Pretreated Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Research Articles

Phase 2 study of mapatumumab, a fully human agonistic monoclonal antibody which targets and activates the TRAIL receptor-1, in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Preclinical pharmacological properties of mapatumumab (agonistic human monoclonal antibody to TRAIL-R1) suggest that this antibody reduces cell viability, induces cell death in many types of cancer cell lines in vitro, inhibits or reduces tumor growth in xenograft models of solid tumors, and can induce significant tumor regression in some models. The receptor for mapatumumab, TRAIL-R1, is expressed on NSCLC cell lines. This pharmacologic profile suggests that mapatumumab may have therapeutic benefit in the treatment of NSCLC. This Phase 2 multi-center study was designed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of mapatumumab in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) previously treated with at least 1 platinum-based regimen. Each patient was to receive mapatumumab at a dose of 10mg/kg administered intravenously (IV) every 21 days in absence of disease progression. A total of 32 patients with relapsed or refractory Stage IIIB or IV or recurrent NSCLC were enrolled. Patients had received a median of 3 previous therapeutic regimens (range 1-7). Mapatumumab was well tolerated by the patients in this study with no discontinuations due to adverse events. The most common adverse events reported, regardless of relationship, were fatigue, cough, nausea, dyspnea, constipation, and vomiting. Laboratory analyses revealed no appreciable evidence of hepatic or renal toxicity among the study patients. No patients developed anti-mapatumumab antibodies. The plasma mapatumumab concentrations observed in this study were consistent with the predicted exposures, based on Phase 1 pharmacokinetic results. None of the 32 treated patients showed a response according to the RECIST criteria. Nine patients (29%) had stable disease (SD). In a group of heavily pretreated NSCLC patients, no objective single agent activity of mapatumumab was demonstrated, but the drug was safe and well tolerated. Based on this favorable safety profile, and preclinical evidence of potential synergy in combination with agents commonly used to treat NSCLC, future evaluation of mapatumumab in combination with chemotherapy is warranted.

Epidermal growth factor receptor immunohistochemistry

The ISEL (Iressa Survival Evaluation in Lung Cancer) clinical trial evaluated the efficacy of gefitinib versus placebo in pretreated nonsmall-cell lung cancer patients. Two different antibodies, scoring systems, and cutoff points of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) protein expression were compared to predict response and survival of enrolled patients. EGFR expression was assessed in tumor samples by immunohistochemistry using the Dako EGFR pharmDx kit (scoring percent of tumor cells with positive staining) and Zymed monoclonal antibody clone 31G7 (scoring staining index derived from proportion of positive cells times staining intensity). Data for EGFR expression were available for 379 patients for Dako and 357 patients for Zymed antibody (22% and 21%, respectively, of trial population). Objective response rates in gefitinib-treated EGFR-positive patients defined with various cutpoints with Dako antibody varied between 8% and 12%, and with Zymed antibody between 10% and 13%. Lower cutoff points with Dako antibody provided the best discrimination between EGFR-positive and EGFR-negative patients for survival hazard ratios comparing gefitinib to placebo, with a significant treatment/cutoff point interaction for 10% cutoff point (P = .049). A similar but less apparent trend was noted for Zymed antibody, although the discrimination between hazard ratios was not significant for any cutoff point analyzed. Assessment with the Dako PharmDx kit and percentage of cells with positive staining may provide more accurate prediction of differential effect on survival with gefitinib than assessment with Zymed antibody and staining index. Using higher cutpoints to define positivity does not improve test discrimination.

A phase II trial of combination chemotherapy with irinotecan and amrubicin in pretreated patients with non-small cell lung cancer

18111 Background: Amrubicin, a totally synthetic anthracycline, is a topoisomerase II inhibitor and highly effective for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) as a single agent with response rates of 25% to 28%. We previously conducted a phase I trial of combination chemotherapy with irinotecan and amrubicin for NSCLC and found acceptable toxicity profiles with a favorable efficacy in patients with pretreated NSCLC. The aim of this phase II trial was to further evaluate its efficacy and toxicity in this population. Methods: Primary endpoint was objective response. Patients with NSCLC previously treated with one or two chemotherapy regimens were enrolled in this trial. Irinotecan and amrubicin were both administered on days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks at doses of 100 and 40 mg/m2, respectively. Response and toxicity were assessed according to the RECIST guideline and NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0. Results: Thirty-one pretreated NSCLC patients were enrolled between 2004 and 2006. A median number of courses administered was 3 (range: 1 to 6). All patients and courses were assessable for efficacy and safety. Demographics of the patients were as follows: M/F: 21/10, Ad/others: 21/10, ECOG-PS 0/1: 12/19, and smoker/non-smoker: 21/10. Platinum-based regimens were commonly used as the prior chemotherapy. Objective response was obtained in 9 of the 31 patients with a response rate of 29.0% (95%CI: 12.1–46.0%). Grade 4 leukopenia and neutropenia were observed in 6 (19%) and 14 (45%) patients, respectively, whereas thrombocytopenia were generally mild. Grade 3 febrile neutropenia was observed in 7 patients (23%), of whom two patients further developed Grade 4 and 5 septic shock each. Other grade 3 or greater non-hematological toxicities included diarrhea, vomiting, pneumonitis, liver dysfunction in 4, 1, 1 and 2 patients, respectively. At the time of this analysis with a median follow-up time in the surviving patients of 7.5 months, median survival time and median progression-free survival time were 11.9 and 4.0 months, respectively. Conclusion: This combination seemed highly effective for pretreated NSCLC despite the moderate toxicity profiles. Development of efficient patient selection is needed to avoid the serious toxicities. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the leading cause of cancer-related death in both men and women. Despite the introduction of the newer cytotoxic agents in NSCLC treatment during the last decade the survival rates of patients have reached a plateau. New strategies are clearly needed to improve treatment outcomes. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) has a key role in cancer development and progression and has been recognised as a target of increasing importance in NSCLC. Gefitinib, erlotinib and cetuximab are EGFR-targeting agents that are being extensively evaluated in NSCLC. EGFR inhibitors demonstrate significant clinical activity in ~ 10 – 20% of pretreated NSCLC patients. Somatic mutations in the kinase domain of the receptor have been shown to be associated with enhanced sensitivity to EGFR inhibitors. However, four large Phase III randomised, placebo-controlled trials of gefitinib and erlotinib in combination with standard platinum-based first-line chemotherapy failed to show any survival benefit in patients receiving the study drugs. Possible reasons include patient selection, drug scheduling, trial design or other factors. Active research is ongoing to improve the efficacy of EGFR inhibitors as monotherapy or in combination with other treatment modalities.

Gefitinib (ZD1839, Iressa®) in non‐small‐cell lung cancer: a review of clinical trials from a daily practice perspective

Gefitinib (ZD1839) is the most widely studied targeting agent in the area of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Gefitinib is an orally active epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase (TK) inhibitor. In order to assess the role of gefitinib in the management of NSCLC patients, we systematically reviewed published clinical trials from a daily practice perspective. A systematic research was made in the international medical literature. Gefitinib demonstrated a good tolerance and an encouraging efficacy in pretreated NSCLC patients in preclinical studies. These results were then confirmed in two phase II trials (IDEAL 1 and 2) involving more than 400 patients mostly pretreated with a platinum-containing regimen and docetaxel. All these results were reinforced by those of retrospective studies on patients enrolled in a compassionate use programme. Thus, two phase III trials in chemo-naive patients were initiated (INTACT 1 and 2). Unfortunately, the use of gefitinib with standard combination chemotherapy provided no survival benefit nor response rate or progression-free survival improvement over placebo. Furthermore, we also reviewed the results of studies interested in the characterization of predictive clinical or biological markers for response to gefitinib and discussed the results obtained with other EGFR inhibitors. The efficacy of gefitinib in the first-line setting of each stage of NSCLC has to be further studied through clinical trials. Furthermore, translational studies characterizing the molecular features involved in the response to anti-EGFR-targeted therapies are needed.

Gefitinib as a last treatment option for non-small-cell lung cancer: durable disease control in a subset of patients

BackgroundWe describe 16 months’ single-institution experience with gefitinib (‘Iressa’, ZD1839) used as ‘ultimum refugium’ for pretreated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Patients and methodsToxicity, response and survival data of NSCLC patients participating in a compassionate-use program with gefitinib were reviewed. Documented disease progression and confirmation of the absence of other treatment options were requested. Oral gefitinib at a dose of 250 mg/day was given until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or death. Cox’s proportional hazards model was used to analyze relationships between factors and probability of survival. ResultsRapid disease precluded treatment in eight cases. Of 92 evaluable patients, one-third had a baseline performance status (PS) of ≥2. The main side-effects of gefitinib were grade 1–2 diarrhea and skin rash. A disease control rate of 46% (objective response rate 8.7%) and 1-year survival of 29% were documented. Histology (adenocarcinoma) and a ‘never-smoking’ history were predictive of response. Number of previous chemotherapy regimens, gender, time since diagnosis and time since last chemotherapy lacked such an association. Radiotherapy during gefitinib treatment was well tolerated and was associated with prolonged survival in a patient with multiple brain metastases. Multivariate analyses revealed a significant impact of PS on survival. A ‘never-smoking’ history, adenocarcinoma/bronchoalveolar-cell carcinoma and female gender showed a trend towards better survival outcomes. ConclusionGefitinib’s single-agent activity in a group consisting of pretreated NSCLC patients is confirmed. Side-effects of gefitinib were mild. Prolonged survival was associated with good PS and less significantly with a never-smoking history, female gender and histology. Additional studies on mechanisms of tumor control and selection of target populations for this remarkable new drug are warranted.

Biweekly docetaxel-irinotecan with filgrastim support in pretreated breast and non-small-cell lung cancer patients. A phase I study

Docetaxel (DTX) has been shown to be a very active drug in both breast cancer (BC) and non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Irinotecan (CPT-11) is also active in NSCLC, and has shown promising antitumor activity in pretreated BC. PURPOSE. To define the MTDs of these two drugs given together every other week with the use of filgrastim support in pretreated BC and NSCLC patients. Patients (aged 18-70 years, performance status < or =2) with advanced NSCLC or BC who had received at least one prior chemotherapy regimen were candidates for this phase I study. The starting DTX and CPT-11 doses were 60 mg/m(2) and 80 mg/m(2). Doses were alternately escalated at each step by 10 mg/m(2) for both drugs. Filgrastim 300 microg/day was given subcutaneously from days 4 through 7 of each cycle. From April 2000, 41 patients were included in the trial (27 BC, 14 NSCLC). All BC patients had received epirubicin plus paclitaxel (with or without cisplatin) as first-line treatment. Of the 14 NSCLC patients, 12 had received cisplatin-based first-line therapy, and 8 patients had been pretreated with paclitaxel. The dose escalation proceeded through five dose levels up to DTX and CPT-11 doses of 80 mg/m(2) and 100 mg/m(2), respectively. Overall, ten patients showed dose-limiting toxicity during the first cycle, diarrhea in seven and neutropenia in the remaining three. Considering all 218 cycles delivered, grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurred in 14 patients (34%), with only one episode of neutropenic fever, while severe diarrhea was observed in 9 patients (23%). A total of 21 objective responses were registered (four complete) for an overall response rate of 51% [95% CI 35-67]. A major response was seen in 16 of the 27 BC patients (59%) and in 5 of the 14 NSCLC patients (36%). DTX and CPT-11 can be safely given together biweekly at adequate doses, with filgrastim support. In view of the promising activity data in both groups, phase II studies testing this combination in pretreated BC and NSCLC patients are ongoing.