pre-DAA Era Research Articles

Hepatitis C Treatment in People With HIV: Potential to Eliminate Disease and Disparity.

Access to direct acting antivirals (DAAs) may be associated with reductions in hepatitis C virus (HCV) viremia prevalence among people with human immunodeficiency virus (PWH). Among 3755 PWH, estimated HCV viremia prevalence decreased by 94.0% from 36% (95% confidence interval [CI], 27%-46%) in 2009 (pre-DAA era) to 2% (95% CI, 0%-4%) in 2021 (DAA era). Male sex, black race, and older age were associated with HCV viremia in 2009 but not in 2021. Injection drug use remained associated with HCV viremia in 2009 and 2021. Targeted interventions are needed to meet the HCV care needs of PWH who use drugs.

Engagement with the HCV care cascade among high-risk groups: A population-based study.

HCV elimination requires a thorough understanding of the care cascade. A direct-acting antiviral (DAA)-era description of the care cascade has not been undertaken in Ontario, Canada's most populous jurisdiction. Our primary objective was to describe the current population-level care cascade in the general Ontario population and among key risk groups ─ baby boomers, immigrants, and individuals experiencing residential instability. The secondary objective was to identify predictors of engagement. We conducted a population-based cohort study of Ontario residents undergoing HCV testing between January 1, 1999, and December 31, 2018, and mapped the care cascade [antibody-diagnosed, RNA tested, RNA positive, genotyped, treated, achieved sustained virologic response, reinfected/relapsed] as of December 31, 2018. The cascade was stratified by risk groups. Cause-specific hazard modeling was used to identify demographic, and socioeconomic predictors of engagement with key steps of the cascade. Among 108,428 Ontario residents living with an HCV antibody diagnosis, 88% received confirmatory RNA testing; of these, 62% tested positive and 94% of positive tests were genotyped. Of those with confirmed viremia, 53% initiated treatment and 76% of treated individuals achieved sustained virologic response, while ~1% experienced reinfection or relapse. Males, older birth cohorts, long-term residents, those with a history of substance use disorder and social marginalization (eg, material deprivation, residential instability), and those initially diagnosed in the pre-DAA era exhibited lower rates of engagement with almost every step of HCV care. Despite DAA era improvements, treatment initiation remains a major gap. HCV screening and linkage-to-treatment, particularly for those with a history of substance use disorder and social marginalization, will be needed to equitably close gaps in HCV care in the province.

Hepatitis C and heart transplantation: An update.

There are limited data regarding heart transplantation in the setting of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in either recipients or donors, as the practice was infrequent, given concerns of worse post-transplant outcomes. This changed dramatically after the development of highly effective HCV therapies, namely direct-acting antivirals (DAAs). Additionally, nucleic acid testing currently in use establishes more precisely the risk of HCV transmission from donors. As a result, chronic HCV infection in itself is no longer a barrier for heart transplant candidates, and the use of HCV-positive organs for HCV-infected and non-infected transplant candidates has increased dramatically. A review of the literature revealed that in the pre-DAA era, HCV seropositive heart transplant patients had a higher mortality than their seronegative counterparts. However, short-term data suggest that the differences in survival have been erased in the DAA era. Heart transplantation from HCV-viremic donors to HCV-uninfected recipients has become increasingly common as the number of deceased donors with HCV viremia has increased over the past years. Preliminary outcome reports are very encouraging, although further data are needed with regard to long-term safety. New information continues to be incorporated to optimize protocols that guide this practice.

Reduction in Racial and Ethnic Disparity in Survival Following Liver Transplant for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the Direct-acting Antiviral Era

Black patients with hepatocellular cancer (HCC), often attributed to hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, have suboptimal survival following liver transplant (LT). We evaluated the impact of direct-acting antiviral (DAA) availability on racial and ethnic disparities in wait list burden post-LT survival for candidates with HCC. Using the United Network for Organ Sharing registry, we identified patients with HCC who were listed and/or underwent LT from 2009 to 2020. Based on date of LT, patients were categorized into 2 era-based cohorts: the pre-DAA era (LT between 2009 and 2011) and DAA era (LT between 2015 and 2017, with follow-up through 2020). Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards analyses were used to compare post-LT survival, stratified by era and race and ethnicity. Annual wait list additions for HCV-related HCC decreased significantly in White and Hispanic patients during the DAA era, with no change (P= .14) in Black patients. Black patients had lower 3-year survival than White patients in the pre-DAA era (70.6% vs 80.1%, respectively; P < .001) but comparable survival in the DAA era (82.1% vs 85.5%, respectively; P= .16). 0n multivariable analysis, Black patients in the pre-DAA era had a 53% higher risk (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.28-1.84), for mortality than White patients, but mortality was comparable in the DAA era (adjusted HR, 1.23; 95% CI, 0.99-1.52). In a stratified analysis in Black patients, HCV-related HCC carried more than a 2-fold higher risk of mortality in the pre-DAA era (adjusted HR, 2.86; 95% CI, 1.50-5.43), which was reduced in the DAA era (adjusted HR, 1.34; 95% CI, 0.78-2.30). With the availability of DAA therapy, racial disparities in post-LT survival have improved.

Improved Survival After Liver Transplantation for Patients With Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) and HIV/Hepatitis C Virus Coinfection in the Integrase Strand Transfer Inhibitor and Direct-Acting Antiviral Eras.

People with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) with and without hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfection had poor outcomes after liver transplant (LT). Integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) and direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) have changed the treatment landscape for HIV and HCV, respectively, but their impact on LT outcomes remains unclear. This retrospective analysis of adults with HIV monoinfection (n = 246) and HIV/HCV coinfection (n = 286) who received LT compared mortality in patients with HIV who received LT before versus after approval of INSTIs and in patients with HIV/HCV coinfection who received LT before versus after approval of DAAs. In secondary analysis, we compared the outcomes in the different eras with those of propensity score-matched control cohorts of LT recipients without HIV or HCV infection. LT recipients with HIV monoinfection did not experience a significant improvement in survival between the pre-INSTI and INSTI recipients with HIV (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.70 [95% confidence interval {CI}, .36-1.34]). However, recipients with HIV/HCV coinfection in the DAA era had a 47% reduction (aHR, 0.53 [95% CI, .31-9.2] in 1-year mortality compared with coinfected recipients in the pre-DAA era. Compared to recipients without HIV or HCV, HIV-monoinfected recipients had higher mortality during the pre-INSTI era, but survival was comparable between groups during the INSTI era. HIV/HCV-coinfected recipients also experienced comparable survival during the DAA era compared to recipients without HCV or HIV. Post-LT survival for people with HIV monoinfection and HIV/HCV coinfection has improved with the introduction of INSTI and DAA therapy, suggesting that LT has become safer in these populations.

Improving Liver Transplant Outcomes for Hepatitis C Virus Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the Direct-Acting Antiviral Therapy Era

Direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy has transformed the outcomes of liver transplant (LT) with hepatitis C virus (HCV). This study aimed to analyze the effects of DAA treatment for HCV-associated hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in LT. We included patients confirmed with HCC on explant, analyzed data from United Network for Organ Sharing, and defined the pre-DAA era (2012-2013) and DAA era (2014-2016). HCV-associated HCC cases totaled 4778 (62%) during the study period. In the DAA era, the median recipient age was older and the median days on the waiting list were longer. For the donor, median age, body mass index, and the rate of HCV significantly increased in the DAA era. In pathology, the median largest tumor size was significantly higher; however, the rate of completed tumor necrosis was significant higher in the DAA era. The 3-year graft/patient survival had significantly improved in the DAA era. In multivariable analysis, the DAA era (hazard ratio, 0.79; 95% confidence interval, 0.68-0.91) had significantly affected the 3-year graft survival. DAA has a significant beneficial effect on LT. In the DAA era, graft survival for HCV-associated HCC has been significantly improving.

Outcomes of transplantation for HBV- vs. HCV-related HCC: impact of DAA HCV therapy in a national analysis of >20,000 patients.

The development of direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy has revolutionized HCV management. We present a large national study comparing post-LT outcomes for HBV-HCC vs. HCV-HCC according to DAA era. Data were collected from OPTN/UNOS Registry. Groups included pre-DAA (January 2003-October 2013) and post-DAA (November2013-January2019) eras. Outcomes for patients with HBV(n=2000) vs. HCV(n=18,964) were compared in each era. In the pre-DAA era, there were significant differences between HBV-versus HCV, including the percentage of Caucasian race, pre-LT and maximum AFP levels <20ng/mL, MELD-score, complete tumor necrosis, and vascular invasion. In the post-DAA-era, differences were noted in wait time>9 months, the percentage of Caucasian race, pre-LT and AFP(max) levels<20ng/mL, and MELD-score. In the pre-DAA-era, the 5-and-10 year survival rates were 80.5% and 71% for HBV-HCC, and 69% and 54.4% for HCV-HCC (p<0.001); in the post-DAA-era, 5-year survival was 83.4% for HBV-HCC and 78.5% for HCV-HCC(p=0.08). Independent pre-LT predictors of lower survival included recipient and donor age>50yrs, wait-time>9months, higher MELD-score (p<0.001), AFP level>20ng/mL, and MC at diagnosis. HCV status did not predict outcome in the post-DAA-era after adjusting for tumor characteristics. After the introduction of effective DAA-HCV therapy, results of LT for HCV-HCC are significantly improved and are no longer statistically different from results in patients with HBV-HCC.

The 'Viennese epidemic' of acute HCV in the era of direct-acting antivirals.

The recently reported epidemic of acute hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections —observed predominantly among men who have sex with men (MSM)—may now decline due to wide availability of direct‐acting antivirals (DAAs). This study aimed to investigate the current trends of acute hepatitis C in Vienna. Patients presenting with acute hepatitis C between 01/2007 and12/2020 at the Vienna General Hospital were retrospectively enrolled and followed after virologic clearance/eradication. The introduction of unrestricted DAA access after 09/17 defined the ‘DAA era’, as compared to the ‘pre‐DAA era’ prior to 09/17. We identified 134 acute hepatitis C cases in 119 patients with a mean age of 39 ± 9 years at inclusion. The majority of patients were male (92%), HIV‐positive (88%) and MSM (85%). In the DAA era, a history of prior chronic HCV infection at inclusion was found in 24% (11/46) compared to 7% (5/73) in the pre‐DAA era (p = .012). The annual rate of acute hepatitis C cases increased in the DAA era (17.11 per year) compared to the pre‐DAA era (7.76 per year). The DAA era included an AHC‐genotype‐2 cluster and more HIV‐negative acute hepatitis C cases (0% (0/73) vs. 30% (14/46), p < .001). Patients were followed after spontaneous clearance or sustained virologic treatment response (SVR) for a total of 251.88 patient‐years (median 1.39 years per patient). In the DAA era, we recorded 15 acute hepatitis C‐reinfections — corresponding to an incidence rate of 5.96 (95% CI: 3.57–9.66) reinfections per 100‐patient‐years. We continue to observe a high incidence of acute hepatitis C in Vienna in the DAA era—primarily among HIV‐positive MSM, but increasingly also in HIV‐negative MSM.

Improvements in liver transplant outcomes in patients with HCV/HIV coinfection after the introduction of direct-acting antiviral therapies.

In recipients with HCV/HIV coinfection, the impact that the wider use of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) has had on post-liver transplant (LT) outcomes has not been evaluated. We investigated the impact of DAAs introduction on post-LT outcome in patients with HCV/HIV coinfection. Using Organ Procurement and Transplant Network/United Network for Organ Sharing data, we compared post-LT outcomes in patients with HCV and/or HIV pre- and post-DAAs introduction. We categorized these patients into two eras: pre-DAA (2008-2012 [pre-DAA era]) and post-DAA (2014-2019 [post-DAA era]). To study the impact of DAAs introduction, inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to adjust patient characteristics. A total of 17215 LT recipients were eligible for this study (HCV/HIV [n=160]; HIV mono-infection [n=188]; HCV mono-infection [n=16867]). HCV/HIV coinfection and HCV mono-infection had a significantly lower hazard of 1- and 3-year graft loss post-DAA, compared pre-DAA (1-year: adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.29, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.16-0.53 in HIV/HCV, aHR 0.58, 95% CI 0.54-0.63, respectively; 3-year: aHR 0.30, 95% CI 0.14-0.61, aHR 0.64, 95% CI 0.58-0.70, respectively). The hazards of 1- and 3-year graft loss post-DAA in HIV mono-infection were comparable to those in pre-DAA. HCV/HIV coinfection had significantly lower patient mortality post-DAA, compared to pre-DAA (1-year: aHR 0.30, 95% CI 0.17-0.55; 3-year: aHR 0.31, 95% CI 0.15-0.63). Post-LT outcomes in patients with coinfection significantly improved and became comparable to those with HCV mono-infection after introducing DAA therapy. The introduction of DAAs supports the use of LT in the setting of HCV/HIV coinfection.

Are Hepatitis C Positive Female Liver Transplant Recipients Still at Increased Risk for Graft Failure? Reexamining the Disparity in the Modern Era of Direct-acting Antiviral Agents.

This study aimed to compare the outcomes of hepatitis C virus (HCV) positive (+) female liver transplant recipients to HCV negative (-) female and HCV+ male recipients before and after the direct-acting-antiviral (DAA) era. The United Network for Organ Sharing liver transplant database was retrospectively reviewed from 2002 to 2017. The DAA era was defined as ≥2014. In the pre-DAA era, HCV+ female recipients had greater risk for graft failure compared with HCV+ male (hazard ratio [HR], 1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.11; P = 0.03) and HCV- female (HR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.43-1.60; P < 0.001) recipients. In the post-DAA era, HCV+ female recipients had lower risk for graft failure compared with HCV+ male recipients (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.70-0.97; P = 0.02) and equivalent outcomes to HCV- female recipients. HCV+ female recipients with graft failure had increased likelihood of graft failure due to disease recurrence compared with HCV+ male recipients in the pre-DAA era (odds ratio, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.08-1.39; P = 0.001) but not in the post-DAA era. Although historically HCV+ female recipients were at disproportionately increased risk for graft failure and disease recurrence, this disparity has been eliminated in the DAA era.

Changing Trends of Cirrhotic and Noncirrhotic Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the Era of Directly-Acting Antiviral Agents.

INTRODUCTION:The impact of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) for hepatitis C virus (HCV) on burden of cirrhotic and noncirrhotic hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has not been examined. We assessed recent trends in liver disease etiologies of HCC and proportion of noncirrhotic HCC since DAAs introduction.METHODS:Clinical characteristics including presence or absence of underlying cirrhosis were collected from 2,623 patients diagnosed with HCC between 2009 and 2019 at 2 large US centers. Logistic regression was performed to investigate the annual trends of HCC due to different liver diseases and proportions of noncirrhotic cases.RESULTS:In the DAA era (2014–2019), annual decline in HCV-HCC (odds ratio [OR] = 0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.88–0.99, P = 0.019), without change in trends of other liver diseases–related HCC, was observed. Annual increase in noncirrhotic HCC (OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.03–1.23, P = 0.009) and decline in cirrhotic HCC (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.81–0.97, P = 0.009) along with similar trends for HCV-HCC—increase in noncirrhotic cases (OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.08–1.69, P = 0.009) and decrease in cirrhotic cases (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.86–0.98, P = 0.012)—were observed during the DAA era. Compared with the pre-DAA era, HCC resection rate increased (10.7% vs 14.0%, P = 0.013) whereas liver transplantation rate decreased (15.1% vs 12.0%, P = 0.023) in the DAA era.DISCUSSION:Since introduction of DAAs, proportions of cirrhotic HCC have decreased, whereas proportions of noncirrhotic HCC have increased. These new trends were associated with change in utilization of liver resection and transplantation for HCC. The impact of changing patterns of DAA use on these trends will require further study.

All-cause hepatocellular carcinoma survival in the era of direct-acting antiviral therapy.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) cure with direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy improves survival in patients with HCV-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We hypothesized that HCV-HCC survival has increased in the DAA era, more than other aetiologies of HCC. We aimed to evaluate survival following HCC diagnosis in the pre-DAA and DAA eras, across each aetiology of HCC. Patients with HCC at three tertiary referral hospitals were included retrospectively (January 2008 to December 2019). Patients were categorized as HCV-HCC, hepatitis B virus (HBV)-HCC, or non-viral HCC. For each aetiology, the risk of death following incident HCC among patients diagnosed in the DAA era (2015-2019) was compared with patients diagnosed in the pre-DAA era (2008-2014). Among 1161 patients, there were 422 (36%) patients with HCV-HCC, 227 (20%) with HBV-HCC, and 512 (44%) with non-viral HCC. In adjusted analysis, the risk of death was lower in patients with HCV-HCC diagnosed in 2015-2019, compared with patients diagnosed in 2008-2014 (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.52-0.89; P=0.005). In contrast, there was no difference in the risk of death between time periods for patients with HBV-HCC (HR: 0.91; 95% CI: 0.64-1.29; P=0.602) or non-viral HCC on adjusted analysis (aHR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.74-1.15; P=0.476). Although patients with HBV-HCC had better survival compared with patients with HCV-HCC in 2008-2014 (aHR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.55-0.98; P=0.037), this difference disappeared in 2015-2019 (aHR: 1.26; 95% CI: 0.90-1.77; P=0.175). Hepatitis C virus-related HCC survival has increased in the DAA era, whereas adjusted survival remained stable for HBV-HCC and non-viral HCC.

Uptake of interferon-free DAA therapy among HCV-infected decompensated cirrhosis patients and evidence for decreased mortality.

Interferon-free DAA therapies have recently been licensed for patients infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) who have decompensated cirrhosis (DC). Our aim was to describe factors associated with uptake of IFN-free DAAs in DC patients and to compare mortality risk and hospital admission rates between pre-DAA and DAA eras. This observational study used record-linkage between Scotland's HCV Clinical Database and national inpatient hospitalization and mortality registers. For the DAA uptake analysis, the study population (n=297) was restricted to patients alive on 1November 2014, and Cox regression was used to estimate uptake associated with various covariates. For the Cox regression of mortality comparing pre-DAA and DAA eras, the study population (n=624) comprised those diagnosed with DC in 2005-2018; follow-up was censored at two years. DAA uptake was 63% overall and was significantly higher for treatment-experienced patients (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR)=1.64, 95% CI:1.14-2.34), genotype 1 vs. other genotypes (aHR=1.55. 95% CI:1.15-2.10) and lower for persons diagnosed with DC pre-2014 (0.47, 95% CI:0.33-0.68) and in Greater Glasgow (0.64, 95% CI:0.47-0.88). The intention-to-treat SVR rate was 89% (95% CI:83-93%). All-cause and liver-related mortality risk were significantly reduced among patients diagnosed with DC in the DAA era (November 2014-December 2018) compared with the pre-DAA era (2005-October 2014) (aHRs of 0.68, 95% CI:0.49-0.93; 0.69, 95% CI:0.50-0.95, respectively); in contrast, hospital admission rates were higher in the DAA era (aRR=1.14, 95% CI:1.04-1.26). The majority of HCV-infected DC patients engaged with specialist services can be treated with IFN-free DAAs. Improved survival among patients diagnosed with DC in the DAA era supports the beneficial impact of IFN-free therapies among those with advanced liver disease.

"Raising HOPE": Improved Outcomes for HIV/HCV-coinfected Liver Transplant Recipients in the Direct-acting Antiviral Era.

Background.The 2013 HIV Organ Policy Equity Act has increased liver transplantation (LT) in HIV+ patients; however, transplant centers may remain reluctant to perform LT in HIV/hepatitis C virus (HCV)-coinfected patients due to inferior outcomes. We aimed to assess how direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) have impacted HIV+/HCV+-coinfected LT recipient outcomes.Methods.national data including 70 125 adult LT recipients between 2008 and 2019 were analyzed. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards model were used to analyze outcomes.Results.LT for HIV+ individuals increased in the DAA era from 28 in 2014 to 64 in 2019 (23 had HIV+/HCV+ coinfection). In the pre-DAA era, HIV+/HCV+-coinfected LT recipients had an increased risk of graft failure compared with HIV−/HCV−-uninfected LT recipients (hazard ratio [HR], 1.85; P < 0.001). In contrast, there was no difference in graft failure between HIV+/HCV+-coinfected versus HIV−/HCV−-uninfected LT recipients in the DAA era (HR, 1.24; P = 0.308). Among coinfected LT recipients in the DAA era, 1- and 3-y cumulative graft survivals were 88.6% and 81.7% compared with 76.3% and 58.0% in the pre-DAA era, respectively (P = 0.006). In Cox analysis, HCV coinfection was not associated with graft failure (HR, 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 0.53-1.89) among HIV+ LT recipients in the DAA era (n = 271). Black and Hispanic populations accounted for almost half of HIV+/HCV+ LTs in the DAA era.Conclusions.HIV+/HCV+-coinfected LT recipient outcomes have improved significantly in the DAA era. Our results should offer reassurance to transplant centers and encourage timely transplantation referral of HIV patients with decompensated cirrhosis, including patients coinfected with HCV.

A population-based US study of hepatitis C diagnosis rate.

Underdiagnosis of HCV infection may hinder the obtainment of 2030 elimination goal. To estimate the pre-DAA HCV diagnosis rate to inform future public health effort. Data were obtained from three nationwide databases (Truven Health MarketScan Research Database 2007-2014, US Census Bureau 2012-2016 and NHANES 2007-2014). HCV diagnosis was defined with either one inpatient or two outpatient HCV International Classification of Disease 9 codes, providing the number of patients with diagnosed HCV (Truven). US Census Bureau data were used for age- and sex-standardization. We derived the total (diagnosed and undiagnosed) HCV infection using the NHANES database. To determine the rate and number of undiagnosed HCV, we subtracted diagnosed HCV burden (Truven) from the total HCV burden (NHANES). Of the 198 073 302 privately insured Americans, 1.49% (2 951 490 persons) had HCV infection. However, only 362 672 (12.29%) persons were diagnosed with HCV, leaving 2 588 818 (87.71%) undiagnosed. About two-third (68.04%) and one-third (33.04%) of diagnosed HCV patients had HCV RNA or genotype tests overall, with even lower rates for the ≥65 age group, respectively. In the pre-DAA era, only 12% of insured Americans with HCV were diagnosed. While this grim statistic is expected to rise, much more effort is needed to enhance the HCV care cascade.

Treatment of Hepatitis C Post-Liver Transplantation Could Mitigate Discard Rates of Hepatitis C-Positive Deceased Donor Livers and Expand the Donor Pool.

Background Prior to 2014, treatment for hepatitis C was limited. However, the subsequent introduction of direct acting antiviral medications (DAA) against hepatitis C led to improvements in morbidity and better medication tolerance. DAA therapy allowed for an increase in treatment rates of hepatitis C in patients on the liver transplant waiting list. With the popularization of DAA, there became a growing concern about the utility of hepatitis C-positive (HCV+) deceased liver donors, especially after treating HCV+ potential recipients on the transplant waiting list. Methods This is a retrospective, observational study using Mid-America Transplant Services (MTS) database from 2008 to 2017. Comparison was made before the widespread use of DAAs 2008–2013 (pre-DAA) against their common practice use 2014–2017 (post-DAA). All deceased liver donors with HCV antibody or nucleic acid positive results were evaluated. Results Between 2008 and 2017, 96 deceased liver donors were positive for HCV. In the pre-DAA era, 47 deceased liver donors were positive for HCV, of which 32 (68.1%) were transplanted and 15 (31.9%) were discarded. In the post-DAA era, a total of 49 HCV+ organs were identified, out of which 43 (87.8%) livers were transplanted and 6 (12.2%) were discarded. Discard rate was significantly higher in the pre-DAA population (31.9% vs. 12.2%, p = 0.026). Secondary analysis showed a distinct trend towards increased regional sharing and utilization of HCV+ donors. Conclusion In order to reduce discard rates of HCV+ patients, our data suggest that transplant centers could potentially delay HCV treatment in patients on the transplant waitlist.

Changing Population of Liver Transplant Recipients in the Era of Direct-acting Antiviral Therapy.

Background and Aims: With the availability of direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and changing liver disease etiology for liver transplantation (LT), data on the changes in LT recipient population in the DAA era are scanty.Methods: The United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) registry (01/2007 to 06/2018) was used to develop a retrospective cohort of LT recipients for HCV, alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD), and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). LT recipients in the DAA era (2013-2018) were compared with those in the pre-DAA era (2007-2012) era for recipient characteristics. Chi-square and analysis of variance were the statistical tests used for categorical and continuous variables, respectively.Results: Of 40,309 LT recipients (21,110 HCV, 7586 NASH, and 11,713 ALD), the 21,790 in the DAA era (9432 HCV, 7240 ALD, and 5118 NASH) were more likely to be older, female, obese, diabetic, have acute-on-chronic liver failure with a higher model for end-stage liver disease score, receive grafts with a lower donor risk index, and have waited on the LT list for a shorter period compared with their pre-DAA era counterparts. Specific to ALD, LT recipients with alcohol hepatitis were more likely to be younger at the time of LT. Of 9895 LT recipients with hepatocellular carcinoma, recipients in the DAA era were observed to have a higher proportion of HCV (43% vs. 32%, p<0.001), a lower proportion of ALD (9% vs. 12%, p<0.001), and no change for NASH (13% vs. 13%, p=0.9) compared with the pre-DAA era. Within the hepatocellular carcinoma population, LT recipients in the DAA era were older, diabetic, and waited on the LT list longer compared with their pre-DAA counterparts.Conclusions: Along with changing liver disease etiology in the DAA era, the LT recipient population demographics, comorbidities, liver disease severity, and graft quality are changing. These changes are relevant for future studies, immunosuppression, and post-transplant follow-up.

Population impact of direct-acting antiviral treatment on new presentations of hepatitis C-related decompensated cirrhosis: a national record-linkage study

ObjectivePopulation-based studies demonstrating the clinical impact of interferon-free direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapies are lacking. We examined the impact of the introduction of DAAs on HCV-related decompensated cirrhosis (DC) through analysis...

Lower Likelihood of Post-transplant Graft Failure, Death, and Retransplantation in the Era of Direct-Acting Antivirals

Direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) are expected to improve outcomes for patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection after liver transplantation (LT). We aim to evaluate trends in post-LT outcomes with availability of DAAs. We retrospectively evaluated USadults transplanted from January 1, 2002, to March 31, 2018, using the United Network for Organ Sharing Registry, stratified by pre-DAA (January 1, 2002- to December 31, 2013) vs. post-DAA (January 1, 2014-, to March 31, 2018) eras. Adjusted multivariate Cox regression analyses and competing risk models evaluated likelihood of graft failure, death, and retransplantation (re-LT). Among 97,147 patients, 30.2% had HCV infection and 19.4% had hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Of all patients, 31.9% experienced graft failure, 27.1% died after LT, and 4.7% underwent re-LT. The post-DAA era experienced lower likelihood of graft failure (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.69, p<0.001). Although patients with HCV infection (HR = 1.18, p < 0.001) and HCC (HR = 1.11, p < 0.001) had higher likelihood of graft failure in the pre-DAA era, no differences were seen in the post-DAA era. Although patients with HCV infection (HR = 1.20, p < 0.001) and HCC (HR = 1.17, p<0.001) had higher likelihood of death after LT in the pre-DAA era, no differences were seen in the post-DAA era. The post-DAA era had lower likelihood of post-LT death when stratified by non-HCC (HR = 0.70, p < 0.001) and HCC cohorts (HR = 0.67, p < 0.001) or by non-HCV (HR = 0.73, p < 0.001) and HCV (HR = 0.58, p < 0.001) cohorts. Although patients with HCV infection and HCC had higher risk of post-LT graft failure and death in the pre-DAA era, the disparity disappeared in the post-DAA era independently of each other. This likely reflects impact of DAAs on improving post-LT outcomes among patients with HCV infection and improved selection of patients with HCC for LT after 2014.

Effect of Recipient Hepatitis C Status on Outcomes of Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection has been deemed detrimental to kidney transplantation (KT) outcomes. Breakthrough HCV treatment with direct-acting antiviral (DAA) medications improved the probability of HCV+ kidney use for KT even in noninfected (HCV-) recipients. We hypothesized that recipient HCV infection influences deceased donor KT outcomes, and this effect could be modified by donor HCV status and use of DAAs. We conducted a retrospective cohort study based on data from the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network as of September 2018. A mate kidneys analysis was performed with HCV+ and HCV- recipients of solitary adult KT from ABO-compatible deceased donor between January 1994 and June 2018. We selected donors where 1 KT recipient was HCV+ and the mate kidney recipient was HCV-. Both HCV- and HCV+ donors were identified and analyzed separately. Outcomes, including survival of patients, grafts, and death-censored grafts, were compared between the groups. Four-hundred and twenty-five HCV+ and 5,575 HCV- donor mate kidneys were transplanted in HCV-discrepant recipients. HCV+ recipients of HCV- donor had worse patient and graft survival (adjusted hazard ratio 1.28; 95% CI, 1.19 to 1.37 and adjusted hazard ratio 1.26; 95% CI 1.18 to 1.34, respectively) and death-censored grafts (adjusted hazard ratio 1.24; 95% CI, 1.15 to 1.34) compared with HCV- recipients. Comparable patient and graft survival and death-censored grafts were found in recipients of HCV+ donors, regardless of recipient HCV status. The risk associated with HCV positivity in donors or recipients in the pre-DAA era (before December 2013) was no longer statistically significant in the post-DAA era. Given comparable outcomes between HCV+ and HCV- recipients in post-DAA era or when receiving HCV+ donor kidneys, broader use of HCV+ kidneys regardless of the recipient's HCV status should be advocated, and allocation algorithm for HCV+ kidneys should be revised.