Ppm For Chemical Shifts Research Articles

Revisiting structure of silica gels from water glass: an 1H and 29Si MAS and CP-MAS NMR study

The silica gels, derived from water glass solution with pH adjusted at 3.0 and 9.9, were revisited to investigate their constitution, although water glass has been studied for last tens of decades on gelation. Solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy was applied to the nuclei 1H and 29Si, by the use of magic angle spinning (MAS), 1H → 29Si CP-MAS (CP: cross-polarization), and modern techniques such as 2D HETCOR (two dimensional heteronuclear correlation), and variable-contact time CP techniques. Gelation time (tgel) showed U-letter shape dependence on pH. All gels consisted of Qn groups (n: 2, 3, and 4), where Qn stands for a silicate unite [(O1/2)nSi (–O−)4−n] (n: 0–4). The analysis of the 1H → 29Si CP kinetics and 1H-29Si HETCOR spectra elucidated the presence of four kinds of 1H nuclei, i.e., those giving a peak at 6.9 ppm in chemical shift δ: 1H–OSi hydrogen bonded to H2O molecules; one at 4.3 ppm: 1H of adsorbed water molecules, hydrogen-bonded to the silanol groups; one at 1.7 ppm: 1H–OSi confined in the gel lattice, including that forming aggregations like Si–OH/NaO–Si; and one at 4.2 ppm: 1H of water molecules on the outermost hydration layer.

Density functional theory (DFT) calculations of the proton nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spin-Hamiltonian parameters for serine

1H nuclear magnetic resonance spin-Hamiltonian parameters: chemical shifts δ and indirect spin–spin coupling constants J, have been calculated for serine, a brain metabolite. Serine molecules in the gas-phase as well as in solution in water have been investigated using density functional theory. Solvent and conformer effects as well as zero-point vibrational corrections have been taken into account. For the non-vibrating molecule, the best agreement is obtained when solvent and conformer effects are included. Zero-point vibrational corrections improve the agreement with experimental values, leading to a root mean square deviation of 0.05 ppm for chemical shifts and 0.7 Hz for spin–spin coupling constants.