Preferences Of Practitioners Research Articles

Medical Professionals and Pharmacological Intervention for the Treatment of Insomnia: A Cross-Sectional Study

Abstract Objective To explore the preferences of medical practitioners concerning various medications and other remedies to manage insomnia, and to ascertain whether these preferences are associated with their respective medical specialties. Materials and Methods Employing the snowball sampling technique, we administered two versions of a questionnaire to an international group of medical professionals, including trainees and specialists from diverse medical backgrounds. Results Zopiclone, zolpidem, and mirtazapine were evaluated as the most effective treatments for insomnia, while physicians would typically avoid using other tricyclic antidepressants, dual orexin receptor antagonists, and tryptophan for insomnia treatment. Noteworthy statistical correlations between physicians' specialty and preferred drug therapy, were observed in three out of five cases: 1) first-line drug treatment for short-term intervention against insomnia; (2) second-line treatment for long-term intervention; and 3) cases involving the elderly. Discussion Psychiatrists demonstrated a greater preference for antipsychotics and antidepressants for the treatment of insomnia compared with other physicians. Conversely, other medical professionals exhibited a preference for benzodiazepines and Z-drugs (zopiclone and zolpidem). Although Z-drugs were evaluated as the most effective in the treatment of insomnia, in the clinical practice, physicians administer or would administer antidepressant or antipsychotic drugs more often (mirtazapine and quetiapine respectively). Regarding Dual Orexin Receptor Antagonists (DORAs), the high prevalence of “Do not know/No opinion” answers implies that our sample was not familiar with this innovative treatment.

Standard Method for Oral Health Education (OHE) Among Dental Professionals—A Mixed Analysis Approach

ABSTRACT Aim: This study aims to identify and evaluate the methods of oral health education (OHE) used by dental professionals in Chennai, India. Materials and Method: A cross-sectional survey was performed among 357 dentists to assess the standard technique for providing OHE. A 15-item questionnaire consisting of demographic variables and preferred method of OHE was distributed to the participants as Google Form. The collected data were tabulated and analyzed using descriptive analysis and analysis of variance (ANOVA). Results: Most participants (63.4%) reported the lecture method as the standard technique for delivering OHE. Among the study participants, 80% employed OHE aids, predominantly models (33.2%), pamphlets (16.8%), and AV projections (16.5%). Conclusion: The lecture method predominates among dental professionals for its perceived effectiveness and versatility. These findings underscore the importance of tailored educational strategies in oral health promotion, informed by demographic considerations and practitioner preferences, to enhance public health outcomes globally.

An Online Survey on the Current Trends in Root Canal Treatment.

Root canal treatment in several regions of Saudi Arabia is commonly administered by general dental practitioners (GDPs) rather than specialized endodontists. The study aimed to compare the endodontic practices and preferences of general dental practitioners with those of endodontists and restorative specialists. A structured questionnaire including 23 questions focussing on fundamental principles and techniques used in contemporary root canal treatment was distributed online to 600 dentists who perform root canal treatments and are registered with the Saudi Dental Society (SDS). Data were gathered for basic demographic and professional details, practices, and preferences in endodontic materials and methods. The collected data were analyzed using SPSS version 21 (Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.). For selected variables, frequency distributions and 95% confidence interval for sample proportions were measured. Associations between categorical variables were examined using cross-tabulation, with statistical significance assessed by the chi-square test of homogeneity or Fisher's exact test when necessary. The survey, with a 59% response rate primarily from participants aged 24-34 years (94.1%) with one to five years of experience (90.4%), revealed that most GDPs referred root canal treatment (RCT)cases due to lack of skills (82.8%), performed restorability assessments (90.9%), preferred Cavit for tooth buildup (87%), consistently used rubber dam isolation (91.5%), treated mainly anterior teeth (91.2%) without magnification (87.9%), used electronic apex locators for working length determination (63.3%), favored stainless steel K files and single cone obturation, while specialists exhibited wider clinical experience, more frequent use of advanced techniques, and higher usage of intracanal medicaments (91.7%) and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) as irrigant (70.8%). The study provides valuable insights into the endodontic preferences and practices of dentists in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, revealing significant differences between general dental practitioners and specialists. The findings highlight critical areas for improvement, such as the need for enhanced training in endodontic skills and better access to modern materials and equipment.

Understanding general practitioner and pharmacist preferences for pharmacogenetic testing in primary care: a discrete choice experiment

Pharmacogenetic testing in the United Kingdom’s National Health Service (NHS) has historically been reactive in nature, undertaken in the context of single gene-drug relationships in specialist settings. Using a discrete choice experiment we aimed to identify healthcare professional preferences for development of a pharmacogenetic testing service in primary care in the NHS. Respondents, representing two professions groups (general practitioners or pharmacists), completed one of two survey versions, asking them to select their preferred pharmacogenetic testing service in the context of a presentation of low mood or joint pain. Responses from 235 individuals were included. All respondents preferred pharmacogenetic testing over no testing, though preference heterogeneity was identified. Both professional groups, but especially GPs, were highly sensitive to service design, with uptake varying depending on the service offered. This study demonstrates uptake of a pharmacogenetic testing service is impacted by service design and highlights key areas which should be prioritised within future initiatives.

A Survey of Preferences for Ceramic Materials on Tooth-Supported Crowns Among Dental Practitioners in Chile.

Purpose: To evaluate the preferences of dental practitioners for tooth-supported crowns dental ceramics by means of an online survey and to assess the influence of age, gender, years of experience, and dental specialty on those preferences. Materials and Methods: An anonymous questionnaire was delivered online through Google Surveys, targeting 796 dentists. It contained 17 dichotomous, closed questions with two sections. The first section dealt with general characteristics, including age, gender, years of experience, training in prosthodontics, and hours worked per week. The second section included questions regarding preferences of different materials for crowns, and the use of digital workflows. Analyses were carried out with Stata 14.0 software (StataCorp, TX, USA). A significance level of p=0.05 was adopted. Results: 248 surveys were answered. Practitioners in Chile preferred lithium disilicate for the anterior region (55.2%) but also for the posterior area (40.7%), regardless of their age, gender, years since graduation, hours worked per week or any training in prosthodontics. Chilean dentists over 50 years old considered zirconia almost 4 times more than those under 30 years old for anterior crowns (51.85%). 59.68% of dentists take digital impressions, and 37.10% have access to chairside CAD/CAM technology. In this group, 54.4% preferred feldspathic ceramic for anterior and 23.9% for posterior crowns. Conclusions: While there is a wide range of dental ceramic materials, these results provide a snapshot of the current trends in Chile where lithium disilicate is the most preferred ceramic material for tooth-supported crowns, and metal-ceramic is the least preferred material.

Consequences of age and education correction of cognitive screening tests - A simulation study of the MoCA test in Italy.

Cognitive screening tools are widely used in clinical practice to screen for age-related cognitive impairment and dementia. These tools' test scores are known to be influenced by age and education, leading to routine correction of raw scores for these factors. Despite these corrections being common practice, there is evidence suggesting that corrected scores may perform worse in terms of discrimination than raw scores. To address the ongoing debate in the field of dementia research, we assessed the impact of the corrections on discrimination, specificity, and sensitivity of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment test in Italy, both for the overall population and across age and education strata. We created a realistic model of the resident population in Italy in terms of age, education, cognitive impairment and test scores, and performed a simulation study. We confirmed that the discrimination performance was higher for raw scores than for corrected scores in discriminating patients with cognitive impairment from individuals without (areas under the curve of 0.947 and 0.923 respectively). With thresholds determined on the overall population, raw scores showed higher sensitivities for higher-risk age-education groups and higher specificities for lower-risk groups. Conversely, corrected scores showed uniform sensitivity and specificity across demographic strata, and thus better performance for certain age-education groups. Raw and corrected scores show different performances due to the underlying causal relationships between the variables. Each approach has advantages and disadvantages, the optimal choice between raw and corrected scores depends on the aims and preferences of practitioners and policymakers.

Research outcomes informing the selection of public health interventions and strategies to implement them: A cross-sectional survey of Australian policy-maker and practitioner preferences

BackgroundA key role of public health policy-makers and practitioners is to ensure beneficial interventions are implemented effectively enough to yield improvements in public health. The use of evidence to guide public health decision-making to achieve this is recommended. However, few studies have examined the relative value, as reported by policy-makers and practitioners, of different broad research outcomes (that is, measures of cost, acceptability, and effectiveness). To guide the conduct of research and better inform public health policy and practice, this study aimed at describing the research outcomes that Australian policy-makers and practitioners consider important for their decision-making when selecting: (a) public health interventions; (b) strategies to support their implementation; and (c) to assess the differences in research outcome preferences between policy-makers and practitioners.MethodAn online value-weighting survey was conducted with Australian public health policy-makers and practitioners working in the field of non-communicable disease prevention. Participants were presented with a list of research outcomes and were asked to select up to five they considered most critical to their decision-making. They then allocated 100 points across these – allocating more points to outcomes perceived as more important. Outcome lists were derived from a review and consolidation of evaluation and outcome frameworks in the fields of public health knowledge translation and implementation. We used descriptive statistics to report relative preferences overall and for policy-makers and practitioners separately.ResultsOf the 186 participants; 90 primarily identified as policy-makers and 96 as public health prevention practitioners. Overall, research outcomes of effectiveness, equity, feasibility, and sustainability were identified as the four most important outcomes when considering either interventions or strategies to implement them. Scores were similar for most outcomes between policy-makers and practitioners.ConclusionFor Australian policy-makers and practitioners working in the field of non-communicable disease prevention, outcomes related to effectiveness, equity, feasibility, and sustainability appear particularly important to their decisions about the interventions they select and the strategies they employ to implement them. The findings suggest researchers should seek to meet these information needs and prioritize the inclusion of such outcomes in their research and dissemination activities. The extent to which these outcomes are critical to informing the decision of policy-makers and practitioners working in other jurisdictions or contexts warrants further investigation.

What do we really know about vital pulp therapy?

Retrospective cohort study using STROBE cohort reporting guidelines. Patients from Mehr Dental Clinic in Tehran, Iran, who received different types of vital pulp therapy (VPT) by a single endodontist, due to carious pulpal exposure, between April 2011 and October 2022. These were: Full Pulpotomy (FP), Miniature Pulpotomy (MP) and Direct Pulp Capping (DPC). Data were accessed via the dental clinic's electronic database. Patients were deemed eligible if they had pulpal exposure due to caries, but not trauma. Pre-operative, immediate post-operative and at least one follow-up radiograph at a minimum 3-month interval were required. Demographic, diagnostic, and procedural data as well as informed consent were also required. Teeth with probing depths greater than 4 mm or pulpal necrosis were excluded. Patient, tooth and treatment factors were statistically analysed for an outcome of success or failure using a Cox proportional hazards model. Kaplan/Meier curves were used to establish the mean survival times. The Log-rank test was used to compare survival across the three treatment groups. The Omnibus test of model and the -2 log likelihood ratio (-2LL) were used to assess sensitivity and model fitness. Statistical analyses were determined using the IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows Version 21.0, with P value set at <0.05. 1257 VPTs from 1149 patients had complete data and were used in the analysis. 802 cases were excluded due to no follow up radiograph. The VPT cases were divided into FP (n = 272), MP (n = 217) and DPC (n = 768). The average follow up was 42.21 months, with an overall 116-month survival rate of 99.1% and success rate of 91.6%. FP had a mean survival time of 99.43 months; for MP it was 104.26 months; for DPC it was 102.27 months. There were no significant differences between these groups (P = 0.363). There were statistically significant correlations between symptomatic Irreversible Periodontitis (IP), radiographic signs of Apical Periodontitis (AP), restoration type, restoration surfaces and the outcome of VPT. This is one of the largest cohort studies of its kind, with over 1250 cases of various VPT techniques in 10 years. There was deviation from gold standard practice, with lack of rubber dam. A lack of haemostasis after 2 min could be construed as bacterially infected pulpal tissue and require further resection of pulp. Yet, these approaches still resulted in successful outcomes. Another interesting finding was that symptomatic IP with associated AP was treated with VPT, with a 78% success rate. Considering this study and other emerging evidence in the literature, application of VPT as an alternative to conventional Root Canal Treatment could be adopted in general practice, depending on the skills and knowledge of the practitioner and patient preferences.

Evaluation of factors affecting pharmacists and pharmacy technicians' satisfaction towards practicing CE activities in Saudi Arabia

BackgroundContinuing education (CE) is an essential requirement for pharmacy professionals to stay abreast with the evolving knowledge and skills of the practice and meet the regulatory mandate. The purpose of this research is to assess factors affecting the satisfaction of pharmacists and pharmacy technicians towards CE practices in Saudi Arabia. Material and methodsA self-administered survey instrument was developed following an extensive literature search. The questionnaire consisted of three sections: participants’ demographics, data on CE activities over the past year and overall satisfaction, and statements of barriers (14 items) and facilitators (12 items) for participation in CE activities (scored on a 5-point Likert scale (5 = always, 1 = never)). The survey was piloted and then distributed as a link through the Saudi Commission for Health Specialties and Saudi Pharmaceutical Society (SPS) between Jan 2018 and Feb 2019. ResultsData was available on 398 pharmacists and 40 pharmacy technicians (completion rate was 55 %). The majority were practitioners, male, working in a hospital setting and had more than five years of practice experience. Half of the participants were from the Central Region and about one-third were non-Saudi. Only a quarter of the participants were satisfied/very satisfied with the current CE practices in Saudi Arabia. Job constraints (62.7 %), cost (55.9 %), schedule of CE activities (55.4 %), lack of information on CE opportunities (53 %) and professional burnout (49.7 %) were the top barriers. There was a significant level of dissatisfaction among pharmacy technicians when compared to pharmacists (p = 0.003), as well as among Saudi pharmacists when compared to non-Saudi pharmacists (p = 0.002). Lack of relevant CE activities (p = 0.05), lack of quality activities (p = 0.002), lack of recognition (p = 0.013) and lack of internet access (p = 0.006) were significantly more barriers for pharmacy technicians compared to pharmacists. The most identified facilitators to engage in CE activities were a personal desire to learn (78.4 %), the requirement to maintain a professional license (73.8 %) and relaxation provided by learning (58.5 %) and networking opportunities (53.4 %). The majority of the participants preferred conferences or interactive workshops, short CE over half a day or less, and the topic of disease management/drug therapy. ConclusionThe findings of the study highlight the need for a partnership strategy that includes various stakeholders to improve CE program quality and accessibility that supports and promotes the professional development of pharmacists and pharmacy technicians in Saudi Arabia. It also underscores the importance of meeting the preferences of pharmacy practitioners when designing CE programs and aligning such activities with their practices.

Advancing social practice understandings of digital innovation delivery in construction project management

PurposeThe paper aims to apply social practice theory to clarify the process of innovation design and delivery from one successful digital innovation: the building information modelling (BIM) risk library. The paper clarifies the practices surrounding construction innovation and provides a schema useful for practitioners and technology designers through a social practice analysis.Design/methodology/approachThe paper applies Schatzki's “organisation of practice” concepts to a construction project innovation to clarify how the practice of innovation revolves around understandings, rules and teleoaffectivities (emotive behaviours). Sources for the study include notes from meetings, workshops with experts and the shared artefacts of innovation.FindingsThe practice of innovation design and delivery are clarified through a social practice analysis: a distinct “field of practice” and a “schema” of generalisable prescriptions and preferences for innovation delivery being presented.Practical implicationsThe paper informs the practice and process of innovation design and delivery; the insights clarify how collective understandings and rules of use evolve over time, becoming formalised into contracts, agreements and workplans. Practically, processes whereby innovation “sayings” evolve into innovation “doings” are clarified: a schema detailing prescriptions and preferences of practitioners and developers being presented.Originality/valueThe social practice analysis of one successful construction innovation is an original contribution to the body of knowledge, adding a level of detail regarding innovation design and delivery often missing from reported research.

Gaining prescription rights: a qualitative survey mapping the views of UK counselling and clinical psychologists

ABSTRACT Objective The British Psychological Society (BPS) has been exploring whether its practitioner members are interested in gaining prescription rights for psychiatric drugs and what such a privilege might look like. This qualitative study aimed to survey the views of UK-based, qualified counselling and clinical psychologists. Method: Qualitative data was collected from 82 participants via an online survey (37 counselling and 45 clinical psychologists). Along with the survey items, the last question asked participants to select one of three answers (yes/no/unsure) in relation to whether they supported prescription rights for psychologists. The qualitative data was analysed using thematic analysis, from a critical realist perspective, to develop 3 themes. Results Theme 1 explores how psychologists grapple with their professional identity within structures dominated by the medical model of distress, and constructions of the prescription rights debate as a crossroads for both discipline and profession. Theme 2 explores participants’ assumptions about psychiatric drugs as they seem to serve as a springboard to their views on prescription rights. Theme 3 examines the belief that gaining prescription rights will result in increased status and power for psychologists and what might be gained or lost as a result. Regarding the final question: 18 participants answered yes; 42 no; and 22 were unsure. Conclusion We advocate for increased criticality in how UK psychology continues to consider this issue. We caution against an optionality approach that might risk obscuring wider implications for psychology beyond the preferences of individual practitioners.

NAVIGATING DECARBONIZATION: EXAMINING SHIPPING COMPANIES’ FLEET MODERNIZATION STRATEGIES WORLDWIDE

The shipping industry's heavy reliance on fossil fuels has significantly contributed to global greenhouse gas emissions, necessitating urgent decarbonization measures. In this context, the trend towards environmentally friendly alternative fuels has accelerated and shipping companies has begun fleet modernization such as retrofitting vessels to accommodate alternative fuel systems or investing in new ships designed for specific alternative fuels. However, there are contradicting approaches in practice on viable option(s) to decarbonize. In this study, it is aimed to determine which strategies the shipping companies in fleet modernization mainly prefer. In this context, the current news under the title of "Shipping-Decarbonization" in the Thompson Reuters Refinitiv terminal has been scanned to seek answers about the direction in which the preferences of practitioners have evolved. Although there are different investment preferences, it has been determined that companies are predominantly investing in ships with methanol and LNG propulsion systems or retrofitting their existing fleets in this area on their decarbonization journey. Based on the analysis, this study aims to provide valuable insights for policymakers and industry stakeholders especially on identification of preferred alternative fuels in order to customize incentives and regulations aimed at encouraging the adoption of these particular alternative fuels

Setting clinically relevant thresholds for the notification of canine disease outbreaks to veterinary practitioners: an exploratory qualitative interview study.

The Small Animal Veterinary Surveillance Network (SAVSNET) has developed mathematical models to analyse the veterinary practice and diagnostic laboratory data to detect genuine outbreaks of canine disease in the United Kingdom. There are, however, no validated methods available to establish the clinical relevance of these genuine statistical outbreaks before their formal investigation is conducted. This study aimed to gain an actionable understanding of a veterinary practitioner's preferences regarding which outbreak scenarios have a substantial impact on veterinary practice for six priority canine diseases in the United Kingdom. An intensity sampling approach was followed to recruit veterinary practitioners according to their years of experience and the size of their practice. In-depth semi-structured and structured interviews were conducted to describe an outbreak notification and outbreak response thresholds for six canine endemic diseases, exotic diseases, and syndromes. These thresholds reflected participants' preferred balance between the levels of excess case incidence and predictive certainty of the detection system. Interviews were transcribed, and a thematic analysis was performed using NVivo 12. Seven interviews were completed. The findings indicate higher preferred levels of predictive certainty for endemic diseases than for exotic diseases, ranging from 95 to 99% and 80 to 90%, respectively. The levels of excess case incidence were considered clinically relevant at values representing an increase of two to four times in the normal case incidence expectancy for endemic agents, such as parvovirus, and where they indicated a single case in the practice's catchment area for exotic diseases such as leishmaniosis and babesiosis. This study's innovative methodology uses veterinary practitioners' opinions to inform the selection of a notification threshold value in real-world applications of stochastic canine outbreak detection models. The clinically relevant thresholds derived from participants' needs will be used by SAVSNET to inform its outbreak detection system and to improve its response to canine disease outbreaks in the United Kingdom.

Impact of airway devices and emergency airway techniques characteristics on airway adverse events in mainland China: a cross-sectional study.

Novel airway devices are becoming widely available, yet it is unclear whether the techniques or preferences of airway practitioners for airway management have been impacted. Given these facts, a cross-sectional study of the current status of airway management in mainland China was conducted and compared with previous survey findings. The national survey was conducted from November 7th to November 28th, 2022. An electronic survey was sent to the New Youth Anesthesia Forum to examine the availability of airway devices, preference for front-of-neck access (FONA) techniques, the incidence of adverse airway events, and the status of airway management training. Questionnaires were completed by 3783 respondents, with a response rate of 72.14%. So far, the availability of optical airway devices has improved dramatically, with the availability of videolaryngoscopes reaching 97.18%. When encountering "cannot intubate, cannot ventilate" (CICV) scenarios, the majority of respondents would prefer needle cricothyrotomy to establish FONA. However, less than a quarter of respondents had actually performed it. Moreover, the incidence of airway adverse events from 2016 to 2022 was 11.48%, of which 5.13% were brain damage or death. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the ability to perform FONA techniques (odds ratio [OR] 0.23, 95% CI: 0.16, 0.32; P<0.001) and the availability of difficult airway management carts or kits (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.41, 0.85; P=0.005) were associated with a lower incidence of airway adverse events. Optical airway devices can overcome some of the challenges posed by difficult airways, yet the CICV scenario remains a major obstacle. The future focus of airway management should be training, particularly for complicated emergency airway techniques.

General practitioner preferences for telehealth consultations in Australia: a pilot survey and discrete choice experiment.

To identify and quantify general practitioner (GP) preferences related to service attributes of clinical consultations, including telehealth consultations, in Australia. GPs have been increasingly using telehealth to deliver patient care since the onset of the 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. GP preferences for telehealth service models will play an important role in the uptake and sustainability of telehealth services post-pandemic. An online survey was used to ask GPs general telehealth questions and have them complete a discrete choice experiment (DCE). The DCE elicited GP preferences for various service attributes of telehealth (telephone and videoconference) consultations. The DCE investigated five service attributes, including consultation mode, consultation purpose, consultation length, quality of care and rapport, and patient co-payment. Participants were presented with eight choice sets, each containing three options to choose from. Descriptive statistics was used, and mixed logit models were used to estimate and analyse the DCE data. A total of 60 GPs fully completed the survey. Previous telehealth experiences impacted direct preferences towards telehealth consultations across clinical presentations, although in-person modes were generally favoured (in approximately 70% of all scenarios). The DCE results lacked statistical significance which demonstrated undiscernible differences between GP preferences for some service attributes. However, it was found that GPs prefer to provide a consultation with good quality care and rapport (P < 002). GPs would also prefer to provide care to their patients rather than decline a consultation due to consultation mode, length or purpose (P < 0.0001). Based on the findings, GPs value the ability to provide high-quality care and develop rapport during a clinical consultation. This highlights the importance of recognising value-based care for future policy reforms, to ensure continued adoption and sustainability of GP telehealth services in Australia.

What are the needs in oral antitumor therapy? An analysis of patients' and practitioners' preferences.

Since the European approval of CDK4/6 inhibitors in 2016, the treatment of patients with hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer has changed significantly. Compared with chemotherapy, endocrine-based therapy has different treatment regimens and is associated with new side effects. Oral therapy aims for optimal drug efficacy and long treatment times while maintaining maximum independence and quality of life resulting in the conservation of medical staff resources. A monocentric analysis of therapy preferences of practitioners (25 nurses and physicians) and patients (11 on endocrine monotherapy, 17 on endocrine-based therapy, and 14 on intravenous chemotherapy) was performed using specific questionnaires. Preferences were assessed using a four-point Likert scale or bidirectional response options. All patients were highly supportive of oral therapy (mean agreement score on the Likert scale 1.3, p < 0.001 vs. all other options) and a consultation interval of 4 weeks (2.0, p = 0.015 vs. 3 weeks). Practitioners also preferred oral therapy (1.4) and visits every 4 weeks (1.6). In general, patients on oral therapies reported higher compatibility of their therapy with daily life than patients on chemotherapy (1.6 and 1.7 vs. 2.6, p = 0.006). Outpatient oncology is the main source of information for all patients, mainly in case of side effects (2.0) and open questions (1.8). Regarding oral antitumor therapy regimens, patients do not show a significant preference for a specific regimen, while practitioners prefer a continuous regimen (1.6) over a 21/7 regimen (21 days on and 7 days off therapy, 2.5). Patients are likely to accept mild side effects (e.g., neutropenia, diarrhea, polyneuropathy, fatigue) and would still adhere to their initial choice of regimen (continuous or 21/7). Only when side effects occur with a severity of CTCAE grade 3 do patients prefer the regimen in which the side effects occur for a shorter period of time. Patients and practitioners prefer oral antitumor therapy-both continuous and 21/7 regimens-over other application forms. Patient education and proper therapy management, supported by additional tools, contribute to the specific management of side effects and high adherence. This allows quality of life to be maintained during long-term therapy with CDK4/6 inhibitors in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Practitioners preference in using electrotherapy to treat paediatric lower limb conditions: an online survey

Purpose Electrotherapies are commonly used to treat adult musculoskeletal pathologies. However, there is insufficient evidence supporting the use of electrotherapies for lower limb conditions in children. Currently, it is unknown how electrotherapies are used in paediatric clinical practice. This study aimed to investigate if practitioners use electrotherapy to treat children’s lower limb conditions, frequency and why. Materials and methods A custom-built online survey was disseminated via social media targeting international medical and healthcare practitioners who treat children with lower limb conditions using electrotherapy. Practitioners were asked if they did or did not use electrotherapies, and their reasons. Responses were described in frequencies and with thematic analysis. Results There were 445 practitioners who responded. From these, 301(68%) indicated they used electrotherapy, with the most frequently used being Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (n = 110). The most common reason cited for using electrotherapy was practitioner preference due to the alleged effectiveness of the chosen modality. The remaining 144 (32%) practitioners reported not using electrotherapy, the most common reason being lack of evidence. Conclusions We found that a majority of practitioners used electrotherapies on children. The reasons for using or not using electrotherapy were practitioner centred.

223P Patient and healthcare practitioner preferences for treatments in advanced renal cell carcinoma

223P Patient and healthcare practitioner preferences for treatments in advanced renal cell carcinoma

16P Patient and healthcare practitioner preferences in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer treatment: A discrete choice experiment

16P Patient and healthcare practitioner preferences in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer treatment: A discrete choice experiment

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society Guidelines for Gynecologic Oncology: Addressing Implementation Challenges - 2023 Update

ABSTRACT Implementation of the Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Society Guidelines in 2016 has resulted in an approximate decrease in hospital length of stay (LOS), reduction in complications and readmission, and cost saving. Recent publications however have demonstrated that barriers and gaps in understanding may result in many ERAS recommendations being poorly adhered to in gynecologic oncology patients. The aims of this second update to the ERAS Society Guidelines for gynecologic oncology is to summarize and update the evidence investigating specific implementation challenges to increase ERAS uptake and improve clinical outcomes for patients. A literature search was conducted for topics specified to 9 ERAS implementation challenges identified: perioperative oral intake safety, preoperative medication importance, penicillin allergies, intraoperative analgesia, how to manage urinary drainage, venous thromboembolism prophylaxis, postoperative opioid prescription practices, same-day discharge programs, and how can I overcome barriers to ERAS implementation. The quality of evidence and recommendations was evaluated, and recommendations graded as strong or weak based on quality, balance between desirable and undesirable effects on holistic clinical outcomes, and on values and preferences of practitioners. Regarding perioperative oral intake safety, patients should be encouraged to consume clear liquids in 2 hours before surgery and preoperative carbohydrate loading improves satisfaction and comfort. Optimal preoperative medications include nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, acetaminophen, and gabapentinoids. Patients with penicillin allergies should receive standard surgical antibiotic prophylaxis. For intraoperative analgesia, wound infiltration with local anesthetic and TAP block are preferred over thoracic epidural analgesia. Indwelling bladder catheters should be removed as early as possible in the postoperative period such as on the day of surgery for minimally invasive procedures and no later than postoperative day 1 for laparotomy. Patients at increased risk of venous thromboembolism should receive dual prophylaxis with compression and medications, and extended chemoprophylaxis should be prescribed to those with high-risk criteria or after laparotomy. Multimodal opioid-reduction is critical for all patients, and decreased postdischarge opioid proscribing is improved with a team approach and does not affect pain control or patient satisfaction. Patient controlled analgesia is a last resort for those requiring repeated treatment with intravenous opioids. Multidisciplinary same-day discharge programs should be considered in minimally invasive surgeries, and implementation requires a multidisciplinary team approach with patient education, case selection, and ERAS principles. Overcoming barriers to ERAS principles is more successful with changes at the management level and education. Communication of the economic benefits of ERAS to administrators may be a strong incentive to garner support. Although the evidence level varied between moderate and strong for each of these recommendations, the recommendation grade for each was strong. This updated ERAS guideline focuses on addressing implementation challenges and controversial aspects of ERAS defined by a stakeholder clinician group and offers suggestions based on objective data for overcoming these barriers.