Pouch Survival Research Articles

What Is the Optimal Strategy for Pouch Salvage at Time of Redo Ileal-Pouch Anal Anastomosis? Pouch Repair with Reanastomosis vs Pouch Excision with Neopouch.

The long-term risk of pouch failure after restorative proctocolectomy with ileal-pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) range from 5% to 15%. Salvage surgery for failing IPAA may be achieved by disconnecting the IPAA and either repairing and reusing the existing pouch (REP) or constructing a neopouch (NEO). We aimed to evaluate whether there are differences in long-term functional pouch survival and functional outcomes between the REP group and the NEO group. We hypothesized that patients undergoing REP have higher long-term pouch survival rates compared with patients who require NEO pouch construction. Our prospectively maintained Pouch Registry was queried for patients who underwent a pouch salvage surgery with either pouch REP or NEO from 1988 to 2020. Patients who underwent pouch repair without disconnection from the anus were excluded. The primary endpoint was long-term pouch survival after redo pouch surgery. Secondary outcomes were patient-reported quality of life and pouch function. Of 653 patients undergoing redo IPAA, 462 met inclusion criteria of transabdominal redo surgery with pouch reconnection: 243 (52.6%) had REP and 219 (47.4%) had NEO. Median age was 39 years and 59% were women. Median time between index and redo IPAA was 34 months for REP vs 54 months for NEO (p = 0.002). The 5-year pouch survival after redo IPAA was similar between REP (79.5%) and NEO (76.8%) groups (p = 0.4). Fewer patients in the REP group reported nighttime pad use (51.4% vs 68.2%, p = 0.04). Pouch survival and functional outcomes after salvage surgery for failing ileoanal pouch was similar regardless of pouch salvage procedure. When performing redo pouch surgery, surgeons should not hesitate to construct a new pouch if indicated.

Clinical and histological impact of diffuse inflammation at pouchoscopy

PurposeThe anatomical location of inflammation in and around the ileal pouch affects the pouch survival rate, and diffuse inflammation has poor pouch survival rates. We aimed to clarify the symptoms and histological findings of diffuse inflammation of the pouch.MethodsWe evaluated the symptoms, treatment, and histological findings according to the endoscopic phenotypes of diffuse inflammation, focal inflammation, and normal as the pouch body phenotype and afferent limb involvement, inlet involvement, cuffitis, and fistula as the peripheral findings.ResultsOf the 318 pouchoscopies, 47 had diffuse inflammation, 201 had focal inflammation, and 70 were normal. Symptomatic patients had diffuse inflammation more frequently (46.8%) than focal inflammation (13.4%) and normal (14.2%), with no difference between focal inflammation and normal. Antibiotics and steroids were higher rate administered in cases of diffuse inflammation, but not in cases of focal inflammation or in normal cases. Histological inflammation, inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)–specific finding, and colonic metaplasia showed severity in the order of diffuse inflammation > focal inflammation > normal. The number of peripheral inflammatory findings overlapped in the following order: diffuse inflammation > focal inflammation > normal. The number of symptomatic patients increased as the number of peripheral inflammatory findings increased.ConclusionPouches with diffuse inflammation are more symptomatic, have a higher use of therapeutic agents, and have more severe histological inflammation, IBD-specific finding, and colonic metaplasia accompanying peripheral inflammatory findings than the other groups. The higher the overlap of inflammatory findings in the surrounding tissues, the more symptomatic the patients will appear.

Ileoanal pouch salvage rates with endoluminal vacuum therapy for early vs late anastomotic leaks

BackgroundAnastomotic leaks after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) significantly compromise patient outcomes and increase healthcare resource utilization. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of endoluminal vacuum therapy (EndoVac) for pouch leaks. We hypothesized that EndoVac for early compared with late leaks was associated with a higher pouch survival rate. MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed consecutive pouch anastomotic leaks treated with EndoVac therapy at our institution between 2013 and 2023. Patients were stratified into early (≤30 days) and late (>30 days) leak groups. Anastomotic healing was defined as complete closure of the leak site and resolution of symptoms. Pouch failure was defined as a permanent ileostomy or pouch excision. The probability of pouch survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. ResultsA total of 14 patients with IPAA were included: median age, 34 years; 71% were males; and median body mass index, 23.46 kg/m2. The following were the diagnoses made: ulcerative colitis (n = 12) and familial adenomatous polyposis (n = 2). The median (IQR) time from pouch construction to leak was 44.5 (12−192) days; of these, 6 (43%) were early, and 8 (57%) were late. All (100%) leaks were at the anastomosis; all (100%) were diverted at the time of EndoVac therapy: 10 (71%) still diverted, and 4 (29%) rediverted. Patients underwent a median of 5.5 EndoVac changes (3−7) over a 13.5 (6−21) day period from initiation of treatment to cessation of therapy. After EndoVac therapy, healing was observed in 10 (71%) patients; 2 of whom required a minor handsewn anastomotic revision but healed completely, and 4 did not heal; 3 had pouch excision, and 1 underwent redo pouch surgery. Anastomotic healing (66.7% vs 75%, P = .7) and pouch survival (83.3% vs 75%, P = .73) were not significantly different between the early and late leak groups. The overall pouch salvage rate was 78.5%. ConclusionEndoVac therapy was effective in achieving high rates of pouch salvage and anastomotic healing in patients with ileoanal pouch leaks, irrespective of the timing of intervention postoperatively. This supports the use of EndoVac as a viable treatment option for both early and late anastomotic leaks.

Long-term ileoanal pouch survival after pouch urinary tract fistulae

BackgroundIleoanal pouch is a demanding procedure with many potential technical complications including bladder or ureteral injury, while inflammation or stricture of the anastomosis or anal transition zone may lead to the formation of strictures and fistulae, including to the adjacent urethra. Pouch urinary tract fistulae are rare. We aimed to describe the presentation, diagnostic workup, and management of patients with pouch urinary at our center.MethodsOur prospectively maintained pouch registry was queried using diagnostic codes and natural language processing free-text searches to identify ileoanal pouch patients diagnosed with any pouch-urinary tract fistula from 1997 to 2022. Descriptive statistics and pouch survival using Kaplan–Meier curves are presented. Numbers represent frequency (proportion) or median (range).ResultsOver 25 years, urinary fistulae were observed 27 pouch patients; of these, 16 of the index pouches were performed at our institution [rate 0.3% (16/5236)]. Overall median age was 42 (27–62) years, and 92.3% of the patients were male. Fistula locations included pouch-urethra in 13 patients (48.1%), pouch-bladder in 12 patients (44.4%), and anal-urethra in 2 (7.4%). The median time from pouch to fistula was 7.0 (0.3–38) years. Pouch excision and end ileostomy were performed in 12 patients (bladder fistula, n = 3; urethral fistula, n = 9), while redo ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) was performed in 5 patients (bladder fistula, n = 3; urethral fistula, n = 2). The 5-year overall pouch survival after fistula to the bladder was 58.3% vs. 33.3% with urethral fistulae (p = 0.25).ConclusionPouch-urinary tract fistulae are a rare, morbid, and difficult to treat complication of ileoanal pouch that requires a multidisciplinary, often staged, surgical approach. In the long term, pouches with bladder fistulae were more likely to be salvaged than pouches with urethral fistulae.

Outcome of incidental versus preoperatively diagnosed colorectal cancer during total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for inflammatory bowel disease.

Total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the treatment of choice for colorectal cancer (CRC) in inflammatory bowel disease. CRC may also be discovered incidentally at IPAA for other indications. We sought to determine whether incidentally found CRC at IPAA was associated with worse outcomes. Our institutional pouch registry (1983-2021) was retrospectively reviewed. Patients with CRC at pathology after IPAA were divided into two groups: a preoperative diagnosis (PreD) group and an incidental diagnosis (InD) group. Their long-term outcomes (overall survival, disease-free survival and pouch survival) were compared. We included 164 patients: 53 (32%) InD and 111 (68%) PreD. There were no differences in cancer staging, differentiation and location. After a median follow-up of 11 (IQR 3-25) years for InD and 9 (IQR 3-20) years for the PreD group, deaths were 14 (26%) in the InD group and 18 (16%) in the PreD group. Pouch failures were five (9%) in the InD group and nine (8%) in the PreD group, of which two (5%) and four (4%) were cancer related. Ten-year overall survival was 94% for InD and 89% for PreD (P = 0.41), disease-free survival was 95% for InD and 90% for PreD (P = 0.685) and pouch survival was 89% for InD and 97% for PreD (P = 0.80). Pouch survival at 10 years was lower in rectal versus colon cancer (87% vs. 97%, P = 0.01). No difference was found in outcomes in handsewn versus stapled anastomoses. Inflammatory bowel disease patients with incidentally found CRC during IPAA appear to have similarly excellent oncological and pouch outcomes to patients with a preoperative cancer diagnosis.

Rediversion of the Failing Ileoanal Pouch: First Step in Pouch Salvage?

Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is a technically demanding procedure with many potential complications. Rediversion with an ileostomy is often the first step in pouch salvage; however, it may not be clear if an individual patient will undergo subsequent pouch salvage surgery. We aimed to describe the indications and short- and long-term outcomes of rediversion in our pouch registry. We queried our institutional pouch registry for patients who underwent index 2- or 3-stage IPAA and subsequent rediversion at our institution between 1985 and 2022. Pouches constructed elsewhere, rediverted elsewhere, or those patients who underwent pouch salvage/excision without prior rediversion were excluded. Patients were selected for pouch salvage according to the surgeon's discretion. Overall, 177 patients (3.4% of 5207 index pouches) were rediverted. At index pouch, median patient age was 32 years and 50.8% were women. Diagnoses included ulcerative colitis (86.4%), indeterminate colitis (6.2%), familial adenomatous polyposis (4.0%), and others (3.4%). Median time from prior ileostomy closure to rediversion was 7.2 years. Indications for rediversion were inflammatory in 98 (55.4%) and noninflammatory in 79 (44.6%) patients. After rediversion, 52% underwent pouch salvage, 30% had no further surgery, and 18.1% underwent pouch excision. The 5-year pouch survival rates for inflammatory and noninflammatory indications were 71.5% and 94.5%, respectively (P = .02). Rediversion of ileoanal pouches is a safe initial strategy to manage failing pouches and is a useful first step in pouch salvage in many patients. Subsequent salvage surgery for noninflammatory indications had a significantly higher pouch salvage rate than those rediverted for inflammatory complications.

Redo IPAA for long rectal cuff syndrome after ileoanal pouch for inflammatory bowel disease.

BACKGROUND: When constructing an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA), the rectal cuff should ideally be 1-2cm long to avoid subsequent complications. We identified patients from our IBD center who underwent redo IPAA for a long rectal cuff. Long rectal cuff syndrome (LRCS) was defined as a symptomatic rectal cuff ≥ 4cm. Forty patients met the inclusion criteria: 42.5% female, median age at redo surgery 42.5years. The presentation was ulcerative proctitis in 77.5% of the cases and outlet obstruction in 22.5%. The index pouch was laparoscopically performed in 18 patients (45%). The median rectal cuff length was 6cm. The pouch was repaired in 16 (40%) cases, whereas 24 (60%) required the creation of a neo-pouch. At the final pathology, the rectal cuff showed chronic active colitis in 38 (90%) cases. After a median follow-up of 34.5 (IQR 12-109) months, pouch failure occurred in 9 (22.5%) cases. The pouch survival rate was 78% at 3years. Data on the quality of life were available for 11 (27.5%) patients at a median of 75months after redo surgery. The median QoL score (0-1) was 0.7 (0.4-0.9). LRCS, a potentially avoidable complication, presents uniformly with symptoms of ulcerative proctitis or stricture. Redo IPAA was restorative for the majority.

Third Time's the Charm? Indications and Outcomes for Redo-Redo IPAA.

Up to 20% to 40% cases of redo IPAA procedures will result in pouch failure. Whether to offer a second redo procedure to maintain intestinal continuity remains a controversial decision. To report our institutional experience of second redo IPAA procedures. This was a retrospective review. Patient-reported outcomes were compared between patients undergoing second redo procedures and those undergoing first redo procedures using propensity score matching to balance the 2 cohorts. Tertiary referral center. Patients who underwent second redo IPAA procedures between 2004 and 2021 were included in this study. Second redo IPAA. Pouch survival and patient-reported outcomes were measured using the Cleveland Global Quality of Life survey. Twenty-three patients were included (65% women), 20 (87%) with an index diagnosis of ulcerative colitis and 3 (13%) with indeterminate colitis. The final diagnosis was changed to Crohn's disease in 8 (35%) cases. The indication for pouch salvage was the same for the first and second redo procedures in 21 (91%) cases: 20 (87%) patients had both redo IPAAs for septic complications. After a median follow-up of 39 months (interquartile range, 18.5-95.5 months), pouch failure occurred in 8 (30%) cases (7 cases due to sepsis, of whom 3 never had their stoma closed, and 1 case due to poor function); all patients who experienced pouch failure underwent the second redo procedure due to septic complications. Overall pouch survival at 3 years was 76%: 62.5% in patients with a final diagnosis of Crohn's disease versus 82.5% in patients with ulcerative/indeterminate colitis ( p = 0.09). Overall quality-of-life score (0-1) was 0.6 (0.5-0.8). Quality of life and functional outcomes were comparable between first and second redo procedures, except incontinence, which was higher in second redo procedures. Single-center retrospective review. A second pouch salvage procedure may be offered with acceptable outcomes to selected patients with high motivation to keep intestinal continuity. See Video Abstract . ANTECEDENTES:Hasta un 20-40% de los casos de rehacer anastomosis anal con bolsa ileal (IPAA) resultarán en falla de la bolsa. La posibilidad de ofrecer un segundo procedimiento para mantener la continuidad intestinal sigue siendo una decisión controvertida.OBJETIVO:Reportar nuestra experiencia institucional de una segunda re-confección de la anastomosis anal con bolsa ileal.DISEÑO:Revisión retrospectiva; los resultados informados por los pacientes se compararon entre los pacientes que se sometieron a una segunda re-confeccion con los de los pacientes que se sometieron a una la primera re-confeccion utilizando el puntaje de propensión para equilibrar las dos cohortes.AJUSTES ENTORNO CLINICO:Centro de referencia terciario.PACIENTES:Pacientes que se sometieron a una segunda re-confeccion de de la anastomosis anal con bolsa ileal entre 2004 y 2021.INTERVENCIONES:Segunda re-confeccion de la anastomosis anal con bolsa ileal.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Supervivencia de la bolsa, resultados informados por los pacientes medidos mediante la encuesta Cleveland Global Quality of Life.RESULTADOS:Se incluyeron veintitrés pacientes (65% mujeres), 20 (87%) con diagnóstico inicial de colitis ulcerosa y 3 (13%) con colitis indeterminada. El diagnóstico final se cambió a enfermedad de Crohn en ocho (35%) casos. La indicación para el rescate de la bolsa fue la misma para la primera y segunda re-confeccion en 21 (91%) casos: 20 (87%) pacientes tuvieron ambas re-confecciones de la anastomosis anal con bolsa ileal por complicaciones sépticas. Después de una mediana de seguimiento de 39 meses (RIC 18,5 - 95,5), se produjo falla de la bolsa en 8 (30%) casos (7 casos debido a sepsis, de los cuales 3 nunca cerraron el estoma y 1 caso debido a una mala función); todos los pacientes que experimentaron falla de la bolsa se sometieron a una segunda re-confeccion debido a complicaciones sépticas. La supervivencia global de la bolsa a los 3 años fue del 76%: 62,5% en pacientes con diagnóstico final de enfermedad de Crohn, versus 82,5% en colitis ulcerativa/indeterminada ( p = 0,09). La puntuación general de calidad de vida (0 -1) fue 0,6 (0,5 - 0,8). La calidad de vida y los resultados funcionales fueron comparables entre la primera y la segunda re-confeccion, excepto la incontinencia, que fue mayor en la segunda re-confeccion.LIMITACIONES:Revisión retrospectiva de un solo centro.CONCLUSIONES:Se puede ofrecer un segundo procedimiento de rescate de la bolsa con resultados aceptables a pacientes seleccionados con alta motivación para mantener la continuidad intestinal. (Traducción- Dr. Francisco M. Abarca-Rendon ).

Routine diversion following delayed IPAA construction does not reduce the incidence of pouch-related sepsis or failure in patients with ulcerative colitis.

The aim of this study was to compare modified 2-stage and 3-stage IPAA construction techniques to evaluate the effect of diverting loop ileostomy following completion proctectomy and IPAA for ulcerative colitis. In addition, our overall institutional experience was reviewed to describe long-term outcomes and changes in staging trends over time. Our institutional database was searched to identify all cases of IPAA for ulcerative colitis between 1981 and 2018. Patient, pouch and outcome characteristics were abstracted. Primary study outcomes were the incidence of primary pouch failure and pouch-related sepsis. Failure was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier estimates of survival over time. The adjusted effect of pouch stage was evaluated using multivariable Cox and logistic regression models. Exploratory analysis evaluated the effect of stage on failure in the pouch related sepsis subgroup. A total of 2105 patients underwent primary IPAA over the study period. The 5, 10 and 20-year pouch survival probabilities were 95.2%, 92.7% and 86.6%. The incidence of pouch related sepsis was 12.3%. Adjusted analysis demonstrated no difference in pouch failure (HR = 0.64: 95% 0.39-1.07, p = 0.09) or post-operative sepsis (aOR = 0.79: 95% CI 0.53-1.17, p = 0.24) by stage of construction. Among patients experiencing pouch sepsis, there was no difference in Kaplan-Meier estimates of pouch survival by stage (p = 0.90). Pouch related sepsis and IPAA failure did not differ between modified 2-stage and 3-stage construction techniques. Among the sub-group of patients experiencing pouch related sepsis, there was no difference in failure between groups. The results suggest diverting ileostomy may be safely avoided following delayed pouch reconstruction in appropriately selected patients.

Incidental Dysplasia During Total Proctocolectomy With Ileoanal Pouch: Is It Associated With Worse Outcomes?

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at increased risk of colorectal cancer. In cases of invisible or nonendoscopically resectable dysplasia found at colonoscopy, total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis can be offered with good long-term outcomes; however, little is known regarding cancer-related outcomes when dysplasia is found incidentally after surgery on final pathology. Using our prospectively collected pouch registry, we identified patients who had preoperative colonic dysplasia or dysplasia found only after colectomy. Patients with cancer preoperatively or after colectomy were excluded. Included patients were divided into 3 groups: PRE (+preoperative biopsy, negative final pathology), BOTH (+preoperative biopsy and final pathology), and POST (negative preoperative biopsy, +final pathology). Long-term outcomes in the 3 groups were assessed. In total, 517 patients were included: PRE = 125, BOTH = 254, POST = 137. After a median follow-up of 12 years (IQR 3-21), there were no differences in overall, disease-free, or pouch survival between groups. Cancer/dysplasia developed in 11 patients: 3 (2%) in the PRE, 5 (2%) in the BOTH, and 3 (2%) in the POST group. Only 1 cancer-related death occurred in the entire cohort (PRE group). Disease-free survival at 10 years was 98% for all groups (P = .97). Pouch survival at 10 years was 96% for PRE, 99% for BOTH, and 97% for POST (P = .24). The incidental finding of dysplasia on final pathology after proctocolectomy was not associated with worsened outcomes compared with preoperatively diagnosed dysplasia.

Redo ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for early versus late sepsis-related pouch failure

BackgroundPouch failure after restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch–anal anastomosis occurs in 5% to 15% of cases, mostly due to septic complications. We aimed to determine if the timing of pouch failure impacted long-term outcomes for redo ileal pouch–anal anastomosis after sepsis-related complications. MethodWe retrospectively analyzed our prospectively collected institutional pouch database. Patients who underwent redo ileal pouch–anal anastomosis for septic complications between 1988 and 2020 were divided into an early (pouch failure within 6 months of stoma closure after index operation, or stoma never closed) and a late failure group (pouch failure after 6 months of stoma closure). The primary endpoint was pouch survival. ResultsIn total, 335 patients were included: 241 (72%) in the early and 94 (28%) in the late failure group. The most common indication for failure was an anastomotic leak in the early failure group (163, 68%) and fistula in the late failure group (59, 63%), P < .001. Pouch survival at 3, 5, and 10 years was 77%, 75%, and 72% for the early and 79%, 75%, and 68% for the late failure group (P = .94). The most common reason for redo pouch failure was fistula in both groups. Quality of life was similar in both groups. In multivariate analysis, the only factor associated with pouch failure was the final diagnosis of Crohn's disease. ConclusionOutcomes after redo ileal pouch–anal anastomosis were comparable between patients with early and late sepsis-related index pouch failure, with acceptable rates of long-term pouch survival and good quality of life.

Ileal Pouch-anal Anastomosis in Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis-inflammatory Bowel Disease (PSC-IBD): Long-term Pouch and Liver Transplant Outcomes.

To compare the effect of liver transplantation (LT) on ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) outcomes in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis and inflammatory bowel disease (PSC-IBD). Patients with PSC-IBD may require both IPAA for colitis and LT for PSC. Patients with PSC-IBD from out institutional pouch registry (1985-2022) were divided according to LT status and timing of LT (before and after IPAA) and their outcomes analyzed. A total of 160 patients were included: 112 (70%) nontransplanted at last follow-up; 48 (30%) transplanted, of which 23 (14%) before IPAA and 25 (16%) after. Nontransplanted patients at IPAA had more laparoscopic procedures [37 (46%) vs 8 (18%), P =0.002] and less blood loss (median 250 vs 400mL, P =0.006). Morbidity and mortality at 90 days were similar. Chronic pouchitis was higher in transplanted compared with nontransplanted patients [32 (67%) vs 51 (45.5%), P =0.03], but nontransplanted patients had a higher rate of chronic antibiotic refractory pouchitis. Overall survival was similar, but nontransplanted patients had more PSC-related deaths (12.5% vs 2%, P =0.002). Pouch survival at 10 years was 90% for nontransplanted patients and 100% for transplanted patients (log-rank P =0.052). Timing of LT had no impact on chronic pouchitis, pouch failure, or overall survival. PSC recurrence was 6% at 10 years. For transplanted patients, graft survival was similar regardless of IPAA timing. In patients with PSC-IBD and IPAA, LT is linked to an increased pouchitis rate but does not affect overall and pouch survival. Timing of LT does not influence short-term and long-term pouch outcomes.

INCIDENTAL DYSPLASIA DURING TOTAL PROCTOCOLECTOMY WITH ILEOANAL POUCH: IS IT ASSOCIATED WITH WORSE OUTCOMES?

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at increased risk of colorectal cancer. In cases of invisible or non-endoscopically resectable dysplasia found at colonoscopy, total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis can be offered with good long-term oncological outcomes and pouch survival, however, little is known regarding cancer-related outcomes when dysplasia is found incidentally after surgery. We hypothesized incidental colorectal dysplasia is associated with worse oncologic outcomes compared to dysplasia diagnosed preoperatively.

THIRD TIME’S THE CHARM? INDICATIONS AND LONG-TERM OUTCOMES AFTER REDO-REDO ILEAL POUCH ANAL ANASTOMOSIS

Pouch failure after redo ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) occurs in 20-40% of cases. The decision to offer a second redo procedure to maintain intestinal continuity is controversial, and scarce evidence exists regarding long-term pouch survival and functional outcomes after redo-redo IPAA.

Long-term Outcomes of Straight Ileoanal Anastomoses Converted to Ileal Pouch Anal Anastomoses

While ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the recommended way to restore intestinal continuity after total proctocolectomy, straight ileoanal anastomoses (SIAA) are still selectively performed, especially in the pediatric population. In case of SIAA failure, conversion to IPAA is possible, but reports on its outcomes are scarce. We retrospectively analyzed our prospectively collected database on pelvic pouches, and identified patients with a SIAA that was converted to IPAA. Our aim was long-term functional outcomes. Twenty-three patients were included (14 females, median age at SIAA 15 years, median age at conversion to IPAA 19 years). The indication for SIAA was ulcerative colitis in 17 (74%) cases, indeterminate colitis in 2 (9%) cases, and familial adenomatous polyposis in 4 (17%) cases. The indication for IPAA conversion was incontinence/poor quality of life in 12 (52%) cases, sepsis in 8 (35%) cases, anastomotic stricture in 2 (9%) cases, and prolapse in one (4%) case. The majority were diverted at IPAA conversion (22, 96%). Three (13%) patients never had stoma closure, due to patient wishes, failed healing of vaginal fistula, and pelvic sepsis, respectively. After a median follow up of 109 months (28-170), pouch failure occurred in 5 additional patients. Overall pouch survival was 71% at 5 years. Median quality of life was 8/10, of health 8/10, and of energy 7/10. Median satisfaction with surgery was 9.5/10. Conversion of SIAA to IPAA leads to acceptable long-term outcomes and good quality of life, and can safely be offered to patients with problems related to SIAA. IV.

Curable leakage in stapled IPAA has little effect on the long-term pouch function.

This study aimed to evaluate the frequency and grade of anastomotic leakage (AL) in stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) and its long-term impact on the pouch functions. A longitudinal cohort study was conducted on UC patients who underwent stapled IPAA at Yokohama City University Medical Center between 2007 and 2018. The diagnosis and grading of AL were performed in accordance with the recommendations of the International Study Group of Rectal Cancer. We assessed the functional pouch rate, late complication, pouch survival rate, bowel function (bowel movements per day, soiling, spotting, difficulty in distinguishing feces from flatus) and pouch inflammation (pouchitis disease activity index; PDAI) in the long-term period. Two hundred seventy-six patients were analyzed. Twenty-three (8.3%; grade B/C; 13/10) patients were diagnosed with AL, but a functional pouch was achieved in all the twenty-three patients. Anastomotic stricture was significantly more common in patients with AL (AL group) than in patients without AL (non-AL group; AL/non-AL: 13.0/3.2%, p = 0.020). There were no differences in other late complications. Furthermore, the pouch survival rate did not differ between the AL and non-AL groups (100.0/97.9%/10years, p = 0.494). There were no differences between the groups in bowel movements per day, spotting, soling, difficulty in distinguishing feces from flatus, or PDAI postoperatively. Curable AL may not affect late complications (except anastomotic stricture), pouch survival, the bowel function, or pouch inflammation over the long term. Perioperative management to prevent the severity of AL is as important as preventing its occurrence.

INCIDENTAL DYSPLASIA DURING TOTAL PROCTOCOLECTOMY WITH ILEOANAL POUCH: IS IT ASSOCIATED WITH WORSE OUTCOMES?

Abstract BACKGROUND Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at increased risk of colorectal cancer. In cases of invisible or non-endoscopically resectable dysplasia found at colonoscopy, total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis can be offered with good long-term oncological outcomes and pouch survival, however, little is known regarding cancer-related outcomes when dysplasia is found incidentally after surgery. We hypothesized incidental colorectal dysplasia is associated with worse oncologic outcomes compared to dysplasia diagnosed preoperatively. METHODS Using our prospectively collected pouch registry, we identified patients who had a) preoperative dysplasia or b) dysplasia found only after colectomy. Patients with cancer preoperatively or after colectomy were excluded. Included patients were divided into three groups: ONLYPRE (+preoperative biopsy, negative final pathology), PREFINAL (+preoperative biopsy and final pathology), and ONLYFINAL (negative preoperative biopsy, +final pathology. Long-term pouch survival in the three groups was assessed with survival analysis. RESULTS In total, 517 patients were included: ONLYPRE = 125 (24%), PREFINAL = 254 (49%), ONLYFINAL = 137 (26%). Overall, the median age at IPAA was 46 (IQR 36 - 62) and 33% were female. The preoperative diagnosis was ulcerative colitis in 91% cases. No demographic differences were observed between the groups. In patients with a positive preoperative biopsy, the concordance between preoperative biopsy and final pathology was 49% (Figure 1a). After a median follow-up of 12 years (IQR 3 – 21), there were no differences in overall, disease-free or pouch survival between groups (Figure 1b, c, d). Cancer/dysplasia developed in 11 patients: 3 (2%) in the ONLYPRE, 5 (2%) in the PREPOST, and 3 (2%) in the ONLYPOST group (Table 1). Oncologically, one required redo pouch (ONLYPRE group), while 4 required pouch excision: 1 (1%) In ONLYPRE, 1 (0.5%) in the PREPOST, and 2 (2%) in the ONLYPOST group (p = 0.24). Only one cancer-related death occurred in the entire cohort (ONLYPRE group). Disease-free survival at 10 years was 98% for ONLYPRE, 98% for PREPOST, and 98% for ONLYPOST (p = 0.968). Pouch survival at 10 years was 96% for ONLYPRE, 99% for PREPOST, and 97% for ONLYPOST (p = 0.236). CONCLUSION An ileoanal pouch in the setting of IBD-associated dysplasia, regardless of when it is diagnosed, confers exceptionally good long-term outcomes. The incidental finding of dysplasia during proctocolectomy does not seem to be associated with worsened outcomes compared to preoperatively diagnosed dysplasia.

THIRD TIME’S THE CHARM? INDICATIONS AND LONG-TERM OUTCOMES AFTER REDO-REDO ILEAL POUCH ANAL ANASTOMOSIS

Abstract BACKGROUND Pouch failure after redo ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) occurs in 20-40% of cases. The decision to offer a second redo procedure to maintain intestinal continuity is controversial, and scarce evidence exists regarding long-term pouch survival and functional outcomes after redo-redo IPAA. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed our prospectively collected pouch registry for redo IPAA procedures and identified all patients who underwent a second redo IPAA procedure from 2004 to 2021. Our primary outcome was pouch survival, defined as no pouch excision or rediversion. Figures are frequency (percentage) and median (interquartile range). RESULTS Twenty-three patients met inclusion criteria (65% female, 4% of all redo IPAAs). The index diagnosis was ulcerative colitis in 20 (87%) cases and indeterminate colitis in 3 (13%). The median interval between the index pouch and the second redo was 36 (24 – 90) months, while the median time between the first and second redo was 16 (9 – 36.5) months. Only 8 (35%) of patients had their stoma closed between the first and second redo. In 15 (65%) cases both redo procedures were done at our center. The indication for pouch salvage was the same for the first and second redo in 21 (91%) cases (Figure 1): 20 (87%) patients both redo for septic complications. Second redos were done transabdominally in 21 (91%) of cases, and 14 (61%) involved pouch excision and construction of a neo-pouch. All were handsewn, and the final pouch configuration was “J” in 18 (78%) and “S” in 5 (22%) cases (Figure 2). Twenty (87%) had their stoma closed after the second redo. After a median follow up of 39 months (18.5 – 95.5), 10 (44%) patients experienced pouch failure (due to sepsis in 9 cases of which 3 never had their stoma closed, and poor function in 1). Pouch survival was 81% at 1-year, and 76% at 3-years. The median interval between second redo and pouch failure was 12 months (3 – 50.5). Postoperative Cleveland Global Quality of Life surveys were available for 17 (74%) patients. After a median interval of 14 (6 – 40) months, the overall quality of life score (0 -1) was 0.6 (0.5 – 0.8). The median number of bowel movements was 6 (5 – 8) during daytime, 2 (2 – 4) at night, for a total of 8 (6.5 – 12.5) per 24 hours. Urgency occurring most days of the week was reported by 30%, frequency by 14%, seepage during the day by 71% and at night by 86%. Dietary restrictions were reported by 50% of patients, social restrictions by 44%, work restrictions by 62.5%, and sexual restrictions by 50%. CONCLUSION A second redo pouch procedure may be offered with acceptable outcomes to a very select group of patients who are highly motivated to maintain intestinal continuity.

LONG RECTAL CUFF SYNDROME AFTER ILEOANAL POUCH FOR INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE

Abstract BACKGROUND Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) removes the entire rectum to the anal canal, but is technically challenging, especially with minimally invasive (MIS) approaches. Pouches are most commonly double-stapled, leaving a 1-2 cm “rectal cuff”. If the cuff is longer, patients may develop recurrent ulcerative proctitis (UP) or rectal stricture (RS) of the retained rectum. The aim of this study is to describe long rectal cuff syndrome (LRCS) and its outcomes after redo IPAA performed for long rectal cuffs. METHODS We defined LRCS as a constellation of UP or RS symptoms related to a long (≥ 4 cm) rectal cuff. We retrospectively reviewed our prospectively maintained Pouch Registry to identify patients whose indication for redo pouch was LRCS. We report their presentation and outcomes after redo IPAA for LRCS. Figures are frequency (percentage) and median (interquartile range). RESULTS LRCS was the primary indication for redo IPAA in 40 patients (7% of the redo IPAA cases at our Center); median age at redo surgery, 42.5 (29 – 49 years); 18 (42%) were females; 36 (90%) patients were referral cases. Diagnosis at index IPAA was ulcerative colitis in 39 (97.5%), and Crohn’s in 1 (2.5%) case. The index pouch was performed MIS in 14 (35%). The median rectal cuff length was 6 (5 – 8) cm, with 13 (32.5%) patients having a cuff ≥ 8 cm. After a median of 21 (16 – 68) months, patients most commonly presented (31, 77.5%) with UP-symptoms (urge-incontinence, frequency, abdominopelvic or rectal pain) or with obstructive (9, 22.5%) symptoms (crampy abdominopelvic pain, outlet obstruction). Preoperative pouchoscopy was available in 32 (80%) cases: pouchoscopy findings included proctitis (18, 56%), rectal stricture (16, 50%), and/or dilated pouch (7, 22%). The median interval between the index pouch and redo pouch was 31 months (16 – 67.5). The pouch was disconnected and re-anastomosed to anus in 16 (40%), while excised with neo-pouch construction in 24 (60%) of cases. The anastomosis was stapled vs. handsewn 25 (62.5%) vs. 15 (27.5%). Pathologic exam revealed chronic active proctitis in 38 (90%) cases; the remained showed other pathologic changes. In terms of long-term outcomes, two (5%) patients never had their stoma closed after redo due to Crohn’s-related pouch complication, and fistulae development, respectively. After a median follow up of 34.5 (12 – 109) months, pouch failure occurred in 9 (22.5%) cases. The median interval between redo IPAA and pouch failure was 10 (4 – 34) months. Pouch survival at 3-, 5- and 10-years was 78%, 72%, and 63%. CONCLUSION Long rectal cuff syndrome is a potentially avoidable complication which presents with symptoms from either ulcerative proctitis or stricture. Redo IPAA can be offered as treatment to maintain intestinal continuity and may allow long-term pouch salvage in many cases.

S126 Pouch Urinary Fistulae After Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis is Associated With Decreased Pouch Survival

S126 Pouch Urinary Fistulae After Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis is Associated With Decreased Pouch Survival