Preoperative Functional Scores Research Articles

Poster 172: Subpectoral open versus Arthroscopic Biceps Tenodesis with concomitant Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair does not impact ability to achieve Minimal Clinically Important Difference with use of Patient Reported Outcome Measurement System

Objectives: Disagreement exists within the current literature as to whether performing an arthroscopic vs. open subpectoral bicep tenodesis with concomitant arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) leads to significantly different outcomes. Therefore, the objective of this study is to use a matched cohort of patients who undergo arthroscopic versus subpectoral biceps repair with concomitant ARCR and assess if there is a significant difference in (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) PROMIS outcomes and the ability to achieve a minimal clinically important difference (MCID). Methods: Data from the electronic medical record, including operative reports, were retrospectively collected for patients who underwent ARCR performed by one of six fellowship-trained board-certified orthopedic surgeons at a single institution. Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) for open or arthroscopic biceps tenodesis with concomitant arthroscopic rotator cuff repair was used to identify patients who underwent this procedure concomitant with ARCR between 01/01/2016 to 12/31/2019.Preoperative PROMIS physical function (PF), pain interference (PI), and depression (Dep) scores were obtained at the closest date prior to arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, and postoperative scores were collected at every clinical visit thereafter. The final PROMIS score used for data analysis was determined by the patients’ PROMIS scores between 90 and 180 days. A delta PROMIS value was determined by taking the difference between the final PROMIS score and the preoperative score. Unadjusted bivariate analysis was performed to assess the differences in PROMIS outcomes between the two cohorts. The MCID was determined as one-half of the standard deviation of a given PROMIS value, which is consistent with the current orthopedic literature. Results: A total of 297 patients were identified underwent rotator cuff repair with concomitant biceps tenodesis. A total of 151 subjects underwent arthroscopic biceps tenodesis with concomitant ARCR, while 147 underwent open subpectoral bicep tenodesis. The average time to follow up was 132.2 days for the arthroscopic cohort and 136.3 days for the subpectoral open group.Bivariate analysis demonstrated no significant difference between the two cohorts for insurance, race, ethnicity, last PROMIS input day, mechanism of injury, ASA class, or Charleston Comorbidity Index (CCI). There was a significant difference for patients who required contaminant subscapularis repair (p < 0.001) and revision surgery (p < 0.001).Unadjusted t-test analysis showed that patients in the arthroscopic biceps tenodesis cohort had significantly higher postoperative PROMIS PF and lower PROMIS PI and Dep scores. (P = 0.001, P = 0.001, and P = 0.007, respectively) when compared to their preoperative PROMIS values. The subpectoral open biceps tenodesis cohort did not show a significant difference in the postoperative PROMIS Dep score when compared to its preoperative score (P = 0.18), but it did show a significant improvement for postoperative PROMIS PF and PI (P = 0.001 and P = 0.04, respectively). No significant difference was determined between the arthroscopic bicep and subpectoral bicep tenodesis cohorts for delta PROMIS PF, PI, and Dep (P = 0.50, P = 0.51, and P = 0.10, respectively). A chi-square analysis found no significant difference between the achievement of MCID for PROMIS PF, PI, and Dep (P = 0.64, P = 0.72, and P = 0.95, respectively). Finally, no significant difference was determined between the time it took to achieve a minimal clinically important difference for PROMIS PF, PI, or Dep for patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with concomitant arthroscopic biceps tenodesis when compared to subpectoral open biceps tenodesis. Conclusions: The objective of this study was to assess differences in PROMIS outcomes for patients who undergo ARCR with concomitant arthroscopic or open subpectoral bicep tenodesis. The main findings of our study highlighted that patients with arthroscopic biceps tenodesis showed significant improvement at six months for PROMIS PF, PI, and Dep, whereas those who underwent an open subpectoral approach showed significant improvement in PF and PI but not Dep. Our findings suggest there may be a slight benefit for patients who undergo arthroscopic tenodesis when compared a subpectoral open approach. However, no significant differences were found between the two cohorts for PROMIS or the time to reach MCID. Therefore, suggesting the modality of bicep tenodesis with concomitant ARCR does not impact patient outcomes at 6-month follow-up. [Table: see text][Table: see text][Table: see text]

Preoperative Quality of Life and Mental Health Can Predict Postoperative Outcomes and Quality of Life after Colorectal Cancer Surgery.

Background and Objectives: It remains unclear which domains of preoperative health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and mental health are predictive of postoperative clinical and patient-reported outcomes in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. Materials and Methods: A prospective cohort of 78 CRC patients undergoing elective curative surgery was recruited. The EORTC QLQ-C30 and HADS questionnaires were administered preoperatively and one month after surgery. Results: Preoperative cognitive functioning scores (95% CI 0.131-1.158, p = 0.015) and low anterior resection (95% CI 14.861-63.260, p = 0.002) independently predicted poorer 1-month postoperative global QOL. When postoperative complications were represented using the comprehensive complication index (CCI), poorer preoperative physical function scores were associated with higher CCI scores (B = -0.277, p = 0.014). Preoperative social function score (OR = 0.925, 95% CI 0.87 to 0.99; p = 0.019) was an independent predictor for 30-day readmission, while physical functioning score (OR = -0.620, 95% CI -1.073--0.167, p = 0.008) was inversely related to the length of hospitalization. The overall regressions for 1-month postoperative global QOL (R2: 0.546, F: 1.961, p = 0.023) and 30-day readmission (R2: 0.322, χ2: 13.129, p < 0.001) were statistically significant. Conclusions: Various QLQ-C30 domains were found to be predictive of postoperative outcomes, including complications, readmission, and length of hospitalization. Preoperative cognitive dysfunction and low AR were independent predictors of poorer postoperative global QOL. Future research should seek to examine the efficacy of targeting specific baseline QOL domains in improving clinical as well as patient-reported outcomes after CRC surgery.

Marginalization Influences Access, Outcomes, and Discharge Destination Following Total Joint Arthroplasty in Canada’s Universal Healthcare System

BackgroundThe influence of socioeconomic status on outcomes following total joint arthroplasty (TJA) in the Canadian single-payer healthcare system is yet to be elucidated. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the impact of socioeconomic status on TJA outcomes. MethodsThis was a retrospective review of 7,304 consecutive TJA (4,456 knees and 2,848 hips) performed between January 1, 2001 and December 31, 2019. The primary independent variable was the average census marginalization index. The primary dependent variable was functional outcome scores. ResultsThe most marginalized patients in both the hip and knee cohorts had significantly worse preoperative and postoperative functional scores. Patients in the most marginalized quintile (V) showed a decreased odds of achieving a minimal important difference in functional scores at 1-year follow-up (odds ratio [OR] 0.44; 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.20, 0.97], P = .043). Patients in the knee cohort in the most marginalized quintiles (IV and V) had increased odds of being discharged to an inpatient facility with an OR of 2.07 (95% CI [1.06, 4.04], P = .033) and OR of 2.57 (95% CI [1.26, 5.22], P = .009), respectively. Patients in the hip cohort in V quintile (most marginalized) had increased odds of being discharged to an inpatient facility with an OR of 2.24 (95% CI [1.02, 4.96], P = .046). ConclusionDespite being a part of the Canadian universal single-payer healthcare system, the most marginalized patients had worse preoperative and postoperative function, and had increased odds of being discharged to another inpatient facility. Level of EvidenceIV.

Influence of Preoperative Sagittal Alignment on Functional Recovery in Operated Cases of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.

Objective We examine the influence of preoperative cervical sagittal curvature (lordotic or nonlordotic) on the functional recovery of surgically managed cases of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). The impact of sagittal alignment on the functional improvement of operated CSM cases has not been thoroughly investigated. Materials and Methods We did retrospective analysis of consecutively operated cases of CSM from March 2019 to April 2021. Patients were grouped into two categories: lordotic curvature (with Cobb angle > 10 degrees) and nonlordotic curvature (including neutral [Cobb angle 0-10 degrees] and kyphotic [Cobb angle < 0 degrees]). Demographic data, and preoperative and postoperative functional outcome scores (modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association [mJOA] and Nurick grade) were analyzed for dependency on preoperative curvature, and correlations between outcomes and sagittal parameters were assessed. Results In the analysis of 124 cases, 63.1% (78 cases) were lordotic (mean Cobb angle of 23.57 ± 9.1 degrees; 11-50 degrees) and 36.9% (46 cases) were nonlordotic (mean Cobb angle of 0.89 ± 6.5 degrees; -11 to 10 degrees), 32 cases (24.6%) had neutral alignment, and 14 cases (12.3%) had kyphotic alignment. At the final follow-up, the mean change in mJOA score, Nurick grade, and functional recovery rate (mJOArr) were not significantly different between the lordotic and nonlordotic group. In the nonlordotic group, cases with anterior surgery had a significantly better mJOArr than those with posterior surgery ( p = 0.04), whereas there was similar improvement with either approach in lordotic cases. In the nonlordotic group, patients who gained lordosis (78.1%) had better recovery rates than those who had lost lordosis (21.9%). However, this difference was not statistically significant. Conclusion We report noninferiority of the functional outcome in the cases with preoperative nonlordotic alignment when compared with those with lordotic alignment. Further, nonlordotic patients who were approached anteriorly fared better than those approached posteriorly. Although increasing sagittal imbalance in nonlordotic spines portend toward higher preoperative disability, gain in lordosis in such cases may improve results. We recommend further studies with larger nonlordotic subjects to elucidate the impact of sagittal alignment on functional outcome.

The Extended Pterional Approach Allows Satisfactory Results for the Resection of Huge Medial Sphenoid Ridge Meningioma

To investigate the surgical method and efficacy of the extended pterional approach in the resection of huge medial sphenoid ridge meningiomas (MSRMs). Retrospective analysis of clinical data from 41 patients diagnosed with MSRMs (diameter ≥4.0cm) from Nanjing Brain Hospital between January 2012 and February 2022 was conducted. Within 24hours after surgery, head computed tomography and magnetic resonance imagingwere reviewed to evaluate the extent of tumor resection based on Simpson grading. Cranial magnetic resonance imagingwas repeated 3 to 60months after surgery to assess tumor recurrence or progression. Preoperative, discharge, and follow-up Karnofsky functional status scores (KPS) were assessed to determine patients' functional status. Repeated-measures analysis of variance was utilized to compare KPS at preoperative, hospital discharge, and final follow-up. The 41 selected cases included 38 cases (92.7%) of Simpson I-III resection and 3 cases (7.3%) of Simpson IV resection. All the cases had typical pathological features and definite pathological diagnoses. There were 2 recurrent tumors and 4 progressed tumors when the patients were followed up from 3months to 60months after operations. The results demonstrated that the KPS score at the final follow-up (91.4±9.6) was higher than at hospital discharge (85.3±8.9) and preoperation (78.2±8.5) (F=69.46, P= 0.033). The use of the extended pterional approach in the resection of huge MSRMs appears to be an effective surgical method. Careful dissection and preservation of vascular and neural structures, as well as meticulous microsurgical techniques in managing cavernous sinus tumors, can lead to reduced surgical complications and improved treatment outcomes.

Comparison of All-Polyethylene Tibial Versus Metal-Backed Tibial Component in Total Knee Replacement Surgery

Introduction: Total knee replacement (TKR) is the most successful procedure in Orthopedics. The selection of an ideal implant relies on better survivorship, restoration of functional activities and cost-effectiveness. This study compared the effectiveness of all-polyethylene (AP) versus metal-backed tibial (MTB) implant in TKR patients in terms of objective and subjective patient related outcomes. Objectives: To compare the effectiveness of all-polyethylene tibial implants versus metal-backed tibial implants in total knee replacement patients in terms of improvement in the American Knee Society Score (AKSS). Methodology: It was a nonrandomized controlled trial done in the Orthopaedic Department of the Sharif Medical City Hospital, Lahore, after approval by the institutional ethical committee. Fifty patients of grade IV knee joint osteoarthritis for greater than six months were included by nonprobability convenient sampling technique. The patients were allocated equally into standard treatment and intervention groups; patients underwent TKR with MTB implants in the standard group and AP implants in the intervention group after taking informed written consent. The AKSS score was calculated pre-operatively, 3 months and 6 months after surgery by the team member not involved in surgical planning. Results: A statistically significant improvement was observed in pre-operative to post-operative knee scores (p-value = 0.004) and functional scores (p-value = 0.001) with TKR. When the means of knee scores were compared between AP and MTB implants, there was no significant difference between the two groups between pre-operative and post-operative knee scores and functional scores. Practical implication Conclusion: There is no significant difference in knee score between the all-polyethylene and metal-backed implants regarding pain and functional status. All-polyethylene implants are a better substitute for MTB implants due to their cost-effectiveness, particularly in countries with financial constraints. The most practical implication of the current study is health economics. In a developing country with a low per capita income, expensive implants can be swapped with low cost implants to bring the cost of the procedure down. Keywords: All-polyethylene tibial, Metal-backed tibial, Total knee replacement, American Knee Society Score, AKSS.

Comparing Pain and Pain Coping Mechanisms in Patients Undergoing Total Joint Arthroplasty as Part of a Mission Trip to Those in the United States

BackgroundAccess to total joint arthroplasty can be difficult in low-resource settings. Service trips are conducted to provide arthroplasty care to populations in need around the world. This study aimed to compare the pain, function, surgical expectations, and coping mechanisms of patients from one such service trip to the United States. MethodsIn 2019, the Operation Walk program conducted a service trip in Guyana during which 50 patients had hip or knee arthroplasties. Patient demographics, patient-reported outcome measures, questionnaires assessing pain attitudes and coping, and pain visual analog scales were collected preoperatively and at 3 months postoperatively. These outcomes were compared with a matched cohort of elective total joint arthroplasty at a US tertiary care medical center. There were 37 patients matched between the 2 cohorts. ResultsThe mission cohort had significantly lower preoperative self-reported function scores than the US cohort (38.3 versus 47.5, P = .003), as well as a significantly larger improvement at 3 months (42.4 versus 26.4, P = .014). The mission cohort had significantly higher initial pain (8.0 versus 7.0, P = .015), but there were no differences with regard to pain at 3 months (P = .420) or change in pain (P = .175). The mission cohort had significantly greater preoperative scores in pain attitude and coping responses. ConclusionPatients in low-resource settings were more likely to have preoperative functional limitations and pain, and they coped with pain through prayer. Understanding the key differences between these 2 types of populations and how they approach pain and functional limitations may help improve care for each group. Level of EvidenceII, prospective study.

Effect of preoperative anterior bony impingement on lateral collateral ankle ligament reconstruction

Objective: To explore whether the combination of anterior bony impingement before surgery will affect the efficacy of the lateral collateral ankle ligament reconstruction surgery in patients with chronic ankle instability (CAI). Methods: A prospective cohort study. Patients with CAI who underwent lateral collateral ankle ligament reconstruction from January 2014 to October 2017 in the Department of Sports Medicine, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University were enrolled in this study. The patients were divided into no bony impingement group (NI group) and bony impingement group (BI group) according to the presence of bone impingement in front of the ankle during the operation. Preoperative American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, Karlsson ankle functional socre (KAFS), Tegner score, visual analogue scale (VAS) of pain were extracted and were reevaluated at least 2 years after surgery as well as imaging evaluation of ankle. Results: A total of 59 patients were enrolled in this study. There were 29 patients in the NI group, 23 males and 6 females with a mean age of (28.4±7.1) years. And there were 30 cases in the BI group, 28 males and 2 females with a mean age of (31.9±8.6) years. The AOFAS, KAFS and Tegner scores in NI group increased from 65.8±10.6, 65.9±10.1 and 3.0 (3.0, 4.0) before the operation to 97.5±4.3, 97.8±4.7 and 6.0(5.0,6.0) after the operation, respectively; and the VAS decreased from 3.0(3.0, 4.0) to 0(0, 0); there were significant differences in those indexes before and after the operation (all P<0.05). The scores of AOFAS, KAFS and Tegner in BI group increased from 65.2±11.0, 64.2±10.0 and 3.0(3.0, 4.0) before the operation to 97.1±4.3, 97.3±4.3 and 5.0(4.0, 6.0) post the operation, respectively; and the VAS scores decreased from 3.0(3.0, 5.0) to 0(0, 1.0); there were significant differences in up-mentioned indexes before and after the surgery (all P<0.05). There was no significant differences in baseline and preoperative clinical function scores between the two groups (all P>0.05). No significant difference was found in postoperative AOFAS, KAFS and VAS scores between the two groups (all P>0.05), while postoperative Tegner score in the NI group was significantly higher than that in the BI group [6.0(5.0, 6.0) vs 5.0(4.0, 6.0), P=0.026]. Imaging evaluation of all patients showed that the reconstructed ligament was clearly visible, and the intraarticular injuries existing before surgery showed obvious signs of healing. Conclusion: Ankle lateral collateral ligament reconstruction for CAI with or without anterior bony impingement results in similar outcomes in ankle function, stability and pain levels.

Preoperative flexion contracture does not affect outcome in total knee arthroplasty: A case-control study of 2,634 TKAs

BackgroundOne issue in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is management of preoperative flexion contracture, which may be associated with poor functional outcome. AimThe aim of this study was to compare functional results in TKA with or without preoperative flexion contracture, treated according to a standardized algorithm of tissue release and bone cut. Patients and methodA single-center retrospective case-control study was performed on prospectively collected data for the period 1987–2016. Patients with >10̊ flexion contracture were assigned to the “contracture” group and associated to a selected control group at a ratio of 1:4. Clinical analysis used pre and post-operative International Knee Society (IKS) scores. The significance threshold was set at p<0.05. ResultsEight hundred and forty-nine cases and 3,304 controls were included, comprising a total of 2,838 male and 1,315 female participants. Mean preoperative extension deficit was 13̊±6̊ in the contracture group and 1̊±2̊ in controls. Preoperative IKS total and functional scores were significantly poorer in the contracture group (38±18 and 54±20) than in controls (52±16 and 59±19) (p<0.001). Postoperatively, the two groups did not significantly differ in IKS functional score (77±22 vs. 79±21, p=0.143). There were differences in IKS knee score (87±12 vs. 88±13, p=0.006) and maximal flexion (114̊±14̊ vs. 119̊±13̊, p<0.0001) that were statistically, but not clinically, significant. DiscussionA systematic standardized algorithm for surgical treatment of flexion contracture during primary total knee arthroplasty provided clinical outcomes similar to those of patients without preoperative flexion contracture. Level of evidenceIII; case-control study.

The Impact of Elective Surgical Restriction during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Shoulder and Elbow Surgery: patient perceptions.

In late 2019 and early 2020 a novel coronavirus (Covid-19) spread across the world creating a global pandemic. In the state of Pennsylvania, non-emergent, elective operations were temporarily delayed from proceeding with normal standard of care. The primary purpose of this study was to determine the proportion of patients who required prescription pain medication during the surgical delay. Secondarily, we sought to determine the proportion of patients who perceived their surgery as non-elective and evaluate how symptoms were managed during the delay. A single institutional database was used to retrospectively identify all shoulder and elbow surgeries scheduled between March 13, 2020 and May 6, 2020. Charts were manually reviewed. Patients who underwent non-shoulder and elbow related procedures and patients of surgeons outside of Pennsylvania were excluded. Patients whose surgeries were "postponed" or "canceled" were administered a survey evaluating how symptoms were managed and perceptions regarding the delay. Preoperative functional scores were collected. Statistical analysis was performed to determine associations between procedure status, preoperative functional scores, perception of surgery, and requirement for prescription pain medication. 338 patients were scheduled for shoulder/elbow surgery at our practice in Pennsylvania. 89 patients (26.3%) underwent surgery as initially scheduled. 179 patients (71.9%) had their surgeries postponed. 70 patients (28.1%) canceled surgery. The average delay in surgery was 86.7 days (range, 13-299 days). 176 (70.7%) patients who were postponed or canceled responded to the survey. 39 patients (22.2%) required prescription pain medication during the delay. 73 patients (41%) considered their procedure to be elective in nature. 137 patients (78%) would have moved forward with surgery if done safely under appropriate medical guidelines. Lower preoperative ASES and SANE scores (r= -0.36, p<0.001; r=-0.26, p=0.016, respectively), and higher preoperative VAS scores were correlated with requiring prescription pain medication (r=0.28, p=0.009). Higher preoperative ASES score was positively correlated with perception of surgery as elective (r=0.4; p<0.001). Patients undergoing elective shoulder and elbow surgery during the Covid-19 pandemic experienced a delay of nearly 3 months on average. Fewer than half of patients perceived their surgeries as elective procedures. Nearly a quarter of patients surveyed required extra prescription pain medicine during their delay. This study elucidates the fact that while orthopedic shoulder and elbow surgery is generally considered "elective" it is more important to a majority of patients. These findings may also be applicable to future potential mandated surgical care delays by other third- party organizations.

Patient-reported Outcomes of Revision Ankle Open Reduction Internal Fixation

Ankle fractures may require revision surgery for malunion or suboptimal joint congruence results after initial surgical or nonsurgical treatment. There is limited literature on the outcomes of patients undergoing such revision surgery for ankle fracture malunion. In this retrospective case series, we determined clinical and functional outcomes of revision ankle open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) for 7 patients with ankle fracture malunion through patient-reported and radiographic outcomes. Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System physical function and pain interference scores prerevision and postrevision procedure were obtained from 7 patients treated from January 2017 to October 2020. Postoperative complications including persistent pain, infection, hardware removal, hardware failure, and conversion to ankle arthrodesis were analyzed. Seven patients who underwent revision ORIF surgery for ankle fracture malunion between January 2017 and October 2020 were included. The average age was 46.3 12.2 years old; 85.7% of the patients were female; 14.3% were male. The average amount of time between revision ORIF procedure and collection of postoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System scores was 19.3±5.9 months. Each of the 7 patients showed an increase in physical function after revision surgery (average preoperative physical function score: 30.7; average postoperative physical function score: 48.9). All patients showed a decrease in pain after revision surgery (average preoperative pain interference score: 64.8; average postoperative pain interference score: 55.7). Of the 7 participants who underwent revision ORIF, a majority did not experience any complications at least 1 year postprocedure, including infection, reoperation, or hardware removal. One participant underwent hardware removal for persistent pain and developed overlying cellulitis. For patients with ankle fracture malunion without significant post-traumatic degenerative changes of the ankle joint, revision ankle ORIF can be an effective method for improving physical function, decreasing pain, and preserving ankle joint motion. Level of Evidence: Level IV—case series.

Propensity score-matched study of uni-condylar arthroplasty in elderly patients with knee osteoarthritis

To investigate the clinical efficacy of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis in patients over 75 years old. The clinical efficacy of primary fixed platform UKA in patients with osteoarthritis, was retrospectively analyzed from October 2014 to November 2020. Age, body mass index (BMI), range of motion (ROM), preoperative joint function score, the quality of life score and other preoperative indicators were measured by propensity score matching (PSM). The patients were divided into elderly group (≥75 years old) and control group (<75 years old). Oxford knee score(OKS), Western Ontario McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index(WOMAC), Short Form-12 including physical component summary (PCS), mental component summary(MCS), minimal clinically important difference(MCID ) and clinical complications were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively. A total of 514 patients were analyzed, 428 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. A propensity-score matching study was conducted to eliminate confounding factors. After 1∶2 propensity match, there were 84 patients in elderly group (≥75 years), age ranged from 75 to 88 years old, with an average of (78.79±3.08) years old, and 168 patients in control group (<75 years), age ranged from 47 to 74 years old, with an average of (64.10±5.96)years old. The follow-up duration of two groups ranged from 12 to 84 months with an average of (29.35±16.52) months in elderly group, and 12 to 85 months with an average of (31.83±17.34) months in control group. There was only significant difference in age between the elderly and control groups preoperatively (P<0.01). Postoperatively, the elderly group showed significantly higher WOMAC (P<0.01) and lower SF-12 PCS scores (P<0.01) as compared to the control group. There was no significant difference between the elderly group and the control group in knee range of motion, OKS and the proportion of each scoring system reaching the minimum clinical difference value (P>0.05). In the aspect of preperative complications, the elderly group exhibited more surgical site complications and postoperative delirium compared to control group(P<0.05). The differences in other indicators including deep vein thrombosis, acute urinary retention, cardiovascular events, cerebrovascular events and radiolucent lines around prothesis were not statistically significant(P>0.05). UKA in the treatment of elderly patients over 75 years old with knee osteoarthritis was safe and feasible, and could obtain satisfactory short-term efficacy.

DOES SOCIOECONOMIC DEPRIVATION INFLUENCE PATIENT OUTCOMES AFTER PERIACETABULAR OSTEOTOMY?

Higher levels of socioeconomic deprivation have been associated with worse health outcomes. The influence of socioeconomic deprivation on patients undergoing periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) has not previously been investigated.A total of 217 patients (171 female, 46 male; median age 23.4 years) who underwent PAO by a single surgeon were identified. Patients were categorised into three groups according to their New Zealand Deprivation (NZDep) Index: minimal deprivation (NZDep Index 1–3, n=89), moderate deprivation (NZDep Index 4-6, n=94), and maximal deprivation (NZDep Index 7-10, n=34). The three groups were compared with respect to baseline variables, surgical details, complications, and pre-operative and two-year post-operative functional scores (including International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12), EQ-5D quality of life score, and University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) activity score). Multivariate regression was undertaken to assess for the effect of NZDep Index on patient outcomes.Patients in the maximal deprivation group were more likely to be Māori (p&lt;0.001) and have surgery in a public rather than a private hospital (p=0.004), while the minimal deprivation group demonstrated a lower BMI (p=0.005). There were otherwise no other significant differences in baseline variables, surgical details, complications, nor pre-operative or two-year post-operative functional scores between the three groups (all p&gt;0.05). Multivariate analysis identified a higher NZDep Index to be independently predictive of a lower pre-operative UCLA activity score (p=0.014) and a higher two-year iHOT-12 score (p&lt;0.001).Our results demonstrate an inequality in access to PAO, with patients exposed to higher levels of socioeconomic deprivation under-represented in our study population. When provided access to PAO, these vulnerable patients achieve significant functional improvement at least as great as patients with less socioeconomic deprivation. Initiatives to improve access to hip preservation care in socioeconomically deprived populations appear warranted.

Functional recovery after total hip/knee replacement in obese people: A systematic review.

Several studies have investigated the influence of body mass index (BMI) on functional gain after total hip replacement (THR) or total knee replacement (TKR) in osteoarthritis, with contradictory results. This systematic literature review was conducted to ascertain whether obesity affects functional recovery after THR or TKR in the short (<1 year), medium (<3 years) and long term (>3 years). The study was registered with PROSPERO and conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. A systematic literature search was conducted across Medline and EMBASE databases for articles published between 1980 and 2020 that investigated patient-reported measures of functional recovery after THR and TKR in participants with osteoarthritis and obesity (defined as BMI ≥30kg/m2). Twenty-six articles reporting on 68,840 persons (34,955 for THR and 33,885 for TKR) were included in the final analysis: 5 case-control studies, 21 cohort studies (9 for THR only, 10 for TKR only and 2 for both). The average minimum follow-up was 36.4 months, ranging from 6 weeks to 10 years. Most studies found significantly lower pre-operative patient-reported functional scores for participants with obesity. After THR, there was a small difference in functional recovery in favor of those without obesity in the short term (<6 months), but the difference remained below the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) threshold and disappeared in the medium and long term. After TKR, functional recovery was better for those with obesity than those without in the first year, similar until the third year, and then decreased thereafter. Although there is a paucity of high-quality evidence, our findings show substantial functional gains in people with obesity after total joint replacement. Functional recovery after THR or TKR does not significantly differ, or only slightly differs, between those with and without obesity, and the difference in functional gain is not clinically important. CRD42018112919.

COST AND OUTCOME ANALYSIS OF DISTAL INTERPHALANGEAL JOINT ARTHRODESIS BETWEEN K-WIRES AND HEADLESS COMPRESSION SCREWS

Distal interphalangeal joint (DIPJ) fusion using a k-wire has been the gold standard treatment for DIPJ arthritis. Recent studies have shown similar patient outcomes with the headless compression screws (HCS), however there has been no cost analysis to compare the two. Therefore, this study aims to 1) review the cost of DIPJ fusion between k-wire and HCS 2) compare functional outcome and patient satisfaction between the two groups.A retrospective review was performed over a nine-year period from 2012-2021 in Counties Manukau. Cost analysis was performed between patients who underwent DIPJ fusion with either HCS or k-wire. Costs included were surgical cost, repeat operations and follow-up clinic costs. The difference in pre-operative and post-operative functional and pain scores were also compared using the patient rate wrist/hand evaluation (PRWHE).Of the 85 eligible patients, 49 underwent fusion with k-wires and 36 had HCS. The overall cost was significantly lower in the HCS group which was 6554 New Zealand Dollars (NZD), whereas this was 10408 NZD in the k-wire group (p&lt;0.0001). The adjusted relative risk of 1.3 indicate that the cost of k-wires is 1.3 times more than HCS (P=0.0053). The patients’ post-operative PRWHE pain (−22 vs −18, p&lt;0.0001) and functional scores (−38 vs −36, p&lt;0.0001) improved significantly in HCS group compared to the k-wire group.Literatures have shown similar DIPJ fusion outcomes between k-wire and HCS. K-wires often need to be removed post-operatively due to the metalware irritation. This leads to more surgical procedures and clinic follow-ups, which overall increases the cost of DIPJ fusion with k-wires.DIPJ fusion with HCS is a more cost-effective with a lower surgical and follow-up costs compared to the k-wiring technique. Patients with HCS also tend to have a significant improvement in post-operative pain and functional scores.

Better PROMs and higher return-to-sport rate after modular bicompartmental knee arthroplasty than after total knee arthroplasty for medial and patellofemoral compartment osteoarthritis.

Theoretical advantages of bicompartmental knee arthroplasty (BKA) over total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for bicompartmental (medial combined with patellofemoral) osteoarthritis (OA) are still unclear. This study aimed to compare patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and return-to-sport (RTS) rate between modular BKA and TKA in early follow-up. Twenty-five consecutive modular BKA cases with a minimum 2-year follow-up were matched with 50 TKA cases at 1:2 ratio. Demographic data and preoperative functional scores, including the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and Knee Society Scores (KSSs), were analyzed to ensure comparability. Postoperative WOMAC score, KSS, range of motion (ROM), Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12), and RTS rates were compared. Operative time and blood loss were also analyzed. Significant differences in the WOMAC-function (median 97.1 vs. 89.7, p < 0.001) and KSS-function (median 90.0 vs. 80.0, p = 0.003) scores were identified between the BKA and TKA groups. ROM was significantly greater in the BKA group than in the TKA group (median 125.0° vs. 120.0°, p = 0.004), in addition to the FJS-12 (median 89.6 vs. 53.1, p < 0.001). The overall RTS rate was significantly higher in the BKA group than in the TKA group (71.6% vs. 56.5%, p = 0.039). Operative time was significantly longer in the BKA group than in the TKA group (median 105.0 vs. 67.5 min, p < 0.001), but blood loss was similar (median 557.6 vs. 450.7 ml, p = 0.334). Modular BKA demonstrated better functional recovery, better joint perception, and higher RTS rate than TKA; thus, modular BKA can be a good alternative for bicompartmental OA.

Primary constrained condylar knee arthroplasty in severe varus deformity: a prospective 5-year functional follow-up study in Iraqi patients.

The outcomes of the constrained condylar knee (CCK) implant used during primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in knees with severe varus in patients from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) such as Iraq are not known. Hence, this study aimed to analyze and report the functional outcome of CCK TKA in patients with severe varus deformities at the end of 5 years in Iraqi patients. In this prospective study, pre- and post-operative (at the end of 5years) clinical outcome using Knee Society Score (KSS) and radiological deformity using hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle was analyzed in 76 CCK TKAs (20 bilateral and 36 unilateral TKAs) performed in 56 patients with severe varus deformity (> 15°). At a mean follow-up of 60.3months (range 60-68months), the mean preoperative KSS knee score of 6.6 ± 4.5 improved significantly (p < 0.0001) to 87.2 ± 6.6 and the mean preoperative KSS function score of 7.1 ± 6.4 improved significantly (p < 0.0001) to 70.4 ± 7.8. The function score was good to excellent in 64.3% (36 patients), fair in 28.5% (16 patients), and poor in 7.1% (4 patients) at the end of 5years. The mean preoperative HKA angle significantly improved (p < 0.001) from 25.5° ± 6° varus (range 17°-37°) to 3° ± 2.5° varus (range 0°-7.5°) at final follow-up. The CCK implant significantly improved pain and function in patients with severe varus deformity at the end of 5years. The CCK implant is a good option during primary TKA in severe varus knees in patients from LMICs and can help achieve clinical outcomes similar to patients from high-income countries.

Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) risk stratification for adverse events at one year follow-up: the role of preoperative functional capacity scores, age, BNP and hemoglobin

The aim of the study was to evaluate combination of functional status tools (American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification System (ASA PS)) status, Metabolic Equivalent of Task (METs), Revised Cardiac Risk Index for Pre-Operative Risk (RCRI) largely used in preoperative risk assessment with humoral variables in building powerful predictive models of Major Adverse Cardiac Cerebrovascular Events (MACCE) in a one-year follow-up after carotid endoarterectomy (CEA). All consecutive patients undergoing CEA during a 12-month period, were enrolled in this prospective observational study. Demographic data, functional capacity (FC) measured by risk stratification scores RCRI, ASA physical status, METs and preoperative levels of hemoglobin and Brain Natriuretic Peptide (Pro-BNP), coexisting comorbidities, have been collected. 201 consecutive patients undergoing CEA under local anesthesia (men 137 (68.16%), women 64 (31.84%)) with a median age of 75 years (Interquartile range (IQR) 67–80 years), Body mass index (BMI) median of 26.23 (IQR 24.4–28.89) were enrolled. Combination of all variables studied leave at a good one-year prognostic tool with AUC of 0.93 (Sensitivity (SEN) 46.6, Specificity (SPEC) 95.7). Preoperative hemoglobin correlate with Major Adverse Cardiac Cerebrovascular Events (MACCE) at 3 months (p = 0.018), while the preoperative BNP at 12 months shows correlation with adverse events (p = 0.004). Age has a significant correlation with adverse events at 12 months between demographic and anthropometric factors (p = 0.002). MACCE may adversely affect short- and long-term outcomes after CEA. Evaluation of preoperative functional capacity by RCRI, ASA physical status and METs combined with age and biomarkers such as pro-BNP and hemoglobin, may improve risk stratification in patients undergoing carotid surgery.

The Importance of Patient Resilience on Outcomes Following Foot and Ankle Orthopaedic Surgery

Category: Other; Ankle Introduction/ Purpose: Recovery from orthopedic surgery requires a degree of both physical and mental resilience during recovery and rehabilitation. The brief resilience scale (BRS) is a validated and reliable 6-item screening tool that measures resilience as the ability to bounce back or recover from stress. BRS can provide unique and important information about patients coping with health-related stressors. To date, there is little evidence describing the use of BRS as a pre-operative benchmark to evaluate outcomes following foot and ankle orthopedic injuries and procedures. We aim to determine how patient resilience, as measured with BRS, may predict the impact of orthopedic conditions and recovery from foot and ankle surgery. Methods: All patients undergoing foot and ankle orthopedic surgery at a single institution were enrolled in U-COSMOS, a HIPAA-compliant, automated outcomes data repository. All patients undergoing surgery completed BRS pre-operatively. We used a BRS cutoff of &lt; 3 (lower resilience, LR), 3-3.9 (intermediate resilience, IR), and &gt;=4 (high resilience, HR) to create three cohorts. Patients also completed a PROMIS Physical Function (PF) Computer Adaptive Test (CAT), PROMISE Pain Interference (PI) CAT, PROMISE Depression (D) CAT, and Global Health (GH) Short Form pre-operatively as well as 3-, 6-, 12-, and 24- months post-operatively, as applicable. Patients with a minimum follow-up of 180 days were included for analysis, and the longest available follow-up was used. Differences in outcomes between the three BRS groups were determined non-parametrically using a Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance. Results: A total of 586 patients were included for analysis, with an average follow-up of 389 days. The patients were categorized as low resilience (n=44), intermediate resilience (n=229), and high resilience (n=323). Patients in the high resilience cohort had significantly higher PF and lower PI and Depression scores both pre-operatively (p &lt; 0.05 for all) and post-operatively (p &lt; 0.001 for all). The greatest disparity was found in depression where low resilience patients were greater than 1 SD worse than high resilience patients (Figure 1). Similar trends are observed for physical and mental global health. In addition to having higher absolute baseline and follow-up scores, the change of PF and PI is also significantly higher for high resilience patients (p = 0.02). Conclusion: Patients with high pre-operative resilience demonstrate better pre-operative physical function and pain interference scores compared to lower resilience patients and show greater improvement at 12 months post-op. We also found that lower BRS scores are associated with decreased pre- and post-operative mental health outcomes, including PROMIS Depression. Further analysis of the role of BRS in pre-operative assessment will help guide shared treatment decision-making. Identifying interventions for patients with low resilience will likely lead to improve surgical outcomes.

Can Patients Accurately Recall their Preoperative Pain and Functional Scores Following Rotator Cuff Repair and Total Shoulder Arthroplasty?

Accurate analysis of preoperative shoulder pain and function is important for understanding treatment efficacy and producing high-quality research. Oftentimes, preoperative patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are missing. Therefore the accuracy of recalled preoperative PROs may be important. We investigate the ability of patients who underwent rotator cuff repair (RCR) or shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) to recall their preoperative PROs. We identified 145 patients who underwent either RCR or TSA and had preoperative PROs. All patients completed the ASES, SANE, SST, and VAS surveys within 3 months prior to surgery. Patients were contacted between one and four years after surgery and asked to recall their baseline pain and shoulder function prior to surgery. The mean difference was calculated by determining the difference between the mean recalled score and the mean actual score. Intraobserver reliability analysis was performed, comparing recall and actual score for each using the 2-way mixed-effects intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) model. The ICC values > 0.75 were considered excellent, values between 0.4 and 0.75 were considered moderate, and values of < 0.4 demonstrated a weak agreement. For patients who underwent RCR, the mean differences between actual and recalled ASES, SANE, SST and VAS pain were 6.3 (P=0.004), 2.0 (P=0.155), -0.04 (P=0.625) and - 1.0 (P<0.001), respectively. In patients who underwent TSA, the mean differences between actual and recalled ASES, SANE, SST and VAS pain were 4.5 (P =0.038), -3.9 (P=0.262), -1.2 (P=0.001) and -1.5 (P<0.001), respectively. ASES, SST, and VAS show moderate reliability, and SANE reliability was weak in both RCR and TSA populations. Patients had a tendency to recall higher pain scores than actual preoperative pain scores. In patients who underwent RCR or TSA, there was too much variability between individual patient's ability to accurately recall preoperative pain and function to reliably use recall data for research purposes.