Preoperative Setting Research Articles

Online video versus face-to-face patient-surgeon consultation: a systematic review.

Online video consultation (OVC) is increasingly used in patient-surgeon pre-surgical and follow-up consultation but a comprehensive review assessing its benefits and downsides as compared to face-to-face (F2F) consultation is currently lacking. This systematic review evaluated the effectiveness of OVC as compared to F2F consultation. A literature search (Ovid/Medline, Embase, and Clarivate Analytics/Web of Science Core Collection) was conducted including studies comparing efficacy, patient and surgeon satisfaction, and information recall between OVC and F2F patient-surgeon consultation (inception-December 4, 2023). Out of 1021 studies, 14 studies with 13,564 patients met the eligibility criteria, consisting of seven RCTs, three prospective, and four retrospective studies. Various types of surgical consultations were evaluated, including new referrals, routine follow-ups, postoperative follow-ups, and mixed consultations (both pre- and postoperative). None of the randomized trials exclusively compared OVC with F2F consultations in the high-demand preoperative setting, or assessed patient information recall. Efficacy outcomes were reported by seven studies. Among these, three RCTs showed that OVC improved efficacy in terms of waiting time (8.2 vs. 20.7 min, P = 0.01) and total appointment time (24 vs 71 min, P = 0.001, and 21.9 vs. 154.8 min, P = 0.001). Patient satisfaction was reported by 10 studies. Regarding patient satisfaction, one "mixed design" study favoured OVC (92% vs. 63%, P = 0.04), while eight studies reported similar outcomes. This systematic review identified some benefits of OVC such as shorter waiting and total appointment times as compared to F2F patient-surgeon consultation, although the true value of OVC remains unknown due to the limited available evidence. Future pragmatic RCTs are needed, which should include the pre-surgical consultation and assess patient information recall.

Revision parotidectomy - analysis of indications for the procedure and treatment results based on 10 years of follow-up in a single center.

<b>Introduction:</b> Surgical removal of recurrent parotid gland tumours is the first-line treatment but presents an increased risk of facial nerve injury and a considerable re-recurrence failure rate.<b>Aim:</b> Identification of individuals exposed to a higher risk of re-procedure, raising awareness in the preoperative setting, and proposing an optimal follow-up.<b>Methods:</b> The retrospective review included 72 patients treated with revision surgery in a single centre. The demographics, clinicopathologic variables, and operative details were analysed.<b>Results:</b> Recurrent pleomorphic adenoma (PA) was the main reason for reoperation (66.7%), followed by new monomorphic adenoma (13.9%), resection extension (12.5%), and malignancy recurrence (6.9%). Time to revision surgery was on average 68.6 months and was the shortest for extended resection cases (average 1.9 months). The period was substantially longer in recurrent PA (90.8 months). The final facial nerve function according to the House-Brackmann scale (HBS) decreased in 37% of patients after reoperation. The number of recurrences per patient ranged from one in 61% of cases to eight in a solitary case.<b>Conclusions:</b> The rate of revision parotid surgery was 8.4%. Negative margins at the first resection were not of protective significance. Recurrent PA was the main cause of revision surgery and over one-third of this cohort had a subsequent relapse. As many as 37% of patients experienced a decrease in facial nerve function following revision surgery.

Machine learning perioperative applications in visceral surgery: a narrative review

Artificial intelligence in surgery has seen an expansive rise in research and clinical implementation in recent years, with many of the models being driven by machine learning. In the preoperative setting, machine learning models have been utilized to guide indications for surgery, appropriate timing of operations, calculation of risks and prognostication, along with improving estimations of time and resources required for surgeries. Intraoperative applications that have been demonstrated are visual annotations of the surgical field, automated classification of surgical phases and prediction of intraoperative patient decompensation. Postoperative applications have been studied the most, with most efforts put towards prediction of postoperative complications, recurrence patterns of malignancy, enhanced surgical education and assessment of surgical skill. Challenges to implementation of these models in clinical practice include the need for more quantity and quality of standardized data to improve model performance, sufficient resources and infrastructure to train and use machine learning, along with addressing ethical and patient acceptance considerations.

Evaluating neuromuscular electrical stimulation for preventing and managing intensive care unit-acquired weakness: Current evidence and future directions.

Intensive care unit-acquired weakness (ICU-AW) is a prevalent issue in critical care, leading to significant muscle atrophy and functional impairment. Aiming to address this, Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES) has been explored as a therapy. This systematic review assesses NMES's safety and effectiveness in enhancing functional capacity and mobility in pre- and post-cardiac surgery patients. NMES was generally safe and feasible, with intervention sessions varying in frequency and duration. Improvements in muscle strength and 6-minute walking test distances were observed, particularly in preoperative settings, but postoperative benefits were inconsistent. NMES showed promise in preventing muscle loss and improving strength, although its impact on overall functional capacity remained uncertain. Challenges such as short ICU stays and body composition affecting NMES efficacy were noted. NMES also holds potential for other conditions like cerebral palsy and stroke. Further research is needed to optimize NMES protocols and better understand its full benefits in preventing ICU-AW and improving patient outcomes.

Identifying high-risk groups for deep vein thrombosis after primary total knee arthroplasty using preoperative Caprini scores and D-dimer levels.

Caprini score and D-dimer are well-recognized markers in deep vein thrombosis (DVT) assessment. However, their utility in guiding post-arthroplasty DVT risk is hampered by susceptibility to various post-operative factors, limiting their effectiveness as reminders. Conversely, these markers exhibit greater stability in the pre-operative setting. Despite this, research on the pre-operative predictive value of Caprini score and D-dimer for DVT following primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains scarce. In a retrospective study, we analyzed data from patients who underwent primary TKA, between August 2015 and December 2022. Upon admission, Caprini scores were assessed, and comprehensive blood panels were obtained from fasting blood samples. For all patients, lower limb vascular Doppler ultrasonography was performed pre-operatively to exclude those with pre-existing DVT, and all patients underwent DVT examination again post-operatively. Our study included 2,873 patients, averaging 67.98 ± 7.54years, including 676 men and 2,197 women. In this study, 303 (10.55%) patients developed postoperative DVT, and 57 (1.98%) cases presented with lower limb symptoms. DVT incidence in patients with pre-operative Caprini scores of 1-2 (6.50%), 3 (10.28%), and ≥ 4 (18.05%) showed significant differences (P < 0.05). DVT rates were 14.80% in patients with pre-operative D-dimer levels of ≥ 1mg/L, higher than the 8.98% in those with levels of < 0.5mg/L, and 10.61% in those with levels 0.5-1mg/L (P < 0.05). In patients with Caprini scores of 1-2 and D-dimer levels ≤ 0.5mg/L, the occurrence rate of postoperative DVT was only 5.84%. For patients with Caprini scores ≥ 4 and D-dimer levels ≥ 1.0mg/L, the postoperative DVT occurrence rate soared to 24.81%, with the OR(odds ratio) was 4.744 compared to the former group. Patients with preoperative higher Caprini scores and D-dimer are more likely to develop DVT after TKA. Additionally, those with a preoperative Caprini score ≥ 4 and D-dimer level ≥ 1.0mg/L have a significantly increased risk (24.81%) of developing DVT, identifying them as a high-risk group for DVT following TKA. These findings hold significant value for DVT risk stratification in primary TKA patients and the formulation of preoperative interventions to mitigate the risk of DVT.

Comparison of a Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation Method and the Banff Patella Instability Instrument 2.0 for Patients With Patellofemoral Instability.

The concept of Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) has been introduced for several clinical entities; however, a validated SANE focusing on patients with patellofemoral instability has not been described. The purpose of this study was to investigate the expressiveness of SANE questions (SQs) for the assessment of patients experiencing patellofemoral instability. It was hypothesized that the complexity of patellofemoral instability cannot be demonstrated by a single question. Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2. Between October 2022 and March 2023, 120 consecutive patients (male/female, 50/70; mean age, 23.9 ± 8.0 years; mean body mass index, 25.3 ± 5.1 kg/m2) with patellofemoral instability were assessed with the Banff Patella Instability Instrument 2.0 (BPII 2.0). Patients were randomized into 3 groups (40 patients each) and asked to answer 1 of 3 SQs: "How do you rate your knee joint if a completely stable kneecap means 100%?" (SQ 1), "How do you rate your knee joint if complete satisfaction means 100%?" (SQ 2), and "How do you rate your knee joint if complete normal function means 100%?" (SQ 3). Means ± standard deviations were compared using 1-way analysis of variance, the correlation between BPII 2.0 and each SQ was assessed by Pearson correlation, and Bland-Altmann analysis was performed to investigate biases of each SQ in comparison with BPII 2.0. The mean BPII 2.0 score was 40.5 ± 16.8 points, and the mean results of SQ 1, SQ 2, and SQ 3 were 44.2% ± 26.0%, 42.6% ± 25.4%, and 44.2% ± 18.9%, respectively, without significant differences between the groups (all P > .05). The correlations between BPII 2.0 and SQ 1, SQ 2, and SQ 3 were high (r = 0.75; 95% CI, 0.58 to 0.86; P < .0001), low (r = 0.35; 95% CI, -0.05 to 0.6; P = .02), and low (r = 0.31; 95% CI, -0.002 to 0.56; P = .051), respectively. Bland-Altman analysis between BPII 2.0 and SQ 1, SQ 2, and SQ 3 revealed biases of -0.12 (SD, 17.1), -1.45 (SD, 24.4), and -8.0 (SD, 19.4), respectively. The SQ "How do you rate your knee joint if a completely stable kneecap means 100%?" demonstrated concurrent validity with the BPII 2.0 and may serve as a helpful tool to quickly assess patients with recurrent patellofemoral instability in a preoperative setting.

EP.07G.08 Predicting Lung Cancer Recurrence in the Pre-Operative Setting Using AI/radiomics: A Study Based on US and European Cohorts

EP.07G.08 Predicting Lung Cancer Recurrence in the Pre-Operative Setting Using AI/radiomics: A Study Based on US and European Cohorts

Does performing cardiac surgery after hours impact postoperative outcomes? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

There has been concern regarding the safety of cardiac surgical intervention during off-hours. Sleep deprivation, resource limitations, and an increased case urgency have been postulated to increase off-hours surgical risk, although outcomes are inconsistent in the existing literature. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we review the literature comparing patients undergoing cardiac surgery during on and off-hours. PubMed and Embase were systematically searched for literature published from January 2000-September 2023, comparing outcomes of patients undergoing cardiac surgery during on and off-hours. Overall, 3540 manuscript titles and abstracts were screened and 11 articles were included. Overall aggregate analysis indicated no significant differences in rates of in-hospital mortality(OR 1.04; 95% CI, 0.41-2.63; P=0.93) and perioperative morbidity, including stroke (P=0.52), reoperation (P=0.92), major bleeding (P=0.10), and renal complications (P=0.55). Composite rates of sternal wound infection favored on-hours surgery (P=0.01). Although inferior outcomes in patients undergoing cardiac surgery during off-hours have been noted, aggregate analysis largely revealed equivalent perioperative morbidity and mortality during on and off-hours surgery, although with the exclusion of one outlier study in-hospital mortality and reoperation favored on-hours surgery. Heterogeneity in outcomes is likely multifactorial, with surgical staff fatigue, patient preoperative risk, clinical setting, and resource limitations all contributing. Further investigation is required directly comparing emergent cardiac surgical intervention during on-hours and off-hours controlling for baseline surgical risk to elucidate the true impact of timing of surgery on postoperative outcomes.

Preoperative risk-stratified analysis: External versus internal pancreatic stents in pancreatoduodenectomy

BackgroundSeveral risk-stratified studies have compared the outcomes of external and internal pancreatic stents in pancreatoduodenectomy (PD), but no resolute standard for a fistula-mitigation strategy exists. The study investigated the efficacy of these stents in a preoperative risk-stratified setting. MethodsData from 285 patients who underwent PD with pancreaticojejunostomy using an external or internal stent from 2015 to 2023 were analyzed. The preoperative pancreatic fistula score (preFRS) was used to classify patients into low-risk (preFRS: 0–5) and high-risk (preFRS: 6–8) groups. ResultsPreFRS accurately predicted the risk of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) as 0% and >40% in patients with preFRS ≤1 and ≥7, respectively. Although no significant difference was observed in postoperative outcomes in low-risk patients, the external stent significantly reduced CR-POPF (21% vs 44%, P = .024) and postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH, 0% vs 19%, P = .02) in high-risk patients, leading to the superiority of the external stent in the entire cohort in terms of CR-POPF (12% vs 24%, P = .033) and PPH (1% vs 11%, P = .013). There were no significant differences in stent-related complications or pancreatic dysfunction. External stent malfunction occurred in 14% and significantly affected CR-POPF development in both low- (20% vs 0%, P < .01) and high-risk groups (60% vs 14%, P = .021). ConclusionThe external pancreatic stent showed a more beneficial effect on CR-POPF and PPH, especially in high-risk patients, without increasing other complications. Risk-stratified strategy and improving stent management might enhance postoperative outcomes.

Combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors and radiotherapy in locally advanced esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma: A review

AbstractEsophagogastric adenocarcinoma (EGJ‐AC) poses a significant global health burden, characterized by high incidence rates and poor prognosis. Despite advancements in treatment modalities, including surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy (RT), locally advanced EGJ‐AC management remains challenging. Various preclinical and clinical studies have provided insights into the synergistic effects of combining immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with RT, further supporting the combination therapy in EGJ‐AC. Immunotherapy, particularly ICIs, has emerged as a promising therapeutic approach in various malignancies, including EGJ‐AC. This narrative review aims to critically examine the rationale behind combining ICIs with standard treatment modalities, including RT or chemoradiotherapy, in the preoperative setting for locally advanced EGJ‐AC. A comprehensive literature search identified eight phase 2 randomized clinical trials evaluating the safety profile and oncologic outcomes of adding ICI agents to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in this population. The results of enrolled trials show that the combination of ICIs with standard treatment modalities is a promising approach for improving survival and pathological response in patients with locally advanced EGJ‐AC. This combination treatment was associated with mostly grade 1–2 immune‐related toxicities, indicating its safety and tolerability. There were higher rates of complete or major pathologic responses compared to historical controls. Further studies, including large‐scale randomized controlled trials, are needed to address remaining questions regarding the efficacy, safety, and long‐term outcomes of combination therapy in this population.

Preoperative prognostic stratification and prediction of long-term outcomes after pancreatoduodenectomy for distal cholangiocarcinoma

BackgroundPatients with distal cholangiocarcinoma (DCC) frequently receive adjuvant chemotherapy in preoperative and postoperative settings, but prediction of prognostic risk at the time of treatment selection remains challenging. MethodsThis single-center retrospective study enrolled DCC patients who underwent initial pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) between 2009 and 2022. Preoperative clinical parameters were collected, and Cox regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for overall survival (OS). ResultsAmong 170 patients examined, the median tumor depth was 10 mm, and 37 % of the patients were diagnosed with pT3. Overall, 46 % of patients had lymph node metastasis. The median and 5-year OS was 58.2 months and 50 %, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed tumor size on computed tomography (CT) ≥15 mm and main pancreatic duct (MPD) dilatation (≥3 mm) as independent risk factors for OS among various preoperative parameters; the prognosis was stratified based on these two parameters. Patients with one risk factor had similar outcomes (5-year OS: 39 %) to pStage IIB DCC (pT2N1 or pT3), while those with two risk factors had a prognosis akin to pStage IIIA (pN2), with a high early recurrence rate of 64 % (5-year OS: 8 %). Among non-risk group patients with low carbohydrate antigen (CA)19-9 levels (<37 U/mL), the prognosis was comparable (5-year OS: 72 %) to those with pStage I DCC. ConclusionA simple stratification approach was developed to predict long-term postoperative outcomes. To improve poor prognosis, intensive therapy, including neoadjuvant chemotherapy, should be considered for patients with two risk factors.

Postoperative Intravenous Iron Infusion in Anemic Colorectal Cancer Patients: An Observational Study.

Anemia is the most common extraintestinal symptom of colorectal cancer, with a prevalence of 30-75%. While the preoperative anemia in this patient population has been well studied and its correction 4-6 weeks prior to surgery is recommended when feasible, there is a paucity of data regarding the management of postoperative anemia, which has a prevalence of up to 87% in these patients. To address this issue, we conducted an observational cohort study of surgically treated postoperative anemic patients with colorectal cancer. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of intravenous ferric carboxymaltose on the correction of postoperative anemia by postoperative day 30 (POD30). The primary outcome was the change in hemoglobin on POD30, while the secondary outcomes were the change in iron and other laboratory parameters, postoperative complications and transfusions. The results demonstrated that patients treated with intravenous iron exhibited a significant increase in hemoglobin levels by POD30, along with a concomitant increase in hematocrit, ferritin, and transferrin saturation levels, compared to the control group. The findings imply that patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery with anemia that was not corrected in the preoperative setting may benefit from early postoperative intravenous iron infusion.

The comprehensive value of the modern vascular surgeon to the orthopedic surgery service

ObjectiveOrthopedic surgery is among the highest compensated specialties in modern practice. Vascular surgeons are consulted frequently during orthopedic operations, however, the comprehensive value of the vascular surgery service to the safe delivery of orthopedic care has not been characterized previously. MethodsElectronic medical records were retrospectively queried for all operations performed by orthopedic surgeons requiring operative vascular surgical consultation from June 2013 to December 2023. Data were collected on case-specific details, reasons for consultation, and total charges. Work relative value units were calculated for each primary orthopedic procedure using the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services physician fee schedule. ResultsA total of 952 operative vascular surgery consultations were required over the study period. Consults were requested by 56 orthopedic surgeons across all eight orthopedic subspecialties at our institution. Operative vascular consultation was requested across 108 different procedure types. A total of 94 consults (9.9%) were emergent, intraoperative requests, with the remaining 858 consults (90.1%) occurring in the preoperative setting. The most common causes for consultation included surgical exposure (n = 832 [87.4%]), inadvertent bleeding (n = 44 [4.6%]), need for bypass (n = 12 [1.3%]), and acute limb ischemia (n = 11 [1.2%]). Total charges for all operative consultations exceeded $91.5 million, and the calculated total work relative value units for all primary orthopedic procedures was 19,384.5. A total of 54 cases (5.7%) occurred after hours, on a weekend, or both. ConclusionsVascular surgeons are integral to the provision of orthopedic surgical services, inclusive of all orthopedic subspecialties, for both the prevention and treatment of iatrogenic vascular injury. The around-the-clock availability of a vascular surgeon enables the orthopedic surgery department to generate significant revenue for the hospital system. These findings are important to the ongoing discussions regarding the value and compensation of the modern vascular surgeon.

Clinical value of MR defecography: What additional knowledge is provided by the radiologist to the surgeon?

PurposeTo evaluate the clinical value of MR defecography in supporting surgical decision-making and management strategies in a consecutive series of patients. Material and methodsA consecutive series of patients with clinical suspicion of pelvic disorders who underwent MR defecography at a single university hospital from January 2021 to June 2024 were included. MR defecography was performed at rest (axial/sagittal and coronal T2-weighted sequences), during squeezing, straining, and evacuation (dynamic sagittal T2-weighted sequences). An expert surgeon assessed his satisfaction about the diagnostic information given by the prospective radiological report as: 1: insufficient, 2: sufficient, 3: good, 4: excellent. For patients who underwent surgery, the same surgeon assessed the usefulness of the MR defecography, using a score from 1 to 4 (1: discordant findings, useless exam; 2: concordant findings without new information; 3: concordant findings, useful new information; 4: concordant findings, extremely useful new information). ResultsA total of 218 patients (age 27 − 79, mean 60 ± 11; 193 females and 25 males) entered the analysis. For 211 of them (97 %), the radiologist was able to evaluate the images and determine an MR defecography-based diagnosis; in 7 patients (3 %), a diagnosis was not provided due to exam interruption for low patient’s compliance. In 195/211 patients (92 %), the radiological diagnosis matched the clinical suspect that prompted the examination. The satisfaction about the diagnostic information given by the radiological report of the 211 exams was assessed by the surgeon as follows: excellent (n = 99, 47 %), good (n = 48, 23 %), sufficient (n = 35, 16 %), and insufficient (n = 29, 14 %). Out of 211 patients, 73 (34.6 %) underwent surgery. MR defecography provided concordant findings with relevant additional information in 63 (86.3 %), concordant findings with additional information in 3 (4.1 %), concordant findings without additional information in 4 (5.5 %), and discordant findings in 3 (4.1 %). ConclusionsThe diagnostic information prospectively provided by MR defecography resulted to be good or excellent in 70 % of the patients, adding clinical value in the preoperative surgical setting in 86 % of those patients who underwent surgery.

Applying Translaryngeal Ultrasonography in Unilateral Vocal Cord Paralysis before Thyroid Cancer Reoperation: A Single Center Study

Background: One of the most dangerous complications of thyroid surgery is recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) paralysis. The gold standard method to assess this damage is Videolaryngoscopy. However, we aimed to modify this approach by using Translaryngeal Ultrasonography (TLUS). We performed TLUS with a highly trained thyroid sonographer and an endocrine surgeon in 47 patients with recurrent thyroid cancer and unilateral RLN paralysis preoperatively, and compared the results with Videolaryngoscopy. The experienced sonographer identified 45 injuries in 47 patients, and the endocrine surgeon found 39 vocal cord injuries. It appears that TLUS, when performed by experienced practitioners, is a more accurate and safe modality for assessing vocal cord function in the preoperative setting of thyroid cancer reoperation.

ESR Essentials: imaging of middle ear cholesteatoma-practice recommendations by the European Society of Head and Neck Radiology.

Although non-malignant,middle ear cholesteatoma can result in significant complications due to local bone erosion and infection. The treatment of cholesteatoma is surgical, but residual disease is common and may be clinically occult, particularly when the canal wall is preserved or reconstructive techniques are employed. Imaging plays a pivotal role in the management of patients with middle ear cholesteatoma-aiding clinical diagnosis, identifying complications, planning surgery, and detecting residual disease at follow-up. Computed tomography is the primary imaging tool in the preoperative setting since it canprovide botha surgical roadmap and detect erosive complications of cholesteatoma. The ability of magnetic resonance imaging with non-echoplanar diffusion-weighted sequences to accurately detect residual disease has led to a shift in the diagnostic paradigm for post-surgical follow-up of cholesteatoma, such that routine "second-look" surgery is no longer required. The following practice recommendations are aimed athelping the radiologist choose appropriate imaging approaches and understand the key diagnostic considerations for the evaluation of pre- and post-surgical middle ear cholesteatoma. KEY POINTS: In the preoperative setting, CT is the first-line imaging modality and MRI is reserved for rare clinical scenarios (low evidence). Non-echoplanar imaging (EPI) DWI is the optimal MRI sequence for the detection of residual cholesteatoma (moderate evidence). Non-EPI DWI plays an important role in the postoperative surveillance of cholesteatoma (moderate evidence).

Impact of Previous Surgery and/or Radiation Therapy on Endoscopic Reconstruction Outcomes.

The impact of prior local therapies, including radiation and surgery, on reconstruction outcomes after endonasal surgery is currently not well known. Reconstruction nuances in the preoperative setting merit further evaluation to avoid potential postoperative complications that can hinder overall tumor management and negatively impact patient outcome. We sought to determine whether prior treatments increase risk of reconstruction-related postoperative morbidity and to evaluate the effectiveness of our current treatment paradigm for skull base reconstruction. A retrospective review of all endonasal surgeries for tumor resection between March 2000 and March 2022 was performed. Patients were grouped based on treatment history. Patient demographics, operative, and postoperative reconstruction-related morbidity data were collected, including cerebrospinal fluid leak, sinonasal morbidity, and infectious complications. Variables significantly associated with postoperative complications in the univariate analysis were included in the multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model. Complication-free survival curves were generated, and the log-rank test evaluated the relationship between complication-free survival and the different clinical, surgical, and treatment parameters. All statistical analyses were performed with SPSS 26 (IBM Corp) and Graph Pad 9.0 (GraphPad Software). A total of 418 patients were included. 291 patients had no prior treatments, 49 patients had previously received radiation, and 78 patients had prior surgeries. Of the 49 patients who had prior radiation, 27% underwent reconstruction with tunneled pericranial flaps vs 16% of treatment-naïve patients. On multivariate analysis, prior treatment was not significantly associated with reconstruction-related complications. Negative smoking history, no leak or small intraoperative leak, and use of vascularized flap in reconstruction were protective factors. In patients undergoing endonasal surgery, prior radiation and/or surgery does not appear to significantly increase the risk of immediate or delayed reconstruction complications using our current reconstructive management plan, which incorporates an upfront regional flap for high-risk cases.

Implementation and Evaluation of a Gait Training Assistant for the Use of Crutches: Usability Study.

Surgical procedures on the lower extremities often require weight-bearing on crutches as part of the rehabilitation process. Orthopedic elective procedures enable patients to learn the correct use of crutches in a controlled preoperative setting. Digital assistance systems can safely circumvent a shortage of skilled staff and any contact restrictions that may be necessary. The usability of a newly developed gait training assistant (GTA) for the use of crutches will be evaluated. An intervention group trained to use crutches by the digital trainer will be compared with a control group trained to use crutches conventionally by a physiotherapist. As part of the development and implementation of a novel GTA, 14 patients learned to walk with crutches by completing specific exercises while receiving live feedback. Their movements were detected by a depth sensor and evaluated in real time. Specific parameters (step length, synchronous movement, crutch angle, and crutch distance to the feet) were compared with a control group (n=14) trained to use crutches by physiotherapists. The intervention group was also assessed by a physiotherapist. At the end of the study, the patients completed questionnaires to evaluate the usability of the system (Brooke's System Usability Scale score) and patient satisfaction. All patients trained by the novel GTA were able to use crutches correctly. The intervention group showed significantly better values for crutch angle (mean -6.3°, SD 3.5° vs mean -12.4°, SD 4.5°; P<.001) and crutch position (mean 3.3, SD 5.1 cm vs mean -8.5, SD 4.9 cm; P=.02). Both groups reported that they felt confident in the use of crutches, were able to follow the instructions, and enjoyed the training. Even though the majority (12/14, 86%) preferred physical therapy over a purely digital approach, most participants enjoyed using the system (13/14, 93%) and were interested in trying out other digital assistants (11/14, 79%). The usability of the GTA was rated above average by the majority (9/14, 64%) of the patients. The newly designed GTA is a safe method of teaching the use of crutches and is statistically superior to training by a physiotherapist. Even if patients prefer interaction with a physiotherapist over a purely digital approach, digital devices provide a safe and motivating opportunity to learn the essential locomotor skills for rehabilitation.

An evaluation of patient experience before and after elective colectomy for diverticulitis between patients older and younger than 65 years: A pilot feasibility study in mobile health use

BackgroundMobile health (mHealth) platforms are being used to understand patient-reported experiences before and after surgery. Currently, there is limited literature describing the feasibility of using mHealth to evaluate patient experience among older adults. The objective of this study was to determine the feasibility of using mHealth to evaluate patient-reported outcomes among patients older and younger than 65 years undergoing elective colectomy for diverticulitis. MethodsA prospective pilot study was performed between June 1, 2020 and August 31, 2021, enrolling patients aged > 18 years undergoing elective colectomy for diverticulitis at a single academic center (n = 62). A Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant mHealth platform was used to deliver patient-reported quality-of-life surveys at 3 time points: preoperatively, 3 months postoperatively, and 6 months postoperatively. The primary outcome was the feasibility of using mHealth in patients older and younger than 65 years to collect outcomes using recruitment, engagement, and survey completion rates. Preliminary findings of patient experiences were evaluated for patients older and younger than 65 years as secondary outcomes. ResultsOverall, 33.9% of participants were older than 65 years with a median age of 59.8 years (IQR, 53.3–67.9). mHealth enrollment was high (100%) with survey response rates of 79% preoperatively, 64.5% at 3 months postoperatively, and 17.7% at 6 months postoperatively. Response rates were similar among patients older and younger than 65 years (P = .79 preoperatively and P = .39 at 3 months postoperatively). ConclusionUtilization of mHealth to evaluate patient-reported outcomes is feasible in the preoperative and early postoperative settings, including older adults undergoing elective surgery for diverticulitis. Future work will focus on improving long-term outcomes to better examine potential differences when considering patient-centered outcomes among older adult patients.

Preoperative three-dimensional simulation of the breast appearance after wide local excision or level one oncoplastic techniques for breast-conserving treatment does not set unrealistic expectations for aesthetic outcome: One-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial

IntroductionSimulation of aesthetic outcomes of wide local excision and level one oncoplastic breast conserving treatment (BCT) using 3-dimensional surface imaging (3D-SI) prepares women for their aesthetic outcome. It remains unknown whether women’s memory of this information at the one-year follow-up matches their perception of reality or affects the quality of life. MethodsWith ethical approval, a prospective 3-arm RCT was conducted and it included 3D-simulation, viewing post-operative 2D photographs of other women and standard care. At one-year post-surgery, the participants completed a visual analogue scale (VAS) for the question “How well do you think the information about how your breasts are likely to look after surgery reflects how they actually look today?” and the BCT BREAST-Q module. The Kruskal–Wallis test was used to examine between-group differences at a 5% significance level. ResultsFrom 2017 to 2019, 117 women completed the primary endpoint of being informed about the aesthetic outcome via verbal description, photographs or simulation. Seventy-eight (74%) of the 106 women who remained eligible attended the one-year follow-up. The standardised preoperative 3D-SI simulation did not affect the patient’s perception of the aesthetic outcome compared to standard care or viewing 2D photographs as measured using the VAS (p = 0.40) or BREAST-Q scores for satisfaction with information (p = 0.76), satisfaction with breasts (p = 0.70), and psychosocial wellbeing domains (p = 0.81). DiscussionViewing their own 3D-SI standardised simulation did not significantly affect how the participants perceived their aesthetic outcome. In addition, it did not alter the patient-reported satisfaction. These results demonstrated that simulation for wide local excision or level one oncoplastic surgery does not set unrealistic expectations of the aesthetic outcome when used in a preoperative setting. SynopsisThe use of a non-bespoke three-dimensional simulation of the aesthetic outcome for breast conserving treatment in the preoperative setting does not over-inflate expectations compared to standard care.