Prehospital Patients Research Articles

Traction Splinting for midshaft femoral fractures in the pre-hospital and Emergency Department environment—A systematic review

IntroductionPain and hemorrhage are common in midshaft femoral fractures. Traction splints (TSs) can reduce pain and control hemorrhage, but evidence of their effectiveness in femoral fractures is still lacking. Through a systematic review, we aimed to analyze and discuss the potential role of TSs in the prehospital and emergency department (ED) setting. MethodsThe Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane, and PubMed databases were searched up to January 2022. All studies on femoral fractures in the prehospital or ED setting that compared TSs with immobilization or no intervention were included. Articles not written in English, German, or Dutch were excluded. Two authors screened all articles, assessed their quality, and included them if both agreed on their inclusion. The risk of bias was assessed using the modified Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS). The primary outcome measures were pain and hemorrhage control, while the secondary outcome measures were survivability, morbidity, and complications. ResultsA total of 1,248 articles matched the search strategy, 24 articles were assessed for eligibility based on their abstracts, resulting in 20 articles being included in the synthesis. Ten articles reviewed the effects of TSs on pain, while five reported that the use of a TS was appropriate. All five articles that reviewed blood loss found benefits from the use of a TS. One study found significantly fewer pulmonary complications in patients who were splinted earlier at the scene of injury (level III). No difference was found in complications or mortality between prehospital patients receiving a TS or no TS (level III). None of the studies noted that TSs were a necessity in the ED setting; however, some argued that a TS is a necessary and useful prehospital tool in rural or military areas. ConclusionTS use is associated with a decreased necessity for blood transfusions and fewer pulmonary complications. No favorable effects were found in terms of pain relief. We recommend the use of TSs in situations where one is likely to encounter a femoral fracture as well as when the time to definitive treatment is long. Further well-designed studies are required to validate these recommendations.

Risk factors of in-hospital mortality in patients with pneumocystis pneumonia diagnosed by metagenomics next-generation sequencing.

ObjectivesThe metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) test is useful for rapid and accurate detection and identification of pathogenic microorganisms. The aim of the present study was to investigate the factors associated with in-hospital mortality in pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) patients with mNGS-assisted diagnosis.MethodsOur study enrolled 154 patients with mNGS-positive PCP from August 2018 to February 2022 at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University respectively. Patients were divided into the survivor group (n=98) and the death group (n=56) according to whether in-hospital death occurred. Baseline characteristics, patients’ pre-hospital symptoms and patients’ CT imaging performance during hospitalization were carefully compared between the two groups. Risk factors for the occurrence of in-hospital death were sought by selecting indicators that were significantly different between the two groups for modelling and performing multiple logistic regression analysis.ResultsCompared with the in-hospital death patients, the survivors were younger and had higher levels of albumin (ALB) (age: 50.29 ± 14.63 years vs 59.39 ± 12.27 years, p<0.001; ALB: 32.24 ± 5.62 g/L vs 29.34 ± 5.42g/L, p=0.002; respectively), while the levels of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and C-reactive protein CRP were lower (LDH: 574.67 ± 421.24 U/L vs 960.80 ± 714.94 U/L, p=0.001; CRP: 54.97 ± 55.92 mg/L vs80.45 ± 73.26 mg/L, p=0.018; respectively). Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that age, the baseline LDH and CRP levels were all positively associated with high in-hospital mortality [age: OR(95%CI): 1.115 (1.062-1.172), p<0.001; LDH: OR(95%CI): 1.002 (1.001-1.003), p<0.001; CRP: OR(95%CI): 1.008 (1.000-1.017), p=0.045; respectively] while the platelet counts was negatively associated with it [OR(95%CI): 0.986 (0.979-0.992), p<0.001].ConclusionsOld age, high baseline levels of LDH and CRP and low platelet counts were risk factors of the in-hospital mortality in mNGS positive PCP patients.

Weighty Matters: A Real-World Comparison of the Handtevy and Broselow Methods of Prehospital Weight Estimation.

The majority of pediatric medications are dosed according to weight and therefore accurate weight assessment is essential. However, this can be difficult in the unpredictable and peripatetic prehospital care setting, and medication errors are common. The Handtevy method and the Broselow tape are two systems designed to guide Emergency Medical Services (EMS) providers in both pediatric patient weight estimation and medication dosing. The accuracy of the Handtevy method of weight estimation as practiced in the field by EMS has not been previously examined. The primary objective of this study was to examine the field performance of the Handtevy method and the Broselow tape with respect to prehospital patient weight estimation. This was a retrospective chart review of trauma and non-trauma patients transported by EMS to the emergency department (ED) of a quaternary care children's hospital from January 1, 2021 through June 30, 2021. Demographic data, ED visit information, prehospital weight estimation, and medication dosing were collected and analyzed. Scale-based weight from the ED was used as the standard for comparison. A total of 509 patients <13 years of age were included in this study. The EMS providers using the Broselow method estimated patient weight to within +/-10% of ED scale weight in 51.3% of patients. When using the Handtevy method, the EMS providers estimated patient weight to within +/-10% of ED scale weight in 43.7% of patients. When comparing the Handtevy versus Broselow method of prehospital weight estimation, there was no significant association between method and categorized weight discrepancy (over, under, or accurate estimates - defined as within 10% of ED scale weight; P = .25) or percent weight discrepancy (P = .75). On average, prehospital weight estimation was 6.33% lower than ED weight with use of the Handtevy method and 6.94% lower with use of the Broselow method. This study demonstrated no statistically significant difference between the use of the Handtevy or Broselow methods with respect to prehospital weight estimation. While further research is necessary, these results suggest similar field performance of the Broselow and Handtevy methods.

Patterns of Palliation: A Review of Casualties That Received Pain Management Before Reaching Role 2 in Afghanistan.

Battlefield pain management changed markedly during the first 20 years of the Global War on Terror. Morphine, long the mainstay of combat analgesia, diminished in favor of fentanyl and ketamine for military pain control, but the options are not hemodynamically or psychologically equivalent. Understanding patterns of prehospital analgesia may reveal further opportunities for combat casualty care improvement. Using Department of Defense Trauma Registry data for the Afghanistan conflict from 2005 to 2018, we examined 2,402 records of prehospital analgesia administration to assess temporal trends in medication choice and proportions receiving analgesia, including subanalysis of a cohort screened for an indication with minimal contraindication for analgesia. We further employed frequency matching to explore the presence of disparities in analgesia by casualty affiliation. Proportions of documented analgesia increased throughout the study period, from 0% in 2005 to 70.6% in 2018. Afghan casualties had the highest proportion of documented analgesia (53.0%), versus U.S. military (31.9%), civilian/other (23.3%), and non-U.S. military (19.3%). Fentanyl surpassed morphine in the frequency of administration in 2012. The median age of those receiving ketamine was higher (30 years) than those receiving fentanyl (26 years) or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (23 years). Among the frequency-matched subanalysis, the odds ratio for ketamine administration with Afghan casualties was 1.84 (95% CI, 1.30-2.61). We observed heterogeneity of prehospital patient care across patient affiliation groups, suggesting possible opportunities for improvement toward an overall best practice system. General increase in documented prehospital pain management likely reflects efforts toward complete documentation, as well as improved options for analgesia. Current combat casualty care documentation does not include any standardized pain scale.

HASTANE ÖNCESİ ACİL SAĞLIK HİZMETLERİNDE COVID-19 TANILI HASTALARIN NAKİL ORGANİZASYONU –KILAVUZ ARAYIŞLARI

Hayati fonksiyonları yetersiz olan, kritik durumdaki hastaların "nakilleri", acil bakım veren profesyoneller ve hasta açısından yüksek risk ve zorluklar içerir. Kritik durumdaki bu hastaların nakilleri, kanıta dayalı tıbbi önerilere uygun geliştirilmiş protokollere göre gerçekleştirilmelidir. Hastane öncesi acil sağlık çalışanları çok farklı tiplerde nakil yaparlar, bu nakiller arasında bulaşıcılığı olan hastaların nakilleri ise özel profesyonel yaklaşım gerektirir. Günümüzde damlacık ve/veya temas yolu ile bulaşan COVID-19 şüpheli/tanılı hasta nakilleri en yaygın nakil tiplerinden olmuştur. COVID-19 gibi bulaşma potansiyeli çok yüksek ve ölümcül etkileri olan hastaların nakilleri “kritik durumdaki hasta” nakil ilkelerine uyularak yapılmalıdır. Kaynakların en iyi şekilde yönetilerek kullanılması ve nakle eşlik eden personele yönelik risklerin azaltılması için şüpheli/tanılı COVID-19 vakalarının doğru bir şekilde tanımlanması ve bu hastaların naklinde yer alan tarafların arasında net nakil planlarının yapılması her zamankinden daha önemlidir. Nakil sırasında, personele kişisel koruyucu ekipmanın sağlanması, ambulansın dezenfeksiyon ve dekontaminasyonu hastane öncesi acil sağlık çalışanlarının ve enfekte olmayan diğer hastaların güvenliği açısından büyük önem taşır. Bu derlemede, COVID-19 hastalarının nakillerinin güvenli bir şekilde gerçekleştirilmesinde uyulması gereken temel ilkeler ve öneriler üzerinde durulmuştur.

Can mesh nebulizers improve prehospital aerosol therapy? An in vitro study on simulated prehospital emergency patients suffering from respiratory distress

HintergrundMedikamentenvernebler im Rettungsdienst sollten eine hohe Vernebelungsleistung haben, um schnell eine therapeutische Wirkstoffkonzentration des vernebelten Medikaments zu erreichen. Eine Umfrage im süddeutschen Rettungsdienst zeigte allerdings, dass fast ausschließlich die wenig effizienten Jet-Vernebler zum Einsatz kommen.Ziel der ArbeitZiel der vorliegenden In-vitro-Studie war es herauszufinden, ob der Einsatz von Mesh-Verneblern die prähospitale Aerosoltherapie verbessern könnte.Material und MethodenDie Vernebelungsleistung eines Jet-Verneblers (Cirrus™ 2, Fa. Intersurgical®) und 2 mobil einsatzbarer Mesh-Vernebler (Aerogen Solo®, Fa. Aerogen Limited, M‑Neb® mobile, NEBU-TEC International med. Produkte Eike Kern GmbH) wurde in einem In-vitro-Modell spontan atmender Notfallpatient*innen mit 4 unterschiedlichen Atemmustern bei verschiedenen Sauerstoffflussraten getestet.ErgebnisseDie Mesh-Vernebler zeigten im Vergleich zum Jet-Vernebler eine signifikant höhere Verneblungsleistung und Salbutamol-Filterdeposition, wobei der M‑Neb® mobile die höchsten Werte für Leistung und Deposition erreichte. Der Sauerstofffluss hatte den größten Einfluss auf die Leistung des Jet-Verneblers, wirkte sich aber kaum auf die Mesh-Vernebler aus. Die Deposition wurde zudem stark vom Atemmuster beeinflusst.DiskussionDer Einsatz von Mesh-Verneblern mit hoher Verneblungsleistung konnte in einem In-vitro-Modell die Aerosoltherapie von prähospitalen Notfallpatient*innen verbessern. Sie waren dem Jet-Vernebler in Bezug auf die Verneblungsleistung und die Lungendeposition überlegen und ermöglichten zudem eine bedarfsangepasste Sauerstofftherapie. Die höchste Medikamentendeposition wurde bei den tachypnoischen Patient*innen erreicht, welche in der praktischen Anwendung auch am meisten von einem erhöhten Medikamentenspiegel profitieren würden.Zusatzmaterial onlineZusätzliche Informationen sind in der Online-Version dieses Artikels (10.1007/s00101-022-01183-y) enthalten (weitere Tabellen).

An increased potential for organ donors may be found among patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

IntroductionA prehospital system where obvious futile cases may be terminated prehospitally by physicians may reduce unethical treatment of dying patients. Withholding treatment in futile cases may seem ethically sound but may keep dying patients from becoming organ donors. The objective of this study was to characterise the prehospital patients who underwent organ donation. The aim was to alert prehospital physicians to a potential for an increase in the organ donor pool by considering continued treatment even in some prehospital patients with obvious fatal lesions or illness.MethodsThis is a retrospective register-based study from the Region of Southern Denmark. The prehospital medical records from patients who underwent organ donation after prehospital care from 1st of January 2016–31st of December 2020 were screened for inclusion. The outcome measures were prehospital diagnosis, vital parameters, and critical interventions.ResultsIn the five year period, one-hundred-and-fifty-one patients were entered into a donation process in the health region following prehospital care. Sixteen patients were excluded due to limitations in data availability. Of the 135 patients included, 36.3% had a stroke. 36.7% of these patients were intubated prehospitally. 15.6% had subarachnoideal haemorrhage. 66.7% of these were intubated prehospitally. 10.4% suffered from head trauma. 64.3% of these patients were intubated at the scene. In 21.5% of the patients, the prehospitally assigned tentative diagnosis was missing or included a diverse spectrum of medical and surgical emergencies. Twenty-two patients (16.3%) were resuscitated from cardiac arrest. 81.8% were intubated at the scene.ConclusionThe majority of the patients who became organ donors presented prehospitally with intracranial pathology. However, 30% of the patients that later underwent an organ donation process had other prehospital diagnoses. Among these, one patient in six had out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Termination of treatment in patients with cardiac arrest is not uncommon in physician-manned prehospital emergency medical systems. An organ donation process cannot be initiated prehospitally but can be shut down if treatment is withheld or terminated. We contend that there is a potential for enlarging the donor pool if the decision processes in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest include considerations concerning future procurement of organ donors.

Incidence of Dissociation With Low-Dose Pre-hospital Ketamine in Geriatric Patients With Trauma-Related Pain.

IntroductionSub-dissociative ketamine has been used increasingly for the treatment of acute pain in a wide variety of settings. While there are studies evaluating its use in the geriatric population, no studies have described its safety in the pre-hospital geriatric trauma patient. The objective of this study was to define the incidence of dissociation with low-dose pre-hospital ketamine in geriatric trauma patients.MethodsUsing our county emergency medical services database, we identified all trauma patients greater or equal to 65 years of age who received pre-hospital ketamine for pain after the implementation of a low-dose ketamine protocol. We retrospectively reviewed pre-hospital and emergency department records for demographics, traumatic injuries, Glasgow Coma Score, emergency department length of stay and disposition, and hospital length of stay. This group was compared to a similar population of trauma patients, transported prior to the ketamine protocol. The comparison group was chosen by matching the ketamine group to more than double the number of non-ketamine patients. Records were obtained from two separate trauma centers. Our primary outcome was documentation of “ketamine-related dissociation” by either the pre-hospital, emergency department or trauma provider. Secondary outcomes included emergency department length of stay and intensive care unit admission.ResultsSeventy-nine patients received ketamine with records available for analysis. One hundred ninety-three non-ketamine patients were compared to this group. There were nosignificant differences between the two groups in regards to age, weight, gender, or mechanism of injury. The injury severity score was higher in the ketamine group. Nine patients (11%) had documented dissociation after ketamine, with six of these patients back to baseline mentation by arrival to the emergency department. The emergency department length of stay was shorter in the ketamine group. The rate of intensive care unit admission was the same between both groups.ConclusionsPre-hospital sub-dissociative ketamine in geriatric trauma patients is associated with brief episodes of dissociation in a small minority of patients.

The Influence of Gender Bias: Is Pain Management in the Field Affected by Health Care Provider's Gender?

Appropriate pain management indicates the quality of casualty care in trauma. Gender bias in pain management focused so far on the patient. Studies regarding provider gender are scarce and have conflicting results, especially in the military and prehospital settings. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of health care providers' gender on pain management approaches among prehospital trauma casualties treated by the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) medical teams. This retrospective cohort study included all trauma casualties treated by IDF senior providers from 2015-2020. Casualties with a pain score of zero, age under 18 years, or treated with endotracheal intubation were excluded. Groups were divided according to the senior provider's gender: only females, males, or both female and male. A multivariate analysis was performed to assess the odds ratio of receiving an analgesic, depending on the presence of a female senior provider, adjusting for potential confounders. A subgroup analysis was performed for "delta-pain," defined as the difference in pain score during treatment. A total of 976 casualties were included, of whom 835 (85.6%) were male. Mean pain scores (SD) for the female only, male only, and both genders providers were 6.4 (SD = 2.9), 6.4 (SD = 3.0), and 6.9 (SD = 2.8), respectively (P = .257). There was no significant difference between females, males, or both female and male groups in analgesic treatment, overall and per specific agent. This remained true also in the multivariate model. Delta-pain difference between groups was also not significant. Less than two-thirds of casualties in this study were treated for pain among all study groups. This study found no association between IDF Medical Corps providers' gender and pain management in prehospital trauma patients. Further studies regarding disparities in acute pain treatment are advised.

Clinical presentation in EMS patients with acute chest pain in relation to sex, age and medical history: prospective cohort study

ObjectiveTo assess symptom presentation related to age, sex and previous medical history in patients with chest pain.DesignProspective observational cohort study.SettingTwo-centre study in a Swedish county emergency medical service (EMS) organisation.ParticipantsUnselected...

Importance of Analyzing Intervals to Emergency Medical Service Treatments

Background Although most US emergency medical services (EMS) systems collect time-to-treatment data in their electronic prehospital patient care reports (PCRs), analysis of these data seldom appears in publications. We believe EMS agencies should routinely analyze the initial time-to-treatment data for various potentially life-threatening conditions. This not only assures that protocol-required treatments have been provided but can discover avoidable delays and drive protocol/treatment priority change. Our study purpose was to analyze the interval from 9-1-1 call receipt until the first administration of naloxone to adult opioid overdose victims to demonstrate the quality assurance importance of analyzing time-to-treatment data. Methods Retrospective analysis of intervals from 9-1-1 call receipt to initial naloxone treatment in adult opioid overdose victims. We excluded victims <18 years of age and cases where a bystander, police, or a health care worker gave naloxone before EMS arrival. We compared data collected before and during the COVID-19 pandemic to determine its effect on the analysis. Results The mean patient age of 582 opioid overdose victims was 40.7 years [95% CI 39.6, 41.8] with 405 males (69.6%). EMS units’ scene arrival was 6.7 minutes from the 9-1-1 call receipt. It took 1.8 minutes to reach the victim, and 8.6 additional minutes to administer the first naloxone regardless of administration route (70.4% intravenous, 26.1% intranasal, 2.7% intraosseous, 0.7% intramuscular). EMS personnel administered the first naloxone 17.1 minutes after the 9-1-1 call receipt, with 50.3% of the delay occurring after patient contact. There was no statistically significant difference in the times-to-treatment before vs. during the pandemic. Conclusion The prepandemic interval from 9-1-1 call receipt until initial EMS administration of naloxone was substantial and did not change significantly during COVID-19. Our findings exemplify why EMS agencies should analyze initial time-to-treatment data, especially for life-threatening conditions, beyond assuring that protocol-required treatments have been provided. Based on our analysis, fire department crews now carry intranasal naloxone, and intranasal naloxone is given to “impaired" opioid overdose victims the first-arriving fire department or EMS personnel. We continue to collect data on intervals-to-treatment prospectively and monitor our critical process/treatment intervals using the plan-do-study-act model to improve our process/carry out change, and publish our results in a future publication.

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy to Identify ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction on Interpretations of Prehospital Electrocardiograms.

Background: The aim of this study was to assess and discuss the diagnostic accuracy of prehospital ECG interpretation through systematic review and meta-analyses.Methods and Results: Relevant literature published up to July 2020 was identified using PubMed. All human studies of prehospital adult patients suspected of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in which prehospital electrocardiogram (ECG) interpretation by paramedics or computers was evaluated and reporting all 4 (true-positive, false-positive, false-negative, and true-negative) values were included. Meta-analyses were conducted separately for the diagnostic accuracy of prehospital ECG interpretation by paramedics (Clinical Question [CQ] 1) and computers (CQ2). After screening, 4 studies for CQ1 and 6 studies for CQ2 were finally included in the meta-analysis. Regarding CQ1, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 95.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 82.5–99.0%) and 95.8% (95% CI 82.3–99.1%), respectively. Regarding CQ2, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 85.4% (95% CI 74.1–92.3%) and 95.4% (95% CI 87.3–98.4%), respectively.Conclusions: This meta-analysis suggests that the diagnostic accuracy of paramedic prehospital ECG interpretations is favorable, with high pooled sensitivity and specificity, with an acceptable estimated number of false positives and false negatives. Computer-assisted ECG interpretation showed high pooled specificity with an acceptable estimated number of false positives, whereas the pooled sensitivity was relatively low.

Evaluation of the effectiveness and costs of inhaled methoxyflurane versus usual analgesia for prehospital injury and trauma: non-randomised clinical study

BackgroundWe aimed to investigate clinical benefits and economic costs of inhaled methoxyflurane when used by ambulance staff for prehospital emergency patients with trauma. Comparison is to usual analgesic practice (UAP) in the UK in which patient records were selected if treatment had been with Entonox® or intravenous morphine or intravenous paracetamol.MethodsOver a 12-month evaluation period, verbal numerical pain scores (VNPS) were gathered from adults with moderate to severe trauma pain attended by ambulance staff trained in administering and supplied with methoxyflurane. Control VNPS were obtained from ambulance database records of UAP in similar patients for the same period. Statistical modelling enabled comparisons of methoxyflurane to UAP, where we employed an Ordered Probit panel regression model for pain, linked by observational rules to VNPS.ResultsOverall, 96 trained paramedics and technicians from the East Midlands Ambulance Service NHS Trust (EMAS) prepared 510 doses of methoxyflurane for administration to a total of 483 patients. Comparison data extracted from the EMAS database of UAP episodes involved: 753 patients using Entonox®, 802 patients using intravenous morphine, and 278 patients using intravenous paracetamol. Modelling results included demonstration of faster pain relief with inhaled methoxyflurane (all p-values < 0.001). Methoxyflurane’s time to achieve maximum pain relief was estimated to be significantly shorter: 26.4 min (95%CI 25.0–27.8) versus Entonox® 44.4 min (95%CI 39.5–49.3); 26.5 min (95%CI 25.0–27.9) versus intravenous morphine 41.8 min (95%CI 38.9–44.7); 26.5 min (95%CI 25.1–28.0) versus intravenous paracetamol 40.8 (95%CI 34.7–46.9). Scenario analyses showed that durations spent in severe pain were significantly less for methoxyflurane. Costing scenarios showed the added benefits of methoxyflurane were achieved at higher cost, eg versus Entonox® the additional cost per treated patient was estimated to be £12.30.ConclusionWhen administered to adults with moderate or severe pain due to trauma inhaled methoxyflurane reduced pain more rapidly and to a greater extent than Entonox® and parenteral analgesics. Inclusion of inhaled methoxyflurane to the suite of prehospital analgesics provides a clinically useful addition, but one that is costlier per treated patient.

Prevalence, severity and preventability of prehospital patient safety incidents.

The provision of safe and effective healthcare is a mainstay for all services and clinicians associated with the delivery of pre-hospital care, however little is empirically known about the prevalence and impact of harm caused in the pre-hospital phase. This commentary critically appraises a recent systematic review which sought to identify the frequency of patient safety incidents and the harm associated with them in prehospital care.

Predictive value of the New Zealand Early Warning Score for early mortality in low-acuity patients discharged at scene by paramedics: an observational study

ObjectivesThe utility of New Zealand Early Warning Score (NZEWS) for prediction of adversity in low-acuity patients discharged at scene by paramedics has not been investigated. The objective of this study...

Implications of systemic racism in emergency medical services: On prehospital bias and complicity.

Public health research has increasingly proven racial disparities within emergency medicine, as exemplified by the fallibility of pulse oximeters resulting in unreliable detection of respiratory compromise, to implicitly biased clinical perception of pain in Black and Brown patients.1 There is a lack of literature detailing the complicity of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) clinicians who sit among a nation with an inequitable healthcare system. In this piece, we aim to shed light on how disparities in prehospital emergency medical care harm patients of color.

Retrospective Comparison of Prehospital Sustained Return of Spontaneous Circulation (ROSC) Rates Within a Single Basic Life Support Jurisdiction Using Manual vs Lund University Cardiac Assist System (LUCAS-2) Mechanical Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.

ObjectiveSeveral studies have examined the impact of mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) devices among multi-jurisdictional emergency medical services (EMS) systems; however, the variability across such systems can inject bias and confounding variables. We focused our investigation on the effect of introducing the Lund University Cardiac Assist System 2 (LUCAS-2) into a single basic life support (BLS) fire department first response jurisdiction served by a single private advanced life support (ALS) agency, hypothesizing that the implementation of the device would increase prehospital return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) rates as compared with manual CPR. MethodsA retrospective observational analysis of adult non-traumatic prehospital cardiac arrest ALS agency records was conducted. Descriptive statistics were computed, and logistic regression was used to assess the impact of CPR method, response time, age, gender, CPR initiator, witnessed status, automated external defibrillator (AED) initiator, and presence of an initial shockable rhythm on ROSC rates. A Chi-square analysis was used to compare ROSC rates among compression modalities both before and after the implementation of LUCAS-2 on July 1, 2011. ResultsFrom an initial dataset of 857 cardiac arrest records, only 264 (74 pre-LUCAS period, 190 LUCAS-2 period) met inclusion criteria for the primary objective. The ROSC rates were 29.7% (22/74) and 29.5% (56/190), respectively, for manual-only and LUCAS-assisted CPR (p=0.9673). Logistic regression revealed a significant association between ROSC and two of the independent variables: arrest witnessed (OR 3.104; 95% CI 1.896-5.081; p<0.0001) and initial rhythm shockable (OR 2.785; 95% CI 1.492-5.199; p<0.0013). ConclusionsAnalyses support the null hypothesis that there is no difference in prehospital ROSC rates among adult non-traumatic cardiac arrest patients when comparing mechanical-assisted and manual-only CPR. These results are consistent with other larger multi-jurisdictional mechanical CPR studies. Systems with limited personnel might consider augmenting their resuscitations with a mechanical CPR device, although cost and system design should be factored into the decision. Secondary analysis of independent variables suggests that prehospital cardiac arrest patients with a witnessed arrest or an initial rhythm that is shockable have a higher likelihood of attaining ROSC. The power of our primary objective was limited by the sample size. Additionally, we were not able to adequately assess the quality of CPR among the two comparison groups with a lack of consistent end-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO2) data.

Prehospital fluid therapy in patients with suspected infection: a survey of ambulance personnel’s practice

BackgroundFluid therapy in patients with suspected infection is controversial, and it is not known whether fluid treatment administered in the prehospital setting is beneficial. In the absence of evidence-based guidelines for prehospital fluid therapy for patients with suspected infection, Emergency Medical Services (EMS) personnel are challenged on when and how to initiate such therapy.This study aimed to assess EMS personnel’s decision-making in prehospital fluid therapy, including triggers for initiating fluid and fluid volumes, as well as the need for education and evidence-based guidelines on prehospital fluid therapy in patients with suspected infection.MethodsAn online survey concerning fluid administration in prehospital patients with suspected infection was distributed to all EMS personnel in the Central Denmark Region, including ambulance clinicians and prehospital critical care anaesthesiologists (PCCA). The survey consisted of sections concerning academic knowledge, statements about fluid administration, triggers to evaluate patient needs for intravenous fluid, and clinical scenarios.ResultsIn total, 468/807 (58%) ambulance clinicians and 106/151 (70%) PCCA responded to the survey. Of the respondents, 73% (n = 341) of the ambulance clinicians and 100% (n = 106) of the PCCA felt confident about administering fluids to prehospital patients with infections. However, both groups primarily based their fluid-related decisions on “clinical intuition”. Ambulance clinicians named the most frequently faced challenges in fluid therapy as “Unsure whether the patient needs fluid” and “Unsure about the volume of fluid the patient needs”. The five most frequently used triggers for evaluating fluid needs were blood pressure, history taking, skin turgor, capillary refill time, and shock index, the last of which only applied to ambulance clinicians. In the scenarios, the majority administered 500 ml to a normotensive woman with suspected sepsis and 1000 ml to a woman with suspected sepsis-related hypotension. Moreover, 97% (n = 250) of the ambulance clinicians strongly agreed or agreed that they were interested in more education about fluid therapy in patients with suspected infection.ConclusionThe majority of ambulance clinicians and PCCA based their fluid administration on “clinical intuition”. They faced challenges deciding on fluid volumes and individual fluid needs. Thus, they were eager to learn more and requested research and evidence-based guidelines.

Therapeutic Values of Ketamine for COVID-19-Cared Patients: An Expert’s Point of View

Ketamine has long been used in the field of anesthesia [1]. Its rapid and long-acting analgesic effects associated with its dissociative properties have also established its use in prehospital and emergency department patients [2]. Both the D- and the S-ketamine enantiomers are included in the list of narcotic drugs, and therefore ketamine is legally administered under surveillance.

Description of the 2020 NEMSIS Public-Release Research Dataset

Background The National Emergency Medical Services Information System (NEMSIS) is a federally funded program designed to standardize Emergency Medical Services (EMS) patient care reporting and facilitate state and national data repositories for the assessment and improvement of EMS systems of care. This manuscript characterizes the 2020 submissions to the National EMS Database, detailing the strengths and limitations associated with use of these data for public health surveillance, improving prehospital patient care, critical resource allocation, clinician safety, system quality assurance and research purposes. Methodology Using the 2020 NEMSIS Public-Release Research Dataset (NEMSIS dataset), we evaluated the dataset completeness (i.e., presence of missing/null values), dataset content and assessed data generalizability. The analysis focused on 9-1-1 EMS activations resulting in the treatment and transport of a patient, except for out-of-hospital cardiac arrests for which all patients were included regardless of transport status. Results In 2020, 43,488,767 EMS activations were reported to the National EMS Database by 12,319 agencies serving 50 states and territories. Of the 19,533,036 9-1-1 EMS activations reportedly treating and transporting a patient, the majority were attended by “non-volunteer” clinicians (77%) working in a fire-based EMS agency (35%) certified to offer Advanced Life Support (ALS) Paramedic service (80%) and located in an urban area (82%). 9-1-1 call centers most often dispatched EMS for “sick person” (20%), while EMS clinicians most likely reported asthenia (7%) as the patient’s primary symptom as well as the clinician’s primary impression (6%), and documented “fall on same level, slip, or trip” as the most common cause of injury (37%). The NEMSIS dataset demonstrates some “missingness” and element inconsistencies, but methods may be employed to mitigate these data limitations. Conclusions The National EMS Database is a free and publicly available resource for evaluating EMS system utilization, response, and prehospital patient care. Understanding the characteristics of the underlying dataset and known data limitations will help ensure proper analysis and reporting of research and quality metrics based on nationally standardized NEMSIS data.