Reviewed by: Citizens of Scandal: Journalism, Secrecy, and the Politics of Reckoning in Mexico by Vanessa Freije Stephen D. Morris Citizens of Scandal: Journalism, Secrecy, and the Politics of Reckoning in Mexico. By Vanessa Freije. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2020, p. 286, $27.95. In Citizens of Scandal, Vanessa Freije explores how Mexico City's print media shaped the narratives and the changing political landscape during the period stretching from the 1960s through the 1980s: a turbulent and critical period in Mexico's political and democratic development. Freije accomplishes this by focusing on a series of "citizen scandals:" the mediated spectacles that through a variety of interpretations contributed to the "meaning-making practice of urban citizenship" (p. 3). The scandals examined in the book include: the embezzlement scheme in agrarian lending institutions in the early 1960s and the government censorship of Los hijos de Sánchez, the controversial book about urban poverty (chapter 1); the scandalous rumors in Nezahualcóyotl in 1974 that vaccines were sterilizing children (chapter 2); the debates surrounding the discoveries of huge oil reserves under López Portillo to the eventual denunciation (and jailing) of Pemex director Jorge Díaz Serrano (chapter 3); the Rio Tula murders and the explosive case of "El Negro" Durazo, Mexico City´s corrupt and murderous police chief during the López Portillo (federal) and Carlos Hank Gonzalez (Mexico City) administrations in 1982 (chapter 4); the 1985 earthquake, with particular attention on the collapsed sweatshops (chapter 5); the coverage and narratives surrounding electoral fraud against the PAN in the 1986 state elections in Chihuahua (Chapter 6); and briefly, the publication of the book Un asesino en la presidencia? in 1987 that accused the PRI´s presidential candidate, Carlos Salinas de Gortari, of involvement in the killing of a young servant as a child and its subsequent relationship to the denunciation and jailing of the leader of the oil workers union, Joaquín "La Quina" Hernández Galicia (epilogue). Throughout, Freije leverages the concept of "mediated citizenship" as the process by which urban Mexicans developed their perspectives and understandings of the political system through everyday interactions with the mass media. For students of Mexican history and Mexican journalism in particular, the account provides an in-depth look at the evolution of modern Mexican media. Discussion centers on the major institutional actors (Excelsior, Unomasuno, La Jornada and other Mexico City newspapers), particularly the rise of the news weekly Proceso in the wake of the government´s forcing out the editors of Excelsior; major personalities and opinionmakers like Manuel Buendia, Heberto Castillo, Agular Camin, Carlos Monsivais, Elena Poniatowska; and the influence of radio, television, flyers, comics and political cartoons, and urban graffiti. [End Page 234] Interwoven throughout the analysis is the dynamic and evolving relationship between the state and the media that parallels the democratic changes taking place during these years. Through various methods, the Mexican state had long controlled and censored the Mexican press. Debates and coverage during the scandals, however, effectively pushed the limits on what was permitted, ever so slightly forcing open the political system. At times, coverage simply escaped government controls. Following the 1985 earthquake, for example, media revealed deep-seated corruption and a state incapable of responding to the destruction and providing basic human services. Here, as in other examples, the government felt threatened by what it saw as uncontrolled organizations and demands from below, demands that they saw as being pursued outside the scope (and controls) of the government and the party´s (PRI) corporatist structures. Thanks largely to the narrative of Carlos Monsivais, the public came to see the experience as an illustration of the ability of civil society and the people to surpass and assume the role of the state. The mediated traumatic event proved critical to the rise of civil society organizations and gains by political opposition, putting Mexico on the road to greater political opening. Part of this dynamic involved the way the government sought to shape the narrative and counter those produced by journalists and opposition politicians. Under such circumstances, the government employed its allies within the media, offering an elite and cosmopolitan perspective, as in the reaction to the widespread rumors...
Read full abstract