Advance Care Planning Practices Research Articles

Cross-disciplinary advance care planning in oncology and palliative care amidst a pandemic: a best practice implementation project.

Advance care planning (ACP) ensures that patients receive medical care aligned with their values, goals, and preferences, especially regarding end-of-life decisions in serious chronic illnesses. This project aimed to introduce and promote evidence-based ACP in oncology and palliative care at a midsized hospital near Berlin, Germany, during the COVID-19 pandemic. This project was guided by the JBI Evidence Implementation Framework and used a mixed methods audit cycle. A baseline audit was conducted using qualitative interviews and workshops with representatives from all the health care disciplines involved in oncology and palliative care at the hospital. The findings were compared with eight best practice recommendations. Targeted strategies aimed at the key stakeholders involved in ACP practice were then implemented. Finally, a semi-quantitative questionnaire was used in a follow-up audit with the same participants as in the baseline audit. The baseline audit revealed a high level of familiarity with the concept of ACP. However, there was a lack of a uniformly accepted definition and understanding of ACP among the health care professionals, leading to a lack of coordination in task distribution. The follow-up audit revealed improvements with regard to education and training in ACP (Criterion 1: 50% to 100%) and organizational support to facilitate ACP conversations (Criterion 3: 87.5% to 100%). Other audit criteria compliance rates remained unchanged. Clinical education and team-based process analysis can facilitate ACP implementation across disciplines in oncology and palliative care facilities. However, the project did not succeed in implementing lasting changes in clinical processes and best practice ACP due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Such an endeavor would demand considerable resources and time, both of which were constrained during the pandemic. http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A236.

A Pathway for Advance Care Planning Co-Developed by Service Users and Interdisciplinary Healthcare Professionals in Older Persons Mental Health

Abstract Background Advance Care Planning (ACP) has been recognised as an effective mechanism for decision-making, maintaining autonomy, and ensuring that end-of-life care is aligned with an individual’s will and preference. However, healthcare professional's (HCPs) lack of confidence and knowledge has been cited as a barrier to practice. Furthermore, there are currently no widely accepted guidelines for ACP in health service settings (Barnett et al., 2024[1]). A key aim of the second stage of a three-stage action research study was to co-design a pathway to support ACP practice in a Mental Health Service for Older Persons. Reference [1] Barnett, M.D., Bennett-Leleux, L.J. & Guillory, L.A. (2024) End-of-life treatment preferences and ACP among older adults, Death Studies, 48:2, 95-102. Methods The pathway was developed through cooperative inquiry (CI), a collaborative research approach. The CI group involved three service users (one with dementia family carer experience), and six interdisciplinary HCPs coming together as co-subjects and co-researchers. Five in-person CI meetings were convened. Results The CI group co-developed a person-centred pathway encompassing a tiered approach to ACP, which would be a source of guidance and support for service users, family carers and HCPs. Key components include training and education for HCPs to enhance confidence and skills; a Padlet online platform to host resources for service users and family carers; and facilitated interventions based on the individual needs of service users, including potentially additional accompanying documentation to capture mental health needs. An interdisciplinary approach to facilitating ACP engagement, with social work taking a lead role was also suggested. Conclusion The pathway was identified as an effective approach to embedding ACP practice in older persons mental health, through a tiered person-centred framework catering to the needs of both service users, and the training needs of staff. The pathway is proposed as potentially adaptable to other older persons services to support ACP engagement.

Advance Care Planning Practices For Nursing Home Residents Referred To Specialist Palliative Care In An Acute Hospital Setting

Abstract Background Advance care planning (ACP) is a structured process of discussion between patients, their loved ones and health care professionals, which aims to establish and record an individual’s goals and preferences for future medical treatment and care. It is of significant relevance to nursing home residents, a comorbid and frail population at high risk of clinical deterioration. Methods This prospective, observational study included all nursing home residents referred to an inpatient specialist palliative care (SPC) service in a model four hospital over a six-month period (November 2023 to May 2024). Basic clinical and demographic information as well as data on functional status and advance care planning was anonymised and collated using Microsoft excel. Results 36 patients (mean age 79 years) were recruited. 36% (n=13) were referred within 48 hours of admission. The average Australia-modified Karnofsky Performance Scale score was 40 on admission. 94% (n=34) had a clinical frailty score of ≥7 on admission. 72% (n=26) had an advance care plan in the nursing home. However, 22% (n=8) had not recorded their wishes pertaining to hospital readmission and 3 patients were admitted despite documenting a preference to remain in the nursing home. 53% (n=19) had not documented their preferred place for end-of-life care. 69% (n=25) died in hospital. Conclusion Most nursing home residents referred to the inpatient SPC team had severe frailty and died in hospital, reflecting the prognostic implications of severe frailty. Crucial components of the advance care plan were omitted in a significant proportion of patients, which may have influenced their referral to hospital. Provision of increased support to staff caring for older, frail adults in the residential care setting should be considered to enhance ACP.

Quality of Advance Care Planning in Long-Term Care and Transfers to Hospital at the End Of Life

ObjectivesOur primary objective was to determine if more comprehensive advance care planning (ACP) documentation was associated with fewer transfers to hospital in the last year of life. Our secondary objective was to determine the impact of ACP processes and practices on hospital transfers in the last year of life. DesignRetrospective cohort study. Setting and ParticipantsLong-term care (LTC) residents in Ontario, Canada, 65 years and older who died between January 1, 2017, and May 30, 2018, and resided in a participating LTC home. MethodsWe administered a survey to directors of care at LTC homes inquiring about ACP practices. Our exposure of interest was living in a home with comprehensive ACP documentation that includes information beyond preferences for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and hospital transfer. Our primary outcome was the number of transfers to hospital in the last year of life. We fit negative binomial regression models to determine the independent effect of comprehensive ACP and other indicators of ACP quality. ResultsA total of 157 LTC homes with 6637 decedent residents were included in our study; 2942 lived in homes with comprehensive ACP documentation and 3695 had non-comprehensive ACP documents. Comprehensive documentation was not associated with fewer hospital transfers in the final year of life [incidence rat ratio (IRR), 1.00; 95% CI, 0.91–1.09]. ACP documentation update frequency, availability of ACP documents in the electronic medical record, referring to ACP documents during a health crisis, inclusion of resident values in ACP documents, and involvement of a multidisciplinary team were all associated with fewer transfers to hospital during follow-up in the last year of life. Conclusions and ImplicationsACP documents that contain information beyond preferences for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and hospital transfer had no association with transfers to hospital, but high-quality ACP practices and processes were associated with fewer transfers.

Preferences for Advance Care Planning in Patients with End-Stage Kidney Disease: A Cross-Sectional Survey among Nephrology Healthcare Providers in a Tertiary Care Center in India

Introduction: Advance care planning (ACP) is essential in managing patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), yet its integration into clinical practice remains limited, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. This study explores the preferences, attitudes and perceived barriers of nephrology healthcare providers toward ACP for patients with ESKD in a tertiary care center in India. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among nephrology healthcare providers at a tertiary care center in India. The survey, developed from literature reviews and pretested, covered demographics, ACP knowledge and attitudes, current practices, and perceived barriers and facilitators. Data collection occurred from September 2022 to March 2023. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively, and qualitative data through thematic analysis. Results: A total of 50 healthcare providers participated. While 36% acknowledged the importance of ACP, only 8% routinely engaged in ACP discussions. Major barriers included inadequate training (22%), lack of awareness about the importance of discussing ACP among stakeholders (20%), cultural barriers (18%), lack of time (14%), and the absence of institutional protocols for discussion on ACP (14%). Additional barriers included instances where families withhold health information from patients due to fear of losing hope (16%) and patient/family discomfort in discussing ACP (12%). Providers expressed a need for structured ACP protocols and educational programs. Conclusion: Despite recognizing its importance, ACP is underutilized in the care of patients with ESKD in India. Addressing the identified barriers through targeted interventions may enhance ACP practices and improve patient outcomes.

The gap between expectations and reality in advance care planning in long-term care settings

Background: Advance care planning (ACP) is an integral part of good quality end-of-life care. This study aimed to explore the role and practice of ACP among health and social care professionals (HSCPs) in a community long-term care facility. Methods: This was a mixed-methods study. The study purposefully sampled 12 HSCPs from one community long-term care facility in Macao, China. All data were collected in November 2022. Results: Some participants had discussed with terminally ill residents or with families in terms of end-of-life care preferences, the average correct rate of ACP knowledge was 67.4%. Interview data showed that HSCPs were primarily concerned with information-giving. The responsibility of decision-making was found to have been placed predominantly on family members of the residents. Conclusion: Study findings raised awareness in that the execution of ACP has remained in discord with the expectations in practicing ACP. The study illuminated that the perceived sense of responsibility among HSCPs was influenced by the potential legal risks involved and consequentially impacted on the adherence to individual's decisions.

Structure of Advance Care Planning Practice by Home Health Nurses for Multigenerational Families With Dependent Children and Terminally Ill Grandparents

The present study aimed to identify the structure of advance care planning (ACP) practices implemented by home health nurses (HHNs) for multigenerational families with dependent children and terminally ill grandparents. Interviews of 20 HHNs were conducted. The grounded theory approach was used to describe the interactions among families with dependent children, terminally ill grandparents, and HHNs. The results showed that the structure of ACP practices for multigenerational families with dependent children and terminally ill grandparents was composed of 2 levels. First, HHNs were providing the underlying foundational “Practice of supporting end-of-life care (EOL care) at home” for family members from 2 generations: sandwich generation caregivers (SGCs) and terminally ill grandparents. Second, they were providing “Practices that connect multiple generations,” “Practices that address the children,” and “Practices that involve hands-on experience and communication” for multigenerational families with dependent children and terminally ill grandparents. Practices based on providing stability among family members from 2 generations, SGCs and terminally ill grandparents, were the nursing practice structure that activated ACP for multigenerational families with dependent children and terminally ill grandparents.

Nurses' engagement in advance care planning practices: A descriptive cross-sectional study.

To describe and compare nurses' awareness of, attitudes toward, and participation in advance care planning, as well as related facilitators and challenges, in four types of healthcare settings. A cross-sectional descriptive study. Four hundred and ninety-eight registered nurses from tertiary, secondary and primary healthcare institutions, along with long-term care centres in South Korea, participated in an investigator-developed online survey. The collected data were analysed using descriptive statistics, chi-squared test, one-way ANOVA, and binary logistic regression. Participants were on average 30.6 ± 7.3 years old, mostly female (95.4%), employed as staff nurses (95.4%), held bachelor's degrees or higher (84.1%), and had worked for less than 5 years at their current institutions (69.7%). Overall, 49% of the participants were familiar with advance care planning. While most participants supported nurse involvement in advance care planning with patients and surrogates, fewer were willing to engage or recommend it. Less than half were actively engaged in advance care planning practices. A notable challenge was the lack of time due to excessive workload. Compared to those from tertiary healthcare institutions, participants from secondary and primary healthcare institutions and long-term care centres were less likely to be aware of advance care planning. Participants from secondary and primary healthcare institutions had lower odds of checking for the presence of advance directives and the physician orders for life-sustaining treatment. Nurses demonstrated low awareness and participation in advance care planning. Nurses' insufficient time and competency to conduct advance care planning in their practice should be addressed. Educational programs, initiatives (e.g. guidelines, position statements) and legal and policy-level efforts (e.g. nurse staffing, role clarification, reimbursement) are crucial to incorporate advance care planning into routine nursing practice. What problem did the study address? Nurses play an important role in advance care planning; however, limited is understood about their readiness and involvement in such practices. What were the main findings? Nurses' awareness of advance care planning practices and their participation in such practices is low across care settings. Although nurses have a positive attitude toward advance care planning, there are challenges (e.g. insufficient time to conduct advance care planning discussions and lack of relevant knowledge and skills) that impede their participation in practice. Where and on whom will the research have an impact? This study may serve as a foundation for nursing societies in countries, where advance care planning is emerging, to discuss strategies to increase nurses' competency in advance care planning and promote their participation in the practice. The STROBE checklist was followed. No patient or public contribution.

Multidisciplinary approach to advance care planning and directives in patients with end-stage renal disease: a point of view on patient-centered decision-making.

Implementing Advance Care Planning (ACP) for patients with End-Stage Kidney Disease (ESKD), particularly in the context of hemodialysis, presents significant challenges. Despite existing legal frameworks, disparities in advance care planning practices are evident across Europe. The present perspective introduces a multidisciplinary model, initiated in 2019. This model incorporates a specialized team comprising a nephrologist, a psychologist, a palliative care specialist, and an anesthesiologist/intensivist. Through this collaborative approach, we aimed to comprehensively address the intricate medical, emotional, and psychological dimensions in advance care planning. In this point of view, we discuss the strengths of our model, its potential for European Nephrology, and advocate for guidelines to enhance advance care planning implementation within the nephrology community.

Development of a score model to predict long-term prognosis after community-onset pneumonia in older patients.

The identification of factors associated with long-term prognosis after community-onset pneumonia in elderly patients should be considered when initiating advance care planning (ACP). We aimed to identify these factors and develop a prediction score model. Patients aged 65 years and older, who were hospitalized for pneumonia at nine collaborating institutions, were included. The prognosis of patients 180 days after the completion of antimicrobial treatment for pneumonia was prospectively collected. The total number of analysable cases was 399, excluding 7 outliers and 42 cases with missing data or unknown prognosis. These cases were randomly divided in an 8:2 ratio for score development and testing. The median age was 82 years, and there were 68 (17%) deaths. A multivariate analysis showed that significant factors were performance status (PS) ≥2 (Odds ratio [OR], 11.78), hypoalbuminemia ≤2.5 g/dL (OR, 5.28) and dementia (OR, 3.15), while age and detection of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria were not associated with prognosis. A scoring model was then developed with PS ≥2, Alb ≤2.5, and dementia providing scores of 2, 1 and 1 each, respectively, for a total of 4. The area under the curve was 0.8504, and the sensitivity and specificity were 94.6% and 61.7% at the cutoff of 2, respectively. In the test cases, the sensitivity and specificity were 91.7% and 63.1%, respectively, at a cutoff value of 2. Patients meeting this score should be considered near the end of life, and the initiation of ACP practices should be considered.

What makes advance care planning discussion so difficult? A systematic review of the factors of advance care planning in healthcare settings.

Existing systematic reviews related to advance care planning (ACP) largely focus on specific groups and intervention efficacy or are limited to contextual factors. This research aims to identify the modifiable factors perceived by different users of ACP in healthcare settings and inform healthcare professionals about the factors affecting ACP practice. Five English-language databases (ProQuest, PubMed, CINAHL Plus, Scopus, and Medline) and two Chinese-language databases (CNKI and NCL) were searched up to November 2022. Empirical research identifying factors related to ACP in healthcare settings was included. ACP is defined as a discussion process on future end-of-life care. Thematic synthesis was performed on all included studies. A total of 1871 unique articles were screened; the full texts of 193 were assessed by 4 reviewers, and 45 articles were included for analysis. Twenty-two (54%) studies were qualitative, 15 (33%) were quantitative, and 6 (13%) used mixed methods. Foci varied from 28 (62%) studies on a single subject group (either patient, family, or physician), 11 (25%) on 2 subject groups (either patient and family or patient and healthcare professional), and 6 (13%) covered 3 subject groups (patient, family, and healthcare professional). Among the 17 studies involving more than 1 subject group, only 2 adopted a dyadic lens in analysis. Complex interwoven factors were categorized into (1) intrapersonal factors, (2) interpersonal factors, and (3) socio-environmental factors, with a total of 11 themes: personal belief, emotions, the burden on others, timing, responsiveness, relationship, family dynamics, experience, person taking the lead, culture, and support. Patients, families, and healthcare professionals are the essential stakeholders of ACP in healthcare settings. Factors are interweaved among the intrapersonal, interpersonal, and socio-environmental dimensions. Research is warranted to examine the dynamic interactions of the 3 essential stakeholders from a multidimensional perspective, and the mechanism of the interweaving of factors.

Nurses' intention and attitude to participate in advance care planning: An extended theory of planned behaviour using structural equation modelling–A cross‐sectional study

AbstractAimsThis study aimed to investigate the factors influencing nurses' intentions to participate in advance care planning (ACP) by examining the mediating roles of attitude, subjective norm, and perceived behavioural control in the relationship between knowledge and intention, using an extended theory of planned behaviour and structural equation modelling.MethodsA descriptive cross‐sectional survey was conducted between January and April 2023, involving 515 registered nurses, selected through two‐stage sampling. Data were collected using a self‐administered online survey distributed via the internal communication system of hospital. Structural equation Modelling was employed to analyse the relationships among knowledge, attitude, subjective norm, perceived behavioural control and intention to participate in ACP.ResultsThe results supported two hypotheses regarding the relationships between knowledge, attitude, subjective norm, perceived behavioural control, and intention (p < 0.05). While the direct effect of knowledge on intention was not significant (β = 0.087, p = 0.292), the total indirect effect through attitude, subjective norm and perceived behavioural control was significant (β = 0.449, p < 0.001), accounting for approximately 83.77% of the total effect on intention. This underscores the critical role of these mediators in influencing nurses' intention to participate in ACP.ConclusionsThis study highlights the significant indirect influence of knowledge on nurses' intentions to participate in ACP through attitude, subjective norms and perceived behavioural control. These findings suggest that targeted educational is needed to enhance ACP participation among nurses.Implications for the Profession and/or Patient CareUnderstanding the role of attitude, subjective norm and perceived behavioural control can enhance nursing practice. Creating supportive environments and promoting interdisciplinary collaboration are crucial. Professional development through training, mentorship and role modelling can empower nurses in ACP. Comprehensive programs that increase knowledge and foster positive attitudes are essential for advancing ACP practice among nurses.ImpactEducational programs aimed at nurses should include components designed to strengthen knowledge and the identified mediators, equipping nurses with the necessary ACP skills. Organizational support through appropriate policy frameworks can facilitate these educational endeavours and ensure a sustainable impact on practice.Reporting MethodThe Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) checklist for cross‐sectional studies.

Barriers perceived by advance care planning (ACP) facilitators in nursing and welfare professions in implementing ACP: An online survey

This study aimed to elucidate the barriers perceived by Advance Care Planning (ACP) facilitators in nursing and welfare professions when implementing ACP in practice. An online survey using Google Forms was conducted between December 2021 and January 2022. The survey targeted 220 individuals, including 82 who completed the Hiroshima Prefecture ACP Promotion Training in 2020 and 138 ACP Promotion Collaborators in Fukuyama City, Hiroshima Prefecture. In addition to the respondents' attributes, the survey asked about the importance of 37 items related to barriers to ACP implementation, using a 7-point scale. We compared two groups: nurses and physicians ("nurses/physicians") and other medical and nursing care professionals ("nursing care professionals, etc."). Responses were obtained from 67 participants (response rate: 34.4%). The barriers to ACP perceived by nursing care professionals were as follows: 1) lack of knowledge about ACP, 2) belief that other professions are more suitable for implementing ACP than themselves, and 3) difficulty in realizing intentions due to institutional and environmental factors. Nurses and physicians perceived lack of time as an important barrier. Measures such as 1) clarifying how different professions should be involved in ACP, 2) expanding educational opportunities tailored to each profession, 3) utilizing tools to support the decision-making process in ACP, and 4) establishing an information-sharing system infrastructure are considered to be effective in promoting the implementation of ACP by facilitators in the nursing and welfare professions. By implementing measures to address the barriers identified in this study, it is expected that the practice of ACP by facilitators in nursing and welfare professions will be promoted, and ACP will become more widespread in the community.

Situation, Education, Innovation, and Recommendation: A Large-Scale Systematic Review of Advance Care Planning in the Age of COVID-19.

The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the need for advance care planning (ACP) as a way to help mitigate the various care concerns that accompanied the healthcare crisis. However, unique obstacles to typical ACP practice necessitated the need for guidance and innovation to help facilitate these vital conversations. The aim of this systematic review was to identify the various ACP barriers and facilitators that arose during the pandemic and determine how ACP practice was affected across different contexts and among different populations. This systematic review (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42022359092), which adheres to the PRISMA guidelines for reporting systematic reviews, examined studies on ACP in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. The review involved searches of five databases, including MEDLINE and Embase. Of the 843 identified studies, 115 met the inclusion criteria. The extracted ACP barriers and facilitators were codified and quantified. The most frequently occurring ACP barrier codes were: Social distancing measures and visitation restrictions, Uncertainty surrounding the COVID-19 prognosis, and Technological/Telehealth barriers. The most frequently occurring ACP facilitator codes were the following: Telehealth/virtual ACP platforms, Training for clinicians, and Care team collaboration. Identifying the ACP barriers and facilitators is essential for developing effective, resilient ACP promotion strategies and improving its delivery, accessibility, and acceptability.

Summary of evidence to facilitate the implementation of advance care planning among advanced cancer patients.

Advance care planning (ACP) is designed to ensure that patients lacking autonomous decision-making capacity receive medical services in accordance with their expectations and preferences. Individuals with advanced cancer are a crucial target for ACP implementation. However, the current practice of ACP in this group in China is suboptimal, demanding high-quality implementation evidence to strengthen ACP in the clinical practice of patients with advanced cancer. The existing literature can be summarized into 27 pieces of evidence across 7 dimensions, including initiation time, intervention content, intervention providers, intervention modalities, communication skills, outcome indicators, and environmental support. The aforementioned evidence could provide crucial support for improving ACP implementation for patients with advanced cancer. Subsequent research efforts should integrate patient preferences and explore the most suitable implementation strategies for ACP in the Chinese population with advanced cancer, considering diverse aspects such as traditional culture, ACP education and training, legislative support, and healthcare system refinement.

Reliability and Validation Study of Advance Care Planning Practice Scale among Health and Social Care Professionals.

Advance care planning (ACP) is a crucial process in clinical practice, enabling individuals to articulate their care preferences and goals, with significant implications for future healthcare. However, ACP practice of health and social care professionals (HSCPs) concerning patients, or their family members are rarely explored. The objective of the study was to adapt and validate a four-item scale assessing ACP practices of HSCPs toward patients or their family members. The ACP Practice Scale was evaluated through a cross-sectional online survey administered to HSCPs in Macao, assessing its factor structure, validity, and reliability. Based on a sample of 186 valid responses, the ACP Practice Scale demonstrated satisfactory levels of validity and reliability among HSPCs in Macao. The four-item scale explained 65.87% of the variance in ACP practice and exhibited strong internal consistency, with Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's omega coefficients of 0.82. Furthermore, item factor loadings ranged from 0.71 to 0.90. The ACP Practice Scale provides reliable and valid measurements of ACP practice among HSCPs. This instrument can help to enhance our understanding of ACP practices in clinical settings and support the advancement of advance care planning.

Gender and couple status differences in advance care planning: a cross-sectional study.

Past studies have shown mixed results on how gender and living with a spouse or partner impact advance care planning (ACP). Few if any have tested for the interaction between these two variables. We examined how gender and couple status interact to impact the use of ACP practices including written instructions, designating a durable power of attorney for healthcare (DPOAHC), and discussing one's decisions with others. We used cross-sectional data taken from the Health and Retirement Study, a longitudinal study of adults over the age of 50 in the United States. Data are from 632 respondents who died between the 2016 core survey and the 2018 exit survey. Participants had completed the 2016 survey and had a proxy informant complete the 2018 exit survey after their death. Generalized linear mixed models were used to test for main effects and interactions. Women were more likely than men to designate a DPOAHC and to discuss their wishes with others. Women living without a partner were more likely than men living without a partner and coupled households to discuss their wishes with family or others. Both gender and couple status are important variables associated with ACP practices. Healthcare providers may want to reach out to women living within a coupled household and men living without a partner to ensure that they know the benefits of ACP.

Oncology nurses' knowledge, attitudes, and practice behaviours towards advance care planning: A nationwide cross-sectional study

BackgroundWith the increasing cancer prevalence in China, discussions surrounding end-of-life care have become more frequent within the purview of oncology nursing. Nonetheless, limited research has explored the current state of Advance Care Planning (ACP) among oncology nurses in China. Hence, it is essential to comprehensively assesses oncology nurses' ACP knowledge, attitudes, and practice behaviours, addressing existing literature gaps and revealing China's oncology nursing ACP status. ObjectivesTo explore oncology nurses' knowledge, attitudes, and practice behaviours regarding ACP and identify factors impacting ACP practice behaviours. DesignA multi-centre, observational, cross-sectional study. SettingsThe research is conducted in oncology hospitals across 22 provinces, 4 municipalities, and 5 autonomous regions across China. ParticipantsConvenience sampling was used to recruit 1800 registered oncology nurses. MethodsData were collected via an electronic questionnaire between December 2021 and January 2022. Univariate and hierarchical multiple regression analyses were used for data prediction (P < 0.05). ResultsIn the knowledge section, respondents achieved an average accuracy rate of 51.94 % and demonstrated moderate positive attitudes towards ACP. Their practice behaviour scores were moderately graded. Sociodemographic characteristics and attitude were included as predictors of practice behaviour in the hierarchical multiple regression analysis, explaining 12.2 % and 31.1 % of the variance, respectively. The final model accounted for 43.3 % of the variance. The results indicated that attitudes had a significant and positive impact on practice behaviours, indicating that nurses with more positive attitudes were more likely to engage in ACP practice. ConclusionsChinese oncology nurses seem to have more positive attitudes towards ACP, but they do not prepare adequately in practice. By enhancing workplace values, beliefs, and policies, it is feasible to enhance the attitudes of oncology nurses towards ACP and, consequently, promote practice behaviours. Furthermore, this study underscores the need for targeted interventions to bridge the gap between positive attitudes and actual ACP implementation among oncology nurses in China.

Practice Patterns of Medical Oncologists: A Survey of Advance Care Planning in the Outpatient Setting

Introduction. Advance care planning (ACP) is an important part of cancer care. We determined the ACP practice patterns of medical oncologists at our academic cancer centre in Canada. Methods. Medical oncologists were invited to participate in a questionnaire in August 2019. Questions were validated by a local survey expert. Twelve multiple-choice questions were included. Results. Seventeen of the 23 eligible oncologists responded. 64% were male, and 76% were in practice for &lt;16 years. Common tumour sites treated by respondents included breast (53%), lung (24%), gastrointestinal (24%), and genitourinary (24%) cancers. Oncologists responded that components of ACP included designating a substitute decision-maker (100%), determining goals of care (100%), making decisions about cardiopulmonary resuscitation (94%), and disposition of property/finances (88%). They discuss ACP with curable vs. incurable patients 6% vs. 93% of the time. While 88% of oncologists reported it would be desirable to initiate ACP discussions in the first 3 visits, in the incurable setting, only 29% reported doing so. Patient characteristics that prompt oncologists to discuss ACP in the first 3 visits in the curative vs. incurable settings include elderly age (23% vs. 59%), poor performance status (47% vs. 88%), and short prognosis (47% vs. 88%). Oncologists thought the most appropriate time to discuss ACP in the curative setting was at the time the patient initiates it (35%), and during visits 2-3 in the incurable setting (41%). The most common barriers to discussing ACP include insufficient time (71%) and too much information for the patient (71%). Conclusions. While medical oncologists believe that discussing ACP with cancer patients in the first few outpatient visits is important, this seldom occurs due to the presence of several barriers.

Advance Care Planning Practice Patterns Before and During a Pandemic.

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in introspection of the United States health care infrastructure, especially with advance care planning (ACP). Methods: This is a retrospective chart review assessing the frequency of ACP discussions and formal documents reflecting ACP wishes in an outpatient palliative medicine (PM) practice. The study site was at University Medical Center New Orleans from pre-COVID-19 surge (November 2019-February 2020) to months during and post-COVID-19 surge (March-April 2020). Results: Results showed an increase in ACP discussions during the post-COVID-19 months. Patients seen during the surge and post-COVID-19 months were more likely to discuss medical power of attorney (odds ratio [OR] = 1.78, p = 0.045) and preferred code status (OR = 2.82, p < 0.001). Conclusion: Our study showed that more ACP discussions were conducted post-COVID-19 versus pre-COVID-19. However, formal documents reflecting these wishes were lacking. These results can help guide ACP use in crisis periods and improve understanding of ACP discussions in an outpatient PM clinic.