What do we really know about vital pulp therapy?

Abstract

Retrospective cohort study using STROBE cohort reporting guidelines. Patients from Mehr Dental Clinic in Tehran, Iran, who received different types of vital pulp therapy (VPT) by a single endodontist, due to carious pulpal exposure, between April 2011 and October 2022. These were: Full Pulpotomy (FP), Miniature Pulpotomy (MP) and Direct Pulp Capping (DPC). Data were accessed via the dental clinic's electronic database. Patients were deemed eligible if they had pulpal exposure due to caries, but not trauma. Pre-operative, immediate post-operative and at least one follow-up radiograph at a minimum 3-month interval were required. Demographic, diagnostic, and procedural data as well as informed consent were also required. Teeth with probing depths greater than 4 mm or pulpal necrosis were excluded. Patient, tooth and treatment factors were statistically analysed for an outcome of success or failure using a Cox proportional hazards model. Kaplan/Meier curves were used to establish the mean survival times. The Log-rank test was used to compare survival across the three treatment groups. The Omnibus test of model and the -2 log likelihood ratio (-2LL) were used to assess sensitivity and model fitness. Statistical analyses were determined using the IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows Version 21.0, with P value set at <0.05. 1257 VPTs from 1149 patients had complete data and were used in the analysis. 802 cases were excluded due to no follow up radiograph. The VPT cases were divided into FP (n = 272), MP (n = 217) and DPC (n = 768). The average follow up was 42.21 months, with an overall 116-month survival rate of 99.1% and success rate of 91.6%. FP had a mean survival time of 99.43 months; for MP it was 104.26 months; for DPC it was 102.27 months. There were no significant differences between these groups (P = 0.363). There were statistically significant correlations between symptomatic Irreversible Periodontitis (IP), radiographic signs of Apical Periodontitis (AP), restoration type, restoration surfaces and the outcome of VPT. This is one of the largest cohort studies of its kind, with over 1250 cases of various VPT techniques in 10 years. There was deviation from gold standard practice, with lack of rubber dam. A lack of haemostasis after 2 min could be construed as bacterially infected pulpal tissue and require further resection of pulp. Yet, these approaches still resulted in successful outcomes. Another interesting finding was that symptomatic IP with associated AP was treated with VPT, with a 78% success rate. Considering this study and other emerging evidence in the literature, application of VPT as an alternative to conventional Root Canal Treatment could be adopted in general practice, depending on the skills and knowledge of the practitioner and patient preferences.