Preoperative Chemotherapy Group Research Articles

How to determine the course of preoperative chemotherapy for spinal tuberculosis: A single-center clinical study.

This study aims to explore the clinical efficacy and feasibility of preoperative 1-week chemotherapy for patients with spinal tuberculosis (STB) undergoing complete lesion removal. Clinical data of 76 patients with STB who underwent complete focal debridement in our hospital were collected from June 2020 to September 2023. The patients were divided into 38 cases of preoperative 1-week chemotherapy group (Group A) according to the length of preoperative chemotherapy, and 38 cases of preoperative 2 to 4-week chemotherapy group (Group B). Perioperative related, imaging, and laboratory examination indices as well as postoperative neurological function recovery, postoperative pain recovery, related complications, and clinical efficacy were analyzed to compare the clinical efficacy of the 2 groups. All patients successfully completed the treatment of stage I complete lesion removal combined with bone grafting fusion and internal fixation. The difference in erythrocyte setting rate and C-reactive protein at the same postoperative observation time between the 2 groups was not statistically significant (P > .05). The visual analogue scale scores of patients in the 2 groups decreased significantly with prolonged time, and the difference was statistically significant (P < .05). All patients achieved satisfactory clinical efficacy (P < .05). All patients achieved good clinical outcomes, the difference between the groups was not statistically significant (P > .05). The difference in incision healing rate at 3 months postoperatively and bone graft fusion rate at 6 months postoperatively was not statistically significant between the 2 groups (P > .05). The dissemination and recurrence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis were not statistically significantly different between the 2 groups after surgery (P > .05). In summary, with complete lesion clearance, 1 week of preoperative chemotherapy is feasible in patients with STB with varying degrees of neurological dysfunction.

Feasibility of major hepatectomy following preoperative chemotherapy for advanced perihilar cholangiocarcinoma

BackgroundThe safety of major hepatectomy following preoperative chemotherapy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHCC) is underexplored. This study evaluates the impact of preoperative chemotherapy on surgical outcomes and assesses chemotherapy-induced liver injury in patients with advanced PHCC. MethodsThis retrospective study included 62 PHCC patients who underwent surgery between January 2019 and January 2024. Patients were divided into an upfront surgery group (UFS, n = 31) and a preoperative chemotherapy group (POC, n = 31). Preoperative chemotherapy was indicated when R0/R1 resection was unachievable, complex surgery was needed, or future liver reserve was insufficient. Baseline characteristics, surgical procedures, postoperative complications, and pathological findings were compared. ResultsPostoperative complications were comparable between groups, with Clavien-Dindo grade ≥3a rates of 30.7 % in the POC group and 24.3 % in the UFS group. Despite longer operative times and hospital stays in the POC group, no significant differences in hepatotoxicity or pathological findings, including Kleiner and Rubbia-Brandt scores, were observed. Notably, a pathological complete response was achieved in 12.9 % of the POC group. ConclusionMajor hepatectomy following preoperative chemotherapy for PHCC is safe and does not increase the risk of postoperative complications or hepatotoxicity. Further studies are warranted to refine resectability criteria and optimize patient selection.

Effect of preoperative immune checkpoint inhibitors on reducing residual lymph node metastases in patients with gastric cancer: a retrospective study

Objective: To investigate the effect of immune checkpoint inhibitors on reducing residual lymph node metastasis in patients with gastric cancer. Methods: The cohort of this retrospective study comprised patients from Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical University and the First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University who had undergone systemic treatment prior to gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy and had achieved Grade 1 primary tumor regression (TRG1) from January 2014 to December 2023. After exclusion of patients who had undergone preoperative radiotherapy, data of 58 patients (Nanfang Hospital: 46; First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University: 12) were analyzed. These patients were allocated to preoperative chemotherapy (Chemotherapy group, N=36 cases) and preoperative immunotherapy plus chemotherapy groups (Immunotherapy group, N=22 cases). There were no significant differences between these groups in sex, age, body mass index, diabetes, tumor location, pathological type, Lauren classification, tumor differentiation, pretreatment depth of invasion by primary tumor, pretreatment lymph node stage, pretreatment clinical stage, mismatch repair protein status, number of preoperative treatment cycles, or duration of preoperative treatment (all P>0.05). The primary outcome measure was postoperative lymph node downstaging. Secondary outcomes included postoperative depth of invasion by tumor, number of lymph nodes examined, and factors affecting residual lymph node metastasis status. Results: Lymph node downstaging was achieved significantly more often in the Immunotherapy group than the Chemotherapy group (pN0: 90.9% [20/22] vs. 61.1% [22/36]; pN1: 4.5% [1/22] vs. 36.1% [13/36]; pN2: 4.5% [1/22) vs. 0; pN3: 0 vs. 2.8% [1/36], Z=-2.315, P=0.021). There were no significant difference between the two groups in number of lymph nodes examined (40.5±16.3 vs. 40.8±17.5, t=0.076, P=0.940) or postoperative depth of invasion by primary tumor (pT1a: 50.0% [11/22] vs. 30.6% [11/36]; pT1b: 13.6% [3/22] vs. 19.4% [7/36]; pT2: 13.6% [3/22] vs. 13.9% [5/36]; pT3: 13.6% [3/22] vs. 25.0% [9/36]; pT4a: 9.1% [2/22] vs. 11.1% [4/36], Z=-1.331, P=0.183). Univariate analysis revealed that both preoperative treatment regimens were associated with residual lymph node metastasis status in patients whose primary tumor regression was TRG1 (χ2=6.070, P=0.014). Multivariate analysis incorporated the following factors: pretreatment depth of invasion by primary tumor, pretreatment lymph node stage, pretreatment clinical stage, number of preoperative treatment cycles, and preoperative treatment duration. We found that a combination of immunotherapy and chemotherapy administered preoperatively was an independent protective factor for reducing residual lymph node metastases in study patients whose primary tumor regression was TRG1 (OR=0.147, 95%CI: 0.026-0.828, P=0.030). Conclusion: Compared with preoperative chemotherapy alone, a combination of preoperative immunotherapy and chemotherapy achieved greater reduction of residual lymph node metastases in the study patients who achieved TRG1 tumor regression in their primary lesions.

Differential clinical outcomes after 3 versus 5 years in a comparison of preoperative chemotherapy with and without radiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: A national cohort propensity score-matched study

BackgroundPreoperative chemotherapy alone might be a good alternative to preoperative chemoradiotherapy for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, yet long-term real-world data from the same cohort are lacking. MethodsPatients diagnosed with stage II-III rectal adenocarcinoma from 2011 to 2015 were randomly sampled from the SEER-Plus database to evaluate the superiority of preoperative chemoradiotherapy versus preoperative chemotherapy alone. FindingsA total of 1314 eligible patients were enrolled, with a median follow-up of 74.0 months. At 3-year follow-up, neither overall survival (OS) nor cancer-specific survival (CSS) was significantly different between the two treatment groups. At 5-year follow-up, CSS was similar across groups (HR 0.768, 95% CI 0.532–1.108; P = 0.156), but the 5-year OS was significantly better in the preoperative chemoradiotherapy group than in the preoperative chemotherapy group (HR 0.682, 95% CI 0.538–0.866; P = 0.002). Besides, the landmark analysis indicated a direct contrast in the CSS within 3 years (HR 1.101, 95% CI 0.598–2.029; P = 0.756) versus that at 3–5 years (HR 0.597, 95% CI 0.377–0.948; P = 0.027). The landmark analysis also showed directly contrasting OS outcomes within 3 years (HR 0.761, 95% CI 0.533–1.086; P = 0.130) versus those at 3–5 years (HR 0.621, 95% CI 0.451–0.857; P = 0.003). InterpretationIn patients with locally advanced rectal cancer under real-world treatment practices, the addition of preoperative radiotherapy to chemotherapy improves survival outcomes at 3–5 years’ follow-up but not at 3-year follow-up.

Immature stroma and high infiltration of CD15+ cells are predictive markers of poor prognosis in different subsets of patients with pancreatic cancer.

Preoperative treatment is commonly carried out for borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). However, the relationship between the combination of immune cells in the tumor microenvironment and their intratumoral heterogeneity along with their association with histological findings remains unclear, especially in patients receiving preoperative chemotherapy. We aimed to explore the therapeutic strategies for patients with PDAC with poor prognosis after receiving chemotherapy based on histological and immunological microenvironmental classifications. We investigated the correlation between the prognosis and histological immune microenvironmental factors of patients who initially underwent surgery (n = 100) and were receiving gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GEM + nabPTX) as preoperative chemotherapy (n = 103). Immune profiles were generated based on immune cell infiltration into the tumor, and their correlation with patient outcomes and histological features was analyzed. Tumor-infiltrating neutrophils (TINs) were identified as independent poor prognostic factors using multivariate analysis in both surgery-first and preoperative chemotherapy groups. The patients were further classified into four groups based on immune cell infiltration into the tumor. Patients with high CD15 infiltration into the tumor and immature stroma at the cancer margins showed the worst prognosis in the preoperative chemotherapy group. The analysis of mRNA expression and immunohistochemical features revealed that CXCR2, the receptor for CXCL8, was correlated with disease-free and overall survival. We inferred that patients with immature stroma at the margins and high infiltration of CD15+ neutrophils within the tumor showed the worst prognosis and they could particularly benefit from treatment with inhibitors targeting CXCR2 or CXCL8.

Dynamics of the prognostic nutritional index in preoperative chemotherapy in patients with colorectal liver metastases

BackgroundIdentifying the prognostic indicators that reflect the efficacy of preoperative chemotherapy is necessary. In this study, we investigated the prognostic indicators targeting the systemic inflammatory response for the administration of preoperative chemotherapy in patients with colorectal liver metastases. MethodsData for 192 patients were retrospectively analyzed. The relationship between overall survival and clinicopathological variables, including biomarkers such as the prognostic nutritional index, was investigated in patients who underwent upfront surgery or preoperative chemotherapy. ResultsIn the upfront surgery group, extrahepatic lesion (p=0.01) and low prognostic nutritional index (p < 0.01) were significant prognostic indicators, whereas a decrease in the prognostic nutritional index (p=0.01) during preoperative chemotherapy were independent poor prognostic factors in the preoperative chemotherapy group. In particular, a decrease in the prognostic nutritional index was a significant prognostic marker in patients aged <75 years (p=0.04). In patients with a low prognostic nutritional index aged <75 years, preoperative chemotherapy significantly prolonged overall survival (p=0.02). ConclusionA decrease in the prognostic nutritional index during preoperative chemotherapy predicted overall survival of patients with colorectal liver metastases after hepatic resection, and preoperative chemotherapy may be effective for patients aged <75 years with a low prognostic nutritional index.

Treatment of bilateral Wilms’ tumor in children: how to improve the application of nephron-sparing surgery

To summarize the experience of nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) for bilateral Wilms tumors (BWT) in children. This study included children with BWT admitted to our hospital between January 2008 and June 2022. The details of the treatments and outcomes were analyzed. In all, 70 patients (39 males and 31 females) were enrolled, including 66 patients with synchronous tumors and 4 patients with metachronous tumors. The median age at diagnosis was 13 (3-75) months. Overall, 59 patients received preoperative chemotherapy and 45.8% (54/118) of the 118 sides of WT achieved a partial response (PR). Of the 70 patients, 48 (68.6%) underwent bilateral NSS and 22 (31.4%) underwent unilateral NSS and contralateral total nephrectomy. The proportion of bilateral NSS in the preoperative chemotherapy group was significantly higher than in the non-chemotherapy group (P = 0.031). Additionally, there were 26, 25, 14, and 5 cases of stage I, stage II, stage III, and stage IV, respectively. Among the 70 children, 16 had a recurrence, and 8 died. The 4years EFS and OS were 67.9% and 89.3%, respectively. The long-term survival rates of patients with BWT improved. Hence, preoperative chemotherapy should be administered to enhance the use of NSS in BWT.

PREOPERATIVE CHEMOTHERAPY VERSUS UPFRONT SURGERY FOR ADVANCED GASTRIC CANCER: A PROPENSITY SCORE MATCHING ANALYSIS.

Surgical resection remains the main curative therapeutic modality for advanced gastric cancer. Recently, the association of preoperative chemotherapy has allowed the improvement of results without increasing surgical complications. To evaluate the surgical and oncological outcomes of preoperative chemotherapy in a real-world setting. A retrospective review of gastric cancer patients who underwent gastrectomy was performed. Patients were divided into two groups for analysis: upfront surgery and preoperative chemotherapy. The propensity score matching analysis, including 9 variables, was applied to adjust for potential confounding factors. Of the 536 patients included, 112 (20.9%) were referred for preoperative chemotherapy. Before the propensity score matching analysis, the groups were different in terms of age, hemoglobin level, node metastasis at clinical stage- status, and extent of gastrectomy. After the analysis, 112 patients were stratified for each group. Both were similar for all variables assigned in the score. Patients in the preoperative chemotherapy group had less advanced postoperative p staging (p=0.010), postoperative n staging (p<0.001), and pTNM stage (p<0.001). Postoperative complications, 30- and 90-days mortality were similar between both groups. Before the propensity score matching analysis, there was no difference in survival between the groups. After the analysis, patients in the preoperative chemotherapy group had better overall survival compared to upfront surgery group (p=0.012). Multivariate analyses demonstrated that American Society of Anesthesiologists III/IV category and the presence of lymph node metastasis were factors significantly associated with worse overall survival. Preoperative chemotherapy was associated with increased survival in gastric cancer. There was no difference in the postoperative complication rate and mortality compared to upfront surgery.

Safety and short-term outcomes of gastrectomy after preoperative chemotherapy plus immunotherapy versus preoperative chemotherapy: a retrospective cohort study

BackgroundThe safety and short-term outcomes of gastrectomy after preoperative chemotherapy plus immunotherapy (PCIT) versus preoperative chemotherapy (PCT) in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC) remain unclear. This study was conducted to compare the safety and short-term efficacy of PCIT with those of PCT in patients with AGC.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the data of patients with AGC who received PCIT or PCT at Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute Gastrointestinal Cancer Center I between January 2019 and June 2021. The clinical characteristics were recorded, and short-term oncological outcomes were compared. Independent t tests, Mann‒Whitney U tests, chi-square tests, and Fisher’s exact tests were used to calculate differences. The correlation analyses were performed using Pearson correlation. All p values were two-sided, and a p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All the above statistical analyses were conducted by the SPSS version 24.0 software package (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).ResultsA total of 162 AGC patients were included in this study, including 25 patients who received PCIT and 137 patients who received PCT. There were no significant differences in preoperative treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) between the PCIT group and the PCT group (p = 0.088). Compared with the PCT group, the PCIT group had comparable postoperative functional recovery, with no significant differences in terms of time to first aerofluxus (p = 0.349), time to first defecation (p = 0.800), time to liquid diet (p = 0.233), or length of stay (p = 0.278). No significant differences were observed in terms of postoperative complications (p = 0.952), postoperative pain intensity at 24, 48, or 72 h (p = 0.375, p = 0.601, and p = 0.821, respectively), or postoperative supplementary analgesic use between the two groups (p = 0.881). In addition, the postoperative complication rate was 33.3% following laparoscopic approaches and 31.2% following open approaches in the PCIT group, with no significant difference (p = 1.000).ConclusionIn patients with AGC, gastrectomy with D2 or D2 + lymphadenectomy after PCIT had comparable short-term oncological outcomes to PCT.

Validation study of the JSHBPS nomogram for patients with colorectal liver metastases who underwent hepatic resection in the recent era - a nationwide survey in Japan.

The Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery (JSHBPS) nomogram was developed to predict disease-free survival in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) undergoing upfront hepatectomy. However, the utility of the nomogram in patients with resected CRLM remains unknown in the current situation in which treatment strategies are changing with advances in drugs. Patients in the initial nomogram cohort (n=727) and validation cohort (n=2225) were divided into the upfront hepatectomy and preoperative chemotherapy groups. The nomogram was validated by measuring calibration and discrimination in the two cohorts. Calibration curves were plotted, and survival probabilities were compared. Finally, to quantify the discrimination power, we estimated the concordance index (C-index). In the upfront hepatectomy group, the C-index was 0.63, the suitable cutoff value of the Beppu score was 7, and adjuvant chemotherapy was significantly effective limited to high-risk patients (Beppu score ≥7). The C-index was 0.56 in the preoperative chemotherapy group. The JSHBPS nomogram remains beneficial for patients undergoing upfront hepatectomy in the recent era but is less effective for patients undergoing hepatectomy after chemotherapy. Patients with a Beppu score ≥7 showed high-risk recurrence, and adjuvant chemotherapy should be recommended for these patients.

Preoperative Chemoradiation versus Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Resectable Esophageal Cancer: A Retrospective Study

AbstractPreoperative chemotherapy and preoperative chemoradiation, both improve survival for locally advanced esophageal cancer proven in randomized trials and metanalysis. Limited data are available comparing these preoperative therapies especially in non-gastroesophageal junction squamous cell cancer of esophagus. In this retrospective analysis, 69 eligible patients of locally advanced esophageal cancer, who underwent preoperative chemoradiation followed by surgery or chemotherapy followed by surgery at our center were analyzed. The end points of study were overall survival, disease free survival, and histopathological response. Three weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin was used as neoadjuvant chemotherapy and weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin were used with radiation as per standard protocol. Median follow-up time was 35 months for surviving patients. Median overall survival was 44 months (95% CI 27.2–62.7) in chemoradiation group and it was not reached in the chemotherapy arm (p-value −0.832). The median disease-free survival for patients who underwent preoperative chemoradiation was 41 months and 34 months in preoperative chemotherapy group (p-value −0.812). Seven of 41 patients (17.1%) in chemoradiation group were circumferential resection margin (CRM) positive as compared with six of 28 (21.4%) in chemotherapy group (p = 0.650). A pathological complete response was seen in 13 (31.7%) patients in chemoradiation group and seven (21.4) patients in chemotherapy group. There was no survival advantage for preoperative chemoradiotherapy compared with preoperative chemotherapy in patients with predominant esophageal squamous cell carcinoma of locally advanced esophageal cancer. Despite the non-significant improvement from preoperative chemoradiation with respect to CRM positivity and pathological complete response rates, there was no difference in overall survival or disease-free survival.

Prognostic Analysis of Distal Pancreatectomy for Pancreatic Body and/or Tail Cancer Involving the Portal Vein: Is Pancreatic Body and/or Tail Cancer Involving the Portal Vein Resectable?

To the best of our knowledge, the prognostic impact of distal pancreatectomy (DP) for pancreatic body and/or tail cancer involving portal vein (PV) has not been analyzed. A total of 155 patients with pancreatic body and/or tail cancer who were eligible candidates for resection between 2002 and 2017 were analyzed. Twenty-seven patients had PV contact ≤180°. Fifteen patients underwent preoperative treatment; finally, 132 patients underwent DP, and 21 underwent DP with celiac axis resection. The overall survival (OS) of the PV contact group (n = 27, median survival time [MST], 25.6 months) was worse than the non-PV contact group (n = 128; MST, 58.4 months; P = 0.002); however, it was better than the unresectable group (MST, 14.2 months; P = 0.011). The OS of the PV contact with preoperative chemotherapy group (MST, not available) was comparable to the non-PV contact group and better than the PV contact without preoperative chemotherapy group (MST, 13.4 months; P = 0.017). The multivariate analysis identified PV contact ( P = 0.046) as one of the independent prognostic factors of OS. Pancreatic body and/or tail cancer contact with PV ≤180° should be considered borderline resectable because of poor survival.

Post-operative anastomotic leakage and collagen changes in patients with rectal cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy vs chemoradiotherapy

A significant difference in the anastomotic leakage (AL) rate has been observed between patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who have undergone preoperative chemotherapy and those undergoing preoperative chemoradiotherapy. This study aimed to quantitatively analyse collagen structural changes caused by preoperative chemoradiotherapy and illuminate the relationship between collagen changes and AL. Anastomotic distal and proximal "doughnut" specimens from the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University (Guangzhou, China) were quantitatively assessed for collagen structural changes between patients with and without preoperative radiotherapy using multiphoton imaging. Then, patients treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy were used as a training cohort to construct an AL-SVM classifier by the Mann-Whitney U test and support vector machine (SVM). An independent test cohort from the Fujian Province Cancer Hospital (Fuzhou, China) was used to validate the AL-SVM classifier. A total of 207 patients were included from the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University. The AL rate in the preoperative chemoradiotherapy group (n = 107) was significantly higher than that in the preoperative chemotherapy group (n = 100) (21.5% vs 7.0%, P = 0.003). A fully quantitative analysis showed notable morphological and spatial distribution feature changes in collagen in the preoperative chemoradiotherapy group. Then, the patients who received preoperative chemoradiotherapy were used as a training cohort to construct the AL-SVM classifier based on five collagen features and the tumor distance from the anus. The AL-SVM classifier showed satisfactory discrimination and calibration with areas under the curve of 0.907 and 0.856 in the training and test cohorts, respectively. The collagen structure may be notably altered by preoperative radiotherapy. The AL-SVM classifier was useful for the individualized prediction of AL in rectal cancer patients undergoing preoperative chemoradiotherapy.

Limited Prognostic Value of KRAS in Patients Undergoing Hepatectomy for Colorectal Liver Metastases

RAS mutation status is considered a powerful prognostic factor in patients undergoing hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases (CLM). However, whether its prognostic power is robust regardless of administration of preoperative chemotherapy or tumor burden remains unclear. Consecutive patients who underwent initial hepatectomy for CLM from April 2010 through March 2017 in two hospitals were included. The prognostic value of KRAS was compared based on whether patients received preoperative chemotherapy and their tumor burden score (TBS). We included 409 patients (median follow-up 38 months). In the preoperative chemotherapy group, patients with mutant KRAS (mt-KRAS) CLM had poorer overall survival (OS) than those with wild KRAS (wt-KRAS; 5-year OS: 37.7% vs 53.8%, p = 0.024), although their OS was not different from patients undergoing upfront surgery. Similarly, patients with mt-KRAS had poorer OS than those with wt-KRAS in TBS of 3-9 (5-year OS: 33.1% vs 63.2%, p = 0.001), although their OS was not different from patients with TBS < 3 or ≥ 9. In multivariate analysis, mt-KRAS was an independent prognostic factor of OS among patients receiving preoperative chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR] 1.61, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.034-2.491; p = 0.035) and patients with TBS of 3-9 (HR 1.836, 95% CI 1.176-2.866; p = 0.008). However, it was not a prognostic factor in patients who underwent upfront surgery or with TBS > 3 or ≥ 9. In patients undergoing hepatectomy for CLM, the prognostic value of KRAS depends on their history of preoperative chemotherapy or tumor burden.

Real-World Effectiveness and Prognostic Factors Analysis of Stages I-III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Following Neoadjuvant Chemo-Immunotherapy or Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

Purpose: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been successfully used in many clinical trials related to immunotherapy. This study aimed to investigate the clinical efficacy of ICIs and prognostic factors in patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) following neoadjuvant therapy in the real world.Methods: A total of 170 consecutive patients were finally selected and divided into two groups: the preoperative chemotherapy group (n = 91) and the chemo-immunotherapy group (n = 79). The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS). The secondary endpoints were pathological response, clinical response, pathological nodal disease, and ability of multivariate Cox regression analysis to predict survival. Survival was estimated using Kaplan–Meier method and compared using log-rank test.Results: There was a statistically significant difference in DFS between the two groups (log-rank test, P = 0.019). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that maximum tumor diameter (P = 0.016), higher lymph node stage (ypN1, P = 0.016; ypN2, P <0.001), and major pathological response not achieved (non-major pathological response [MPR], P = 0.011) were independent prognostic factors for worse DFS.Conclusion: Neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy yields better effects in pathological and clinical response than chemotherapy alone, which is also associated with longer DFS in the treatment of locally advanced NSCLC. Moreover, a larger tumor specimen diameter, higher ypN staging, and non-MPR after neoadjuvant therapy were associated with worse prognosis.

Comparison of preoperative chemotherapy with concurrent chemoradiotherapy combined with TME for 305 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer

Objective: To retrospectively analyze the long-term efficacy and prognostic factors of preoperative chemotherapy (PCT) or chemoradiotherapy (PCRT) combined with total mesorectal excision in locally advanced rectal cancer. Methods: Clinical pathology data of 305 patients with localized advanced rectal cancer admitted to the Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences from 2006 to 2018 were collected, of whom 246 patients received PCRT (PCRT group), 59 patients received PCT (PCT group). Kaplan-Meier and Log rank test were used for the survival analysis, Cox regression model was used for multivariate analysis, and the prognosis of two groups of patients were compared by the propensity score matching (PSM). Results: In the whole group of 305 patients, 20 cases of tumors located in the upper part of the rectum and at the junction of rectum and colon, 96 cases in the middle of the rectum and 189 cases in the lower part of the rectum. PCRT group included 38 cases of cT2-3 phase, 11 cases of cT4a stage, 10 cases of cT4b stage, while the cases in PCT group were 184, 0 and 62 cases, respectively, the difference is statistically significant (P<0.05). The R0 excision rates of PCRT group and PCT group were 100% (246/246) and 96.6% (57/59), respectively, and the total pathological remission rates were 13.4% and 3.3%, respectively (P<0.05). After PSM, the 3-year survival rates of PCRT group and the PCT group were 86.6% and 89.9% (P>0.05), respectively, and the progression-free survival rates were 74.6% and 77.2% (P>0.05), local recurring free survival rates were 100% and 92.3% (P>0.05), distant metastasis free survival rate were 75.6% and 77.3% (P>0.05). Pre-treatment N-positive, N-degeneration and MRF-positive were all associated with total survival (P<0.05). Conclusion: In the PCRT group, with a higher proportion of patients with stage T4b and lower rectal cancer, the long-term efficacy of PCRT was similar to that of PCT, and higher R0 excision rate and pathological complete response rate could be obtained.

Preoperative Chemotherapy for Limited-stage Small Cell Carcinoma of the Esophagus

BackgroundThe optimal treatment approach for limited-stage small cell carcinoma of the esophagus remains uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of preoperative chemotherapy in combination with surgery vs upfront surgery in those patients. MethodsFrom June 2001 to June 2015, a total of 280 patients with limited-stage small cell carcinoma of the esophagus were screened from 60 131 patients with esophageal cancer. Outcome analysis of those patients who underwent preoperative chemotherapy in combination with surgery or upfront surgery was conducted. The primary end point was overall survival, and secondary end points included progression-free survival and safety. ResultsOf the 280 patients, 200 were men (71.4%), the median age was 64 years (range, 42-75 years), 171 patients (61.1%) patients had preoperative chemotherapy in combination with surgery, and 109 patients (38.9%) underwent upfront surgery. A pathologic complete response rate of 8.8% was noted in patients who received preoperative chemotherapy. Compared with the upfront surgery group, the preoperative chemotherapy group had a better median overall survival (26.0 months vs 19.5 months, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.92; P = .011) and a prolonged progression-free survival (16.0 months vs 13.0 months, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.57 to 0.99; P = .039). Postoperative complications and peritreatment mortality were comparable between both groups. ConclusionsCompared with upfront surgery, preoperative chemotherapy in combination with surgery improves overall survival in patients with limited-stage small cell carcinoma of the esophagus.

Perioperative Outcomes and Survival After Preoperative Immunotherapy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

BackgroundAlthough preoperative immunotherapy is increasingly utilized for non-small cell lung cancer, there remains a paucity of robust clinical data on its safety and long-term survival. Our objective was to evaluate the perioperative outcomes and survival associated with immunotherapy followed by surgery for patients with non-small cell lung cancer. MethodsOutcomes of patients with non-small cell lung cancer who underwent lung resection after preoperative chemotherapy with or without radiation or immunotherapy (with or without chemotherapy or chemoradiation) in the National Cancer Database (2010 to 2017) were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier analysis, multivariable logistic regression, multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis, and propensity score-matched analysis. ResultsFrom 2010 to 2017, 236 patients (2.2%) received immunotherapy and 10 715 patients received preoperative chemotherapy followed by surgery. There were no significant differences between the immunotherapy and preoperative chemotherapy groups with regard to margin positivity (8.5% [n = 20] vs 7.5% [n = 715], P = .98), 30-day readmission (4.2% [n = 10] vs 4.1% [n = 440], P = .87), and 30-day mortality (0.4% [n = 1] vs 2.4% [n = 253], P = .25). The immunotherapy and preoperative chemotherapy groups had similar overall survival (5-year survival 63% [95% confidence interval, 50% to 74%] vs 51% [95% confidence interval, 50% to 52%], log rank P = .06; multivariable adjusted hazard ratio 0.98; 95% confidence interval, 0.67 to 1.41; P = .90). A propensity score matched analysis of 344 patients, well matched by preoperative characteristics, showed no significant differences in short-term outcomes and overall survival (log rank P = 1.00) between the two groups. ConclusionsIn this national analysis, preoperative immunotherapy followed by surgery for non-small cell lung cancer was found to be safe and feasible with similar short-term outcomes and overall survival when compared with preoperative chemotherapy followed by surgery.

Survival Outcomes in Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for High-grade Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Nationally Representative Analysis

ObjectiveTo assess the impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) on survival outcomes in a contemporary cohort of patients with in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). MethodsThe National Cancer Database was queried from 2004 to 2015 to identify subjects who underwent nephroureterectomy for UTUC. Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank test was performed to compare all-cause mortality between patients who received preoperative chemotherapy to those who did not at each pathologic (p) TNM stage group: T1-4N0, N+, and M+ disease. Associations for all-cause mortality were identified using an adjusted Cox regression analysis. ResultsA total of 10,315 chemoeligible subjects were included in the analysis. A total of 296 (2.9%) of patients received NAC prior to NU. Kaplan-Meier survival curves of the entire cohort demonstrated an overall survival advantage associated with administration of NAC (P = .017). Stratified by clinical staging, subjects with nonorgan-confined tumors had improved overall survival outcomes with NAC administration (P = .012). On multivariate analysis there was a statistically significant improvement in overall survival between in patients who received NAC. Of patients in the preoperative chemotherapy group who had clinically nonorgan-confined disease, 27.1% had organ-confined disease at time of surgery compared to 1.4% of those who underwent surgery as initial therapy. ConclusionIn a contemporary cohort of subjects who underwent nephroureterectomy for UTUC, administration of NAC in patients with high-grade nonorgan-confined disease led to higher rates of pathologic downstaging and was associated with improved overall survival.

Survival Advantages in Gastric Cancer Patients Receiving Preoperative SOX Regimen Chemotherapy.

Objective: This study addressed whether preoperative chemotherapy (PECT) plus surgery prolongs overall survival (OS) compared with surgery plus postoperative chemotherapy (POCT) among gastric cancer (GC) patients in Northwest China. Materials and Methods: The authors included 157 GC patients confirmed histologically or by gastroscopic pathological examination treated at the General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University of China between 2012 and 2018. All patients were followed up by telephone in January 2019 within a 2-week period. The endpoint was death due to GC or its complications. Results: Thirty-eight patients received PECT, 41 patients received POCT, 40 patients received surgery alone, and 38 patients received chemotherapy alone. Surgery was performed with R0 resection and subsequent extended lymph node dissection. Chemotherapy was performed with the S-1, oxaliplatin capecitabine regimen. Patients who received PECT had longer OS than those with POCT treatment (hazard ratio = 2.409, p = 0.037). The 5-year OS rate was 32.7% higher in the PECT group than in the POCT group. Conclusions: PECT was associated with better OS in GC patients and should be considered by clinicians in GC treatment, although prospective studies are needed for confirmation.