Prehospital Triage Research Articles

Bayesian modeling framework for optimizing pre-hospital stroke triage decisions

Ischemic stroke is responsible for significant morbidity and mortality in the United States and worldwide. Stroke treatment optimization requires emergency medical personnel to make rapid triage decisions concerning destination hospitals that may differ in their ability to provide highly time-sensitive pharmaceutical and surgical interventions. These decisions are particularly crucial in rural areas, where transport decisions can have a large impact on treatment times – often involving a trade-off between delay in pharmaceutical therapy or a delay in endovascular thrombectomy. In this work, we explore a Bayesian modeling framework to address this decision-making process, showing how these techniques may be used to fully account for diagnostic and therapeutic uncertainty. We demonstrate how these techniques can contextualize triage decision at a fine-grained spatial scale. We further show the application of this modeling approach in the US State of Iowa, using data from the Virtual International Stroke Trials Archive (VISTA), and describe potential next steps for improved triage. ABBREVIATION LVO: large vessel occlusion; non-LVO, non-large vessel occlusion; IVT: intravenous tissue plasminogen activator; EVT: endovascular thrombectomy; CSC: comprehensive stroke centers; PSC: primary stroke centers; DS: drip and ship; MS, mothership; EMS: Emergency Medical Service; BGLM: Bayesian Generalized Linear Model; BGAM: Bayesian Generalized Additive Model; BART: Bayesian Additive Regression Trees; VISTA: Virtual International Stroke Trials Archive; NIHSS: National Institute of Health Stroke Severity Scale; ASPECTS: Alberta Stroke Programme Early CT Score; mRS, modified Rankin score; ROCAUC: Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; ELPD: Expected Log pointwise Predictive Density; SE: Standard Error; ICA: Internal Carotid Artery; M1: Middle Cerebral Artery segment 1; M2: Middle Cerebral Artery segment 2; TIA: Transient Ischemic Attack; Cr-I: Credible Intervals; LKW: Last Known Well

Field trauma triage criteria associated with need for dedicated trauma center care: a single-center retrospective cohort study.

Direct transport from the scene of injury to a trauma centre reduces saves lives. In Ontario,paramedics use the field trauma triage standard (FTTS) to determine if a patient meets trauma bypass criteria. Recent studies have questioned the efficacy of the FTTS in identifying severely injured patients. The objective of this study was to determine the predictive performance of the FTTS on the need for trauma center care in patients who were transported to a trauma center. This was a single-center health records study of patients transported by ambulance directly to a level 1 trauma center. Hospital based trauma center need and injury severity score-based needwere defined. Bivariate associations with one or more FTTS criteria were tested using the Wilcoxon two-sample test for continuous variables, and the Chi-square or Fisher's exact test for categorical indicators. The sensitivity and specificity of each category of the FTTS were calculated. There were 1427 patients included in the study, with76% men, mean age of 40, and 76% had a blunt mechanism. The overall sensitivity and specificity of the FTTS was 90.9% and 20.8% for hospital-based needand 91.6% and 20.3 for injury severity need. The most sensitive variable for hospital-based need was physiologic criteria (53.7).Mechanism of injury was the most sensitive criteria for injury severity need(54.8). Physiological criteria had the highest association with hospital-based and injury severity need (adjusted odds ratios 7.5[95% CI 5.8-9.8] and 5.1[95% CI 3.9-6.7]). The FTTS has fair performance in identifying the need for hospital-based and injury severity need. Systolic blood pressure less than 90mmHg, Glasgow Coma Scale (motor) less than 6,and falls greater than 6m were most predictive of trauma center need. Improving prehospital trauma triage is critical to ensure timely transport to a trauma centre.

The accuracy of prehospital triage decisions in English trauma networks – a case-cohort study

BackgroundCare for injured patients in England is provided by inclusive regional trauma networks. Ambulance services use triage tools to identify patients with major trauma who would benefit from expedited Major Trauma Centre (MTC) care. However, there has been no investigation of triage performance, despite its role in ensuring effective and efficient MTC care. This study aimed to investigate the accuracy of prehospital major trauma triage in representative English trauma networks.MethodsA diagnostic case-cohort study was performed between November 2019 and February 2020 in 4 English regional trauma networks as part of the Major Trauma Triage Study (MATTS). Consecutive patients with acute injury presenting to participating ambulance services were included, together with all reference standard positive cases, and matched to data from the English national major trauma database. The index test was prehospital provider triage decision making, with a positive result defined as patient transport with a pre-alert call to the MTC. The primary reference standard was a consensus definition of serious injury that would benefit from expedited major trauma centre care. Secondary analyses explored different reference standards and compared theoretical triage tool accuracy to real-life triage decisions.ResultsThe complete-case case-cohort sample consisted of 2,757 patients, including 959 primary reference standard positive patients. The prevalence of major trauma meeting the primary reference standard definition was 3.1% (n=54/1,722, 95% CI 2.3 – 4.0). Observed prehospital provider triage decisions demonstrated overall sensitivity of 46.7% (n=446/959, 95% CI 43.5-49.9) and specificity of 94.5% (n=1,703/1,798, 95% CI 93.4-95.6) for the primary reference standard. There was a clear trend of decreasing sensitivity and increasing specificity from younger to older age groups. Prehospital provider triage decisions commonly differed from the theoretical triage tool result, with ambulance service clinician judgement resulting in higher specificity.ConclusionsPrehospital decision making for injured patients in English trauma networks demonstrated high specificity and low sensitivity, consistent with the targets for cost-effective triage defined in previous economic evaluations. Actual triage decisions differed from theoretical triage tool results, with a decreasing sensitivity and increasing specificity from younger to older ages.

Artificial intelligence to enhance prehospital stroke diagnosis and triage: a perspective.

As health systems organize to deliver the highest quality stroke care to their patients, there is increasing emphasis being placed on prehospital stroke recognition, accurate diagnosis, and efficient triage to improve outcomes after stroke. Emergency medical services (EMS) personnel currently rely heavily on dispatch accuracy, stroke screening tools, bypass protocols and prehospital notification to care for patients with suspected stroke, but novel tools including mobile stroke units and telemedicine-enabled ambulances are already changing the landscape of prehospital stroke care. Herein, the authors provide our perspective on the current state of prehospital stroke diagnosis and triage including several of these emerging trends. Then, we provide commentary to highlight potential artificial intelligence (AI) applications to improve stroke detection, improve accurate and timely dispatch, enhance EMS training and performance, and develop novel stroke diagnostic tools for prehospital use.

Tele-ICU Management of a Trauma Patient at a Peripheral Center

Methods: A 23-year-old male was admitted to a peripheral center following a fall from a tractor. Examination at admission revealed a conscious, stable patient with significant chest pain. The tele-ICU (intensive care unit) was called, and when they received the patient, he was stabilized and managed immediately. The tele-ICU connection was provided through the Command Center in Apollo Hospitals, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad, India, which is connected to multiple spoke locations at peripheral centers using audio-visual aids. An intensivist is available 24 h daily to provide critical care services to the peripheral centers through audio-visual aids. The tele-ICU connection is provided to the peripheral centers through commercial audio-visual and bedside data transfer devices. The tele-ICU team supervised the primary survey remotely via a central monitor, viewing the patient’s vitals along with the audio/video calling capabilities of the cameras as a part of the tele-ICU program. Results: Chest X-rays showed bilateral pneumothorax, lung compression, and multiple rib fractures. The team at the peripheral center was immediately advised to institute bilateral intercostal drainage (ICD). High-resolution CT chest (HRCT) reveals extensive right and minor left pneumothorax, bilateral lung contusions, a right clavicle medial end fracture, and multiple rib fractures. Ultrasonography of the abdomen showed altered splenic echo texture and moderate left pleural effusion. Flail chest and paradoxical breathing pattern warranted endotracheal intubation. The patient was ventilated for 4 days. On day 3, the patient experienced an air leak from the left ICD, increased drain output, and decreased hemoglobin. The tele-ICU team consulted the cardiothoracic surgeon regarding the air leak and followed their advice to attach a vacuum bottle to the ICD. The patient’s breathing improved gradually. Mechanical ventilator settings (i.e., tidal volume, respiratory rate, and peak airway pressures) were reviewed daily by the tele-ICU team during the regular morning and evening rounds. In addition, the ventilator and the bedside monitor were continuously monitored from the Command Center through video conferencing, which is integrated with electronic software and regularly captures the patient’s vitals. After 4 days of mechanical ventilation, the patient was extubated and started on oxygen therapy. Oxygen was gradually tapered and stopped. After 8 days of uneventful hospitalization, the patient was discharged. Conclusion: Studies show that telemedicine can provide expert-guided mentoring for life-saving procedures, including pre-hospital assessment and triage for polytrauma, tube thoracotomies, and extended focused assessment with sonography in trauma (eFAST). Technology may help resource-constrained places adopt telemedicine and its benefits.

Validation of motor component of Glasgow coma scale in lieu of total Glasgow coma scale as a pediatric trauma field triage tool

IntroductionPrehospital trauma triage and disability assessment of pediatric patients can be challenging on the field, especially in the pre-verbal age group. It would be useful if the same triage tool and criteria can be used for both adults and children to risk-stratify the need of higher acuity of trauma care. Study objectiveWe aimed to investigate if using only the motor component of Glasgow Coma Scale (mGCS), as a quick field trauma triage tool, was non-inferior to total GCS (tGCS), and if mGCS <6 was non-inferior to tGCS <14, in predicting the need for intensive care or mortality in the pediatric population. MethodsWe performed a retrospective review of patients <18-years-old, who presented to our emergency department (ED) with moderate (Injury Severity Score (ISS) 9–15) to severe (ISS > 15) traumatic injuries from January 2012 to December 2021. Using ED triage data, mortality and the need for intensive care unit (ICU) admission were used as surrogate outcomes to investigate if mGCS <6 was non-inferior to tGCS <14, and the area-under-the-receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUROC) was used as a measure of comparability. ResultsAmong 582 included for analysis, the median age was 7-years-old (2–12), and most were male (63.4%). 22.4% patients demised or required ICU care. mGCS <6 had an AUROC of 0.75 (95% CI 0.70 to 0.79), which was non-inferior to tGCS <14; AUROC 0.76, (95% CI 0.72 to 0.81), for identifying children requiring ICU management or demised. The results shown here were based on the AUROCs that were used to evaluate the discriminatory ability of tGCS <14 and mGCS <6 in prediction of mortality and the need for ICU care. ConclusionOur study showed that mGCS was significantly associated with tGCS, and was non- inferior to the latter as a triage tool in pediatric trauma. It validated the use of mGCS <6 in lieu of tGCS <14 in the pre-hospital field triage of pediatric patients, in identification of children at risk of death or requiring ICU care. Larger prospective, observational studies using on-scene data would be required for more robust validation and determine optimal cut-offs.

English

Background: For patients sustaining major trauma, decreasing time to definitive care remains a primary goal. Specialized trauma team involvement is essential for coordinating the emergency department care of complex major trauma patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate if the timing of trauma team involvement impacts length of stay and time to definitive care in the emergency department. Methods: This is a single-centre retrospective medical record review, including patients meeting Quebec pre-hospital triage criteria for major trauma from May 15, 2018 to December 31, 2020. We assessed time from patient arrival until departure from the resuscitation room, time to CT scan, time to disposition, and overall length of emergency department stay. Patients were grouped according to the timing of trauma team activation (TTA) as (1) pre-hospital notification, (2) on arrival in the emergency department, (3) receiving a trauma consult only, or (4) no trauma team involvement. Mean times and standard deviations were calculated, and group differences were assessed using the Kruskal-Wallis test and the independent sample Mann-Whitney U test. Results: We identified 371 patients meeting our inclusion criteria; there were no differences between groups in mean time spent in the resuscitation room based on the timing of trauma team involvement (45-51 minutes, p=0.422). A trauma team activation with pre-hospital notification was associated with a statistically significant shorter time to CT scan (62-81 minutes, p=0.010), time to disposition (6:37-13:41, p&lt;0.001), and total emergency department length of stay (9:22-23:16 hours: minutes, p&lt;0.001). Conclusion: Appropriate trauma team activation improves performance indicators used to evaluate the quality of care in the emergency department. This research suggests that pre-hospital trauma team activation should be considered the standard of care for all patients meeting pre-hospital field triage criteria for major trauma. Keywords: trauma, triage, pre-hospital, trauma team activation, trauma quality indicators

Clinical Implications of Over- and Under-Triage Using Need for Trauma Intervention and Cribari Indices.

Need for Trauma Intervention (NFTI) score was proposed to help identify injured trauma patients while minimizing under (UT) and over triage (OT). Using a national database, we aimed to describe UT and OT of NFTI vs standard Cribari method (CM) and hypothesized triage sensitivity remains poor. The 2021 Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) database was queried. Demographics, mechanism, verification level, interfacility transfer (IF), and level of activation were collected. Patients were stratified by both NFTI [+ vs -] and CM [Injury severity score (ISS) < 15 vs > 15]. UT was defined as NFTI + or ISS >15 without full trauma activation. 1,030,526 patients were identified in TQIP. 84,969 were UT and 97,262 were OT using NFTI while 94,020 were UT and 108,823 were OT using CM. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of NFTI is 49%, 89%, 45%, and 90%, respectively vs 43%, 87%, 39%, and 89% of CM, respectively. Age was higher in the UT group using both scores (52 vs 42, P < .0001 and 54 vs 42, P < .0001, respectively). Using MLR, level 2 and 3 verification, blunt mechanism, female, IF, and older age were associated with UT in both NFTI and CM. Level 1 verification, penetrating mechanism, male, no IF, and younger age were associated with OT. Current prehospital triage criteria have poor sensitivity for identifying severely injured trauma patients by both NFTI and CM. UT increases as age of the patient increases. Further studies are needed to improve triage.

Large vessel occlusive stroke with milder baseline severity shows better collaterals and reduced harm from thrombectomy transfer delays.

Patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke presenting with milder baseline clinical severity are common and require endovascular thrombectomy. However, such patients are difficult to recognize using pre-hospital severity-based triage tools and therefore are likely to require a secondary inter-hospital transfer if transported to a non-thrombectomy center. Given the potential for milder severity to represent better underlying cerebrovascular collateral circulation, it is unknown whether transfer delays are still associated with poorer post-stroke outcomes in this patient group. We primarily aimed to examine whether the harmful effect of inter-hospital transfer delay for thrombectomy was different for LVO patients with mild or severe deficits. Secondarily, we also investigated whether imaging markers of collateral circulation were different between severity groups. Registry data from two large Australian thrombectomy centers were used to identify all directly presenting and secondarily transferred LVO patients undergoing thrombectomy, divided into those with lower (NIHSS < 10) and higher (NIHSS ⩾ 10) baseline deficits. The primary outcome was the functional independence or return to baseline defined as modified Rankin Scale 0-2 or baseline at 90 days. Patients with complete baseline CT-perfusion data were analyzed for imaging markers of collateral circulation by baseline severity group. A total of 1210 LVO patients undergoing thrombectomy were included, of which 273 (22.6%) had lower baseline severity. Despite similar thrombolysis and recanalization rates, transferred patients had lower odds of achieving the primary outcome compared to the primary presentation to a thrombectomy center, where baseline severity was higher (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.759 (95% CI 0.576-0.999)), but not when severity was lower (aOR 1.357 (95% CI 0.764-2.409), p-interaction = 0.122). In the imaging analysis of 436 patients, those with milder severity showed smaller median ischemic core volumes (12.6 (IQR 0.0-17.9) vs 27.5 (IQR 6.5-37.1) mL, p < 0.001)), higher median perfusion mismatch ratio (10.8 (IQR 4.8-54.5) vs 6.6 (IQR 3.5-16.5), p < 0.001), and lower median hypoperfusion intensity ratio (0.25 (IQR 0.18-0.38) vs 0.40 (IQR 0.22-0.57), p < 0.001). Patients receiving secondary inter-hospital transfer for thrombectomy had poorer outcomes compared to those presenting directly to a thrombectomy center if baseline deficits were severe, but this difference was not observed when baseline deficits were milder. This result may potentially be due to our secondary findings of significantly improved collateral circulation markers in lower-severity LVO patients. As such, failure of pre-hospital screening tools to detect lower-severity LVO patients for pre-hospital bypass to a thrombectomy center may not necessarily deleteriously affect outcome. Anonymized data not published within this article will be made available on request from any qualified investigator.

Prehospital mass casualty incident triage simulation builds knowledge and confidence in medical trainees.

Mass casualty incident (MCI) triage simulation is an increasingly useful tool for teaching triage systems to medical students, trainees, and hospital staff. MCI simulation in the prehospital setting has not yet been studied in this population. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of a prehospital MCI simulation in medical students, residents, and fellows. Our primary outcome was knowledge of the components of the triage algorithms used in MCI response. Our secondary outcome was each participant's confidence level if required to assist with or lead a MCI response. This was an observational study with pre-post surveys. We recruited 30 medical students, 14 emergency medicine (EM) residents, and four pediatric EM fellows to fill out a survey before and after a 3-h simulation session practicing the START and JumpSTART algorithms on two prehospital MCI scenarios. Overall, all groups demonstrated significant improvement in knowledge of triage colors, information needed to assign a triage color, pediatric airway management during a MCI, and indications for breaths-first CPR. They also demonstrated significant increase in confidence both in assisting with and in leading a MCI response. Simulated practice triaging patients in prehospital MCI scenarios improves knowledge of triage algorithms and increases confidence in assisting with or leading a MCI response in medical trainees.

Evaluating Transport Strategies and Local Hospital Impact on Stroke Outcomes: A RACECAT Trial Substudy

Background The optimal strategy for transferring patients to specialized acute stroke care remains controversial. This substudy of the Effect of Direct Transportation to Thrombectomy‐Capable Center vs Local Stroke Center on Neurological Outcomes in Patients with suspected Large‐Vessel Occlusion Stroke in Nonurban Areas (RACECAT) trial aims to investigate the impact of local hospital characteristics and performance on the optimal transport strategy and stroke outcomes. Methods This was a secondary post hoc analysis of the RACECAT trial, evaluating factors potentially associated with functional outcomes among patients initially evaluated at a local stroke center (Local‐SC) versus a thrombectomy‐capable center. The primary outcome was the shift in the 90‐day modified Rankin Scale score in the target population of the RACECAT trial. Door‐to‐needle time, level of care of the Local‐SC (telestroke versus primary stroke center), the specialty of the physician involved with therapeutic decisions, and Local‐SC case volume were assessed for subgroup analyses. Results Of the 1367 patients included in the analysis, 903 had acute ischemic strokes (modified intention to treat). The 90‐day modified Rankin Scale score was associated with door‐to‐needle time in the entire modified intention‐to‐treat cohort ( P = 0.026) and in patients initially evaluated in a Local‐SC ( P = 0.063), and with local hospital level of care (telestroke versus primary stroke center; P = 0.10). There was a trend favoring direct transport to thrombectomy‐capable center for patients whose assigned Local‐SC was a telestroke center (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.47 [95% CI, 0.93–2.33] versus 0.94 [95% CI, 0.71–1.24]; P interaction = 0.08) or had door‐to‐needle time over the global median (adjusted OR, 1.52 [95% CI, 0.97–2.40] versus 0.94 [95% CI, 0.71–1.25]; P interaction = 0.06). In patients with confirmed large‐vessel occlusion, the benefit of direct transport to thrombectomy‐capable centers when the Local‐SC was a telestroke center ( P interaction = 0.04) or had longer door‐to‐needle time ( P interaction = 0.07) was more evident. Conclusions Direct transport to thrombectomy‐capable centers may be preferable in areas primarily covered by telestroke or Local‐SCs with poorer performance, especially in patients with large‐vessel occlusion. These findings can contribute to refining prehospital triage strategies and optimizing stroke systems of care.

Comparative Analysis of META and SALT Disaster Triage in an Adult Trauma Population: A Retrospective Observational Study.

Medical professionals can use mass-casualty triage systems to assist them in prioritizing patients from mass-casualty incidents (MCIs). Correct triaging of victims will increase their chances of survival. Determining the triage system that has the best performance has proven to be a difficult question to answer. The Advanced Prehospital Triage Model (Modelo Extrahospitalario de Triaje Avanzado; META) and Sort, Assess, Lifesaving Interventions, Treatment/Transport (SALT) algorithms are the most recent triage techniques to be published. The present study aimed to evaluate the META and SALT algorithms' performance and statistical agreement with various standards. The secondary objective was to determine whether these two MCI triage systems predicted patient outcomes, such as mortality, length-of-stay, and intensive care unit (ICU) admission. This retrospective study used patient data from the trauma registry of an American College of Surgeons Level 1 trauma center, from January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2020. The sensitivity, specificity, and statistical agreement of the META and SALT triage systems to various standards (Revised Trauma Score [RTS]/Sort Triage, Injury Severity Score [ISS], and Lerner criteria) when applied using trauma patients. Statistical analysis was used to assess the relationship between each triage category and the secondary outcomes. A total of 3,097 cases were included in the study. Using Sort triage as the standard, SALT and META showed much higher sensitivity and specificity in the Immediate category than for Delayed (Immediate sensitivity META 91.5%, SALT 94.9%; specificity 60.8%, 72.7% versus Delayed sensitivity 28.9%, 1.3%; specificity 42.4%, 28.9%). With the Lerner criteria, in the Immediate category, META had higher sensitivity (77.1%, SALT 68.6%) but lower specificity (61.1%) than SALT (71.8%). For the Delayed category, SALT showed higher sensitivity (META 61.4%, SALT 72.2%), but lower specificity (META 75.1%, SALT 67.2%). Both systems showed a positive, though modest, correlation with ISS. For SALT and META, triaged Immediate patients tended to have higher mortality and longer ICU and hospital lengths-of-stay. Both META and SALT triage appear to be more accurate with Immediate category patients, as opposed to Delayed category patients. With both systems, patients triaged as Immediate have higher mortality and longer lengths-of-stay when compared to Delayed patients. Further research can help refine MCI triage systems and improve accuracy.

The prehospital NEW score to assess septic shock in-hospital, 30-day and 90-day mortality

BackgroundThe early identification of sepsis presenting a high risk of deterioration is a daily challenge to optimise patient pathway. This is all the most crucial in the prehospital setting to optimize triage and admission into the appropriate unit: emergency department (ED) or intensive care unit (ICU). We report the association between the prehospital National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS-2) and in-hospital, 30 and 90-day mortality of SS patients cared for in the pre-hospital setting by a mobile ICU (MICU).MethodsSeptic shock (SS) patients cared for by a MICU between 2016, April 6th and 2021 December 31st were included in this retrospective cohort study. The NEWS-2 is based on 6 physiological variables (blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, temperature, oxygen saturation prior oxygen supplementation, and level of consciousness) and ranges from 0 to 20. The Inverse Probability Treatment Weighting (IPTW) propensity method was applied to assess the association with in-hospital, 30 and 90-day mortality. A NEWS-2 ≥ 7 threshold was chosen for increased clinical deterioration risk definition and usefulness in clinical practice based on previous reports.ResultsData from 530 SS patients requiring MICU intervention in the pre-hospital setting were analysed. The mean age was 69 ± 15 years and presumed origin of sepsis was pulmonary (43%), digestive (25%) or urinary (17%) infection. In-hospital mortality rate was 33%, 30 and 90-day mortality were respectively 31% and 35%. A prehospital NEWS-2 ≥ 7 is associated with an increase in-hospital, 30 and 90-day mortality with respective RRa = 2.34 [1.39–3.95], 2.08 [1.33–3.25] and 2.22 [1.38–3.59]. Calibration statistic values for in-hospital mortality, 30-day and 90-day mortality were 0.54; 0.55 and 0.53 respectively.ConclusionA prehospital NEWS-2 ≥ 7 is associated with an increase in in-hospital, 30 and 90-day mortality of septic shock patients cared for by a MICU in the prehospital setting. Prospective studies are needed to confirm the usefulness of NEWS-2 to improve the prehospital triage and orientation to the adequate facility of sepsis.

Reverse shock index multiplied by simplified motor score as a predictor of clinical outcomes for patients with COVID-19

BackgroundThe reverse shock index (rSI) combined with the Simplified Motor Score (sMS), that is, the rSI-sMS, is a novel and efficient prehospital triage scoring system for patients with COVID-19. In this study, we evaluated the predictive accuracy of the rSI-sMS for general ward and intensive care unit (ICU) admission among patients with COVID-19 and compared it with that of other measures, including the shock index (SI), modified SI (mSI), rSI combined with the Glasgow Coma Scale (rSI-GCS), and rSI combined with the GCS motor subscale (rSI-GCSM).MethodsAll patients who visited the emergency department of Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital between January 2021 and June 2022 were included in this retrospective cohort. A diagnosis of COVID-19 was confirmed through a SARS-CoV-2 reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction test or SARS-CoV-2 rapid test with oropharyngeal or nasopharyngeal swabs and was double confirmed by checking International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification codes in electronic medical records. In-hospital mortality was regarded as the primary outcome, and sepsis, general ward or ICU admission, endotracheal intubation, and total hospital length of stay (LOS) were regarded as secondary outcomes. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine the relationship between the scoring systems and the three major outcomes of patients with COVID-19, including. The discriminant ability of the predictive scoring systems was investigated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, and the most favorable cutoff value of the rSI-sMS for each major outcome was determined using Youden’s index.ResultsAfter 74,183 patients younger than 20 years (n = 11,572) and without COVID-19 (n = 62,611) were excluded, 9,282 patients with COVID-19 (median age: 45 years, interquartile range: 33–60 years, 46.1% men) were identified as eligible for inclusion in the study. The rate of in-hospital mortality was determined to be 0.75%. The rSI-sMS scores were significantly lower in the patient groups with sepsis, hyperlactatemia, admission to a general ward, admission to the ICU, total length of stay ≥ 14 days, and mortality. Compared with the SI, mSI, and rSI-GCSM, the rSI-sMS exhibited a significantly higher accuracy for predicting general ward admission, ICU admission, and mortality but a similar accuracy to that of the rSI-GCS. The optimal cutoff values of the rSI-sMS for predicting general ward admission, ICU admission, and mortality were calculated to be 3.17, 3.45, and 3.15, respectively, with a predictive accuracy of 86.83%, 81.94%%, and 90.96%, respectively.ConclusionsCompared with the SI, mSI, and rSI-GCSM, the rSI-sMS has a higher predictive accuracy for general ward admission, ICU admission, and mortality among patients with COVID-19.

Abstract TMP82: How Well Do Prehospital Stroke Triage Scores Identify Patients With Intracerebral Hemorrhage?

Background: Prehospital stroke triage scores aim to identify LVO patients who benefit from direct transport to high-level stroke centers for EVT by bypassing primary stroke centers. Patients with ICH may benefit from direct transport to high-level centers for neurologic intensive care and hematoma evacuation. Lobar ICH patients may particularly benefit as randomized clinical trial data suggest hematoma evacuation is more effective in these patients. We determined the ability of prehospital LVO triage scores to identify ICH patients and to discriminate lobar from non-lobar ICH. Methods: We identified ICH cases presenting to the ED in Greater Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky in 2005, 2010, and 2015. Cases were identified by ICD codes (ICD9 430-438, ICD10 G45-46, H34.11-12, I60-69), clinical data was extracted by a research nurse and adjudicated by physicians. The CSTAT and RACE scores were abstracted from the NIHSS. We calculated the proportion of ICH patients with a CSTAT ≥ 2 and a RACE ≥ 5, cut-offs used to bypass primary stroke centers, and the scores’ ability to distinguish lobar from non-lobar ICH. Results: We identified 904 ICH patients (median age 72, 54% female, 25% Black). CSTAT was ≥ 2 in 45% of all ICH patients while 27% had a RACE ≥ 5. These score cut-offs identified patients with more severe deficits (Table). Among patients with lobar ICH (n=391), 44% had a CSTAT ≥ 2 and 27% had a RACE ≥ 5. Results were similar for non-lobar ICH (n=473, 45% CSTAT ≥ 2 and 26% RACE ≥ 5). Both scores performed poorly in differentiating lobar from non-lobar ICH (CSTAT ≥ 2: sensitivity 0.44, specificity 0.55, AUC 0.52; RACE ≥ 5: sensitivity 0.27, specificity 0.74, AUC 0.53). Conclusion: Prehospital LVO triage scores identified fewer than half of all ICH patients and did not discriminate between lobar and non-lobar ICH. New prehospital triage scores are needed to identify all ICH patients, or perhaps ICH subgroups, along with LVO patients who benefit from direct transport to high-level stroke centers.

Abstract 151: GFAP Measurements for Rapid Prehospital Identification of Intracranial Hemorrhage in Patients With Acute Coma

Background: Prehospital triage and treatment of patients with acute coma is challenging for rescue services, as the underlying pathogenetic conditions are highly heterogenous and difficult to assess. Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) has been recently identified as a biomarker of intracerebral hemorrhage. The aim of this study was to test the diagnostic value of a GFAP point-of-care(poc) device to rapidly differentiate intracranial hemorrhage from other causes of acute coma (including seizures, metabolic disorders, cardiovascular disorders, and intoxication) in the prehospital phase. Methods: Patients who were admitted to the emergency department due to acute coma (Glasgow Coma Scale scores between 3-8) were enrolled prospectively. Blood samples were collected already in the prehospital phase. Plasma GFAP measurements were performed on the i-STAT Alinity® (Abbott) device (duration of analysis 15 min). The primary endpoint was the final diagnosis at hospital discharge. Results: 95 patients were enrolled (mean age 64±20 years, 43% female). GFAP concentrations were strongly elevated in patients with a primary cerebral cause of coma compared to primary non-cerebral causes (p&lt;0.001). The GFAP concentrations (mean±SD in pg/mL) according to final diagnosis were as follows: intracerebral hemorrhage 4840±4500 (n=15), subarachnoid hemorrhage 4858±4662 (n=11), subdural or epidural hematoma 3462±4005 (n=4), ischemic stroke 992±2857 (n=12), seizure 45±21 (n=11), cardiovascular or metabolic disorder 258±888 (n=29), intoxication 30±2 (n=6), psychogenic stupor 29±0 (n=2); n=5 patients had missing diagnoses. GFAP values over 1000 pg/ml indicated a primary cerebral cause of coma with 100% certainty (hereof, 86% had intracranial hemorrhage). Conclusion: Increased GFAP plasma values in patients with acute coma identify a primary cerebral cause of coma (mostly intracranial hemorrhage) with very high diagnostic accuracy. Patients with primary non-cerebral causes of coma showed overall low GFAP concentrations. Prehospital GFAP measurements on a poc platform may allow rapid stratification according to the underlying cause of coma by rescue services. This could have major impact on triage and management of these critically ill patients.

Abstract WMP46: Rurality Affects Access to Mechanical Thrombectomy for Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke on a Global Scale

Introduction: Global mechanical thrombectomy access (MTA) for large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke is extremely low. Rural patients are less likely to receive initial care at a thrombectomy-capable hospital. While regional studies have suggested rurality as a barrier to MTA, the magnitude and variability of this effect across countries is unknown. The aim of this study is to evaluate the association of country-level % of the rural population with access to mechanical thrombectomy. Methods: We conducted an online survey of 75 countries through the Mission Thrombectomy 2020+ (MT2020+) global professional peer network between November 22, 2020, and February 28, 2021. Questions included country-level availability of MT centers, operators, procedures, reimbursement, emergency medical services, cultural barriers, and other factors affecting systems of stroke care. MTA was defined as the estimated proportion of patients with thrombectomy-eligible LVOs receiving MT in each region annually. We used the World Bank data to obtain the income class based on per capita GNI of a country and the proportion of rural population expressed as % of total population of each country. In the final analysis, 60 countries were included. We used multivariable-adjusted generalized linear models with logit link to evaluate the association of rural population % with MT access. Results: The median country-level % of rural population among 60 countries was 30.5% (IQR 16.1-45.7%). In univariable generalized linear models, each 5% increase in country-level % of rural population was associated with 22% lower odds of MT access (OR 0.78, 95%CI 0.70-0.86, p&lt;0.001). After adjustment for differences in country-level % of GDP spent on healthcare, reimbursement for MT, country’s income class, prehospital emergency services (EMS) system availability, training, and triage systems, each 5% increase in % of rural population was associated with 6% lower odds of MT access (OR 0.94, 95%CI 0.90-0.99, p=0.013). Conclusion: The % of rural population of countries is a significant independent negative predictor of access to mechanical thrombectomy. The % of rural populations and its distribution within countries needs to be carefully studied, as policies to improve access are created and implemented.

Sex Differences in Prehospital Identification of Large Vessel Occlusion in Patients With Suspected Stroke.

Differences in clinical presentation of acute ischemic stroke between men and women may affect prehospital identification of anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (aLVO). We assessed sex differences in diagnostic performance of 8 prehospital scales to detect aLVO. We analyzed pooled individual patient data from 2 prospective cohort studies (LPSS [Leiden Prehospital Stroke Study] and PRESTO [Prehospital Triage of Patients With Suspected Stroke Study]) conducted in the Netherlands between 2018 and 2019, including consecutive patients ≥18 years suspected of acute stroke who presented within 6 hours after symptom onset. Ambulance paramedics assessed clinical items from 8 prehospital aLVO detection scales: Los Angeles Motor Scale, Rapid Arterial Occlusion Evaluation, Cincinnati Stroke Triage Assessment Tool, Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale, Prehospital Acute Stroke Severity, gaze-face-arm-speech-time, Conveniently Grasped Field Assessment Stroke Triage, and Face-Arm-Speech-Time Plus Severe Arm or Leg Motor Deficit. We assessed the diagnostic performance of these scales for identifying aLVO at prespecified cut points for men and women. Of 2358 patients with suspected stroke (median age, 73 years; 47% women), 231 (10%) had aLVO (100/1114 [9%] women and 131/1244 [11%] men). The area under the curve of the scales ranged from 0.70 (95% CI, 0.65-0.75) to 0.77 (95% CI, 0.73-0.82) in women versus 0.69 (95% CI, 0.64-0.73) to 0.75 (95% CI, 0.71-0.79) in men. Positive predictive values ranged from 0.23 (95% CI, 0.20-0.27) to 0.29 (95% CI, 0.26-0.31) in women versus 0.29 (95% CI, 0.24-0.33) to 0.37 (95% CI, 0.32-0.43) in men. Negative predictive values were similar (0.95 [95% CI, 0.94-0.96] to 0.98 [95% CI, 0.97-0.98] in women versus 0.94 [95% CI, 0.93-0.95] to 0.96 [95% CI, 0.94-0.97] in men). Sensitivity of the scales was slightly higher in women than in men (0.53 [95% CI, 0.43-0.63] to 0.76 [95% CI, 0.68-0.84] versus 0.49 [95% CI, 0.40-0.57] to 0.63 [95% CI, 0.55-0.73]), whereas specificity was lower (0.79 [95% CI, 0.76-0.81] to 0.87 [95% CI, 0.84-0.89] versus 0.82 [95% CI, 0.79-0.84] to 0.90 [95% CI, 0.88-0.91]). Rapid arterial occlusion evaluation showed the highest positive predictive values in both sexes (0.29 in women and 0.37 in men), reflecting the different event rates. aLVO scales show similar diagnostic performance in both sexes. The rapid arterial occlusion evaluation scale may help optimize prehospital transport decision-making in men as well as in women with suspected stroke.

Review article: Pre-hospital trauma guidelines and access to lifesaving interventions in Australia and Aotearoa/New Zealand.

The centralisation of trauma services in western countries has led to an improvement in patient outcomes. Effective trauma systems include a pre-hospital trauma system. Delivery of high-level pre-hospital trauma care must include identification of potential major trauma patients, access and correct application of lifesaving interventions (LSIs) and timely transport to definitive care. Globally, many nations endorse nationwide pre-hospital major trauma triage guidelines, to ensure a universal approach to patient care. This paper examined clinical guidelines from all 10 EMS in Australia and Aotearoa/New Zealand. All relevant trauma guidelines were included, and key information was extracted. Authors compared major trauma triage criteria, all LSI included in guidelines, and guidelines for transport to definitive care. The identification of major trauma patients varied between all 10 EMS, with no universal criteria. The most common approach to trauma triage included a three-step assessment process: physiological criteria, identified injuries and mechanism of injury. Disparity between physiological criteria, injuries and mechanism was found when comparing guidelines. All 10 EMS had fundamental LSI included in their trauma guidelines. Fundamental LSI included haemorrhage control (arterial tourniquets, pelvic binders), non-invasive airway management (face mask ventilation, supraglottic airway devices) and pleural wall needle decompression. Variation in more advanced LSI was evident between EMS. Optimising trauma triage guidelines is an important aspect of a robust and evidence driven trauma system. The lack of consensus in trauma triage identified in the present study makes benchmarking and comparison of trauma systems difficult.

Epidemiology of patients assessed for trauma by Swedish ambulance services: a retrospective registry study

BackgroundThere is a lack of knowledge regarding the epidemiology of severe trauma assessed by Swedish emergency medical services (EMS).AimTo investigate the prevalence of trauma in Sweden assessed by EMS from a national perspective and describe patient demography, aetiology, trauma type, prehospital triage and clinical outcomes.MethodsData from two national quality registries, the Swedish Ambulance Registry and the Swedish Trauma Registry (SweTrau) were collected from January 1 to December 31, 2019. Inclusion criteria were an Emergency Symptoms and Signs code equivalent to trauma in the Swedish Ambulance Registry and criteria fulfilled for SweTrau inclusion. Exclusion criteria were patients < 18 years old, those not transported to a hospital and those without a personal identification number.ResultsIn total, 53,120 patients with trauma were included (14% of primary EMS missions involving a personal identification number). Of those, 2,278 (4.3%) patients (median age: 45 years; 32% women) were reported in SweTrau to have severe or potentially severe trauma (penetrating: 7%, blunt: 93%). In terms of including all causes of trauma, the code for ‘trauma alert activation’ was most frequent (55%). The most frequent injury mechanism was an injury caused by a car (34%). Most (89%) cases were assigned Priority 1 (life-threatening condition) at the dispatch centre. 62% were regarded as potentially life threatening upon EMS arrival, whereas 29% were assessed as non-life-threatening. Overall, 25% of the patients had new injury severity scores > 15. 12% required invasive treatment, 11% were discharged with severe disability and the 30-day mortality rate was 3.6%.ConclusionIn this cross-sectional study, 14% of the primary EMS missions for one year were caused by trauma. However, only a small proportion of these cases are severe injuries, and the risk of severe disabilities and death appears to be limited. The most frequent aetiology of a severe trauma is injury caused by a car, and most severe traumas are blunt. Severe traumas are given the highest priority at the dispatch centre in the vast majority of cases, but nearly one-third of these cases are considered a low priority by the EMS nurse. The latter leaves room for improvement.