Pouch Failure Rate Research Articles

Functional and postoperative outcomes in ideal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with parkinson disease and multiple sclerosis.

Patients with multiple sclerosis and Parkinson's disease may experience pelvic floor dysfunction and constipation which can affect ileoanal pouch emptying. This can lead to complications such as pouchitis, pouch dysfunction, and failure. We hypothesized that patients with neurological diseases have a higher rate of pouch failure and complications than healthy controls. Data were sourced from the institutional ileoanal pouch database. Patients with multiple sclerosis or Parkinson's disease, diagnosed before or after pouch construction, were matched to a control group of patients without neurological disease using propensity score-optimal matching. Demographics, postoperative and functional outcomes, and quality of life were analyzed. Twenty-six patients (38%) with multiple sclerosis and 16 (62%) with Parkinson's disease were matched with 42 healthy controls. The overall median age was 39 years, median BMI was 25.3kg/m2, and most patients were female (61.9%). Preoperative colorectal diagnoses included ulcerative colitis (83.3%), indeterminate colitis (9.5%), and Crohn's disease (7.1%). Patients with neurological diseases had higher ASA scores (class III, 57.1% vs. 21.4%; p < 0.01), fewer nocturnal bowel movements (median 0 vs. 2; p < 0.001), fewer bowel movements over 24h (median 6 vs. 8; p = 0.01), and were less likely to recommend IPAA construction (72.7% vs. 97%; p = 0.01) than the controls. Other surgical, functional, and quality-of-life outcomes were similar. Patients with multiple sclerosis or Parkinson's disease might differ in pouch function compared with healthy controls. These neurological diseases might affect pouch function. The rate of pouch failure was similar, showing its feasibility despite multiple sclerosis and Parkinson's disease.

Pelvic Radiation Therapy Increases Risk of Pouch Failure in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Ileal Pouch.

The effect of radiation on the ileal pouch is less well studied in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. This retrospective study investigates the impact of external radiation therapy on the outcomes of ileal pouches. The study included 82 patients with IBD and ileal pouches, of whom 12 received pelvic radiation, 16 abdominal radiation, 14 radiation in other fields, and 40 served as controls with no radiation. Pouch-related outcomes, including pouch failure, worsening of symptoms, pouchitis, and development of strictures, along with changes in Pouch Disease Activity Index (PDAI) scores pre- and post-radiation were assessed. The pelvic radiation group exhibited a significantly higher rate of pouch failure (25%, p < 0.004) and worsening pouch-related symptoms (75%, p = 0.012) compared to other groups. Although not statistically significant, a higher incidence of pouchitis was observed in the pelvic radiation group (45.5%, p = 0.071). Strictures were more common in the pelvic radiation group (25%, p = 0.043). Logistic regression analysis revealed that pelvic radiation significantly increased the odds of pouch-related adverse outcomes (OR 5.66; 95% confidence interval: 1.61-21.5). Pelvic radiation significantly impacts the outcomes of ileal pouches in patients with IBD, increasing the risk of pouch failure, symptom exacerbation, and structural complications. These findings underscore the need for careful consideration of radiation therapy in this patient population and highlight the importance of closely monitoring and managing radiation-induced pouch dysfunction.

Three-stage versus modified two-stage surgery for ulcerative colitis: a patient-centred treatment trade-off study.

There is ongoing debate about whether ileal pouch-anal anastomosis needs temporary diversion at the time of construction. Stomas may reduce risk for anastomotic leak (AL) but are also associated with complications, emergency department visits and readmissions. This treatment trade-off study aims to measure patients' preferences by assessing the absolute risk of AL and pouch failure (PF) they are willing to accept to avoid a diverting ileostomy. Fifty-two patients with ulcerative colitis, with or without previous pouch surgery, from Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, participated in this study. Standardized interviews were conducted using the treatment trade-off threshold technique. An online anonymous survey was used to collect patient demographics. We measured the absolute increased risk in AL and PF that patients would accept to undergo modified two-stage surgery as opposed to traditional three-stage surgery. Thirty-two patients (mean age 38.7 ± 15.3) with previous surgery and 20 patients (mean age 39.5 ± 11.9) with no previous surgery participated. Patients were willing to accept an absolute increased leak rate of 5% (interquartile range 4.5%-15%) to avoid a diverting ileostomy. Similarly, patients were willing to accept an absolute increased PF rate of 5% (interquartile range 2.5%-10%). Younger patients, aged 21-29, had lower tolerance for PF, accepting an absolute increase of only 2% versus 5% for patients older than 30 (P = 0.01). Patients were willing to accept a 5% increased AL rate or PF rate to avoid a temporary diverting ileostomy. This should be taken into consideration when deciding between modified two- and three-stage pouch procedures.

Long-term mental and physical quality of life outcomes following ileal pouch anal anastomosis surgery.

This study presents the authors' experience over 14 years of performing restorative procto-colectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA). The aim was to study the long-term quality of life outcomes and analyse the predictors of pouch function as well as physical and mental wellbeing. This is a single-centre retrospective study conducted in a specialised colorectal surgery unit in the UK. The study included patients who underwent two- or three-staged panproctocolectomy with defunctioning ileostomy for ulcerative colitis (UC) or familial adenomatous polyposis between 2004 and 2018. Data were collected from a prospectively, surgeon-maintained database. Pouch function and quality of life scores were obtained via validated questionnaires. A multivariate analysis was utilised to explore predictors of quality of life and pouch function. The study reports 105 patients who underwent IPAA with a covering ileostomy. The majority of operations were performed for UC (97, 92.4%). The median age of patients was 36 years and the male to female ratio was 1:1. Thirty patients (28.5%) suffered early post-IPAA complications, while pouch failure rate was 11.4% (12/105). Late complications were reported at a rate of 45%. On long-term follow-up, the median Pouch Function Score was 7 (IQR 3-14). Both the physical and mental sections of the quality of life score were at a median indistinguishable from the normal population but had different predictors associated with them. Our findings recognise the complex interplay between physical and psychological wellbeing after pouch surgery and advise psychological counselling where appropriate.

P366 Risk factors and outcomes of chronic antibiotic-refractory pouchitis in Korean ulcerative colitis patients: a single center retrospective study

Abstract Background Chronic inflammation of the pouch after total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) remains a morbid complication in ulcerative colitis (UC). The goal of this study was to investigate risk factors and clinical outcomes of chronic antibiotic-refractory pouchitis (CARP) in Korean patients with UC. Methods This was a single center retrospective study on patients with UC who underwent total proctocolectomy with IPAA at Asan Medical Center in Korea between January 1987 and December 2022. CARP was defined as failure to respond to a 4-week course of a single antibiotic, needing more than 4 weeks of therapy with 5-aminosalicylates, steroids, immunomodulators or biologics/small molecules, while chronic antibiotic-dependent pouchitis (CADP) was defined as more than 3 episodes of pouchitis per year or persistent symptoms requiring long-term antibiotics to maintain disease remission. Primary outcomes were endoscopic remission defined as complete mucosal healing of chronic pouchitis and pouch failure defined as the requirement of diverting loop ileostomy or pouch excision. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis were used to identify risk factors of CARP. Results A total of 251 patients were included and 232 were analyzed (Male, 57.3%; Current smoker, 13.4%; Median age at surgery, 44 years; Disease duration at surgery, 4 years; Previous exposure to biologics/small molecules, 23.7%; Extra-intestinal manifestations, 8.2%; Preoperative cytomegalovirus infection, 19.4%). The most common cause of surgery was steroid refractoriness (50.9%), followed by dysplasia/colorectal cancer (26.7%). The median time from surgery to chronic pouchitis was 48 months (interquartile range 23.5–100.0). Among 74 patients (31.9%) with chronic pouchitis, 31 patients (13.4%) were CARP and 43 patients (18.5%) were CADP. The most frequent endoscopic phenotype according to Chicago classification was focal inflammation of the pouch in all groups (chronic pouchitis, 47.3%; CARP, 35.5%; CADP, 55.8%). Patients with CARP were less likely to have concomitant probiotics compared with CADP (29.0% vs 72.1%; p&amp;lt;0.01). Endoscopic remission rate in chronic pouchitis, CARP, and CADP were 14.9% (11/74), 9.7% (3/31), and 18.6% (8/43), respectively (Table 1). Pouch failure rate in chronic pouchitis, CARP, and CADP were 13.5% (10/74), 16.1% (5/31), and 11.6% (5/43), respectively (Table 1). In a multivariable analysis, current smoking status was positively associated with CARP development (OR: 3.56; 95% confidence interval 1.33–9.52; p=0.01). Conclusion Current smoker with UC who underwent IPAA had a higher risk of CARP. Concomitant use of probiotics was less likely to be associated with developing CARP.

Surgical Options for the Treatment of Perianal and Anovaginal Fistulas in the Setting of Ileoanal Pouch Crohn’s Disease: Experience of a Tertiary Center

BackgroundThe leading cause of pouch failure following ileal pouch-anal anastomosis are peri-pouch fistulas and pelvic sepsis. ObjectiveDetermine the overall efficacy of current surgical therapy for the treatment of perianal and anovaginal fistulizing disease related to Crohn’s disease phenotype of the pouch. DesignRetrospective cohort study of a prospectively maintained, IRB-approved database. Settings/PatientsNinety-one (2.3%) patients of 3058 patients with an original diagnosis of ulcerative colitis who underwent proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis between 2000 and 2021 at the Cleveland Clinic and underwent postoperative surgery for Crohn’s-related perianal disease. InterventionsTwo hundred thirty-one operations for perianal or anovaginal fistula(s). Main Outcome and MeasuresHealing rate of surgical therapy for peri-pouch fistulizing disease, impact of recurrent interventions on outcomes, and predictors of surgical failure. ResultsOverall mean age was 39.1 (± 11.6) years, with a BMI of 25.3 (± 6.3) kg/m2. More than half of the patients were female (n = 52, 57.1%). Sixty-three patients (69.2%) had a perianal fistula, 25 (27.5%) had an anovaginal fistula, and 3 (3.3%) patients had both. Overall success rate for healing was 59.3% (n = 54/91) at a mean follow-up of 6.4 (± 4.8) years. Seventeen (18.7%) patients underwent a concomitant diverting loop ileostomy. Among them, eight (47.0%) patients had the ileostomy closure after a mean time of 9.7 (± 2.8) months. In the multivariable logistic regression model, patients who had seton insertions in any operation were significantly less likely to heal (OR 0.11 95%, CI 0.03–0.43, p = 0.001). Overall pouch failure rate was 12.1%. LimitationsRetrospective single-center study which lacks a control arm and consistent long-term follow-up specific to a population-based dataset. ConclusionsPouch patients who develop perianal disease are difficult to treat, sometimes requiring pouch excision. However, when medical treatment alone is not effective, a multidisciplinary approach including surgical intervention can result in complete fistula healing in more than half of the cases.

Population outcomes, trends and the future of pouch surgery for ulcerative colitis: a 19-year New South Wales data linkage study.

Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is considered the gold standard reconstructive option in ulcerative colitis (UC). Recent efforts to improve pouch outcomes have seen a push towards centralisation of surgery. This study aimed to document outcomes following pouch surgery at a population level within New South Wales (NSW), and identify factors associated with, and temporal trends of these outcomes. A retrospective data linkage study of the NSW population over a 19-year period was performed. The primary outcome was pouch failure in patients with UC who underwent IPAA. The influence of hospital level factors (including annual volume) and patient demographic variables on this outcome were assessed using Cox proportional hazards modelling. Temporal trends in annual volume and evidence for centralisation over the studied period were assessed using Poisson regression analysis. The annual volume of UC pouches reduced over the study period. The pouch failure rates were 8.6% (95% CI 6.3-10.8%) and 10.6% (95% CI 8.0-13.1%) at 5- and 10-years, respectively. Increasing age and non-elective admission were associated with higher failure rates. One-third of UC pouches (31.6%) were performed in a single institution, which averaged 6.5 pouches/year throughout the study period. Three-quarters (19/25) of NSW public hospitals who performed pouches performed less than one UC pouch annually. The outcomes following UC pouch surgery in NSW are comparable with global standards. Concentrating IBD pouch surgery with the aim of producing specialist surgical teams may be a reasonable way forward in NSW and would ensure equity of access and facilitate research and training collaboration.

Predictors of pouch failure: A tertiary care inflammatory bowel disease centre experience.

Rates of pouch failure after total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) range from 5% to 18%. There is little consistency across studies regarding the factors associated with failure, and most include patients who underwent IPAA in the pre-biologic era. Our aim was to analyse a cohort of patients who underwent IPAA in the biologic era at a large-volume inflammatory bowel disease institution to better determine preoperative, perioperative and postoperative factors associated with pouch failure. A retrospective cohort analysis was performed with data from an institutional review board approved prospective database with ulcerative colitis or unclassified inflammatory bowel disease patients who underwent total proctocolectomy with IPAA at Mount Sinai Hospital between 2008 and 2017. Preoperative, perioperative and postoperative data were collected and univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify factors associated with increased risk of pouch failure. Out of 664 patients included in the study, pouch failure occurred in 41 (6.2%) patients, a median of 23.3 months after final surgical stage. Of these, 17 (41.4%) underwent pouch excision and 24 (58.5%) had diverting ileostomies. The most common indications for pouch failure were Crohn's disease like pouch inflammation (CDLPI) (n = 17, 41.5%), chronic pouchitis (n = 6, 14.6%), chronic cuffitis (n = 5, 12.2%) and anastomotic stricture (n = 4, 9.8%). On multivariate analysis, pre-colectomy biologic use (hazard ratio [HR] 2.25, 95% CI 1.09-4.67), CDLPI (HR 3.18, 95% CI 1.49-6.76) and pouch revision (HR 2.59, 95% CI 1.26-5.32) were significantly associated with pouch failure. Pouch failure was significantly associated with CDLPI, preoperative biologic use and pouch revision; however, reassuringly it was not associated with postoperative complications.

Can preoperative CT/MR enterography preclude the development of Crohn's disease-like pouch complications in ulcerative colitis patients undergoing J pouch surgery?

We aimed to determine whether ulcerative colitis patients with preoperative negative computed tomography or magnetic resonance enterography (CTE/MRE) were less likely to develop Crohn's disease-like pouch complications (CDLPC) and establish risk factors and predictors for developing CDLPC. This was a single centre retrospective analysis of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and inflammatory bowel disease unclassified (IBDU) who underwent total proctocolectomy with ileal J-pouch between January 2010 and December 2020. The study group comprised patients with negative preoperative CTE/MRE and the control group included patients operated without preoperative CTE/MRE. A total of 131 patients were divided into the negative CTE/MRE study group (76 [58%] patients) and control group (55 [42%] patients). There were no significant differences in incidence rates (21% vs. 23.6%, p = 0.83), time to developing CDLPC from ileostomy closure (22.3 vs. 23.8 months; p = 0.81), pouchitis rates (23.6% vs. 27.2%; p = 0.68), or pouch failure rates (5.2 vs. 7.2; p = 0.71). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed backwash ileitis (HR 4.1; p = 0.03, CI: 1.1-15.1), severe pouchitis (HR 3.4; p = 0.039, CI: 1.0-10.9), and history of perianal disease (HR 3.4; p = 0.017, CI: 1.4-39.6) were independent predictors for CDLPC. Negative findings on MRE/CTE prior to J-pouch surgery in ulcerative colitis should be interpreted with caution as it is does not reliably exclude or predict development of CDLPC. These patients should be preoperatively counselled concerning the possibility of developing CDLPC regardless of lack of positive findings on preoperative CTE/MRE. Patients with backwash ileitis with a previous history of perianal disease should be informed of the potentially increased risk of developing such complications.

Incidence and causes of failure in various anatomical pouch designs 20years after surgical primary ileal-pouch anal anastomosis construction.

Since the introduction of ileo-pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) surgery, various pouch designs have been applied. Recently, there has been renewed interest in creating larger pouch designs to reduce defecation frequency after pouch surgery. The aim of this study was to assess chronic pouch failure (PF) rates and causes in alternative S or septated (SP) pouches when compared to J pouches and B- shaped adaptations. This retrospective cohort study included patients that underwent primary IPAA construction surgery from 1978-2000. Pouch designs were subdivided in J and B (J/B), and larger pouches (S/SP). PF included need for a pouch excision, redo pouch procedure, revisional pouch surgery, or permanent ileostomy surgery. Outcomes of this study were incidence and causes for PF per pouch design group. Out of 200 patients who underwent IPAA surgery, 19 had an S/SP design and 181 had a J/B design. After a follow-up of 27.0 (IQR 23.3 - 29.0) years, 45/200 (22.5%) patients who underwent IPAA surgery between 1975-2000 developed PF. Some 78.9% of patients with an S/SP pouch developed PF, compared to 16.7% of patients with a J/B pouch (p < 0.01). Mechanical outlet issues occurred more often in S/SP pouches when compared to J/B (42.1% vs. 1.1%, p < 0.01), and were predominantly caused by septal- or pouch wall intussusception and efferent loop kinking (S-pouch). Despite an inevitable proportion of bias, the current study revealed that S/SP pouches were characterized by an increased PF incidence due to emptying problems after long-term follow-up when compared to J/B pouches. Constructing an S pouch or large septated reservoir at index surgery should therefore be questioned because of a shorter longevity.

Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in elderly patients - is advanced age a contraindication?

AimWe aimed to determine pouch function and retention rate for restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch‐anal anastomosis (IPAA) for ulcerative colitis (UC) in elderly patients.MethodsWe identified patients over 50 years old subjected to IPAA for confirmed pathological UC from 1980 until 2016. Patients were grouped according to age: 50–59, 60–69 and 70+ years. Short and long‐term outcomes and quality of life (QOL) were compared among the groups.ResultsSix hundred and one patients were identified (399 (66.4%) between 50–59 181 (30.1%) between 60–69, and 21 (3.5%) over 70 years of age). More males were in the 70+ arm, and more two‐stage procedures were performed in this group. Wound infection increased with age (P = 0.023). There was a trend of more fistula and pouchitis in the 70+ patients (P = 0.052 and P = 0.055, respectively). Pouch failure rate increased with age, and it was statistically significant in the 70+ cohort (P = 0.015). Multivariate stepwise logistic regression showed that pelvic sepsis (HR 4.8 (95% CI 1.5–15.4), P = 0.009), fistula (HR 6.0 (95% CI 1.7–21.5), and mucosectomy with handsewn anastomosis (HR 4.5 (95% CI 1.4–14.7)), were independently associated with pouch failure. No difference was observed in the QOL among the groups, but pouch function was better for patients younger than 60 years.ConclusionIn elderly patients with UC, IPAA may be offered with reasonable functional outcomes, and ileal pouch retention rates, as an alternative to the permanent stoma. Stapled anastomosis increases the chance of pouch retention and should be recommended as long as the distal rectum does not carry dysplasia.

P346 Chronic pouch failure rates after close rectal dissection and total mesorectal excision in ileal pouch-anal anastomosis

Abstract Background During restorative (completion) proctectomy and Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA), rectal dissection can be performed in either the total meso-rectal excision (TME) plane with anterolateral exception, or as a full close rectal dissection (CRD). CRD showed lower postoperative morbidity and better short-term quality of life (QOL) when compared to TME. We aimed to compare the incidence of chronic pouch failure (PF) in patients undergoing TME or CRD during proctectomy followed by IPAA for inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). Methods This mono-centre retrospective cohort study included consecutive patients who underwent IPAA surgery for UC from January, 2002 to October, 2017 in a tertiary IBD referral centre. Outcomes of this study were chronic pouch failure (PF) rates and PF-free survival between patients who underwent CRD and TME. Chronic PF was defined as a pouch-related complication occurring &amp;lt;, 3 months after IPAA surgery requiring pouch-redo surgery, -excision or definitive ileostomy without excision. PF-free survival was defined as months between date of functional pouch and date of surgical PF. Multivariable cox- regression was used to determine whether CRD as dissection type had impact on PF-free survival, when compared to TME. (Chronic) anastomotic ileal pouch-anal leakage and fistula were also included in analyses as confounding factors, which is in line with available literature1. Results Out of, 293 patients that underwent pouch surgery, 123 (42.0%) had a proctectomy in the CRD plane, and, 170 (58.0%) in the TME plane. As the median operation year for CRD was, 9 years later (2006 vs, 2015), a significantly shorter postoperative follow-up for CRD patients was reported (74 vs, 172 months, p&amp;lt;0.01). PF occurred in, 27 (9.2%) patients, of which six (4.9%) underwent CRD and, 21 (12.4%) underwent TME (p=0.03). Both the mean PF-free survival in months (162 vs, 195, p=0.31) and PF-free survival rate after, 36 months (98.1% vs, 92.1%) were comparable among patients who underwent CRD and TME (Figure, 1, p=0.31). CRD was not associated with developing chronic PF (Odds ratio = 0.96, CI, 95%:, 0.35–2.61) after multivariable cox-regression analysis. Figure, 1. PF-free survival curve for patients who underwent CRD (red) and TME (blue) Conclusion In the current study, we did not observe a significant difference in chronic PF after either CRD or TME. Although data on long-term functional outcomes and QOL are necessary to draw final conclusions, results of this study suggest that long-term outcomes of CRD were comparable to outcomes after TME. As an earlier study concluded CRD is beneficial when it comes to postoperative morbidity and short-term QOL, surgeons should consider performing close rectal dissection during IPAA surgery for IBD.

Indeterminate Colitis - Update on Treatment Options.

Indeterminate colitis (IC) is described in approximately 5–15% of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). It usually reflects a difficulty or lack of clarity in distinguishing between ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD) on biopsy or colectomy specimens. The diagnostic difficulty may explain the variability in the reported prevalence and incidence of IC. Clinically, most IC patients tend to evolve over time to a definite diagnosis of either UC or CD. IC has also been interchangeably described as inflammatory bowel disease unclassified (IBDU). This review offers an overview of the available limited literature on the conventional medical and surgical treatments for IC. In contrast to the numerous studies on the medical management of UC and CD, there are very few data from dedicated controlled trials on the treatment of IC. The natural evolution of IC more closely mimics UC. Regarding medical options for treatment, most patients diagnosed with IC are treated similarly to UC, and treatment choices are based on disease severity. Others are managed similarly to CD if there are features suggestive of CD, including fissures, skin tags, or rectal sparing. In medically refractory IC, surgical treatment options are limited and include total proctocolectomy (TPC) and ileal pouch–anal anastomosis (IPAA), with its associated risk factors and complications. Post-surgical complications and pouch failure rates were historically thought to be more common in IC patients, but recent meta-analyses reveal similar rates between UC and IC patients. Future therapies in IBD are focused on known mechanisms in the disease pathways of UC and CD. Owing to the lack of IC-specific studies, clinicians have traditionally and historically extrapolated the data to IC patients based on their symptomatology, clinical course, and endoscopic findings.

Staged Approaches to Restorative Proctocolectomy with Ileoanal Pouch—When and Why?

Restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) with ileal pouch anal-anastomosis (IPAA) is commonly performed for patients with ulcerative colitis, familial adenomatous polyposis, and selected phenotypes of Crohn's disease (CD). Due to concerns about the effects of surgical complications on pouch functional outcomes, debate remains surrounding when and whether RPC with IPAA should be performed in a staged manner. Particularly debated are the timings of the IPAA, whether it is constructed at time of the proctocolectomy and whether to utilize temporary fecal diversion with a loop ileostomy. RPC with IPAA can be performed in one, two, or three stages, with each stage typically separated by 3-6 months. Proponents of a staged approach argue that poor pouch function, which is often a result of IPAA complications, including leak and infection, can be difficult to overcome and mandate additional, major surgeries, and that staging pouch creation and pairing with a protective ileostomy reduce those complications. However, subjecting patients to multiple surgeries and prolonging their time with an ileostomy present unique risks as well. Surgeons' experience and preference and patient characteristics need to be considered when determining operative planning. Highly selected patients with CD can be considered for RPC with IPAA, although with an acknowledgment of inherently higher pouch failure rates. Understanding the short- and long-term consequences of RPC with IPAA construction can help surgeons determine the appropriate approach.

Ileal Pouch-anal Anastomosis Complications and Pouch Failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

This systematic review aims to assess the incidence of pouch failure and the correlation between ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA)-related complications and pouch failure. Previous studies demonstrated wide variation in postoperative complication rates following IPAA. A systematic review was performed by searching the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases for studies reporting on pouch failure published from January 1, 2010, to May 6, 2020. A meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model, and the relationship between pouch-related complications and pouch failure was assessed using Spearman's correlations. Thirty studies comprising 22,978 patients were included. Included studies contained heterogenic patient populations, different procedural stages, varying definitions for IPAA-related complications, and different follow-up periods. The pooled pouch failure rate was 7.7% (95% confidence intervals: 5.56-10.59) and 10.3% (95% confidence intervals: 7.24-14.30) for studies with a median follow-up of ≥5 and ≥10 years, respectively. Observed IPAA-related complications were anastomotic leakage (1-17%), pelvic sepsis (2-18%), fistula (1-30%), stricture (1-34%), pouchitis (11-61%), and Crohn's disease of the pouch (0-18%). Pelvic sepsis (r = 0.51, P < 0.05) and fistula (r = 0.63, P < 0.01) were correlated with pouch failure. A sensitivity analysis including studies with a median follow-up of ≥5 years indicated that only fistula was significantly correlated with pouch failure (r = 0.77, P < 0.01). The single long-term determinant of pouch failure was pouch fistula, which is a manifestation of a chronic leak. Therefore, all effort should be taken to prevent an acute leak from becoming a chronic leak by early diagnosis and proactive management of the leak. This systematic review aims to assess the incidence of pouch failure and the correlation between IPAA-related complications and pouch failure. Long-term pouch failure was correlated with fistula, suggesting that early septic complications may result in fistula formation during long-term follow-up, leading to an increased risk of pouch failure.

P268 Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis Complications and Pouch Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract Background Previous studies demonstrated wide variation in postoperative complication rates following ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA). This systematic review aims to assess the incidence of pouch failure and the correlation between IPAA-related complications and pouch failure. Methods A systematic review was performed by searching the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases for studies reporting on pouch failure published from 1 January 2010 to 6 May 2020. A meta-analysis was performed using a random effects model. The relationship between pouch-related complications and pouch failure was assessed using Spearman’s correlations. Results Thirty studies comprising 22,978 patients were included. Included studies contained heterogenic patient populations, different procedural stages, varying definitions for IPAA-related complications, and different follow-up periods. The pooled pouch failure rate was 7.7% (95%CI5.56–10.59) and 10.3% (95%CI7.24–14.30) for studies with a median follow-up of ≥5 years and ≥10 years, respectively. Observed IPAA-related complications were anastomotic leakage (1–17%), pelvic sepsis (2–18%), fistula (1–30%), stricture (1–34%), pouchitis (11–61%) and Crohn’s disease of the pouch (0–18%). Pelvic sepsis (r=0.51, p&amp;lt;0.05) and fistula (r=0.63, p&amp;lt;0.01) were correlated with pouch failure. A sensitivity analysis including studies with a median follow-up of ≥5 years indicated that only fistula was significantly correlated with pouch failure (r=0.77, p&amp;lt;0.01). Conclusion Long-term pouch failure was correlated with fistula, suggesting that early septic complications may result in fistula formation during long-term follow-up, leading to increased risk of pouch failure. Pouch survival may be improved through standardized assessment of anastomotic integrity for early identification and adequate management of anastomotic leaks.

Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in the elderly: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Despite good overall outcomes in most patients undergoing ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA), there is still hesitation about performing an IPAA in older patients due to the comorbidity burden and concern about incontinence. The aim of this work was to identify short- and long-term outcomes in older patinets undergoing IPAA to determine the perioperative safety and long-term functional success of IPAA in older patients. A literature search was performed for all publications on IPAA in adults aged ≥50years that reported short- and long-term outcomes. Data extraction included demographics, 30-day outcomes, long-term functional outcomes and pouch failure. Data were further separated by age group (50-65 and ≥65years). Outcomes were compared between age groups. Study quality and risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Of 1053 publications reviewed, 13 full papers were included in the analysis. The overall 30-day morbidity and mortality rates were 47.3% and 1.3%, respectively. Thirty-day postoperative rates of small bowel obstruction and pelvic sepsis were 7.6% and 9.9%, respectively. After a median follow-up time of 62months, rates of pouchitis, incontinence and pouch failure were 13.9%, 17.5% and 7.5%, respectively. There was no statically significant difference in rates of short- or long-term functional outcomes based on age 50-65 versus ≥65years. Increasing age did not increase the rate of short- or long-term outcomes, including pouch failure. These data suggest that the decision for IPAA construction should not be based on age alone.

Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Outcomes After Ileal Pouch-anal Anastomosis in Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis and Ulcerative Colitis.

The optimal restorative surgical management of patients with concomitant diagnoses of primary sclerosing cholangitis and ulcerative colitis [PSC-UC] who require colectomy is controversial, given that patients may have an increased risk for pouchitis after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis [IPAA]. We aimed to compare rates of pouchitis and pouch failure among patients with and without PSC by performing a systematic review and meta-analysis. A systematic search performed through August 18, 2020, identified 12 studies that compared the rates of pouchitis [n = 11] and/or pouch failure [n = 6] among patients with PSC-UC and UC alone. We then performed a meta-analysis using random effects modelling to estimate the odds of developing any episodes of pouchitis or pouch failure. A total of 4108 patients underwent an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis after proctocolectomy for UC. Of these, 3799 [92%] were performed for UC alone and 309 [8%] were performed for PSC-UC. In a meta-analysis of 11 studies, patients with PSC-UC compared with UC alone were significantly more likely to develop any pouchitis (63% vs 30%, odds ratio [OR] 4.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.86-6.18), chronic pouchitis [47% vs 15%, OR 6.37, 95% CI 3.41-11.9], and pouch failure [10% vs 7%, OR 1.85, 95% CI 1.08-3.17]. Patients with PSC-UC were more likely to experience pouchitis and pouch failure than patients with UC alone. The risks of inflammatory complications after IPAA must be weighed against the potential complications with other surgical procedures, and future studies comparing outcomes among these procedures may inform decision making in this population.

Mesenteric lengthening during pouch surgery: technique and outcomes in a tertiary centre.

Anastomotic complications after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) are often associated with excessive tension and poor blood supply. Carrying out a tension-free IPAA might prove difficult in a proportion of cases, especially if mucosectomy and hand-sewn anastomosis are necessary. The aim of the study was to analyse the outcomes of mesenteric lengthening in patients undergoing IPAA in a tertiary centre. Consecutive patients who required mesenteric lengthening during IPAA surgery between 2000 and 2019 were retrospectively included. Short and long-term outcomes were analyzed. Chi square, Fisher's exact test and Wilcoxon rank sum test were used as appropriate. Kaplan-Meier analysis was carried out to report the long-term rate of pouch failure. Some 131 patients (78 UC, three indeterminate colitis, 50 FAP) were included. The need for mesenteric lengthening, due to short mesentery or intraoperative complications, was unpredictable in 15 patients. The rate of surgical complications was 20.6%; eight patients required a reoperation, two of them experienced postoperative pouch ischemia. After a median follow-up time of 9.4years, the risk of pouch failure in FAP and UC patients was 7.2% and 13% at 10years. Despite the indication to mucosectomy has been reducing over the years, mesenteric lengthening is still required in a significant proportion of UC and FAP patients, also because of unforeseeable intraoperative conditions necessities.

Is diversion free ileal pouch-anal anastomosis a safe procedure? A meta-analysis of 4973 cases.

Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) has been established as the procedure of choice for patients who require excision of the colon and rectum for familial adenomatous polyposis and ulcerative colitis. The requirement for proximal stomal diversion in IPAA is controversial. To compare post-operative outcomes following IPAA with and without proximal diversion. Computerised literature search, of Ovid MEDLINE and EMBASE. Full-text comparative studies published between 1992 and 2019, in English language and on adult patients. Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis with or without proximal stomal diversion following proctocolectomy. Outcome measures were anastomotic leak, anastomosis strictures, re-operations, pouch failure, intra-abdominal sepsis, small bowel obstruction/ileus and mortality. Five hundred and forty-six studies were screened. Fourteen relevant studies included 4973 cases (1832 patients with no stomas vs 3141 with stomas). Anastomotic strictures (p≤0.0001 OR 0.40; 95% CI (0.26-0.62)) and pouch failures (p = 0.003 OR 0.54; 95% CI (0.36-0.82)) were higher in diverted than non-diverted patients. Re-operation was more frequently required in non-diverted patients (p= 0.02 OR 2.51; 95% CI (1.12-5.59)). Heterogeneity was low in 5 out of 7 variables. In selected patients, diversion-free IPAA is a safe procedure associated with lower anastomotic stricture and pouch failure rates than diverted IPAA. This appears to occur at the expense of a higher re-operation rate. An RCT is required to help define the selection criteria.