Ability Of pRB Research Articles

Autochthonous tumors driven by Rb1 loss have an ongoing requirement for the RBP2 histone demethylase

Inactivation of the retinoblastoma gene (RB1) product, pRB, is common in many human cancers. Targeting downstream effectors of pRB that are central to tumorigenesis is a promising strategy to block the growth of tumors harboring loss-of-function RB1 mutations. One such effector is retinoblastoma-binding protein 2 (RBP2, also called JARID1A or KDM5A), which encodes an H3K4 demethylase. Binding of pRB to RBP2 has been linked to the ability of pRB to promote senescence and differentiation. Importantly, genetic ablation of RBP2 is sufficient to phenocopy pRB's ability to induce these cellular changes in cell culture experiments. Moreover, germline Rbp2 deletion significantly impedes tumorigenesis in Rb1+/- mice. The value of RBP2 as a therapeutic target in cancer, however, hinges on whether loss of RBP2 could block the growth of established tumors as opposed to simply delaying their onset. Here we show that conditional, systemic ablation of RBP2 in tumor-bearing Rb1+/- mice is sufficient to slow tumor growth and significantly extend survival without causing obvious toxicity to the host. These findings show that established Rb1-null tumors require RBP2 for growth and further credential RBP2 as a therapeutic target in human cancers driven by RB1 inactivation.

A kinase shRNA screen links LATS2 and the pRB tumor suppressor

pRB-mediated inhibition of cell proliferation is a complex process that depends on the action of many proteins. However, little is known about the specific pathways that cooperate with the Retinoblastoma protein (pRB) and the variables that influence pRB's ability to arrest tumor cells. Here we describe two shRNA screens that identify kinases that are important for pRB to suppress cell proliferation and pRB-mediated induction of senescence markers. The results reveal an unexpected effect of LATS2, a component of the Hippo pathway, on pRB-induced phenotypes. Partial knockdown of LATS2 strongly suppresses some pRB-induced senescence markers. Further analysis shows that LATS2 cooperates with pRB to promote the silencing of E2F target genes, and that reduced levels of LATS2 lead to defects in the assembly of DREAM (DP, RB [retinoblastoma], E2F, and MuvB) repressor complexes at E2F-regulated promoters. Kinase assays show that LATS2 can phosphorylate DYRK1A, and that it enhances the ability of DYRK1A to phosphorylate the DREAM subunit LIN52. Intriguingly, the LATS2 locus is physically linked with RB1 on 13q, and this region frequently displays loss of heterozygosity in human cancers. Our results reveal a functional connection between the pRB and Hippo tumor suppressor pathways, and suggest that low levels of LATS2 may undermine the ability of pRB to induce a permanent cell cycle arrest in tumor cells.

Rb regulates fate choice and lineage commitment in vivo

Mutation of the RB-1 tumour suppressor occurs in one third of all human tumours and is particularly associated with retinoblastoma and osteosarcoma1. Numerous functions have been ascribed to the product of the human RB-1 gene, pRB. The best known is pRB’s ability to promote cell cycle exit through inhibition of the E2F transcription factors and the transcriptional repression of genes encoding cell cycle regulators1. In addition, pRB has been shown in vitro to regulate several transcription factors that are master differentiation inducers2. Depending on the differentiation factor and cellular context, pRB can either suppress or promote their transcriptional activity. For example, pRB binds to Runx2 and potentiates its ability to promote osteogenic differentiation program in vitro3. In contrast, pRB acts together with E2F to suppress PPARγ, the master activator of adipogenesis4,5. Since osteoblasts and adipocytes can both arise from mesenchymal stem cells, these observations suggest that pRB might play a role in the choice between these two fates. However, to date, there is no evidence for this in vivo. Here we use mouse models to address this hypothesis in the context of mesenchymal tissue development and tumorigenesis. Our data show that Rb status plays a key role in establishing fate choice between bone and brown adipose tissue in vivo.

Mitotic chromosome condensation mediated by the retinoblastoma protein is tumor-suppressive

Condensation and segregation of mitotic chromosomes is a critical process for cellular propagation, and, in mammals, mitotic errors can contribute to the pathogenesis of cancer. In this report, we demonstrate that the retinoblastoma protein (pRB), a well-known regulator of progression through the G1 phase of the cell cycle, plays a critical role in mitotic chromosome condensation that is independent of G1-to-S-phase regulation. Using gene targeted mutant mice, we studied this aspect of pRB function in isolation, and demonstrate that it is an essential part of pRB-mediated tumor suppression. Cancer-prone Trp53(-/-) mice succumb to more aggressive forms of cancer when pRB's ability to condense chromosomes is compromised. Furthermore, we demonstrate that defective mitotic chromosome structure caused by mutant pRB accelerates loss of heterozygosity, leading to earlier tumor formation in Trp53(+/-) mice. These data reveal a new mechanism of tumor suppression, facilitated by pRB, in which genome stability is maintained by proper condensation of mitotic chromosomes.

INVESTIGATING THE ROLE AND REGULATION OF THE SPECIFIC ANDGENERAL PRB-E2F1 INTERACTIONS

Background/Purpose. The retinoblastoma tumor suppressor protein (pRB) plays a central role in proliferative control and is a frequent target for inactivation in cancer. The G1-Sphase transition of the cell cycle is regulated by pRB, which is capable of interacting with E2F family members and inhibiting the transcription of genesrequired to progress into S-phase. E2F1 is unique from other E2F family members as it can induce both apoptosis and proliferation. To control these contrasting functions of E2F1, a second E2F1 binding site exists in the C-terminus of pRB that can control apoptosis separately from proliferation. This anti-apoptotic function of pRBcan in some circumstances promote tumorigenesis, which leads to the question; is pRB a tumor suppressor or an oncogene? Methods. To investigate this, a gene-targeted mouse model is being engineered to selectively disrupt the ability of pRB to control proliferation through the general E2F binding site while still retaining the ability tocontrol apoptosis through the specific E2F1 site. Results. A series of novel mutants were engineered to selectively disrupt the binding of E2Fs at the general site, and prevent pRB from controlling proliferation. The mutants retain the ability to bind E2F1 and control apoptosis through thespecific binding site, which is not disrupted. Conclusions. By separating the ability of pRB to control proliferation and apoptosis under in vivo conditions, a better understanding into the significance of these two functions in development and tumorigenesis can be gained.

The retinoblastoma protein regulates pericentric heterochromatin.

The retinoblastoma protein (pRb) has been proposed to regulate cell cycle progression in part through its ability to interact with enzymes that modify histone tails and create a repressed chromatin structure. We created a mutation in the murine Rb1 gene that disrupted pRb's ability to interact with these enzymes to determine if it affected cell cycle control. Here, we show that loss of this interaction slows progression through mitosis and causes aneuploidy. Our experiments reveal that while the LXCXE binding site mutation does not disrupt pRb's interaction with the Suv4-20h histone methyltransferases, it dramatically reduces H4-K20 trimethylation in pericentric heterochromatin. Disruption of heterochromatin structure in this chromosomal region leads to centromere fusions, chromosome missegregation, and genomic instability. These results demonstrate the surprising finding that pRb uses the LXCXE binding cleft to control chromatin structure for the regulation of events beyond the G(1)-to-S-phase transition.

Binding of pRB to the PHD Protein RBP2 Promotes Cellular Differentiation

pRB can enforce a G1 block by repressing E2F-responsive promoters. It also coactivates certain non-E2F transcription factors and promotes differentiation. Some pRB variants activate transcription and promote differentiation despite impaired E2F binding and transcriptional repression capabilities. We identified RBP2 in a screen for proteins that bind to such pRB variants. RBP2 resembles other chromatin-associated transcriptional regulators and RBP2 binding tracked with pRB's ability to activate transcription and promote differentiation. RBP2 and pRB colocalize and pRB/RBP2 complexes were detected in chromatin isolated from differentiating cells. RBP2 siRNA phenocopied restoration of pRB function in coactivation and differentiation assays, suggesting that pRB prevents RBP2 from repressing genes required for differentiation. In addition, two bromodomain-containing proteins were identified as RBP2 targets that are transcriptionally activated by pRB in an RBP2-dependent manner. Our results suggest that promotion of differentiation by pRB involves neutralization of free RBP2 and transcriptional activation of RBP2 targets linked to euchromatin maintenance.

PRB phosphorylation mutants reveal role of pRB in regulating S phase completion by a mechanism independent of E2F.

Progression of cells into S phase is controlled by the retinoblastoma protein (pRB) and relies on the functional inactivation of this tumour suppressor in late G1 via protein phosphorylation. We provide evidence here that, besides controlling entry of cells into S phase, pRB can operate to inhibit S phase completion. Differential arrays of phosphorylation appear to regulate these different events, suggesting that cycle progression at these two stages of the cell cycle may be achieved via activation of distinct downstream pRB effector pathways. In agreement with this hypothesis, pRB's ability to prevent S phase entry, but not its ability to inhibit S phase completion, correlates with repression of E2F-regulated promoters. Furthermore, ectopic expression of E2F or the E2F-regulated cyclin E gene promote S phase entry in cells expressing phosphorylation-defective pRB but neither is sufficient to trigger completion of S phase. Our findings raise the possibility that pRB, in addition to its well-established role in controlling a checkpoint in late G1, could be involved in the control of a further checkpoint operating during S phase and that implementation of this checkpoint relies on an as yet unidentified pRB effector distinct from E2F.

Control of pRB phosphorylation

Two opposing enzymatic reactions control the activity of the retinoblastoma tumour suppressor protein, pRB. Phosphorylation inactivates pRB's ability to sequester miscellaneous cellular proteins, mostly involved in regulating gene transcription, whereas pRB dephosphorylation restores this ability. For some time now it has been suspected that members of the cyclin/cyclin-dependent kinase (cyclin/cdk) family mediate pRB inactivation. Recent results indicate that pRB phosphorylation is not executed by a single kinase but by a combination of cyclin/cdks, each one phosphorylating a subset of pRB's phosphorylation sites. The different kinases appear to be activated by growth factors through distinct signal transduction pathways. This lends itself to an attractive model whereby pRB phosphorylation may constitute an integration point for these signalling pathways, perhaps allowing cell cycle progression only when concurrent activation of these signalling pathways has been achieved.

The retinoblastoma protein pathway and the restriction point

The emerging role of the retinoblastoma protein (pRb) as a major controller of the restriction point has been supported by recent discoveries, including pRb's ability to repress gene transcription by all three RNA polymerases, which suggests a link between DNA replication and cell growth. Convergent genetic and biochemical data provide new insights into the molecular events that are upstream of, at, and downstream of pRb phosphorylation, which is regulated by G 1-phase cyclins and cyclin-dependent kinases (Cdks) and their inhibitors (CKIs). Major advances have also been made in our understanding of a key role of the pathway involving cyclin D, Cdks, CKIs, pRb and E2F both in commitment to traversing the cell cycle and in restraining oncogenesis.

Protein domains governing interactions between E2F, the retinoblastoma gene product, and human papillomavirus type 16 E7 protein.

Human papillomaviruses (HPVs) are the etiological agents for genital warts and contribute to the development of cervical cancer in humans. The HPV E7 gene product is expressed in these diseases, and the E7 genes from HPV types 16 and 18 contribute to transformation in mammalian cells. Mutation and deletion analysis of this gene suggests that the transforming activity of the protein product resides in the same domain as that which is directly involved in complex formation with the retinoblastoma gene product (pRB). This domain is one of two conserved regions (designated CRI and CRII) shared by E7 and other viral oncoproteins which bind pRB, including adenovirus E1A protein. Binding of HPV type 16 E7 protein to pRB has previously been shown to affect pRB's ability to bind DNA and to form complexes with other cellular proteins. In the current study, we map the functional interaction between E7 protein and pRB by monitoring the association between a 60-kDa version of the pRB, pRB60, and the cellular transcription factor E2F. We observe that CRII of E7 (amino acids 20 to 29), which completely blocks binding of full-length E7 protein, is necessary but not sufficient to inhibit E2F/pRB60 complex formation. While CRI of E1A (amino acids 37 to 55) appears to be sufficient to compete with E2F for binding to pRB60, the equivalent region of E7 is neither necessary nor sufficient. Only E7 fragments that contained both CRII and at least a portion of the zinc-binding domain (amino acids 60 to 98) inhibited E2F/pRB60 complex formation. These results suggest that pRB60 associates with E7 and E2F through overlapping but distinct domains.

Protein domains governing interactions between E2F, the retinoblastoma gene product, and human papillomavirus type 16 E7 protein.

Human papillomaviruses (HPVs) are the etiological agents for genital warts and contribute to the development of cervical cancer in humans. The HPV E7 gene product is expressed in these diseases, and the E7 genes from HPV types 16 and 18 contribute to transformation in mammalian cells. Mutation and deletion analysis of this gene suggests that the transforming activity of the protein product resides in the same domain as that which is directly involved in complex formation with the retinoblastoma gene product (pRB). This domain is one of two conserved regions (designated CRI and CRII) shared by E7 and other viral oncoproteins which bind pRB, including adenovirus E1A protein. Binding of HPV type 16 E7 protein to pRB has previously been shown to affect pRB's ability to bind DNA and to form complexes with other cellular proteins. In the current study, we map the functional interaction between E7 protein and pRB by monitoring the association between a 60-kDa version of the pRB, pRB60, and the cellular transcription factor E2F. We observe that CRII of E7 (amino acids 20 to 29), which completely blocks binding of full-length E7 protein, is necessary but not sufficient to inhibit E2F/pRB60 complex formation. While CRI of E1A (amino acids 37 to 55) appears to be sufficient to compete with E2F for binding to pRB60, the equivalent region of E7 is neither necessary nor sufficient. Only E7 fragments that contained both CRII and at least a portion of the zinc-binding domain (amino acids 60 to 98) inhibited E2F/pRB60 complex formation. These results suggest that pRB60 associates with E7 and E2F through overlapping but distinct domains.