Abstract Background Conduction system pacing (CSP) ensures physiological ventricular activation and avoids the dyssynchrony. New tools (sheaths and leads) can better assist the implant thus increasing procedural successes. Objective Retrospective analysis of CSP implants from the last 4 years, analyzing procedural success and failures. Methods From 2019 to 2022, 820 CSP implant were performed, being 66% of the overall implants (excluding SR and DR ICDs). 89% were PMs and 11% were ICDs. 32.6% were styled-driven leads while 67.4% were lumenless. Pacing indications were standard with prevalence of AV block (53.6%); AF with slow ventricular rate 14.8%; sinus node disease 12.9%; ablate&pace 3.7%; heart failure 12.8%, re-interventions after malfunction of a previous implant 2.2%. Mean age was 78±9 years; 61.8% were males. Results From 2019 to 2022, CSP was successfully achieved in 756 cases (92.2%) considering all indications. In 64 (7.8%) cases, CSP lead implant failed (17 lumenless leads; 47 stylet driven leads) and the lead was then implanted in RV septum or coronary sinus. Reasons for failure were: 2.7% suboptimal electrical parameters (mainly high threshold); 1.1% uncorrected BBB; 0.9% intraprocedural lead dislodgement; 1.4% impossibility to penetrate the septum; 1.4% severe right atrial enlargement; 0.3% unavailable venous access. Heart failure and left ventricular dysfunction (EF<45%) were found more frequently in the failed implant subgroup. Procedural failures were more frequently associated with more than 1 sheath and more than 1 lead utilization during the procedure. Interestingly, in 12.8 % of successful procedures the sheath was changed intraprocedurally; and in the 5.4% of successful procedures the lead was changed (from lumenless to styled-driven or viceversa). No predictors of procedural failure were found in the logistic regression analysis. IInterestingly, failed implants have not decreased over the years. Conclusions conduction system pacing is feasible in daily clinical practice. Both lumenless and stylet-driven lead can be utilized. Different sheaths allow to customize the procedure based on the anatomy. During a 4-year experience, the overall procedural success rate was 92.2% while 7.8% of the procedures failed. Interestingly the failure rate has not decreased over the years, likely being related to increasingly complex cardiac conditions where CSP has been attempted.CSP implant success and failures