In 1998 social researchers reported that membership of a “culture of sexual adventurism and experimentation” was a predictor of HIV sero‐conversion among homosexually active men living in Sydney. In this paper, we explore how these researchers have understood sexual adventurism as referring to a set of sexual practices, to a subcultural network, and to a particular sexual context. We then present an analysis of the way participants in our study recounted experiences of adventurous sex, focusing on sexual occasions that feature men playing with piss. Ten men, recruited on the basis of self–identification as being into ‘adventurous sex’, were interviewed on two occasions. The first interview invited men to recount experiences of adventurous sex in detail. In the second interview we asked men to provide accounts of their sexual histories or trajectories, and to speculate about their sexual futures. The interviews, which averaged one hour in length, were recorded on audio–tape and subsequently transcribed. The 10 participants were recruited from a list of participants from the Sydney Gay Community Periodic Surveys who had indicated their willingness to participate in further research. The men ranged from 33 to 57 years old. All had had sex with casual male partners in the previous six months. Two had regular male partners. Four of them were HIV–positive, four were HIV–negative and two were serostatus unknown. In contrast with an approach to research that seeks to define clusters of sexual activity across surveys of gay men's sexual practices, our study analysed narratives of sexual occasions recounted by gay men in interviews. This approach produces an interactive and iterative perspective on sexual experience, which we develop in this paper by drawing on the affect theory of Sylvan Tomkins and by attending to aspects of momentum, time and relations as recounted in gay men's experiences of adventurous sex. Through our analysis of interview data, we develop an account of adventurous sex that focuses on how men learn in interaction with others during sexual occasions and over time. We find that approaches to sex research and health education that seek predictability in what men do sexually and rely on men to delimit the scope of their sexual repertoire are incompatible with the attitudes with which men in our study approached and recounted experiences of adventurous sex.
Read full abstract