Preoperative Neck Disability Index Scores Research Articles

Effect of intervertebral foramen area and width on postoperative pain relief in patients with cervical spondylotic radiculopathy

ObjectiveThis study aims to investigate the relationship between preoperative cervical intervertebral foramen width and area and the persistence of postoperative pain in patients diagnosed with cervical spondylotic radiculopathy (CSR).MethodsPatients were divided into two groups, based on their pain relief at the 6-month postoperative follow-up: the pain relief group and the persistent pain group. We compared various parameters, including age, sex, body mass index (BMI), duration of symptoms, preoperative Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, Neck Disability Index (NDI) score, postoperative ratio of disc space distraction, preoperative width of the intervertebral foramen (WIVF), and area of the intervertebral foramen (AIVF) between the two groups. Binomial logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify the factors affecting pain relief.ResultsSignificant differences were observed in preoperative WIVF, AIVF, duration of symptoms, preoperative NDI scores, and the ratio of disc space distraction between the two groups (all P < 0.05). Regression models indicated that symptom duration, preoperative NDI score and ratio of disc space distraction were negatively associated with pain relief, whereas preoperative WIVF and AIVF were positively associated with pain relief.ConclusionPreoperative WIVF and AIVF may be linked to persistent postoperative pain in patients with CSR.

Factors Associated With Return to Work Following Laminoplasty for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy.

Retrospective cohort study. To identify factors predictive of returning to work within 90 days of laminoplasty for degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM). DCM is a debilitating condition resulting from spinal canal stenosis and spinal cord compression. One surgical option for cord decompression is cervical laminoplasty. Factors influencing return to work (RTW) postsurgery are unknown. This study included adult patients previously employed, undergoing primary elective laminoplasty for DCM, and with documented RTW status. Variables included demographic information, medical history, illness characteristics, and baseline patient-reported outcomes. The primary outcome of interest was RTW status at 90 days. Statistical analyses were conducted to identify predictors. Forty-six patients (67.6%) returned to work within 90 days, whereas 22 (32.3%) either RTW between 90 and 365 days (n = 3) or did not RTW within 365 days (n = 19). Significantly more patients who RTW within 90 days worked full-time (90.9% vs 64.3%, P = 0.030). Patients who RTW within 90 days had significantly lower preoperative Neck Disability Index scores (23.7 ± 17.5 vs 35.6 ± 14.3, P = 0.008) and higher preoperative modified Japanese Orthopedic Association scores (13.7 ± 2.5 vs 12.2 ± 2.7, P = 0.018) compared with those who did not RTW. No differences were found in other baseline patient-reported outcomes. Patients who RTW within 90 days had significantly lower postoperative 3-month neck pain (2.0 ± 2.1 vs 3.8 ± 2.6, P = 0.007), 3-month arm pain (1.3 ± 1.9 vs 3.6 ± 2.8, P < 0.001), 12-month neck pain (1.4 ± 1.6 vs 3.1 ± 2.4, P = 0.019) and 12-month arm pain (1.1 ± 1.8 vs 2.4 ± 2.4, P = 0.048) compared with those who did not RTW within 90 days. Higher preoperative modified Japanese Orthopedic Association scores were significantly associated with truncated time to RTW (HR: 1.14, 95% CI: 1.01-1.29, P = 0.034). Patients with better preoperative neck and arm pain and functional scores were more likely to RTW within 90 days postlaminoplasty. Preoperative functional status plays an important role in assessing RTW postlaminoplasty. This information is valuable for preoperative patient counseling.

Five-year Follow-up of a Prospective Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption Trial Evaluating a PEEK-on-Ceramic Cervical Disk Replacement.

Prospective trial comparing the investigation group to propensity-matched historic control group. To evaluate five-year results of single-level PEEK-on-ceramic cervical total disc replacement (TDR) compared with a propensity-matched anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) control group. Cervical TDR has gained acceptance as a treatment for symptomatic disk degeneration. The design and materials used in these devices continue to evolve. Data were collected in the Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption trial for the PEEK-on-ceramic Simplify Cervical Artificial Disc (n=150) with comparison to a propensity-matched ACDF control group (n=117). All patients were treated for single-level cervical disk degeneration with radiculopathy and/or myelopathy. Clinical outcome was based on composite clinical success (CCS), Neck Disability Index (NDI), visual analog scales (VAS) assessing pain, reoperations, and satisfaction. Radiographic measures included segmental range of motion (ROM), disk space height, and heterotopic ossification (HO). Evaluations were performed preoperatively and postoperatively within two and six weeks, and three, six, 12 months, and annually thereafter. At five-year follow-up, CCS was significantly greater with TDR than ACDF (91.1% vs. 74.6%; P <0.01). In the TDR group, the mean NDI score was 63.3 preoperatively, reduced significantly to 23.1 at six weeks, and remained below 20 throughout the five-year follow-up. In the ACDF group, the mean preoperative NDI score was 62.4, decreasing to 33.7 at six weeks, and ranged from 25.9 to 21.5 throughout follow-up. Mean NDI scores were significantly lower in TDR group at all postoperative points ( P <0.05). Mean TDR ROM was 7.3 o preoperatively and 10.1 o at five years. Bridging HO occurred in 9%. With TDR, there were six reoperations (4.0%) versus 11 (9.4%) with ACDF ( P >0.40). PEEK-on-ceramic TDR produced significantly improved outcomes maintained throughout five-year follow-up that were similar or superior to ACDF, supporting TDR in appropriately selected patients.

Zero-profile implant system versus novel plate systems after ACDF for comparison of sagittal balance parameters and clinical efficacy analysis

BackgroundThe zero-profile implant system (Zero-P) and conventional plates have been widely used in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) to treat cervical spondylosis. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of the application of Zero-P and new conventional plates (ZEVO, Skyline) in ACDF on the sagittal imaging parameters of cervical spondylosis patients and to analyze their clinical efficacy.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective study on 119 cervical spondylosis patients from January 2018 to December 2021, comparing outcomes between those receiving the Zero-P device (n = 63) and those receiving a novel conventional plate (n = 56, including 46 ZEVO and 10 Skyline plates) through ACDF. Cervical sagittal alignment was assessed pre- and postoperatively via lateral radiographs. The Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA), Neck Disability Index (NDI), and visual analog scale (VAS) scores were recorded at baseline, after surgery, and at the 2-year follow-up to evaluate patient recovery and intervention success.ResultsThere were significant differences in the postoperative C0-C2 Cobb angle and postoperative sagittal segmental angle (SSA) between patients in the novel conventional plate group and those in the Zero-P group (P < 0.05). Postoperatively, there were significant changes in the C2‒C7 Cobb angle, C0‒C2 Cobb angle, SSA, and average surgical disc height (ASDH) compared to the preoperative values in both patient groups (P < 0.05). Dysphagia in the immediate postoperative period was lower in the Zero-P group than in the new conventional plate group (0% in the Zero-P group, 7.14% in the novel conventional plate group, P = 0.046), and the symptoms disappeared within 2 years in both groups. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of complications of adjacent spondylolisthesis (ASD) at 2 years postoperatively (3.17% in the Zero-P group, 8.93% in the novel conventional plate group; P = 0.252). According to the subgroup analysis, there were significant differences in the postoperative C2‒C7 Cobb angle, C0‒C2 Cobb angle, T1 slope, and ASDH between the ZEVO group and the Skyline group (P < 0.05). Compared with the preoperative scores, the JOA, NDI, and VAS scores of all groups significantly improved at the 2-year follow-up (P < 0.01). According to the subgroup analysis, the immediate postoperative NDI and VAS scores of the ZEVO group were significantly better than those of the Skyline group (P < 0.05).ConclusionIn ACDF, both novel conventional plates and Zero-P can improve sagittal parameters and related scale scores. Compared to the Zero-P plate, the novel conventional plate has a greater advantage in correcting the curvature of the surgical segment, but the Zero-P plate is less likely to produce postoperative dysphagia.

Safety and efficacy of day anterior cervical discectomy and fusion procedure for degenerative cervical spondylosis: a retrospective analysis

ObjectiveOur study aimed to develop a day anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) procedure to treat degenerative cervical spondylosis (DCS). The goal was to analyze its clinical implications, safety, and early effects to provide a better surgical option for eligible DCS patients.MethodsA retrospective analysis was performed to identify DCS patients who underwent day ACDF from September 2022 to August 2023. The operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage, preoperative and postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) scores, neck disability index (NDI) scores, Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores, JOA recovery rate (RR), incidence of dysphagia-related symptoms, 30-day hospital readmission rate, and incidence of other complications were recorded to evaluate early clinical outcomes. Radiography was performed to assess the location of the implants, neurological decompression, and cervical physiological curvature.ResultsAll 33 patients (23 women and 10 men) underwent successful surgery and experienced significant symptomatic and neurological improvements. Among them, 26 patients underwent one-segment ACDF, 5 underwent two-segment ACDF, and 2 underwent three-segment ACDF. The average operative time was 71.1 ± 20.2 min, intraoperative blood loss was 19.1 ± 6.2 mL, and postoperative drainage was 9.6 ± 5.8 mL. The preoperative VAS and NDI scores improved postoperatively (7.1 ± 1.2 vs. 3.1 ± 1.3 and 66.7% ± 4.8% vs. 24.1% ± 2.5%, respectively), with a significant difference (P < 0.01). Moreover, the preoperative JOA scores improved significantly postoperatively (7.7 ± 1.3 vs. 14.2 ± 1.4; P < 0.01) with an RR of 93.9% in good or excellent. Postoperative dysphagia-related symptoms occurred in one patient (3.0%). During the follow-up period, no patient was readmitted within 30 days after discharge; however, an incisional hematoma was reported in one patient on the 6th day after discharge, which was cured by pressure dressing. The postoperative radiographs revealed perfect implant positions and sufficient nerve decompression in all patients. Furthermore, the preoperative cervical physiological curvature improved significantly after the operation (14.5° ± 4.0° vs. 26.3° ± 5.4°; P < 0.01).ConclusionsDay ACDF has good safety and early clinical efficacy, and it could be an appropriate choice for eligible DCS patients.

One-Year Follow-Up Study on Assessing the Range of Segmental Motion and Clinical Outcomes Following Cervical Disc Arthroplasty for Treatment of Severe Cervical Disc Degeneration

Though previous studies have documented various clinical outcomes after cervical arthroplasty for degenerative cervical disc disease, none of them reported the impact of cervical arthroplasty on severe cervical disc degeneration (CDD). This retrospective cohort study included severe 40 CDD (C3-C7) patients who underwent single-level cervical arthroplasty using ProDisc-C between January 2017 and December 2019. After surgical intervention, the range of motion (ROM) was determined, whereas clinical outcomes were measured in terms of the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Neck Disability Index (NDI) to evaluate neck pain and disability, respectively. Compared to the mean preoperative ROM (6.57 ± 4.85°), the cervical dynamic ROM was increased 3months after cervical arthroplasty, and the increment was maintained for at least 1year. The increased ROM is attributed to the extension and not flexion components. The mean preoperative ROM of 6.57 ± 4.85° significantly increased to 11.67 ± 4.98° (P= 0.0005), 10.05 ± 5.18° (P= 0.0426) and 10.46 ± 4.73° (P= 0.0247) after 3months, 6months and 1year, respectively. The extension ROM also revealed a similar trend. VAS for neck and arm decreased from 7.4 and 6.6 to 1.4 and 1.2, respectively. Consistently, the preoperative mean Neck Disability Index (NDI) score of 27.6 decreased to 14.6. We recorded a case of device subsidence, but without extrusion. Cervical arthroplasty can improve clinical outcomes and restore ROM in severe CDD patients.

Neck Disability Index as a Prognostic Factor for Outcomes Following Cervical Disc Replacement.

Retrospective review. We aim to elucidate the potential relationship between neck disability index (NDI) and outcomes following cervical disk replacement (CDR). The use of preoperative disability scores as predictors of outcomes following spine surgery has previously been studied, yet no literature has been published regarding its use in CDR. A retrospective database of a single orthopedic spine surgeon was searched for single-level CDR patients with preoperative NDI scores, excluding those with trauma, infection, or malignancy. Patients were separated into 2 cohorts by NDI score: Mild-Moderately Disabled (MD) (NDI<50) and Severely Disabled (NDI≥50). Patient-reported outcome measures were collected and compared within and between groups up to 1 year postoperatively and included Patient-reported Outcome Measurement Information System Physical Function, 12-Item Short Form (SF-12) Physical Component Score and Mental Component Score, visual analog scale (VAS) neck and arm pain, and NDI. MCID achievement rates were compared between the groups. All PROM scores significantly improved for both cohorts at one or more postoperative time points compared with preoperative baseline ( P ≤0.049, all), with the exception of SF-12 Mental Component Score, which only significantly improved in the MD cohort at 2 postoperative points ( P ≤0.007, both). Between groups, the MD cohort reported significantly superior scores at one or more time points for all studied patient-reported outcome measures ( P ≤0.047, all). MCID achievement rate did not significantly vary for any outcome at any time between cohorts. Regardless of preoperative disability, both groups reported improvement in physical function, pain, and disability scores following CDR. While not finding significance, patients with severe disability preoperatively consistently demonstrated higher minimal clinically important difference achievement in NDI. These data do not promote the use of NDI as a prognostic factor for outcomes following CDR. Further study with larger patient populations may be useful to clarify this potential relationship.

Posterior Preventive Foraminotomy before Laminectomy Combined with Pedicle Screw Fixation May Decrease the Incidence of C5 Palsy in Complex Cervical Spine Surgery in Patients with Severe Myeloradiculopathy.

C5 palsy is a frequent sequela of cervical decompression surgeries for cervical myeloradiculopathy. Although many researchers have suggested various risk factors, such as cord shifting and the correction of lordotic angles, the tethering of the C5 root beneath the narrow foramen is an independent risk factor for C5 palsy. In this study, we tried to investigate different techniques for foramen decompression with posterior cervical fusion and assess the incidence of C5 palsy with each technique depending on the order of foraminal decompression. A combined 540° approach with LMS and uncovertebrectomy was used in group 1. Group 2 combined a 540° approach with pedicle screws and posterior foraminotomy, while posterior approach only with pedicle screws and foraminotomy was used in group 3. For groups 2 and 3, prophylactic posterior foraminotomy was performed before laminectomy. Motor manual testing to assess C5 palsy, the Neck Disability Index (NDI) and the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores were determined before and after surgery. Simple radiographs, MRI and CT scans, were obtained to assess radiologic parameters preoperatively and postoperatively. A total of 362 patients were enrolled in this study: 208 in group 1, 72 in group 2, and 82 in group 3. The mean age was 63.2, 65.5, and 66.6 years in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The median for fused levels was 4 for the three groups. There was no significant difference between groups regarding the number of fused levels. Weight, height, comorbidities, and diagnosis were not significantly different between groups. Preoperative JOA scores were similar between groups (p = 0.256), whereas the preoperative NDI score was significantly higher in group 3 than in group 2 (p = 0.040). Mean JOA score at 12-month follow-up was 15.5 ± 1.89, 16.1 ± 1.48, and 16.1 ± 1.48 for groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively; it was higher in group 3 compared with group 1 (p = 0.008) and in group 2 compared with group 1 (p = 0.024). NDI score at 12 months was 13, 12, and 13 in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively; it was significantly better in group 3 than in group 1 (p = 0.040), but there were no other significant differences between groups. The incidence of C5 palsy was significantly lower in posterior foraminotomy groups with pedicle screws (groups 2 and 3) than in LMS with uncovertebrectomy (group 1) (p < 0.001). Thus, preventive expansive foraminotomy before decompressive laminectomy is able to significantly decrease the root tethering by stenotic lesion, and subsequently, decrease the incidence of C5 palsy associated with posterior only or combined posterior and anterior cervical fusion surgeries. Additionally, such expansive foraminotomy might be appropriate with pedicle screw insertion based on biomechanical considerations.

Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Combined with Foraminotomy Assisted by High-Definition 3-Dimensional Exoscope in the Treatment of Cervical Spondylotic Radiculopathy Secondary to Bony Foraminal Stenosis.

ObjectiveTo evaluate the outcomes of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy secondary to bony foraminal stenosis treated with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) combined with anterior cervical foraminotomy (ACF) assisted by High‐Definition 3‐Dimensional Exoscope.MethodsIn this retrospective study, a total of 19 consecutive patients (12 males and seven females, with an average of 49.2 years, range from 40 to 59 years) with spondylotic radiculopathy caused by bony foraminal stenosis underwent ACDF combined with ACF assisted by High‐Definition 3‐Dimensional Exoscope in our hospital between January 2019 and December 2019 were included in this study. All patients signed the consent form before the surgery. The patient baseline information such as gender, age, body mass index (BMI), surgery time, blood loss, hospital stay, lesion segment, side, follow‐up time and postoperative complications were recorded. The Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA), Neck Disability Index (NDI), and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) were measured and compared before surgery, 1 months and final follow‐up after surgery. The radiographic outcomes were evaluated using the C2‐C7 angel, disc height, foraminal height, superior diagonal distance, inferior diagonal distance, and foraminal area.ResultsThe involved levels included C4‐C5 (six cases), C5‐C6 (10 cases), C6‐C7 (three cases). The mean duration of the surgery, mean blood loss, mean hospital stay, and mean follow‐up were 100 ± 11.10 min, 19.4 ± 7.05 mL, 7.1 ± 0.99 days, and 12.1 ± 2.25 months, respectively. The average preoperative JOA score was 11.9 ± 1.31, then improved to 15.7 ± 0.73 (t = −13.45, P < 0.001) and 16.2 ± 0.74 (t = −14.39, P < 0.001) at 1 month after operation and at last follow‐up, respectively. The average preoperative NDI score was 27.3 ± 3.36, then decreased to 5.1 ± 1.79 (t = 20.63, P < 0.001) and 4.5 ± 1.21 (t = 25.53, P < 0.001) 1 month after operation and at last follow‐up, respectively. The average preoperative VAS score was 6.7 ± 0.93, then decreased to 2.4 ± 0.69 (t = 15.05, P < 0.001) and 1.9 ± 0.78 (t = 16.40, P < 0.001) 1 month after operation and at last follow‐up, respectively. As compared with the condition before surgery, there was a significant improvement in the C2‐C7 angel, disc height, foraminal height, and foraminal area (P < 0.05). None of the patients developed postoperative vascular injury, nerve injury, loosening and rupture of the internal fixation, displacement of interbody fusion cage, and pseudarthrosis.ConclusionACDF combined with ACF assisted by High‐Definition 3‐Dimensional Exoscope is effective and safe for the treatment of CSR caused by secondary to bony foraminal stenosis.

P112. Cervical disc replacement for radiculopathy versus myeloradiculopathy: An MCID analysis

<h3>BACKGROUND CONTEXT</h3> Several previous randomized controlled trials have documented the success of cervical disc replacement (CDR) in treating radiculopathy and/or myelopathy, but many did not systematically compare outcomes of patients with radiculopathy versus those with myelopathy. Currently, there is still controversy about whether CDR utilization in patients with components of myelopathy can result in equivalent outcomes when compared to its use in patients with only radiculopathy. <h3>PURPOSE</h3> The purpose of the present study was to compare the minimally clinically important difference (MCID) across multiple patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients undergoing CDR for cervical spondylotic radiculopathy versus myeloradiculopathy. <h3>STUDY DESIGN/SETTING</h3> Retrospective review of prospectively collected data. <h3>PATIENT SAMPLE</h3> Patients who underwent one or two-level CDR with radiculopathy versus myeloradiculopathy. <h3>OUTCOME MEASURES</h3> Neck Disability Index (NDI), VAS-Neck, VAS-Arm, Short Form-12 Health Survey (SF-12) Physical Component Score (PCS), SF-12 Mental Component Score (MCS), PROMIS Physical Function (PF). <h3>METHODS</h3> Demographic variables and operative characteristics were analyzed for differences between patients with radiculopathy versus myeloradiculopathy. PROs were assessed for differences between the two diagnosis groups as well as improvements within each group following surgery. An MCID analysis of PROs for each diagnosis group was performed and the percentage of patients achieving the MCID was compared between the two diagnosis groups. <h3>RESULTS</h3> A total of 85 patients were included in the present study, of which 48 (56%) had radiculopathy and 37 (44%) had myeloradiculopathy. Average follow-up was 13.4 months. There were no significant differences in preoperative demographic variables, or the number and distribution of cervical levels treated between the two diagnosis groups. There were no significant differences in preoperative NDI, Neck-VAS, Arm-VAS, SF-12 PCS, SF-12 MCS, and PROMIS PF scores between the two groups. At the final postoperative visit, there was no significant difference in each PRO assessed between the radiculopathy and myeloradiculopathy groups and both groups demonstrated statistically significant improvement in each PRO compared to preoperative values (P<0.02).MCID analysis demonstrated that at 6-week, 12-week, and final postoperative follow-up there was no significant difference in the percentage of patients with radiculopathy or myeloradiculopathy achieving the MCID for each PRO assessed. In both diagnosis groups the percentage of patients achieving the MCID for each PRO continued to increase from the 6-week to final postoperative follow-up except for the SF-12 MCS in patients with myeloradiculopathy. <h3>CONCLUSIONS</h3> This is the first study to compare the MCID across various PROs in patients with radiculopathy versus myelopathy undergoing CDR. The percentage of patients achieving the MCID was not significantly different at each postoperative period assessed in the radiculopathy and myeloradiculopathy groups. In addition, the percentage of patients achieving the MCID continued to increase from 6-weeks to final follow-up in both groups for almost all PROs assessed. <h3>FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS</h3> This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.

Workers' Compensation Status in Association with a High NDI Score Negatively Impacts Post-Operative Dysphagia and Dysphonia Following Anterior Cervical Fusion

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a safe and effective procedure but has approach-related complications like postoperative dysphagia and dysphonia (PDD). Patient-reported outcome measures including the Hospital for Special Surgery Dysphagia and Dysphonia Inventory (HSS-DDI) have been used for the assessment of PDD. Various factors have been described that affect ACDF outcomes, and our aim was to investigate the effect of workers' compensation (WC) status. We included patients who underwent ACDF from 2015 to 2018 stratified according to insurance status: WC/non-WC. PDDs were assessed using the HSS-DDI score. We conducted logistic regression analyses. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. We included 287 patients, 44 (15.33%) WC and 243 (84.67%) non-WC. A statistical comparison revealed a clinically relevant difference in the HSS-DDI total score and both subdomains (P= 0.015; dysphagia P= 0.021; dysphonia P= 0.002). Additional logistic regression analysis adjusting for preoperative Neck Disability Index scores resulted in no clinically relevant differences in the HSS-DDI total score and both subdomains (total score P= 0.420; dysphagia P= 0.531; dysphonia 0.315). WC status was associated with a worse HSS-DDI score but could not be shown to be an independent risk factor for PDD. The preoperative NDI score was a strong predictor for PDD with a clinically relevant difference in the HSS DDI score (P < 0.0001). Surgeon awareness of risk factors for PDD such as WC status, even if it could not be shown as independent, is important as it may influence surgical decision making and managing patient expectations.

A 10-year follow-up study of indications for artificial cervical disc replacement

Objective: To investigate the influence of the preoperative factors on the segmental range of motion (ROM) during long-term follow-up after artificial cervical disc replacement (ACDR), so as to further improve the selection of surgical indications for ACDR. Methods: Retrospective analysis was performed on 71 patients with cervical degenerative diseases who underwent single-segment Bryan ACDR in Beijing Jishuitan Hosptial from December 2003 to December 2008, and a 10-year clinical follow-up was conducted. Among the patients, 44 were males and 27 were females, with a mean age of (45±8) years at operation. The mean follow-up time was (129±14) months. Preoperative and follow-up imaging evaluation including measurement of the segmental range of motion (ROM) by cervical X-ray, and preoperative height of intervertebral space was measured by cervical lateral X-ray. According to CT and coronal reconstruction, the grade of paravertebral ossification (PO) was assessed. Clinical symptoms assessment including the Japanese Orthopaedic Association scoring (JOA), the Neck Disability Index (NDI) evaluation was performed preoperatively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the influencing factors of the range of motion of the surgical segment during follow-up. The best cut-off value was calculated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Results: The preoperative and follow-up ROM at the operated segment was 9.7°±4.5° and 8.7°±5.4°, respectively (P>0.05). Univariate analysis revealed that the postoperative segmental ROM was not significantly correlated with the factors including the surgical level, gender, age, and preoperative clinical diagnosis (1: Radiculopathy; 2: Myelopathy; 3: Mixed type), preoperative segmental ROM, preoperative JOA score and preoperative NDI score (all P>0.05), and was significantly correlated with imaging diagnosis (1: cervical disc herniation; 2: degenerative cervical stenosis), preoperative PO grade (both P<0.05). The multi-factor analysis showed that preoperative segmental ROM (OR=1.228, 95%CI:1.012-1.489, P<0.05) and PO grade (OR=0.190, 95%CI: 0.085-0.424, P<0.05) had significance in the overall test, but imaging diagnosis had no significance in the overall test (P>0.05). The optimal cutoff value of preoperative segmental ROM and PO grade was 9.185° and grade 2.5 assessed by ROC curve, and the area under the ROC curve was 0.86 and 0.72, respectively. Conclusions: ACDR surgery can achieve satisfactory long-term effects for patients with nerve root type, spinal cord type and mixed type cervical degenerative diseases, and effectively retain the overall ROM of the cervical spine and the ROM of replacement segments. Patients with good preoperative segmental ROM and lower PO levels have a greater chance of obtaining good segmental ROM in the long-term postoperatively.

Single-Stage Posterior Approach for Multilevel Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament With K-line (-) Using Thick Cervical Pedicle Screw System: A Technical Note and Preliminary Results.

Technical note, retrospective case series. The optimal surgical strategy for multilevel cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) with a negative kyphosis line (K-line (-)) remains controversial. We present a novel single-stage posterior approach that converts the K-line from negative to positive in patients with multilevel cervical OPLL, using a posterior thick cervical pedicle screw (CPS) system and report the procedure's outcomes and feasibility. Twelve consecutive patients with multilevel cervical OPLL and K-line (-) underwent single-stage posterior thick CPS fixation, with laminectomy and foraminal decompression. A pre-bent rod was installed to convert the K-line from negative to positive. Radiographic parameters, including the extent and occupying ratio of OPLL and the C2-C7 angle, were examined. CPS accuracy was assessed using computed tomography. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) and visual analog scale (VAS) scores were analyzed. Quality of life was assessed using the Neck Disability Index (NDI). The mean OPLL extent was 5 vertebral body levels, and posterior decompression was performed on 4.2 segments. The average C2-C7 angle and the occupying ratio of OPLL improved from -9.0° to 14.3° and from 63% to 33%, respectively. The preoperative JOA, VAS, and NDI scores significantly improved from 8.4 to 13.3, from 7.1 to 2.2, and from 21.9 to 9.3, respectively. The K-line was converted from negative to positive in all cases. No severe complications were identified. Single-stage posterior surgery with a thick CPS system may be a reliable and effective treatment for multilevel cervical OPLL and K-line (-).

Risk factors for postoperative dysphagia and dysphonia following anterior cervical spine surgery: a comprehensive study utilizing the hospital for special surgery dysphagia and dysphonia inventory (HSS-DDI)

BACKGROUND CONTEXTPostoperative dysphagia and dysphonia (PDD) are prevalent complications after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Identification of risk factors for these complications is necessary for effective prevention. Recently, patient reported outcome measures (PROM) have been used to determine PDD after ACDF. The Hospital for Special Surgery Dysphagia and Dysphonia Inventory (HSS-DDI) is a validated PROM that specifically assesses dysphagia and dysphonia after anterior cervical spine surgery. PURPOSETo identify the perioperative risk factors for PDD utilizing the HSS-DDI. STUDY DESIGN/SETTINGObservational study of prospectively collected data at a single academic institution. PATIENT SAMPLEPatients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion from 2015 to 2019 who enrolled in the prospective data collection. OUTCOME MEASUREThe HSS-DDI administered 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 4-6 months after surgery. METHODSAs potential risk factors, the data on demographic factors, analgesic medications, history of psychiatric illness, preoperative sagittal alignment, surgical factors, preoperative diagnoses, and preoperative Neck Disability Index (NDI) scores were collected. Bivariate and multivariable regression analyses utilizing the Tobit model were conducted. RESULTS291 patients were included in the final analysis. The median HSS-DDI at 4-weeks, 8 weeks, and 4-6 months postoperatively, were 80.7, 92.7, and 98.4, respectively. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that current smoking, previous cervical spine surgery, preoperative C2-7 angle, upper level surgery, multilevel surgery, opioid use, and a high preoperative NDI score, were independent contributing factors to a low HSS-DDI score at 4-weeks follow-up. Intraoperative topical steroid use was an independent protective factor for a low HSS-DDI score. Opioid use and high NDI score remained independent factors at 4-6 months. Sub-domain analysis demonstrated that prior cervical surgery, preoperative C2-7 angle, multilevel surgery, and intraoperative topical steroid use were significant for dysphagia only. Current smoking was significant for dysphonia only. CONCLUSIONSOur results showed that preoperative opioid use and a high preoperative NDI score are novel independent risk factors for postoperative dysphagia and dysphonia in addition to other known factors.

Improvements in Neck Pain and Disability Following C1-C2 Posterior Cervical Instrumentation and Fusion for Atlanto-Axial Osteoarthritis

Symptomatic Atlanto-axial (C1-2) osteoarthritis (AAOA) is a common phenomenon in elderly patients; however, there is a paucity of data on the effectiveness of posterior atlanto-axial fusion (PAAF) for this condition. To this end, here we assess changes in patient-reported outcomes and neck-related disability in adult patients undergoing PAAF for symptomatic C1-2 AAOA. In this retrospective study, the clinical records of consecutive patients with symptomatic AAOA who underwent PAAF between 2004 and 2017 were reviewed. Patient demographics, comorbidities, intraoperative and postoperative variables, and complication rates were collected. Neck Disability Index (NDI) scores were recorded at baseline and 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively. Forty-two patients (average age, 72.04 ± 8.56 years; 26.19% males) met the study's inclusion criteria. In this cohort, 19.04% had previous subaxial cervical spine surgery, 35.71% had a history of smoking (all had stopped smoking before surgery), and 11.90% had type II diabetes. At baseline, the majority of patients had a normal neurologic exam. The average preoperative NDI score was 26.88 ± 24.85, which improved to 10.59 ± 14.88 at the 1-year follow-up and 13.20 ± 14.96 at the 2-year follow-up (P=0.004). At baseline, 18% of the patients reported severe disability based on NDI score; this percentage decreased to 2% at 1 year and 0 at 2 years (P= 0.01). Importantly, a high percentage (11.90%) of patients had undergone previous subaxial cervical fusion for their pain due to a mistaken diagnosis for this condition, without symptom relief. In appropriately selected patients, PAAF may decrease neck pain and improve functional disability in patients with AAOA. Future prospective longitudinal studies are needed to corroborate these findings.

Are Preoperative PHQ-9 Scores Predictive of Postoperative Outcomes Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion?

This is a retrospective study. The objective of this study was to determine if there is an association between preoperative depression, as quantified by Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), and postoperative improvement in pain and disability after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Few studies have quantified depression symptoms in the preoperative period using PHQ-9 and have tracked patient-reported outcomes (PROs) following ACDF. Patients undergoing ACDF were retrospectively reviewed and stratified by their preoperative PHQ-9 score. PROs, including Neck Disability Index (NDI), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) neck and arm pain, and 12-Item Short Form (SF-12) Physical Component Score (PCS), were measured preoperatively and at 6-week, 3-month, 6-month, and 1-year postoperatively. PRO scores were analyzed amongst PHQ-9 cohorts using multiple linear regression. Achievement of minimum clinically important difference (MCID) was compared using χ analysis. Higher PHQ-9 scores were associated with increased preoperative NDI, VAS neck, and VAS arm scores and significantly lower SF-12 PCS scores preoperatively. Cohorts experienced similar VAS pain scores up to 1-year following surgery, except for VAS neck pain at 3 months when patients with greater depression symptoms had more pain. High PHQ-9 patients had higher NDI values at 6 weeks and 3-month marks but had similar NDI scores at 6 months and 1-year. Similarly, SF-12 PCS scores were lower for patients with a higher PHQ-9 score at 3 and 6 months, however, both groups had similar scores at 1-year follow-up. A greater percentage of the high PHQ-9 cohort achieved MCID for NDI, however, there were no differences in MCID achievement for VAS neck, VAS arm, or SF-12 PCS. Patients with worse preoperative mental health reported significantly greater preoperative disability and pain. However, both cohorts demonstrated similar clinical recovery at the 1-year follow-up. These findings suggest patients with worse preoperative mental health can expect significant improvements in PROs following surgery.

Does Cervical Sagittal Balance Affect the Preoperative Neck Disability Index in Patients With Cervical Myelopathy?

This was a retrospective study. This study aimed to ascertain the relationship between preoperative Neck Disability Index (NDI) scores and cervical sagittal alignment in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). Cervical alignment may influence postoperative clinical outcomes. However, the effect of preoperative sagittal balance on the preoperative status in CSM patients remains uncertain. From 2010 to 2016, 90 patients who underwent cervical surgery for CSM were enrolled. The inclusion criteria for this study included preoperative standing cervical radiographs and a preoperative NDI score. The following radiographic parameters were measured: (1) C0-C2 lordosis, (2) C2-C7 lordosis, (3) C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA), (4) neck tilt, (5) thoracic inlet angle, (6) T1 slope, and (7) T1 slope minus cervical lordosis (T1S-CL). The Pearson product-moment correlation coefficients were calculated between all radiographic variables and the NDI scores, and multiple regression analysis was performed to determine the independent predictors of high preoperative NDI scores. Both C2-C7 SVA and T1S-CL were positively correlated with NDI scores (r=0.732, P<0.001 and r=0.333, P=0.001). Cervical lordosis was negatively correlated with NDI scores (r=-0.267, P=0.011). Significant correlations were found between C2-C7 SVA and the C0-C2 Cobb angle (r=0.244, P=0.020), C2-C7 SVA and the C2-C7 Cobb angle (r=-0.359, P=0.001), the C2-C7 Cobb angle and the C0-C2 Cobb angle (r=-0.457, P<0.001), and the C2-C7 Cobb angle and T1 slope (r=-0.385, P<0.001). The disability of the neck increased with increasing C2-C7 SVA and T1S-CL and decreasing cervical lordosis before surgical reconstruction. High C2-C7 SVA, low thoracic inlet angle, and high neck tilt values are independent predictors of high preoperative NDI scores.

Posterior percutaneous endoscopic cervical foraminotomy and discectomy for degenerative cervical radiculopathy using intraoperative O-arm imaging.

IntroductionPosterior percutaneous endoscopic cervical foraminotomy and discectomy (P-PECD) is a minimally invasive technique for the treatment of degenerative cervical radiculopathy. The O-arm, an intraoperative mobile computed tomography (CT) scanner, may improve spine surgery outcomes.AimTo evaluate clinical outcomes of O-arm assisted P-PECD in patients with degenerative cervical radiculopathy.Material and methodsBetween January 2013 and January 2018, 32 patients with degenerative cervical radiculopathy who underwent P-PECD were followed up for 12 months. Their demographic, clinical and surgical data were reviewed retrospectively. All patients received intraoperative O-arm scanning to assess working cannula placement and decompression. The visual analogue scale (VAS), the neck disability index (NDI), and Odom’s criteria were used to evaluate clinical outcomes.ResultsCompared with preoperative values, mean NDI, neck-VAS, and arm-VAS scores were dramatically improved 1 week postoperatively, and the improvement was maintained for at least a year after surgery (from 27.6 ±10.5, 5.8 ±1.7, and 7.2 ±2.3 to 1.4 ±0.8, 1.1 ±0.8 and 0.9 ±0.6, respectively). According to Odom’s criteria, 27/32 patients (84.4%) reported excellent or good results. There were no permanent complications. One patient suffered from transient thumb weakness due to a cervical nerve root injury caused by the spinal needle.ConclusionsP-PECD aided by intraoperative O-arm imaging is a safe, effective, and minimally invasive procedure for treating degenerative cervical radiculopathy that can provide accurate cannula placement and thorough decompression.

309. Patient reported allergies: a marker of preoperative pain and disability in elective spine surgery

BACKGROUND CONTEXT Previous literature has demonstrated mixed results regarding the correlation between patient reported allergies and their pain, function, and satisfaction scores with elective spine surgery. A better understanding of the correlation is important for preoperative risk factor assessment and management. PURPOSE The objective of this study was to investigate the correlation between patient reported allergies and preoperative Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Neck Disability Index (NDI) and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement System (PROMIS) scores. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING Retrospective review at a single institution from May 2017-October 2018. PATIENT SAMPLE All patients undergoing elective cervical, thoracolumbar, and lumbar spine surgery at a single institution who had completed preoperative ODI, NDI, and PROMIS questionnaires. OUTCOME MEASURES The PROMIS, ODI and NDI scores were utilized. METHODS All patients undergoing elective cervical, lumbar procedures between May 2017 and October 2018 were included. Baseline demographic information was recorded, as well as all reported allergies or adverse reactions. PROMIS scores, ODI and NDI were recorded. Hierarchical multiple linear regressions were used to assess the relationship between total number of allergies and the preoperative pain and function scores. RESULTS A total of 570 patients were included (476 lumbar, 94 cervical). The mean number of allergies reported was 1.89 ± 2.32. The mean preoperative ODI and NDI scores were 46.39 ±17.67, and 43.47 ±16.51, respectively. The mean preoperative PROMIS Physical Health and PROMIS Mental Health scores were 37.21±6.54 and 43.89 ±9.26, respectively. Hierarchical multiple linear regression showed that total number of reported allergies shared a statistically significant negative relationship with all of the following scores: ODI (B = 0.83,p=.02), NDI (B = 1.45, p=.02), PROMIS Physical Health (B = -0.29, p=.013), PROMIS Mental Health (B = -0.38, p=.024). CONCLUSIONS Patient reported allergies share a statistically significant negative relationship with preoperative pain and function scores; as patients have increasing total number of allergies, the ODI/NDI scores become worse (increase), and the PROMIS scores become worse (decrease). FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs. Previous literature has demonstrated mixed results regarding the correlation between patient reported allergies and their pain, function, and satisfaction scores with elective spine surgery. A better understanding of the correlation is important for preoperative risk factor assessment and management. The objective of this study was to investigate the correlation between patient reported allergies and preoperative Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Neck Disability Index (NDI) and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement System (PROMIS) scores. Retrospective review at a single institution from May 2017-October 2018. All patients undergoing elective cervical, thoracolumbar, and lumbar spine surgery at a single institution who had completed preoperative ODI, NDI, and PROMIS questionnaires. The PROMIS, ODI and NDI scores were utilized. All patients undergoing elective cervical, lumbar procedures between May 2017 and October 2018 were included. Baseline demographic information was recorded, as well as all reported allergies or adverse reactions. PROMIS scores, ODI and NDI were recorded. Hierarchical multiple linear regressions were used to assess the relationship between total number of allergies and the preoperative pain and function scores. A total of 570 patients were included (476 lumbar, 94 cervical). The mean number of allergies reported was 1.89 ± 2.32. The mean preoperative ODI and NDI scores were 46.39 ±17.67, and 43.47 ±16.51, respectively. The mean preoperative PROMIS Physical Health and PROMIS Mental Health scores were 37.21±6.54 and 43.89 ±9.26, respectively. Hierarchical multiple linear regression showed that total number of reported allergies shared a statistically significant negative relationship with all of the following scores: ODI (B = 0.83,p=.02), NDI (B = 1.45, p=.02), PROMIS Physical Health (B = -0.29, p=.013), PROMIS Mental Health (B = -0.38, p=.024). Patient reported allergies share a statistically significant negative relationship with preoperative pain and function scores; as patients have increasing total number of allergies, the ODI/NDI scores become worse (increase), and the PROMIS scores become worse (decrease).

Patient-Reported Allergies, a Marker of Preoperative Pain and Disability in Elective Spine Surgery.

Study Design:Retrospective review.Objective:Previous literature demonstrates mixed results regarding the relationship between patient-reported allergies and pain, function, and satisfaction scores. The objective of this study was to investigate the correlation between patient-reported allergies and preoperative Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Neck Disability Index (NDI), and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement System (PROMIS) scores.Methods:All patients undergoing elective cervical, lumbar procedures between May 2017 and October 2018 were included. Baseline demographic information was recorded, as well as all reported allergies or adverse reactions. Preoperative PROMIS, ODI, and NDI scores were recorded. Hierarchical multiple linear regressions were used to assess the relationship between total number of allergies and the preoperative pain and function scores.Results:A total of 570 patients were included (476 lumbar, 94 cervical). The mean number of allergies reported was 1.89 ± 2.32. The mean preoperative ODI and NDI scores were 46.39 ± 17.67 and 43.47 ± 16.51, respectively. The mean preoperative PROMIS Physical Health and PROMIS Mental Health scores were 37.21 ± 6.54 and 43.89 ± 9.26, respectively. Hierarchical multiple linear regression showed that total number of reported allergies shared a statistically significant negative relationship with all of the following scores: ODI (B = 0.83, P = .02), NDI (B = 1.45, P = .02), PROMIS Physical Health (B = −0.29, P = .013), and PROMIS Mental Health (B = −0.38, P = .024).Conclusions:Patient-reported allergies share a statistically significant negative relationship with preoperative pain and function scores; as patients have increasing total number of allergies, the ODI/NDI scores become worse (increase) and the PROMIS scores become worse (decrease).