We examined the effects of patagial tags on common eiders (Somateria mollissima) by comparing laying date, clutch size, and egg size of the same females in 2 breeding seasons, before tagging (1987) and after the birds had carried tags for 1 year (1988). Similar data were obtained from unmarked birds used as controls in both years. Clutch size of tagged birds did not differ from controls (P > 0.05), but tagged birds laid eggs later (P < 0.001) and produced smaller eggs (P < 0.05) in 1988 than in 1987. The egg size of control females was larger (P < 0.001) during 1988. We suggest that patagial tags affect a female's ability to accumulate body reserves before breeding by decreasing feeding time, increasing preening activity, and/ or increasing energy costs of diving. J. WILDL. MANAGE. 54(2):216-218 Recognizing individual birds is necessary in behavioral studies of waterfowl. Colored leg bands are not useful because they are rarely visible. Since Anderson (1963) described patagial tags, they have been commonly used in studies of behavior and movements of individual waterfowl and other birds (Marion and Shamis 1977). The advantages of patagial tags are high visibility and long retention (Southern 1971, Marion and Shamis 1977, Kochert et al. 1983). However, several researchers reported detrimental effects of patagial tags. For example, skin and feather abrasion occurred in prairie falcons (Falco mexicanus) (Kochert et al. 1983), herring gulls (Larus argentatus) (Mudge and Fern 1978), and ring-billed gulls (L. delawarensis) (Southern 1971). In ring-billed gulls, tags also interfered with pairing, delayed arrival at the colony, and postponed hatching (Southern and Southern 1985). Mortality rates of American kestrels (Falco sparverius) (Bolen and Dreden 1980) and willets (Catoptrophorus semipalmatus) (Howe 1980) possibly increased as a result of tagging. Szymczak and Ringelman (1986) reported changes in habitat use by wing-tagged mallards (Anas platyrhynchos) that resulted in increased mortality from hunting. Patagial tags have been used in several studies of common eiders (e.g., Gorman and Milne 1972, Munro and Bedard 1977, Schmutz et al. 1982), but only Anderson (1963) reported the possible effects of these markers. We evaluated the effects of patagial tags on common eiders by comparing laying date, clutch size, and egg size of individuals in the breeding season before they were marked with that of the same birds after they had carried patagial tags for 1 year. During both seasons, we also obtained similar data on control birds, which were either legbanded or not marked at all. We thank T. B. Moum, H. S. Ludvigsen, J. H. Heggas, F. Rikardsen, and H. M. Iversen for help in the field, and D. G. Jorde, R. T. Barrett, and W. Vader for reviewing the manuscript. We also thank R. T. Barrett and J. Marks for correcting the English. Funding was by grants from the Nansen Foundation and The Wildlife Fund, Troms County (to KEE). STUDY AREA AND METHODS The fieldwork was conducted at an eider colony (about 400 breeding pairs) on Grindoya, a small island (0.65 km2) near Tromso, northern Norway (69040'N, 18015'E) in 1987 and 1988. The island is covered by a mixture of woodland (50%), heaths, bogs, and fens. The dominant tree was mountain birch (Betula pubescens) with lower canopies of common juniper (Juniperus communis), willow (Salix spp.), crowberry (Empetrum hermaphroditum), and blueberry (Vaccinium myrtillus). Egg laying started in mid-May, and most of the birds left the colony in late June. We searched the island for nests at the start of the breeding season, and we used a hand net to catch females on their nests during late incubation. In 1987, 84 females were caught and marked with numbered patagial tags and steel leg bands. Patagial tags were 0.8 x 60.0 x 40.0 mm Darvic, PVC plastic. Tags were attached using a 30-mm nylon pin through the patagial membrane and a 10-mm nylon washer in each end and were fixed in position by melting the nylon pin. Of 84 marked females, 25 were found on a
Read full abstract