Cancer Screening Practices Research Articles

Anal Cancer Screening Practices Among Higher-Risk Populations in an Academic Medical System.

Although some experts recommend anal cancer screening for disproportionally affected populations including people living with HIV (PWH), condyloma acuminata, human papillomavirus-associated gynecologic dysplasia and cancers, and solid organ transplants, actual screening practices remain understudied. Our objective was to characterize anal cancer screening practices among higher-risk populations in an academic medical system with access to high-resolution anoscopy. We extracted outpatient clinical data for the aforementioned populations from January 1, 2015, to August 1, 2022, at 3 sites of an academic medical system. Data included patients' demographics, medical comorbidities, and anal cytology and human papillomavirus testing results. We used χ2 tests and logistic regression to assess for associations between patient characteristics and anal cancer screening. Of 7654 patients, 6.3% received anal cytology screening at least once including 21.7% of PWH, 13.8% of people with condyloma acuminata, 1.1% of people with gynecologic cancers, and 0.5% of people with solid organ transplants. In multivariable analysis, Black patients were 46% less likely to receive screening than White patients (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.40-0.71), and cisgender women were 73% less likely to receive screening than cisgender men (95% confidence interval, 0.20-0.38). Of 485 individuals who received anal cytology screening, 37.5% were only screened once and 70.5% had abnormal cytology on one or more screenings. Only one-fifth of PWH received anal cancer screening, and other higher-risk populations had even lower screening rates. Black patients and women were also less likely to be screened. Strategies to improve equitable screening practices for anal cancer are needed.

A Global Survey of Self-Reported Cancer Screening Practices by Health Professionals for Kidney Transplant Candidates and Recipients

A Global Survey of Self-Reported Cancer Screening Practices by Health Professionals for Kidney Transplant Candidates and Recipients

Knowledge of Breast Cancer Risk Factors and Screening Practices Among Female Patients at ATBUTH Bauchi.

Breast cancer is a global public health problem and is currently the second leading cause of cancers word wide and the most commonly diagnosed cancer among women with 2.3 million new cases (11.6%) reported in 2022. There are low survival rates for breast cancer among women in West Africa due to late presentation. This was a cross-sectional, descriptive survey conducted among two hundred and twenty five (225) female patients at ATBUTH Bauchi. A structured questionnaire was used to assess the level of knowledge of breast cancer risk factors and utilization of breast cancer screening measures among respondents. Data was exported and analyzed using IBM SPSS version 24. Most of the study respondents (92.9%) have heard of breast cancer and most of them know that older women (73.4%), having a family member with breast cancer (62.7%) and lack of breastfeeding (59.1%) increases a woman’s risk. Few respondents (40.9%) practice monthly BSE. Less than half of study respondents (42.7%) have had CBE before and very few (7.6%) have had mammography before. Most of the respondents have heard of breast cancer and are aware of some of the risk factors for breast cancer. However, there’s low utilization of breast cancer screening methods.

Challenges and coping strategies of cancer screening research and practice in China: Taking esophageal cancer as an example

For most cancers, clear intervention targets for primary prevention are lacking, due to unidentified high-risk causal factors. Consequently, the focus of cancer prevention and control in China has shifted towards early screening and treatment within the general population. This review outlines the significant challenges in research and practice of cancer prevention and control in China, including: ①inadequate understanding of the natural history of cancer; ② limited high-level evidence supporting cancer screening effectiveness and value; ③compromised efficiency and accuracy in current screening modality; and ④ insufficient universality and sustainability of the current screening practices, taking esophageal cancer as an example. To address these challenges, we propose potential coping strategies: ① establishing tailored technologies and pathways for cancer prevention and control based on population-based and clinical epidemiological studies using high-quality designs; ②breaking conventional constraints to establish a novel, efficient, and precision cancer screening strategy and modality that aligned with the frontline needs of cancer prevention and control; and ③establishing enhanced communication platforms among government policymaking departments, scientific research teams, and industrial institutions to foster collaboration and translation in the field of cancer prevention and control. Ultimately, through the collaboration of multiple disciplines and departments, we will jointly achieve the long-term goal of cancer prevention and treatment.

Cervical Cancer Screening Practice and Associated Factors Among School Teachers in Bahir Dar City, North West Ethiopia: A Cross‐Sectional Study

ABSTRACTBackground and AimsDespite its prioritization by the World Health Organization, improving access to cervical cancer screening remains a challenge in Ethiopia. Educated individuals, particularly teachers, are viewed as key influencers in promoting healthy lifestyles among youth and can significantly contribute to cervical cancer prevention. However, there is a notable gap in research regarding cervical cancer screening practices among female educators in the studied region. This study aimed to assess the cervical cancer screening practices and associated factors among female school teachers in Bahir Dar, Ethiopia, 2024.MethodsA school‐based cross‐sectional study was conducted from May 27 to June 28, 2024, involving 561 female school teachers in Bahir Dar City, using a stratified multistage sampling method. Data were gathered through a pretested structured questionnaire, entered in Epi‐data version‐4.6, and analyzed with SPSS version‐23. Bi‐variable and multivariable binary logistic regression analyses were performed, considering variables with p values < 0.05 as statistically significant. Multicollinearity was assessed, and the Hosmer–Lemeshow test evaluated the model's fit.ResultsThe proportion of female school teachers practicing cervical cancer screening was 14.6% (95% CI: 11.57%–17.66%). Significant factors associated with screening included having more than one lifetime sexual partner (AOR = 2.96, 95% CI: 1.48–4.92), a history of gynecological examinations (AOR = 2.59, 95% CI: 1.28–5.23), a fair understanding of cervical cancer (AOR = 2.16, 95% CI: 1.12–4.17), a positive attitude toward screening (AOR = 3.23, 95% CI: 1.65–6.33), and a high perceived susceptibility to cervical cancer (AOR = 2.57, 95% CI: 1.34–4.93).ConclusionsCervical cancer screening rates among female school teachers in Bahir Dar City fall short of the HSTP‐II target. Independent predictors of screening include having multiple sexual partners, a history of gynecological exams, knowledge of cervical cancer, attitudes toward screening, and perceived susceptibility. To improve these rates, initiatives should focus on raising awareness and fostering positive attitudes among teachers about cervical cancer and health‐seeking behavior.

A stop-smoking strategy after cervical cancer screening: Results of a cluster-randomised controlled trial in Dutch general practice.

This study aimed to assess whether brief stop-smoking advice given to women who smoke and visit their general practice for cervical cancer screening improves smoking cessation outcomes. This two-arm cluster-randomised controlled trial was conducted in 75 Dutch general practices. Participants in the intervention group received brief stop-smoking advice based on the Ask-Advise-Connect method, delivered by a practice assistant. Patient-reported outcomes were measured at 6 months: undertaking a serious quit attempt of at least 24 hours during follow-up (primary outcome), 7-day point prevalence abstinence (PPA) at 6 months, reduction in number of cigarettes smoked, increase in motivation to quit smoking, exposure to advice or support, and other psychological and behavioural measurements. There was no significant difference in undertaking a serious quit attempt between the intervention (39.8% of n=266) and control group (36.0% of n = 214), OR 1.18 (95% CI: 0.80-1.72, P=0.41). Neither did the PPA significantly differ between groups: 21.1% vs. 16.3%, OR 1.38 (95% CI: 0.83-2.29, P=0.21). Although nonsignificant, the direction of effects for the aforementioned outcomes was in favour of the intervention group. The reduction in number of cigarettes smoked and increase in motivation to quit did not differ between groups. The uptake of cessation counselling was higher in the intervention (14.7%) than in the control group (2.8%). A brief stop-smoking strategy after the smear test for cervical screening might encourage women who smoke to attempt quitting and seek cessation counselling, but a significant effect could not be demonstrated in this trial. The results of this cluster randomised trial suggest that brief advice to stop-smoking delivered by a practice assistant after routine cervical screening in general practice might encourage women who smoke to attempt quitting, but a significant effect could not be proven. Also, women who receive advice show a higher uptake of professional cessation counselling compared to their controls. Providing brief advice after the cervical smear might therefore be an useful opportunistic approach to stimulate cessation in women who smoke.

Breaking barriers: improving mammography screening accessibility and quality of care for breast cancer women with disabilities in Saudi Arabia.

Breast cancer screening remains pivotal in early detection and intervention. However, disparities persist, particularly among women with disabilities, necessitating a comprehensive understanding of their screening practices. This study aims to investigate breast cancer screening behaviours in Saudi women with disabilities. A cross-sectional study conducted in Saudi Arabia surveyed 307 women with disabilities, evaluating their screening frequency, knowledge of mammography, disability types, and duration. The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) was employed for data analysis. The study found that 70.4% of participants had irregular breast cancer screenings, and 92.5% lacked tailored information on breast cancer screening. The primary sources of information were support groups (59.3%) and healthcare professionals (25.4%). Significant associations were observed between education levels and awareness of the importance of mammography and the increased risk of breast cancer in individuals with disabilities. Notably, participants with higher education levels demonstrated greater awareness. The findings highlight substantial gaps in breast cancer screening practices and knowledge among Saudi women with disabilities. There is a critical need for tailored educational programs, accessible information, and targeted awareness campaigns to address these disparities. Enhancing the accessibility of screening services and information for this demographic is essential for improving healthcare equity and outcomes.

Impact of financial literacy and education on breast and cervical cancer screening participation in Japan.

Despite government efforts, the uptake of screening for breast and cervical cancers among Japanese women remains low. This study employs financial literacy and financial education as proxies for rational decision-making to explore their potential to enhance cancer screening practices in Japan. Using data from Osaka University's Preference Parameters Study, mean comparison tests and probit regression models are utilized to examine the association between breast and cervical cancer screening and financial literacy and financial education. The results of probit regression show that individuals with higher levels of financial education tend to participate in both breast and cervical cancer screening. In contrast, individuals with higher financial literacy are likely to participate in breast cancer screening, whereas no significant impact is observed for cervical cancer screening. Furthermore, our findings reveal that financial education positively influences both breast and cervical cancer screening. Factors such as employment, marriage, higher education, increased household income, and greater assets demonstrate robust positive relationships with breast and cervical cancer screening. Meanwhile, psychological factors including happiness, a myopic view of the future, anxiety about later life, and perceived health status have no significant associations, except for a positive association between anxiety about life and cervical cancer screening. Our study suggests the development of targeted educational programs that leverage financial literacy and financial education to raise awareness about the importance of breast and cervical cancer screening.

Knowledge and practice of early gastric cancer screening among adults aged ≥ 45 years in China: a cross-sectional study

BackgroundAs the incidence of gastric cancer increases sharply in adults aged over 45 years, a better understanding of gastric cancer screening knowledge and practice is crucial to promote cancer-screening services. This study aimed to evaluate knowledge of early gastric cancer screening, adherence to screening, and perceived barriers hindering screening practices among adults aged ≥ 45 years in China.MethodsA multi-center, face-to-face, cross-sectional study was conducted in community sites in Shijiazhuang, China, through the distribution of structured questionnaires from August to September, 2022.ResultsOf the 1053 respondents, only 13.4% demonstrated a good understanding of early gastric cancer screening. While 64.0% knew that gastroscopy is the gold standard for screening (“how to screen”), only 19.9% were aware of the recommended starting age (“when to screen”). Moreover, less than half could correctly identify high-risk groups (“whom to screen”), with awareness ranging from 20.5% for those infected with H. pylori to 47.8% for those with gastric diseases. Independent factors related to higher screening knowledge included female sex (OR = 1.55, 95% CI = 1.01–2.38), higher education level (OR = 4.03, 95% CI = 2.68–6.06), being with a personal/family experience of gastric diseases (OR = 1.68, 95% CI = 1.12–2.52). In addition, only 23.4% of respondents underwent GC screening. The dominant barrier to early screening was the “absence of symptoms or signs”, followed by “fearing procedural discomfort”.ConclusionThis study highlights significant gaps in early gastric cancer screening knowledge and participation among middle-aged and elderly individuals in China. Addressing these gaps through culturally tailored health education campaigns is a critical strategy for increasing public awareness and participation.

Determinants of breast cancer screening behavior amongst Nigerian women using the transtheoretical model

Breast cancer is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality amongst women in developing and developed countries. Breast Self-Examination (BSE), mammography and clinical examination are amongst the most effective methods of early detection, however uptake remains low. The Transtheoretical Model (TTM) has been used in many other countries to characterize behavioral shifts related to enable the adoption of more focused tactics for improving breast cancer screening behaviors among Nigerian women. A cross-sectional research study was conducted to assess the level of knowledge and uptake of breast cancer screening practice based on the various stages of readiness and change predictors using the Transtheoretical Model (TTM). The model was applied to identify and characterise key behavioural determinants such as decision balance, stage of change, and process of change (POC) for breast cancer screening through breast self-examination and mammography. A total of 265 adult female respondents in Kaduna State, Northwest, Nigeria was sampled out of which ninety-one (91%) had no family history of breast cancer. Although 80.3% had knowledge of breast cancer disease, 68% of respondents knew how to conduct BSE and only 55% practiced it. In terms of BSE behaviour staging, 29.4% and 26.7% respondents are in the preparation and maintenance stages respectively. In terms of mammography adoption, most respondents (34%) are in the preparation stage. Review of process of change determinants show that breast cancer screening behaviour are driven more by experiential determinants as compared to behaviour determinants. Addressing the complex factors influencing BSE and mammography practice requires a comprehensive social behaviour change approach that may sustaining positive behaviour-driving factors and minimise inhibitive factors that can promote breast cancer screening.

Mammography screening among women attending primary healthcare centers in Monastir, Tunisia

Abstract Background Breast cancer is the leading cancer among women worldwide. Early detection through mammography screening improves prognosis and enhances survival rate for this disease. The aim of this study was to identify the factors associated with mammography screening utilization among women attending primary healthcare centers. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted in four primary healthcare centers in Monastir governorate in October 2023 using a pre-tested questionnaire. Women aged over 45 years-old were included as they were the target group in the breast cancer screening strategy. Univariate then multivariate analyses were performed in order to identify the factors associated with mammography screening utilization. Data was analyzed by SPSS 21.0. Results A total of 192 women were included in the study with a mean age of 56.7±8.8 years-old. Among them, 79.7 % (n = 153) were married and 51.6% (n = 98) had three children and less. A total of 55.3 % (n = 94) had a primary education level. Regarding participants’ practices of breast cancer screening, 35% of our participants have had mammogram. Univariate analysis showed that the knowledge about breast cancer symptoms (p = 0.015), practicing Breast self-examination (BSE) (p = 0.002), being aware about mammography (p = 0.001) and the recommended age of the screening at 45 years-old (p = 0.001) were significantly associated with adherence to breast cancer screening. Multivariate analysis revealed that practicing BSE (ORa=2.60 [95%CI: 1.22-5.55] and knowing the recommended age of mammography screening (ORa=2.28 [95%CI: 1.17-4.45] were significant (P < 0.05) predictors of mammography screening utilization. Conclusions Mammography screening rate is low. This study had provided some informations about factors influencing mammography screening. Policymakers and public health practitioners should consider the identified factors when developing intervention programs to improve breast cancer screening. Key messages • There is a need to conduct education sessions in schools to raise awareness about breast cancer screening at an early age. • Social media can be a tool for health education on mammography screening.

Geographical variation in prostate cancer testing explained by socio-economic position in Stockholm

Abstract Background Prostate cancer screening using prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing is controversial but remains prevalent in many countries. Despite its prevalence there is little information in Sweden or globally on the spatial heterogeneity in PSA testing. This study aims to describe the spatio-temporal variation in PSA testing in the Stockholm region specifically at the municipality and small area level. Additionally, it aims to quantify the extent to which socio-economic position (SEP) indicators such as education, income, and country of birth explain the observed variation in PSA testing. Methods A retrospective population-based register study was conducted, encompassing men aged 40 years and older residing in the Stockholm region from 2007 to 2016. Utilizing spatial smoothing techniques, we calculated the age-standardised proportion of men undergoing PSA testing prior to any prostate cancer diagnosis within each area for every calendar year. Furthermore, we used Bayesian logistic regression models with spatial random effects to estimate the individual-level association between PSA testing and socio-economic position. The proportion of variance in PSA testing explained by various measures of SEP was also estimated at both the municipality and small area levels. Results Significant geographical disparities in PSA testing were observed across small areas within Stockholm. The proportion of variance explained in PSA testing at the small area level was highest for income (32.6%), followed by education (9.7%) and country of birth (7.4%). Incorporating all SEP measures led to a higher proportion of explained variance at the small area level (41.6%) compared to the municipality level (24.8%). Conclusions PSA testing was significantly associated with various socio-economic indicators and some of the spatial variation could be explained by SEP. It would be useful to ascertain whether similar patterns are observed in other regions or countries. Key messages • The findings suggested widespread and consistent opportunistic prostate cancer screening practices within the Stockholm region, raising concerns regarding potential overdiagnosis and overtreatment. • The socio-economic differences in prostate cancer screening could partially explain the differences in cancer incidence and mortality.

The Effect of Text messages and Education on Cancer Screening in Women Aged 30-65

Abstract Background Despite it is known that cancer screenings reduce cancer-related deaths, screening rates are still inadequate. The aim of this study is to examine the effect of text messaging and training on cancer screening in women aged 30-65. Methods This non-randomized controlled trial was conducted with 120 women aged 30-65 between November 2023 and April 2024 in Tekirdağ, Türkiye. Participants were divided into the text message group (TMG) (n = 60), the training group (TG) (n = 60), and the control group (CG) (n = 60). In the text message group, every participant received text messages about cancer and importance of screening procedures, one a day for ten days. The training group was educated for a session that lasted 45 min. Data was collected both before and 3 months after the intervention, using a questionnaire that included two parts (sociodemographic characteristics and stages of change for cancer screening practices). Data was analyzed using the Marginal Homogeneity test. Results The rates of those who had a pap smear test, breast self-examination (BSE), mammography, and stool occult blood screening were found to be significantly higher in both the text message group and the training group in the post-test than the pre-test. (p<.001). In the text message group, there was an increased rate of 43.4% for pap smear test, 25% for BSE, 17.3% for mammography, and 10% for stool occult blood screening. In the training group, there was an increased rate of 31,7 % for pap smear test, 26,7% for BSE, 13,3% for mammography, and 23,4 % for stool occult blood screening. There was no change in the control group. Conclusions The results showed that both text messages and training about cancer screening are effective in increasing the rate of cervix, breast, and colorectal cancer screening. Key messages • Text messaging about cancer screening is as effective as training in increasing the rate of cervix, breast, and colorectal cancer screening. • Text messaging interventions may be an effective and practical way to increase cancer screening rates in populations most affected by health disparities.

Determinants of cervical cancer screening among women of childbearing age in four sub-Saharan African countries: insights from large population surveys

BackgroundCervical cancer is the most common cause of cancer-related mortality among women in Africa. Cervical cancer screening in women is associated with decreased incidence and mortality of cervical cancer. There is a dearth of recent data regarding the prevalence and associated factors of cervical cancer screening in sub-Saharan Africa. Therefore, this study is intended to determine the prevalence and associated factors impacting cervical cancer screening among women in four sub-Saharan African countries.MethodsData from the recent demographic and health surveys of four countries in sub-Saharan Africa conducted between 2022 and 2023. Multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression was used to determine the factors associated with the outcome variable. Variables with a p-value < 0.05 were declared statistically significant.ResultsThe prevalence of cervical cancer screening among women of childbearing age in four sub-Saharan African countries was 8.90% (95% CI: 8.67%, 9.13%). At the individual level, being older, educated, non-breastfeeding, employed, wealthier, sexually active, using contraceptives, having media exposure, visiting healthcare facilities in the last 12 months, and residing in urban areas were associated with higher odds of cervical cancer screening. At the community level, being from communities with a high level of literacy and media exposure increases the odds of cervical cancer screening among women in sub-Saharan Africa.ConclusionThe prevalence of cervical cancer screening among childbearing-age women was found to be low. To improve cervical cancer screening practices among women of childbearing age, it is therefore advised to support women’s empowerment, mass media campaigns, and regular visits to healthcare facilities.

Disparities in lungcancerscreening utilization attwo health systems in the Southeastern USA.

Low-dose computed tomography lung cancer screening is effective for reducing lung cancer mortality. It is critical to understand the lung cancer screening practices for screen-eligible individuals living in Alabama and Georgia where lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death. High lung cancer incidence and mortality rates are attributed to high smoking rates among underserved, low income, and rural populations. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to define sociodemographic and clinical characteristicsof patients who were screened for lung cancer at an Academic Medical Center (AMC) in Alabama and a Safety Net Hospital (SNH) in Georgia. A retrospective cohort study of screen-eligible patients was constructed using electronic health records between 2015 and 2020 seen at an Academic Medical Center (AMC) and a Safety Net Hospital (SNH) separately. Chi-square tests and Student t tests were used to compare screening uptake across patient demographic and clinical variables. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regressions determined significant predictors of lung cancer screening uptake. At the AMC, 67,355 were identified as eligible for LCS and 1,129 were screened. In bivariate analyses, there were several differences between those who were screened and those who were not screened. Screening status in the site at Alabama-those with active tobacco use are significantly more likely to be screened than former smokers (OR: 3.208, p < 0.01). For every 10-unit increase in distance, the odds of screening decreased by about 15% (OR: 0.848, p < 0.01). For every 10-year increase in age, the odds of screening decrease by about 30% (OR: 0.704, p < 0.01). Each additional comorbidity increases the odds of screening by about 7.5% (OR: 1.075, p < 0.01). Those with both private and public insurance have much higher odds of screening compared to those with only private insurance (OR: 5.403, p < 0.01). However, those with only public insurance have lower odds of screening compared to those with private insurance (OR: 0.393, p < 0.01). At the SNH-each additional comorbidity increased the odds of screening by about 11.9% (OR: 1.119, p = 0.01). Notably, those with public insurance have significantly higher odds of being screened compared to those with private insurance (OR: 2.566, p < 0.01). The study provides evidence that LCS has not reached all subgroups and that additional targeted efforts are needed to increase lung cancer screening uptake. Furthermore, disparity was noticed between adults living closer to screening institutions and those who lived farther.

S396 Assessing the Knowledge and Practice of Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Ghanaian Healthcare Providers

S396 Assessing the Knowledge and Practice of Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Ghanaian Healthcare Providers

S1872 Examining Cervical Cancer Screening Practices in Liver Transplant Recipients: Lack of Organ Specific Guidelines and Socioeconomic Influences

S1872 Examining Cervical Cancer Screening Practices in Liver Transplant Recipients: Lack of Organ Specific Guidelines and Socioeconomic Influences

S447 Colorectal Cancer Screening Practices in Patients With Unknown Family History

S447 Colorectal Cancer Screening Practices in Patients With Unknown Family History

Abstract PR012: Social and Structural Influences of Preventive Cancer Screenings for Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander Adults in Hawaiʻi

Abstract Background: Native Hawaiians and Pacific Islanders (NHPI) are hindered by sociocultural, geographic, and environmental factors that contribute to cancer health disparities, often masked by aggregated data with Asian Americans. An average of 7,393 Hawai‘i residents are diagnosed with invasive cancer yearly, and rates are disproportionate ethnically; . Native Hawaiians and Micronesians suffer higher mortality rates for breast cancer (24.9 and 21.6 per 100,000) than White women (17.0). This study aims to investigate social drivers of health behaviors among NHPI in Hawaiʻi by examining social factors that influence cancer screenings through mixed methods. Methods: This mixed methods study is a follow-up to a cross-sectional survey administered in 2018 to 3 Pacific Islander ethnic subgroups: Native Hawaiians, Chuukese, and Marshallese in Hawaiʻi using Respondent Driven Sampling within public housing (N=1,010 NHPI). Disparate cancer screening practices were uncovered within these groups when compared to Hawaiʻi state data. Logistic regression was used to analyze predictors of colon, breast, and cervical cancer screenings. The Gelberg Behavioral Model for Vulnerable Populations and socio-ecological model served as the theoretical models. To triangulate the findings, 16 semi-structured interviews with adults living within the communities first surveyed were conducted in 2023 to uncover any additional drivers of health behaviors that the regression missed. Results: Quantitative findings include cultural/linguistic misunderstandings between NHPI and healthcare providers. Participants who indicated difficulty understanding a provider’s instructions because of language were 51% less likely to be screened for cervical cancer (p = .04). Individuals who hold neutral acculturation to both their ethnic and American culture are less likely to be screened for cancer. Those whose responses fell in a neutral category were 40% less likely than those with a high ethnic identity to have had a colon cancer screening (p = .02). Qualitative findings demonstrate differing views among Pacific Islander groups including competition for resources between groups within public housing. All of the interviewees highlight the role of God and faith in decision making. Informational exchanges take place mainly within the family and cohabitants. From triangulating the findings, there is a lack of strong social ties/networks that could facilitate health-based resources and knowledge. Families are not discussing self-care or family histories of disease, which are instrumental in the early detection of cancers and missed within the regression. Conclusion: This study provides insight into the social drivers of cancer screenings for NHPI communities in Hawaiʻi. Novel insights for the fields of medical sociology and public health are highlighted by influential social processes to NHPI cancer screening behaviors. Recommendations include further research and programs that focus on and foster social dynamics of these communities in relation to cancer screenings. Citation Format: Mark L. Willingham Jr., Kevin Cassel, Wei Zhang, Tressa P. Diaz, Angela Sy, Ian Pagano, Munirih R. Ta'afaki, Angelina G. Mummert. Social and Structural Influences of Preventive Cancer Screenings for Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander Adults in Hawaiʻi [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 17th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2024 Sep 21-24; Los Angeles, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2024;33(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PR012.

440.3: Reported cancer screening practices by healthcare professionals for kidney transplant candidates and recipients.

440.3: Reported cancer screening practices by healthcare professionals for kidney transplant candidates and recipients.