IntroductionThe flâneur—the prototypical urban onlooker who silently, sometimes mindlessly, roams the streets for hours on end—is a figure par excellence for approaching modernity at the end of the nineteenth century. Guided by mere proximity rather than a preconceived plan, he or she is the ultimate consumer: of history, faces, objects, symbols and metaphors. In Latin America, the flâneur has emerged as a sort of cultural institution. As a result of a dramatic and decisive process of urban modernization, especially in Buenos Aires, Mexico City, Havana and Rio de Janeiro, strolling became a form of entertainment as well as a new way of ordering urban space, of processing both history and urban geography. As Julio Ramos argues in his detailed examination of Latin American modernization, strolling was not only a way to experience the city and overcome its contingency, but also to represent it. As such, it produced a vast body of urban literature, mainly in the genres of chronicles and novels (Ramos, 2001, pp. 127-128).The flâneur's attitude and rhetoric of consumption have been widely discussed as symptoms of problematic entry into the newly refined and complex modern market. Rather than contributing to this topic, however, let us consider here the flâneur's counterpart: the agoraphobic, a much less known yet in many ways more perplexing figure. In ways different from the flâneur, the agoraphobic embodies the discomforts of modernity and brings out its contradictions. Agoraphobia also dramatizes, just like strolling, the opposition between home and market. While the flâneur—the compulsive consumer of images and merchandise—reveals the need to reconstruct and consolidate the realm of collective identity, the agoraphobic removes him/herself from circulation. Offering an antidote to streets associated with movement and opportunities for commerce, domestic stillness appears as an intensely private and anti-commercial condition. When pondering the primary impulses that govern agoraphobic behaviour, a series of questions emerges: what is the exact relationship between agoraphobic self-definition and the commercial pressures of production, circulation and reproduction? How and why do the mechanisms, modes and forms of commerce—itself dependent on constant flux and circulation—immobilize the individual? And finally, how are gender definitions implicated in these processes?
Read full abstract