Sir: We thank Drs. Sapountzis and Chen for their attention to our previous article regarding partial nasal reconstruction with vascularized auricular flaps.1 In order to avoid the interposition vascular grafts, the authors harvested the retrograde flow flap from the contralateral side and used the ipsilateral temporal superficial vessels as the recipient vessels. We agree that their modification might have the benefits they described in the letter. However, in the figures they provided, the flap seems to be only a soft-tissue flap and not the composite flap with auricular cartilage we usually harvest. Since the nasal defect was not shown in those figures, we could not judge which nasal subunit was involved in this case from the shape of that flap. We are very interested to know, in the case of a full-thickness nasal defect, whether the contralateral preauricular flap could repair the three-dimensional deformity. As we wrote in the article,1 our nasal reconstruction goal is not to “fill holes” but rather to restore delicate three-dimensional structures. The helical rim, especially the helical root, offers the best match in terms of shape, texture, and color when reconstructing nasal ala. It also provides all three layers, as skin, cartilaginous framework, and lining, which are necessary for both functional and aesthetic purposes. In our practice, the majority of the defects involved nasal alae, and we found the retrograde flow flaps were optimal for ipsilateral defects with particular concerns on pedicle insetting and nasal ala shaping. In this situation, no matter which recipient vessels—the ipsilateral facial or superficial temporal vessels—were used, the interposition vascular grafts were needed. Apparently this is just opposite to Drs. Sapountzis and Chen’s method. In addition, since the superficial temporal vascular system is a versatile option for facial reconstruction,2 we would like to save one side for potential use rather than destroy both sides in one operation. In conclusion, we appreciate the opportunity to discuss the technique viewpoints raised by our article. Drs. Sapountzis and Chen’s suggestion also could be an alternative in certain cases. DISCLOSURE The authors have no financial interest to declare in relation to the content of this communication. Danru Wang, M.D. Yunliang Qian, M.D. Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Ninth People’s Hospital Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Shanghai, People’s Republic of China