease. More effective methods should be developed to facilitate second opinions from expert centers in the United States.

MP065 - Urologists are optimistic surgeons: Prevalence and predictors of discordance between intraoperative stone free rate and cross-sectional imaging evaluation after vacuum-assisted mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy

MP065 - Urologists are optimistic surgeons: Prevalence and predictors of discordance between intraoperative stone free rate and cross-sectional imaging evaluation after vacuum-assisted mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy

Predictors of Discordance and Concordance in Reporting of Intimate Partner Violence: Evidence From a Large Sample of Rural Ethiopian Couples.

Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a major worldwide health challenge, and addressing this challenge requires high-quality data. This analysis uses a large-scale survey of 5033 households in rural Ethiopia in which both men and women were surveyed about past-year IPV in order to quantify the degree of discordance, including both husband only reporting and wife only reporting, for multiple forms of IPV (emotional, physical, and sexual). In addition, logistic regression is employed to analyze the effects of demographic characteristics and individual norms and behaviors on the probability of discordant reporting. The results suggest that almost half of households (44%) are characterized by discordant reporting in at least one dimension of IPV. Given the high level of discordance, 61.4% of households report any physical and/or sexual IPV using the household-level measure, compared to a rate of 41.9% from the women's data only. In addition, men who report more gender-equitable attitudes and behaviors (failing to concur with justifications for IPV, reporting higher support for gender equitable norms, and reporting a higher level of female engagement in decision-making and intrahousehold task-sharing) are more likely to be members of wife only reporting households: that is, they are less likely to report perpetration of IPV. Women who report more gender-equitable attitudes and behaviors, by contrast, are more likely to be members of husband only reporting households.

Predictors of fractional flow reserve/instantaneous wave-free ratio discordance: impact of tailored diagnostic cut-offs on clinical outcomes of deferred lesions.

Patient-related and lesion-related factors may influence instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR)/fractional flow reserve (FFR) concordance, potentially affecting the safety of revascularization deferral. Consecutive patients with at least an intermediate coronary stenosis evaluated by both iFR and FFR were retrospectively enrolled. The agreement between iFR and FFR at their diagnostic cut-offs (FFR 0.80, iFR 0.89) was assessed. Predictors of discordance were assessed using multivariate analyses. Tailored iFR cut-offs according to predictors of discordance best matching an FFR of 0.80 were identified. The impact of reclassification according to tailored iFR cut-offs on major cardiovascular events (MACE: cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction or target-lesion revascularization) among deferred lesions was investigated. Two hundred and ninety-nine intermediate coronary stenosis [FFR 0.84 (0.78-0.89), iFR 0.91 (0.87-0.95), 202 left main/left anterior descending (LM/LAD) vessels, 67.6%] of 260 patients were studied. Discordance rate was 23.4% (n = 70, 10.7% iFR-negative discordant, 12.7% iFR-positive discordant). Predictors of discordance were LM/LAD disease, multivessel disease, non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction, smoking, reduced eGFR and hypertension. Lesion reclassification with tailored iFR cut-offs based on patient-level predictors carried no prognostic value among deferred lesions. Reclassification according to lesion location, which was entirely driven by LM/LAD lesions (iFR cut-offs: 0.93 for LM/LAD, 0.89 for non-LM/LAD), identified increased MACE among lesions deferred based on a negative FFR, between patients with a positive as compared with a negative iFR (19.4 vs. 6.1%, P = 0.044), whereas the same association was not observed with the conventional 0.89 iFR cut-off (15 vs. 8.6%, P = 0.303). Tailored vessel-based iFR cut-offs carry prognostic value among FFR-negative lesions, suggesting that a one-size-fit-all iFR cut-off might be clinically unsatisfactory.

Concordance and timing in recording cancer events in primary care, hospital and mortality records for patients with and without psoriasis: A population-based cohort study.

BackgroundThe association between psoriasis and the risk of cancer has been investigated in numerous studies utilising electronic health records (EHRs), with conflicting results in the extent of the association.ObjectivesTo assess concordance and timing of cancer recording between primary care, hospital and death registration data for people with and without psoriasis.MethodsCohort studies delineated using primary care EHRs from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) GOLD and Aurum databases, with linkage to hospital episode statistics (HES), Office for National Statistics (ONS) mortality data and indices of multiple deprivation (IMD). People with psoriasis were matched to those without psoriasis by age, sex and general practice. Cancer recording between databases was investigated by proportion concordant, that being the presence of cancer record in both source and comparator datasets. Delay in recording cancer diagnoses between CPRD and HES records and predictors of discordance were also assessed.Results58,904 people with psoriasis and 350,592 comparison patients were included using CPRD GOLD; whereas 213,400 people with psoriasis and 1,268,998 comparison patients were included in CPRD Aurum. For all cancer records (excluding keratinocyte), concordance between CPRD and HES was greater than 80%. Concordance for same-site cancer records was markedly lower (<68% GOLD-linked data; <72% Aurum-linked data). Concordance of non-Hodgkin lymphoma and liver cancer recording between CPRD and HES was lower for people with psoriasis compared to those without.ConclusionsConcordance between CPRD and HES is poor when restricted to cancers of the same site, with greater discordance in people with psoriasis for some cancers of specific sites. The use of linked patient-level data is an important step in reducing misclassification of cancer outcomes in epidemiological studies using routinely collected electronic health records.

Abstract P503: Inter-Rater Reliability and Validity of Pre-Hospital Vision-Aphasia-Neglect Assessment for Triage of Patients With Suspected Large Vessel Occlusion: Analysis of Data From Three Comprehensive Stroke Centers in New Orleans (VAN NOLA Study)

Background: The Louisiana pre-hospital routing protocol for acute stroke patients is modeled after Mission Lifeline Stroke. The Vision-Aphasia-Neglect (VAN) assessment was adopted for large vessel occlusion (LVO) screening after education was provided to pre-hospital providers (EMS). We sought to establish the inter-rater reliability (IRR) of VAN between EMS and experienced stroke team members at comprehensive stroke centers (CSC) and assessed validity of EMS and CSC VAN. Methods: The EMS run reports were linked with stroke registries from three CSCs in New Orleans, Louisiana from 2/2019-7/2019. EMS-VAN was compared to that of CSCs in all patients who presented within 6 hours of last seen normal. Validity analyses were performed comparing EMS-VAN and CSC-VAN with radiologically confirmed (CTA) LVO as the gold standard. Kappa (k) and 95% confidence interval (CI) are reported as a measure of IRR. Likelihood of VAN non documentation by EMS and VAN discordance between EMS and CSC was determined as Odds Ratios (OR) and CI. Results: EMS documented VAN in 63.2% of stroke codes brought to CSCs. Advanced age (OR, CI: 1.02, 1.01 - 1.04) and pre-existing disability (OR, CI: 1.53, 1.32 - 1.76) increased the likelihood that VAN was not documented by EMS. Both EMS and CSC VAN assessments were documented for 166 patients Concordance was 66.9%; the k, CI was 0.35, 0.20 - 0.50. Discordance was more likely when EMS assessed a patient as positive than when assessed as negative, but no clinical predictor of discordance was identified. The accuracy of EMS-VAN was 60.2% for distinguishing LVO positive and negative patients; CSC-VAN was 65.5% accurate. Discussion: VAN assessment as performed by trained EMS providers had only fair correlation with experienced stroke team members. Further education is needed to increase the inter-rater reliability and accuracy of the VAN assessment in order to improve its utility in meeting the goal of routing patients with LVO to the thrombectomy centers.

Predictors of discordance between fractional flow reserve and resting full-cycle ratio in patients with coronary artery disease: Evidence from clinical practice

BackgroundFractional flow reserve (FFR) is an established method for assessing functional myocardial ischemia. Recently, the resting full-cycle ratio (RFR) has been introduced as a non-hyperemic index of functional coronary stenosis. However, the effects of clinical characteristics on discordance between RFR and FFR have not been fully evaluated. We aimed to identify clinical characteristics that influence FFR–RFR concordance. MethodsWe included 410 patients with 573 intermediate coronary lesions who underwent clinically indicated invasive coronary angiography, as well as assessments of FFR and RFR. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves were created to assess the optimal cut-off values of RFR for predicting FFR ≤0.80. ResultsRFR exhibited a strong correlation with FFR (r = 0.66, p < 0.0001). ROC analysis identified an optimal RFR cut-off value of 0.92 for categorization based on an FFR cut-off value of 0.8. The discordance of FFR >0.8 and RFR ≤0.92 (high FFR/low RFR) was observed in 112 lesions (20.9%), whereas the discordance of FFR ≤0.8 and RFR >0.92 (low FFR/high RFR) was observed in 35 lesions (6.5%). Higher rate of hemodialysis and lower hemoglobin levels were observed in the high FFR/low RFR group. Multivariate analyses identified female sex, left anterior descending artery (LAD) lesions, and hemodialysis as significant predictors of high FFR/low RFR. Conversely, body surface area and non-LAD lesions were significantly associated with low FFR/high RFR. Hemodialysis [odds ratio (OR): 2.41, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.31–4.41; p = 0.005] and LAD lesions (OR: 1.86, 95% CI: 1.25–2.79; p = 0.002) were identified as independent predictors of overall FFR–RFR discordance. ConclusionsRFR exhibited good diagnostic performance in the identification of functionally significant stenosis. However, RFR may overestimate functional severity in patients undergoing hemodialysis or in those with LAD lesions. Further prospective trials are required to demonstrate the non-inferiority of RFR to FFR.

Predictors of fractional flow reserve/instantaneous wave-free ratio discordance documented during functional coronary stenosis assessment: impact of tailored diagnostic cut-offs on long-term outcomes

Abstract Background Patient- and lesion-related factors may influence concordance between instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) and fractional flow reserve (FFR), potentially affecting safety of revascularization deferral. Methods Consecutive patients with at least an intermediate coronary stenosis evaluated by both iFR and FFR were retrospectively enrolled. Revascularization was at physician's discretion. The agreement between IFR and FFR at their diagnostic cut-offs (FFR 0.80, iFR 0.89) according to patient- and lesion-level characteristics was assessed. Multivariate analyses were carried to identify the independent predictors of discordance. Tailored iFR cut-offs according to predictors of discordance best matching an FFR of 0.80 were identified by receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves. The impact of reclassification according to tailored iFR cut-offs on major cardiovascular events (MACE: cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction or target lesion revascularization) among deferred lesions was investigated. Results 299 coronary stenosis (diameter stenosis 54±14%, FFR 0.84 [0.78–0.89], iFR 0.91 [0.87–0.95], left main/left anterior descending [LM/LAD] vessel 67.6%) of 260 patients were studied, and 46.5% were revascularized. Discordance rate was 23.4% (10.7% iFR-negative discordant, 12.7% iFR-positive discordant). Independent predictors of discordance were LM/LAD disease, multivessel disease, non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction presentation, smoking, reduced glomerular filtration rate and hypertension. Lesion reclassification with tailored iFR-cut-offs based on patient-level predictors carried no prognostic value among deferred lesions. Reclassification according to lesion location, which was entirely driven by LM/LAD lesions (iFR-cut-offs: 0.93 for LM/LAD, 0.89 for non-LM/LAD), identified increased MACE among lesions deferred based on a negative FFR, between patients with a positive as compared to a negative iFR (19.4% vs. 6.1%, p=0.044), while the same association was not observed with the conventional 0.89 iFR cut-off (15.0% vs 8.6%, p=0.303). Conclusion Tailored vessel-based iFR cut-offs carry prognostic value among FFR negative lesions, suggesting that iFR may more safely defer revascularization of LM/LAD lesions than FFR and that a single iFR cut-off might be clinically unsatisfactory. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Discordance predictor between fractional flow reserve and resting full-cycle ratio in clinical characteristics

Abstract Introduction Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is a gold standard method to evaluate functional lesion severity in daily clinical practice. Recently, the resting full-cycle ratio (RFR) which was newly developed resting indices was launched. Unlike other resting indices evaluated in diastolic phase, RFR is evaluated during entire cardiac phase. Previous studies showed discordance predictors between FFR and instantaneous wave-free ratio. However, it is previously unreported what predictor cause discordant outcome between FFR and RFR. Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical predictors of discordance between FFR and RFR. Methods A total of 156 patients with 220 lesions were prospectively enrolled in this study. RFR was evaluated before inducing hyperemia. FFR was measured after intravenous adenosine triphosphate administration (180 mcg/kg/min). According to FFR and RFR values, the patients and lesions were classified into 4 groups: Concordant negative (Group-1 [n=114]: FFR &amp;gt;0.80, RFR &amp;gt;0.89); negative FFR and positive RFR (Group-2 [n=18]: FFR &amp;gt;0.80, RFR ≤0.89); positive FFR and negative RFR (Group-3 [n=25]: FFR ≤0.80, RFR &amp;gt;0.89); Concordant positive (Group-4 [n=63]: FFR ≤0.80, RFR ≤0.89). Among them, discordance predictors with clinical characteristics between RFR and FFR were compared using by two separate logistic regression analyses. (Group-1 vs. Group-2, Group-3 vs. Group-4, respectively). Age, sex and those predictors with a p value ≤0.10 were included in a multivariate regression analysis using by forward stepwise selection to identify independent predictors of discordance. Results On multiple regression analysis, hemodialysis (HD) (OR:6.072 [1.090–33.836]), peripheral artery disease (PAD) (OR:9.053 [1.776–46.162]) and left anterior descending artery (LAD) (OR:9.264 [2.092–41.031]) were significantly associated with positive RFR among negative FFR groups (Groupe 2 discordance). Conversely, diabetes mellitus (DM) (OR:0.212 [0.062–0.721]) and Hb (OR:1.480 [1.102–1.987]) were significantly associated with negative RFR among positive FFR groups (Groupe 3 discordance) Conclusions Since the clinical characteristics with HD, PAD, LAD, DM and Hb may influence concordant with FFR during RFR evaluation, it should be considered when interpreting RFR. Distribution and independent predictors Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Abstract 34: Predictors of discordance between image-based and manual scoring of immunohistochemical stains in ovarian cancer tissue microarrays

Abstract Digital image-based scoring of immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining allows faster, more objective and potentially more reproducible quantification of area stained or cell counts compared to manual scoring. However, predictors of discrepancies between these two assessment methods are not well understood. We examined clinical and pathological characteristics associated with discordance between image-based and manual scoring using ovarian cancer tissue microarrays (TMA) across a range of IHC stains. We evaluated 2,159 TMA cores from 681 ovarian cancer cases stained by four tissue cytoplasmic stains quantified as percentage of the tumor area stained (POSTN, CXCL14, ADH1B, COL11A1) and two immune cell markers quantified by cell count of infiltrating immune cells (CD68, CD163). The TMA slides were scored manually using semi-quantitative scoring by gynecologic pathologists as well as digitally using image-based Definiens automated platform. We used generalized linear mixed models with individual patients and TMAs included as random effects and stain as fixed effect to examine predictors of discordance, defined as absolute difference of ≥1SD in z-scores between image-based and manual scoring, overall and by each stain. The multi-level model included characteristics of the TMA, core, and tumor factors as predictors. Overall, TMA construction by automated robotic system (vs manual), smaller core size or area, borderline (vs invasive tumors), and having no geographic necrosis in the tumor were significantly associated with greater discordance between image-based and manual scoring. Interestingly, all these factors, except geographic necrosis, were differentially associated with discordance across the stains (p-interaction &amp;lt;0.05). Having multiple loci of geographic necrosis was associated with less discordance (OR=0.84, 95%CI=0.72-0.97). Invasive tumors compared to borderline tumors were less likely to be discordantly scored overall (OR=0.80, 95%CI=0.65-1.00) and for tissue cytoplasmic stains (OR range: 0.42-0.73), with associations in the opposite direction for immune cell markers (OR range: 1.21-2.37). Core areas in the lowest quartile vs all other cores were associated with greater discordance (OR=1.18, 95%CI=1.05-1.32), which was more notable for the tissue cytoplasmic stains (OR range: 1.18-2.00) compared to immune cell markers (OR range: 0.83-0.86). TMAs created by robot vs by hand had 64% higher odds of discordance (95%CI=1.20-2.25), which was more apparent when blank rows and columns were included on the TMA. Overall, TMA, core, and tumor level factors were related to discordance between image-based and manual scoring. Some stain types may be more susceptible to specific pre-analytic factors suggesting that reproducibility studies of manual vs image-based scoring should be conducted on a proportion of cases in large scale projects. Citation Format: Naoko Sasamoto, Mary Townsend, Farnoosh Abbas-Aghababazadeh, Kathryn L. Terry, Joseph O. Johnson, Jonathan L. Hecht, Brooke L. Fridley, Shelley S. Tworoger. Predictors of discordance between image-based and manual scoring of immunohistochemical stains in ovarian cancer tissue microarrays [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 34.

Agreement between self-reported morbidity and pharmacy claims data for prescribed medications in an older community based population

BackgroundStudies have indicated variability around prevalence estimates of multimorbidity due to poor consensus regarding its definition and measurement. Medication-based measures of morbidity may be valuable resources in the primary-care setting where access to medical data can be limited. We compare the agreement between patient self-reported and medication-based morbidity; and examine potential patient-level predictors of discordance between these two measures of morbidity in an older (≥ 50 years) community-based population.MethodsA retrospective cohort study was performed using national pharmacy claims data linked to The Irish LongituDinal study on Ageing (TILDA). Morbidity was measured by patient self-report (TILDA) and two medication-based measures, the Rx-Risk (< 65 years) and Rx-Risk-V (≥65 years), which classify drug claims into chronic disease classes. The kappa statistic measured agreement between self-reported and medication-based morbidity at the individual patient-level. Multivariate logistic regression was used to examine patient-level characteristics associated with discordance between measures of morbidity.ResultsTwo thousand nine hundred twenty-five patients were included (< 65 years: N = 1095, 37.44%; and ≥ 65 years: N = 1830 62.56%). Hypertension and high cholesterol were the most prevalent self-reported morbidities in both age cohorts. Agreement was good or very good (κ = 0.61–0.81) for diabetes, osteoporosis and glaucoma; and moderate for high cholesterol, asthma, Parkinson’s and angina (κ = 0.44–0.56). All other conditions had fair or poor agreement. Age, gender, marital status, education, poor-delayed recall, depression and polypharmacy were significantly associated with discordance between morbidity measures.ConclusionsMost conditions achieved only moderate or fair agreement between self-reported and medication-based morbidity. In order to improve the accuracy in prevalence estimates of multimorbidity, multiple measures of multimorbidity may be necessary. Future research should update the current Rx-Risk algorithms in-line with current treatment guidelines, and re-assess the feasibility of using these indices alone, or in combination with other methods, to yield more accurate estimates of multimorbidity.

A retrospective evaluation of treatment decision making for thyroid cancer using clinical decision support in Brazil.

e19193 Background: Artificial intelligence-driven clinical decision-support systems such as Watson for Oncology (WfO) may aid cancer care in economically challenged health systems. Evidence of the applicability of such tools in resource-constrained settings is limited. The study objective was to evaluate treatment agreement between physician-prescribed therapy and WfO recommended treatment options in thyroid cancer in Brazil. An in-depth evaluation of discordant cases by a blinded expert panel of medical oncologists and cancer surgeons was performed to identify preferred therapies and predictors of discordance. Methods: Thyroid cancer patients treated at the Instituto do Câncer do Ceará, Brazil from July 2018 to June 2019, but not processed in WfO, were selected for entry into WfO in January 2020. Blinded to treatment-plan source (i.e., WfO or historical), the expert panel reviewed all WfO therapeutic options and historical physician-prescribed treatment plans for discordant cases and selected their preferred treatment options. Clinical and demographic characteristics were analyzed using logistic regression. Results: Thyroid cancer patients (n = 83) evaluated for concordance between WfO therapeutic options and historical treatments were mostly female (91%) and between the ages of 18 - 78 years (mean 47.7). Concordance between historical physician-prescribed treatment decisions and WfO was 73.5% (61/83). Demographics and clinical characteristics associated with discordance are shown in Table. For all discordant cases (n = 22), preferred treatment decisions, as determined by the expert panel, were in agreement with WfO. Conclusions: High concordance between WfO recommended treatment options and historical treatment decisions for thyroid cancer was observed at Instituto do Câncer do Ceará. For discordant cases, a blinded expert panel agreed with WfO recommended treatment options in all cases, demonstrating there may be a role for decision support in aiding individual oncologists to make best-practice and evidence-informed treatment decisions. [Table: see text]

Concordance between clinician-rated and patient reported outcome measures of depressive symptoms in treatment resistant depression

BackgroundCalls to implement measurement-based care (MBC) in psychiatry are increasing. A recent Cochrane meta-analysis concluded that there is insufficient evidence that routine application of patient reported outcomes (PROs) improves treatment outcomes for common psychiatric disorders. There is a particular paucity of this information in patients with treatment resistant depression (TRD). MethodsA TRD sample (n = 302) and a treatment-naïve sample with major depression (n = 344) were assessed for the level of agreement in depression severity between two PROs (the Beck Depression Inventory, BDI, and the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-report, QIDS-SR) and two Clinician Rated (CRs) measures (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, HDRS, and the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale, MADRS). ResultsCorrelations between CR and PRO total scores in the TRD sample ranged from 0.57 (HDRS-QIDS-SR) to 0.68 (MADRS-BDI), reflecting a moderate-to-strong relationship between assessment tools. Correlations in the treatment naïve sample were non-significantly lower for most comparisons, ranging from 0.51 (HDRS-QIDS-SR) to 0.64 (MADRS-BDI). Few predictors of discordance between CRs and PROs were identified, though chronicity of the current episode in treatment-naïve patients was associated with greater agreement. LimitationsInter-rater reliability of the clinician interviews was conducted separately within the two studies so we could not determine the reliability between the two groups of raters used in the studies. ConclusionFindings generally supported acceptably high levels of agreement between patient and clinician ratings of baseline depression severity. More work is needed to determine the extent to which PROs can improve outcomes in MBC for depression and, more specifically, TRD.

Patient–Physician Discordance in Goals of Care for Patients with Advanced Cancer

Shared decision-making at end of life (eol) requires discussions about goals of care and prioritization of length of life compared with quality of life. The purpose of the present study was to describe patient and oncologist discordance with respect to goals of care and to explore possible predictors of discordance. Patients with metastatic cancer and their oncologists completed an interview at study enrolment and every 3 months thereafter until the death of the patient or the end of the study period (15 months). All interviewees used a 100-point visual analog scale to represent their current goals of care, with quality of life (scored as 0) and survival (scored as 100) serving as anchors. Discordance was defined as an absolute difference between patient and oncologist goals of care of 40 points or more. The study enrolled 378 patients and 11 oncologists. At baseline, 24% discordance was observed, and for patients who survived, discordance was 24% at their last interview. For patients who died, discordance was 28% at the last interview before death, with discordance having been 70% at enrolment. Dissatisfaction with eol care was reported by 23% of the caregivers for patients with discordance at baseline and by 8% of the caregivers for patients who had no discordance (p = 0.049; ϕ = 0.20). The data indicate the presence of significant ongoing oncologist-patient discordance with respect to goals of care. Early use of a simple visual analog scale to assess goals of care can inform the oncologist about the patient's goals and lead to delivery of care that is aligned with patient goals.

P1777Concordance and discordance among the recommended echocardiographic parameters for the assessment of mitral regurgitation severity

Abstract Background The EACVI and ACC/AHA guidelines recommend assessing several echocardiographic parameters when evaluating mitral regurgitant severity. In a given patient, these parameters can be discordant making the assessment of mitral regurgitation challenging. Purpose To assess the degree to which echocardiographic parameters of MR severity are concordant. Methods This analysis included 131 consecutive patients with primary mitral regurgitation enrolled in a prospective multicenter study. Nine parameters were included in this analysis (PISA –derived regurgitant volume, PISA-derived EROA, vena contracta, color Doppler jet/LA area, LA volume index, LVEDVI, peak E wave, pulmonary vein systolic flow reversal, and presence of flail leaflet). Each echocardiographic parameter was determined to represent severe or nonsevere mitral regurgitation according to the guidelines. A concordance score was calculated as: (the number of concordant parameters/9) * 100 so that a higher score reflects greater concordance. Each echocardiogram was graded as having mild, moderate, or severe mitral regurgitation using the guideline recommended integrated approach. Results The mean concordance score was 74±13% for the entire cohort. There were 4 (4%) patients with complete agreement of all parameters and 32 (25%) with agreement of 5 of the 9 parameters. There was greater discordance in patients with severe MR and eccentric jets but no difference between patients with prolapse or flail leaflets (Figure 1). Clinical predictors of discordance were vena contracta and the peak E wave. Figure 1 Conclusion In this series, there was imperfect concordance between the recommended echocardiographic parameters of MR severity in patients undergoing evaluation for mitral regurgitation. The discordance was worse with more severe mitral regurgitation and there was no ideal predictor of discordance. These findings highlight the challenges facing echocardiographers when assessing the severity of mitral regurgitation and underscore the importance of using the integrated approach recommended by professional societal guidelines. Acknowledgement/Funding None

Development and Evaluation of Record Linkage Rules in a Safety-Net Health System Serving Disadvantaged Communities

Background There is a need for flexible, accurate record-linkage systems with transparent rules that work across diverse populations. Objectives We developed rules responsive to challenges in linking records for an urban safety-net health system; we calculated performance characteristics for our algorithm. Methods We evaluated encounters during January 1, 2012 through September 30, 2018. We compared our algorithm, using name (first-last), date-of-birth (DOB), and last four of social security number to our electronic health record (EHR) system's reconciliation process. We applied our algorithm to unreconciled real-time Admission-Discharge-Transfer registration data, and compared match results to reconciled identities from our enterprise data warehouse. We manually validated matches for randomly sampled discordant pairs; we calculated sensitivity/specificity. We evaluated predictors of discordance, including census tract information. Results Of 771,477 unique medical record numbers, most (95%) were concordant between systems; a substantial minority (5%) was discordant. Of 38,993 discordant pairs, most (n = 36,539; 94%) were detected by our local algorithm. The sensitivity of our algorithm was higher than the EHR process (99% vs. 81%), but with lower specificity (98.6% vs. 99.9%). Our highest-yield rules, beyond full first and last name plus complete DOB match, were first three initials of first name, transposed first-last names, and DOB offsets (+1 and +365 days). Factors associated with discordance were homelessness (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 2.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.2–2.6) and living in a census tract with high levels of poverty (aOR = 1.4; 95% CI, 1.3–1.4). Conclusion Our algorithm had superior sensitivity compared to our EHR process. Homelessness and poverty were associated with unmatched records. Improved sensitivity was attributable to several critical input-variable processing steps useful for similar difficult-to-link populations.